This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
The Employee Takeover Toolkit is designed to guide departments through an employee takeover transition process and complements the Employee Takeover Policy and Guidelines. Departments may want to use the toolkit as a starting point, tailoring the information to the specific programs or services being considered for an employee takeover. Departments should, however, consult the Employee Takeover Policy throughout the transition process to make sure they are meeting all the necessary requirements.
The following table describes the purpose of each tool and the contents of each chapter. The employee takeover process is not necessarily a linear sequence; some iteration should be expected.
Chapter |
Overview |
What's Inside |
Chapter 1: Employee Takeover Process Model |
Guides departments through the sequence of events and decisions in an employee takeover transition process. |
- flow chart outlining three main stages in the employee takeover process - timeline - list of high level tasks indicating where other tools in the kit apply |
Chapter 2: Employee Takeover Suitability Assessment |
Provides departmental designates with a tool to assess departmental readiness for employee takeovers and whether specific programs and/or services are suitable for employee takeovers. |
- outline of expression of interest in an employee takeover - employee takeover suitability assessment quiz - employee takeover proposal review checklist |
Chapter 3: Employee Takeover Business Case Template |
Assists departments and their designates in developing a business case for proposed employee takeovers. |
- outline of steps in building the business case - questions that should be addressed as part of the business case analysis - sample table of contents for summarizing the results of the business case |
Chapter 4: Employee Takeover Business Plan Assessment |
Provides background information and guidance to departmental designates in reviewing business plans from proponents for an employee takeover of programs and/or services. |
- outline of key elements of a business plan - business plan checklist - sample financial statements |
Chapter 5: Employee Takeover Contract Review |
A checklist for reviewing employee takeover contract documents. |
- checklist of essential contract elements for selected clauses - suggested contract language for selected clauses |
Chapter 6: Employee Takeover Resource List |
A list of examples of reference materials and resources that could provide more information to departmental designates and potential employee takeover proponents. |
- reference materials - suggested sources of additional information, such as community organizations, business advisors and government departments |
The following tool provides an overview of the events and decisions in an employee takeover transition process. This model is meant to be a quick reference chart for departments to plan and manage the process. It provides:
While the model is intended to guide departments through the employee takeover process, departments should consult the Employee Takeover Policy and Guidelines to make sure they are meeting all the necessary requirements.
This chapter
provides departmental designates with a tool to assess departmental readiness for employee takeovers and whether
specific programs and/or services are suitable for employee takeovers. The tool can be used in two ways:
1. As part of the evolution of departmental strategies for delivering programs, including alternative methods. This type of assessment would produce a list of potential or types of candidates for employee takeovers that the department would want to examine more deeply.
2. In considering how to respond to an expression of interest from an employee or group of employees about an employee takeover. The outcome would be a decision to examine this option more closely, invite the employee takeover proponents to develop their proposal further, and establish focal point processes for review and decision-making within the department.
In either case, the outcome is not an approval of a particular proposal but rather a decision to examine the employee takeover option(s) more closely, to encourage the employee(s) to develop their proposal further, and, if appropriate, to call for competitive bids. A sample of a basic form for employees to use in expressing their interest in an employee takeover is at the end of this chapter.
This tool builds on the employee takeover guidelines, section 2, which outlines the roles of the primary participants and the sequence of decisions facing departmental managers, and provides a more detailed assessment test for employee takeover suitability.
Departments should designate a senior executive to act as the departmental focal point for employee takeover decisions. This ensures that employee takeover planning in the department is consistent and relevant to the departmental strategy and that the process is fair. Employees should be encouraged to speak to the designate or focal point as soon as they have an idea for a takeover proposal. Thus, the focal point or departmental designate should be objective and independent. If a decision on a prospective takeover could affect the individual personally, another individual or individuals (i.e., the advisory panel) should be designated to consider that decision. In most situations, existing contracting mechanisms would be used for an employee takeover. Departmental contracting specialists can advise the departmental designate. Similarly, departmental legal counsel and human resource specialists can provide advice as needed.
Employee takeover planning can require a complex financial analysis. The department may also want assurances that the analysis is conducted objectively. The deputy head may create an independent advisory panel to help evaluate employee takeover proposals, and, as appropriate, oversee the contracting process. The advisory panel - drawn from the public and private sectors - recommends a decision to the deputy head.
Departments can help employee associations develop the takeover proposal and business plan. Employees considering an employee takeover bid should form an employee association. To receive financial support from the department, the employee association must be incorporated.
The department's decision that an employee takeover corporation could potentially deliver a program or service exists within a larger context of departmental strategies, program review and options on alternative methods of delivering programs. Ideally, a program review and alternative service delivery should be considered before an employee takeover. However, if an employee or group of employees expresses an unsolicited interest in taking over an activity, the department should quickly review the overall fit of this commercialization with the departmental strategy, including other initiatives such as forming a special agency. The employee takeover filters apply equally to unsolicited and "solicited" employee takeover situations.
The final filter in departmental planning is employee takeover suitability. If a program or service is not amenable to commercialization in general, it is highly unlikely that it is a good candidate for an employee takeover. The employee takeover suitability is measured on a continuum (see figure on next page). If the program or service fits more on the right side of the continuum, there is a greater likelihood that an employee takeover will be appropriate.
Fig.
This part of the Suitability Assessment tool is a quiz with four parts. The first is a preliminary assessment of the department's overall readiness for employee takeovers, and would be used once. The second looks at the fit with the departmental strategy and is used where there is an unsolicited expression of interest. The third part guides departments in considering whether specific units are suited for employee takeovers. It can be used proactively or in response to the expression of interest from an employee group. The final section helps clarify what the department should do to respond to the expression of interest or allow the idea to move forward.
Not all questions apply to all situations. The quiz will guide you to skip some questions and will also suggest where to obtain more information.
Check (ü ) the appropriate box.
1. Preliminary
1. Is the departmental employee takeover process clear?
r Yes - communicate to employees
r No - review the employee takeover guidelines and define the basic departmental process
2. Does the departmental process establish a clear focal point for an employee takeover assessment and decisions?
r Yes - communicate to employees
r No - review the employee takeover guidelines and define a focal point. Also consider establishing an independent advisory panel to help analyse more complex takeover situations
2. Fit with Strategy
3. Is the employee takeover opportunity interdepartmental in scope?
r Yes - contact the other department(s) and involve in the assessment
r No
4. Is the departmental strategy with respect to the program/service clear?
r Yes - communicate to employees
r No - go to question 4.2
4.1 Is the employee takeover opportunity consistent with the departmental strategy for the program or service?
r Yes - go to question 5
r No - go to question 4.2
4.2 To what extent can approaches other than direct delivery protect ongoing public interest in the program?
r There is no ongoing public interest - phase out the program
r Only direct delivery can protect the public interest - look for internal efficiencies. Consider whether segments of the program can be delivered in other ways
r Alternatives such as regulation or the terms and conditions of a contract or other agreement (whether the toolkit or other providers) can protect the public interest - go to question 4.3
4.3 On a scale of 1-5, where 5 is "highly operational in nature," to what extent do the decisions made within the program area focus on operations versus policy?
4.4 On a scale of 1-5, where 5 is non-core, to what extent is the activity or service "core" to the mandate?
4.5 On a scale of 1-5, where 5 is high, to what extent does the current mode of service delivery combine internal direct delivery and purchased or partnered services?
Tip: if the department already buys a large portion of the service, there may be less scope for further change.
4.6 Has a make or buy analysis been completed?
No - it is generally advisable to complete such an analysis as input to the business case
Yes - on a scale of 1-5, where 5 is "more cost effective to buy," to what extent would it be more cost effective to buy rather than make the service?
4.7 On a scale of 1-5, where 5 refers to high opportunities for improved use, to what extent could the program or service improve the use of resources by serving a wider market (beyond the public sector) or by diversifying products/services?
4.8 On a scale of 1-5, where 5 is high, how likely is it that users (internal or external) would pay/pay more for the service?
4.9 On a scale of 1-5, where 5 is high, to what extent can performance be measured?
Scores on individual questions should not be taken as the determining factor. If the average score on 4.2 through 4.9 is 3 or more, the department should closely consider alternative service delivery options. A variety of alternative service delivery options is available. If the score is less than 3, it is unlikely that either alternative service delivery or an employee takeover would be appropriate. Employee takeovers are a special case of alternative service delivery options.
3. Employee Takeover Suitability
The following questions look more closely at the suitability of the target work activity for employee takeover. There may not be enough information to respond fully to these questions at this stage. Where this is the case, users should flag the question for later review.
5. Is the scope of the employee takeover consistent with that of a small business? Tip: there are various definitions of "small business." For non-manufacturing sectors, Industry Canada defines a small business as one employing 50 or fewer people. For employee takeover purposes, the figure could be higher.
r Yes
r No - Note: Where the employee takeover implies a larger business, the scope may exceed departmental authorities for a takeover approval. This does not mean that the department should not proceed; it likely means that a Treasury Board submission is needed.
6. On a scale of 1-5, where 5 is high, to what extent does the delivery of the service require expertise? Tip: it is highly unusual that the expertise is unique. Be specific. Think about how quickly an existing business could develop this expertise. Where expertise is unique, consider the risk of creating a private sector monopoly in the future.
7. On a scale of 1-5, where 5 is high, to what extent are there positive regional economic development consequences from an employee takeover in this area? Tip: think about the impact on existing suppliers if the government "sponsors" new entry to the market. Can a domestic or international market be developed that does not exist?
8. On a scale of 1-5, where 5 is high, how important is it that service be continued during a transition to the private sector?
9. On a scale of 1-5, where 5 is high, to what extent could continuing employment through an employee takeover reduce the pressure for other workforce adjustment? Note: this information may not be available at this point; it is considered in greater depth in the business case.
10. On a scale of 1-5, where 5 is high, to what extent might a more entrepreneurial approach to service delivery produce significant gains? Tip: can efficiency gains be made through better use of existing resources?
11. On a scale of 1-5, where 5 is high, to what extent are existing employees interested in working in the employee takeover? Note: this information may not be available at this point; it is considered in greater depth in the business case.
12. On a scale of 1-5, where 5 is high, what is the general level of business acumen among the proponents? Note: this information may not be available at this point; it is considered in greater depth in the business case.
13. On a scale of 1-5, where 5 is high, what is the current level of private sector capability in this service area? Tip: where the private sector is currently very strong, the justification for a non-competitive process should be higher. Where private sector capacity is weak, there is greater justification for the employee takeover. This is considered in the business case.
14. On a scale of 1-5, where 5 is high, to what extent would the employee takeover be competitive in serving other markets? Tip: at this stage, the availability of alternative markets may be satisfactory; this aspect is considered more closely in the business plan.
An average score of 3 or more on questions 5 through 14 suggests basic acceptability of an employee takeover option. If the score on any one item is very low, the designate should provide feedback to the proponents. They may be able to adjust and modify the basis of the takeover.
4. Next Steps
If the employee takeover concept is basically acceptable, the department should advise the proponents to proceed with their business planning and proposal development. The following questions are designed to help the departmental designate organize for that phase of the process.
15. Are there other potentially qualified suppliers, including other employee groups, potentially interested in taking over the same activity? Tip: look at your response to question 6.
r No
r Yes - Tip: consult with departmental contracting specialists and agree on the overall process. It is important that all employee groups be considered equally.
16. Would some or all the employee takeover proponents likely be in a conflict of interest if they were to continue in their current duties while developing the employee takeover proposal?
r No - Tip: proponents may still be granted leave to develop
their proposals.
r Yes - Tip: consider requiring the proponents to take leave without
pay or assign the proponents duties that would eliminate the
potential for conflict.
17. Would the designate be in a conflict of interest if he or she participated in developing the business case and assessing the employee takeover proposal?
r No
r Yes - Tip: consider assigning the employee takeover proposal analysis to an independent advisory panel.
18. Do the proponents need access to other departmental information to develop their proposals?
r No
r Yes - Tip: if such information is accessible under access to information, you should provide direct access. In a competitive situation, all proponents should have equal access to departmental information. Departmental designates may want the employee association to disseminate relevant information to all employee bidders.
19. What level of support can the department give the employee takeover proponent in the developmental stages? Note: maximum support is $100,000, but the level of support should be proportional to the scope of the employee takeover. Where there are two or more "competing" employee takeover groups, departmental support should be spread among these groups.
20. Will the employee takeover likely require access to intellectual property?
r No
r Yes - consult with the Treasury Board Secretariat. Tip: consider whether the Crown would want to withhold access to that intellectual property.
21. Will the employee takeover likely require the use of other government property or assets?
r No
r Yes - consult with department facilities and materiel management specialists or Public Works and Government Services Canada. Tip: consider whether the Crown would want to restrict the use or sale of that property.
22. Are the relevant local unions aware that an employee takeover proposal will be considered?
r No - advise the unions
r Yes - agree on a process for ongoing dissemination of information
23. Are all affected employees aware of the proposal?
r No - advise affected employees
r Yes
The department designate should respond to the expression of interest within 30 days of receiving it. The response should provide clear rationale accepting or rejecting the expression of interest and, in the case of accepting, should outline:
It should also deal with issues relevant to the post-employment guidelines for senior executives.
Outline of Expression of Interest in an Employee Takeover
Name of the Proponent Employee Association |
Mailing Address |
|
Names of the Principal Employees in the group
Indicate whether each of these people is currently employees in this activity. Indicate whether they are senior managers. |
Telephone and fax numbers |
|
Name and addresses of third parties also involved in this takeover |
Telephone and fax numbers |
|
Name and brief description of the activity or unit targeted for takeover |
Division and Branch |
|
|
Location(s) |
|
Suggested benefits to the department in the takeover
|
||
Number of current employees affected |
Access to real property required r Yes r No r unknown |
Access to intellectual property required r Yes r No r unknown |
Annual operating budget of the unit (if available) |
||
Signatures of Principal Proponents |
Date |
|
Attachments (List) |
The following tool is designed to help departments and their employee takeover designates develop a
business case for proposed takeovers. This tool should be used:
Departments should next assess the costs and benefits of an employee takeover, preferably by using a business-case approach. They should ensure that such takeovers can withstand the test of public scrutiny with respect to prudence and probity.
The business case documents the feasibility of the proposed employee takeover. It outlines the strategic and economic rationale for a course of action. The business case includes a costing analysis of the proposed course of action, and the associated advantages and disadvantages. The department develops it and uses it as background when deciding whether to accept an employee takeover proposal, and the degree of preference for the takeover. The following points should be noted in preparing the business case:
The business case template builds on Appendix B: Departmental Guidelines for Employee Takeovers, Section 4: Analysis. It provides the steps to build a business case, a series of questions to ask as part of the business case analysis, and a table of contents to summarize that analysis. The employee takeover designate may use the summary to present the results of the business case analysis to the deputy head
Step 1: Getting Started
According to the Employee Takeover Policy, the department, by this point, should have:
Departments should complete these tasks before proceeding to Step 2 of the business case analysis.
Step 2: Describe the Options
Tip: Departments should examine only those options which they consider to be feasible. |
Tip: In weighing these options, departments should consider factors like the size of the program or service, number of competing proposals, and the level of support committed in writing from the deputy head. |
Step 3: Conduct a Cost Analysis
Tip: It is important to ensure that the comparison of costs and revenues for the options is based on similar factors in terms of the nature and level of service provided; consider relevant costs/revenues only. |
Tip: The purpose of assigning value to an asset is to help negotiate an employee takeover contract. There are specific rules for disposing of an asset, and departments should familiarize themselves with these prior to disposing of any Crown asset. |
Tip: include all costs that would be incurred before the employee takeover contract comes into effect. |
Step 4: Determine the Human Resource Impact on the Department
Tip: The business case for an employee takeover is strengthened when the new company agrees to hire employees whose employment would otherwise be affected by discontinuing the internal delivery of the service. |
Step 5: Conduct a Risk Assessment
Tip: This section does not only emphasize determining the potential risks, but also identifying what specifically could go wrong, and how to lessen that probability. |
Tip: Departments may want to use a risk matrix to help evaluate the potential severity (s) and probability (p) of risk associated with each option. |
Examples could include:
Step 6: Assess the Monitoring Implications
Step 7: Assess Value to the Crown
Below is a suggested table of contents for summarizing the results of the business case analysis. The designate may find this format useful for presenting the results of the analysis to the deputy head.
Recommendation
Assessment of Value to the Crown
Definition of the Service
Tip: This becomes the statement of work. |
Cost Analysis
Human Resource Impact
Monitoring Implications
Risk Assessment and Management
This tool outlines what the departmental designate should look for in a business plan. The purpose is to
provide background information and guidance to the departmental designate in reviewing business plans for an employee
takeover of programs and/or services.
The departmental designate should have the assurance that the employee takeover company assuming responsibility for a program and/or service is operationally capable and financially viable. All proposals for employee takeovers should include a sound business plan that demonstrates the proposed company's ability to meet the program and/or service requirements in the long term in a cost-effective manner.
Although business plans will vary in style and presentation, they should contain certain standard elements. All significant areas should follow a logical flow of information and be addressed and presented clearly. A business plan should clearly describe the employee takeover company as it is proposed, where it is going and how it is going to get there. Glossy packaging and fancy wording should not obscure the intent of the owner-managers. The proponents' ability to present this information concisely and logically can reflect their management ability. A suggested table of contents for a business plan is shown to the right.
The business plan is commercial, confidential information, and the departmental designate should make sure that access to this plan is based on need.
An effective business plan begins with a summary that provides readers with an overview of the business plan. It should contain preliminary information on the objectives and goals and planned strategies and highlight financial considerations.
The introduction identifies the proposed program and/or service to be taken over and general characteristics of the proposed employee takeover company. The employee takeover company would likely be one in which employees own shares.
A detailed analysis of all significant environmental influences must be conducted. The business plan should demonstrate that the proponents accurately understand the environment they would be operating in as well as all the risks and opportunities.
The business plan should contain an analysis of the current and anticipated future demand for the program and/or service. Since the department is a key client in the first few years, factors that could affect its future demand for services should be stated. If expectations of future demand differ from historical trends, rationale that appropriately supports these expectations should be provided.
The market for services outside the department should be assessed. This market includes other federal government departments, other public sector organizations and the private sector. The business plan should contain a description of the general characteristics of this market including buyer attitudes and habits and geographical location and size.
The effect of technology on the specific program and/or service should be addressed. Any changes expected in the future because of technology should be noted. Cultural and social factors that could affect the future demand for the program and/or service should also be indicated.
The business plan should profile the current supplier market. Their relative strengths and weaknesses should be noted including a description of their financial position and their management capability. If a business plan does not discuss this, the proponents have not dealt with a key area with significant implications for the future.
If the current supplier market consists of a few companies that have been in business for many years, it may be difficult for the employee takeover company to position itself to ever successfully compete against these companies. On the other hand, if the supplier market consists of many small young companies, it would be meaningful to know why the supplier market is not more mature (e.g., are there inherent risks in providing these services?). A description of where the employee takeover company would fit compared to the competition may indicate the company's possible success. A significant departure from the competitors' key characteristics would raise concerns that the employee takeover company may not be effective in delivering the programs and/or providing the services.
Introducing an employee takeover company into the marketplace that delivers programs and/or provides services to a federal department could affect the competing market. If this is a sound business venture, it is reasonable that the other companies will be aiming to position themselves to compete to deliver the programs and/or provide the services in the future.
Background information on the factors that led to forming the employee group and developing the employee takeover proposal would provide valuable insight into the possible effectiveness of the proposed company. A stated business philosophy or mission statement indicates that the company is serious about working towards a goal.
Details of the planned incorporation and a description of the proposed share structure strengthen the takeover company's business plan. A company does not need to be incorporated before submitting its business plan. If the company will be delivering programs and/or providing services in more than one province, federal incorporation may be advantageous. If the company will be operating in one province only, incorporation in that province may be preferable. Also, the type of business may determine whether provincial or federal incorporation is required. The business plan should describe the decisions made about the number, classification and relative ownership of shares of the proposed company.
The programs and/or services that the company plans to provide and the operating structure to deliver them should be described. This would include an overview of the business processes and a description of the location and facilities of operations. The business plan should detail the departmental data required by the employee takeover company to carry out its proposed functions. It should be clear that the company is focused on the program and/or service it will provide and is capable of efficiently providing it.
The business plan should contain an organizational structure outlining the reporting relationships and responsibilities of the key management positions including a profile of the employees who will be filling these management positions. A strong board of directors, with members with relevant business experience, can be an asset for a start-up enterprise. If a board of directors is being proposed, its members, their expertise and roles should be described. A general description of the characterisitics and number of employees should be provided. An appropriate mix of complementary skills must exist. Although an employee takeover company is likely to have employees with extensive knowledge and ability in delivering the programs and/or providing the services to be taken over, they may lack the required expertise for managing a small business in the private sector. To compensate for a lack of expertise in certain areas, the takeover company should indicate a plan for recruiting the necessary individuals and/or developing the required skills.
Proponents should clearly identify their business strengths. The most significant is to deliver programs and provide services by employees previously employed by the department to carry out these same functions. Knowledge of government delivery or the program mandate may produce other business strengths. The takeover company's long-term viability should be assessed in the context of these strengths. The seriousness of the proponents about the takeover could also be questioned. The departmental designate will want the assurance that the program or service that the takeover company delivers or provides represents good value to the Crown.
The business plan should state the type and extent of the takeover company's business insurance. Depending on the program to be delivered and/or the services provided, the employee takeover company may want to be bonded. An insurance company issues a bond which generally guarantees the performance of a contract.
As with any plan, the employee takeover company must have a clear idea of what it wants to achieve and how it is going to achieve it. The timeframe should cover at least three years and include the level of profit being targeted. Service level standards the company plans to maintain should also be noted.
An employee takeover can occur where the department will be the sole customer and the only reason for the takeover is to increase efficiency. Most takeover companies have plans to target other specific markets in the future. If the business plan indicates that the only current and future market for the service is with the department, this may reflect a lack of innovation and unrealistic dependence on one client. A business plan that has serious plans of expanding its customer base strengthens the case that it will be a viable company in the long term. After an initial three-year contract, the company should be prepared to compete with other suppliers in delivering the programs and/or providing services for the department if still required at that time. Market research increases the credibility of the projections and target. It should provide information on business lines, size, age and location of targeted markets.
The intention to develop other lines of business should be noted in the business plan and these should extend from the initial business line. Effective diversification protects a company from seasonal variations in demand and market fluctuations in any given business line.
The proponents must be realistic in their target market areas. Companies that focus on delivering programs and/or providing services with which they have a competitive advantage and target a particular market segment generally succeed. This is much more effective than trying to be "all things to all people."
A business plan should clearly detail the strategies to achieve the objectives and goals noted. For example, if the company plans to expand its share of the market, the marketing plan to achieve this should be noted. A marketing plan should contain information on pricing, profile of targeted customers and advertising methods. Some companies can effectively determine what they want to achieve but have difficultly in determining how to do it.
To maintain certain service standards and provide top quality service requires investing in the company's employees. Details of recruitment plans, training and quality control procedures should be outlined.
A plan for capital assets is important. A description of existing assets and plans for future additions should be noted. Any proposal or expectations for the company to acquire the necessary assets from the department should be outlined.
The business plan should include a detailed financial forecast for the operations. The appendix should have at least a detailed three-year forecast. The proponents should consult professional advisors in preparing and developing these forecasts.
Information on sources and uses of funds and more specific cash flows is particularly important. One of the main challenges for a start-up business is providing a good cash flow.
Since the revenue will come from fees charged for services rendered, the fee rate structure of the programs and services should be provided. All costs associated with providing these programs or services should also be captured. Business activities should be grouped into categories that are similar in nature whether in gross margins or by geographical distribution. Stategies for growth and expansion need funding so the proponent must address these in the business plan.
The key assumptions made in developing the forecast should be noted. This allows the reader of the business plan to assess the reasonableness of the assumptions and the financial forecast. A break-even point should be presented. This would indicate the level of activity required to cover operational costs.
It is better to identify risks than to pretend they do not exist. For example, contingency plans should be presented to deal with variations in expected demand for services. If the company identifies risks and outlines sound courses of action to deal with them, then it has considered all possibilities.
Opportunities noted throughout the business plan should be highlighted with plans to capitalize on them. A business plan that does not deal with business risks and opportunities clearly indicates that the organization is not prepared for the challenges ahead.
To evaluate an employee takeover proposal, a business plan must answer the following questions:
Check ( ü ) to indicate that the business plan contains the necessary information.
1. What is the general business environment that this company will be operating in?
r current demand for services;
r anticipated future demand for services;
r market outside of the department;
r impact of technology; and
r cultural and social factors.
2. What are the characteristics of the employee takeover company?
r legal form;
r ownership structure;
r equity investment;
r control of the company;
r capital assets; and
r location of facilities.
3. What is the profile of the competing supplier market?
r strengths and weaknesses; and
r compared to the employee takeover company.
4. What products and services will be provided?
r products and services
5. What are the main business processes supporting these programs and services?
r description of main business processes
6. What are the risks involved with providing these programs or services?
r description of risks
7. What strategies will deal with these risk areas?
r risk management strategies
8. How many employees does the employee takeover company plan to have?
r number of employees from the department to be given offers
r profiles of employees from the department to be given offers
9. Who are the key employees and what are their qualifications?
r key employees (including managers)
r description of their qualifications
10. What are the employee takeover company's business strengths?
r business strengths
11. What are the employee takeover company's objectives for the next three years?
r markets to be targeted in the future; and
r other lines of business to be developed.
12. What are the planned strategies to achieve these objectives?
r planned strategies
13. What are the requirements for capital assets?
r description; and
r financing arrangements.
14. What are the employee takeover company's financial requirements for the next three years?
r pro forma income statement;
r pro forma cash flow;
r key assumptions; and
r break-even point.
15. What is the proposed fee rate structure?
r compared to other providers; and
r compared to internal costs.
The departmental designate uses this tool when receiving an employee takeover proposal, developed after the deputy head has agreed to the expression of interest, to verify that the proposal contains all the required information. It also guides employee associations in preparing their proposals.
Check (ü ) to indicate that the proposal contains the necessary information.
r Name of the employee company or association proposing the takeover
r Name and location of the unit proposed for takeover
r Names, addresses and phone numbers of all the government employees who are principals in the employee takeover
r Names, addresses and phone numbers of any third parties involved in the employee takeover
r Signatures of all principals, witnessed
r Date of submission
r Is this the only employee takeover proposal pertaining to this government operation?
r Does the scope of the proposal extend beyond the boundaries of the department to other departments?
r Proposed duration of the contract
r Annual value of the contract
r Total value of the contract
r Proposed revenue sharing arrangements (if applicable)
r Method of payment, including cash phasing
r Repayment of contributions (as per applicable contributions agreement)
r Guarantees
r Requirement for Treasury Board submission
r Corporate ownership and organization structure clearly identified (President, Vice Presidents, Corporate Secretary and Treasurer roles at a minimum)
r Is the employee takeover corporation incorporated? (specify jurisdiction)
r Names and business/management experience of officers of the corporation (evidence of business acumen)
r External directors and their business experience identified
r Business plan provided (including pro forma financial statements)
r Employee share ownership plans identified (if applicable)
r Evidence that the employee takeover corporation has the technical capability to continue the required level of service
r Evidence that the employee takeover corporation has the managerial capability to continue the required level of service
r Evidence that the employee takeover corporation has the financial capability to continue the required level of service
r Evidence that the employee takeover corporation has the official languages capability to continue the required level of bilingual service
r Total number of employees affected by the employee takeover
r Total number of employees the takeover corporation proposes to employ
r Information on terms and conditions of the employee transfer
r Information on the status of employee transfer offers
r Evidence that the senior management post-employment guidelines have been addressed
r Proposed acquisition or leasing of intellectual property - items identified and terms and conditions of the acquisition/leasing clearly stated
r Proposed acquisition or leasing of real property - sites identified and terms and conditions of the acquisition/leasing clearly stated
r Proposed acquisition of supplies or other materiel - items identified and terms and conditions of the acquisition clearly stated
r Relevant economic development benefits identified (if applicable)
r Regional presence identified (if applicable)
Location (region)
Branch:
Contract Title:
Contract #:
Statement of services
Identification of parties (Crown and employee takeover corporation)
Identification of principals within the employee takeover corporation (refer to definitions in the Employee Takeover Policy and section 6.9 of the policy)
Identification of third parties (if relevant refer to definitions in the Employee Takeover Policy and section 6.6 (d) of the policy)
If non-competitive, contract not to exceed three years (refer to section 6.6 (b) of the Employee Takeover Policy and sections 4.2 (c) and (e) of the guidelines)
If non-competitive, contract not renewable (refer to section 6.6 (b) of the Employee Takeover Policy and sections 4.2 (c) and (e) of the guidelines)
Dates specified (beginning and end)
Total amount
Terms of payment
Total value not to exceed authority delegated to the department (refer to section 6.7 of the Employee Takeover Policy and section 4.2 of the guidelines)
If revenue sharing, provisions within the departmental authorities
If contributions were made to the employee takeover association, provision for repayment of these contributions (refer to section 6.8 of the Employee Takeover Policy and section 2.7.2 of the guidelines)
Abatements of contract price identified (if relevant; refer to section 2.1 of Employee Takeover Policy, Appendix C)
Verify that no conflict exists (refer to section 6.3 and 6.4 of the Employee Takeover Policy and sections 3.1.2 and 7.1 of the guidelines)
If potential for conflict of interest, provisions to prevent such conflict (refer to sections 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 of the employee takeover guidelines)
Levels of employment of former Public Service employees in a employee takeover corporation (refer to section 6.11 of the Employee Takeover Policy and section 6.4.3 of the guidelines)
Terms of employment of former Public Service employees constituting contiguous employment (refer to section 1.1 of Appendix C of the Employee Takeover Policy)
Personnel screening requirements, including reliability check
Resignation of principals (refer to section 8.2 of the employee takeover guidelines)
Restrictions on new principals (refer to section 6.4.4 of the employee takeover guidelines)
Provisions of post-employment guidelines
Official languages (if relevant; section 6.13 of the Employee Takeover Policy)
Requirement for retention of records and/or working papers
Requirement for performance guarantees, such as holdbacks or bonds (if relevant; refer to section 6.4.5 of the employee takeover guidelines)
Warranty (see sample)
If existing intellectual property transferred, refer to sections 5.4.1, 5.4.5 and 6.4.2 of the employee takeover guidelines
Provisions for new intellectual property created under the employee takeover corporation (see sample)
If provided by the Crown - terms and conditions
If transferred from the Crown, refer to section 6.12 of the Employee Takeover Policy and sections 5.4.3, 5.4.4 and 6.4.2 of the guidelines
Restrictions on assignment (refer to section 6.6 (e) of the Employee Takeover Policy)
If non-competitive, notice of award (refer to section 4.2 (c) and (d) of the employee takeover guidelines)
Terms for termination or suspension of the contract
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
|
Assets |
|||
Current Assets |
|||
Fixed Assets |
|||
Total Assets |
|||
Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity |
|||
Current liabilities |
|||
Long-term Debt |
|||
Shareholders' Equity |
|||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity |
|
Jan. | Feb. | March | April | May | June | July | Aug. | Sept. | Oct. | Nov. | Dec. | |
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receipts/Billings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office Supplies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Travel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bad Debts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit (loss) before Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sample Pro Forma Cash Flow Statement
|
Jan. |
Feb. |
March |
April |
May |
June |
July |
Aug. |
Sept. |
Oct. |
Nov. |
Dec. |
Source of Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (Increase) in Accounts Receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Disposition of Fixed Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Sources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uses of Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (Increase) in Accounts Payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayment on Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to Fixed Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Uses of Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources of information
Example:
Ministry of Economic Development, Trade and Tourism (Ontario)
Revenue Canada
Local municipalities
Department of Industry - market and competition information
http://strategis.ic.gc.ca
Entrepreneurship Centres: Information on starting up new businesses. |
|
Ottawa Entrepreneurship Centre Tel: (613) 560-6081 |
Hull Entrepreneurship Outaouais Tel: (819) 595-3403 |
Canada Business Service Centres: To provide small businesses with a single access point for information on federal and provincial government programs, services and regulations related to business |
|
Ontario Canada-Ontario Business Call Centre Tel: (416) 954-4636 or |
Quebec Info entrepreneurs Tel: (514) 496-4636 or |
Newfoundland Canada Business Service Centre Tel: (709) 772-6022 or |
Manitoba Canada Business Service Centre Tel: (204) 984-2272 or |
Prince Edward Island Tel: (902) 368-0771 or |
Saskatchewan Tel: (306) 956-2323 or |
Nova Scotia Canada Business Service Centre Tel: (902) 426-8604 or |
Alberta Canada Business Service Centre Tel: (403) 495-6800 or |
New Brunswick Canada Business Service Centre Tel: (506) 444-6140 or |
British Columbia Canada Business Service Centre Tel: (604) 775-5525 or |
Note: Businesses in the Northwest Territories should direct their enquiries to the Manitoba CBSC. Businesses in the Yukon should contact the Alberta CBSC. |
Cohen, G., Nigel. (1992). The Business Plan - Approved. Vandenburghs Chartered Accountants.
Cohen, William A. (1995). Model Business Plans for Service Business. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Global LifeSkills Inc. (1995). How to Start or Improve Your Own Business: Your Home Office and Small Business Program. (Information package and video)
Mancuso, Joseph R. (1993). How to Prepare and Present a Business Plan.
Prentice Hall Press.