Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Symbol of the Government of Canada

ARCHIVED - Canada Border Services Agency - Supplementary Tables

Warning This page has been archived.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.





2009-10
Departmental Performance Report



Canada Border Services Agency






Supplementary Information (Tables)






Table of Contents




Sources of Respendable and Non-Respendable Revenue

Respendable Revenue
($ thousands)
Program
Activity
Actual
2007-081
Actual
2008-091
2009-10
Main
Estimates
Planned
Revenue2
Total
Authorities
Actual
 Enforcement
Services of a non-regulatory nature3 208 205     226 226
Total – Enforcement 208 205     226 226
 Facilitated Border
Services of a regulatory nature4 3,569 3,408 810 810 3,449 3,449
Services of a non-regulatory nature 399 393 102 102 433 433
Total – Facilitated Border 3,968 3,801 912 912 3,882 3,882
 Conventional Border
Rights and privileges1 2,140 1,603 1,586 1,586 1,607 1,607
Services of a regulatory nature 1,955 1,867 1,865 1,865 1,890 1,890
Services of a non-regulatory nature 12,463 12,285 13,347 13,347 13,526 13,526
Total – Conventional Border 16,558 15,755 16,798 16,798 17,023 17,023
Total Respendable Revenue 20,734 19,761 17,710 17,710 21,131 21,131

1 Actual revenues for 2007-08 and 2008-09 were restated to be comparable to 2009-10 actual revenues to reflect the changes made to the CBSA's Program Activity Architecture.
2 The planned revenue of $314,000 published in the CBSA’s 2009–10 Report on Plans and Priorities (under Internal Services) is now reflected under the Conventional Border program activity.
3 Services of a non-regulatory nature include, for instance, detector dog training services, contractual arrangements for the provision of new and enhanced non-core border management services and the collection of taxes on behalf of the provinces.
4 Services of a regulatory nature (the fee is set by regulation for a service provided by or on behalf of Her Majesty in right of Canada to users of the service) include, for instance, revenues earned from enrolment in facilitated border programs such as NEXUS and Fast and Secure Trade, and from food inspection fees.


Non-Respendable Revenue
($ thousands)
Program
Activity
Actual
2007-081
Actual
2008-091
2009-10
Main
Estimates
Planned
Revenue
Total
Authorities
Actual
 Risk Assessment
Adjustments to prior year’s expenditures 147 52   188   50
Total – Risk Assessment 147 52   188   50
 Enforcement
Services of a regulatory nature 1,379 2,882   -   2,098
Interest and penalties 405 312   507   311
Adjustments to prior year’s expenditures 86 31   111   29
Revenue from fines 1,212 559   1,551   1,099
Seizures 21,716 46,661   28,294   11,495
Other 2,554 2,243   2,991   1,718
Total – Enforcement 27,352 52,688   33,454   16,750
Facilitated Border
Adjustments to prior year’s expenditures 64 23   82   22
Total – Facilitated Border 64 23   82   22
Conventional Border
Services of a regulatory nature 484 1,012   -   737
Interest and penalties 29,749 22,892   37,261   22,859
Adjustments to prior year’s expenditures 352 126   451   120
Seizures 19 41   25   10
Other 1,599 1,405   1,873   1,076
Total – Conventional Border 32,203 25,476   39,610   24,802
Trade
Adjustments to prior year’s expenditures 33 1   43   11
Total – Trade 33 1   43   11
 Recourse
Adjustments to prior year’s expenditures 2 1   3   1
Total – Recourse 2 1   3   1
Internal Services
Adjustments to prior year’s expenditures 1,920 685   2,458   653
Lease and use of public property 337 342   431   3
Other 569 500   667   383
Total – Internal Services 2,826 1,528   3,556   1,039
Total Non-Respendable Revenue 62,627 79,780   76,936   42,675

1 Actual revenues for 2007-08 and 2008-09 were restated to be comparable to 2009-10 actual revenues to reflect the changes made to the CBSA's Program Activity Architecture.
2 The 2009–10 planned revenue has been adjusted to better reflect the Agency's distribution of non-respendable revenue.



User Fees Reporting

A. User Fees


User Fee: Customs Broker Licence Fee and Professional Examination Fee

Fee Type: Regulatory

Fee-setting Authority: Customs Act

Date Last Modified: 1992

Performance Standards: Correctly completed applications for new customs broker licences will be processed within four months. (Note: $600 annual licence fee applies.) Results of broker's professional examination will be provided within six weeks. (Note: $200 examination fee applies.)

Performance Results: 100 percent of licence applications and examination results were provided within standard time frames.


($ thousands)
2009-10 Planning Years
Forecast Revenue Actual Revenue Full Cost Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue Estimated Full Cost
377 349 300 2010-11 375 300
2011-12 375 300
2012-13 375 300

 

 

User Fee: Customs Sufferance Warehouse Licence Fee

Fee Type: Regulatory

Fee-setting Authority: Customs Act

Date Last Modified: 2006

Performance Standards: The CBSA will process a new sufferance warehouse licence within 60 business days from the date of receipt of a correctly completed application that meets all the requirements of the Customs Sufferance Warehouses Regulations. (Note: $500 annual licence fee applies.)

Performance Results: 100 percent of all applications that were fully completed according to the requirements of the Customs Sufferance Warehouses Regulations were processed within 60 business days.


($ thousands)
2009-10 Planning Years
Forecast Revenue Actual Revenue Full Cost Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue Estimated Full Cost
600 415 760 2010-11 550 775
2011-12 550 775
2012-13 550 775

 

User Fee: Customs Bonded Warehouse Licence Fees

Fee Type: Regulatory

Fee-setting Authority: Customs Tariff

Date Last Modified: 1996

Performance Standards: The operator will receive a notice of determination within four weeks after a verification or examination.

Performance Results: The operator will receive a notice of determination 100 percent of the time within four weeks after a verification or examination.


($ thousands)
2009-10 Planning Years
Forecast Revenue Actual Revenue Full Cost Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue Estimated Full Cost
500 367 1,555 2010-11 500 1,600
2011-12 500 1,600
2012-13 500 1,555

 

User Fee: Storage Charges for Queen's and Frontier Warehouses

Fee Type: Regulatory

Fee-setting Authority: Customs Act

Date Last Modified: 2006

Performance Standards: The CBSA will ensure that goods are handled with care and stored in a secure manner to safeguard against damage or loss while at a Frontier Examining Warehouse or Queen's Warehouse.

Performance Results: 21 successful claims were made against the Crown for damage or loss.


($ thousands)
2009-10 Planning Years
Forecast Revenue Actual Revenue Full Cost Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue Estimated Full Cost
100 16 492 2010-11 20 499
2011-12 20 499
2012-13 20 499

 

User Fee: Customs Special Services Fee

Fee Type: Regulatory

Fee-setting Authority: Customs Act

Date Last Modified: 1986

Performance Standards: The CBSA will acknowledge requests for special services within one working day of receipt and provide an estimated time frame for service provision. Upon completion of the service, a detailed invoice will be provided itemizing the completed special services and the associated fees for these services, ensuring transparency and consistency in the Agency's billing process.

Performance Results: The CBSA acknowledged 94.08 percent of requests for special services within 24 hours and 99.14 percent of clients received a detailed invoice.


($ thousands)
2009-10 Planning Years
Forecast Revenue Actual Revenue Full Cost Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue Estimated Full Cost
220 69 626 2010-11 200 644
2011-12 200 644
2012-13 200 644

 

User Fee: Canadian Food Inspection Agency Fees Notice

Fee Type: Regulatory

Fee-setting Authority: Canadian Food Inspection Agency Act

Date Last Modified: 1997

Performance Standards: Inspection activities are provided in accordance with corresponding federal regulations.

Performance Results: Inspection activities are provided in accordance with corresponding federal regulations.


($ thousands)
2009-10 Planning Years
Forecast Revenue Actual Revenue Full Cost Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue Estimated Full Cost
2,150 1,874 159 2010-11 2,250 200
2011-12 2,250 200
2012-13 2,250 200

 

User Fee: NEXUS Program Application Fee

Fee Type: Regulatory

Fee-setting Authority: Customs Act

Date Last Modified: 2007

Performance Standards: There is a four- to six-week application processing time.

Performance Results: Approximately 80 percent of applications are processed within four to six weeks.


($ thousands)
2009-10 Planning Years
Forecast Revenue Actual Revenue Full Cost Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue Estimated Full Cost
3,560 2,939 21,871 2010-11 2,814 15,351
2011-12 3,036 15,351
2012-13 4,136 15,351

 

 

User Fee: Free and Secure Trade (FAST) Program Application Fee

Fee Type: Regulatory

Fee-setting Authority: Customs Act

Date Last Modified: 2007

Performance Standards: There is a four- to six-week application processing time.

Performance Results: Approximately 80 percent of applications are processed within four to six weeks.


($ thousands)
2009-10 Planning Years
Forecast Revenue Actual Revenue Full Cost Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue Estimated Full Cost
425 511 15,705 2010-11 425 15,705*
2011-12 425 15,705*
2012-13 425 15,705*

*The full costs and estimated full costs include an estimate for other government departments. These figures represent the best available cost data. The participating other government departments in the Free and Secure Trade program (FAST) from 2008 to 2012 are the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service.

 

User Fee: CANPASS Air Program Application Fee

Fee Type: Regulatory

Fee-setting Authority: Customs Act

Date Last Modified: 2002

Performance Standards: There is a four- to six-week application processing time.

Performance Results: Approximately 80 percent of applications are processed within four to six weeks.


($ thousands)
2009-10 Planning Years
Forecast Revenue Actual Revenue Full Cost Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue Estimated Full Cost
270 433 3,700 2010-11 270 3,700
2011-12 270 3,700
2012-13 270 3,700

 

User Fee: Fees Charged for Processing Access Requests Filed Under the Access to Information Act

Fee Type: Other products and services

Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act

Date Last Modified: 1992

Performance Standards: The CBSA provides a response within 30 days following the receipt of request. The response time may be extended pursuant to Section 9 of the Access to Information Act. A notice of extension is sent within the initial 30 days after the receipt of request. The Act provides more details.

Performance Results: In 2009–10, the CBSA received 1,257 requests under the Access to Information Act. The Agency continues to experience a higher than anticipated volume of requests. The CBSA processed 95.30 percent of requests within the statutory time frames.


($ thousands)
2009-10 Planning Years
Forecast Revenue Actual Revenue Full Cost Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue Estimated Full Cost
8 6 1,332 2010-11 7 2,000
2011-12 7 2,190
2012-13 8 2,230

Please note that, according to prevailing legal opinion, where the corresponding fee introduction or most recent modification occurred before March 31, 2004:

  • the performance standard, if provided, may not have received parliamentary review;
  • the performance standard, if provided, may not respect all establishment requirements under the User Fees Act (e.g. international comparison, independent complaint address); and
  • the performance result, if provided, is not legally subject to Section 5.1 of the User Fees Act regarding fee reductions for unachieved performance.

B. User Fees Totals


($ thousands)
  2009-10 Planning Years
Forecast Revenue Actual Revenue Full Cost Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue Estimated Full Cost
Subtotal (R) 8,202 6,973 45,168 2010-11 7,404 38,774
2011-12 7,626 38,774
2012-13 8,726 38,729
Subtotal (O) 8 6 1,332 2010-11 7 2,000
2011-12 7 2,190
2012-13 8 2,230
Total 8,210 6,979 46,500 2010-11 7,411 40,774
2011-12 7,633 40,964
2012-13 8,734 40,959

C. External Fees


External Fee Service Standard1 Performance Results2 Stakeholder Consultation
Broker licensing and examination fees Licences processed within four months and examination results received within six weeks. Standards are met 100 percent of the time. Standards are set in consultation with customs broker associations.
Customs sufferance warehouse licence fees Application processed within 60 business days. 100 percent of all applications that were fully completed according to the requirements of the Customs Sufferance Warehouses Regulations are processed within 60 business days. Consultation undertaken through the Border Commercial Consultative Committee.
Customs bonded warehouse licence fees Operator receives notice of determination within four weeks after a verification or examination. Operator receives notice of determination 100 percent of the time within four weeks after a verification or examination. Consultation undertaken through the Border Commercial Consultative Committee.
Storage charges for Queen's and Frontier Warehouses Goods to be handled with care and stored in a secure manner to safeguard against damage or loss. 21 successful claims made against the Crown for damage or loss.  
Customs special services fees The CBSA will acknowledge a request for special services within one working day of receipt, and provide a likely time frame for service provision. Upon completion of the service, a detailed invoice will be provided that itemizes the completed special services and the associated fees for these services, ensuring transparency and consistency in the CBSA's billing process. The CBSA acknowledged 94.08 percent of requests for special services within 24 hours and 99.14 percent of clients received a detailed invoice. Given the uniqueness of these requests and that special services are mostly performed on an ad-hoc basis, stakeholder consultations are performed on a client-by-client basis when requests are submitted.
Canadian Food Inspection Agency Fees notice Inspection activities are provided in accordance with corresponding federal regulations. Inspection activities are provided in accordance with corresponding federal regulations.  
NEXUS Program Four to six weeks The CBSA processed 80 percent within four to six weeks. The performance results provided reflect the Canadian part of the application process up to inviting applicants to attend an in-office interview to finalize their enrolment. The CBSA will review the existing published performance standards for processing applications with its partner (U.S. Customs and Border Protection) and consult with stakeholders to clarify the processing standards and adjust the time frames as required. Revised time frames will be made public on the Internet and in program brochures and guides.
Free and Secure Trade (FAST) Program Four to six weeks The CBSA processed 80 percent within four to six weeks. The performance results provided reflect the Canadian portion of the application process up to inviting applicants to attend an in-office interview to finalize their enrolment. The CBSA will review the existing published performance standards for processing applications with its partner (U.S. Customs and Border Protection) and consult with stakeholders to clarify the processing standards and adjust time frames as required. Revised time frames will be made public on the Internet and in program brochures and guides.
Fees charged for processing access requests filed under the Access to Information Act Response is provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to Section 9 of the Access to Information Act. Notice of extension to be sent within initial 30 days after receipt of request. The Act provides more details. In 2009–10, the CBSA received 1,257 requests under the Access to Information Act. The Agency continues to experience a higher than anticipated volume of requests. The CBSA processed 95.30 percent of requests within the statutory time frames. The service standard is established by the Act and the Access to Information Regulations. The Department of Justice and the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat undertook consultations with stakeholders regarding amendments made in 1986 and 1993.
CANPASS Program Four to six weeks The CBSA processed 80 percent within four to six weeks. The performance results provided reflect the Canadian part of the application process up to inviting applicants to attend an in-office interview to finalize their enrolment. The CBSA will review the existing published performance standards for processing applications with its partner (U.S. Customs and Border Protection) and consult with stakeholders to clarify the processing standards and adjust time frames as required. Revised time frames will be made public on the Internet and in program brochures and guides.

1 As established pursuant to the Policy on Service Standards for External Fees:

  • service standards may not have received parliamentary review; and
  • service standards may not respect all performance standard establishment requirements under the User Fees Act (e.g. international comparison, independent complaint address).

2 Performance results are not legally subject to Section 5.1 of the User Fees Act regarding fee reductions for unachieved performance.



Status Report on Projects Operating with specific Treasury Board Approval

($ thousands)
Project Original Estimated
Total Cost1
Revised Estimated
Total Cost2
Actual
Cost Total3
2009-10
Main
Estimates
Planned
Spending4
Total
Authorities5
Actual Expected Date of
Close-out6
Risk Assessment
Initial Planning and Identification                
eManifest 356,401 356,401 149,989 88,031 88,031 86,681 55,069 2013-14
Harmonized Risk Scoring / Advance Trade Data 33,289 33,289 11,160 6,364 6,364 9,362 4,590 2010-11
Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative 2,278 2,278 612     1,029 293 2011-12
Implementation                
Business Resumption Planning 94 94 110 94 94 94 110 2009-10
Total – Risk Assessment 392,062 392,062 161,870 94,489 94,489 97,166 60,062  
Facilitated Border
Implementation                
Business Resumption Planning 225 225 219 225 225 225 219 2009-10
Air Cargo Security 2,900 2,900 2,345     2,900 2,345 2009-10
Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative – NEXUS 13,805 13,805 14,945     5,374 6,825 2009-10
Total – Facilitated Border 16,930 16,930 17,509 225 225 8,499 9,389  
Conventional Border
Initial Planning and Identification                
Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative 3,645 3,645 1,324     1,650 814 2012-13
eManifest 39,600 39,600 16,665 9,781 9,781 9,631 6,119 2013-14
Biometrics 4,198 4,198 3,053     4,198 3,053 2011-12
Total – Conventional Border 47,443 47,443 21,043 9,781 9,781 15,479 9,986  
Internal Services
Initial Planning and Identification                
Rigaud, Quebec 54,000 57,574 4,472     5,274 2,120 2012-13
Non-housing infrastructure 70,000 70,000 1,157     4,000 1,157 2011-12
Housing infrastructure 10,000 10,000 436     2,500 436 2010-11
Aldergrove, B.C 15,000 12,000 154 1,000 1,000 300 38 2011-12
Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative 875 875 218     397 95 2012-13
Harmonized Risk Scoring / Advance Trade Data 5,575 5,575 1,477 1,066 1,066 1,568 377 2010-11
Biometrics 747 747 327     747 327 2011-12
Implementation                
Business Resumption Planning 23,644 23,644 19,483 3,527 3,527 3,527 3,688 2009-10
Andover, N.B. 6,445 6,445 7,902 500 500 500 464 2010-11
St. Stephen, N.B. 21,508 21,508 22,714 992 992 1,362 1,362 2010-11
Douglas, B.C 45,000 45,000 47,451 1,053 1,053 950 825 2011-12
Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative – NEXUS 7,150 7,150 2,727     3,021 1,098 2009-10
Close-out                
Stanstead, Route 55 (Rock Island, Quebec) 18,000 18,000 17,878 174 174 178 178 2009-10
Cascade, B.C. 2,980 2,980 3,154 30 30 30 30 2009-10
Fraser, B.C. 1,400 2,046 2,852 28 28 40 40 2009-10
Total – Internal Services 282,324 283,544 132,422 8,370 8,370 24,394 12,235  
TOTAL 738,759 739,979 332,844 112,865 112,865 145,538 91,672  

 

1 Very first Treasury Board Expenditure Authority decision for total project cost.
2 Most recent Treasury Board Expenditure Authority decision for total project cost.
3 All expenditures to date including the current year.
4 Planned Spending includes Main Estimates.
5 Includes Main Estimates, Supplementary Estimates and Internal Transfers.
6 Fiscal year: Final year before project enters ongoing maintenance phase.

Notes:

  1. Due to the CBSA’s revised Program Activity Architecture structure, program activity information is not available for the fiscal years before 2009-10. As a result, total amounts are restated based on 2009-10 information.
  2. Where costs for individual projects are attributable to many program activities, only the most significant ones have been identified.


Status Report on Major Crown/Transformational Projects

eManifest

1. Description

One of the strategies that the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) employs in managing the border is the use of advance information to identify and stop high-risk people and goods before they arrive in Canada. Having successfully implemented the marine and air components of the Advance Commercial Information initiative, the CBSA is now implementing Phase III, which is known as Electronic Manifest, or eManifest.

eManifest is the next critical step required to improve the ability of the CBSA to detect shipments that pose a high or unknown risk to the safety and security of Canadians. The objective of eManifest is to implement electronic processes based on advance electronic cargo information to effectively analyze risk, ensure efficient border procedures and secure the international trade supply chain. Under eManifest, highway and rail carriers, along with freight forwarders and importers in all modes, will transmit advance cargo, conveyance, crew and importer trade data before the arrival of the cargo at the border. eManifest will complement and build upon the risk management strategies currently employed in both the air and marine modes, by enhancing the risk assessment capacity and scoring methodologies for all modes. This initiative focuses on pushing the border out by getting the right information at the right time to protect Canadians from health, safety and security threats related to commercial goods before they arrive in Canada.

eManifest will feature the following:

  • reporting using electronic data interchange,
  • a Web portal,
  • automated risk assessment,
  • an enhanced client notification system,
  • a data warehouse and associated business intelligence tools, and
  • compliance management and management information reporting.

2. Project Phase

eManifest has multiple components in various project phases; some elements have been implemented and others are in the analysis and design and construction and development phases.

3. Leading and Participating Departments and Agencies

Lead Department

Canada Border Services Agency

Contracting Authority

Canada Revenue Agency and Public Works and Government Services Canada

Participating Departments

N/A

4. Prime and Major Subcontractor(s)

Prime Contractor N/A
Major Subcontractor(s) N/A

5. Major Milestones

Major Milestone Date
  • Readiness activities – Information technology prerequisites and deployment of the Synchronous Technology and Application Release configuration

Implemented November 2007

  • Readiness activities Automated in-transit pilot project (Phase I)

Implemented June 2008

  • Rail reporting (Phase I)

Implemented March 2009

  • Highway In-Transit Pilot (Phase II)
  • Customs electronic commerce platform capacity upgrade

Implemented October 2009

  • Highway carrier reporting
  • Client notification
  • Passage (interim enhancements for highway)
  • Infrastructure capacity upgrade (Phase I)

Summer 2010

  • Highway Web portal
  • Infrastructure capacity upgrade (Phase II)

Winter 2011

  • Risk assessment (air)
  • Rail reporting (Phase II)
  • Passage (interim enhancements for rail)
  • Commercial reporting

Spring 2011

  • Highway reporting – Secondary cargo
  • Client notification (broker download)
  • Passage (interim enhancements for freight forwarders)
  • Business intelligence and data warehouse infrastructure (freight forwarders)
  • Commercial reporting

Summer 2011

  • Highway Web portal (freight forwarders)
  • Commercial reporting
  • Infrastructure capacity upgrade (Phase III)

Winter 2011

  • Highway reporting – Importer advance trade data
  • Client notification
  • Highway Web portal (retrofit)
  • Passage (interim enhancements for importer advance trade data)

Spring 2012

  • Highway Web portal (importer advance trade data)
  • Upgrade for marine and air crew reporting
  • Infrastructure capacity upgrade (Phase IV)

Spring 2013

  • Risk assessment – All modes (air, highway, marine and rail)

Winter 2013

  • Highway Web portal (reporting)
  • Passage (final implementation)

Summer 2014

  • Highway Web portal (crew data)
  • Highway crew reporting
  • Risk assessment (marine)
  • Business intelligence and data warehouse infrastructure (crew)

Winter 2014

6. Project Outcomes

eManifest will feature:

  • implementation of prerequisites activities for critical information technology,
  • advance electronic crew, cargo, conveyance and advance trade data information from highway and rail carriers, freight forwarders, importers and customs brokers,
  • a Web portal for clients to facilitate compliance,
  • automated risk assessment in advance of the arrival of goods to Canada's border,
  • streamlined border processing through integration of systems for CBSA officers, and
  • development of a data warehouse and supporting business intelligence software, which will include the centralization and integration of data from various CBSA systems to support intelligent risk assessment of eManifest pre-arrival information through pattern detection and trend analysis.

In addition, some of the products and features listed above will be retrofitted to the air and marine modes.

eManifest will enable:

  • enhanced knowledge and capacity to risk assess pre-arrival data and for trade community compliance,
  • enhanced cooperation with U.S. Customs and Border Protection through harmonized commercial processes,
  • enhanced innovative systems and technology to effectively and efficiently assess data,
  • increased success of detection activities to intercept high-risk goods and travellers,
  • increased compliance by trade community with CBSA legislation,
  • enhanced flow of low-risk people and goods, and
  • improved stakeholder satisfaction.

7. Progress Report and Explanations of Variances


  • eManifest received effective project approval from Treasury Board on November 29, 2007 as a major Crown project with an approved budget of $396 million (net of goods and services tax) over five years.
  • Subsequent to effective project approval, the project completion date was revised to reflect a shift in project funding over two years, as part of the CBSA’s contribution in support of Canada’s Economic Action Plan. The impact of the funding realignment has extended the completion date and necessitated a realignment of project deliverables and implementation time frames.
  • As a result of the extended time frame, eManifest’s funding profile required a reallocation of funds for 2012–14 where there was no Treasury Board funding originally allocated.
  • Agency reference levels still reflect preliminary project approval funding amounts. This has resulted in annual internal carry-forwards to align funding to effective project approval plans.
  • Expenditures were reduced in 2009–10 as a result of a re-profile of project funding to future years (2012–14). The realignment of funding is attributed to a delay in the implementation of business intelligence and data warehouse infrastructure technology, a delay in the deployment of the Passage system at first point of arrival and associated costs related to the uptake of highway carriers. Synergies of staffing among the CBSA’s major projects have also been realized.
  • eManifest is to be completed by 2015.

In 2009–10, the eManifest project team made significant progress in carrying out various project activities. Highlights included:

  • Bill S-2, an Act to amend the Customs Act, received Royal Assent on June 11, 2009. This Bill contains modifications to the requirements for advance commercial reporting that provide the Agency with the authority to mandate that carriers, importers and freight forwarders, in all modes of transportation, provide the CBSA with electronic shipment information before arrival in Canada.
  • The eManifest Business Intelligence Strategy and road map were approved in July 2009. A data governance framework and a data stewardship group have been established, which will standardize the use of data and data definitions to ensure future data quality and linkages to business ownership.
  • The Highway In-Transit Pilot was successfully tested and was implemented into CBSA production systems as of October 4, 2009. This enhancement supports linkages between the existing commercial systems of the CBSA and U.S. Customs and Border Protection. To accompany the system upgrades, the CBSA and U.S. Customs and Border Protection will work cooperatively to communicate information related to in-transit cargo shipments.

The 2009–10 reporting period also included significant stakeholder engagement activities related to the implementation of eManifest in the highway mode and the deployment of the Web portal in 2010–11. These activities included:

  • the distribution of the electronic commerce client requirements document for highway carriers to the trade community for discussion and finalization, and
  • the gathering of stakeholders and agency representatives through the eManifest Stakeholder Partnership Network and other consultative forums to discuss eManifest design, development, implementation and communication activities.

8. Industrial Benefits

As eManifest will help provide CBSA officers with the right information at the right time, Canadian industry will benefit from more certainty at the border and from streamlined release processes. This will enable both industry and the CBSA to manage commercial import volumes more effectively. In addition, eManifest functionality will enable the seamless movement of goods through secure, international trade-supply chains. With improved controls along the international trade-supply chains, the CBSA can more efficiently allocate resources to ensure that integrated border services further national security and safety priorities, while facilitating the free flow of low-risk people and goods.

Air Cargo Security

1. Description

The primary objective of the Air Cargo Security Program is to develop a comprehensive air cargo security regime in Canada that is in line with international partners and that will mitigate the risks associated with the introduction of explosives in cargo or mail and the use of cargo aircraft as weapons. Supply chain programs to identify low-risk cargo will be developed and procedures to screen high-risk and targeted cargo will be identified.

Transport Canada is the lead for the Air Cargo Security Program; the CBSA is a participating department. Only CBSA information is provided below.

2. Project Phase

In 2009–10, priority initiatives of the Air Cargo Security Program were implemented.

3. Leading and Participating Departments and Agencies

Lead Department Transport Canada
Contracting Authority Public Works and Government Services Canada and the Canada Revenue Agency
Participating Departments Canada Border Services Agency

4. Prime and Major Subcontractor(s)

Prime Contractor n/a
Major Subcontractor(s) n/a

5. Major Milestones

Major Milestone Date

Privacy impact assessment

Ongoing

Interim technology standards released

July 31, 2009

Secure supply chain management system contract resolution

September 18, 2009

High-risk cargo defined

September 15, 2009

Air cargo security measures released

August 28, 2009

Economic analysis (initial)

August 31, 2009

Memorandum of Understanding completed

To be done after the privacy impact assessment is completed

Memorandum to Cabinet draft completed

December 3, 2009

Treasury Board submission draft (next phase)

Completed May 2010

Regulatory standards completed

January 31, 2010

Remote air sampling completed for canine olfaction test bed

May 7, 2010 (anticipated)

Costruzioni elettroniche industriali automatismi test bed completed

May 21, 2010 (anticipated)

Air cargo security measures effective

March 31, 2010

6. Project Outcomes

Air travellers will benefit from this program. Benefits include:

  • enhanced regulatory regime;
  • oversight, training and compliance;
  • screening technologies and processes;
  • mutual recognition and interoperability;
  • support for risk assessments undertaken by Transport Canada; and
  • screening of air cargo items at small and remote Class II and Class Other airports.

7. Progress Report and Explanations of Variances

The current Treasury Board submission was signed in August 2009. Milestones such as the privacy impact assessment and the Memorandum of Understanding are expected to be completed in early 2010–11.

8. Industrial Benefits

  • Protect the Canadian public and those working in the air cargo supply chain.
  • Streamline trade through risk management.
  • Promote the movement of goods both domestically and internationally through effective trade supply chains.
  • Improve the ability of the CBSA to detect high-risk cargo.
  • Improve controls and make better and more efficient allocations of CBSA resources.
  • Ensure the efficient flow of goods contributing to Canada’s economic prosperity.

Temporary Resident Biometrics

1. Description

The Temporary Resident Biometrics Project is a Citizenship and Immigration Canada-led major Crown project, in partnership with the CBSA and RCMP. The objective of the project is to streamline identity management within the Government of Canada’s Temporary Resident Program. Against the backdrop of the rise of identity fraud globally and the use of ever more sophisticated means to evade detection, a key challenge in Canada’s immigration program is identifying applicants and managing their identity with confidence. The Temporary Resident Biometrics Project is not aimed at a re-engineering of processes and systems, but rather an enhancement to existing visa, study and work permit applications and visitor entry processes, and leveraging the investment in existing systems of Citizenship and Immigration Canada, the CBSA and RCMP to the maximum extent possible.

Budget 2008 provided the CBSA with funding in the amount of $12.7 million. Using this funding, the CBSA will design and develop a photo verification solution at all ports of entry, as well as a solution for discretionary biometric verification in secondary inspection at selected ports of entry. The CBSA is currently on schedule to implement the above-noted work components by March 2013.

2. Project Phase

The Temporary Resident Biometrics Project is currently in the analysis and design phase.

3. Leading and Participating Departments and Agencies

Lead Department

Citizenship and Immigration Canada

Contracting Authority

Public Works and Government Services Canada

Participating Departments

CBSA and RCMP

4. Prime and Major Subcontractor(s)

Prime Contractor n/a
Major Subcontractor(s) n/a

5. Major Milestones

Major Milestone Date

Business requirements for Phase 1 (re-scoped option)

April 2010

Business use cases for Phase 1 (re-scoped option)

Summer 2010

System requirements for Phase 1 (re-scoped option)

June 2010

System use cases for Phase 1 (re-scoped option)

Fall 2010

Memorandum to Cabinet

Fall 2010

Posting of the request for proposal

November 2010

Effective project approval submission

December 2010

Evaluating responses to the request for proposal

January 2011 to March 31, 2011

6. Project Outcomes

  • Migration that significantly benefits Canada’s economic, social and cultural development, while protecting the health, safety and security of Canadians. Related program activities: the Immigration Program and the Temporary Resident Program.
  • International recognition and acceptance of the principles of managed migration consistent with Canada’s broader foreign policy agenda, and protection of refugees in Canada. Related program activities: Canada’s role in international migration and protection, and the Refugee Program.
  • Successful integration of newcomers into society and promotion of Canadian citizenship. Related program activities: the Integration Program and the Citizenship Program.
  • Canada’s population is safe and secure from border-related risks. Related program activities: Port of entry operations (Conventional Border).
  • Legitimate travellers and goods move freely and lawfully across the border. Related program activities: Port of entry operations (Conventional Border).

Beneficiaries

  • The affected client groups are primarily applicants for temporary resident visas. In 2006, Citizenship and Immigration Canada received over 1.2 million applications abroad in the temporary immigration program. The volume of temporary applications has been increasing in recent years and is estimated to reach roughly 1.6 million by 2012.
  • Canadian society will be the prime beneficiary of this initiative. Strengthened identity management will provide increased security and reduce the abuse of the Immigration Program. These are key elements of ensuring the safety, security and health of Canadian society and maximizing the economic benefits of immigration. A March 2007 survey by Ipsos Reid found that 88 percent of Canadians were supportive of the use of biometrics in verifying the identity of foreign nationals applying for visas, and 90 percent supported conducting background checks on foreign nationals seeking to enter Canada.

7. Progress Report and Explanations of Variances

  • With the $12.7 million that the CBSA received in Budget 2008, the project has been re‑scoped to include only photo verification at all Canadian ports of entry, and discretionary fingerprint verification in secondary inspection at selected ports of entry.
  • Amended preliminary project approval was received in April 2010.
  • Various documents in support of overall project management have been prepared, such as a project charter. In addition, business requirements and business use cases to support the reduced scope are well underway.
  • Due to delays in the request for proposal process, the CBSA did not procure any equipment in 2009–10.
  • The CBSA is currently on schedule to design and develop photo verification at all Canadian ports of entry and discretionary biometric verification at secondary inspection at selected ports of entry.
  • The CBSA is currently operating within budget, as allocated by the Department of Finance Canada, for the reduced scope project option.
  • The CBSA will be ready to implement the reduced scope solution by March 31, 2013 as originally envisioned.

8. Industrial Benefits

Given the greater assurance of an individual’s identity due to the addition of biometrics, Canadian society will be the prime beneficiary of this initiative. Strengthened identity management will provide increased security and reduce the abuse of the Immigration Program. These are key elements of ensuring the safety, security and health of Canadian society and maximizing the economic benefits of immigration.



Horizontal Initiatives

Supplementary information on the CBSA's participation in horizontal initiatives can be found on the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat's Web site at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/hidb-bdih/home-accueil-eng.aspx.



Green Procurement

Meeting Policy Requirements


1. Has the department incorporated environmental performance considerations in its procurement decision-making processes?
Yes, and processes are updated as needed.
2. Summary of initiatives to incorporate environmental performance considerations in procurement decision-making processes:
  • Implementation of green procurement options into the Canada Border Services Agency’s Procurement Process Checklist to track the contracting process and to include the three pillars of sustainable development when contracting. 
  • Increase in the use of green standing offers for the procurement of goods and services.
  • Increase in green procurement awareness through training, conferences and activities.
  • Integration of green procurement in performance management agreements.
  • Development of policies and guidelines on green procurement, life-cycle asset management and the disposal of surplus materiel assets.
3. Results achieved:
  • The CBSA’s Procurement Process Checklist includes: 
    • using green standing offers;
    • dealing with vendors who are environmentally responsible, e.g., the International Organization of Standardization ISO14000; and
    • developing and implementing environmental clauses in all contracting documents.
  • Headquarters procurement officers have successfully completed the online Canada School of Public Service C215 green procurement course.
  • There is heightened awareness of best practices related to green procurement through increased attendance at and participation in governmental greening conferences.
  • During Environment Week 2010, procurement staff received daily e-mails which resulted in increased awareness of greening opportunities.
  • The Agency included green procurement training in its acquisition card training for new card holders.
  • The CBSA’s contracting officers used double-sided printing and recycled paper for all printing.
  • The Agency initiated the inclusion of green procurement commitments in the performance management agreements of the Manager of Contracting, Manager of Assets, Manager of Telecommunications and Manager of Policy.
  • The Agency developed packaging policies aimed at reducing waste, such as returning packaging and any recyclable materials, and has included these policies in contracts when requisitioning the delivery of goods.
  • The CBSA encouraged vendors to offer products and services that are environmentally-friendly by including environmental requirements in the evaluation criteria. 
  • The CBSA is developing a Centralized Total Asset Management Framework that consolidates policies and procedures; it now includes the disposal stage of the life-cycle approach. The planning, acquisition and use stages of the approach are in development.
  • The Agency has completed the policy and guidelines for managing the disposal of surplus materiel assets such as e-waste disposal methods. 

4. Contributions to facilitate government-wide implementation of green procurement:
  • Creation of CBSA-specific documents such as the Procurement Process Checklist, the Centralized Total Asset Management Framework, and various policies, to support the Government of Canada’s Green Procurement Policy.
  • Participation in the federal and CBSA Sustainable Development Strategy dialogue, as well as related planning and reporting processes.

Green Procurement Targets

5. Has the department established green procurement targets?
Yes.
6. Summary of green procurement targets:
  • Maximize the purchase of goods and services using green consolidated procurement instruments (as designated by Public Works and Government Services Canada).
  • Increase employee awareness of and train procurement personnel on green procurement policies and procedures.
  • Develop and implement a life-cycle approach to asset management.
  • Ensure the purchase of goods and services are aligned with the Government of Canada’s Green Procurement Policy. 
7. Results achieved:
  • The CBSA integrates the following criteria within goods and services contracts to reduce:
    • greenhouse gas emissions and air contaminants;
    • ozone-depleting substances;
    • waste and supporting reuse and recycling;
    • hazardous waste; and
    • toxic and hazardous chemicals and substances.
  • The CBSA uses Public Works and Government Services Canada standing offers to purchase vehicles and environmentally-friendly assets. The CBSA increased the number of smart cars and/or hybrids owned as part of an initiative to reduce greenhouse gases. The Agency now has 21 hybrid cars and two smart cars.
  • Headquarters procurement officers successfully completed the online Canada School of Public Service C215 green procurement course.
  • The Agency regularly communicated with employees through articles published in the national employee information bulletin (INSight) which detailed how the CBSA is working to become more environmentally-friendly. Examples of information provided include:
    • printing on paper containing recycled content;
    • dealing with suppliers who have a certification or registration (ISO) number;
    • working with contractors using the Environmental Management System;
    • recycling used batteries; and
    • buying environmentally-friendly vehicles.
  • The CBSA initiated a Centralized Total Asset Management Framework in 2009 that incorporates environmental factors into the planning, acquisition, use and disposal of goods and services. 
  • The Agency developed policies and guidelines related to life-cycle asset management.
  • The CBSA is adhering to the requirements of the Government of Canada’s Policy on Green Procurement by:
    • using Public Works and Government Services Canada standing offers, where available;
    • consulting the green procurement guidelines on the Web site of the Office of Greening Government Operation; and
    • utilizing the CBSA’s Report on Plans and Priorities, Departmental Performance Report, and Sustainable Development Strategy to plan for and report on green procurement performance.



Response to Parliamentary Committees and External Audits

Response to Parliamentary Committees

The Standing Committee on Public Accounts conducted a review of Chapter 5 (“Keeping the Border Open and Secure”) of the October 2007 Report of the Auditor General of Canada. The Committee tabled its report on February 25, 2009 and made four recommendations:

  1. The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) should provide a status report on the implementation of the audit recommendations.
  2. The CBSA should include its risk management strategies in the 2008–09 Departmental Performance Report.
  3. The CBSA should include the status of its training models in the 2008–09 Departmental Performance Report.
  4. The CBSA should review the fees process to ensure no additional charges are levied for random inspections.

The CBSA’s response to the Standing Committee on Public Accounts was tabled in August 2009 and is found at http://www2.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?DocId=4017698&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=40&Ses=2

The Standing Committee on Public Accounts also conducted a review of the Office of the Auditor General’s audit of the CBSA’s management of the detentions and removals programs. The Committee tabled its report in May 2009 and made nine recommendations:

  1. The CBSA should develop a detailed action plan to implement the recommendations of the May 2008 audit by the Office of the Auditor General, along with the recommendations in the 2003 audit that remain unresolved. This action plan should be provided to the Committee by June 30, 2009.
  2. The CBSA should provide an interim status report to the Committee on its progress in implementing the Office of the Auditor General’s and the Committee’s recommendations by June 30, 2010.
  3. The CBSA should continue to develop its national training and monitoring framework to ensure that temporary resident permits are properly documented, and report to the Committee by September 30, 2009 on the implementation of the framework.
  4. The CBSA should develop regional detention capacity to ensure that decisions on detention are being made consistent with the risks posed to the public, and provide the Committee with a detailed plan on how to address the regional detention capacity issue by December 31, 2009.
  5. The CBSA should provide an interim status report to the Committee by December 31, 2009 on its ongoing negotiations with the provinces on the use of provincial detention facilities, including timelines for when it anticipates that the agreements will be concluded, and provide the Committee with a final report on negotiated agreements by December 31, 2011.
  6. The CBSA should take immediate steps to ensure that detainees are held in adequate facilities in the event of overcapacity, and allow the Canadian Red Cross to monitor conditions at a national level.
  7. The CBSA should undertake a broad review of the extent to which individuals are complying with the conditions of their release and whether non-compliance is resulting in undue risk to the public, and report back to the Committee with a summary of its findings and a remedial action plan by March 31, 2010.
  8. The CBSA should study the feasibility of using reciprocal information-sharing agreements with foreign governments, or an exit tracking system, to ascertain whether foreign nationals have left Canada.
  9. The CBSA and Citizenship and Immigration Canada should report to the Committee by September 30, 2009 on the current status of the Global Case Management System and the implementation of the required upgrades to the National Case Management System, including when the National Case Management System is expected to be fully operational.

The CBSA’s response to the Standing Committee on Public Accounts was tabled in September 2009 and is found at http://www2.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?DocId=4097637&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=40&Ses=2

Response to the Auditor General (including to the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development)

N/A

External Audits

The Public Service Commission of Canada conducted an Audit on the Canada Border Services Agency that was made public in October 2009. The Audit made the following six recommendations:

  1. The President of the CBSA should ensure that its integrated human resources plan provides direction to managers and human resources professionals on how to make decisions concerning their staffing activities by:
    1. outlining staffing priorities that are strategically linked to organizational risks and business plans;
    2. providing staffing strategies to guide decisions on when and how to staff positions, based on the Public Service Employment Act; and
    3. providing measurable expected results for staffing.
  2. The President of the CBSA should ensure that the Agency’s resourcing monitoring framework is fully implemented. This will assist the Agency in assessing its staffing management practices, performance and controls, and making adjustments, as required, to achieve the Agency’s human resource objectives.
  3. The President of the CBSA should provide the Public Service Commission with the Agency’s action plan resulting from its appointment file review. This action plan should describe the actions to be taken including corrective measures, accountabilities, timelines and how the progress of the implementation of the action plan will be monitored.
  4. The President of the CBSA should establish an evaluation process to help identify training requirements for sub-delegated managers to ensure that those who are sub-delegated are and remain competent to exercise their appointment and appointment-related authorities.
  5. The President of the CBSA should clarify roles and responsibilities for appointment and appointment-related activities between the Agency’s branch management services units and the Human Resources Branch to help ensure that sub-delegated managers have timely access to appropriate human resources advice.
  6. The President of the CBSA should require the successful completion of the Public Service Commission’s Appointment Framework Knowledge Test, within the Personnel Administration Development and Apprenticeship Program, to support sub-delegated managers having access to a CBSA human resources specialist whose expertise in the Appointment Framework has been validated by the Public Service Commission.

The audit report and the CBSA response to each recommendation are found at http://www.psc-cfp.gc.ca/adt-vrf/rprt/2009/acbsa-vasfc/index-eng.htm.



Internal Audits

Name of Internal Audit Audit Type Status Completion Date
Customs Self Assessment Program Assurance Completed April 2009
Section 33 – Financial Administration Act procedures Assurance Completed April 2009
Business continuity plans Assurance Completed November 2009
CBSA / Canadian Food Inspection Agency memorandum of understanding for food, animal and plant inspections Assurance Completed June 2009
Commercial permit enforcement Assurance Completed November 2009
Audit of information technology services contracts Assurance Completed November 2009
Governance and strategic direction Assurance Cancelled  
Occupational health and safety Assurance Completed September 2009
Financial Management Framework Assurance Completed April 2010
System under development – eManifest Assurance Completed September 2009
Year-end cash cut-off procedures for 2008–09 Assurance Completed September 2009
Values and Ethics program Assurance Cancelled  
Revenue ledger Assurance Completed June 2009
Acquisition card control framework Assurance Completed January 2010
Payroll controls Assurance Completed January 2010
CBSA / Citizenship and Immigration Canada Memorandum of Understanding Assurance In progress 2010
Form K84 process and accounting Assurance In progress 2010
Asset management investment plan Assurance Cancelled  
Protection and privacy of personal information Assurance Deferred  
Training and development Assurance Planned 2011
Duties Relief Program – Drawbacks Assurance In progress 2010
Free and Secure Trade Assurance Deferred  
Employer-employee relationship – contractors Assurance In progress 2010
Harmonized Risk Scoring / Advance Trade Data Assurance In progress 2011
Advance Passenger Information / Passenger Name Record data from airlines Assurance In progress 2010
Postal operations Assurance Cancelled  
Controls on seized identity documents (Immigration and Refugee Protection Act) Assurance In progress 2010
Accelerated Commercial Release Operations Support System controls Assurance In progress 2010
Laboratory services Assurance In progress 2010
eManifest Phase II Assurance In progress 2010
Year-end cash cut-off procedures for 2009–10 Assurance In progress 2010
Management of information technology security Assurance In progress 2011
Container Security Initiative Assurance Cancelled  
Process to share intelligence information internally Assurance Planned*  
Arming Initiative (change management strategy) Assurance Planned*  
Compliance verification programs Assurance Deferred  
Customs-controlled forms Assurance Cancelled  
Process Monitoring Framework Assurance Planned*  
Biometrics Assurance Planned*  
Management of overtime Assurance Planned*  
Accounts receivable Assurance Planned*  
Procurement – service standards Assurance Planned*  
Physical security of CBSA facilities Assurance Cancelled  
Security management framework Assurance Planned*  
Policy on management of government information holdings Assurance Planned*  

*The completion dates of these audits will be determined in 2010–11.

Internal Evaluations

Name of Evaluation Program Activity Evaluation Type Status Completion Date
Admissibility screening and supporting intelligence activities Risk Assessment  Summative Completed July 2009
Remote border location programs: CANPASS Remote Area Border Crossing, CANPASS Remote Ports, CANPASS Private Boats Plus and CANPASS Q19 Facilitated Border  Summative Completed July 2009
Arming Initiative Enforcement Implementation/
Impact
Completed November 2009
Relevance and operation of the CBSA fleet Internal Services  Summative Completed November 2009
CBSA-licensed warehouse programs: sufferance and customs bonded warehouses Trade / Conventional Border  Summative Completed February 2010
2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games (The CBSA is participating in this evaluation, which is led by the RCMP.) Conventional Border Implementation Completed March 2010
National Anti-Drug Strategy
(The CBSA is participating in this evaluation, which is led by the Department of Justice.)
Enforcement / Internal Services Implementation Completed March 2010
Security certificates initiative
(The CBSA is participating in this evaluation, which is led by Public Safety Canada.)
Enforcement Implementation/
Impact
Completed March 2010
Cross-border currency reporting
(The CBSA is participating in this evaluation, which is led by the Department of Finance under the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act.)
Enforcement Summative In progress December 2010
Criminal investigations (Immigration and Refugee Protection Act) Enforcement Summative In progress August 2010
Information technology desktop services for CBSA end users Internal Services Summative In progress August 2010
Clearance of commercial passenger vessels Conventional Border / Risk Assessment Summative In progress October 2010
Detention and removals programs Enforcement Summative In progress October 2010
Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative Conventional Border Summative In progress December 2010
Partners in Protection Enforcement Summative In progress December 2010
Integrated Proceeds of Crime initiative (The CBSA is participating in this evaluation, which is led by Public Safety Canada.) Enforcement Summative In progress December 2010
Investments to Combat the Criminal Use of Firearms initiative (The CBSA is participating in this evaluation, which is led by Public Safety Canada.) Enforcement Summative In progress December 2010
2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games (The CBSA is participating in this evaluation, which is led by the RCMP.) Conventional Border Summative In progress March 2011
G-8 and G-20 summits (The CBSA is participating in this evaluation, which is led by the RCMP.) Conventional Border Summative In progress March 2011
Temporary Foreign Worker Program (The CBSA is participating in this evaluation, which is co-led by Citizenship and Immigration Canada / Human Resources and Skills Development Canada.) Enforcement Summative In progress March 2011