Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Symbol of the Government of Canada

ARCHIVED - Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission Canada


Warning This page has been archived.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.

Table 4-A: User Fees Act ($ thousands)


2007–2008
A. User Fee Fee Type Fee-Setting Authority Date Last Modified
Confidential business information exemption fees Regulatory (R) Hazardous Materials Information Review Act June 2002


2007–2008
Forecast Revenue ($000) Actual Revenue ($000) Full Cost ($000) Performance Standard Performance Results
570 570 713 Complete pre-registration check and register claims within seven days of receipt, provided all necessary information is included. 100%


Planning Years
Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue ($000) Estimated Full Cost ($000)
2008–09 570 713(1)
2009–10 570 713(1)
2010–11 570 713(1)


B. Date Last Modified
N/A


C. Other Information
(1) Based on 20/80 ratio utilized for differentiation between private good and public good activities as per the revised fee schedule.
Notes
Fees have been established as per the Government of Canada's External Charging Policy of 1997.


2007–2008
User Fee Fee Type Fee-Setting Authority Date Last Modified
Appeal Fee Regulatory (R) Hazardous Materials Information Review Act June 2002


2007–2008
Forecast Revenue ($000) Actual Revenue ($000) Full Cost ($000) Performance Standard Performance Results
- 2 2 Number of appeals/ decisions 0


Planning Years
Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue ($000) Estimated Full Cost ($000)
2008–09 - -
2009–10 - -
2010–11 - -


B. Date Last Modified
N/A
Notes
Fees have been established as per the Government of Canada's External Charging Policy of 1997.

Table 4-A:  User Fees Act ($ thousands)


2007–2008
A. User Fee Fee Type Fee-Setting Authority Date Last Modified
Fees charged for processing of access requested filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA) Other Products and Services (O) Access to Information Act 1992


2007–2008
Forecast Revenue ($000) Actual Revenue ($000) Full Cost ($000) Performance Standard Performance Results
-(2) -(2) 1 Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request 100%


Planning Years
Fiscal Year Forecast Revenue ($000) Estimated Full Cost ($000)
2008–09 -(2) -
2009–10 -(2) -
2010–11 -(2) -


B. Date Last Modified
N/A


C. Other Information
(2) The financial information is being reported in millions of dollars. The actual and forecast revenues are below the chosen denomination.
Notes
Fees have been established as per the Government of Canada's External Charging Policy of 1997.

Table 4-B: Policy on Service Standards for External Fees


A. External Fee Service Standard1 Performance Results2 Stakeholder Consultation
Confidential business information exemption fees Complete pre-registration check and register claims within seven days of receipt, provided all necessary information is included. The performance result was 100% achieved. Of the total 332 claims received, the 322 which included all necessary information were verified and registered within seven days or less. HMIRC's service standard was established in the course of the fee structure review in 2001. At that time, HMIRC consulted with all of its active claimants as well as with its Council of Governors representing federal, provincial and territorial governments, industry and labour. The Commission received full buy-in from all stakeholders.

(1) As established pursuant to the Policy on Service Standards for External Fees:
  • service standards may not have received parliamentary review; and
  • service standards may not respect all performance standard establishment requirements under the UFA (e.g. international comparison; independent complaint address).
(2) Performance results are not legally subject to section 5.1 of the UFA regarding fee reductions for unachieved performance.