This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
Supplementary Information (Tables)
Strategic Outcome: Incomes are secure for RCMP members and their survivors affected by disability or death
Program Activity: Statutory Payments
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Grant to compensate members of the RCMP for injuries received in the performance of duty.
Start date: July 8, 1959
End date: Ongoing
Description: This program significantly contributes to the higher level expected results of the organization’s mandate in that it protects members of the organization in a real way in the event they become disabled as a result of carrying out the duties and activities associated with endeavouring to ensure a safe and secure Canada. This program provides both financial and health care assistance to members of the RCMP who die or suffer a permanent work-related illness or injury leading to a loss of quality of life.
Expected results: Eligible clients are appropriately compensated for the non-economic effects of a service-related illness/injury and/or death.
Forecast Spending 2010–11 |
Planned Spending 2011–12 |
Planned Spending 2012–13 |
Planned Spending 2013–14 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Total grants | 96.7 | 100.9 | 109.6 | 118.7 |
Total contributions | ||||
Total other types of transfer payments | ||||
Total transfer payments | 96.7 | 100.9 | 109.6 | 118.7 |
Summary of the 3 Year Plan: Payments are expected to increase based on the annual forecast provided by Veteran’s Affairs.
Strategic Outcome: Incomes are secure for RCMP members and their survivors affected by disability or death
Program Activity: Statutory Payments
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Pensions under the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Pension Continuation Act (PCA)
Start date: 1959
End date: Ongoing so long as there are remaining plan members and survivors.
Description: The PCA is a defined benefit pension plan whose purpose is to provide a lifetime benefit for RCMP members and their survivors. It provides for the payment of pensions to Officers, Non-Commissioned officers and Constables engaged prior to March 1, 1949, except those who elected to come under the RCMP Superannuation Act. The PCA is predecessor to this Act.
Expected results: To provide a pension benefit for life to eligible RCMP pensioners and survivors.
Forecast Spending 2010–11 |
Planned Spending 2011–12 |
Planned Spending 2012–13 |
Planned Spending 2013–14 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Total grants | ||||
Total contributions | ||||
Total other types of transfer payments | 19.0 | 17.5 | 17.5 | 17.5 |
Total transfer payments | 19.0 | 17.5 | 17.5 | 17.5 |
Summary of the 3 Year Plan: Payments are expected to stay the same or decrease over the next three years as the number of eligible recipients will decline.
Strategic Outcome: Criminal activity affecting Canadians is reduced
Program Activity: Canadian Law Enforcement Services
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Firearms Licensing and Support Infrastructure
Start date: 1995-1996
End date: Ongoing
Description: Annual funding to participating provinces and/or territories for the reimbursement of costs incurred in the administration of the Firearms Program within their jurisdiction.
Expected results:
Forecast Spending 2010–11 |
Planned Spending 2011–12 |
Planned Spending 2012–13 |
Planned Spending 2013–14 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Total grants | ||||
Total contributions | 15.8 | 15.8 | 15.8 | 15.8 |
Total other types of transfer payments | ||||
Total transfer payments | 15.8 | 15.8 | 15.8 | 15.8 |
Summary of the 3 Year Plan: The terms and conditions for this program were renewed in 2010 and contribution agreements will be signed with "opt-in" provinces for the period between 2011 and 2016.
The GGO supplementary table applies to departments and agencies bound by the Federal Sustainable Development Act, the Policy on Green Procurement, or the Policy Framework for Offsetting Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Major International Events.
Please note:
Targets / Strategies / Comments
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR |
---|---|---|
Target Status | ||
Dollar value of purchases against green consolidated procurement instruments for laptop computers, desktop computers and network printers relative to total dollar value of all purchases for laptop computers, desktop computers and network printers in the baseline year selected. (FY 2010-2011) | 85% | |
Progress against measure in the given fiscal year. |
Strategies / Comments
Other Reporting Considerations:
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR |
---|---|---|
Target Status | ||
Dollar value of purchases for hybrid and/or lowest fuel efficient in class administrative vehicles relative to total dollar value of all purchases of administrative vehicles in the baseline year selected (FY 2010–2012) | 75% | |
Progress against measure in the given fiscal year. |
Strategies / Comments
Other Reporting Considerations:
Performance Measure | RPP | DPR |
---|---|---|
Target Status | ||
Number of procurement and materiel management staff with formal green procurement training relative to total number of procurement and materiel management staff | 95% | |
Progress against measure in the given fiscal year. |
Strategies / Comments
Other Reporting Considerations:
Name of Horizontal Initiative: Games Security and Public Safety (GS&PS) for the Vancouver 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Games
Name of lead department(s): The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) led a multi-organizational, Integrated Security Group known as the Vancouver 2010 Integrated Security Unit (V2010 ISU). The Departments and Agencies that formed the V2010 ISU were: Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC), Department of National Defence (DND), Health Canada (HC), Industry Canada (IC), Privy Council Office (PCO), Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), Public Safety Canada (PS) and Transport Canada (TC).
Lead department program activity: Protective Policing Services
Start date of the Horizontal Initiative: 2004-2005
End date of the Horizontal Initiative: 2010-2011
Total federal funding allocation (start to end date): Approximately $900M
Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement):
As the lead agency responsible for the development and delivery of the 2010 Winter Games security, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) led a multi-organizational, Integrated Security Groups known as the Vancouver 2010 Integrated Security Unit (V2010 ISU) which had the overall responsibility for coordinating and providing security for the 2010 Winter Olympic Games.
The participating Departments and Agencies worked closely together, using a four-phased approach to major event planning: design and planning; a robust exercise and testing stage leading to a declaration of operational readiness; Games operation; and demobilization/debrief.
The overall goal of the V2010 ISU was to provide a “safe and secure game” for the athletes, officials and visitors. This was accomplished through and integrated security model and in close collaboration with partners, including all levels of government, Vancouver 2010 Organizing Committee (VANOC) and private corporations.
The total budget for the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Games is estimated at $900 million, in which the Province of British Columbia cost-shares a portion through a 2010 Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Security Cost Sharing Memorandum of Agreement.
Shared outcomes:
a. Safe and Secure Games
b. Effective Policing in Games Security area and Urban Domain
c. Effective Land Security
d. Effective Air Security
e. Effective Marine Security
f. Effective Intelligence
g. Effective Border Integrity
h. Effective Operational Support
i. Effective Information Technology
Governance structures:
The Games Security and Public Safety Group has completed a security Results-based Management Accountability Framework (RMAF) as required by the Treasury Board Secretariat. The RMAF formalizes the federal commitment of the RCMP and its federal partners to be accountable for the implementation of this initiative.
The RMAF describes the roles and responsibilities of Key Federal Departments and Agencies participating in this horizontal initiative, as well as its goals and objectives, its related components and expected results and a coordinated performance measurement and evaluation plan.
The Commissioner of the RCMP reports to the Minister of Public Safety Canada. The participating departments/agencies have a working relationship with the RCMP and report to their respective Ministers.
The Deputy Ministers Working Group is chaired by the Coordinator for 2010 Olympics and G8 and G20 Security. This working group is comprised of the respective Security Departments and Agencies participating as members in order to facilitate an integrated federal approach to security.
Planning Highlights:
N/A
Federal Partner Program Activity (PA) |
Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | Planned Spending for 2011–12 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | Risk Assessment | $5.311 | $0 |
PA2 | Enforcement | $1.095 | $0 |
PA3 | Facilitated Border | $3.780 | $0 |
PA4 | Conventional Border | $2.134 | $0 |
PA5 | Trade | $0.184 | $0 |
PA6 | Recourse | $0 | |
PA5 | Internal Services | $3.296 | $0 |
Total | $15.8 | $0 |
Expected results by program:
a. Safe and Secure Games: Finalize/implement plans, processes and policies. Deliver training and perform accreditation screening. Operational Readiness.
g. Effective Border Integrity
Federal Partner: CIC
($ millions)
Federal Partner Program Activity | Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | Total Planned Spending for All Federal Partners for 2011–12 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | a) Selection and processing of temporary residents |
$ 5.1 Incremental funding $ 2.1 Foregone revenue |
$0 |
Total | $0 |
Expected results by program:
a. Safe and Secure Games
g. Effective Border Integrity
Federal Partner: CSIS
($ millions)
Federal Partner Program Activity | Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | Total Planned Spending for All Federal Partners for 2011–12 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | a) Intelligence Program | $11 | |
b) Security Screening Program | |||
Total |
Expected results by program:
a) Safe and Secure Games
f) Effective Intelligence
h) Effective Operational Support
i) Effective Information Technology
Federal Partner: DND
($ millions)
Federal Partner Program Activity | Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | Total Planned Spending for All Federal Partners for 2011–12 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | a) Conduct Operations |
$ 231.1 ($212 + $19.1 |
$0 |
Total | $ 231.1 | $0 |
Expected results by program:
a) Safe and Secure Games
c) Effective Land Security
d) Effective Air Security
e) Effective Marine Security
f) Effective Intelligence
h) Effective operational Support
i) Effective Information Technology
Federal Partner: HC
($ millions)
Federal Partner Program Activity | Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | Total Planned Spending for All Federal Partners for 2011–12 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | Sustainable Environmental health |
$1.196 |
$0 |
Total | $1.196 | $0 |
Expected results by program:
a) Safe and Secure Games
b) Effective Policing in Games Security Area and Urban Domain
h) Effective Operational Support
Federal Partner: IC
($ millions)
Federal Partner Program Activity | Names of Programs for Federal Partners |
Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | Total Planned Spending for All Federal Partners for 2011–12 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | Provide access to the radio frequency spectrum |
$9.8 | $0 |
PA2 | Minimize the impact of interference to radio communications systems |
$0 | |
Total | $9.8 | $0 |
Expected results by program:
a) Safe and Secure Games
h) Effective Operational Support
i) Effective Information Technology
Federal Partner: PHAC
($ millions)
Federal Partner Program Activity | Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | Total Planned Spending for All Federal Partners for 2011–12 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | Emergency Preparedness and Response |
$0.9 | $0 |
Total | $0.9 | $0 |
Expected results by program:
a) Safe and Secure Games
f) Effective Intelligence
h) Effective Operational Support
i) Effective Information Technology
Federal Partner: PS
($ millions)
Federal Partner Program Activity | Names of Programs for Federal Partners |
Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | Total Planned Spending for All Federal Partners for 2011–12 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | Emergency Management and National Security |
$1.2 | $0 |
Communications | $0 | ||
Law Enforcement and Policing |
$0 | ||
Total | $1.2 | $0 |
Expected results by program:
a) Safe and Secure Games
h) Effective Operational Support
Federal Partner: RCMP
($ millions)
Federal Partner Program Activity | Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | Total Planned Spending for All Federal Partners for 2011–12 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | Protective Policing Services |
$558 | $0 |
Total | $558 | $0 |
Expected results by program:
a) Safe and Secure Games
h) Effective Operational Support
Federal Partner: RCMP
($ millions)
Federal Partner Program Activity | Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | Total Planned Spending for All Federal Partners for 2011–12 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | Protective Policing Services |
$558 | $0 |
Total | $558 | $0 |
Expected results by program:
a) Safe and Secure Games
b) Effective Policing in Games Security Area and Urban Domain
d) Effective Air Security
e) Effective Marine Security
f) Effective Intelligence
g) Effective Border Integrity
h) Effective Operational Support
i) Effective Information Technology
Federal Partner: TC
($ millions)
Federal Partner Program Activity | Names of Programs for Federal Partners |
Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) |
Total Planned Spending for All Federal Partners for 2011–12 |
---|---|---|---|
PA1 | A safe transportation system |
$ 8.3 NAV Canada 08/09 - $6.6 09/10 - $17.9 10/11 - $0.250 *numbers were re-profiled |
$0 |
PA2 | A secure transportation system |
$0 | |
Total | $0 |
Expected results by program:
a) Safe and Secure Game
b) Effective policing in games security area and Urban Domain
d) Effective Air Security
e) Effective Marine Security
f) Effective Intelligence
g) Effective Border Integrity
h) Effective Operational Support
i) Effective Information Technology
Results to be achieved by non–federal partners (if applicable): N/A
Contact information:
Inspector Jane MacLatchy
Federal Security Coordinator, Vancouver 2010
Protective Policing, Major Events
Royal Canadian Mounted Police
(613) 949-2120
Name of Horizontal Initiative: Integrated Border Enforcement Teams (IBET)
Name of lead department(s): Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Lead department program activity: Federal & International Operations
Start date of the Horizontal Initiative: May 2002
End date of the Horizontal Initiative: Not applicable
Total federal funding allocation (start to end date): Ongoing
Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement):
The mandate of Integrated Border Enforcement Teams (IBETs) is to enhance border integrity between Canada and the United States by identifying, investigating, and interdicting persons and organizations that pose a threat to national security or are engaged in other organized criminal activity.
Shared outcomes:
There will be enhanced border security coverage and improved international relationships along the shared border, as a result of focusing on improving information-sharing between Canadian and US law enforcement agencies and conducting intelligence-led investigations. Border-related investigations, based on intelligence from all IBET partners, will be more effective, rather than random enforcement activity. Law enforcement interoperability will improve with the development of a technically successful communications system linking multi-agencies that will facilitate joint operations, while addressing health and safety concerns for law enforcement officers along the 49th parallel.
Governance structures: International Joint Management Team (IJMT), regional Joint Management Teams (JMT), National Coordination Team (NCT).
Planning Highlights:
Federal Partner Program Activity (PA) |
Names of Programs for Federal Partners |
Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) |
Planned Spending for 2011–12 |
Expected Results for 2010–11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Royal Canadian Mounted Police | IBET | See Link 1 | ||
IBET | See Link 2 | |||
IBET | See Link 3 | |||
Total |
Expected Results:
Link 1: Approval of Shiprider legislation and the running of one co-location pilot project for IBET.
Link 2: Continued engagement with both US and Canadian governements to promote the IBET program and secure additional support and funding for IBET Initiatives.
Link 3: Creation of a reporting mechanism to allow consistent reporting to government on IBET success.
($ millions)
Total Allocation For All Federal Partners (from Start to End Date) | Total Planned Spending for All Federal Partners for 2011–12 |
---|---|
$229.541 | $26.529 |
Results to be achieved by non–federal partners (if applicable):
The IBET core partners include US Customs Border Protection/Border Patrol, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, US Coast Guard. The IBET program contributes significantly to their objective to enhance border integrity between Canada and the United States by identifying, investigating and interdicting persons and organizations that pose a threat to national security or are engaged in other organized criminal activity.
Contact information:
Supt. Warren Coons, Director, IBET
Name of Horizontal Initiative: Investments to Combat the Criminal Use of Firearms (ICCUF)
Name of lead department(s): Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP)
Lead department program activity: Canadian Firearms Program
Start date of the Horizontal Initiative: May 2004
End date of the Horizontal Initiative: Ongoing
Total federal funding allocation (start to end date): Originally $49.9 million over 5 years, now extended indefinitely (see Total Allocation).
Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement):
The overall aim of the ICCUF is to improve the national collection, analysis and sharing of firearms-related intelligence and information. Funding is distributed within the RCMP to the Canadian Firearms Program (CFP), Criminal Intelligence (CI) and the Criminal Intelligence Service Canada (CISC). The initiative also provides funds to Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) and Public Safety Canada (PSC).
The ICCUF directly supports the Government’s objective to tackle violent crime (especially firearms-related offences in relation to organized crime and street gangs), as outlined in the 2008 Speech from the Throne.
Shared outcome(s): Enhance the RCMP and CBSA’s capacity to gather, analyze and share criminal intelligence in order to improve individual investigations, and to increase knowledge of the extent and patterns of smuggling and trafficking of firearms used in crime. These will support the development of an intelligence-led national enforcement strategy.
Governance structure(s): A Joint Management Team (JMT) coordinates ICCUF efforts. Partners will be heavily involved in JMT meetings.
Planning Highlights:
Public safety in Canada continues to be threatened by the criminal use of firearms, many of which are smuggled into the country or otherwise illegally obtained. Analysis of trafficking patterns is improving as more information is collected from the field.
Law enforcement will be directly supported with high quality technical and investigative services and expertise from the CFP and its ICCUF partners in the investigation and prevention of firearms related crimes. There will be a focus on analysis and sharing of firearms related intelligence and information on smuggling and trafficking patterns.
Expected Results: Provide independent policy advice to the Minister of Public Safety on firearms and crime and support research on the relationship between crime guns, street gangs, youth and organized crime.
Federal Partner Program Activity (PA) |
Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | Planned Spending for 2011–12 |
---|---|---|---|
Royal Canadian Mounted Police | Canadian Firearms Program | Ongoing | $7.7* |
Criminal Intelligence Program | Ongoing | $1.12 | |
Total | $8.82 |
*Note: As a result of restructuring within the RCMP, a portion of planned spending for 2011-2012 will be held by a separate unit/directorate (RCMP Laboratory for the Canadian Integrated Ballistics Information Network).
Expected Results: Reduce the impact of organized crime through continued support to law enforcement agencies by providing specialized assistance to effectively investigate, gather evidence and share criminal intelligence to successfully prosecute individuals involved in the illegal movement and criminal use of firearms.
Federal Partner Program Activity (PA) |
Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | Planned Spending for 2011–12 |
---|---|---|---|
Canada Border Services Agency | Intelligence and Targeting Operations Directorate | Ongoing | $1.33 |
Total | $1.33 |
Expected Results: Valuable criminal intelligence shared in support of firearms crime investigations.
($ millions)Total Allocation For All Federal Partners (from Start to End Date) | Total Planned Spending for All Federal Partners for 2011–12 |
---|---|
Ongoing | $10.15 |
Results to be achieved by non–federal partners (if applicable): N/A
Contact information:
C/Supt. Geoffrey Francis
Director, Firearms Investigative and Enforcement Services Directorate
RCMP Canadian Firearms Program
73 Leikin Drive
Ottawa, Ontario K1A OR2
Email: Geoffrey.Francis@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Name of Internal Audit | Internal Audit Type | Status | Expected Completion Date |
---|---|---|---|
Directed Audit of Investment Plan | Operational - Assurance Engagement | In progress | March 2011 |
Pension Administration Outsourcing Project | Operational - Assurance Engagement | In progress | March 2011 |
Major Events Audit | Financial Assurance Engagement | Delayed | TBD |
Personnel Security | Operational - Assurance Engagement | In progress | June 2011 |
Quality of Human Resources Personnel Data | Operational - Assurance Engagement | In progress | June 2011 |
Technological Crime Program | Operational - Assurance Engagement | In progress | September 2011 |
Business Continuity Planning | Operational - Assurance Engagement | Planned | September 2011 |
Annual Audit of Sensitive Expenditures 2010-2011 | Operational - Assurance Engagement | Planned | Fall 2011 |
Financial Allocation and SEC Prioritization Processes and Controls | Financial Assurance Engagement | Planned | Winter 2012 |
Preliminary Assessment of IM/IT Data Quality Controls | Operational - Assurance Engagement | Planned | Winter 2012 |
Adequacy and Effectiveness of the Integrated Risk Management Framework | Operational - Assurance Engagement | Planned | Spring 2012 |
HR Planning Framework | Operational - Assurance Engagement | Planned | Spring 2012 |
Preliminary Assessment of Internal Controls for Financial Reporting | Financial Assurance Engagement | Planned | Spring 2012 |
Small Border Declaration Activities | Operational - Assurance Engagement | Planned | Summer 2012 |
Reliability and Data Integrity of CPIC Information | Operational - Assurance Engagement | Planned | Fall 2012 |
Annual Audit of Sensitive Expenditures 2011-2012 | Operational - Assurance Engagement | Planned | Fall 2012 |
Performance of Professional Standards and Public Complaints Investigations | Operational - Assurance Engagement | Planned | Winter 2013 |
Information to Support Aboriginal Contracting | Operational - Assurance Engagement | Planned | Winter 2013 |
Effectiveness and Efficiency of the Executive Officer Development and Resourcing Program | Operational - Assurance Engagement | Planned | Winter 2013 |
Efficiency and Effectiveness of Intelligence Coordination and Sharing | Operational - Assurance Engagement | Planned | Winter 2013 |
IT Security follow-up – Management Action Plans | Operational - Assurance Engagement | Planned | Spring 2013 |
Internal Controls for Financial Reporting – Follow-up to the preliminary assessment | Financial Assurance Engagement | Planned | Spring 2013 |
Electronic Link to Internal Audit Plan: N/A
Name of Evaluation | Program Activity | Status | Expected Completion Date |
---|---|---|---|
Alberta Health Care – Members Benefits Pilot | 4.1.2.1 Human Resource Management | In progress | June 2011 |
Border Integrity Pilot | 1.1.2.2 Border Integrity | In progress | June 2011 |
Marine Security Emergency Response Teams | 1.1.2.2 Border Integrity | Not yet started | October 2011 |
Great Lakes Marine Security Operations Centre | 1.1.2.2 Border Integrity | In progress | June 2011 |
Coastal Marine Security Operations Centres | 1.1.2.2 Border Integrity | In progress | November 2011 |
National Counterfiet Enforcement Strategy | 1.1.2.3 Financial Crime | Not yet started | June 2011 |
Managing Immigration Pressures in North America | 1.1.2.4 Federal Crime Enforcement | Not yet started | March 2012 |
Aboriginal Shield | 1.1.2.1 Drugs and Organized Crime | In progress | September 2011 |
Witness Protection Program | 1.1.2.1 Drugs and Organized Crime | Not yet started | October 2011 |
Field Coaching Program | 4.1.2.1 Human Resource Management | Not yet started | October 2011 |
Harassment Policy | 4.1.2.1 Human Resource Management | Not yet started | August 2012 |
Youth Officer Program | 1.1.1.1 Provincial/Territorial Policing | Not yet started | August 2011 |
Deal.Org | 1.1.2.1 Drugs and Organized Crime | Not yet started | September 2011 |
Change Management | 4.1.1.1 Management and Oversight | Not yet started | October 2011 |
Name of Evaluation | Program Activity | Status | Expected Completion Date |
---|---|---|---|
Initiative to Combat Contraband Tobacco | 1.1.2.4 Federal Crime Enforcement | Not yet started | March 2013 |
National Security | 1.1.2.5 National Security | Not yet started | March 2013 |
Disclosure and Major Case Management | 1.1.3.4 Disclosure and Major Case Management | Not yet started | March 2013 |
Operational Readiness and Response | 1.1.3.6 Operational Readiness and Response | Not yet started | March 2013 |
Criminal Intelligence | 1.2.1.6 Criminal Intelligence | Not yet started | March 2013 |
International Stability and Development | 2.1.1 International Stability and Development | Not yet started | March 2013 |
Management and Oversight | 4.1.1.1 Management and Oversight | Not yet started | March 2013 |
Communication | 4.1.1.2 Communication | Not yet started | March 2013 |
Name of Evaluation | Program Activity | Status | Expected Completion Date |
---|---|---|---|
Aboriginal Policing | 1.1.1.3 Aboriginal Policing | Not yet started | March 2014 |
Flight Operations | 1.1.3.3 Flight Operations | Not yet started | March 2014 |
Airport Policing | 1.1.1.4 Airport Policing | Not yet started | March 2014 |
Drugs and Organized Crime | 1.1.2.1 Drugs and Organized Crime | Not yet started | March 2014 |
Refugee Reform | 1.1.2.2 Border Integrity | Not yet started | March 2014 |
Financial Crime | 1.1.2.3 Financial Crime | Not yet started | March 2014 |
National Strategy for the Protection of Children from Sexual Exploitation on the Internet | 1.2.1.8 Canadian Police Centre for Missing and Exploited Children | Not yet started | March 2014 |
Lawful Access | 1.1.3.1 Technical Investigations | Not yet started | March 2014 |
Covert Operations | 1.1.3.7 Covert Operations | Not yet started | March 2014 |
Americas Strategy | 2.1.1.1 International Police Operations | Not yet started | March 2014 |
Information Management | 4.1.2.3 Information Management | Not yet started | March 2014 |
War Crimes | 1.1.2.4 Federal Crime Enforcement | Not yet started | March 2014 |
Electronic link to evaluation plan: Not yet available
Program Activity | Forecast Revenue 2010–11 |
Planned Revenue 2011–12 |
Planned Revenue 2012–13 |
Planned Revenue 2013–14 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Police Operations1 | 1,565.1 |
1,669.3 |
1,490.7 | 1,490.7 |
Canadian Law Enforcement Services | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Internal Services | 28.4 | 43.1 | 38.2 | 15.6 |
Total Respendable Revenue | 1,598.0 | 1,716.9 | 1,533.4 | 1,510.8 |
Program Activity | Forecast Revenue 2010–11 |
Planned Revenue 2011–12 |
Planned Revenue 2012–13 |
Planned Revenue 2013–14 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Police Operations | ||||
Licences and Permits | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Employment Benefit Plan Cost Recoveries2 | 84.3 | 87.6 | 78.3 | 78.3 |
Subtotal | 85.2 | 88.6 | 79.3 | 79.4 |
Canadian Law Enforcement Services | ||||
DNA Revenues | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Proceeds from Sales3 | 10.6 | 11.1 | 11.7 | 12.2 |
Subtotal | 14.6 | 15.3 | 16.1 | 16.9 |
Internal Services | ||||
Interest Revenue |
0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Proceeds from Sales3 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Miscellaneous | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
Rental of Public Property | 9.6 | 10.1 | 10.6 | 11.2 |
Subtotal | 12.1 | 12.7 | 13.3 | 14.0 |
Total Non-respendable Revenue | 111.8 | 116.5 | 108.7 | 110.2 |
Total Respendable and Non-respendable Revenue |
1,709.8 | 1,833.5 | 1,642.1 | 1,621.0 |
Note 1: Planned Respendable Revenues in FY 2011-2012 have increase slightly over FY 2010-2011 due to the approved increase in incremental funding for Community, Contract and Aboriginal Policing related to increases in the cost of providing contract policing services. These costs are partially offset by revenue collected from contract partners.
The significant decrease in FY 2012-2013 is due to this funding sunsetting in FY 2011-2012 and therefore the sunsetting of the associated revenues. Please see the Expenditure Profile in the RCMP 2011-2012 Report on Plans and Priorities for more details.
Note 2: Planned Non-Respendable Revenue for Employment Benefit Plan Recoveries in FY 2011-2012 has increased slightly due to the recovery of employee benefit plans costs associated with providing contract policing services. The decrease in FY 2012-2013 is due to funding for contract policing sunsetting.
Note 3: The Proceeds from Sales includes items such as Criminal Record Checks, Fingerprinting Services, Firearm Fees, Sale of Kit to Members, Mess Revenues and Access to Information Fees.
The Real Time Identification (RTID) Project was designed to facilitate the timely and efficient exchange of criminal records and fingerprint information and is a re-engineering of systems and business processes used for fingerprint identification, civil clearances and criminal records maintenance. It will transform the current paper-based workflow to an electronic workflow, enabling the “real time” identification of fingerprints submitted electronically.
Fingerprints are submitted by police agencies to support the creation of a criminal record or to search the criminal record repository during a criminal investigation or civil security screening. RTID will streamline these services, facilitate information sharing internationally, and permit an improved tracking of criminals by condensing identification turnaround times from weeks and months to hours and days.
The original RTID business case was approved as part of the Preliminary Project Approval (PPA) submitted in December 2004. Treasury Board Effective Project Approval (EPA) for Phase 1 dated October 2005 and EPA for Phase 2 dated June 2007 were both granted. Funding for the RTID Project was announced on April 20, 2004, under the National Security Policy.
The Project was established under the sponsorship of National Police Services. The Chief Information Officer was appointed Project Leader, responsible for achieving the technology improvements associated with the project. The business owner is the Assistant Commissioner, Forensic Science and Identification Services. From a project governance perspective, the RTID Project Director reports
to both the Chief Information Officer and the Assistant Commissioner, Forensic Science and Identification Services.
The Project is being delivered in two major Phases. RTID Phase 1 modernized the civil clearance process by replacing the Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) and implementing a new transaction manager, permitting agencies to submit their fingerprint information electronically. Phase 1 was closed from an Information Technology perspective in September 2008.
The scope of RTID Phase 2 has been amended based on recommendations made by an Independent Review conducted in 2010. Project work continues to refine the foundational systems delivered in Phase 1. This component of the project is in implementation phase.
Planning for the delivery of the remaining criminal records processing (disposition) requirements will follow the successful modernization of phase 1.
Lead Department | Royal Canadian Mounted Police |
---|---|
Contracting Authority | Public Works and Government Services Canada |
Participating Departments |
|
Major Subcontractor(s) |
Fujitsu Consulting (Canada) Inc., 600-360 Albert Street, Ottawa ON K1R 7X7 ADGA Group, 600-616 Albert Street, Ottawa ON K1P 5G3 Cogent Systems, Inc., 639 North Rosemead Blvd., Pasadena CA 91107, USA |
---|
List of Major Milestone | Date |
---|---|
Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) and infrastructure to permit electronic fingerprint processing in production |
March 2007 |
Electronic fingerprint processes for civil purposes implemented |
March 2007 |
Contract for Criminal Record Workflow Component of RTID System (Phase 2) awarded | February 2008 |
Electronic processing of latent (crime scene) fingerprints implemented | March 2008 |
Vulnerable Sector functionality implemented | October 2010 |
Amended EPA Submission | December 2010 |
EPA Approval | March 2011 |
The RTID Project aligns to the RCMP strategic outcome of "criminal activity affecting Canadians is reduced” and supports Forensic Science & Identification Services, Canadian Criminal Real Time Identification Services expected outcome “to maintain the national repository of criminal record and fingerprint information."
Service | 2001 | RTID |
---|---|---|
Fingerprint verification, civil 10-print searched (not linked to a criminal record) | 5 months | 3 business days |
Fingerprint verification, latent (crime scene) searches | 6 weeks | 24 hours |
Fingerprint verification, refugee 10-print searches | 6 weeks | 2 hours* |
Fingerprint verification, criminal 10-print searches | 10 weeks | 2 hours** |
Criminal record updates | 9 months | 24 hours*** |
Fingerprint verification, civil 10-print (linked to a criminal record) | 6 weeks | 3 business days |
* Available in production May 2010 ** Contingent upon Criminal Migration implementation ***Contingent upon a full RTID implementation |
The RTID Project is in the process of amending its Effective Project Approval (EPA) in order to re-establish the approval authority. The Independent Review and the subsequent options analysis recommended a “right–sized approach with a funding shortfall.” An amended EPA submission to Treasury Board will be submitted in the spring of 2011 to re-baseline the project schedule. No additional funding will be requested as the shortfall will be funded through the RCMP’s annual reference levels.
There are no industrial benefits of the Real Time Identification Project.
Notes
1 As defined in the Policy on the Management of Projects
2 As defined in the Policy on the Management of Major Crown Projects.
Program Activity | Forecast Spending 2010–11 |
Planned Spending 2011–12 |
Planned Spending 2012–13 |
Planned Spending 2013–14 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Police Operations | 147.0 | 149.3 | 121.3 | 113.3 |
Canadian Law Enforcement Services | 5.0 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.1 |
International Operations | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Canadian Police Culture and Heritage | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Statutory Payments | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Internal Services | 151.5 | 128.6 | 115.9 | 91.4 |
Total | 303.5 | 281.1 | 240.41 | 207.72 |
Note 1: The decrease in Planned Spending from 2011-2012 to 2012-2013 is related to the funding that will sunset in 2011-2012 for the provision of policing services under the Provincial Police Services Agreements.
Note 2: The decrease in Planned Spending from 2012-2013 to 2013-2014 is related to the sunset of funding for the RCMP Training Academy upgrades and the purchase of Pacific Patrol Vessels projects.
Name of User Fee | Fee Type | Fee-setting Authority | Reason for Planned Introduction of or Amendment to Fee | Effective Date of Planned Change | Consultation and Review Process Planned |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Business Licences | Regulatory | Firearms Fees Regulation | Firearms Fees Regulation | N/A | See note 1 below |
Individual Licences | Regulatory | Firearms Fees Regulation | Firearms Fees Regulation | N/A | See note 2 below |
Authorizations | Regulatory | Firearms Fees Regulation | Firearms Fees Regulation | N/A | See note 3 below |
Non-resident Permits | Regulatory | Firearms Fees Regulation | Firearms Fees Regulation | N/A | See note 4 below |
Services for replacement of documents | Regulatory | Firearms Fees Regulation | Firearms Fees Regulation | N/A | See note 2 below |
Name of User Fee | Fee Type | Fee-setting Authority | Reason for Planned Introduction of or Amendment to Fee | Effective Date of Planned Change | Consultation and Review Process Planned |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act | Other Products and Services |
Access to Information Act |
Access to Information Act |
N/A | See note 5 below |
Performance monitoring mechanisms have been established using the RCMP's Annual Performance Plan tool.
Notes:
1. Business firearms licences are renewable every three years (except for an Ammo only business).
2. On May 17, 2006, the Government of Canada announced that individuals no longer have to pay a fee for the renewal of their possession-only licence (POL) or their possession and acquisition licence (PAL). The fee waiver also applies to:
The fee waiver is anticipated to be in effect until May 17, 2011.
3. Fee costing studies were conducted in 1995.
4. A Non-Resident Firearms Declaration, confirmed by a customs officer, is deemed to be a temporary licence valid for a period up to 60 days.
5. For Access to Information requests, the policy of the RCMP is to waive reproduction fees whenever less than 50 pages are disclosed. However, when more than 50 pages are disclosed, fees may be calculated for the total number of pages. For extensive or complex requests, search and preparation fees are charged as determined on a case-by-case basis. For more
information, please refer to the RCMP Access to Information and Privacy Branch website.