Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Symbol of the Government of Canada

ARCHIVED - Canadian Space Agency


Warning This page has been archived.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.

Section 2: Analysis of Program Activities by Strategic Outcome

2.1 Strategic Outcome Performance

This year marks the first reporting on two of the three performance indicators for CSA's strategic result approved and established in 2007. Though partial, this year's analysis should be considered as a first layer to which, incrementally over the next 10 years, additional details will increase its depth.


Canadian Space Agency Strategic Outcome

Canada's presence in space meets the needs of Canadians for scientific knowledge, space technology and information.

Performance Indicators

2008-2009 Performance

1. Canada's rank in terms of support for peaceful space-related R&D the measurement will provide the list of CSA missions, looking 10 years into the future and identifying the following for each mission:
  • the CSA's role
    (leader or partner); and,
  • the CSA's contribution (%) to the total mission budget.

In 2008, Canada was positioned 9th among OECD nations in government budget outlays or appropriations in R&D for civil space programs. The order of investment is as follows: USA, Japan, France, Italy, Germany, Spain, Korea, UK, Canada, Belgium, Netherlands, and Norway. This list does not include non-OECD members who are major space-faring nations such as Russia, India, China and Brazil.

2. State of the scientific, industrial and public sector communities involved in the space sector:
  • number of universities, companies and organizations involved;
  • number of people employed in space-related jobs; and,
  • number of corresponding FTEs in academia, industry and government.

In 2008, the Annual Space Sector Survey reported a space workforce of 6,742 people (6,205 in the private sector and 537 in the public sector) distributed among 215 organizations (130 companies, 35 universities, 28 federal departments and agencies and 22 other organizations such as not-for-profit associations and research centers).

3. Access and utilization by the Canadian government and industry of space data generated by Canadian space missions.

Not measured in 2008-2009.


Indicator 1 - Performance Analysis

Canada's ranking among other OECD countries is an insufficient indicator unless edified with complementary information such as a full spectrum of the level of support for each mission, an assessment of their level or diversity as well as the alignment with the Government of Canada and department's priorities. The mechanisms needed to gather systematically and continuously such information are not fully in place yet.

Source: EUROCONSULT: Government Space Markets World Prospects to 2017 (2008).


Indicator 2 - Performance Analysis

The second indicator, the state of the Canadian Space sector, is solely based on a survey completed on a voluntarily basis. For the time being, this survey is the only source providing a pulse of the Canadian space community. It is precious and reliable as long as necessary resources are provided to sustain or even improved its response's levels. 2008 was a good year in terms of number of responses and their timeliness. The results gathered by this survey have the potential to become key in the analysis of the Agency's strategic result. Awareness and promotional activities with the Canadian space sector about this precious data collection must be maintained or increased.

Source: CSA's State of the Canadian Space Sector Survey Results.


Indicator 3 - Performance Analysis

This indicator was not measured in 2008-2009. Identifying who accesses space data within the federal government was the first step in honing the data collection mechanism required for all aspects of this indicator. Awareness activities constitute the second step, essential to obtain such information.

Source: Internal reporting documents.


2.2 Program Activity Performance

The PAA is divided into six program activities; all of them contribute to a single strategic outcome. The first four are in line with the Canadian Space Strategy thrusts: Space Based Earth Observation, Space Science and Exploration, Satellite Communications, and Space Awareness and Learning. A fifth program activity, Generic Technological Activities, supports the three science and technology program activities. The Internal Services program activity supports all program activities.

In 2008-2009, the Program Activity results and indicators were thoroughly reviewed during strategic Performance Measurement Framework (PMF) exercise. Therefore, this Departmental Performance Report is starting a new cycle of reporting based on the reviewed performance measurements.

2.2.1) Space Based Earth Observation


Space Based Earth Observation

2008-2009 Program Activity Performance Measurement

Benefits for Canadians

Earth observation (EO) enables monitoring of the environment with unparalleled coverage and scope, enhancing our forecasting capabilities and our understanding of environmental systems.

EO data are used for sustainable management and development of natural resources, land use, fisheries and agriculture and providing support for disaster management.

EO missions are critical to security and sovereignty, offering cost-effective, wide-area surveillance of land and maritime environments that are difficult to access such as the Northwest Passage.

Among Canada's government users benefiting from EO data are Environment Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, the Canadian Ice Service, Natural Resources Canada, the Department of National Defence, and the provinces and territories.

Expected Result

The benefits of activities involved in Earth Observation from space serve Canadian users in the fields of environment, resource and land-use management, and security and sovereignty.

Main Accomplishments in 2008-2009

RADARSAT-2 is fully operational since April 2008. A total of 264 projects were supported during the 2008-2009 period, focussing on applications development of the advanced mode of RADARSAT-2. The portion of the Canadian government data allocation value at $445 million used this year was $13.8 million.

The CSA continued the planning of the first satellite for the RADARSAT Constellation, the follow-on mission to RADARSAT-2, to be launched in 2014.

Canada's first scientific satellite, SCISAT, entered its 6th year of successful operation with an expanding the range of coverage from international agreements.

Canada's participation in ESA-EO programs opened the door to ten teams of Canadian scientist, and nine value-added companies were attributed contracts.

Indicators

Performance Summary

1. Proportion of active missions relative to the total number of missions supported by Canada in the EO priority areas.

28 %; 9 active missions out of 35 supported missions.

2. Number of applications developed as a result of CSA's participation in space missions and/or support to projects/activities in EO considered "operational" from program standards.

A total of 23 applications became operational in 2008-2009.

3. Number of uses of EO data as a result of CSA's participation in space missions and/or support to projects/activities in EO.

A total of 44 uses were reported.


Indicator 1 - Performance Analysis

(Year) = Actual or projected launch date or date of completion when known.
* = New missions in 2008-2009 - 31% (11/35)

EO missions at the Operation stage (9):
CloudSat (2006), ESA-ENVISAT (2002), ESA-ERS-2 (2005), ESA-GOCE (2009), MOPITT (1999), OSIRIS (2001), RADARSAT-1 (1995), RADARSAT-2 (2008), SCISAT (2003).

EO missions at the Development stage(13): * = 3
RADARSAT Constellation (2014), ESA/JAXA-EarthCARE (2013), ESA-ADM/Aeolus (2009), ESA-Cryosat (2009), ESA-Sentinel-1 (2011), ESA-Sentinel-2* (2012-2016), ESA-Sentinel-3*, ESA-Sentinel-5 Precursor*, ESA-SMOS (2009), ESA-Swarm (2011), JC2Sat, NIRST (AQUARIUS / SAC-D) (2010), PROBA-2 (2009).

EO missions under review (13): * = 8
CANSOC, CASS*, MCAP*, MEOS*, MOPITT-2, PCW/PolarSat (weather component) (2016), SMAP*, Snowsat*, SOAR*, STEP*, SWIFT (Chinook) (2014), TICFIRE*, WaMI.

Missions' descriptions can be found in the electronic version of "Analysis of Program Activities by Strategic Outcome - Detailed Performance Information"
at the following address: http://www.asc-csa.gc.ca//eng/publications/default.asp#parliament


Indicator 2 - Performance Analysis

A total of 23 applications became operational in 2008-2009; 17 from the EOADP and 6 from GRIP divided as such: 9 monitoring applications (e.g. sea ice mapping, flood mapping, ice river jam), 2 detecting applications (e.g. ship detection, iceberg identification and location), and 12 measuring applications (e.g. soil subsidence map, geohazard mapping).

Source: Internal documents.


Indicator 3 - Performance Analysis

Twenty-six of the 44 uses (60%) reported had national purposes. The uses could be grouped under four main themes: Natural disaster, the Great North/Arctic, Water/Fisheries, Forest/Mining/Agriculture. Here are a few examples taken from CSA's EO Express publication:

Natural catastrophes: RADARSAT-1 data contributed to emergency response operations for the aftermath of the 7.8 Earthquake in eastern Sichuan, China (Edition 27 - topic 13).

The Great North/Arctic: Because the Arctic has seen the highest rate of climate warning and with their protected nature, national parks, are clearly the best laboratories for studying and reporting climate change in the Arctic ecosystems to Canadians (Edition 26 - topic 2).

Water/Fisheries: In partnership with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, new tools and methodologies based on Earth observation data are being developed to better understand ocean ecosystems, climate changes and renew the economic viability of our fisheries. As a result, the first patch of Sargassum on the North Atlantic Ocean was detected. Sargassum is a floating marine vegetation that absorbs carbon dioxide (CO2) a greenhouse gas that contributes to global warming (Edition 31 - topic 1).

Forest/Mining/Agriculture: The province of Alberta often has landslides, which have serious consequences for the economy, transport infrastructure and the health of Canadians. Information from Earth observation satellites enables the Alberta Geological Survey to monitor soil movements by radar interferometry techniques. Space-derived information is used to map geological hazards and produce land-use planning tools for decision-makers and the oil industry (Edition 26 - topic 7).

For more information, go to the electronic version "Analysis of Program Activities by Strategic Outcome - Detailed Performance Information" at the following address:
http://www.asc-csa.gc.ca//eng/publications/default.asp#parliament


2008-2009 Financial Resources ($ in millions)

Planned Spending

Total Authorities

Actual Spending

129.2

100.7

46.3

2008-2009 Human Resources (FTEs)

Planned

Actual

Difference

82.2

60.4

21.8


Any significant variance reported against Planned Spending set out in the 2008-2009 Report on Plans and Priorities is explained in Section 3.3.1 - Spending by Program Activity.

To learn more about Earth Observation, go to:
http://www.asc-csa.gc.ca//eng/observation/default.asp

2.2.2) Space Science and Exploration


Space Science and Exploration

2008-2009 Program Activity Performance Measurement

Benefits for Canadians

The CSA sustains and increases Canada's contribution to humankind's scientific knowledge and to the development of space related technologies. In the context of environmental change and resource depletion, fundamental and applied research in physical and life sciences and in space exploration has great potential to bring about socio-economic benefits. For instance, the development of a surface mobility capability on the Moon will require the use of solar-powered electrical propulsion vehicles, which, in turn, could well lead the way toward spin-off commercialization of green technologies for the transport vehicles of the future.

Space exploration, science and technology endeavours, which often involve international partners, position Canada to play an influential role in building strong and mutually beneficial partnerships with an increasing number of space-faring countries. In striving to become one of the most advanced, connected and innovative nations in the world, Canada offers and shares tremendous opportunities for the prosperity of global commerce and the safety of the global community through the peaceful use of space.

Expected Result

Participation in Canadian and international missions expands the scientific knowledge base made available to Canadian academia and research and development communities in the areas of astronomy, space exploration and solar-terrestrial relations, as well as in physical and life sciences.

Main Accomplishments in 2008-2009

The successful Phoenix Mars Lander mission ended in November 2008. Phoenix exceeded expectations by performing breakthrough science far beyond its planned 90-days in the hostile environment of the Red Planet, with discoveries like the presence of water ice in the Martian soil, and the Canadian discovery of snow falling from clouds in Mars' atmosphere.

Two new astronauts were chosen among 5,351 applicants after a year-long recruitment process; Jeremy Hansen and David St-Jacques are the first Canadians to join the astronaut corps since 1992.

Indicators

Performance Summary

1. Proportion of active missions relative to the total number of missions supported by Canada in the SE priority areas.

37 %; 33 active missions out of 89 supported missions.

2. Number of scientific instruments and technological applications developed as a result of CSA's participation in space missions and/or support to projects/activities in SE

A total of 58 scientific instruments and technological applications combined.

3. Number of peer-reviewed papers produced in academia and the R&D community in Canada recognizing CSA's support through its participation in space missions and/or support to projects/activities in SE.

A total of 397 peer-reviewed papers, reports and conference proceedings acknowledging CSA funding were published in 2008-2009.


Indicator 1 - Performance Analysis

(Year) = Actual or projected launch date or date of completion when known.
* = New missions in 2008-2009 - 45% (40/89)

SE missions completed (20): * = 3
Astronauts: STS-115 (2006), STS-118 (2007), STS-121 (2006), TMA-6/10S (2005); BLAST (2007), eOSTEO (2008), EVARM, FUSE (2008), H-Reflex, ICE-First (2004), MSS: STS-114 (2005), STS-119 (2009)*, STS-123 1J/A DEXTRE (2008), STS-124 (2008)*, STS-126 (2008)*; Phoenix (2008), PMDIS (2008), SCCO (2009), TRAC (2008), WISE (2005).

SE missions at the Operation stage (13):
ADAMS, BISE (2009), CADC/Hubble (2008), CCISS (2007), CGSM (2007), ELERAD (2006), ESA-Hershel-HIFI/Spire (2009), ESA-Planck (2009), Mangaroni (2008), Matroshka-R (2006), MOST (2003), MVIS (2008), THEMIS (2007).

SE missions at the Development stage (22): * = 6
Astronauts: Expedition 20/21 (2009)*, STS-127 (2009)*; BCAT-5 (2009)*, Cambium (2009), CASSIOPE-ePOP (2010), CHENNS (2014), CIMEX (2011), EBEX, ESA-Exomars*, ESA-MICAST* (2010), ESA-Swarm (2011) (canadian instruments for ion measurement), FPEF (2011), Hypersole (2010)*, ICAPS (2010), IVIDIL (2009), JWST-FGS (2014), MSL-APXS (2011), NEOSSAT (2011), NEQUISOL (2010), SPIDER, UVIT-ASTROSAT (2010), Vascular (2009).

SE missions under review (34): * = 31
CanALSS*, DynAMO*, ESA-Cross-scale*, EVIS*, FPNS*, GPR*, HALO*, ILN*, Insect Habitat, ISRU*, LEMUR*, LiteArm*, LORE*, LSC*, Lunar Rover*, MEMS LIDAR*, M-FTSIS*, MIM/ATEN, MLM*, MSO-FTIR*, MSO-SAR*, MSR NET (Vision System)*, MWD*, ORBITALS (2014), RAO*, RAPIER*, Ravens*, Remote Care Health*, ROSM*, SBIS*, SCOPE*, SPICA*, TRACTEUR*, VSE*. Missions' descriptions can be found in the electronic version of "Analysis of Program Activities by Strategic Outcome - Detailed Performance Information" at the following address:
http://www.asc-csa.gc.ca//eng/publications/default.asp#parliament


Indicator 2 - Performance Analysis

The total of 58 scientific instruments and technological applications can be divided among five fields: 28 instruments/applications were identified for 5 Solar-Terrestrial Relation missions; 22 instruments/applications were identified for 14 Astronomy/Planetary Exploration missions; and 8 instruments/applications were identified for 21 Life/Physical Sciences missions. A ratio of 1.5 instruments/applications per mission is obtained with some missions having as many as 10 related instruments/applications and some missions having none.

Source: Internal documents.


Indicator 3 - Performance Analysis

A total of 397 peer-reviewed papers, reports and conference proceedings acknowledging CSA funding were published in 2008-2009 in Space Astronomy and Exploration, Solar-Terrestrial Relation, and Physical and Life Sciences. This number represents a 4% increase from the 383 reported in 2007-2008.

Source: Internal documents.

For more information, go to the electronic version "Analysis of Program Activities by Strategic Outcome - Detailed Performance Information" at the following address:
http://www.asc-csa.gc.ca//eng/publications/default.asp#parliament


2008-2009 Financial Resources ($ in millions)

Planned Spending

Total Authorities

Actual Spending

115.4

156.6

146.5

2008-2009 Human Resources (FTEs)

Planned

Actual

Difference

188.4

181.0

7.4


Any significant variance reported against Planned Spending set out in the 2008-2009 Report on Plans and Priorities is explained in
Section 3.3.1 - Spending by Program Activity.

To learn more about Space Science and Exploration, go to:
http://www.asc-csa.gc.ca//eng/sciences/default.asp and,
http://www.asc-csa.gc.ca//eng/exploration/default.asp

2.2.3) Satellite Communications


Satellite Communications

2008-2009 Program Activity Performance Measurement

Benefits for Canadians

Satellite Communications facilitates the linking of all Canadians by increasing the delivery of non-commercial services to Canadian remote communities, and support federal Government departments' program delivery.

Space infrastructure allows access and dissemination of timely health, cultural, security and safety related information to all Canadians wherever they live in Canada. Satellite communications are essential to provide Canadians living in remote areas with timely access to expert knowledge and expertise related to health and education through a range of non-commercial services including: e-government, e-learning, tele-justice, tele-education, as well as tele-medicine.

Expected Result

State-of-the-art systems and applications are developed to satisfy the needs of the Canadian government and population in order to ensure that Canada remains a world leader in satellite communications.

Main Accomplishments in 2008-2009

The Cascade telecommunications payload, part of the CASSIOPE Mission Contribution Program initiated in 2004-2005, became ready for environmental testing in 2009. The launch is planned for next year.

The CSA awarded a contract to finalize the ground segment infrastructure upgrade needed for the utilization of the Government of Canada capacity credit of the Anik F2 satellite by northern communities.

The M3MSat mission, the second joint CSA - DND micro-satellite mission (the first one being NEOSSat), will optimize maritime traffic identification. The preliminary design was initiated in June 2008.

Indicators

Performance Summary

1. Proportion of active missions relative to the total number of missions supported by Canada in the SC priority areas.

None of the 8 missions were active in 2008-2009.

2. Number of technological applications developed as a result of CSA's participation in space missions and/or support to projects/activities in SC.

5 applications.


Indicator 1 - Performance Analysis

(Year) = Actual or projected launch date or date of completion when known.
* = New missions in 2008-2009. However, note that this is the first time this list is compiled for a Departmental Performance Report. There are no new missions.

SC missions at the development stage (4):
CASSIOPE-CASCADE (2010), ESA-Alphasat, ESA-Gallileo SAT (2010), M3MSAT (2011).

SC missions under review (4):
Anik F2 Utilization (2010), Next Generation - Advanced Broadband payload # 1 (2014), PCW (telecommunication aspect) (2016), QuickSat.

Missions' descriptions can be found in the electronic version of "Analysis of Program Activities by Strategic Outcome - Detailed Performance Information" at the following address: http://www.asc-csa.gc.ca//eng/publications/default.asp#parliament


Indicator 2 - Performance Analysis

A total of 5 applications were identified for the 8 missions listed above: Cascade on board of CASSIOPE, Anik F2 ground infrastructure and terminal servicing, the MEOSAR instrument on board Galileo satellite and the RSS-GEMS for traffic identification; 60% of those applications (3/5) were related to Communications whereas the other 40% were related to Security / Search and Rescue. All applications, except one, had national objectives; MEOSAR which is developed in collaboration with ESA will serve the international community.

Source: Internal documents.


For more information, go to the electronic version "Analysis of Program Activities by Strategic Outcome - Detailed Performance Information" at the following address:
http://www.asc-csa.gc.ca//eng/publications/default.asp#parliament


2008-2009 Financial Resources ($ in millions)

Planned Spending

Total Authorities

Actual Spending

26.7

29.1

23.6

2008-2009 Human Resources (FTEs)

Planned

Actual

Difference

12.9

15.2

(2.3)


Any significant variance reported against Planned Spending set out in the 2008-2009 Report on Plans and Priorities is explained in Section 3.3.1 - Spending by Program Activity.

To learn more about Satellite Communications, go to:
http://www.asc-csa.gc.ca//eng/satellites/default.asp

2.2.4) Generic Technological Activities in support of EO, SE and SC


Generic Technological Activities in Support of EO, SE and SC

2008-2009 Program Activity Performance Measurement

Benefits for Canadians

Through its R&D investments and the resulting transfers of applications to the private and public sectors, the CSA's programs and activities attract highly skilled labour that contributes to Canada's knowledge-based economy; helps enhance the Canadian space industry's competitiveness by encouraging dynamic trade relationships with other nations; and increases Canada's ability to compete in the global marketplace.

Expected Result

Canada's industrial technological capabilities can meet the needs of future space missions and activities.

Main Accomplishments in 2008-2009

The development of Technology Roadmaps to guide and prioritize technology R&D at CSA was a key priority in 2008-2009. The priority technologies were defined in consultation with the technology manufacturers, the users and the experts.

The Space Technology Development Program (STDP) had 4 priority reached an operational level (TRL 6).

Through the Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer group, the CSA managed 53 active patents for 27 different technologies and 32 licenses, including 22 commercialization licenses.

By using the Partnership Support Program and NSERC's Collaboration R&D Program, the CSA and NSERC have continued to foster closer collaboration between industry, universities and government in space research and technology development. Eight projects were supported in 2008-2009.

The David Florida Laboratory conducted 131 tests for the CSA's, another federal department and 31 private-sector clients.

Indicators

Performance Summary

1. Ratio of the number of priority technologies identified for future EO, SE and SC missions to the number of priority technologies developed in GTA.

The number of priority technologies identified was 43 and the number of priorities having been financially supported for the same period was 21 therefore a ration of 2.1.

2. Number of priority technologies supported that are ready to be used.

The number of priority technologies supported ready to be used is 4 out of the 43 identified (9%).


Indicator 1 - Performance Analysis

Measured for the first time, it is too early to analyse this unique ratio of 2.1. Over the next three years, however, once the CSA's stabilizes its list of priorities, the ratio should get closer to 1, meaning that almost all technological priorities will have been selected and developed.

Source: Internal reporting documents.

Indicator 2 - Performance Analysis

In order to be considered ready to be used, a technology must reach a Readiness Level of "6" or higher. As a new technology proceeds to a higher level of maturity, the risk associated with its implementation in a space mission lessens substantially. It takes time and investments for a new technology to become ready to be used and therefore the priority selection must precede the actual need by a certain number of years. Like for the previous indicator, this one should, over the next three years, demonstrate how the CSA is making a steady progress towards meeting 100% of its identified priorities and therefore reducing its long-term risks.

Source: Internal reporting documents.

For more information, go to the electronic version "Analysis of Program Activities by Strategic Outcome - Detailed Performance Information" at the following address: http://www.asc-csa.gc.ca//eng/publications/default.asp#parliament


2008-2009 Financial Resources ($ in millions)

Planned Spending

Total Authorities

Actual Spending

48.3

43.8

41.2

2008-2009 Human Resources (FTEs)

Planned

Actual

Difference

141.4

116.4

25.0


Any significant variance reported against Planned Spending set out in the 2008-2009 Report on Plans and Priorities is explained in Section 3.3.1 - Spending by Program Activity.

To learn more about the David Florida Laboratory, go to:
http://www.asc-csa.gc.ca//eng/dfl/default.asp

2.2.5) Space Awareness and Learning


Space Awareness and Learning

2008-2009 Program Activity Performance Measurement

Benefits for Canadians

The CSA fosters science and technology literacy as a mean to influence the career choices of young Canadians towards science and technology. It also offers opportunities to enhance the expertise of Canadian scientists, engineers and physicians in space science, space technology and space medicine.

Expected Result

Targeted level of awareness of space among Canadians is reached.

Main Accomplishments in 2008-2009

The number of visitors to the CSA's interactive website increased by 8% from 1.49 million in 2007-2008 to 1.62 in 2008-2009.

Over 81 public events including those with astronauts were conducted in communities throughout Canada to raise awareness of Canadian space science and technology. Note that a video presentation was used in 2008-2009 reaching an audience estimated at 100 000 viewers.

The Space Learning Program conducted 117 learning events, combining in-class experiences, presentations and tele-distance education with primary, secondary and postsecondary students throughout Canada. Over 1.7 million students participated in these learning events, a slight increase from previous year.

A total of 873 educators participated in professional development workshops. It is a decrease from previous year because the Canadian astronaut missions STS-127 and Expedition 20/21 preceded the distance learning activities.

Indicator

Performance Summary

1. Survey results obtained every 3 years.

No National Public Opinion survey was conducted in 2008-2009 because of governmental guidelines.


For more information, go to the electronic version "Analysis of Program Activities by Strategic Outcome - Detailed Performance Information" at the following address: http://www.asc-csa.gc.ca//eng/publications/default.asp#parliament


2008-2009 Financial Resources ($ in millions)

Planned Spending

Total Authorities

Actual Spending

7.9

6.6

6.1

2008-2009 Human Resources (FTEs)

Planned

Actual

Difference

29.0

22.1

6.9


Any significant variance reported against Planned Spending set out in the 2008-2009 Report on Plans and Priorities is explained in Section 3.3.1 - Spending by Program Activity.

To learn more about Space Awareness and Learning, go to:
http://www.asc-csa.gc.ca//eng/media/default.asp; and,
http://www.asc-csa.gc.ca//eng/educators/default.asp

2.2.6) Internal Services


Internal Services

2008-2009 Program Activity Performance Measurement

Benefits for Canadians

The CSA strengthen accountability for results by implementing the government's commitment to modern public service management. Improvement of internal services at all levels of management raises the overall level of organizational performance by providing an added value to CSA managers in the performance of their duties.

Expected Result 1

Internal Services provide an added value to CSA managers in the performance of their duties.

Indicator

Performance Summary

1. Services provided meet standards set under Government-wide and CSA policies as well as MAF expectations.

MAF rating from the 2000-2009 Round VI assessments against the 21 area of management indicators were:
Strong = 1
Acceptable = 14
Opportunity for improvement = 5
Attention required = 1

Indicator 1 - Performance Analysis

The Treasury Board's assessment addresses only MAF indicators related to management quality.

Overall, the results are slightly better than the assessment in 2007-2008. Compared to 2007-2008, 3 areas of management have improved, 14 have remained the same, 2 have declined, and 2 were unable to compare. The number of areas of management at the acceptable level went from 10 to 14 and the number of areas showing an opportunity for improvement declined from 7 to 5. Compared to all the departments and agencies, the CSA rating was at the same level for 17 areas of management, at a lower level for 4 of them, and none was higher.

During 2008-2009, the CSA has undergone a transition at the presidency level, which has delayed the finalization of a number of MAF related initiatives. In response to round VI assessment, the CSA has assigned an officer of primary interest with an action plan for each areas of management.

Source: Round VI 2008-2009 Management Accountability Framework (MAF) Assessment.

Expected Result 2

The three highest priority risks identified in the CSA corporate risk profile are addressed and mitigated.

Indicator

Performance Summary

1. Mitigation action plans are implemented against the three corporate risks identified as highest priorities.

3 out of the 6 risk mitigation actions were completed.

Indicator 1 - Performance Analysis

Three out of the 6 risk mitigation actions were completed. Out of the three actions remaining, one was partially met although it showed significant progress towards achieving the targets and two indicators were postponed for Strategic Review and Long Term Space Plan concurrent exercises were prioritized. The CSA assessment concluded that the targeted risk tolerance levels were not reached and therefore remaining actions will be pursued in 2009-2010. The definitions of the priority corporate risks were reviewed in the RPP 2009-2010.

Source: CSA Corporate Risk Profile (internal document).


For more information, go to the electronic version "Analysis of Program Activities by Strategic Outcome - Detailed Performance Information" at the following address: http://www.asc-csa.gc.ca//eng/publications/default.asp#parliament


2008-2009 Financial Resources ($ in millions)

Planned Spending

Total Authorities

Actual Spending

40.6

45.3

42.2

2008-2009 Human Resources (FTEs)

Planned

Actual

Difference

270.1

225.4

44.7


Any significant variance reported against Planned Spending set out in the 2008-2009 Report on Plans and Priorities is explained in Section 3.3.1 - Spending by Program Activity.