Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Symbol of the Government of Canada

ARCHIVED - Using External Service Delivery Key Performance Indicators


Warning This page has been archived.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.

3. External Service Delivery KPIs: Summary

External service delivery KPIs have not yet been finalized, but as of the publication of this document, specific service channel KPIs have been either recommended for standard adoption or proposed for discussion within the GoC's Performance Management Community of Practice. All KPIs are listed in the Treasury Board's Guidelines for Core Key Performance Indicators: Interim Report on Primary Service Channels, September 2004, and can be found on the Secretariat's Web site at /si-as/kpi-icr/interim/interim00-eng.asp.

Readers of this document should be familiar with the GoC's overarching performance management approach. The Management Accountability Framework, described at /maf-crg/index-eng.asp, lists expectations for senior federal managers in terms of the current elements of their managerial responsibilities. The recommended KPIs for service delivery focus primarily on the operationally oriented MAF elements, Citizen-Focussed Service and Stewardship.

Two levels of external service delivery KPIs are documented:

  1. Core KPIs (Table 1) are proposed as required indicators monitored by the Treasury Board. These seven KPIs, which represent status and activity grouped into five themes, are considered the minimum measures required for performance reporting, operational analysis, and Treasury Board proposals.
  2. Operational KPIs (Table 2) are recommended by the Treasury Board as important measures used by service operations management for effective tactical and strategic decision making. These 11 KPIs, grouped into eight themes, represent the minimum set of measures that provide overall management awareness of a service operation.

The specific measures that comprise these KPIs are listed in Table 3. Each channel has specific definitions for these KPIs. It should also be noted that some measures are not applicable to all channels. For example, while Average Speed to Answer for phone service and Average Wait Time for counter-based in-person services are equivalent measures, there is no exact equivalent for Internet service.

Some KPIs, e.g. the Access KPI for the Internet Channel, are composed of several measures. In this example, weighted averages of Access volumes are calculated through a variety of linking strategies such as organic search engines, paid search placements, and direct addressing.

In addition, the service model has a direct effect on the practical collection of service measures. For example, a significant number of Canada's in-person service locations provide services in what can be called a "retail" model. Visitors enter a location and can browse for periodicals, brochures, and other printed information. They may choose to use self-service Internet workstations to search on-line for government information or they may use on-location phones to call directly for information. In many of these service centres, GoC staff are available as information consultants and may approach visitors or wait for questions at an information desk. This model is significantly different than higher-volume, transactional queued models such as Passport Canada, where queue management software provides strong measurement support.

The initial focus of the KPI project is to provide a standard vocabulary and definition for all GoC service delivery organizations. The initial version of external service delivery KPIs proposes KPIs for the Citizen-Focussed Service and Stewardship MAF categories. A "strawman" proposal related to the People MAF category is included in the KPI document. As these KPIs have not been reviewed with departments and agencies, we have not included them in this version of the usage guide.

Table 1: Proposed Service Delivery Core KPIs

MAF Category

Theme

Core KPI

Citizen-Focussed Service

Access

Service Access

 

Quality

Quality (e.g. Accuracy, Professionalism)

 

Client Satisfaction

Client Satisfaction Level (CMT)

Stewardship

Resource Utilization

Cost per Contact

 

Channel Take-up

Total Contacts (visits)
Use of Technology
Service Effectiveness

Note: High-level core KPIs may be composed of several related measures, depending on the channel.

Table 2: Recommended Service Delivery Operational KPIs

MAF Category

Theme

Recommended KPIs

Citizen-Focussed Service

Access

Abandonment Rate

 

Quality

Average Speed to Answer

 

Client Satisfaction

(see Table 1)

Stewardship

Resource Utilization

Agent Capacity
Agent Occupancy
Agent Adherence

 

Channel Take-up

Unique Contacts/Visits
First Call Resolution

People

Experience

Staff on Strength

 

Turnover

Turnover Ratio

 

Development

Training Days/Agent
Coaching Hours/Agent

Note: All measures for the People MAF category are proposals at the time of publication.

Table 3: External Service Delivery KPIs by Category and Channel

* Indicates that KPI is proposed as a core KPI; other KPIs are recommended for operational management.

MAF Category and Theme

Phone
Channel

Internet Channel

In-person Channel

Citizen-Focussed Service

Service Access

*Call Access
*Caller Access
*Abandoned Calls

*Search Engine Rank
*Direct Access
*Server Availability
*Referral Percentage
*Conversion Rate
*Abandonment Rate

*Visitor Access
Visitors Serviced

Delay Measures

*Average Speed to Answer
*Service Level

Average Visit Duration

*Average Wait Time
Service Level

Quality

*Answer Accuracy
Professionalism

*Site Error Messages
Channel Feedback
*Professionalism

Answer Accuracy
Professionalism
Transaction Duration
Variability
Critical Error Rate

Client Satisfaction

*Client Satisfaction Level
Service Complaints

*Client Satisfaction Level
Service Complaints

*Client Satisfaction Level
*Service Complaints

Stewardship

Agent (Resource) Utilization

*Cost per Call
Agent Capacity
Resource Allocation
Agent Adherence
Agent Occupancy

*Cost per Visit
Agent Capacity
Resource Allocation
Agent Adherence
Agent Occupancy

*Cost per Visit
Agent Capacity
Resource Allocation
Agent Adherence
Agent Occupancy

Service Effectiveness

*First Call Resolution

First Visit Resolution

Turnaround time

Use of Technology

*Call Avoidance
*Calls Answered by interactive voice response (IVR)

 

Self-service Ratio

Channel Take-up

*Calls
*Callers

*Visits
*Visitors

*Visitors

People

Service Experience

Total Months on Strength (MOS)
Average MOS

Total MOS
Average MOS

Total MOS
Average MOS

Employee Satisfaction

Turnover Ratio
Employee Satisfaction Level (Sat Lvl)

Turnover Ratio
Employee Sat Lvl

Turnover Ratio
Employee Sat Lvl

Skill Development

Agent Coaching Ratio
Training Days/Agent

Agent Coaching Ratio
Training Days/Agent

Agent Coaching Ratio
Training Days/Agent