This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
Supplementary Information (Tables)
($ millions) | Actual 2005–06 |
Actual 2006–07 |
2007–08 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Revenue |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
|||
Program Activity 2: Sustainability of Cultural Expression and Participation |
||||||
Canadian Audio-Visual Certification Office (CAVCO) | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.5 |
Program Activity 3: Preservation of Canada's Heritage |
||||||
Canadian Conservation Institute (CCI) | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
Program Activity 4: Access and Participation in Canada's Cultural Life |
||||||
Canadian Conservation Institute (CCI) | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.4 |
Total Respendable Revenue | 4.9 | 4.7 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 5.3 |
($ millions) | Actual 2005–06 |
Actual 2006–07 |
2007–08 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Revenue |
Total Authorities |
Actual |
|||
Non-Respendable Revenue | ||||||
Federal-Provincial Lottery Agreement | 62.1 | 62.8 | N/A | 62.1 | N/A | 62.8 |
Total Non-Respendable Revenue | 62.1 | 62.8 | 0.0 | 62.1 | 0.0 | 62.8 |
Total Revenue | 67.0 | 67.5 | 5.2 | 67.3 | 5.2 | 69.1 |
A. User Fee | Fee Type | Fee-Setting Authority | Date Last Modified | 2007–2008 | Planning Years | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue ($000) | Actual Revenue ($000) | Full Cost ($000) | Performance Standard | Performance Results | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue ($000) | Estimated Full Cost ($000) | ||||
Fees charged for processing access requests filed under the Access to Information Act | Other products and services | Access to Information Act | 1992 | See Note 1 | 4.8 | 470 See Note 4 |
Response provided within 30 days of receipt of request. Response time may be extended pursuant to s. 9 of the Act. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days of receipt of request. For details: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/a-1/8.html | See Note 2 | 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 |
See Note 3 See Note 3 See Note 3 |
470 See Note 5 See Note 5 |
B. Date last modified: (N/A) | |||||||||||
C. Other information: (N/A) |
* Note : According to prevailing legal opinion, where the corresponding fee introduction or most recent modification occurred prior to March 31, 2004 the:
Note: This figure cannot be provided as revenue is based on actual information requests received under the Access to Information Act.
Note 2 : Taking into account external factors, 80% of requests were completed within the prescribed time frame.
Note 3 : This figure cannot be provided as revenue is based on information requests received under the Access to Information Act.
Note 4 : This figure consists of salary and O & M costs in relation to the administration of the Access to Information Act.
Note 5 : Budget information not provided in advance. Cannot provide figures for 2009–2010 and 2010–2011.
A. External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Result | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Fees charged for processing access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA) | Response provided within 30 days of receipt of request. Response time may be extended pursuant to s. 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days of receipt of request. For details of the Act: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/a-1/218072.html. |
80% of requests were completed within the prescribed time. Complex requests require additional time. |
This service standard is established by the ATIA and its Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments done in 1986 and 1992. |
B. Other Information: Website on Access to Information: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/a-1/8.html Website on Access to Information Regulations: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/a-1/sor-83-507/45.html |
A. External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Result | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Certification Fees. | CAVCO is committed to issuing Certificates within 10 weeks of receiving a complete application. | CAVCO met its performance standards more than 90% of the time. 616 applications were deemed complete; all certified within 10 weeks, in fact, 16% of completed applications were certified within 5 weeks. | Our most recent client survey indicates a high level of satisfaction among stakeholders. |
B. Other Information N/A. |
A. External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Special publications and products Special publications and products prices are determined by comparing market prices and prices of other CCI publications, and by considering the size, content, and printing costs for the product. |
CCI responds to general questions or requests about service within 2 working days if requests are telephoned or e-mailed to Publications Sales or to Customer Service; or sent through online forms on the CCI or the "Preserving My Heritage" websites. CCI processes publications and special products orders within a week of receiving payment. Packaging materials and procedures ensure that less than 2% of its material arrives defective. |
Data unavailable until September 2009. (Note B1) | N/A |
Learning opportunities-workshops CCI offers 14 workshops costing $500 each. Clients are eligible for one regional workshop per fiscal year. Additional workshops are available at $500 each plus all expenses (transportation, accommodation, daily allowance, travel time, materials, transportation, and equipment rental). |
CCI maintains an overall client satisfaction rate of 95%, based on 11 quality parameters. (Note B2). CCI responds to general questions or requests about service within 2 working days if requests are telephoned or e-mailed to Publications Sales or to Customer Service; or sent through online forms on the CCI or the "Preserving My Heritage" websites. CCI responds to new requests within 3 weeks. Clients are notified of acceptance or rejection within 8 weeks and informed of whatever terms, conditions, and fees apply. For regional workshops, clients are notified of acceptance or rejection within 8 weeks of the December 1 application deadline. |
99% would recommend the course to someone else. Satisfaction with each workshop ranged from 99%–100%. |
Provincial museum representatives took part in a consultation organized by CCI in February, 2008, to identify clients needs and set up the programming for the 2008–2009 workshops |
Library services Photocopies, facsimiles, book and video cassette loans: no fees for Canadian clients and libraries; small fees for foreign clients: US$10 for up to 20 pages (including shipping and handling); US$.20 for each additional page; facsimiles: US$1 per page; Loans: US$10 per book (including shipping and handling). Replacement costs for loss or damage: cost of the item plus a $50 processing fee. |
CCI responds to general questions or requests about service within 2 working days if requests are telephoned or e-mailed to Publications Sales or to Customer Service; or sent through online forms on the CCI or the "Preserving My Heritage" websites. CCI processes requests for photocopies, books or facsimile transmissions within 1 week of receiving the request. |
100% of requests are processed within 1 week. | N/A |
B. Other information: B1: Preservation information management system: Under preparation: due to technical difficulties, the system will be unavailable until 2009–2010. Proteus, CCI's existing system, can only partly verify processing times and cannot give exact data on effective response times by type of service. B2: Quality parameters (client satisfaction survey): Processing of the request, acknowledgment of receipt of the initial request, explanation of fees, explanation of service provided, communications in the course of the project, speed of service, quality of service, usefulness of service, quality of documents supplied (reports), attitude of personnel (friendly, courteous, competent), overall value. B3: Client categories: CCI places clients in 18 categories to determine eligibility for various services and fees payable. |
All these transfer payments programs are voted, which means that each year the Parliament of Canada votes annual Appropriation Act or Acts to grant expenditure authority to the Crown for the departments and agencies. This spending authorization lapses at year-end.
Citizenship and Heritage Sector
Cutural Affairs Sector
International and Intergovernmental Affairs and Sport Sector
Public and Regional Affairs Sector
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Aboriginal Peoples' Program | |||||||
2. Start Date: 1971–1972 | 3. End Date: 2009–2010 | ||||||
4. Description: The Aboriginal Peoples' Program focuses primarily on encouraging full Aboriginal participation in Canadian life and supporting the continuation of Aboriginal living cultures as key elements of
the Canadian cultural landscape. Specifically, the Aboriginal Peoples' Program
The program has three components:
|
|||||||
5. Strategic Outcomes: Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world. Canadians live in an inclusive society built on intercultural understanding and citizen participation. |
|||||||
6. Results Achieved: The Aboriginal Peoples' Program aims to support and enhance Aboriginal cultural participation and inclusion, which ultimately enhances broader social and economic outcomes. Gaps exist between the life experience of Aboriginal peoples and that of non-Aboriginal people. Research suggests that without programs to preserve and promote Aboriginal cultures, programs aimed solely at improving the economic or social conditions of Aboriginal peoples is insufficient. Health, education, and labour market outcomes for Aboriginal peoples are best achieved when culture and social inclusion are supported. Key risk factors that influenced the program were capacity issues, including financial, human resource, and capital resource issues; delivery models, including third-party delivery and accessibility to organizations and beneficiaries; late payment of funds, which can result in the loss of trained or experienced workers and cancelled or compromised projects. Key results achieved by the Aboriginal Peoples' Program included:
|
|||||||
In millions of $ | 7. Actual Spending 2005–06 | 8. Actual Spending 2006–07 | 9. Planned Spending 2007–08 | 10. Total Authorities 2007–08 | 11. Actual Spending 2007–08 | 12. Variance(s) Between 9 and 11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13. Program Activity: Sustainability of Cultural Expression and Participation | |||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total contributions | - | - | - | 4.9 | - | - | |
14. Total Program Activity | 108.7 | 186.9 | 163.1 | 209.2 | 184.6 | (21.5) | |
13. Program Activity: Preservation of Canada's Heritage |
|||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total contributions | 19.9 | 20.2 | 21.6 | 16.8 | 19.5 | 2.1 | |
14. Total Program Activity | 20.4 | 20.5 | 21.9 | 17.1 | 19.8 | 2.1 | |
13. Program Activity: Community Development and Capacity Building |
|||||||
Total Grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total Contributions | 21.6 | 5.5 | 8.7 | 11.8 | 0.2 | 8.5 | |
14. Total Program Activity | 252.8 | 227.0 | 230.7 | 247.7 | 234.0 | (3.3) | |
13. Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life |
|||||||
Total Grants | 0.3 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.9 | |
Total Contributions | 24.6 | 39.6 | 34.7 | 24.4 | 39.4 | (4.7) | |
14. Total program Activity | 107.9 | 149.7 | 145.3 | 143.2 | 133.6 | 11.7 | |
15. Total TPP | 1,015.7 | 1,150.3 | 1,098.2 | 1,157.5 | 1,117.9 | (19.7) | |
16. Comments on variance(s): Overall variance of $12.4 million is explained as follows:
|
|||||||
17. and 18. Significant audit and evaluation findings and URL(s) to last audit/evaluation: Summative Evaluation of the Aboriginal Friendship Centre Program (May 18, 2005) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Evaluation of Aboriginal Representative Organizations Program (May 18, 2005) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Evaluation of Aboriginal Women's Program (February 24, 2005) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Audit of the Aboriginal Languages Initiative (October 20, 2004) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Audit of the Canada/Territorial Co-operation Agreements for Aboriginal Languages (October 20, 2004) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Audit of the Urban Multipurpose Aboriginal Youth Centres Initiative (UMAYC) (February 25, 2004) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Audit of the Aboriginal Friendship Centres Program (AFCP) (February 25, 2004) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Evaluation of the Urban Multipurpose Aboriginal Youth Centres Initiative (UMAYC) (October 22, 2003) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Summative Evaluation of the Northern Native Broadcast Access Program (NNBAP) & Northern Distribution Program (June 25, 2003) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Follow-Up Audit of the Aboriginal Representative Organizations Program (June 25, 2003) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Follow-Up Audit of the Aboriginal Women's Program (June 25, 2003) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Summative Evaluation of the Aboriginal Languages Initiative (February 26, 2003) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm |
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Development of Official-Language Communities Program | |||||||
2. Start Date: 2003–2004 | 3. End Date: 2008–2009 | ||||||
4. Description: The Development of Official-Language Communities Program fosters the vitality of Canada's English- and French-speaking minority communities and enables them to participate fully in all aspects of Canadian life. Partnerships and agreements with community organizations, provinces, territories, municipalities, and federal departments and agencies, enhance the capacity of minority official-language communities to have greater access to quality education and different programs and services in their language in their communities. | |||||||
5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians live in an inclusive society built on intercultural understanding and citizen participation. | |||||||
6. Results Achieved: The activities funded through the program contribute to standardizing French or English usage in minority official-language communities. The program funds initiatives brought forward by community organizations, and education and services in the minority language provided by provincial and territorial governments. In 2007–2008, Canadian Heritage invested over $233 million in the program. According to the 2006 census, the number of Francophones (persons with French as their first language) outside Quebec is relatively stable at 997 000 individuals, compared to 988 000 in 2001. For the first time since 1976, the number of people in Quebec whose first official language spoken is English has increased from 919 000 in 2001 to 995 000. Even language transfers towards English among Francophones in minority communities has slowed, although the rate is still significant: 39% of Francophones in minority communities speak English at home more often, compared to 38% in 2001. (Statistics Canada, 2007, First Official Language Spoken (7), Mother Tongue (10), Age Groups (17A), and Sex (3) for the Population of Canada, Provinces, Territories, Census Metropolitan Areas and Census Agglomerations, 2006 Census, No. 97-555-XWF200603.) Despite the relatively stable linguistic growth in recent years, major challenges have yet to be overcome to develop living environments in minority official languages. In spite of the modest rise in the number of Francophones living in a minority situation, their share of the population decreased from 4.4% to 4.2% due to the arrival of immigrants, most of whom do not have French as their first official language spoken. The Survey on the Vitality of the Official-Language Minorities confirmed that outside of Québec only in some parts of New Brunswick and Ontario do French-speaking adults speak French predominantly every day. Also, outside of Québec, 56% of children of eligible parents are enrolled in French elementary schools and 47% in French secondary schools. (Statistics Canada, 2007, Minorities Speak Up: Results of the Survey of the Vitality of Official-Language Minorities, No 91-548–;X, p. 16, p. 21, p. 28, p. 30, p.55) Recognizing the challenges ahead, the Government of Canada announced $30 million in additional funding over two years, from 2007–2008 to 2008–2009, in the March 2007 federal budget to show its commitment to linguistic duality and the development of these communities. Of this total, $26 million is dedicated to cultural and extracurricular activities and community centres in official‑language communities. In 2007–2008, investments increased the number of opportunities for young members of official-language minority communities to live daily in their language. The funding was invested in capital projects such as the School Community Centre in Dubreuileville, Northern Ontario; the second phase of Cité francophone in Edmonton, Alberta; and a Collège Boréal campus in Timmins, Ontario. Additional investments support community initiatives that will allow young people to live and grow in their language and to improve their leadership skills. These skills will enrich not only minority communities, but also Canadian society. For instance, the funding was used to organize
|
|||||||
In millions of $ | 7. Actual Spending 2005–06 | 8. Actual Spending 2006–07 | 9. Planned Spending 2007–08 | 10. Total Authorities 2007–08 | 11. Actual Spending 2007–08 | 12. Variance(s) Between 9 and 11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13. Program Activity: Community Development and Capacity-Building | |||||||
Total grants | 5.0 | 5.2 | 35.6 | 33.8 | 7.2 | 28.5 | |
Total contributions | 226.2 | 216.3 | 186.3 | 202.1 | 226.7 | (40.3) | |
14. Total Program Activity | 252.8 | 227.0 | 230.7 | 247.7 | 234.0 | (3.3) | |
15. Total TPP | 1,015.7 | 1,150.3 | 1,098.2 | 1,157.5 | 1,117.9 | (19.7) | |
16. Comments on variance(s): Overall variance of $11.8 million is explained as follows:
|
|||||||
17. and 18. Significant audit and evaluation findings and URL(s) to last audit/evaluation: Formative Evaluation of the Interdepartmental Partnership with Official Language Communities (IPOLC) Component of the Promotion of Official Languages Program (October 22, 2003) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Evaluation of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Component of the Promotion of Official Languages Program (October 22, 2003) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Evaluation of the Support for Official Language Communities Program (A component of the Promotion of Official Languages Program) (June 25, 2003) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Evaluation of the Official Languages in Education Program (June 25, 2003) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Audit Official Languages in Education and the Intergovernmental Collaboration Component of the Promotion of the Official Languages Program (June 25, 2003) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm |
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Enhancement of Official Languages | |||||||
2. Start Date: 2003–2004 | 3. End Date: 2008–2009 | ||||||
4. Description: The Enhancement of Official Languages program promotes among Canadians a better understanding and appreciation of the benefits of linguistic duality. It achieves this through partnerships and agreements with the provinces and territories, and with non-governmental organizations to support second-language learning and initiatives that foster understanding between Anglophone and Francophone Canadians, and encourage the public to recognize and support linguistic duality as a fundamental value of Canadian society. | |||||||
5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians live in an inclusive society built on intercultural understanding and citizen participation. | |||||||
6. Results Achieved: In 2007–2008, Canadian Heritage invested close to $118 million in the program, primarily for cooperation with the provinces and territories to improve core and immersion second-language programs, recruit and train teachers, and encourage the continuation of second-language learning at the post-secondary level. The Department also supported promotional and outreach activities to foster a better understanding of the advantages of knowing both official languages.
|
|||||||
In millions of $ | 7. Actual Spending 2005–06 | 8. Actual Spending 2006–07 | 9. Planned Spending 2007–08 | 10. Total Authorities 2007–08 | 11. Actual Spending 2007–08 | 12. Variance(s) Between 9 and 11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13. Program Activity: Promotion of Inter-Cultural Understanding | |||||||
Total grants | 0.4 | 0.2 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 0.5 | 5.1 | |
Total contributions | 106.5 | 115.1 | 102.5 | 104.5 | 117.8 | (15.2) | |
14. Total Program Activity | 106.8 | 130.3 | 108.1 | 110.1 | 118.3 | (10.2) | |
13. Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life | |||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Total contributions | 3.5 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.5 | (0.1) | |
14. Total Program Activity | 107.9 | 149.7 | 145.3 | 143.2 | 133.6 | 11.7 | |
15. Total TPP | 1,015.7 | 1,150.3 | 1,098.2 | 1,157.5 | 1,117.9 | (19.7) | |
16. Comments on variance(s): Overall variance of ($10 million) is explained as follows:
|
|||||||
17 and 18. Significant audit and evaluation findings and URL(s) to last audit/evaluation: Audit of the Support for Linguistic Duality Program and the Program for the Integration of Both Official Languages in the Administration of Justice (September 18, 2002 ) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm |
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Exchanges Canada Program | |||||||
2. Start Date: 2000–2001 | 3. End Date: 2009–2010 | ||||||
4. Description: The Exchanges Canada Program allows young Canadians to participate in exchanges and forums with other youth from across the country. The program also allows youth to obtain information about other kinds of exchanges possible in Canada and abroad. | |||||||
5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians live in an inclusive society built on intercultural understanding and citizen participation. | |||||||
6. Results Achieved: In 2007–2008, Exchanges Canada provided opportunities for approximately 13 900 youth to
|
|||||||
In millions of $ | 7. Actual Spending 2005–06 | 8. Actual Spending 2006–07 | 9. Planned Spending 2007–08 | 10. Total Authorities 2007–08 | 11. Actual Spending 2007–08 | 12. Variance(s) Between 9 and 11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13. Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life | |||||||
Total grants | - | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | - | 0.1 | |
Total contributions | 18.3 | 22.4 | 16.8 | 17.2 | 17.4 | (0.6) | |
14. Total Program Activity | 107.9 | 149.7 | 145.3 | 143.2 | 133.6 | 11.7 | |
15. Total TPP | 1,015.7 | 1,150.3 | 1,098.2 | 1,157.5 | 1,117.9 | (19.7) | |
16. Comments on variance(s): Overall variance of ($0.5 million) is explained as follows:
|
|||||||
17. and 18. Significant audit and evaluation findings and URL(s) to last audit/evaluation: Internal Audit of Exchanges Canada Program (February 2008) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/assurnc/2008/2008-01/index-eng.cfm Evaluation of Exchanges Canada Program (February 24, 2005) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Audit of Exchanges Canada (February 26, 2003) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm |
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Katimavik Program | |||||||
2. Start Date: 1997–1998 | 3. End Date: 2008–2009 | ||||||
4. Description: The mission of Katimavik is to foster the personal development of young Canadians through their participation in a challenging 39-week program, performing volunteer community work, training, and group interaction. Katimavik contributes largely to the personal, professional and social development of participants, aged 17 to 21, by promoting community service and offering a unique experience that promotes a better understanding of Canada's diversity. | |||||||
5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians live in an inclusive society built on intercultural understanding and citizen participation. | |||||||
6. Results Achieved: In 2007–2008, Katimavik allowed 972 young Canadians to engage in communities across the country in a unique service-learning and training program that fostered the development of their personal, social and professional skills and built their knowledge of Canada's geography, culture, and linguistic duality. Through their participation, they made a positive impact on about 95 communities, where projects took place, and enabled the partner organizations to better serve community needs. |
|||||||
In millions of $ | 7. Actual Spending 2005–06 | 8. Actual Spending 2006–07 | 9. Planned Spending 2007–08 | 10. Total Authorities 2007–08 | 11. Actual Spending 2007–08 | 12. Variance(s) Between 9 and 11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13. Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life | |||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total contributions | 16.7 | 17.5 | 19.8 | 19.8 | 18.0 | 1.8 | |
14. Total Program Activity | 107.9 | 149.7 | 145.3 | 143.2 | 133.6 | 11.7 | |
15. Total TPP | 1,015.7 | 1,150.3 | 1,098.2 | 1,157.5 | 1,117.9 | (19.7) | |
16. Comments on variance(s): Overall variance of $1.8 million is explained as follows:
|
|||||||
17. and 18. Significant audit and evaluation findings and URL(s) to last audit/evaluation: Summative evaluation of the Katimavik Program (May 19, 2006). http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm |
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Multiculturalism Program | |||||||
2. Start Date: 1982–1983 | 3. End Date: 2009–2010 | ||||||
4. Description: Derived from the Canadian Multiculturalism Act, the objectives of the Multiculturalism Program, supported by grants and contributions,are
In 2007–2008, the emphasis of the program was shifted to adddress
|
|||||||
5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians live in an inclusive society built on intercultural understanding and citizen participation. | |||||||
6. Results Achieved: New priorities were developed with the Secretary of State (Multiculturalism and Canadian Identity) for the grants and contributions program, and new funding application guidelines were subsequently published in March 2008. Since this was a transition year, results were only partially met. Examples of projects approved in 2007–2008 include:
|
|||||||
In millions of $ | 7. Actual Spending 2005–06 | 8. Actual Spending 2006–07 | 9. Planned Spending 2007–08 | 10. Total Authorities 2007–08 | 11. Actual Spending 2007–08 | 12. Variance(s) Between 9 and 11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13. Program Activity: Access and Participation in Canada's Cultural Life | |||||||
Total grants* | - | - | - | 2.3 | - | - | |
Total contributions | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
14. Total Program Activity | 118.4 | 115.1 | 127.7 | 130.6 | 123.5 | 4.2 | |
13. Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life | |||||||
Total grants | 0.8 | 0.6 | 7.7 | 5.2 | 0.3 | 7.4 | |
Total contributions | 9.7 | 8.6 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 6.8 | 2.7 | |
14. Total Program Activity | 107.9 | 149.7 | 145.3 | 143.2 | 133.6 | 11.7 | |
15. Total TPP | 1,015.7 | 1,150.3 | 1,098.2 | 1,157.5 | 1,117.9 | (19.7) | |
* The $2.3 million in grants listed under (10) Total Authorities 2007–08 and attributed to the Program Activity: Access and Participation in Canada's Cultural Life, should have been attributed to the Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life. The attribution is due to a departmental technical adjustment. | |||||||
16. Comments on variance(s): Overall variance of $10.1 million is explained as follows:
|
|||||||
17. and 18. Significant audit and evaluation findings and URL(s) to last audit/evaluation: Summative Evaluation of the Multiculturalism Program (June 28, 2006) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm |
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Museums Assistance Program | |||||||
2. Start Date: 1972–1973 | 3. End Date: 2009–2010 | ||||||
4. Description: The Museums Assistance Program (MAP) helps current and future generations of Canadians gain access to and develop a better appreciation of their heritage. The program provides financial support for activities related to the development and circulation of domestic travelling exhibitions around the country; the preservation, management, and presentation of Aboriginal cultural heritage; the enhancement of professional practices with respect to key museological functions; and the development of resources or services for multiple museums. | |||||||
5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians live in an inclusive society built on intercultural understanding and citizen participation. | |||||||
6. Results Achieved: In 2007–2008, MAP received 181 applications and funded 107 new projects. When multiyear projects are taken into consideration, 175 projects received funding for an estimated $6 million. Note: These numbers do not include actual expenditures for MAP in 2007–2008, as final project reports are still being submitted by recipients. Final figures will be provided by the third quarter of 2008–2009. Through the Young Canada Works in Heritage component, some 1 650 summer students and graduate interns found work in heritage organizations in 2007–2008, a hiring rate that exceeded the annual program target by 10 percent. Over 850 more summer jobs were created this year as a result of the additional $5 million funding from Budget 2007, more than doubling the number of jobs. |
|||||||
In millions of $ | 7. Actual Spending 2005–06 | 8. Actual Spending 2006–07 | 9. Planned Spending 2007–08 | 10. Total Authorities 2007–08 | 11. Actual Spending 2007–08 | 12. Variance(s) Between 9 and 11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13. Program Activity: Sustainability of Cultural Expression and Participation | |||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total contributions | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | 0.5 | - | |
14. Total Program Activity | 108.7 | 186.9 | 163.1 | 209.2 | 184.6 | (21.5) | |
13. Program Activity: Access and Participation in Canada's Cultural Life | |||||||
Total grants | 2.0 | 1.6 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 1.3 | |
Total contributions | 5.4 | 4.7 | 3.7 | 4.6 | 4.3 | (0.6) | |
14. Total Program Activity | 118.4 | 115.1 | 127.7 | 130.6 | 123.5 | 4.2 | |
13. Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life | |||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total contributions | 3.4 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 7.7 | 6.6 | (3,6) | |
14. Total Program Activity | 107.9 | 149.7 | 145.3 | 143.2 | 133.6 | 11.7 | |
15. Total TPP | 1,015.7 | 1,150.3 | 1,098.2 | 1,157.5 | 1,117.9 | (19.7) | |
16. Comments on variance(s): Overall variance of ($2.9 million) is explained as follows:
|
|||||||
17. and 18. Significant audit and evaluation findings and URL(s) to last audit/evaluation Summative Evaluation of the Museums Assistance Program and Canadian Museums Association Program (May 18, 2005) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Audit of the Museums Assistance Program (June 23, 2004) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm |
All these transfer payments programs are voted, which means that each year the Parliament of Canada votes annual Appropriation Act or Acts to grant expenditure authority to the Crown for the departments and agencies. This spending authorization lapses at year-end.
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Arts Presentation Canada | |||||||
2. Start Date: 2001–2002 | 3. End Date: 2009–2010 | ||||||
4. Description: Arts Presentation Canada (APC) supports arts presenters in the performing arts, arts festivals, and their service organizations to help them strengthen their presentation practices by encouraging diverse programming, organizing audience development, diversification and outreach activities, developing initiatives that bring professional artists into contact with residents of their community, and supporting networking and professional development for presenters. It also supports the emergence of presenters and presenter networks for under-served communities or artistic practices. Its objective is to give Canadians direct access to a diversity of artistic experiences. | |||||||
5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world. | |||||||
6. Results Achieved: In fiscal year 2007–2008, the program funded over 600 arts organizations, including festivals and series presentations. Through these activities and events, APC has increased access for Canadians to artistic experiences, to outreach programs, and to a greater diversity of arts. These are the percent of funded organizations that presented: dance (49%), literature (19%), music (72%), theatre (45%), media arts (18%), and visual arts (31%). The program has helped organizations expand and diversify their audiences. In the Arts Presentation Canada/Cultural Spaces Canada Client User Satisfaction Survey (conducted in 2007–2008), 90% of the organizations surveyed reported more diversified audiences. For example:
|
|||||||
In millions of $ | 7. Actual Spending 2005-06 | 8. Actual Spending 2006-07 | 9. Planned Spending 2007-08 | 10. Total Authorities 2007-08 | 11. Actual Spending 2007-08 | 12. Variance(s) Between 9 and 11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13. Program Activity: Access to and Participation in Canada’s Cultural Life | |||||||
Total grants | - | - | 7.0 | 7.0 | 3.1 | 3.9 | |
Total contributions | 20.7 | 22.1 | 13.6 | 13.3 | 20.2 | (6.6) | |
14. Total Program Activity | 118.4 | 115.1 | 127.7 | 130.6 | 123.5 | 4.2 | |
15. Total TPP | 1,015.7 | 1,150.3 | 1,098.2 | 1,157.5 | 1,117.9 | (19.7) | |
16. Comments on variance(s): Overall variance of ($2.7 million) is explained as follows:
|
|||||||
17. and 18. Significant audit and evaluation findings and URL(s) to last audit/evaluation Audit of the Arts Presentation Canada Program (October 20, 2004) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Joint Formative Evaluation of Arts Presentation Canada, Cultural Spaces Canada, and the Canadian Arts and Heritage Sustainability Program (October 22, 2003) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Evaluation of the Cultural Initiatives Program (September 19, 2001) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm |
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Book Publishing Industry Development Program | |||||||||||
2. Start Date: 1980–1981 | 3. End Date: 2010–2011 | ||||||||||
4. Description: The Book Publishing Industry Development Program (BPIDP) supports the Canadian book industry to ensure access to a diverse range of Canadian-authored books in Canada and abroad. The BPIDP aims to meet this objective by fostering a strong and viable Canadian book industry that publishes and promotes Canadian-authored books. | |||||||||||
5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world. | |||||||||||
6. Results Achieved: In 2007–2008, the BPIDP supported 230 Canadian-owned publishers in more than 75 Canadian towns and cities. It also supported a broad range of collective projects in all regions aimed at bringing Canadian-authored books and readers together. It also supported building skills and knowledge in the Canadian book industry. BPIDP-supported publishers produced 5 672 new Canadian-authored titles and books by nearly 1 000 first-time authors. Support for publishers, coupled with broad support for domestic and international marketing activities, ensured the continued broad dissemination of these Canadian stories. Publishers funded by BPIDP in 2007–2008 realized $350 million in book sales in Canada and $98 million in export sales for a total of $448 million. This high level of sales, and the 13% growth in recipients’ sales over the last three years, indicates that Canadian and international readers continue to seek and consume Canadian books in strong and growing numbers. BPIDP continued to invest in building industry knowledge, skills, and capacity to ensure that these successes continue. Among the important 2007–2008 results: BPIDP funding helped 181 Canadian-owned publishers to achieve bibliographic data quality certification, expanding the industry’s capacity to benefit from technological efficiencies in the book industry supply chain. |
|||||||||||
In millions of $ | 7. Actual Spending 2005–06 | 8. Actual Spending 2006–07 | 9. Planned Spending 2007–08 | 10. Total Authorities 2007–08 | 11. Actual Spending 2007–08 | 12. Variance(s) Between 9 and 11 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13. Program Activity: Creation of Canadian Content and Performance Excellence | |||||||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||
Total contributions | 26.7 | 26.2 | 27.5 | 27.5 | 27.1 | 0.4 | |||||
14. Total Program Activity | 300.8 | 320.8 | 301.3 | 299.6 | 304.1 | (2.8) | |||||
13. Program Activity: Sustainability of Cultural Expression and Participation | |||||||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||
Total contributions | 5.8 | 7.7 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 2.9 | 1.1 | |||||
14. Total Program Activity | 108.7 | 186.9 | 163.1 | 209.2 | 184.6 | (21.5) | |||||
13. Program Activity: Access to and Participation in Canada’s Cultural Life | |||||||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||
Total contributions | 6.1 | 3.0 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.9 | (0.2) | |||||
14. Total Program Activity | 118.4 | 115.1 | 127.7 | 130.6 | 123.5 | 4.2 | |||||
15. Total TPP | ,015.7 | 1,150.3 | 1,098.2 | 1,157.5 | 1,117.9 | (19.7) | |||||
16. Comments on variance(s): Overall variance of $1.3 million is explained as follows:
|
|||||||||||
17. and 18. Significant audit and evaluation findings and URL(s) to last audit/evaluation:
Summative Evaluation of the Book Publishing Industry Development Program (2004) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Audit of the Book Publishing Industry Development Program (2003) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm |
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada New Media Fund | |||||||
2. Start Date: 2000–2001 | 3. End Date: 2008–2009 | ||||||
4. Description: The Canada New Media Fund (CNMF), administered by Telefilm Canada, supports the development, production, marketing and distribution of high-quality, original, interactive, Canadian new media cultural products, in both official languages, that are intended for the general public. | |||||||
5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world. | |||||||
6. Results Achieved: Canadian Heritage transferred $11.5 million to Telefilm Canada for the CNMF, of which $9.4 million supported 153 projects.
The CNMF supported a broad range of products, which attract different types and sizes of audiences. Results are available for those products and websites that were completed in 2007–2008. Through various digital platforms, Canadians have access to more innovative interactive products developed by Canadian companies. Some of these products have attracted broad audiences, particularly those associated with television programming.
Examples include:
A majority of the projects reported more modest traffic statistics, which can be expected from websites that often target niche audiences, such as Contact, l’encyclopédie de la création, produced by Contact TV Inc. This website, an
evolving encyclopaedia, exceeds the content of its companion television program, which presents interviews with notable creators. This website received 63 000 visits between July 2007 and March 2008. The CNMF Sectoral Assistance component supports activities designed to increase the competitiveness of the Canadian interactive media sector. These activities gave interactive media companies access to workshops, internships, conferences, and other networking events. For example, the Montréal International Game Summit, an annual event serving Canadian and international members of the video and electronic game industries, fosters learning, networking, and building partnerships. |
|||||||
In millions of $ | 7. Actual Spending 2005–06 | 8. Actual Spending 2006–07 | 9. Planned Spending 2007–08 | 10. Total Authorities 2007–08 | 11. Actual Spending 2007–08 | 12. Variance(s) Between 9 and 11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13. Program Activity: Creation of Canadian Content and Performance Excellence | |||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total contributions | 14.0 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 11.5 | 2.5 | |
14. Total Program Activity | 300.8 | 320.8 | 301.3 | 299.6 | 304.1 | (2.8) | |
15. Total TPP | 1,015.7 | 1,150.3 | 1,098.2 | 1,157.5 | 1,117.9 | (19.7) | |
16. Comments on variance(s): Overall variance of $2.5 million is mainly explained as follows:
|
|||||||
17. and 18. Significant audit and evaluation findings and URL(s) to last audit/evaluation:
Audit of the Canada New Media Fund (June 23, 2004) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm |
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canadian Arts and Heritage Sustainability Program | |||||||
2. Start Date: 2001–2002 | 3. End Date: 2009–2010 | ||||||
4. Description: The Canadian Arts and Heritage Sustainability Program (CAHSP) is designed to strengthen organizational effectiveness, build operational and financial capacity within the arts and heritage sectors, and ensure that those organizations operate in communities that value their existence, see them as a key asset, and support them. There are six components: Stabilization Projects, Capacity Building, Endowment Incentives, Limited Support to Endangered Arts Organizations, Networking, and Cultural Capitals of Canada. | |||||||
5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world. | |||||||
6. Results Achieved: Endowment Incentives During the past three years, the number of requests to the Endowment Incentives component has increased steadily. In 2007–2008, 97 requests totalling $14.8 million were approved. Private sector donations increased by $5 million, from $23 million
to $28 million, between 2006–2007 and 2007–2008. This steady increase in community support means that the matching incentive of the Department has gone from $0.64 for each dollar raised in 2006–2007 to $0.53 in 2007–2008. Since the launch of the
component, the federal government’s contribution of $73.4 million has leveraged $102.6 million in donations from the private sector for a total of $176 million invested in arts organizations’ endowment funds. In provinces with similar programs, there
is a marked increase in the number of applications received by the Department. Program clients report the key role this program plays in assisting them to attract private sector resources and build an important supplementary revenue stream. Capacity Building In 2007–2008, the CAHSP Capacity Building component provided support totalling $4.4 million to 165 projects of which 106 were with arts organizations and 59 with heritage organizations. These projects included business, strategic, and human
resources plans, new financing and ticketing systems, employee training, and marketing strategies. Clients continue to report the positive impacts of these projects on organizational strength. Cultural Capitals of Canada (CCC) In 2007–2008, $5.9 million in contributions were approved under CCC. Since 2002–2003, there have been 129 eligible applications to CCC. Of these, 34 Cultural Capitals of Canada designations have been awarded, for a total of $21 million. A survey of CCC applicants and recipients, completed in 2007–2008, assessed its impact. It confirmed that recipients were pleased with the positive outcome of their designation. Many municipalities felt that the mere act of applying for the CCC
designation led communities to think more extensively about arts and culture. This prompted a number of communities to proceed with activities even without the designation. For recipient communities, the designation contributed significantly to implementing cultural activities that tended to be larger in scope than originally planned. Other results of the CCC survey show:
Caraquet, New Brunswick, is the first community to have been designated a Cultural Capital of Canada twice: first in 2003 then again in 2009. New applications by previous winning municipalities indicate that results already achieved through CCC are encouraging further municipal support, involvement, and interest in arts and heritage activities. Networking Initiatives Component Funding of $310,000 was approved through the Networking Initiatives component (Creative City Network and Les Arts et la Ville) in 2007–2008. Both networks support their members in furthering municipal involvement and investment in cultural development. Les Arts et la Ville engages Francophone communities and organizations outside Québec through new membership from Manitoba, Yukon, and British Columbia. The Creative City Network (CCN) furthered local cultural development by hosting its sixth annual conference, which offered professional development sessions, study tours, and networking opportunities. CCN is expanding its outreach to rural and remote communities by organizing regional caucus meetings that include a professional development component tailored to the communities. |
|||||||
In millions of $ | 7. Actual Spending 2005–06 | 8. Actual Spending 2006–07 | 9. Planned Spending 2007–08 | 10. Total Authorities 2007–08 | 11. Actual Spending 2007–08 | 12. Variance(s) Between 9 and 11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13. Program Activity: Sustainability of Cultural Expression and Participation | |||||||
Total grants | 15.4 | 15.4 | 16.9 | 16.9 | 16.3 | 0.6 | |
Total contributions | 5.1 | 4.9 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 3.8 | 1.5 | |
14. Total Program Activity | 108.7 | 186.9 | 163.1 | 209.2 | 184.6 | (21.5) | |
13. Program Activity: Access to and Participation in Canada’s Cultural Life |
|||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total contributions | 1.6 | 3.2 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 5.7 | (0.8) | |
14. Total Program Activity | 118.4 | 115.1 | 127.7 | 130.6 | 123.5 | 4.2 | |
13. Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life | |||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total contributions | - | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | - | 0.2 | |
14. Total Program Activity | 107.9 | 149.7 | 145.3 | 143.2 | 133.6 | 11.7 | |
15. Total TPP | 1,015.7 | 1,150.3 | 1,098.2 | 1,157.5 | 1,117.9 | (19.7) | |
16. Comments on variance(s): Overall variance of $1.3 million is explained as follows:
|
|||||||
17. and 18. Significant audit and evaluation findings and URL(s) to last audit/evaluation: Formative Evaluation of Two Canadian Arts and Heritage Sustainability Program Components: Cultural Capitals of Canada and Networking Initiatives (June 22, 2005) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Audit of the Canadian Heritage Arts and Sustainability Program (February 24, 2005) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm |
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canadian Culture Online Program | |||||||
2. Start Date: 2001–2002 | 3. End Date: 2009–2010 | ||||||
4. Description: Canadian Culture Online Program (CCOP) includes three sub-components: Access and Content, Research and Development, and New Media Sector Development. The objectives of the program are to provide Canadians access to and participation in interactive digital resources that reflect our diverse heritage, cultures, languages, and history, and to ensure that the program contributes to a supportive environment for the new media sector in Canada. |
|||||||
5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world. | |||||||
6. Results Achieved: In 2007–2008, the CCOP provided $16.1 million in funding for 66 projects, including:
The CCOP supported a broad range of projects, in both official languages, all of which attract different audiences. The following results are for websites and research projects that were completed in 2007–2008. A broad range of projects reached audiences of varying sizes. The Canadian Tamil Youth Development Centre’s CanTYD website, a community-developed project, received 11 000 visits over six months. As an example of a larger project, the CBC/Radio-Canada Archives, received 3.9 million visits in a year. The Virtual Museum of Canada continued to be a popular destination, generating nearly 13.3 million visits in 2007–2008. Support for interactive media research and development projects helped create a stimulating environment conducive to creating and distributing yet more dynamic cultural content. Thematic research networks and partnerships have brought together 60 Canadian research institutions and interactive media organizations to collaborate on developing 35 innovative tools. Note: Resources allocated for New Media Sector Development were transferred to Telefilm Canada in 2007–2008. For results, see Sectoral Assistance component in Table 6: Details of Transfer Payment Programs: Canada New Media Fund |
|||||||
In millions of $ | 7. Actual Spending 2005–06 | 8. Actual Spending 2006–07 | 9. Planned Spending 2007–08 | 10. Total Authorities 2007–08 | 11. Actual Spending 2007–08 | 12. Variance(s) Between 9 and 11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13. Program Activity: Sustainability of Cultural Expression and Participation | |||||||
Total grants | - | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 | - | 0.8 | |
Total contributions | 4.3 | 5.0 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 3.6 | (1.4) | |
14. Total Program Activity | 108.7 | 186.9 | 163.1 | 209.2 | 184.6 | (21.5) | |
13. Program Activity: Access to and Participation in Canada’s Cultural Life |
|||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total contributions | 8.3 | 9.5 | 8.3 | 7.4 | 7.5 | 0.8 | |
14. Total Program Activity | 118.4 | 115.1 | 127.7 | 130.6 | 123.5 | 4.2 | |
15. Total TPP | 1,015.7 | 1,150.3 | 1,098.2 | 1,157.5 | 1,117.9 | (19.7) | |
16. Comments on variance(s): Overall variance of $0.2 million is mainly explained as follows:
|
|||||||
17. and 18. Significant audit and evaluation findings and URL(s) to last audit/evaluation: Formative Evaluation of Canadian Culture Online (October 20, 2004) Audit of Canadian Culture Online Program (June 23, 2004) |
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Magazine Fund | |||||||
2. Start Date: 1999–2000 | 3. End Date: 2010–2011 | ||||||
4. Description: The Canada Magazine Fund (CMF) supports Canadian magazine publishers and not-for-profit organizations representing periodical publishers to: maintain Canadian editorial content in Canadian
magazines, increase Canadians’ access to Canadian magazines, enhance the quality and diversity of Canadian magazines, and strengthen the infrastructure of the Canadian magazine industry. The fund achieves these goals by
|
|||||||
5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world. | |||||||
6. Results Achieved: In 2007–2008, the CMF contributed $10.7 million towards the costs of producing Canadian editorial content in Canadian magazines. Canadian content made up over 127 000 pages, or over 92 percent of the total editorial content in these magazines. These figures are similar to last year’s figures. The CMF also helped strengthen the industry’s infrastructure through 31 collective projects that dealt with professional development, promotion and marketing, newsstand sales building, research, and new technology. Canadian readers had access to a wide range of Canadian magazines in 2007–2008 as 63 Canadian magazines were launched, while only 19 magazines folded. There were 15 percent fewer launches than the year before. Of the new titles, 49 were consumer magazines in 11 different subject categories. (Source: Masthead, March–April 2008) |
|||||||
In millions of $ | 7. Actual Spending 2005–06 | 8. Actual Spending 2006–07 | 9. Planned Spending 2007–08 | 10. Total Authorities 2007–08 | 11. Actual Spending 2007–08 | 12. Variance(s) Between 9 and 11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13. Program Activity: Creation of Canadian Content and Performance Excellence | |||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total contributions | 11.0 | 11.0 | 10.9 | 10.9 | 10.7 | 0.2 | |
14. Total Program Activity | 300.8 | 320.8 | 301.3 | 299.6 | 304.1 | (2.8) | |
13. Program Activity: Sustainability of Cultural Expression and Participation | |||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total contributions | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 0.8 | |
14. Total Program Activity | 108.7 | 186.9 | 163.1 | 209.2 | 184.6 | (21.5) | |
15. Total TPP | 1,015.7 | 1,150.3 | 1,098.2 | 1,157.5 | 1,117.9 | (19.7) | |
16. Comments on variance(s): Overall variance of $1 million is explained as follows:
|
|||||||
17. and 18. Significant audit and evaluation findings and URL(s) to last audit/evaluation: Summative Evaluation of the Canada Magazine Fund (June 2006) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Post- Implementation Audit of the Canada Magazine Fund (February 26, 2003) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm |
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Music Fund | |||||||
2. Start Date: 2001–2002 | 3. End Date: 2009–2010 | ||||||
4. Description: The Canada Music Fund (CMF) offers a comprehensive range of both innovative and proven funding components designed to support diversity, capacity, and excellence in the Canadian sound recording industry at every level, and for all participants from creators to audience. Activities supported include song writing development, CD and video/DVD production, marketing, touring, distribution, public awareness, industry training, awards shows, archiving, preservation, providing access, and industry infrastructure development. Through these activities, the CMF contributes to developing Canada’s stars of tomorrow; ensures access to diverse Canadian music choices, both in Canada and abroad; and positions Canadian music for success in the digital age. | |||||||
5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world. | |||||||
6. Results Achieved: The Canadian sound recording industry has experienced sharp sales declines this decade, due in large part to the Internet and the rapidly changing retail landscape. Despite this decline, Canadians continue to purchase and access more Canadian music. Since the inception of the CMF, the market share of Canadian artist albums sold in Canada increased from 16% in 2001 to 25.95% in 2007. The number of Canadian songwriters has also increased during that time, with 22 093 Canadian songwriters receiving performance royalties from SOCAN in 2006, up from 17 645 in 2001. In 2007–2008, CMF support continued to ensure the production of varied Canadian music and the development of Canadian talent at home and abroad. The New Musical Works and Canadian Musical Diversity components provided funding for the production of over 350 albums by Canadian artists. To ensure the broad dissemination of these and other Canadian works, over 700 projects received marketing, touring, or showcasing support. The Music Entrepreneur Component (MEC) supported 22 established Canadian sound recording firms in 2007–2008. The funding helps ensure the existence of a diverse range of compelling Canadian musical choices as these companies become increasingly competitive nationally and internationally and position themselves for success in a global economy. The 2007–2008 MEC recipients released 207 albums by Canadian artists in the past year, up from 188 in 2005–2006. Sales of physical albums by Canadian artists outside of Canada rose by 8.5%. They continued to make head way into the online market with sales of downloaded music representing 10.2% of their total sales, up from 1.9% two years ago. |
|||||||
In millions of $ | 7. Actual Spending 2005–06 | 8. Actual Spending 2006–07 | 9. Planned Spending 2007–08 | 10. Total Authorities 2007–08 | 11. Actual Spending 2007–08 | 12. Variance(s) Between 9 and 11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13. Program Activity: Creation of Canadian Content and Performance Excellence | |||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total contributions | 15.2 | 11.5 | 9.4 | 9.2 | 10.8 | (1.4) | |
14. Total Program Activity | 300.8 | 320.8 | 301.3 | 299.6 | 304.1 | (2.8) | |
13. Program Activity: Sustainability of Cultural Expression and Participation | |||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total contributions | 4.5 | 9.4 | 11.5 | 11.5 | 10.3 | 1.2 | |
14. Total Program Activity | 108.7 | 186.9 | 163.1 | 209.2 | 184.6 | (21.5) | |
13. Program Activity: Preservation of Canada’s Heritage | |||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total contributions | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | - | |
14. Total Program Activity | 20.4 | 20.5 | 21.9 | 17.1 | 19.8 | 2.1 | |
13. Program Activity: Access and Participation in Canada’s Cultural Life | |||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total contributions | 2.7 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 2.4 | (0.6) | |
14. Total Program Activity | 118.4 | 115.1 | 127.7 | 130.6 | 123.5 | 4.2 | |
15. Total TPP | 1,015.7 | 1,150.3 | 1,098.2 | 1,157.5 | 1,117.9 | (19.7) | |
16. Comments on variance(s): Overall variance of ($0.6 million) is explained as follows:
|
|||||||
17. and 18. Significant audit and evaluation findings and URL(s) to last audit/evaluation: Summative Evaluation of Canada Music Fund (October 2007) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/evaltn/2007/2007-04/index-eng.cfm Audit of the Canada Music Fund (June 23, 2004) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Evaluation of the Canada Music Council (May 18, 2005) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Formative Evaluation of the Canada Music Fund (February 25, 2004) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm |
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program:Contribution in Support of the Canadian Television Fund | |||||||
2. Start Date: 1996–1997 | 3. End Date: 2008–2009 | ||||||
4. Description: The Canadian Television Fund (CTF) supports the creation and broadcast of high-quality prime-time Canadian programs in both official languages and in Aboriginal languages, and builds audiences for these programs. The CTF supports dramas, youth and children’s programs, documentaries, variety shows, and performing arts. It also supports Aboriginal and Francophone productions in minority situations. | |||||||
5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world. | |||||||
6. Results Achieved: In 2007–2008, the CTF invested over $252 million in Canadian productions, which generated over 2 000 new hours of Canadian television programming.* Since its inception in 1996, the CTF has invested more than $2.5 billion, which generated the production of 25 000 hours of Canadian programs. *Data is not final until the release of the CTF annual report. |
|||||||
In millions of $ | 7. Actual Spending 2005–06 | 8. Actual Spending 2006–07 | 9. Planned Spending 2007–08 | 10. Total Authorities 2007–08 | 11. Actual Spending 2007–08 | 12. Variance(s) Between 9 and 11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13. Program Activity: Creation of Canadian Content and Performance Excellence | |||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total contributions | 99.6 | 120.0 | 120.0 | 120.0 | 120.0 | - | |
14. Total Program Activity | 300.8 | 320.8 | 301.3 | 299.6 | 304.1 | (2.8) | |
15. Total TPP | 1,015.7 | 1,150.3 | 1,098.2 | 1,157.5 | 1,117.9 | (19.7) | |
16. Comments on variance(s): n/a |
|||||||
17. and 18. Significant audit and evaluation findings and URL(s) to last audit/evaluation: Summative Evaluation of the Canadian Television Fund Program (October 19, 2005) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Audit of the Canadian Television Fund (June 23, 2004) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm |
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Cultural Spaces Canada | |||||||
2. Start Date: 2001–2002 | 3. End Date: 2009–2010 | ||||||
4. Description: The Cultural Spaces Canada (CSC) program supports the construction, renovation, and improvement of not-for-profit facilities dedicated to arts and heritage. As a complement to the programs offered by Infrastructure Canada, it helps improve the physical conditions that foster creativity and artistic activity within community life. | |||||||
5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world. | |||||||
6. Results Achieved: Since its inception in 2001–2002, the CSC program has supported over 630 projects, in more than 230 communities across Canada. In 2007–2008, the CSC program contributed to 98 infrastructure improvement projects. These included funding to
For every dollar invested by the program since its inception in 2001–2002, close to six additional dollars are raised from diverse sources, public or private. These projects improve infrastructure, which facilitates greater creativity, access, and artistic innovation. For instance, a $2.4 million-contribution from CSC was approved in 2007–2008 for significant renovations and equipment purchases for
Théâtre Denise-Pelletier, a leading presenter of theatre for young people in Quebec. This project resulted in the Théâtre being able to meet mechanical, technical, and electrical standards. It will have a significant impact on the organization,
allowing it to expand its activities and improve conditions for artists. The upgrades will also provide a safe environment for nearly 100 000 youth who attend its performances each year. Similarly, in 2007–2008, CSC approved a total of $186,794 for the Citadel Theatre in Edmonton for the third phase of its modernization of the theatre's technical capacity. Lighting, sound, and other specialized equipment was purchased, enabling the theatre to present larger, more sophisticated productions, co-productions, and touring companies. CSC also contributed a total of $235,750 to earlier phases of the Citadel’s upgrading. |
|||||||
In millions of $ | 7. Actual Spending 2005–06 | 8. Actual Spending 2006–07 | 9. Planned Spending 2007–08 | 10. Total Authorities 2007–08 | 11. Actual Spending 2007–08 | 12. Variance(s) Between 9 and 11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13. Program Activity: Access to and Participation in Canada’s Cultural Life | |||||||
Total grants | - | 0.3 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.4 | 2.6 | |
Total contributions | 12.5 | 19.8 | 26.6 | 27.4 | 22.9 | 3.7 | |
14. Total Program Activity | 118.4 | 115.1 | 127.7 | 130.6 | 123.5 | 4.2 | |
15. Total TPP | 1,015.7 | 1,150.3 | 1,098.2 | 1,157.5 | 1,117.9 | (19.7) | |
16. Comments on variance(s): Overall variance of $6.3 million is explained as follows:
|
|||||||
17. and 18. Significant audit and evaluation findings and URL(s) to last audit/evaluation: Audit of the Cultural Spaces Canada Program (October 20, 2004) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Joint Formative Evaluation of Arts Presentation Canada, Cultural Spaces Canada and the Canadian Arts and Heritage Sustainability Program (October 22, 2003) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm |
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: National Arts Training Contribution Program | |||||||
2. Start Date: 1997–1998 | 3. End Date: 2012–2013 | ||||||
4. Description: The National Arts Training Contribution Program (NATCP) is designed to assist independent Canadian not-for-profit organizations that specialize in training Canadians who seek a professional career in the arts. | |||||||
5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world. | |||||||
6. Results Achieved: Since the inception of the program in 1997–1998, through 2007–2008, the NATCP has disbursed almost $146 million in operating funding to national training schools in various artistic disciplines. In 2001, the NATCP budget was increased from $6 million to $16.7 million enabling the program to support institutions that train in non-European based arts forms and Aboriginal based art forms. Prior to the new investment, the program funded 18 institutions, which included only one Aboriginal institution and no institutions that trained in non-European based art forms. Today, the NATCP supports nine culturally diverse institutions and eight Aboriginal institutions, which train artists for professional careers in Canada and internationally in a wide variety of art forms that range from Korean dance to Aboriginal theatre. The 37 institutions currently supported by the program reflect and express Canada’s diverse society. A summative evaluation of the program was completed in March 2007 and posted on the departmental website in early 2008. It found that there is a need for continued federal support in national arts training and that the program is meeting its overall objective to provide arts training of the highest calibre. It also found that the NATCP has an “invaluable” and “significant” impact on Canadians’ access to high-quality artistic and cultural products. Institutions receiving NATCP funding support 3 500 artists each year who complete their training program. Of these, 80% are working professionally, of whom 20% work internationally. Nearly 50% of graduates of NATCP-funded institutions received an award in their first three years after graduation, and are more likely to receive honours, distinctions, and awards than graduates of unfunded institutions. |
|||||||
In millions of $ | 7. Actual Spending 2005–06 | 8. Actual Spending 2006–07 | 9. Planned Spending 2007–08 | 10. Total Authorities 2007–08 | 11. Actual Spending 2007–08 | 12. Variance(s) Between 9 and 11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13. Program Activity: Sustainability of Cultural Expression and Participation | |||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total contributions | 17.4 | 17.0 | 15.9 | 15.9 | 19.4 | (3.5) | |
14. Total Program Activity | 108.7 | 186.9 | 163.1 | 209.2 | 184.6 | (21.5) | |
15. Total TPP | 1,015.7 | 1,150.3 | 1,098.2 | 1,157.5 | 1,117.9 | (19.7) | |
16. Comments on variance(s): Overall variance of $3.5 million is explained as follows:
|
|||||||
17. and 18. Significant audit and evaluation findings and URL(s) to last audit/evaluation Summative Evaluation of the National Arts Training Contributions Program (May 2007) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/evaltn/2007/2007-03/index-eng.cfm |
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Publication Assistance Program | |||||||
2. Start Date: 1996–1997 | 3. End Date: 2009–2010 | ||||||
4. Description: The Publication Assistance Program (PAP) is delivered in partnership with the Canada Post Corporation and decreases the costs to eligible Canadian periodicals of mailing copies to Canadian readers. Assistance is provided to more than 800 publishers of almost 1 200 different Canadian periodicals, supporting the delivery of 210 million eligible copies of periodicals. These include: general or special interest paid circulation magazines, non-daily community newspapers, unpaid request circulation periodicals, and religious, scholarly, Aboriginal, ethno-cultural, farm, and official language minority periodicals. | |||||||
5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world. | |||||||
6. Results Achieved: In 2007–2008, the program provided Canadian magazines and non-daily newspapers with postal subsidies of over $58 million, representing an average of about 64.8% of their total mailing costs. The program funded 1 153 different publications and supported the distribution of over 187 million copies of Canadian periodicals through the mail. Canadian readers had access to a wide range of Canadian magazines in 2007–2008 as 63 new Canadian magazines were launched, while only 19 magazines folded. There were 15% fewer launches than the year before. Of the new titles, 49 were consumer magazines in 11 different subject categories. (Source: Masthead, March–April 2008). |
|||||||
In millions of $ | 7. Actual Spending 2005–06 | 8. Actual Spending 2006–07 | 9. Planned Spending 2007–08 | 10. Total Authorities 2007–08 | 11. Actual Spending 2007–08 | 12. Variance(s) Between 9 and 11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13. Program Activity: Access to and Participation in Canada’s Cultural Life | |||||||
Total grants | 45.4 | 45.4 | 45.4 | 45.4 | 45.4 | - | |
Total contributions | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
14. Total Program Activity | 118.4 | 115.1 | 127.7 | 130.6 | 123.5 | 4.2 | |
15. Total TPP | 1,015.7 | 1,150.3 | 1,098.2 | 1,157.5 | 1,117.9 | (19.7) | |
16. Comments on variance(s): n/a |
|||||||
17. and 18. Significant audit and evaluation findings and URL(s) to last audit/evaluation: Summative Evaluation of the Publications Assistance Program (June 22, 2005) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm |
All these transfer payments programs are voted, which means that each year the Parliament of Canada votes annual Appropriation Act or Acts to grant expenditure authority to the Crown for the departments and agencies. This spending authorization lapses at year-end.
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Athlete Assistance Program | |||||||
2. Start Date: 1971 | 3. End Date: 2011 | ||||||
4. Description: The Athlete Assistance Program (AAP) contributes to the pursuit of excellence through its support for improved Canadian athlete performances at major international sporting events,
enabling athletes to combine their sport and academic or working careers while training intensively in pursuit of world-class performances. To this end, the program identifies and supports athletes already among or having the potential to be among
the top sixteen athletes in the world in their sport. Athletes who are approved for funding and are financially supported through the AAP are referred to as "carded" athletes. AAP support is referred to as "carding." The objectives of the program are to
|
|||||||
5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world. | |||||||
6. Results Achieved: Although some data may be incomplete, Sport Canada was able to accomplish the following results:
(The 2007 edition of the Indexwas produced in January 2008. For summer sports, Canada ranked 19th in the world by finishing with 129 medal points based on 53 medals won (with 5 points awarded for a gold medal, 3 points for a silver medal and 1 point for a bronze medal) from 2004–2007. This compares with 153 medal points earned based on 63 medals won from 2003–2006—also a 19th place ranking.) |
|||||||
In millions of $ | 7. Actual Spending 2005–06 |
8. Actual Spending 2006–07 |
9. Planned Spending 2007–08 |
10. Total Authorities 2007–08 |
11. Actual Spending 2007–08 |
12. Variance(s) Between 9 and 11 |
|
13. Program Activity: Creation of Canadian Content and Performance Excellence |
|||||||
Total grants | 24.8 | 25.3 | 27.0 | 27.0 | 25.3 | 1.7 | |
Total contributions | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
14. Total Program Activity | 300.8 | 320.8 | 301.3 | 299.6 | 304.1 | (2.8) | |
15. Total TPP | 1,015.7 | 1,150.3 | 1,098.2 | 1,157.5 | 1,117.9 | (19.7) | |
16. Comments on variance(s): Overall variance of $1.7 million is explained as follows:
|
|||||||
17. and 18. Significant audit and evaluation findings and URL(s) to last audit/evaluation: Summative Evaluation of the Athlete Assistance Program- Final Report (June 25, 2003) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Compliance Audit of the Athlete Assistance Program (AAP)- Administered by Sport Canada, Department of Canadian Heritage (November 28, 2001) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm |
|||||||
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Hosting Program | |||||||
2. Start Date: 1967 | 3. End Date: 2011 | ||||||
4. Description: The Hosting Program is a key instrument in the Government of Canada's overall approach to sport development in Canada and aims to enhance the development of sport excellence and the international profile of sport organizations by assisting sport organizations to host the Canada Games and international sport events in Canada. These events are expected to produce significant sport, economic, social, and cultural benefits. The program has four components: International Major Multisport Games, International Single Sport Events, International Multisport Games for Aboriginal Peoples and Persons with a Disability, and the Canada Games. The Hosting Program offers Canada a planned and coordinated approach to realizing direct and significant benefits from bidding and hosting projects—benefits in sport development and positive economic, social, cultural and community impacts across a broad range of government priorities. The program is characterized by active liaison with collaborators/stakeholders and by a diligent contribution system. Through contributions to bidding and hosting, the objectives of the Hosting Program are to
The Treasury Board decision linked to the new policy include a revised description of the program including each change identified:
|
|||||||
5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world. | |||||||
6. Results Achieved: Sport Canada worked to increase sport excellence and development impacts from planned events. While the data is incomplete, based on the first 11 reports received (of 54), the Hosting Program has provided opportunities for 847 Canadian athletes to participate in international sport events. Sport Canada worked to increase opportunities for designated under-represented groups to participate in planned events. While the data is incomplete, based on the first 11 reports (of 54), the Hosting Program has provided opportunities for 397 Canadian athletes with disabilities to participate in international sport events. Sport Canada worked to increase economic, social, and cultural and community impacts of planned events that support Government of Canada priorities. While data for events under $250,000 are not normally captured by Sport Canada, the economic impact assessment for the FIFA U-20 World Cup was conducted by the Canadian Sport Tourism Alliance. The event contributed approximately $114 million to the GDP and generated an estimated $259.02 million in economic activity throughout the four host provinces. The combined total of the visitor expenditures, operational expenditures, and capital construction costs (of the National Soccer Stadium in Toronto) of the event totaled just over $108 million. These expenditures supported over $74 million in wages and salaries and approximately 1 700 jobs. |
|||||||
In millions of $ | 7. Actual Spending 2005–06 |
8. Actual Spending 2006–07 |
9. Planned Spending 2007–08 |
10. Total Authorities 2007–08 |
11. Actual Spending 2007–08 |
12. Variance(s) Between 9 and 11 |
|
13. Program Activity: Creation of Canadian Content and Performance Excellence | |||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total contributions | 17.7 | 20.3 | 10.7 | 9.2 | 8.9 | 1.8 | |
14. Total Program Activity | 300.8 | 320.8 | 301.3 | 299.6 | 304.1 | (2.8) | |
13. Program Activity: Sustainability of Cultural Expression and Participation | |||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total contributions | 33.9 | 106.2 | 87.0 | 127.7 | 108.7 | (21.7) | |
14. Total Program Activity | 108.7 | 186.9 | 163.1 | 209.2 | 184.6 | (21.5) | |
13. Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life | |||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total contributions | - | - | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 0.7 | |
14. Total Program Activity | 107.9 | 149.7 | 145.3 | 143.2 | 133.6 | 11.7 | |
15. Total TPP | 1,015.7 | 1,150.3 | 1,098.2 | 1,157.5 | 1,117.9 | (19.7) | |
16. Comments on variance(s): Overall variance of ($19.2 million) is mainly explained as follows:
|
|||||||
17. and 18. Significant audit and evaluation findings and URL(s) to last audit/evaluation: Audit of the Contribution Agreements with the XI FINA World Championships—Montreal 2005 Organizing Committee (March 15, 2006) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Report on the Audit of the Hosting Program (Sport Canada) Assurance Services Directorate (June 15, 2005) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Summative Evaluation of the Department of Canadian Heritage's Sport Hosting Program (February 5, 2004) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm |
|||||||
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Sport Support Program | |||||||
2. Start Date: 1961 | 3. End Date: 2011 | ||||||
4. Description: The Sport Support Program (SSP) is the primary funding vehicle for initiatives associated with the delivery of the Canadian Sport Policy. The SSP funding is aimed at developing
athletes and coaches at the highest international levels; providing sound technically-based sport programming for all athletes; increasing the number of Canadians from all segments of society involved in sport; and advancing Canadian interests and
values in Canada and abroad. This funding is provided to eligible organizations in support of programming that supports the goals of the Canadian Sport Policy. Specific objectives of the program are to
|
|||||||
5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world. | |||||||
6. Results Achieved: Sport Canada continued to provide sport programs and services to the Canadian sport system by supporting National Sport Organizations (NSOs) and Multisport Service Organizations (MSOs). In 2007–2008, Sport Canada supported 56 NSOs, 15 MSOs, 7 Canadian Sport Centres and 7 additional non-government organizations. Sport Canada worked to increase opportunities for sport participation among all Canadians, including targeted under-represented groups, by funding Sport Participation Development Initiatives—for persons with and without a disability—for 40 NSOs and 3 MSOs, and. Sport Participation Projects for 5 MSOs and 7 other Non-Government Organizations. About 990 000 participants benefited from these initiatives, an increase over the 490 000 in 2006–2007. In addition, Sport Canada supported 13 FPT Bilateral Agreements to increase sport participation levels as expressed in the Canadian Sport Policy and 10 to encourage and support greater participation of Aboriginal peoples in sport. In 2007–2008, from preliminary reports from P/Ts, an estimated 1.3 million participants (from targeted and non- targeted groups) benefited from these agreements. Revised national accountability standards for 2006–2012 were introduced in 2006–2007. NSOs receiving Sport Canada funding will be monitored annually for compliance with these standards. First priority standards (which were expected to have been fully met by March 31, 2008) address the following: multi-year planning, official languages services, bilingual websites, harassment and abuse, bilingual communication with national teams, national teams—harassment and abuse awareness, and national teams—athlete/coach leadership. In 2006–2007, the first year of monitoring, 93% of NSOs had at least partially met all seven first priority standards, while 51% of NSOs had fully met at least five. In 2007–2008, 99% of NSOs had at least partially met all seven "first priority" standards and 88% had fully met at least five. Information is available on only 45 of 56 NSOs. Sport Canada has worked to increase the number of NSOs with a sport-specific Long-Term Athlete Development Model in place. There are now 12 NSOs that have implemented the Model. This is up from 2005–2006 when only one NSO had completed their LTAD model. Sport Canada worked with partners to increase the number of NSOs that have implemented the revised National Coaching Certification Program (NCCP). In 2007–2008, 26 NSOs had conditional approvals, 12 had final approvals. Fifty-one NSOs have now implemented a new NCCP level. Sport Canada worked with partners to increase the number of coaches participating in the NCCP. In 2007–2008, 52 467 coaches participated in a NCCP course, bringing the two-year total to almost 95 000. Sport Canada worked with partners towards support of a full complement of qualified coaches for targeted sports. In 2007–2008, there were 317 NCCP level III, 13 NCCP level IV and 4 NCCP level V certified coaches working with high performance athletes. Sport Canada worked to advanced Canadian interests, values, and ethics in sport at home and abroad. In 2007–2008, the Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport conducted 3 551 doping tests, of which 2 899 were conducted as part of the Canadian Anti-Doping Program. In 2007–2008, 20 Canadian athletes were sanctioned for an anti-doping violation. |
|||||||
In millions of $ | 7. Actual Spending 2005–06 |
8. Actual Spending 2006–07 |
9. Planned Spending 2007–08 |
10. Total Authorities 2007–08 |
11. Actual Spending 2007–08 |
12. Variance(s) Between 9 and 11 |
|
13. Program Activity: Creation of Canadian Content and Performance Excellence | |||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total contributions | 91.7 | 92.6 | 81.9 | 81.9 | 90.0 | (8.1) | |
14. Total Program Activity | 300.8 | 320.8 | 301.3 | 299.6 | 304.1 | (2.8) | |
13. Program Activity: Sustainability of Cultural Expression and Participation | |||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total contributions | 1.3 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.9 | (0.4) | |
14. Total Program Activity | 108.7 | 186.9 | 163.1 | 209.2 | 184.6 | (21.5) | |
13. Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life | |||||||
Total grants | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Total contributions | - | - | 13.8 | 18.8 | 12.3 | 1.5 | |
14. Total Program Activity | 107.9 | 149.7 | 145.3 | 143.2 | 133.6 | 11.7 | |
15. Total TPP | 1,015.7 | 1,150.3 | 1,098.2 | 1,157.5 | 1,117.9 | (19.7) | |
16. Comments on variance(s): Overall variance of ($7 million) is explained as follows:
|
|||||||
17. and 18. Significant audit and evaluation findings and URL(s) to last audit/evaluation: Formative Evaluation of the Participation Elements of the Sport Support Program-(February 24, 2006) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Audit of the National Sport Organization Support Program (February 26, 2003) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Evaluation of the NSO Support Program: National Sport Federation (NSF), Sport Organizations for Athletes with a Disability (SOAD), and Domestic Sport Organization (DSO) Components (February 20, 2002) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Evaluation of the National Sport Organizations Support Program: Multi-Sport/-Service Organization Component (February 20, 2002) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm |
|||||||
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: TV5 Contributions | |||||||
2. Start Date: 1990–1991 | 3. End Date: 2012–2013 | ||||||
4. Description: The TV5 Contributions program contributes to the international showcasing of French-language Canadian television programs by participating in TV5MONDE and offers Canadians programming from the international Francophonie by participating in TV5 Québec-Canada. | |||||||
5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world. | |||||||
6. Results Achieved: For a contribution of approximately 5% (3% Canada and 2% Québec) to TV5MONDE, Canada has ensured that 6.8% of TV5MONDE's programming is Canadian.. The TV5 Québec-Canada programming consists largely of shows that are created with European and African TV5 partners and that are not usually available on other francophone Canadian channels. These TV5 Québec-Canada shows give the Canadian public access to international francophone culture and bring greater awareness of the cultural diversity of the francophone world. This channel also broadcasts 15% Canadian programming, which further makes available and promotes Canadian French-language television. By attracting Canadian and international audiences to francophone television programming, Canadian Heritage promotes Canada internationally, showcases the diversity of the Francophone culture among Canadians, and encourages the creation and production of French-language Canadian programming. |
|||||||
In millions of $ | 7. Actual Spending 2005–06 |
8. Actual Spending 2006–07 |
9. Planned Spending 2007–08 |
10. Total Authorities 2007–08 |
11. Actual Spending 2007–08 |
12. Variance(s) Between 9 and 11 |
|
13. Program Activity: Sustainability of Cultural Expression and Participation | |||||||
Total grants | 4.2 | 4.1 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.7 | 0.3 | |
Total contributions | 2.6 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.0 | (0.5) | |
14. Total Program Activity | 108.7 | 186.9 | 163.1 | 209.2 | 184.6 | (21.5) | |
15. Total TPP | 1,015.7 | 1,150.3 | 1,098.2 | 1,157.5 | 1,117.9 | (19.7) | |
16. Comments on variance(s): Overall variance of ($0.2 million) is explained as follows:
|
|||||||
17. and 18. Significant audit and evaluation findings and URL(s) to last audit/evaluation: Evaluation of federal participation in TV5–Final Report (February 20, 2002) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Audit of Single Recipient Contribution Programs – Summary of Finding TV5 (February 26, 2003) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm |
This transfer payments program is voted, which means that each year the Parliament of Canada votes annual Appropriation Act or Acts to grant expenditure authority to the Crown for the departments and agencies. This spending authorization lapses at year-end.
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Celebration, Commemoration and Learning Program | |||||||
2. Start Date: November 2003 | 3. End Date: 2008–2012 | ||||||
4. Description: The Celebration, Commemoration and Learning Program is a theme-based dynamic approach to celebrating and commemorating significant people, places, symbols, anniversaries, and events. It is delivered in collaboration with other federal departments, agencies, regional offices, partners, and stakeholders. It provides funding to non-profit organizations and Celebrate Canada committees to commemorate important aspects of Canadian history and to carry out initiatives under the five-year national commemorations plan. | |||||||
5. Strategic Outcome: Canadians live in an inclusive society built on intercultural understanding and citizen participation. | |||||||
6. Results Achieved: In 2007, close to 1500 projects received financial assistance to support local and regional activities celebrating Canada Day. Approximately 35 000 people attended the Canada Day Noon Show on Parliament Hill, and nearly 80% of participants responded that the Noon Show contributes to their pride in being Canadian. (Decima Research, 2007) In 2007, more than 15 000 young people across the country participated in the Poster Challenge. The Interdepartmental Commemoration Committee contributed to the development of the five-year national commemorations plan (2008–2012). The plan will identify the major events that are expected to be commemorated and celebrated across the country in the next five years and that will have impact for or be of special interest to all Canadians. The plan will ensure that annual themes are integrated in the many activities that the government and partners initiate every year. This will facilitate continuity and consistency of initiatives across the government. All Canadians, including teachers and students, can access information about Canadian protocol and symbols through the Department's website and publications. The program published a new edition of Symbols of Canada, a series of posters on Canada's historic flags, and a new publication, A Crown of Maples. |
|||||||
In millions of $ | 7. Actual Spending 2005–06 | 8. Actual Spending 2006–07 | 9. Planned Spending 2007–08 | 10. Total Authorities 2007-08 | 11. Actual Spending 2007-08 | 12. Variance(s) Between 9 and 11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13. Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life | |||||||
Total grants | 0.9 | 2.1 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 2.2 | 3.3 | |
Total contributions | 11.9 | 11.6 | 16.0 | 15.0 | 19.3 | (3.3) | |
14. Total Program Activity | 107.9 | 149.7 | 145.3 | 143.2 | 133.6 | 11.7 | |
15. Total TPP | 1,015.7 | 1,150.3 | 1,098.2 | 1,157.5 | 1,117.9 | (19.7) | |
16. Comments on variance(s): n/a |
|||||||
17. and 18. Significant audit and evaluation findings and URL(s) to last audit/evaluation: Summative Evaluation of the Celebration, Commemoration and Learning Program (October 2007) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/evaltn/2007/2007-05/index-eng.cfm Audit of the Celebration, Commemoration and Learning Program (January 25, 2006) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm Formative Evaluation of Celebrate Canada! (October 20, 2004) http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/index-eng.cfm |
1. Name of recipient: Endowment Fund—Canadian Institute for Research on Linguistic Minorities | ||||||||
2. Start date: 2001–2002 |
3. End date: Perpetual |
4. Total funding: $10 million |
||||||
5. Description: Thanks to an endowment funded by the Department of Canadian Heritage, the Canadian Institute for Research on Linguistic Minorities was created in March 2002 for the purpose of becoming a national centre of expertise to better for understand the challenges that official-language minority communities face and the trends in their environment. Although it is housed at the Université de Moncton, it has a national mission. It carries out activities related to official-language minority communities through revenues generated by the Endowment Fund and other revenues. The goal of the Institute is to increase research on issues related to minority official-language communities. More and improved research will ensure that leaders of minority-language communities and officials responsible for developing public policy will have a better understanding of the issues that affect the development of Canada's Francophone and Anglophone minority communities. |
||||||||
6. Strategic Outcome: Canadians live in an inclusive society built on intercultural understanding and citizen participation. | ||||||||
7. Summary of results achieved by the recipient: The Institute contributes significantly to promoting and disseminating fundamental and applied research on Canada's linguistic minorities to the academic community, governments, community organizations, and the general public. In addition to being the architect of several research projects, the Institute also strives to create the conditions that will stimulate research on linguistic minorities. The Institute's annual report and its publications are accessible on its website. Two publications of interest were published during the 2007–08 fiscal year: "Analyse des tendances migratoires des anglophones au Québec" [Trends Analysis of Anglophone Migration in Quebec] and "Les Centre scolaires communautaires (CSC): Relation entre des espaces institutionnels et le vécu langagier d'ayants droits francophones" ["School Community Centres (SCC): A Relationship Between Institutional Spaces and the Language Experience of Francophone Rights Holders"]. | ||||||||
8. Actual Spending 2005–06 |
9. Actual Spending 2006–07 |
10. Planned Spending 2007–08 |
11. Total Authorities 2007-08 |
12. Actual Spending 2007-08 |
13. Variance(s) Between 10 and 12 |
|||
14. Program activity Community Development and Capacity-Building |
$0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
15. Comments on variance(s): n/a |
||||||||
16. Significant evaluation findings and URL(s) to last evaluation(s): A formative evaluation is currently being conducted and will be finalized in fall 2008. | ||||||||
17. Significant audit findings and URL(s) to last audit(s): n/a |
||||||||
18. URL to the recipient's site: http://www.icrml.ca |
||||||||
19. URL to the recipient's annual report: http://www.icrml.ca/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=21&Itemid=141 |
1. Name of Recipient : Global Centre for Pluralism | ||||||||
2. Start Date: 2006–2007 |
3. End Date: Perpetual |
4. Total Funding: $30 million |
||||||
5. Description: The Global Centre for Pluralism is a not-for-profit organization, founded by the Aga Khan Development Network, which addresses a global gap in institutions that advocate pluralism as a foundation for new governance, peace, and human development. | ||||||||
6. Strategic Outcome: Canadians live in an inclusive society built on intercultural understanding and citizen participation. | ||||||||
7. Summary of Results Achieved by the Recipient: In December 2007, a lease agreement was signed by the Global Centre for Pluralism and the Government of Canada (represented by the National Capital Commission) to rent 330 Sussex Drive. The Corporate Plan for 2008–2009 was submitted in February 2008. |
||||||||
8. Actual Spending 2005–06 |
9. Actual Spending 2006–07 |
10. Planned Spending 2007–08 |
11. Total Authorities 2007–08 |
12. Actual Spending 2007–08 |
13. Variance(s) Between 10 and 12 |
|||
14. Program Activity: Participation in Community and Civic Life | $ | $30.0 M | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||
15. Comments on Variance(s) n/a |
||||||||
16. Significant Evaluation Findings and URL(s) to Last Evaluation(s)/Future Plans The Global Centre for Pluralism will carry out an evaluation no less frequently than every five years. |
||||||||
17. Significant Audit Findings and URL(s) to Last Audit(s)/Future Plans The Global Centre for Pluralism will carry out an independent (value-for-money) audit to ensure the economy, efficiency, and effectiveness with which funds have been used, no less than every five years. |
||||||||
18. URL to Recipient's Site http://www.pluralism.ca |
||||||||
19. URL to Recipient's Annual Report The Annual Report for 2007–2008 will be submitted July 31, 2008. |
1. Name of recipient: Grant to the 2010 Games Operating Trust | ||||||||||||||||||||
2. Start date: 2004–2005 |
3. End date: Perpetual |
4. Total funding: $55 million |
||||||||||||||||||
5. Description: In accordance with Multi-Party Agreement (MPA) the Government of Canada and the Province of British Columbia each contributed $55 million to the Legacy Endowment Fund, which is managed by the 2010 Games Operating Trust. The 2010 Games Operating Trust Society is the legal entity that oversees the business activities of the 2010 Games Operating Trust. The Legacy Endowment Fund supports the maintenance and operating expenses of specific 2010 Winter Games sporting venues and to charitable and not-for-profit organizations conducting high performance amateur sport and coach development programming at those venues and elsewhere in Canada. The three legacy facilities receiving the funds are the Richmond Oval (Richmond, BC), Whistler Olympic Park and the Whistler Sliding Centre (Resort Municipality of Whistler, BC). This commitment by the Government of Canada and the Province of British Columbia ensures that Canadians will continue to use the venues and benefit from sport programming well beyond 2010.(http://www.vancouver2010.com) The Board of Directors of the 2010 Games Operating Trust Society consists of eight representatives from the signatories to the MPA (Government of Canada, the Province of British Columbia, the Canadian Olympic Committee, the Canadian Paralympic Committee, the Vancouver Organizing Committee for the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games (VANOC), the City of Vancouver, the City of Richmond, and the Resort Municipality of Whistler). The 2010 Games Operating Trust Society will oversee and manage this Trust until an agreed upon future date or until the end of the Monarchy. Sustainable social, economic, cultural and sports benefits for Canadians are the overall strategic goal for hosting the Olympic Games. Beyond maintaining and operating the three principle venues, the 2010 Games Operating Trust will provide the needed funding to continue high performance programming for Canadian athletes at these venues and elsewhere in Canada. |
||||||||||||||||||||
6. Strategic Outcome: Canadians live in an inclusive society built in intercultural understanding and citizen participation | ||||||||||||||||||||
7. Summary of results achieved by the recipient: The growth of the Legacy Endowment Fund since its creation in 2004–2005 will ensure continued use of the venues and will support sport programming leaving a sustainable legacy for all Canadians beyond 2010. The interest earned on this investment since 2004-2005 has been used to re-capitalize on the fund. During 2007, Whistler Olympic Park officially opened and with the other two venues deemed substantially complete, the 2010 Games Operating Trust Society approved distributions for the operational costs from the Legacy Endowment Fund to the venue owners/operators as follows:
For more information see: http://www.canada2010.gc.ca/finance-fra.cfm Press Release, Canadian Heritage, May 22, 2007: http://www.pch.gc.ca/newsroom/index-eng.cfm?fuseaction=displayDocument&DocIDCd=CDE070377 |
||||||||||||||||||||
8. Actual Spending 2005–06 |
9. Actual Spending 2006–2007 |
10. Planned Spending 2007–2008 |
11. Total Authorities 2007–2008 |
12. Actual Spending 2007–2008 |
13. Variance(s) Between 10 and 12 |
|||||||||||||||
14. Program activity Participation in community and civic life |
$0 | $0 | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
15. Comments on variance(s): : n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||
16. Significant evaluation findings and URL(s) to last evaluation(s): n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||
17. Significant audit findings and URL(s) to last audit(s): http://files.newswire.ca/726/GOT_2008_AFS_Signed_ENG.pdf http://www.cnw.ca/en/releases/archive/June2008/10/c2355.html |
||||||||||||||||||||
18. URL to the recipient's site: http://www.vancouver2010.com |
||||||||||||||||||||
19. URL to the recipient's annual report: |
1. Name of recipient: National Aboriginal Achievement Foundation | |||||||
2. Start date: 2003–2004 |
3. End date: 2009–2010 |
4. Total funding: $22 million |
|||||
5. Description: The National Aboriginal Achievement Foundation (NAAF) promotes the development and education of Aboriginal peoples and their professional advancement in Canadian society. In 2003–2004 Canadian Heritage provided a $12 million endowment for the establishment of an Aboriginal Post-Secondary Scholarship Program. An additional endowment of $10 million was approved in March 2007. The endowment's investment revenues are used to award scholarships and bursaries to Aboriginal post-secondary students. This endowment fund encourages Aboriginal Canadians to achieve higher levels of education to gain the skills and knowledge needed to contribute fully to the economic life of their communities and to Canadian society. More specifically, the scholarship program assists Status Indian, Non-Status Indian, Métis, and Inuit post-secondary students engaged in fields of study that support and contribute to Aboriginal self-government and self-reliance. |
|||||||
6. Strategic Outcome: Canadians live in an inclusive society built on intercultural understanding and citizen participation. | |||||||
7. Summary of results achieved by the recipient: Investment revenues from the endowment provided funding for 185 bursaries to Aboriginal post-secondary students. |
|||||||
8. Actual Spending 2005–06 |
9. Actual Spending 2006–07 |
10. Planned Spending 2007–08 |
11. Total Authorities 2007–08 |
12. Actual Spending 2007–08 |
13. Variance(s) Between 10 and 12 |
||
14. Program activity Participation in community and civic life |
$ | $10 M | $ | $ | $ | $ | |
15. Comments on variance(s): n/a |
|||||||
16. Significant evaluation findings and URL(s) to last evaluation(s): The evaluation is the responsibility of the NAAF. The Department of Canadian Heritage is working with the NAAF on an evaluation, which was originally scheduled for completion by March 31, 2008. The evaluation will take approximately six months, finishing early in 2009. |
|||||||
17. Significant audit findings and URL(s) to last audit(s): There is no audit scheduled for this foundation until 2009–2010. |
|||||||
18. URL to the recipient's site: http://www.naaf.ca |
|||||||
19. URL to the recipient's annual report: http://www.naaf.ca/docs/e/NAAF_AR_2007.pdf |
1. Name of recipient:The Trans Canada Trail Foundation | ||||||||
2. Start date: December 2003 |
3. End date: March 2010 |
4. Total funding: $15 million |
||||||
5. Description: The Trans Canada Trail Foundation leads an initiative, based on widespread voluntary support, to establish a national recreational trail that runs through every Canadian province and territory, linking hundreds of communities. The federal grant for this project is used solely to establish a fund to achieve these objectives: to administer a program of grants to community-based groups in support of the trail-building capital projects (thereby leveraging additional support from other sources); to provide planning for and coordinate development of the Trail; and to establish Trail Pavilions and signage along the route. The Trail will connect Canadians from all regions of the country with each other, with their environment, and with Canada's cultural and natural diversity. |
||||||||
6. Strategic Outcome: Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world | ||||||||
7. Summary of results achieved by the recipient: (within overall departmental results achieved): The path of the Trans Canada Trail is within 30 minutes of 80 percent of the Canadian population. 13 852 km is completed of the 20 790 km, which represents 67 percent of the distance:
|
||||||||
8. Actual Spending 2005–06 |
9. Actual Spending 2006–07 |
10. Planned Spending 2007–08 |
11. Total Authorities 2007–08 |
12. Actual Spending 2007–08 |
13. Variance(s) Between 10 and 12 |
|||
14. Program activity Access and participation in Canada's cultural life |
$ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 | ||
15. Comments on variance(s): The total grant of $15 million was paid to the Foundation in 2003–2004. No variance. |
||||||||
16. Significant evaluation findings and URL(s) to last evaluation(s): Not applicable |
||||||||
17. Significant audit findings and URL(s) to last audit(s): Not applicable |
||||||||
18. URL to the recipient's site: http://www.tctrail.ca/home.php?l=en |
||||||||
19. URL to the recipient's annual report: Financial statements of the Foundation are available on the Trans Canada Trail website at http://www.tctrail.ca/Financial_Statements.php |
1. Name of Horizontal Initiative: Action Plan for Official Languages | |||
2. Name of lead department: Department of Canadian Heritage |
3. Lead department program activity: Corporate (Internal) Services |
||
4. Start Date: April 1, 2003 | 5. End Date: March 31, 2008 | ||
6. Total Federal Funding Allocation: $787.3 M (In April 2005, a 3-year allocation (2005-08) in the amount of $36.0 M was added to the original amount of $751.3M, for the Enabling Fund, a program administered by the Department of Human Resources and Social Development.) | |||
7. Description: The Action Plan is a policy statement of the Government of Canada that strengthens the implementation obligations under the Official Languages Act and includes a number of initiatives aimed at the enhancement and promotion of linguistic duality in Canadian society. Ten (10) federal institutions received funds for sectoral programs and activities related to official languages (OL). Another key component of the Action Plan is the implementation of an accountability framework and the establishment of overall coordination of government-wide processes relating to official languages. The implementation of the Action Plan is a component of the wider Official Languages Program (OLP) as it has been defined and approved by the Committee of Deputy Ministers on Official Languages (CDMOL) in December 2004. | |||
8. Shared Outcomes: Three levels of results have been identified for the Official Languages Program:Ultimate ResultCanadians enjoy the benefit of linguistic duality; live and work in communities that reflect Canadian values with respect to the use of English and French, and have access to government services in the language of their choice.Intermediate Results
|
|||
9. Governance Structures (within Canadian Heritage): The Minister responsible for Official Languages has specific responsibility for the implementation of the Action Plan for Official Languages. The Official Languages Branch (OLB) of Intergovernmental Affairs (IGA) became the Official Languages Secretariat (OLS) when it was transferred to the Department of Canadian Heritage on February 6, 2006. The OLS will continue to support the Minister responsible for Official Languages and the activities related to the horizontal coordination of the Official Languages Program, including implementation of the Action Plan. OLS will also support the overall governance of the Official Languages Program through various mechanisms and committees. |
List of Federal Partners
Detailed sub-tables are included for each federal partner:
A. | |||
10. Federal Partners | Canadian Heritage | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | PA 8: Corporate services | ||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | a. Accountability and Coordination Framework (Formerly with Privy Council Office) |
||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $13.5M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$2.0M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$1,715,768 | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Better horizontal communication between federal institutions. Increased exchanges and improved communication between federal institutions and official language minority communities (OLMCs). Increased exchanges and improved cooperation between the federal government and the provinces and territories. Better scientific and empirical knowledge of linguistic duality in Canada. |
||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | The Official Languages Secretariat (OLS) held two regular meetings of the three interdepartmental committees on policy, evaluation and research, and ensured successful horizontal communication among federal institutions. Public consultations on linguistic duality and official languages were held in seven cities in Canada in December 2007 and January 2008, under the leadership of Mr Bernard Lord. The OLS provided support to multilateral meetings, such as the Ministerial Conference on Canadian Francophonie in 2007. It also served as a facilitator, and maintained continuous dialogue with the provinces and territories. The SLO held a symposium in January 2008 in Ottawa to clarify official languages research issues. It was attended by 165 stakeholders from the academic community, and community and government representatives. A document was published following the symposium. In December 2007, a preliminary report was published by Statistics Canada on the Survey on the Vitality of Official-Language Minorities (SVOLM). The Survey was funded by a number of departments and the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages, and will lead to the publication of new reports based on SVOLM data |
||
10. Federal Partners | Canadian Heritage | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | PA 6: Community development and capacity building PA 5: Promotion of intercultural understanding |
||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | b. Education –minority language & second-language | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $346.0M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$86.4M (does not include operating funds) | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$94,716,587 | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Implementation by provinces and territories of agreements and action plans' | ||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | The multi-year education agreements with the Council of Ministers of Education (CMEC) and the provinces and territories were implemented in 2007–2008. In minority language education, Action Plan spending to date has been concentrated mainly in four areas:
|
||
10. Federal Partners | Canadian Heritage | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | PA 6: Community development and capacity building PA 5: Promotion of intercultural understanding |
||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | c. Bursary Program | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $24.0M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$7.2M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$7.2M | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Continue the implementation and promotion of the new programs Destination Clic and Explore. | ||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | Continued implementation and promotion of the programs Explore and Destination Clic, which provide language learning and development bursaries for Canadian students. During the first four years of implementation of the Action Plan, the federal government has increased the number of bursary program participants by 23% and the value of each bursary by 9%. |
||
10. Federal Partners | Canadian Heritage | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | PA 6: Community development and capacity building PA 5: Promotion of intercultural understanding |
||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | d. Official Languages Monitor Program | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $11.5M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 | $3.6M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$3.6M | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Continue the implementation and promotion of the new programs Accent and Odyssey. | ||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | Continued implementation and promotion of the Accent and Odyssey programs. These programs provide educational institutions with full- and part-time language monitors to assist teachers with language and learning and development by Canadian students, enabling the monitors to practise their second language or their mother tongue and deepen their appreciation for Canada's cultural diversity. | ||
10. Federal Partners | Canadian Heritage | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | PA 6: Community development and capacity building | ||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | e. Support to minority communities | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $19.0M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$4.05M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$4,057,025 | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Investment in priority areas for the communities, i-e, culture, communication and promotion of community activities. | ||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | The Department of Canadian Heritage targeted community radio stations, cultural outreach and participatory activities. Funds were allocated to community organizations to help them offer a range of activities contributing to increased use of their official language by Canadians living in OLMCs. Regular use of a language is one way of preserving it. | ||
10. Federal Partners | Canadian Heritage | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | PA 6: Community development and capacity building. | ||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | f. Intergovernmental Cooperation | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $14.5M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$4.05M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$4,164,582 | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Foster the development of provincial and territorial services in priority areas | ||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | The provinces and territories play a key role in the development and vitality of OLMCs. Through the Action Plan, Canadian Heritage has increased support to the provinces and territories for intergovernmental cooperation in minority language services. This funding has made it possible to assist the development and implementation of concrete measures to improve the level of service available in areas of provincial jurisdiction, other than education, considered priorities for OLMCs. | ||
10. Federal Partners | Canadian Heritage | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | PA 5: Promotion of intercultural understanding PA 6: Community development and capacity building |
||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | g. Research and administration | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $0.0 | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$9.7M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$9.7M | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Program administration and special research initiatives. | ||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | Funds were allocated to program administration and specific research initiatives. The latter contribute to policy and program orientation. For example, during the years covered by the Action Plan, funding made it possible to contribute to the SVOLM and to research on the factors contributing to the vitality of OLMCs in northern communities. | ||
B. | |||
10. Federal Partners | Public Service Human Resources Management Agency of Canada (Formerly with Treasury Board Secretariat | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | N/A | ||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | a) Investing in Innovation | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $14 M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$0.0 | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
N/A | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | N/A | ||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | N/A | ||
10. Federal Partners | Public Service Human Resources Management Agency of Canada (Formerly with Treasury Board Secretariat | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | PA 1: Strategic orientation, partnership and integration program | ||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | b. Centre of Excellence | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $12.0M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$3.0M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$3.0M | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Continue improving accountability for official languages and service to Canadians; progressively promote the emergence of a shared and consolidated vision of the concepts of a bilingual workplace. Carry out the information campaign to promote the emergence of a shared and consolidated vision of the concept of a bilingual workplace. |
||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | PA 1: Strategic orientation, partnership and integration program –SA1, SSA4: Official languages policy
The Agency: - ensured that OL policy instruments were up to date and consistent with current circumstances, and allowed relatively uniform government-wide application of the provisions of the OLA respecting service to the public, language of work, equitable participation by both communities, equal employment and promotion opportunities within institutions, the setting of language requirements and access to language training; - launched an information campaign, in conjunction with eight departments, agencies and Crown corporations, designed to establish official languages more firmly among the core values of Canadian society (respect, fairness and inclusion); to inform employees of their rights and obligations, and the federal government's responsibilities towards OLMCs; and to promote linguistic duality. The purpose of the campaign is to prepare the way for a change of culture and exert a positive influence on employee attitudes and behaviour. - provided federal institutions with an interpretation service for OL policy instruments. - provided institutions with support, opinions and advice to assist them in applying the provisions of the policy instruments. - prepared and distributed Determining the linguistic profile of bilingual positions, a tool to assist managers. - arranged meetings and workshops to give persons responsible for official languages in federal institutions a better understanding of the requirements of the OLA and the policy instruments.PA 1: Strategic orientation, partnership and integration program – SA 3 (Partnerships and alignments) SSA 1 (Champions, networks and communities of interest) The Agency held two regular meetings and a retreat for each of the two OL advisory committees. The work of these committees makes it possible to ensure that the persons responsible for official languages in institutions are better equipped to carry out their duties under the OLA by giving them an opportunity to learn about the latest developments, take part in consultations, exchange information, and broaden their knowledge of the OLP; - held its third annual forum on best practices. The theme of the 2007 edition was "Official Languages Enhanced by Good Practices." Some 300 people attended; - held the 2007 edition of the annual conference of OL champions in Summerside, PEI. The theme for this event was Les langues officielles : au cœur de nos valeurs fondamentales. Participants shared ideas, learned about the circumstances of the Acadian community and discussed OL challenges in general. - held four briefings for newly-appointed OL champions, attended by some 40 champions and co-champions; - participated as an active member in the six meetings of the Council of the Network of Departmental Official Languages Champions, and related activities. PA 3 (Integrity and sustainability program) – SA 3 (Reports), SSA 2 (Report on official languages) The Agency: - regularly monitored OL management controls and practices by establishing regular contact with the persons responsible for official languages in institutions. - analysed the performance of each institution through the annual review exercise, using a risk-management approach, and reported to institutions any potential risks or areas for improvement. - collected information for the annual report on official languages (including the collection of outstanding best practices and those leading to economies of scale). - designed and used a new electronic tool for the horizontal analysis of annual OL reviews provided by institutions. The tool greatly simplifies horizontal analysis and makes it even more systematic, since the information is compared with data from information systems, general knowledge of the files and information gleaned from the Agency's support and monitoring activities. - assessed the performance of institutions in the context of the Management Accountability Framework (MAF). - conducted five audits on: active offer in the NCR; supervision at Export Development Canada; supervision at the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions; new obligations respecting communication with the public and service delivery (Saskatchewan and Manitoba); active offer and service to the public in bilingual offices (Saskatchewan and Manitoba). |
||
C. | |||
10. Federal Partners | Canada School of Public Service (Formerly with Treasury Board Secretariat) | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | N/A | ||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Rebuilding Capacity | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $38.6M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$0.0M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
N/A | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | N/A | ||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | N/A | ||
D. | |||
10. Federal Partners | Health Canada | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | PA: Canadian health system | ||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | a. Networking | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $14.0M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$3.0M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$6.3M | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Improved access to health services in the language of choice. Improved health of Canadians in OLMCs. Increased networking among health professionals and policy makers with respect to OLMC health care access issues. Implementation of information-exchange mechanisms between health partners and OLMC members. Increased commitment by health partners to improve health care services. |
||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | French-Speaking Official Language Minority Communities Since the launch of Community Networking Support in 2003, seventeen networks have been established and are operational in all provinces and territories where Francophones are in a minority situation. These networks bring together representatives of each of the five main partners involved in improving access to French-language health services, i.e., health professions, managers of health institutions, political decision-makers, academic institutions and the communities. Educating and bringing these partners together in order to get their concrete support and commitment has been one of the networks' key activities, and probably their greatest success to date. Many of the activities have resulted in mobilizing the various stakeholders, for example, meetings every four to twelve weeks of committees composed of representatives of the five stakeholder groups, training workshops for health care professionals, the organization of conferences, and the launch of initiatives relating to access to health services. Networks have been recognized, to varying degrees according to province and territory, as key stakeholders. Seven networks in four provinces (Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick, Ontario and Manitoba) have received formal recognition by their respective provincial departments of health. Over half the networks have established informal relations with the provincial/territorial governments in their jurisdictions, and with other health partners. Each network has:
http://santefrancais.ca English-Speaking Official Language Minority Communities Eleven formal networks are bringing together English-speaking minority communities and service providers at the local, regional and provincial levels. Most of these networks are working to integrate primary health care initiatives and language training, retention and distance service projects. This strategy has ensured that community participants in each network have a vital minimum capacity to mobilize and create networks with public partners. Two of these networks have been established to address sector and provincial needs. The Fraser Recovery Program provides programs to prevent youth and adult substance abuse. The Community Health and Social Services Network (CHSSN) fosters projects and initiatives through partnership and network building to promote access to English-language health and social services and support the vitality of English-speaking minority communities. The provincial network (CHSSN) has linked all the network units.
|
||
10. Federal Partners | Health Canada | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | PA: Canadian health system | ||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | b. Training and Retention | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $75.0M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$20.0M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$25.0M | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Improved access to health services in the language of choice. Improved health of Canadians in official language minority communities.Increased capacity for training of health professionals within OLMCs.Increased number of health professionals to meet the needs of OLMCs.Improved quality and quantity of health care services available to OLMCs. |
||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | French-Speaking Official Language Minority Communities The summative evaluation of the Health Care Training and Research Project of the Consortium national de formation en santé (CNFS) identifies a number of success factors for the project's 5-year history (2003 to 2008).
English-Speaking Official Language Minority Communities McGill University was allocated $11.5M for its Training and Human Resources Development Project. The project consists of four measures that are being implemented over a 3.5-year period (October 2004–March 2008).
In 2005–2006, English language training was provided to 1 427 workers in 15 of Quebec's health and social services regions. In 2006–2007, 1 993 workers received English-language training in 17 regions. The latter represents 93% of the target which was set by McGill for 2006–2007. The target number of French-speaking health professionals for which English-language courses will be provided in 2007–2008 has been targeted at 2 000. For more information regarding the achievements of the Training and retention activities for English-speaking minority communities, please consult the website of the McGill Training and Human Resources Development Project at http://www.mcgill.ca/hssaccess/ |
||
10. Federal Partners | Health Canada | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | |||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | c. Primary Health Care Transition Fund | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $30.0M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$0.0 | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
N/A | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | This $30M component of the Action Plan for primary health care initiatives was originally funded until March 2006 and later extended to September 2006. Additional program funds of $10M were approved for projects in 2006–2007. There is currently no provision to fund these activities in 2007–2008. | ||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | N/A | ||
Total | |||
E. | |||
10. Federal Partners | Human Resources and Social Development Canada | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | PA: Learning and Workplace Skills | ||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | a. Literacy | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $7.4M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$1.1M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$1.3M | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | The integration of a results-based management approach by partner organizations in the Family Literacy Initiative. An increased number of family literacy activities in OLMCs.Training for family literacy for practitioners operating in a minority-francophone context.Implementation of a network of family literacy practitioners among literacy trainers in OLMC context.Réseau d'experts en alphabétisation familiale –Annual activities report.Summative evaluation of the family literacy initiative in OLMCs.Hosting a family literacy conference:
|
||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | A summative evaluation of the Centre de leadership en évaluation was undertaken at the request of the Fédération canadienne d'alphabétisation en français. 1 237 people have completed family literacy training sessions.36 new family literacy trainers and stakeholders participated in the training.11 provincial/territorial francophone literacy organizations members of the Fédération canadienne d'alphabétisation en français continued to maintain links with diverse community stakeholders (associations of parents, daycares, libraries, municipalities, etc.)The annual report for 2007–2008 of the Fédération canadienne d'alphabétisation en français was released in May 2008.Evaluation completed by the Office of Literacy and Essential Skills and submitted to the Department of Canadian Heritage in September 2007. A 2e Colloque en alphabétisation familiale from the Fédération canadienne pour l'alphabétisation en français (FCAF) was held on March 6 and 7, 2008 in Ottawa.Meetings of the Family Literacy Research Steering Committee were held to prepare a conference on the development of a francophone literacy research network from April 23 to 25, 2008 in Montreal: L'alphabétisation en français à l'heure des réseaux et des communautés d'échanges en ligne. |
||
10. Federal Partners | Human Resources and Social Development Canada | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | PA: Labour Market | ||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | b. Internships | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $7.3M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$0.0 | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$1.7M | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | $7.3M comes from the Summer Work Experience program. This funding is the commitment as stated in the Action Plan for Official Languages for the period of 2003 to 2008. To date the number of internships (650) expected has been largely exceeded. As per the last report (May 2006) a total of 1 144 young people received an employment experience for OLMCs. | ||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | 1 865 internships in OLMCs through the Youth Employment Strategy | ||
10. Federal Partners | Human Resources and Social Development Canada | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | |||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | c. enabling fund | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $36.0M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$12.0M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$11.8M | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Continued viability of the infrastructures and networks as mechanisms for government supporting OLMCs. Improved knowledge of official language minority communities from community profiles; the information will be used to guide funding decisions, benchmarking and assessing progress and future evaluation.Increased OLMCs' capacity, at the organization and network levels, to produce community development plans and projects.Increased capacity of local human resources in official language minority communities to promote and implement their own development.Increased community vitality, including economic and job growth in OLMCs. |
||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | The Enabling Fund was renewed for 2008–2009 and the program will also be considered for the future federal strategy on official languages An independent evaluation showed notable progress in the capacity of the networks in creating partnerships and initiatives for community economic and human resources developmentEach community benefits from a community profile and a plan for economic development.The program managed to leverage $14.1M from non federal sources for a total of $24M.Furthermore, each permanent employee of the provincial and territorial RDÉEs generated an average of 24 indirect jobs that would otherwise not be created without their involvement. |
||
10. Federal Partners | Human Resources and Social Development Canada | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | PA: Policy, Research and Communication | ||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | d. Pilot Projects for Child Care | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $10.8M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$3.1M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$2.5M | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Implementation of the pilot-child project in five minority Francophone communities | ||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | The pilot project has been implemented in six minority Francophone communities | ||
10. Federal Partners | Human Resources and Social Development Canada | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | PA: Social Investment | ||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | e. Development of NGO Capacity | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $3.8M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$0.68M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$0.65M | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Production of French language learning materials to enable parents and community-based parent organizations to promote French language early childhood development programs in official language minority communities by making investments in national francophone non-government organizations | ||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | The National Table on Early Childhood Development (ECD) developed an ECD Framework for francophone OLMCs. The Framework establishes the vision of the various sectors operating in early childhood and sets out an implementation strategy for advancing ECD. The Framework was approved by all sectors that are part of the National ECD Table, and a strategic link was made particularly with four sectors: education, health, justice and immigration. Production of materials such as a guide for identity building in the home for parents, a hands-on cross-sector collaboration guide and a study on the implementation costs of centers for integrated early childhood development services |
||
F. | |||
10. Federal Partners | Industry Canada | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | SPA: Section 41, Official Languages Act SPA: Language Industry Program and Canadian Apparel and Textile Industries Program SPA: Virtual Francommunities |
||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | a. Outreach and Counselling | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $8.0M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$1.0M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$2.2M | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Maintain established Industry Canada network of at least one full-time counsellor per region to liaise and assist Official Language Minority Communities (OLMCs). Continue to increase presence and understanding of Industry Canada programs and services to OLMCs in all Industry Canada regions. The outreach and communications activities are geared towards levering the OLMCs to increase their participation in Industry Canada's existing programs |
||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | Outcome achieved:The Network of Counsellors and Coordinators continued operating until March 31, 2008 Outcome achieved - Action taken: - Joint consultations with Industry Canada (IC), the regional development agencies (RDAs) and OLMC representatives - Regional briefings and participation in meetings and conferences by officials from the Network of Counsellors and Coordinators Outcome achieved - Action taken: - development of new communication and marketing products Indicator: - a study of participation by OLMCs in IC and RDA programs shows that OLMCs receive funding proportional to their representation in the Canadian community |
||
10. Federal Partners | Industry Canada | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | SPA: Section 41, Official Languages Act SPA: Language Industry Program and Canadian Apparel and Textile Industries Program SPA: Virtual Francommunities |
||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | b. Internships | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $2.0M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$0.8M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$0.8M | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Continue developing partnerships for internship initiatives to support an increase in the number of skilled workers, new or enhanced businesses and the adoption of emerging technologies to meet the targets set out in the Treasury Board submission to invest $2M over 4 years to create 200 internships | ||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | Outcome achieved 45 internships completed in 2007–2008 |
||
10. Federal Partners | Industry Canada | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | SPA: Section 41, Official Languages Act SPA: Language Industry Program and Canadian Apparel and Textile Industries Program SPA: Virtual Francommunities |
||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | c. Pilot Projects (Tele-Training; Tele-Learning) | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $10.0M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$1.5M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$1.6M | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Develop partnerships with universities, colleges and non-profit corporations to initiate pilot projects to bring leading-edge technologies to OLMCs as per the $10M allocation over 5 years identified in the Treasury Board submission to expand the content and applications for tele-education and for tele-training. | ||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | Outcome achieved: 16 pilot projects funded in 2007–2008. | ||
10. Federal Partners | Industry Canada | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | SPA: Section 41, Official Languages Act SPA: Language Industry Program and Canadian Apparel and Textile Industries Program SPA: Virtual Francommunities |
||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | d. Francommunautés virtuelles | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $13.0M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$4.0M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$4.5M | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Support up to 50 new projects under the current competition for funding. Carry out a summative evaluation of the program. |
||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | Outcome achieved: 26 new projects supported in 2007–2008; 12 projects begun in 2006–2007 and completed in 2007–2008 Outcome achieved: The evaluation report will be studied by the IC Audit and Evaluation Committee in June 2008. |
||
10. Federal Partners | Industry Canada | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | SPA: Section 41, Official Languages Act SPA: Language Industry Program and Canadian Apparel and Textile Industries Program SPA: Virtual Francommunities |
||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | e. Canadian Network of Language Industries | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $5.0M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$1.0M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$1.0M | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Representative Association recognized by governments and the industry. Support the development and the adoption of Canadian quality standards for translation services and language training schools. Consolidation of language training sector. Exit strategy implemented. |
||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | Outcome achieved: AILIA made representations to the Standing Committee on OL, the Lord consultations and several departments (IC, PWGSC, DFAIT, PCH). In an inquiry, AILIA members acknowledged the importance of the work completed. Through hard work by the various partners, standards for translation services are now awaiting approval by the Standards Council of Canada. There is now a single standard for public and private schools. Outcome achieved: Since March 2008, a single association has represented the sector. A strategy was developed and implemented. It covers four aspects: communication, human resources, finance and information management |
||
10. Federal Partners | Industry Canada | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | SPA: Section 41, Official Languages Act SPA: Language Industry Program and Canadian Apparel and Textile Industries Program SPA: Virtual Francommunities |
||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | f. Marketing and Branding | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $5.0M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$1.0M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$0.6M | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Maximize use of the funding for the language industry program. Increased knowledge of and access to national and international markets. Continued support for the development and promotion of the industry. |
||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | Outcome achieved : 75% of total funding was awarded to industry, and used. Four market studies have been completed or published. Continued support for the activities of AILIA, and program management. Promotion of the industry to the various stakeholders: governments, organizations and corporations. |
||
G. | |||
10. Federal Partners | National Research Council Canada | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | PA: Information technology | ||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Institute for Information Technology - Language Technologies Research Group | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $10.0M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$2.6M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$2,579,436 | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Our aim is to create scientific and technological advances for the benefits of our clients. In 2007–08, we will continue to drive forward our technology in statistical machine translation (SMT), securing its highly competitive status on the international scene. We will protect these gains with patents and we will publish the results in top ranking journals and conferences. Our SMT technology will be deployed in smart user-oriented applications, providing translators and terminologists with a range of novel aids. These will include: assistance for the development and maintenance of multilingual terminology, aids for translation capture (e.g. translation dictation), aids for translation authoring (e.g. SMT-enriched translation memory systems) as well as aids for translation checking. These efforts will be done jointly with our partners at the LTRC, our national partners (i.e. universities) and several international partners. Lastly, we aim to produce this year at least one technology transfer to the private industry. | ||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | Nightingale consortium, GALE research program of the DARPA agency (U.S. Department of Defence) This activity has helped us ensure and demonstrate that our machine translation technology is world-class. Jointly with some of our Nightingale partners, we have continued to provide competitive Chinese-to-English machine translation technology to the satisfaction of the client (DARPA). As a result, our funding was not only renewed for the upcoming third year but also increased by 50% with the previous year. SMART consortium, IST program from the European community The SMART consortium has started to test the applicability of new machine learning methods (such as kernel regression techniques) to the problem of machine translation. Preliminary results are very encouraging. Collaboration Systran/NRC A hybrid system combining Systran and NRC's Portage has yielded excellent results in international competitions. Business discussions have been initiated. |
||
H. | |||
10. Federal Partners | Justice Canada | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | PA: Services to government | ||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | a. Accountability and Coordination Framework | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $2.5M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$0.35M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$0.37M | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Federal institutions use legal tools to meet their duties under the OLA. Legal services on language rights are improved. Federal institutions have improved knowledge of their duties under the law. |
||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | A guide to the implementation of Part VII was developed jointly with the OLS. The DOJ evaluation found that legal services had improved. Awareness activities for federal public servants were offered once again in 2007–2008. |
||
10. Federal Partners | Justice Canada | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | PA: Justice, policy, legislation and programs | ||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | b. Legal Obligations (i) Contraventions |
||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $27..0M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$4.7M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$1.6M$ | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Amendments have been made to the agreements and regulations with Ontario, British Columbia, Manitoba and Nova Scotia. New agreements are expected with Saskatchewan, Alberta, Newfoundland and Labrador and the City of Mississauga. These amendments will provide that services will be accessible and that there will be an active offer of service in both official languages wherever demand is sufficient. |
||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | Discussions were undertaken with Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland and Labrador. No agreement reached in 2007–2008. | ||
10. Federal Partners | Justice Canada | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | PA: Services to government | ||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | b. Legal Obligations (ii) Bill S-41: The Legislative Instruments Re-Enactment Act |
||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | |||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$0.4M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$0.6M | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | In conformity with subsection 9(1) of the Act the Minister of Justice has completed a review of the implementation and operation of s. 4 of the Act. As well, under s. 9 of the Act, the Minister of Justice also has to submit a report on the review to each House of Parliament by June 13, 2008. | ||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | Between December 2007 and June 2008, 259 legislative instruments were re-enacted through five regulations The review report on the implementation of s. 4 of the Act is scheduled to be tabled in both Houses of Parliament on June 12, 2008. |
||
10. Federal Partners | Justice Canada | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | PA: Justice, policy, legislation and programs | ||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | c. Access to Justice | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $18.5M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$4.1M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$3.7M | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Increased capacity to respond to issues related to access to justice in both official languages. Better informed public and legal communities. |
||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | The summative evaluation of the Support Fund indicates that it is relevant and effective and that the projects funded have helped improve access to justice in both official languages and the ability of those concerned to provide such services. The Support Fund has helped associations of French-speaking jurists to discharge their mandate more effectively, contributed to the development of language tools for lawyers and the training of jurists, and made it possible for stakeholders to come together to combine their efforts. Activities undertaken through the Support Fund have achieved significant successes. First, while it was expected that partnerships would develop between participants, the power of the networks and the cooperation that resulted were not expected. Second, the associations of French-speaking jurists enjoy greater prominence within their respective community networks and have credibility as advocacy agencies. Third, jurilinguistic centres have been able to develop internationally-recognized expertise in their field. |
||
I. | |||
10. Federal Partners | Citizenship and Immigration Canada | ||
11. Federal Partner Program Activity PA) | PA1: Immigration Program PA 2: Temporary Resident Program PA 4: Refugee Program PA 5: Integration Program |
||
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Support to Communities | ||
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) | $9.0M | ||
14. Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
$2.0M | ||
15. Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
$1,965,750 | ||
16. Expected Results for 2007–2008 | Implement the Strategic Plan to Foster Immigration to Francophone Minority Communities (FMC). Promote immigration abroad, improve the reception capacity of Francophone minority communities, and strengthen their reception and settlement infrastructures for Francophone newcomers to facilitate their social and cultural integration. Coordinate the Steering Committee and the Implementation Committee, and support research on the FMCs. | ||
17. Results achieved in 2007-08 | Implementation of the Strategic Plan to Foster Immigration to Francophone Minority Communities and coordination of the Steering Committee and the Implementation Committee CIC – FMC Steering Committee met in September 2007 and approved three additional priorities to those presented in its strategic plan to foster immigration to FMCs and the annual report presented by the Implementation Committee. Regional sub-committees on francophone immigration continued to work on the implementation of the Strategic Plan. Promotion abroad Small- and large- scale promotion and recruitment events were organized and promotional material was developed. For example, "Destination Canada" took place in November 2007 in Paris, Lyon, Brussels and Tunis. Improvement of the absorption capacity of FMCs and reinforcement of intake and settlement structures for French-speaking newcomers to assist their social and cultural integration. Several networks were implemented across Canada to ensure coordination of immigration of French-speaking immigrants to FMCs. Awareness activities were organized in schools and in the community. Initiatives and tools to facilitate the social and economic integration of French-speaking immigrants to FMCs were also funded. Support for research CIC funded and participated in events that furthered a better understanding of factors surrounding the immigration and integration of French-speaking newcomers to Canada. For example the Journée de réflexion sur l'immigration francophone was organized by CIC Metropolis in Toronto in March 2007 and in April 2008 in Moncton and CIC contributed to an article in the spring 2008 edition of the magazine Canadian Issues on immigration and diversity in FMCs. |
||
Total Allocation (from start to end date | Planned Spending for 2007–2008 |
Actual Spending for 2007-08 |
|
Total : | $787.4 M | $183.0M | $198.9M |
18. Comments on the variance : N/A | |||
19. Results to be achieved by Non-Federal Partners (if applicable): | N/A | ||
20. Contact : olslo@pch.gc.ca | http://www.pch.gc.ca/slo-ols/ | Approved by:Jérôme Moisan Date approved: June 20th, 2008 |
1. Name of horizontal initiative:2010 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games – Delivering on our Commitments | |
2. Name of lead department(s):Department of Canadian Heritage | 3. Lead department program activity: PA2 – Sustainability of cultural expression and participation PA7 – Participation in community and civic life |
4. Start dateof the horizontal initiative: Fiscal Year 2003–2004 |
5. End date of the horizontal initiative: March 31st, 2012 |
6. Total federal funding allocation (start to end date): $622.1M (2004–05 to 2011–12) | |
7. Description of the Horizontal Initiative: To monitor and report on the Government of Canada's contribution to the 2010 Winter Games, which engage Canadians from across the country; reflect Canadian values and priorities in their planning, delivery, and international profile, and promote opportunities to advance public policy goals and to make strategic investments that support long-term tangible economic benefits, and sport, social, cultural and environmental legacies for all Canadians. (http://www.pch.gc.ca). The Government of Canada is a key partner in the 2010 Winter Games. The 2010 Federal Secretariat within the Department of Canadian Heritage works horizontally to support and promote federal engagement in the planning and delivering the Games, which includes providing high quality essential federal services, as well as capital and legacy funding. The 2010 Federal Secretariat works with its partners and stakeholders to leverage the Games as an opportunity to advance public policy objectives, establish lasting legacies, and derive maximum benefit for all Canadians. (www.canada2010.gc.ca). |
|
8. Shared Outcomes:
|
|
9. Governance Structures (within the Department of Canadian Heritage) 2010 Federal Games Secretariat Representative Working Group (RWG) The 2010 Federal Secretariat, under the leadership of the Deputy Minister of Canadian Heritage, supports the Framework for Federal Coordination (FFC). The FCC is the primary mechanism for promoting horizontal management of the Winter Games. This governance structure consists of three levels:
|
10. Federal Partners |
11. Federal Partner Program Activity (PA) |
12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners |
13. Total Allocation (from start to end date) |
14. Planned Spending for 2007–08 |
15. Actual Spending for 2007–08 |
16. Expected Results for 2007–08 |
17. Results Achieved in 2007–08 |
1. Canadian Heritage | Strategic Outcome 1 :1 Canadians express and share their diverse cultural experiences with each other and the world. PA2: Sustainability of cultural expression and participation |
$ | $122.7M | $ | Increased opportunities for federal visibility on 2010 activities; Improved relations with partners and with the 2010 Federal Framework for Coordination (FFC); Diligent spending on all aspects of federal funding. |
Pursued activities to foster positive domestic and international exposure and to help make these 'Canada's Games' Protecting Canadian investment by monitoring progress and performing due diligence on the venue construction program. Ensuring effective coordination and delivery of essential federal services and strategic opportunities through various coordinating mechanisms such as Issue Clusters and the Government Operations Steering Team. |
|
Strategic outcome 2 Canadians live in an inclusive society built on intercultural understanding and citizen participation. PA 7: Participation in community and civic life |
|||||||
B. Royal Canadian mounted Police (RCMP), Public Safety Canada, Department of National Defence (DND), Canadian Security Intelligence Agency (CSIS) Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) |
N/A | Police and Security | $87.5M | For reasons of national security, the Security Group has asked that the information not be released | For reasons of national security, the Security Group has asked that the information not be released | Partners and stakeholders are engaged in developing intelligence-led strategic and operational plans | Strategic and operational plans are being developed in consultation with partners and stakeholders Agreements have been put in place and several Memorandum of Understanding have been completed while others are currently being developed New partners have recently joined the Vancouver Integrated Security Unit in Vancouver. Formal channels for exchange of information have been established. |
C. Canadian Border Services Agency | Access | Security | $15.8M | $1.2M | $1.5M | Operational and logistics planning Input to the design, development and implementation planning for the Olympic Identity and Accreditation Card Process | Integrated Operational framework, planning teams and HR strategic planning initiated. Olympic Accreditation Working Group formed, Accreditation Process conceptual design consultation initiated, detail design initiated, Government of Canada approach and partnership agreement achieved. Olympic Federal Coordination Issue Clusters participation |
D. Citizenship and Immigration | Maximum contribution to Canada's economic, social and cultural development from migration | Temporary Resident Program | $5.0M | $0.3M | $0.25 | Operational planning and logistics planning. Input to design and creation of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) card | Operational and logistical planning underway. Input to design and handling of IOC card in progress. Regulatory amendments in development. |
E. Human Resources and Social Development Canada | Enhanced Canadian productivity and participation through efficient and inclusive labour markets, competitive workplaces and access to learning. | Foreign workers and immigrants | $1.3M | $0.2M | $0 | Operational planning and logistics of planning on entry of foreign workers | The entry of foreign workers is incorporated into the larger nationwide Foreign Worker Program. |
F. Health Canada | Reduced health and environmental risks from products and substances, and safer living and working environments. | Healthy environments and consumer safety Health Protection of Foreign DignitariesHealth Protection of travelling publicHealth Protection of Public Servants | $2.6M | - | $0 | Planning of activities to be undertaken in 2008-09. | Continue strategic planning to ensure the delivery of health services to foreign dignitaries attending the 2010 Winter Games and undertake measures to ensure the health and safety of federal employees working on location. Met with stakeholders to identify requirements and establish the basis for collaboration.Ongoing planning to provide public health services related to conveyances and ancillary services to protect the health of the traveling public. |
G.G.Environment Canada | Weather and environmental predictions and services reduce risks and contribute to the well-being of Canadians. | Improved knowledge and information on weather and environmental conditions influence decision-making. | $9.3M | $0.8M | $0.8M | Infrastructures and supporting technologies for Olympic weather services are developed | Completed Olympic surface weather observing network (32 observing platforms), as well as a profiling microwave radiometer. Produced meteorological studies pertinent to the Games' operations. Trained 32 meteorologists on local winter weather conditions for Games' operations. |
Canada's natural capital is restored, conserved and enhanced. | Canadians adopt approaches that ensure the sustainable use and management of natural capital and working landscapes. | $1.5M | $0.5M | $0.43M | Sustainability investments and agenda advanced | Strategic leveraging of partnerships with VANOC, the Province of BC and Environmental non-governmental organizations to move sustainability initiatives forward. Continued collaboration with federal government departments and external partners to identify opportunities to showcase innovative approaches to sustainability.Revitalization of the Environment and Sustainability Issue Cluster committee to focus initiatives in three priority areas: footprint reduction, sustainability innovation and education and awareness. | |
Environmental Assessment is integral part of program and policy decision-making. | Efficient and effective environmental assessments | $2.6M | $0.4M | $0.2M | Environmental Assessments Completed | Environmental Assessments Completed Participation in EA follow-up programs. | |
H. Fisheries and Oceans Canada | Healthy and productive aquatic eco-systems. | Habitat management | $0.6M | $0.1M | $0.1M | Environmental assessment work completed | Completed Environment Assessments on the Whistler Nordic Centre. Provided expert Federal Authority advice on 5 projects. Issued 12 Fisheries Act authorizations. |
18. Comments on variances: The CBSA's negative variance as reported above is a result of functions accomplished in 2007–2008 that were originally forecasted for 2006–2007.The funding difference for Fisheries and Oceans for the total allocation reflects lapsed funds in previous years that will not be sought.HRSDC has incorporated the entry of foreign workers into the larger nationwide Foreign Worker Program and therefore will not be seeking funds. |
|||||||
19. Results to be achieved by non–federal partners (if applicable): Activities undertaken by non-federal partners are critical to the success of the Games. Each partner has provided information on the results of its activities on its respective websites. Vancouver Organizing Committee for the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games (http://www.vancouver2010.com/en)Government of British Columbia (http://www.gov.bc.ca/ )City of Vancouver (http://www.city.vancouver.bc.ca/)Resort Municipality of Whistler (http://www.whistler.ca/) Canadian Olympic and Paralympic Committees (http://www.olympic.ca/EN/) |
|||||||
20. Contact information: Tenille Hoogland 613-949-7987 |
Summary of Key Objectives
The Department of Canadian Heritage's Sustainable Development
Strategy (SDS) 2007–2009 focuses on ensuring that the
environmental impacts of its decisions are understood, weighed, and
appropriately addressed. To this end, the first SDS priority is to
institute effective governance structures and management measures,
with a primary objective of strengthening the Department's
sustainable development decision making and monitoring . The SDS
underscores the Department's unique contribution in the area of
sustainable communities, particularly regarding the essential role
of culture. This is reflected in the second SDS priority: to
improve the federal knowledge base about sustainable development
and to increase planning capacity so that it takes into account the
cultural dimension of sustainable communities. Finally, the SDS
advances previous departmental sustainable development strategies
by furthering the ongoing commitment to integrate better
environmental management in program and policy areas as well as in
key operations.
Link to SDS 2007–2009
http://www.pch.gc.ca/pc-ch/publctn/sdd-sds/tdm-eng.cfm
In 2007–2008, the Department strengthened its sustainable development decision making and monitoring. During 2007–2008, the Department has focused on establishing effective governance structures and management measures. Most of planned results for sustainable development (SD) are still in progress as the Department restructures its SD capacity. The Department is also refining its approach and is taking concrete steps toward integrating better environmental management in key operations, program, and policy areas.
SDS Departmental Goal: Priority 1 – To Strengthen decision-making and monitoring at the Department of Canadian Heritage in support of sustainable development. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Federal SD goal, including GGO goals (if applicable) |
Performance measurement from current SDS | SDS departmental expected results for 2007–08 | Achieved SDS departmental results for 2007–08 |
(6) Organizational structures and processes support meaningful and significant SD objectives |
|
An SD Coordinator is expected to be in place by May 2007. |
A business case was developed that recommended locating of an SD function in corporate planning/policy area of the Department. An SD coordinator function has been established in the corporate planning/policy area of the Department. |
|
A first report on SDS 2007–09 is expected to be submitted to a committee of DGs by September 2007, with a second report presented to DGs no later than March 31, 2008. |
The establishment of the mandate and terms of reference for the SD DG Committee is in progress. A governance plan will be developed and presented to the SD Committee along with ongoing reporting on SDS. |
|
|
Progress on the priorities identified in the 2007–08 RPP will be reported in the 2007–08 DPR. | Progress on the priorities identified in the RPP is reported in the 2007–08 DPR. | |
|
By December 2007, managers' performance contracts are expected to include a standardized expression of expectations for managing staff that incorporates SD goals, where appropriate. |
Activities supporting SD have been used as a tool to measure how managers meet their stewardship of resource objectives as described in their performance contracts. In some branches (eServices), SD performance indicators have been integrated into their business and operations plans. |
|
|
By December 2007, it is expected that accounting procedures will be established to collect and report on contracting and procurement data with environmental considerations; a summary of the relevant activity and investments will be prepared for the end of 2007–08 (to be posted on the Department's website by April 2008). | A standard selection criteria is inserted in all RFPs allowing additional points to be allocated to bidders submitting their bids on double-sided recycled paper and confirming that all work provided under the contract will also meet these conditions. | |
|
In the first report to DGs (September 2007), a first assessment of baseline data is expected to be included along with a plan for collecting missing baseline information. |
The parameters for the SDS baseline data collection are being explored. Once the parameters are established, an assessment of baseline data will be undertaken, and a plan for collecting missing baseline data will be established and communicated to the SD Committee. |
|
|
An overview/update of current departmental practices that support SD goals should be circulated to staff by September 2007. |
The overview/update of current departmental practices that support SD goals is currently under development. This overview will be finalized and reported to staff once approved by the SD Committee. |
|
|
A departmental SEA Advisor is expected to be in place by May 2007. |
Owing to other departmental priorities, The Department will continue its service agreement with PWGSC for all matters related to Environmental Assessments (EA). An officer (FI-3 ) within CoE on Gs&Cs has been assigned to coordinate PCH EA initiatives with PWGSC. |
|
SDS Departmental
Goal: Priority 2 – To improve the federal knowledge base about SD and increase planning capacity to account for the social and cultural dimensions of sustainable communities. |
|||
Federal SD goal, including GGO goals (if applicable) |
Performance measurement from current SDS | SDS departmental expected results for 2007–08 | Achieved SDS departmental results for 2007–08 |
(4) Communities enjoy a prosperous economy, a vibrant and equitable society, and a healthy environment for current and future generations |
|
At least one new study on the cultural dimension of sustainable communities is produced for the department and circulated among staff by March 31, 2008. | The parameters for a new study or background paper on the cultural dimensions of sustainable communities will be produced by September 2008. |
|
A research plan is designed and launched by December 2007, to enable the development of a list of indicators or data tools by 2009. |
Preparations for the research plan are underway. Currently, preparations are underway to enable the development of a list of sustainable development indicators by 2009. |
|
|
By March 31, 2008, a resource guide to be prepared for sharing with federal policy analysts. It will highlight key information and data from currently known sources, addressing the social and cultural aspects of sustainable communities. | Preparations for the resource guide are currently underway. | |
|
By the end of 2007–08, Canadian Heritage will have supported at least two internal and at least two external (that is, other federal departments and/or other government or non-government partners) discussions to advance understanding of the role of culture in sustainable communities. | The Department has played a key policy role in the Interdepartmental Federal Family Initiative and has developed a policy model for place-based approaches to community and cultural sustainability. | |
SDS Departmental
Goal: Priority 3 – To integrate better environmental management in departmental policies, programs and operations. |
|||
Federal SD goal, including GGO
goals (if applicable) |
Performance measurement from current SDS | SDS departmental expected results for 2007–08 | Achieved SDS departmental results for 2007–08 |
(1) Clean and secure water for people, marine and freshwater ecosystems. |
|
By March 31, 2008, at least 4 departmental units to be in contact with the SEA Advisor. | Four departmental units are in regular contact with PWGSC regional EA Advisors: Cultural Space Canada, Official Language, Sports and Vancouver 2010. |
(2) Clean air for people to breathe and ecosystems to function well. |
|
By March 31, 2008, at least one Strategic Environmental Assessment is expected to be completed or underway for a new policy, plan or program. | There has been no SEA completed in 2007–08 because the departmental SEA advisor position was not filled. As part of the Service Agreement with PWGSC, The Department anticipates completing at least one SEA in 2008–09. |
(3) Reduce greenhouse gas emissions. |
|
The CCI facilities management plan will identify the type of baseline data required, and the responsibilities for developing and monitoring SDS targets. | The CCI service agreement with PWGSC for the provision of facilities management services will include the collection of baseline data for developing and monitoring SDS targets. |
SDS Departmental
Goal: Priority 3 – To integrate better environmental management in departmental policies, programs and operations. |
|||
Federal SD goal, including GGO
goals (if applicable) |
Performance measurement from current SDS | SDS departmental expected results for 2007–08 | Achieved SDS departmental results for 2007–08 |
(5) Sustainable development and use
of natural resources. (3) Reduce greenhouse gas emissions. |
|
For 2007–08, an assessment is expected to be made of the current paper use within the department and targets will be identified for reducing usage. | An analysis was completed and revealed that recycled paper is used in approximately 90% of areas. A plan is underway to target the remaining 10%. |
|
For 2007–08, an assessment is expected to be made of the extent of meetings and training sessions that are conducted in the Department, involving participants from multiple locations and including those occasions where travel is involved. A strategy will be developed for expanding the use of technology assistance, where appropriate, and targets will be established for the following year. | All PCH space that accommodates its members
includes meeting rooms. Also established is a new Learning and Conference Centre at Les Terrasses de la Chaudière at PCH NHQ. This centre is a high-tech, multi-functional room, capable of serving 54 persons as is or when divided in two, 33 persons in one room and 21 in the other. It is fully equipped with 32 personal computers to support in-house IM/IT training. Its videoconferencing capability permits remote training and information sessions. |
|
|
At least 80% of all new building upgrades in 2007–08 over which Canadian Heritage has control to integrate environmentally-friendly and/or low emissions equipment or accessories. | 100% achieved, largely due to Green Procurement
initiatives Upgrades (such as office fit-ups requiring furniture etc.) are done according to fit-up standards which are planned to respect an integrated design approach and sustainable design principles. For example finish materials are chosen for their "green" characteristics as well as their performance, durability, recyclability, low embodied energy and low toxicity. |
|
|
By March 31, 2008, the department will increase its acquisition of ethanol-blended fuel. | In 2007–08 completed the conversion of PCH vehicles to hybrid. | |
|
By March 31, 2008, the department will prepare its first annual report, in consultation with PWGSC, on the GHG emissions of its building spaces (excluding CCI) and the processes for further reducing those emissions. (This report may be combined with the SDS report to be submitted to DGs by March 31, 2008) | Consultation with PWGSC was initiated for the creation of an Annual Report on the per cent reduction in GHG emissions across the department's building and accommodation inventory. Discussions remain underway. | |
SDS Departmental
Goal: Priority 3 – To integrate better environmental management in departmental policies, programs and operations. |
|||
Federal SD goal, including GGO
goals (if applicable) |
Performance measurement from current SDS | SDS departmental expected results for 2007–08 | Achieved SDS departmental results for 2007–08 |
(6) Organizational structures and processes support meaningful and significant SD objectives |
|
A baseline of instances of environmentally friendly clauses or stipulations in procurement documents is expected to be established by March 2008 for future comparisons. | An environmental clause is now generated automatically in procurement documents. |
|
A baseline will be established for collecting data. | An entry field was inserted into SAP for Administrative Officers to record green procurement transactions. | |
|
The SDS report to DGs, due by March 2008, to include an account of the percentage of the procurement community trained in green procurement. | Training course for new SAP users discusses the requirement to consider environmentally friendly products when purchasing goods. | |
(1) Clean and secure water for people, marine
and freshwater ecosystems. (2) Clean air for people to breathe and ecosystems to function well. (3) Reduce greenhouse gas emissions. |
|
In 2007–08, at least 2 significant communications initiatives to raise awareness among PHC staff about SDS 2007–09 actions | In setting up its SD capacity, the Department is working with its environmental working group to plan communications initiatives for 2008–09). |
(4) Communities enjoy a prosperous economy, a vibrant and equitable society, and a healthy environment for current and future generations (5) Sustainable development and use of natural resources. (6) Organizational structures and processes support meaningful and significant |
|
In 2007–08, at least 2 communications initiatives will raise awareness among staff about commuting alternatives. | In setting up its SD capacity, the Department is coordinating communications initiatives with its volunteer group to raise awareness among staff. |
|
The number of Canadian Heritage employees participating in the ECOPass Program is expected to increase by at least 5%. | In setting up its SD capacity, baseline information will be collected for 2008–09 to determine the percentage increase of participation. | |
|
A baseline of commuting practices by PHC staff will be established by March 2008, for comparative assessments and setting future targets s. | In setting up its SD capacity, the Department is ensuring that the parameters required to establish this baseline will be set. |
1 - Response to Parliamentary Committees
Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Official Languages,Communities speak out: Hear our voice. The Vitality of Official Language Minority Communities
The report, containing 39 recommendations, was tabled in the House of Commons on May 9, 2007.
The Committee initiated this study on the vitality of official-language minority communities in October 2006 and focused primarily on health and immigration issues. The Committee members travelled to Vancouver, Edmonton, Regina, Winnipeg, Toronto, Sudbury, Sherbrooke, Moncton, and St. John to hear from regional organizations. The study had three main objectives: to assess the results of the Action Plan for Official Languages, to speak to the Government on behalf of the communities concerning the next Plan, and to initiate a rapprochement of the communities for the success of new initiatives beginning in 2008. The recommendations concern health, immigration, and all of the issues that affect community development, including education, support for community organizations, infrastructure development, language clauses in agreements, justice, research, arts and culture, and economic development. Finally, the Committee recommended that the government create a high-level committee responsible for implementing the second phase of the Action Plan and that it adopt a comprehensive renewal approach.
The Government Response was signed by the Minister of Canadian Heritage, Status of Women, and Official Languages and tabled in the House of Commons on October 17, 2007.
http://cmte.parl.gc.ca/cmte/CommitteePublication.aspx?COM=10472&SourceId=214800&SwitchLanguage=1
Eighteenth Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women,The Impacts of Funding and Program Changes at Status of Women Canada
The report, containing five recommendations, was tabled in the House of Commons on May 2, 2007.
The Committee decided to study the impact of changes announced within Status of Women Canada in September 2006. From December 2006 to February 2007, the Committee members heard testimony and received a large number of submissions from individuals and organizations representing all regions of Canada, national and local groups, and some groups that receive the bulk of their funding from the Women's Program. The five report recommendations reflect the majority of the points of view expressed to the Committee. These involved asking Status of Women Canada to reconsider regional office closures, the abolition of the Research Fund, the promotion of equality in the wording of the revised mandate, and the terms and conditions of the Women's Program.
The Government Response was signed by the Minister of Canadian Heritage, Status of Women, and Official Languages, and tabled in the House of Commons on October 17, 2007.
http://cmte.parl.gc.ca/cmte/CommitteePublication.aspx?COM=10477&SourceId=215392&SwitchLanguage=1
Seventeenth Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage,The funding crisis of the Canadian Television Fund
The report, containing six recommendations, was tabled in the House of Commons on March 21, 2007.
Further to the January 2007 decision of Shaw Communications Inc. and Québécor Média to withdraw their financial support for the Canadian Television Fund (CTF), the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage launched a study of the issue. The Committee members heard testimony from the Minister of Canadian Heritage, and from representatives of the CTF, CBC/Radio-Canada, the CRTC, Shaw Communications, and Québécor Média, as well as from numerous representatives from the film and television industry and related professional associations. The Committee's recommendations support the work of the CTF and condemns the actions of Shaw Communications and Québécor Média. It recommended that the CRTC amend the Broadcasting Distribution Regulations to require payments to the CTF, that some provisions concerning the CTF be maintained, and that annual contributions to the CTF be established. It criticized the fact that the CRTC held its hearings into the future of the CTF in private.
The Government Response was signed by the Minister of Canadian Heritage, Status of Women, and Official Languages, and was tabled in the House of Commons on June 14, 2007.
http://cmte.parl.gc.ca/cmte/CommitteePublication.aspx?COM=10467&SourceId=212907&SwitchLanguage=1
Eighth report of the Standing Senate Committee on Official Languages, Relocation of Head Offices of Federal Institutions: Respect for Language Rights
The report, containing ten recommendations, was tabled in the Senate on May 16, 2007.
Following the relocation of some federal institutions' head offices, the Standing Senate Committee on Official Languages decided to conduct a study on the impact of these decisions on the application of the Official Languages Act. During its study, the Committee met with the Canadian Tourism Commission, which moved its head office from Ottawa to Vancouver in 2005; with Farm Credit Canada, which moved its head office to Regina in 1992; and with Veterans Affairs Canada, which relocated its head office to Charlottetown in the early 1980s. The issues specifically involved communications with and services to the public, employees' language of work, the vitality of official language communities in a minority setting, and the promotion of linguistic duality. The Committee's recommendations identify the most effective and efficient means through which the government can ensure full respect of the rights provided in the Official Languages Act when relocating the head office of federal agencies from a bilingual region to a unilingual region.
The Government Response was signed jointly by the Minister of Canadian Heritage, Status of Women, and Official Languages and the President of the Treasury Board, and was tabled in the Senate on October 28, 2007.
Second (Interim) Report of the Standing Senate Committee on Official Languages, Understanding the Reality and Meeting the Challenges of Living in French in Nova Scotia—Fact-Finding Mission to the Acadian and Francophone Communities of Nova Scotia
The report, containing ten recommendations, was tabled in the Senate on October 5, 2006.
This report came further to a fact-finding mission to the Acadian and Francophone communities of Nova Scotia from September 19 to 23, 2005. It describes the issues raised by the communities during these consultations and points out three specific factors that contributed to halting the development of these communities: a demographic and historic factor, a political factor, and a factor related to the public administrative process. The Committee's recommendations call for the federal government's compliance with the Action Plan and Part VII of the Official Languages Act. It alsoencourages partnerships with the Nova Scotia minority communities, support for their development, the signing of a cooperation agreement as soon as possible, and a review of the Official Languages Regulations.
The Government Response was signed by the Minister of Canadian Heritage, Status of Women, and Official Languages, and the President of the Treasury Board, and was tabled in the Senate on June 20, 2007.
Fifth Report of the Standing Senate Committee on Official Languages, Reflecting Canada's Linguistic Duality at the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games: A Golden Opportunity
The report, containing ten recommendations, was tabled in the Senate on March 1, 2007.
This study began with the testimony of Lise Bissonnette, Grand Témoin for the 2006 Turin Olympic Games. Subsequently, the Committee heard from some 40 witnesses, including partners in the organization of the Games, British Columbia Francophone groups, and Canadian Heritage and Sport Canada. The report recommends clarifying the roles of the Vancouver Organizing Committee for the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games (VANOC), the Canadian Foundation for Cross-Cultural Dialogue, the Fédération des francophones de Colombie-Britannique, and the Government of Quebec. It also recommends the appointment of a representative from the Francophone communities to the VANOC Board of Directors and for the collaboration of the federal government and VANOC with the Bell Globemedia/Rogers Media consortium to find a solution that will guarantee equitable access (as in equal quality) to 2010 Olympic Games programming for all Canadians. The Committee agreed, early in its activities, to examine the progress made by the partners in the organization of the Games, and intends to continue doing so. It is firmly determined to reconvene the partners within three years to determine the status of their commitment and progress made in the promotion of linguistic duality.
The Government Response was signed by the Minister of Canadian Heritage, Status of Women, and Official Languages and the Minister for the Pacific Gateway and the Vancouver-Whistler Olympics, and was tabled in the Senate on August 18, 2007.
2 - Response to the Auditor General (including to the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development)
Name of audit: Use of Public Funds by the Former Lieutenant-Governor of Quebec
This audit found that, of the more than $1.7 million paid to the former Lieutenant-Governor of Quebec between April 1, 1997 and March 31, 2007, approximately $1 million was spent on official duties. The audit was unable to determine whether the remainder, approximately $700,000, was spent on official duties. The audit recommended that the Department of Canadian Heritage initiate discussions with the former Lieutenant-Governor of Quebec to identify expenses that were ineligible for the grant and which should be reimbursed to the Department. It also recommended that the Department review the conditions for grant eligibility; establish, with the directors of the offices of Lieutenant-Governors, the policies that governing personal spending and expenses incurred as part of the duties of a Lieutenant-Governor; update the Lieutenant-Governor Briefing Book, adding a section on financial management and tax treatment of grants, and provide copies to Lieutenant-Governors; provide their staff with training on this topic; and ensure that Lieutenant-Governors publicly and promptly account for the use of the public funds.
The Auditor General tabled this audit on June 12, 2007.
Since the audit was tabled, the Department has worked closely with the offices of Lieutenant-Governors to address these recommendations. Clearer guidelines regarding eligible expenses that may be covered by the named grant were developed. These are now included in the Minister's letter approving the payment of the grant at the beginning of the fiscal year. They are also included in the newly revised Lieutenant Governor Briefing Book. In addition, the tax treatment of the grant has been clearly outlined in the Briefing Book in collaboration with the Canada Revenue Agency whose representatives have also made themselves available to the Department and to Lieutenant-Governors offices for ongoing consultation.
The Department continues to examine various ways to enhance the accountability of Lieutenant-Governors for the federal funding that they receive. In this sense, the Department has already taken steps such as a more rigorous application of the federal Policy on Transfer Payments and continued communication with the offices of Lieutenant-Governors.
Finally, the Department is awaiting for the results of the RCMP investigation to determine whether other measures may be required.
For more information on the department's response, please visit the link below.
http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/docs/200706Lieutenant-Governorqce.pdf
3 - External Audits (Note: These refer to other external audits conducted by the Public Service Commission of Canada or the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages)
Name of audit: Audit of the Movement of Public Servants between the Public Service and Ministers' Offices by the Public Service Commission
The Objective of this audit was to determine the extent of movement of public servants between the public service and ministers' offices; determine whether appointments of public servants returning from ministers' offices met the staffing requirements of the Public Service Employment Act (PSEA), the Public Service Employment Regulations (PSER), PSC policies and other applicable legislation; and assess the risk to political impartiality.
The audit looked at 15 organizations, including the Department of Canadian Heritage, and covered the period from 1990 to 2006. It did not mention the Department specifically and included only one recommendation, which was directed to the Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS). The recommendation proposes that TBS develop and recommend to the Treasury Board a policy governing the movement of public servants between the public service and Ministers' Offices to ensure that these moves are undertaken in a fair and transparent manner, upholding the principle of political impartiality, and are effectively monitored.
For more information, please visit the link below.
http://www.psc-cfp.gc.ca/adt-vrf/rprt/2007/mbmo-mecm/index-eng.htm
1. Name of Internal Audit |
2. Audit Type |
3. Status |
4. Actual Completion Date |
5. Electronic Link to Report |
Internal Audit of Canada’s Participation in the 2005 Aichi, Japan World Exposition (Expo 2005) |
Internal Audit |
Completed |
May 4, 2007 |
http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/assurnc/2007/2007-02/index-eng.cfm |
Audit of the Vancouver Organizing Committee (VANOC) for the 2010 Olympic and Paralympics Winter Games Contributions Agreements |
Internal Audit |
Completed |
October 19, 2007 |
http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/assurnc/2007/2007-03/index-eng.cfm |
Audit of Interchange Canada Program |
Audit / TPP |
Completed |
February 8, 2008 |
http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/assurnc/2007/2007-01/index-eng.cfm |
6. Electronic link to internal audit plan: Table 12 of RPP 2007-08 |
1. Name of Evaluation | 2. Evaluation Type | 3. Actual Completion Date | 4. Electronic Link to Report |
---|---|---|---|
Summative Evaluation of the National Arts Training Contribution Program (Program Activity 1) |
Summative Evaluation / TPP | May 4, 2007 | http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/evaltn/2007/2007-03/index-eng.cfm |
Summative Evaluation of the TV5 Program (Program Activity 2) |
Summative Evaluation / TPP | May 4, 2007 | http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/evaltn/2007/2007-03/index-eng.cfm |
Summative Evaluation of Canada's Participation in the 2005 Aichi, Japan World Exposition (Expo 2005) (Program Activity 4) |
Summative Evaluation | May 4, 2007 | http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/evaltn/2007/2007-02/index-eng.cfm |
Summative Evaluation of the Canada Music Fund (Program Activity 2) |
Summative Evaluation /TPP | October 19, 2007 | http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/evaltn/2007/2007-04/index-eng.cfm |
Summative Evaluation of the Celebration, Commemoration and Learning Program (Program Activity 5) |
Summative Evaluation /TPP | October 19, 2007 | http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/evaltn/2007/2007-05/index-eng.cfm |
Summative Evaluation of the National Training Program in the Film and Video Sector (Program Activity 2) |
Summative Evaluation | February 8, 2008 | http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/em-cr/evaltn/2008/2008-01/index-eng.cfm |
5. Electronic link to evaluation plan: Table 12 of RPP 2007-08 http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/rpp/0708/pch/pch04-eng.asp |