This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
User Fee | Fee Type | Fee- setting Authority |
Date Last Modified | 2009-10 | Planning Years | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue |
Actual Revenue |
Full Cost |
Performance Standards |
Performance Results |
Fiscal Year |
Forecast Revenue |
Estimated Full Cost |
||||
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filled under the Access to Information Act (ATIA) | Other Products and Services (O) | ATIA | 1992 | 5.94 | 9.06 | 2,280 | Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. | 96.7% | 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 |
9.50 9.00 9.00 |
2,980 2,680 2,730 |
Total | 5,94 | 9,06 | 2,280 | 27.50 | 8,390 | ||||||
Date Last Modified: N/A | |||||||||||
Other Information: It is the Department’s practice to waive fees where (a) the total reproduction costs that could be assessed amounts to less than $25; and (b) the legislative time limits have been exceeded by more than 6 months and the request contains a voluminous number of records. In 2009-2010, fees were waived in 62% of ATI requests completed, amounting to $2,830 waived. In an effort to reduce the amount of paper copied, applicants can request that certain information be provided to them by electronic means, such as by diskette, CD or email, in order to reduce the amount of fees to be paid. In 2009-2010, 17% of responses to ATI were made by electronic means; a reduction of 6% compared to previous fiscal year. The difference between the forecast revenue and the actual revenue is due to a 24% increase in the number of requests received by the Department in 2009-2010. |
User Fee | Fee Type | Fee- setting Authority |
Date Last Modified | 2009-10 | Planning Years | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue |
Actual Revenue |
Full Cost |
Performance Standards |
Performance Results |
Fiscal Year |
Forecast Revenue |
Estimated Full Cost |
||||
Subscription rates charged to external/private sector clients for printing and distributing the hardcopy version of the Canada Gazette | Regulatory (R) | Subscription fees are set in the Statutory Instruments Regulations |
Subscription fees last revised in 1985 |
70.0 | 64.0 | 152.0 | Meet all the legislated publication deadlines for the Canada Gazette and meet the publication deadlines for each of our clients. Achieve less than 1% error count in all editions of the Canada Gazette. |
100%: All notices were published within the legislated deadlines. 100%: The Canada Gazette Directorate met all of its publication dates for all formats of the Canada Gazette. 100%: The error count was 0.02% |
2010-2011 subscriptions 2011-12 2012-13 |
62.0 60.0 58.0 |
155.0 161.0 166.0 |
Total | 70.0 | 64.0 | 152.02 | 180.0 | 482.03 | ||||||
Date Last Modified: 1985 | |||||||||||
Other Information: 2. These figures are only the direct costs of producing and distributing the Gazette. 3. These figures forecast only the direct costs of producing and distributing the Gazette. |
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Subscription rates are charged for the printing and distribution of the Canada Gazette. | 100% compliance with the legislated publication deadlines for the Canada Gazette and the legislated publication deadlines for each of its clients. Error rate of less than 1%. |
100%: All notices were published within the legislated deadlines. The Canada Gazette Directorate met all its publication dates for all formats of the Canada Gazette. The error count was 0.02 % |
The subscription rates have not been modified since 1985. The establishment of the current fee structure pre-dates the November 2004 Policy On Service Standards for External Fees. |
Other Information: N/A |
User Fee (R): Dry dock revenue
User Fee (O): Other User Fees: Nil
Fee Type (R): Regulatory (R) as per Esquimalt Graving Dock Regulations, 1989 (SOR/89-332 and SOR/95-462)
Fee Type (O): Other Products and Services (O): Nil
Fee-setting Authority (R & O): Order-in-Council
Date Last Modified (R & O): 1995. Note: “Regulations Amending the Esquimalt Graving Dock Regulations, 1989” (SOR/2009-324 dated December 10, 2009) established new fees effective April 1, 2010.
Performance Standards (R & O): EGD meets on a regular and on-going basis with its tenant clients to ensure customer service and client needs are met.
Performance Results (R & O): Last fiscal EGD met on a formal basis every other month (6 times/yr) with all tenant clients. Additionally, all major vessels were met prior to departure to ensure needs were met.
2009-10 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue |
Actual Revenue |
Full Cost | Fiscal Year |
Forecast Revenue |
Estimated Full Cost |
See Note 2 | 3487.8 | See Note 2 No costs were incurred by other departments in support of the fee activity. |
2010-11 | See Note 2 | See Note 2 No costs were incurred by other departments in support of the fee activity. |
2011-12 | See Note 2 | See Note 2 No costs were incurred by other departments in support of the fee activity. |
|||
2012-13 | See Note 2 | See Note 2 No costs were incurred by other departments in support of the fee activity. |
2009-10 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue |
Actual Revenue |
Full Cost | Fiscal Year |
Forecast Revenue |
Estimated Full Cost |
See Note 2 | 1205.4 | See Note 2 No Costs were incurred by other departments in support of the fee activity |
2010-11 | See Note 2 |
See Note 2 No costs were incurred by other departments in support of the fee activity. |
2011-12 | See Note 2 | See Note 2 No costs were incurred by other departments in support of the fee activity. |
|||
2012-13 | See Note 2 | See Note 2 No costs were incurred by other departments in support of the fee activity. |
2009-10 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue |
Actual Revenue |
Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue |
Estimated Full Cost |
5600.0 | 4693.2 | 13533.8 | 2010-11 | 5000.0 | 14886.5 |
2011-12 | 6500.0 | 22338.2 | |||
2012-13 | 7000.0 | 66322.0 | |||
Other Information: |
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Fees for use of facilities are charged in accordance with the Esquimalt Graving Dock Regulations, 1989 (SOR/89-332 and SOR/95-462). | EGD meets on a regular and on-going basis with its tenant clients to ensure customer service and client needs are met. | Last fiscal year EGD met on a formal basis every other month (6 times/yr) with all tenant clients. Additionally, all major vessels were met prior to departure to ensure needs were met. | Service standards are published on the web site where users make facility bookings. http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/pac/cse-egd/index-eng.html |
User Fee: Dry Dock Revenue
Fee Type: Regulatory (R) as per Selkirk Marine Railway Dry Dock Regulations, 1989 (SOR/89-331)
Fee-setting Authority: Department of Public Works and Government Services Act (1996, c.16)
Date Last Modified: 1989, PC 1989-1198
Performance Standards: The user fees were introduced prior to March 31, 2004. Performance standards have not yet been established as contracts are established on an individual custom basis.
Performance Results: Selkirk Marine Railway Dry-dock services are responsive to, and satisfy the specific needs of each external user, in accordance with the Selkirk Marine Railway Dry-dock regulations.
2009-10 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
15.0 See Note 1 |
10.0 See Note 1 |
34.5 See Note 3 See Note 1 No costs were incurred by other departments in support of the fee activity. |
2010-11 | 29.0 | 36.4 See Note 4 |
2011-12 | n/a See Note 2 |
n/a see Note 2 |
|||
2012-13 | n/a See Note 2 |
n/a see Note 2 |
|||
Other Information: |
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Fees for use of facilities are charged in accordance with Selkirk Marine Railway Dry Dock Regulations, 1989 (SOR/89-331) | The user fees were introduced prior to March 31, 2004 and specific performance standards are established as contracts on an individual custom basis. | Selkirk Marine Railway Dry-dock services are responsive to, and satisfy the specific needs of each external user, in accordance with the Selkirk Marine Railway Dry-Dock Regulations. | The current fee structure was established in 1989 and pre-dates the 2004 Policy On Service Standards for External Fees. |
2009-10 | Planning Years | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Sub-Total (R) | 70 | 64 | 152 | 2010-11 | 91* | 191* |
15 | 3487.8 | 34.5 | 2011-12 | 60* | 161* | |
* | 10 | * | 2012-13 | 58* | 166* | |
Sub-Total (O) | 2010-11 | 9.5* | 2,980* | |||
5.94 | 9.06 | 2,280 | 2011-12 | 9* | 2,680* | |
* | 1205.4 | * | 2012-13 | 9* | 2,730* | |
Total | 90.94* | 4776.26 | 2466.5* | 2010-11 | 100.5* | 3171* |
2011-12 | 69* | 2841* | ||||
2012-13 | 67* | 2896* | ||||
* These totals do not include the Esquimalt Graving Dock totals. See the table below for these totals. |
2009-10 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
5600.0 | 4693.2 | 13533.8 | 2010–11 | 5000.0 | 14886.5 |
2011-12 | 6500.0 | 22338.2 | |||
2012-13 | 7000.0 | 66322.0 | |||
* Since revenues are not forecasted and costs are not calculated based on individual fee items, only the total figures are provided for all user fees at the Esquimalt Graving Dock. Significant amounts have been included in the estimated full cost for the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan – 2010/11 $4.2M, 2011/12 $11.5M, 2012/13 $55.2M – these amounts are awaiting approval. |