This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
I am pleased to present the 2010-2011 Departmental Performance Report of the Public Service Commission (PSC) of Canada. The PSC is an independent agency reporting to Parliament, mandated to safeguard the integrity of public service staffing system and the political neutrality of the public service. We also recruit qualified Canadians from across the country and living abroad.
This reporting period is the last for this Commission and, for the PSC, my final year as President. Three senior executives also retired and succession is under way as part of our transition planning.
Our first corporate priority, as set out in our Report on Plans and Priorities, was to play a leadership role in the review of the Public Service Modernization Act (PSMA) through an evidence-based assessment of the implementation of the Public Service Employment Act (PSEA), including recommendations for change. The PSC has worked in close partnership with the PSMA Review Team on the formal legislative review. Our Special Report, entitled "Merit and Non-partisanship under the Public Service Employment Act (2003)", was tabled in Parliament on March 22, 2011. The report provides the Commission's assessment based on five years of operation of the PSEA and it made recommendations on what we feel is required to improve the system and ensure that Canadians continue to benefit from a professional, merit-based and non-partisan public service.
Our second priority was to provide independent oversight and assurance to Parliament on the integrity of the staffing system and the non-partisanship of the Federal Public Service. Effective oversight is fundamental to the PSC's accountability to Parliament. An independent review committee examined the PSC's oversight activities and, in its January 2009 report, the committee made a series of recommendations such as improving stakeholder communications, streamlining its monitoring and audit functions and further engaging our partners. All recommendations have been addressed; some have been completely implemented, while others have been successfully integrated into ongoing operations. We have designed these initiatives to improve oversight in our highly-delegated staffing model and enhance the PSC's accountability to Parliament.
Our third priority was to provide integrated and modernized staffing and assessment services. In the four years since our increased authority for cost recovery, our cost recovery operations have nearly doubled. During 2010-2011, we revamped our Post-Secondary Recruitment campaign, targeting specific career streams that will facilitate the process for Canadians applying for federal jobs. In partnership with the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, departments and agencies, we secured permanent funding for the Public Service Resourcing System, our electronic recruitment system. We worked with Human Resources and Skills Development Canada on an approach to transfer the internal staffing component of Publiservice to the PSC, paving the way for the full integration of external and internal staffing systems. Moving forward, a new three-year business plan was developed to guide the evolution of the PSC as a centre of expertise in staffing and assessment services.
Our fourth priority was to build on the PSC as a model organization. Further progress was made in developing specific action plans based on our on-line employee engagement surveys and the setting of a 100% target for completion of Employee Learning Plans and Employee Performance Evaluations. Extensive preparatory work was undertaken with respect to the PSC's relocation to Gatineau in 2013.
During this reporting period, the PSC also implemented budget reductions resulting from the horizontal strategic review of human resources management and the freeze on operating budgets. Through prudent spending, realizing further operational efficiencies and extending our cost recovery operations, we were able to achieve the necessary budget reductions.
I would like to take this opportunity to recognize the progress that has been made in implementing the vision enshrined in the PSEA and the invaluable role that all stakeholders have played in achieving this aim.
Our impressive achievements would not have been possible without the steadfast support and dedication of PSC employees at all levels of the organization. I am confident that they will continue to uphold the mandate of the PSC, which is fundamental to maintaining a professional and non-partisan public service, recognized internationally for its excellence.
Maria Barrados, PhD
President
August 29, 2011
The Public Service Commission (PSC) is dedicated to building a public service that strives for excellence. We protect merit, non-partisanship and the use of both official languages, while ensuring respect for the values of fairness, access, transparency and representativeness.
We recruit talented Canadians from across the country and living abroad and renewed our recruitment services to meet the needs of a modern and innovative public service.
On behalf of Parliament, the PSC safeguards the integrity of staffing and the non-partisan nature of the public service. In this respect, the PSC works closely with government but is independent from ministerial direction and is accountable to Parliament.
The PSC is mandated to:
The PSC Program Activity Architecture consists of one strategic outcome and four program activities.
Government of Canada Spending and Outcome Area | Government Affairs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Safeguarding and fostering the integrity and political neutrality of public servants | |||||
PSC – Program Activity Architecture | Strategic Outcome | To provide Canadians with a highly competent, non-partisan and representative public service, able to provide service in both official languages, in which appointments are based on the values of fairness, access, transparency and representativeness | |||
Activities | 1.1.0 Appointment Integrity and Political Neutrality |
1.2.0 |
1.3.0 Staffing Services and Assessment |
2.1.0 Internal Services |
|
Sub-activities | 1.1.1 Policy, Regulation and Exclusion Approval Orders |
1.2.1 Monitoring |
1.3.1 Staffing Services |
2.1.1 Governance and Management Support |
|
1.1.2 Delegated Appointment Authorities |
1.2.2 Audit, Evaluation and Studies ** |
1.3.2 Assessment |
2.1.2 Resource Management Services |
||
1.1.3 Non-delegated Authorities |
1.2.3 Investigations |
2.1.3 Asset Management Services |
|||
1.1.4 Political Activities |
* The name was changed to “Oversight of Integrity in Staffing” effective FY 2011-2012
** The name was changed to *Audit and Data Services* effective FY 2011-2012
Priority I | Type* | Program Activity |
---|---|---|
Play a leadership role in the review of the Public Service Modernization Act (PSMA) through an evidence-based assessment of the implementation of the Public Service Employment Act (PSEA), including recommendations for change. | New | 1.1.0 Appointment Integrity and Political Neutrality |
Status: Met all | ||
Progress in 2010-2011 against RPP planning key actions includes:
|
* “Type” is categorized as follows: Previously committed to—committed to in the first or second fiscal year before the subject year of the report; Ongoing—committed to at least three fiscal years before the subject year of the report; and New—newly committed to in the reporting year of the Departmental Performance Report (DPR).
Priority II | Type | Program Activity |
---|---|---|
Provide ongoing independent oversight and assurance to Parliament on the integrity of the staffing system and the non-partisanship of the federal public service. | Previously committed | 1.1.0 Appointment Integrity and Political Neutrality 1.2.0 Oversight of Integrity of Staffing and Political Neutrality |
Status: Met all | ||
Progress in 2010-2011 against RPP planning key actions includes:
|
Priority III | Type | Program Activity |
---|---|---|
Provide integrated and modernized staffing and assessment services. | Previously committed | 1.3.0 Staffing Services and Assessment |
Status: Mostly met | ||
|
Priority IV | Type | Program Activity |
---|---|---|
Build on the PSC as a model organization. | Revised | 2.1.0 Internal Services |
Status: Mostly met | ||
Progress in 2010-11 against RPP planning key actions includes:
The PSC conducted the sixth successive bi-annual Employee Engagement Survey, the results of which were used to continue to build on the PSC as a “model organization”. The results of the two surveys on employee engagement continue to show very positive results in several respects, especially in the areas of sense of contribution and working relationships.
Improvements recommended in the most recent SMAF and DSAR reports have been integrated into the development of our 2011-2014 Integrated HR Plan. A strong IT security program was developed to ensure the security of PSC information and assets.
|
The Corporate Risk Profile is developed each year as a key part of the PSC’s integrated risk management practice. An important decision-making tool, it provides information on risks confronting the PSC and appropriate responses to them.
In 2010-2011, the PSC made significant progress in documenting the integrated risk management process and improving results through risk identification, analysis, tracking and reporting.
Ten corporate risks, discussed in the 2010-2011 RPP, were identified and aligned with the PSC’s four priorities. The following outlines how these risks unfolded over the fiscal year, what was learned and what adjustments were made.The non-partisanship of the public service is a key tenet of the Canadian governance model. Under the PSEA, the PSC is responsible for independently safeguarding the non-partisanship of the public service and overseeing the regime established under Part 7 of the Act regarding political activities of public servants. In 2010-2011, the PSC engaged selected Parliamentarians in discussion about how the PSC implements its responsibilities to protect the non-partisanship of the public service. The PSC also examined the results of its 2009 and 2010 Surveys of Staffing (Candidates) regarding public servants’ level of awareness of their rights and legal responsibilities under Part 7, commissioned a study of existing surveys and other research on the perceptions Canadians have of the role of the public service and examined approaches used in other jurisdictions to help clarify the relationship between the political sphere and the public service.
In addition to its own Special Report to Parliament, which included the results of independent consultation with experts in the field of public management, the PSC also contributed to the TBS-led review of the PSMA. Both activities were supported by the PSC's evidence-based assessment of the PSEA and included recommended areas for attention. The effective working relationships with departments and key central agencies will ensure a common understanding of the progress made to date and the work left to do in order to fully realize the objectives of the PSEA, as stated in its preamble.
With regard to its commitment to helping organizations meet their staffing and assessment needs, the PSC continued to look at ways to improve its product and service offerings, both mandatory and optional.
In particular, the Staffing and Assessment Services Branch (SASB) developed a three-year Business Plan for 2011-2014 that places emphasis on clients and the importance of delivering quality services to better support the needs of departments and agencies. It also takes into account the current fiscal environment and the need to integrate and streamline SASB processes and services, ensuring that, even if demand declines, the PSC service delivery model will remain viable.
A project management approach for service delivery activities was introduced to ensure timely, high quality service to clients. A national workload distribution protocol was established between service delivery units in order to better manage resources.
Another key to the success of SASB is ensuring confidence in the veracity of PSC testing materials, especially related to their currency and security. New measures to enhance the security of its testing instruments were introduced and a multi-year innovation project to develop and implement computer generated testing for its suite of Second Language Evaluation (SLE) tests was also launched.
Funding was secured for PSRS to ensure that the PSC can deliver and adequately maintain a national e-recruitment system for 2011-2012 and beyond. A strong and inclusive governance structure to guide PSRS decisions was also established. Steps were put in place in collaboration with Human Resources and Skills Development Canada to obtain approval to transfer the internal staffing component of Publiservice to the PSC.
The PSC successfully implemented budget reductions and the spending constraints for 2010-2011 and developed a multi-year plan to address future year reductions while maintaining the core activities required for meeting its mandate.
The PSC is establishing an Enterprise Datate Warehouse and implementing a set of standard approaches for access, manipulation and storage of key PSC data holdings used for analysis of the staffing system. These activities are improving the PSC’s capacity to provide complete and accurate reports to Parliament.
It is important that the PSC continue to engage and develop its workforce. Thus, the PSC developed action plans based on its on-line employee engagement surveys and set a 100 percent target for employee Learning Plans and Performance Evaluations. It also instituted a formal succession planning initiative at high risk levels of the Executive cadre and feeder groups.
Finally, there had been concern about the need to ensure an efficient transition from the current Commission to a new one. A detailed transition plan was developed in 2010-2011 for implementation in 2011-2012. This will ensure knowledge transfer and the continuity of core Commission business.The PSC’s Corporate Risk Profile and mitigation strategies are located in the publications section of the PSC Web site.
Planned Spending | Total Authorities | Actual Spending |
---|---|---|
98,962 | 105,022 | 100,975 |
The above numbers represent the utilization of the authorities on a cash basis. The Audited Financial Statements (page 32) present the information on an accrual accounting basis.
Planned | Actual | Difference |
---|---|---|
1,030 | 968 | 62 |
Overall, the PSC achieved the results it planned for 2010-11.
For the reporting period, PSC expenditures were $100,975 thousand against total authorities of $105,022 thousand, resulting in an under-expenditure of $4,047 thousand appearing in the Public Accounts of Canada. The under-expenditure is mainly due to delays in staffing and in the implementation of some projects. There were also reductions in the actual expenditures pertaining to the travel, telecommunications and professional services.
The following is a summary of expected results and financial resources associated with each program activity that contributes to the achievement of the PSC’s strategic outcome. The performance status of each expected result is indicated below.
Strategic outcome: To provide Canadians with a highly competent, non-partisan and representative public service, able to provide service in both official languages, in which appointments are based on the values of fairness, access, transparency and representativeness.
The PSC has one strategic outcome. The achievement of this strategic outcome has been measured through evidence-based performance information.
A selection of PSC performance information is provided in the table below. The indicators and targets are extracted from the Performance Measurement Framework that the PSC revised subsequent to the publication of the RPP 2010-2011.
A complete list of the Performance Information Related to the Public Service Values in Support of the PSC Strategic Outcome is included in Section IV. Additional information is contained in the PSC Annual Report 2010-2011.
Indicators | Target | 2010-2011 Performance |
---|---|---|
Staffing Management Accountability Framework (SMAF) | ||
Composite assessment of three key success factors: delegation of staffing to deputy heads, planning for staffing and monitoring of results and organizational HR support | Increased or maintained percentage of organizations that have implemented the necessary infrastructure Baseline 2009-2010: 55% compliancy |
Based on the 2010-2011 SMAF assessment results, 74% of organizations with more than 100 employees were compliant |
Merit | ||
Managers’ satisfaction with the quality of hires | Baseline 2009-2010: 80% | Of managers who indicated, in the PSC Survey of Staffing – Managers: 2010 that they had sufficient opportunity to observe the performance of the appointee Eighty-five percent of managers were satisfied to a great extent with the quality of the hire for the last position that they staffed during the reporting period |
Non-partisanship | ||
PSC investigations related to the political activities of public servants | Number of investigations compared to previous year | In 2010-2011, the PSC received a total of 10 new requests to investigate allegations related to improper political activities, as compared to 16 such requests in the previous year. Three cases were completed through full investigation and only one was determined to be founded |
Fairness | ||
Percentage of indeterminate hires coming from:
|
Baseline 2009-2010:
|
Of the indeterminate hires in 2009-2010:
|
Access | ||
Percentage of external appointments that are non-advertised:
|
Baseline 2009-2010:
|
Based on information from central sources:
|
Transparency | ||
Organizational staffing priorities and strategies are communicated on organizations’ Web sites and contents are clearly communicated to managers, employees and employees' representatives, where applicable | Baseline 2009-2010: 70% |
Based on the 2010-2011 SMAF assessment results: Eighty-five percent of organizations with more than 100 employees clearly communicated organizational staffing priorities and strategies |
Representativeness | ||
Staffing-related provisions or initiatives to increase representativeness | Baseline 2009-2010: 80% |
Based on 2010-2011 SMAF assessment results: Eighty percent of organizations with more than 100 employees used EE provisions in staffing processes or staff related initiatives to enhance representativeness |
Program Activity | 2009–2010 Actual Spending ($ thousands) |
2010–2011 ($ thousands) | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcome | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
|||
1.1.0 Appointment Integrity and Political Neutrality | 11,671 | 11,112 | 12,835 | 11,681 | 11,567 | Government Affairs – Well-managed and efficient government operations. |
1.2.0 Oversight of Integrity of Staffing and Political Neutrality | 21,240 | 22,063 | 22,379 | 22,479 | 22,246 | |
1.3.0 Staffing Services and Assessment | 35,494 | 28,672 | 29,729 | 31,808 | 29,182 | |
Total | 68,405 | 61,847 | 64,943 | 65,968 | 62,995 |
Program Activity | 2009–2010 Actual Spending ($ thousands) |
2010–2011 ($ thousands) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
||
2.1.0 Internal Services | 38,363 | 37,115 | 34,019 | 39,054 | 37,980 |
The above numbers represent the utilization of the authorities on a cash basis. The Audited Financial Statements (page 32) present the information on an accrual accounting basis.
As part of Canada's Economic Action Plan (CEAP), the PSC has spent the funding received to enhance federal public service student employment in the amount of $70K (horizontal item as part of Budget 2009).
The PSC’s spending trend from 2008-2009 through 2010-2011 is illustrated in Figure 1. Total spending consists of the net spending (appropriated) amount plus net voting revenues. The PSC has Treasury Board approval to use cost recovery for assessment services of up to $14 million.
The CEAP expenditure was $70K in 2010-2011.
CEAP annual expenditures of less than $1,000,000 do not appear on this chart.
For information on our organizational Votes and/or statutory expenditures, please see the 2010–2011 Public Accounts of Canada (Volume II) publication. An electronic version of the Public Accounts is available on the Public Works and Government Services Canada Web site – see Public Accounts of Canada 2010.