ARCHIVED - RPP 2006-2007
National Defence

• Previous Page
• Table of Contents
• Next Page

This page has been archived.

Section 3: Financial Departmental Overview

Departmental Resource Consumption

Note: These FTE numbers are derived from a representative financial formula as there is not a consistent 1:1 relationship between FTEs and programs.

Table 1: Departmental Planned Spending and Full Time Equivalents

*Due to rounding, figures may not add up to total shown.

Notes:

1. This decrease in revenue is due mostly to a planned decrease in recoveries for foreign military training in Canada.

2. The FY 2007-08 estimates include $25 million in non-respendable revenue pertaining to the negotiated payment due from Germany related to its share of the costs of any future cleanup of the training area at CFB Shilo of unexploded ordinance.

Table 1a: Crosswalk of Interim Program Activity Architecture (IPAA) to Program Activity Architecture (PAA)

This table is presented for information only in the interest of continuity and comparability to previous years.

Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services)

*Due to rounding, figures may not add up to total shown.

Note: Treasury Board has released the Management, Resources and Results Structure Policy (MRRS) requiring departments to define how they plan and manage diverse programs and related activities, allocate resources and achieve and report on results, effective April 1, 2005. A departmental MRRS is to have three elements: a Program Activity Architecture (PAA); clearly defined and measurable Strategic Outcomes; and a description of the current Governance Structure, which outlines the decision-making mechanisms, responsibilities and accountabilities of the department. An Interim Program Activity Architecture (IPAA) for the Department of National Defence was submitted pending development of a preferred architecture. The long-term solution for the PAA has been developed and will be in place for 2006-2007 onward. The crosswalk table above is illustrative of how the planned spending for 2006-2007 would have been allocated under the Interim Program Activity Architecture (IPAA).

Table 1b: Crosswalk of Planning Reporting Accountability Structure (PRAS) to Program Activity Architecture (PAA)

This table is presented for information only in the interest of continuity and comparability to previous years.

Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services)

*Due to rounding, figures may not add up to total shown.

Note: The Treasury Board has rescinded the Planning, Reporting, and Accountability Structure (PRAS) policy that determined the format under which departments reported to Parliament. The PRAS has been replaced with a new policy that will strengthen accountability and reporting by aligning and integrating information with how departments manage resources and how these resources are linked to strategic outcomes. The crosswalk table above is illustrative of how the planned spending for 2006-2007 would have been allocated under the PRAS.

Table 2: Program by Activity

Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services)

*Due to rounding, figures may not add up to total shown.

Table 3: Voted and Statutory Items Listed in Main Estimates

Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services)

Note: The Main Estimates of 2006-2007 are $1,364.2 million higher than the Main Estimates of 2005-2006. This increase can be explained by the following: $500 million to address the shortfall in operating budgets (Sustainability), $497.7 million for Pay and Allowance increases for Military and Civilian personnel, $231 million to fund operations in Afghanistan, $169 million to partially offset the loss of purchasing power due to price increases, $100 million to fund the expansion of the Canadian Forces, $37.7 million to fund the clean-up of contaminated sites, offset by a $128 million reduction to fund the Department's share of the Expenditure Review Committee reallocations and $43.2 million in reductions for transfers and technical adjustments.

Table 4: Services Received Without Charge

Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services)

*Due to rounding, figures may not add up to totals shown.

Table 5: Summary of Capital Spending by Program Activity

Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services)

*Due to rounding, figures may not add up to totals shown.

Note 1: The Total Capital Spending of $2,267,832 thousand reported on Table 2 Program by Activity equals the capital portion of the Main Estimates for fiscal year 2006-07. This capital table is showing $2,499,609 thousand for fiscal year 2006-07. The increase of $231,777 thousand is the adjustment from the Main Estimates to the Planned Spending figure for the extended mission deployment in Afghanistan, Marine Security Initiatives, Budget 2005 and 2006 Announcements items net of other various technical adjustments.

Table 6: Loans, Investments and Advances (Non-Budgetary)

Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services)

Note:

1. Article VIII of the NATO Status of Forces Agreement signed April 4, 1949, as amended, deals with claims for damages to third parties arising from accidents in which a member of a visiting force involved. This account is charged with the amount recoverable from other states, for claims for damages amount recoverable from other states, for claims for damages that took place in Canada, and is credited with recoveries.

2. This account was established for the purpose of financing: (a) public funds imprest and public funds advance accounts; (b) standing advances; (c) authorized loans and advances to employees posted abroad; and (d) authorized recoverable advances to establish military messes and canteens. The total amount authorized to be outstanding at any time is $120,000,000 as last amended by National Defence Vote L11b, Appropriation Act No. 4, 2001–2002.

3. Advances have been made to the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, in respect of loans arranged by the Corporation for housing projects for occupancy by members of the Canadian Forces. The remaining loan was repaid in full during the fiscal year 2005–2006.

Table 7: Sources of Respendable and Non-Respendable Revenue

Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services)

*Due to rounding, figures may not add up to total shown.

Notes:

1. This decrease in revenue is due mostly to a planned decrease in recoveries for foreign military training in Canada.

2. The FY 2007-08 estimates include $25 million in non-respendable revenue pertaining to the negotiated payment due from Germany related to its share of the costs of any future cleanup of the training area at CFB Shilo of unexploded ordinance.

Table 8: Cost Estimates for CF International Operations

Departmental Capital Spending

Table 9a: Details on Project Spending — Capital Equipment Program

Projects listed in Table 9a have been identified as either: (1) projects in which the estimated expenditure exceeds the delegated approval authority granted to DND by the Treasury Board ($30 million with substantive cost estimates), or (2) projects in which the risk is particularly high, regardless of the estimated amounts. All major capital equipment projects fall under the Generate and Sustain Integrated Forces program activity.

^{Source: Assistant Deputy Minister - Materiel}

Table 9b: Capital Construction Program – Spending over $60 million

Projects listed below have been identified as either: (1) projects in which the estimated expenditure exceeds the delegated approval authority granted to DND by the Treasury Board ($60 million), or (2) projects in which the risk is particularly high, regardless of the estimated amounts. All major capital construction projects fall under the Generate and Sustain Integrated Forces program activity. For fiscal year 2006-2007, planned spending on major capital construction projects (>$60M) represents 18 % of total planned capital spending on construction.

Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Infrastructure and Environment)
* Based on data available as at May 1, 2006. All figures are exclusive of GST/HST

Legend:
I = Indicative Estimate
S = Substantive Estimate
PPA = Preliminary Project Approval
EPA = Effective Project Approval
PD = Project Definition
PI = Project Implementation
HST = Harmonized Sales Tax

For additional information on Federal Real Property and Federal Immovables Act visit: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/F-8.4/index.html

Table 10: Status Report on Major Crown Projects

Status report on Major Crown Projects (Equipment) can be found at:

http://www.vcds.forces.gc.ca/dgsp/00native/rep-pub/ddm/rpp/rpp06-07/MCP-eng.pdf

Table 11: Summary of Transfer Payments Programs

Over the next three years, National Defence will manage the following transfer payment programs in excess of $5 million.

Further information on these projects can be found at:

http://www.vcds.forces.ca/dgsp/00native/rep-pub/ddm/rpp/rpp06-07/transpay-eng.pdf

Table 12: Alternative Service Delivery

Over the next three years, National Defence will use new and proposed ASD initiatives for the following programs and /or services.

1. Contracted Airborne Training Services
2. Wheeled Light Armoured Vehicle (WLAV) Life Cycle Support Project
3. Canadian Forces Station Alert Modernization Project
4. 202 Workshop Depot
5. DND/Montfort Hospital Collaborative Arrangement
6. Information Management Services Transformation Project

Further information on these ASD initiatives can be found at:

http://www.vcds.forces.ca/dgsp/00native/rep-pub/ddm/rpp/rpp06-07/asd-fra.pdf

Table 13: Audits and Evaluations

A list of upcoming internal audits and /or evaluations can be found at:

http://www.vcds.forces.ca/dgsp/00native/rep-pub/ddm/rpp/rpp06-07/aud-eng.pdf

Table 14: Sustainable Development Strategies

The following table includes some commitments made by National Defence to green its operations. At a government-wide level, these activities are co-ordinated by the Office of Greening Government Operations (OGGO) at PWGSC, which includes work toward common governance, measurement, and reporting methods across departments.

Planned Full Time Equivalents

Table 15: Personnel Requirements – Military (Regular Force) by PAA¹

Source: Chief Military Personnel (CMP)(formerly Assistant Deputy Minister (Human Resources - Military)

¹ Planned FTEs reflect the Regular Force Expansion of 5,000 announced in Budget 2005 and include Class C Reserves. The table above does not factor in the additional personnel announced in Budget 2006 since planning details for this additional expansion have not been fnialized.
² These FTE numbers are derived from a representative financial formula as there is not a consistent 1:1 relationship between FTEs and programs.

Table 16: Personnel Requirements – Civilian by PAA¹

Source: Assistant Deputy Minister (Human Resources - Civilian) - extracted from incumbent files from the PWGSC On-Line pay system.

¹ Includes interim Communications Security Establishment (CSE) FTE's pending review by CSE. Interim CSE FTE's are based on RPP 2005-2006 planned FTE for fiscal year 2005-2006, and increased by 5% for every subsequent year.
² These FTE numbers are derived from a representative financial formula as there is not a consistent 1:1 relationship between FTEs and programs.

Table 17: Personnel Requirements – Combined Military and Civilian by PAA

Source: Chief Military Personnel and Assistant Deputy Minister (Human Resources - Civilian)
¹ These FTE numbers are derived from a representative financial formula as there is not a consistent 1:1 relationship between FTEs and programs.

• Previous Page
• Table of Contents
• Next Page