This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
The Honourable Chuck Strahl
Minister, Agriculture and Agri-Food
SECTION II - ANALYSIS OF PROGRAM ACTIVITIES BY STRATEGIC OUTCOME
SECTION III - SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
SECTION IV - OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST
Welcome to the Canadian Grain Commission's Report on Plans and Priorities 2007-08. This report details how the Canadian Grain Commission (CGC) intends to use its resources to carry out its responsibilities to protect grain producers' interests and to ensure a dependable commodity for Canada's international and domestic markets.
As Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food, I am proud of our efforts to work together with all stakeholders to secure a bright future for Canada's farm families and the sector. In fact, collaboration is the hallmark of this Portfolio. By our concerted action, we are making great strides in helping Canada's farmers overcome immediate pressures, while putting the sector on a solid foundation for the long term.
The Portfolio includes Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, the National Farm Products Council, the Canadian Dairy Commission, the Canadian Grain Commission, and Farm Credit Canada. While the organizations within the Portfolio have different mandates, they share a common purpose: to make our agriculture and agri-food sector stronger, more competitive and sustainable into the future. Through portfolio collaboration, we are working efficiently and effectively in the interests of all Canadians.
Over the next years, the development and implementation of the Next Generation of Agriculture and Agri-Food Policy will be key to the sector's success. Our producers need continuously updated policies and programs from governments to help them thrive in the rapidly-evolving economy and manage the inherent risks of the business. I am counting on the energy and expertise of the Agriculture and Agri-Food Portfolio to translate these new policy directions into a prosperous reality in Canadian agriculture and agri-food.
Canada is known around the world for the quality, consistency, reliability and safety of its grain and grain products. This is a key factor in permitting Canadian exporters to market successfully in competitive international grain markets. In addition, an effective quality assurance system is essential for producers in order to realize maximum value from their grain in the face of the current challenging economic environment.
The CGC has a long-term commitment to building and maintaining a strong quality assurance system for the Canadian grain industry from producers to customers. In order to do this, the CGC must not only respond to historical challenges facing the grain quality assurance system, but also must anticipate and respond to significant technological advancements and other changes in the grain industry. Accordingly, CGC operations directly support Canada's efforts to brand Canadian agriculture as a leader in food safety and quality, science and innovation, and business risk management.
On September 18, 2006 an independent and comprehensive review of the CGC and the provisions and operations of the Canada Grain Act was tabled in Parliament. This legislative review was commissioned by AAFC and conducted by COMPAS Inc., a Toronto-based public opinion and customer research consulting firm. The report is available on AAFC's web site at www.agr.gc.ca/cgcreview. The COMPAS report was referred to the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food (SCAAF) for consideration. SCAAF held meetings and called witnesses, before tabling its "Report on the Review of the Canada Grain Act and the Canadian Grain Commission Conducted by COMPAS Inc." in Parliament on December 5, 2006. A government response to the Standing Committee report is expected in April, 2007. The review of the CGC is part of an integrated strategic approach to the future of the Canadian grains sector and provides guidance as to how the CGC can effectively add more value to Canadian producers and the grain industry in general. http://cmte.parl.gc.ca/Content/HOC/committee/391/agri/reports/rp2564356/agrirp05/01-cov2-e.htm
This Report on Plans and Priorities highlights the CGC's plans to continue to provide an effective grain quality assurance system that enhances the marketing of Canadian grain in the interests of producers. The report also sets the standards by which the CGC's performance in meeting its objectives can be assessed.
The Honourable Chuck Strahl
Minister, Agriculture and Agri-Food and
Minister for the Canadian Wheat Board
Welcome to the Canadian Grain Commission's (CGC) Report on Plans and Priorities for the fiscal year 2007-08. The CGC is the federal agency responsible for setting standards of quality and regulating Canada's grain handling system. Our vision is to be a leader in delivering excellence and innovation in grain quality and quantity assurance, research, and producer protection.
The quality assurance program delivered by the CGC assures consistent and reliable grain quality that meets the needs of international and domestic markets. The CGC is continually building on the grain quality assurance system (GQAS) to maintain market competitiveness and Canada's reputation as a consistent supplier of quality grain. The CGC is working alongside the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food's (AAF) portfolio partners and the grain industry to add value to Canadian producers and Canada's grain quality assurance system.
While the CGC operates in a climate of constant change stemming from shifting international and domestic markets, technological advancements, and evolving end-user needs, the Canada Grain Act has not been significantly changed since 1971. In addition, competitive markets and international standards and legislation are increasing demands for both grain quality and grain safety assurances. The CGC continues to deliver its mandated and regulatory responsibilities while re-allocating resources to new and emerging issues, but has faced significant funding pressures in recent years.
Over the past several years, reviews of the CGC have repeatedly recognized the value of the CGC to the grain sector, but have also identified the need for change. Most recently, on September 18, 2006, a report concerning the future of the CGC and the Canada Grain Act was tabled in Parliament ( www.agr.gc.ca/cgcreview). The independent report was commissioned by AAFC and conducted by COMPAS Inc. The COMPAS report was subsequently referred to the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food (SCAAF) for consideration. SCAAF tabled its review of the COMPAS report in Parliament on December 5, 2006. http://cmte.parl.gc.ca/Content/HOC/committee/391/agri/reports/rp2564356/agrirp05/01-cov2-e.htm
The CGC is studying the COMPAS and SCAAF report recommendations and working collaboratively with AAFC on the next steps to move forward to ensure the long-term success of Canada's GQAS and add optimal value for Canadian grain producers and the grain sector, ultimately to enhance Canada's competitive advantage in global grain markets.
The CGC supports the goals of the current Agriculture Policy Framework (APF) by ensuring grain and grain products meet appropriate standards while assisting Canadian grain producers in receiving maximum value for their products. The CGC is working in close collaboration with the other organizations in the AAF portfolio, provincial and territorial counterparts, and with a wide range of stakeholders in the development of the Next Generation of Agriculture and Agri-Food Policy, particularly in the areas of Food Safety and Quality; Market Development and Trade; and Science and Innovation, to ensure that the new policies and programs effectively and efficiently meet the needs of all those working in the agriculture and agri-food sector.
This report outlines the CGC's plans and priorities for the fiscal year 2007-08. I am confident that our strategies will improve Canada's GQAS and help achieve maximum value for producers and Canadians overall.
Chris Hamblin
Chief Commissioner
I submit for tabling in Parliament, the 2007-08 Report on Plans and Priorities (RPP) for the Canadian Grain Commission.
This document has been prepared based on the reporting principles contained in the Guide for the Preparation of Part III of the 2007-2008 Estimates: Reports on Plans and Priorities and Departmental Performance Reports:
Gordon Miles
Chief Operating Officer
Reason for existence:
The CGC administers the provisions of the Canada Grain Act. The CGC's mandate as set out in this Act is to, "in the interests of the grain producers, establish and maintain standards of quality for Canadian grain and regulate grain handling in Canada, to ensure a dependable commodity for domestic and export markets."
The CGC vision is to be "A leader in delivering excellence and innovation in grain quality and quantity assurance, research, and producer protection."
The Honourable Chuck Strahl, Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food is the Minister responsible for the CGC. The CGC is headed by a Chief Commissioner, an Assistant Chief Commissioner, and a Commissioner who are all appointed by the Governor in Council. The Commissioner position is currently vacant. The Chief Commissioner reports to the Minister. The Chief Operating Officer reports to the Chief Commissioner and co-ordinates the activities of the CGC's operating divisions.
The CGC is organized into the Executive, Corporate Services, Grain Research Laboratory (GRL), Industry Services, and Finance divisions. Its head office is located in Winnipeg, Manitoba. Industry Services comprises five regions: Bayport, Eastern, Pacific, Prairie and Thunder Bay. As of March 31, 2006, the CGC employed 635 full-time equivalents and operated 16 offices across Canada.
The CGC may have up to six Governor in Council appointed Assistant Commissioners for the main grain producing areas of Canada. At present, the CGC has three Assistant Commissioners. The Assistant Commissioners deal with producer and grain industry complaints and inquiries, and publicize the activities of the CGC at the farm level. Section III provides further details on the CGC's organizational structure.
The CGC enhances grain1 marketing through inspection, weighing, research, and producer support programs and services identified in the strategic outcomes in Section II. The provision of these CGC programs and activities results in equitable grain transactions and consistent and reliable grain shipments.
Funding for CGC programs and activities is through a combination of revolving fund and appropriation sources.
1Grain refers to any seed designated by regulation as a grain for the purposes of the Canada Grain Act. This includes barley, beans, buckwheat, canola, chick peas, corn, fababeans, flaxseed, lentils, mixed grain, mustard seed, oats, peas, rapeseed, rye, safflower seed, solin, soybeans, sunflower seed, triticale and wheat.
2007-2008 | 2008-2009* | 2009-2010* |
---|---|---|
$75,997 | $46,272 | $46,272 |
2007-2008 | 2008-2009* | 2009-2010* |
---|---|---|
664 | 403 | 403 |
*Note: These resources are the currently approved funding levels based on the CGC’s Annual Reference Level Update (ARLU) report. The CGC has received additional appropriation revenue over the past several years to maintain its resource levels. In 2007-2008 the CGC received $30 million appropriation in addition to its annual appropriation of $5 million. Planned spending for 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 includes only the annual appropriation of $5 million resulting in a reporting variance between years. An additional $30 million in appropriation has been allocated for 2008-2009 but is not included in these resource levels as it was not approved at the time of the ARLU report.
Priority Name | Type |
---|---|
1. Ongoing delivery of the CGC mandate under the Canada Grain Act in a climate of constantly changing international and domestic markets, technological advancements, and evolving end-user needs and preferences. | Ongoing |
2. Positioning the Canadian Grain Quality Assurance System (GQAS) to remain relevant and to support the continued competitiveness of Canadian grains in both domestic and international markets. | Ongoing |
3. Regulatory compliance. | Ongoing |
4. Sustainable CGC funding mechanism. | Ongoing |
5. Certification to meet International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards. | New |
Program Activity | Expected Results | Planned Spending ($ thousands) | Contributes to the Following Priorities | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007-2008 | 2008-2009* | 2009-2010* | |||
Strategic Outcome 1: A grain quality assurance system that addresses the changing requirements of domestic and international grain markets | |||||
Deliver inspection and testing services | Increased buyer satisfaction through delivery of consistent Canadian grain quality and increased marketability of Canadian grain. | $50,279 | $31,040 | $31,040 | Priority #1, #2, #4 and #5 |
Strategic Outcome 2: A grain quantity assurance system that addresses the changing needs of the grain industry | |||||
Deliver weighing services | Client satisfaction with CGC weighing and dispute resolution programs. | $14,969 | $9,241 | $9,241 | Priority #1, #2, #4 and #5 |
Strategic Outcome 3: Research and development on grain quality that enhances the marketability of Canadian grain | |||||
Conduct research to understand and measure grain quality | Adaptation of new objective methods for quality assessment and grain safety assurance; adoption and publication of new methods by current standard setting organizations; provision of accurate quality assessment tools for new breeder lines. | $7,663 | $4,130 | $4,130 | Priority #1, #2, #4 and #5 |
Strategic Outcome 4: Producers' rights are supported to ensure fair treatment within the grain handling industry | |||||
Protect producers' rights | Increased producer satisfaction with the grain handling system. | $3,086 | $1,861 | $1,861 | Priority #1, #3 and #4 |
*Note: These resources are the currently approved funding levels based on the CGC’s Annual Reference Level Update (ARLU) report. The CGC has received additional appropriation revenue over the past several years to maintain its resource levels. In 2007-2008 the CGC received $30 million appropriation in addition to its annual appropriation of $5 million. Planned spending for 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 includes only the annual appropriation of $5 million resulting in a reporting variance between years. An additional $30 million in appropriation has been allocated for 2008-2009 but is not included in these resource levels as it was not approved at the time of the ARLU report.
The Canadian grain industry operates in a climate of constant change stemming from shifting international and domestic markets, technological advancements, and evolving end-user needs and preferences. Canada's grain quality assurance system (GQAS) must be able to adapt to keep pace with the evolution of the global grain industry. This is particularly important considering Canada exported more than $26.6 billion worth of agriculture and agri-food products in 2005. Approximately 34% of these exports were grains, oilseeds, and related products with an estimated value of $9 billion.
Canada's Performance 2006 is the sixth annual report to Parliament on the federal government's contribution to Canada's performance as a nation, highlighting both strengths and areas for improvement. Canada's Performance 2006 is structured around four main policy areas. These include: economic affairs, social affairs, international affairs, and government affairs. Within these policy areas are thirteen broad Government of Canada outcomes which form the framework used for the whole of government reporting. The whole of government reporting framework groups departmental strategic outcomes and program activities into the thirteen Government of Canada outcomes.
All four of the CGC's strategic outcomes and program activities align with the key federal policy area of 'economic affairs'. As illustrated below, three of the CGC strategic outcomes and program activities align with and directly contribute to the pursuit of the Government of Canada outcome area An Innovative and Knowledge-based Economy. The fourth CGC strategic outcome and program activity aligns with and contributes to the pursuit of the Government of Canada outcome area of A Fair and Secure Marketplace.
CGC Strategic Outcome | CGC Program Activity | Link to Government of Canada Outcome Area |
---|---|---|
1. A grain quality assurance system that addresses the changing requirements of domestic and international grain markets | Deliver inspection and testing services | An innovative and knowledge-based economy |
2. A grain quantity assurance system that addresses the changing needs of the grain industry | Deliver weighing services | An innovative and knowledge-based economy |
3. Research and development on grain quality that enhances the marketability of Canadian grain | Conduct research to understand and measure grain quality | An innovative and knowledge-based economy |
4. Producers' rights are supported to ensure fair treatment within the grain handling system | Protect producers' rights | A fair and secure marketplace |
Canada is known worldwide as a supplier of quality grain and our edge in the marketplace has always been quality and consistency. In order to maintain this advantage in a climate of constant domestic and global change, the CGC's strategic outcomes are directly focused on, and committed to, delivering excellence and innovation in grain quality and quantity assurance, innovative research, and producer protection.
The CGC's corporate infrastructure allows the organization to deliver the programs necessary to achieve its strategic outcomes and program activities and results in improved performance, increased employee productivity, and effective communication with industry and producers. Although the CGC is a small department, the organization is committed to fulfilling its responsibility for government wide initiatives such as the Management Accountability Framework, providing services in both official languages, the Government On Line (GOL) initiative, and effective partnering with other government organizations to provide service to Canadians in the most efficient and effective manner possible. The cost of implementing government wide initiatives and CGC corporate infrastructure are accounted for in the overall costs of delivering the CGC strategic outcomes and program activities. Section IV provides further information on the CGC's plans and priorities with respect to government-wide initiatives and corporate infrastructure.
The departmental plans and priorities of the CGC delineate its response to the continual changes in the grain industry and are directed at meeting the sector's current needs. The following section outlines the major priorities of the CGC during the planning period. While some of the priorities have very significant potential to impact the capacity of the CGC to carry out its mandate, the resource commitments are based on the maintenance of ongoing CGC operations.
The following departmental priorities are critical to making significant progress towards the realization of the CGC's strategic outcomes. The relationships between CGC priorities, strategic outcomes, and program activities are further detailed in Section II.
Priority #1 : Ongoing delivery of the CGC mandate under the Canada Grain Act in a climate of constantly changing international and domestic markets, technological advancements, and evolving end-user needs and preferences. |
The CGC will continue to fulfil its mandate through the operation of a national GQAS. This entails effective inspection, weighing, monitoring, and grain sanitation programs to ensure grain exports are uniform and consistent with regard to intrinsic quality and grain safety assurance, while at the same time ensuring fair grain transactions. In addition, the CGC's research and development on grain quality will continue in order to enhance the marketability of Canadian grain. http://grainscanada.gc.ca/
The first priority of the CGC is to continue consistent daily delivery of programs and services within each of its organizational divisions in support of the CGC mandate. Ongoing delivery of the CGC mandate contributes directly to the achievement of all of the CGC's strategic outcomes and program activities. The major programs and services performed within each organizational division in support of this priority and the on-going human resources management activities necessary for the successful delivery of this priority are outlined below:
Priority #2: Positioning the Canadian GQAS to Remain Relevant and to Support the Continued Competitiveness of Canadian Grains in both Domestic and International Markets. |
Canada's robust GQAS has permitted Canadian grain to be "branded" internationally for many years, providing Canada with a competitive advantage in the global grain market. However, the sensitivities of international grain buyers are increasing and generating more and more specific end-use and certification requirements. As such, the CGC has recognized the importance of continuing to evolve and refine the Canadian GQAS to remain relevant and competitive in both the domestic and international marketplaces.
The CGC is continually developing and implementing many programs, initiatives, and new research methods and processes aimed at strengthening the Canadian GQAS. Enhancing Canada's GQAS directly supports CGC strategic outcome #1 (a grain quality assurance system that addresses the changing requirements of domestic and international grain markets), strategic outcome #2 (a grain quantity assurance system that addresses the changing needs of the grain industry), and strategic outcome #3 (research and development on grain quality that enhances the marketability of Canadian grain).
Currently, Canada's kernel visual distinguishability (KVD) requirement for wheat allows quick and cost effective segregation of wheat into quality classes based on visual distinguishability. While KVD has provided Canadian wheat growers a competitive quality advantage, there are compelling reasons to move away from wheat segregation based solely on KVD. These include:
There are also pressures to address KVD issues outside of cereal grains. There are industry pressures to develop yellow seeded (high linolenic) flax for the rapidly growing food flax industry even though the yellow seeded characteristic is currently the identifier for low linolenic solin. In addition, the development of canola quality Brassica juncea lines has created a serious KVD issue between canola and condiment mustard types as the physical visual appearances are similar while the quality characteristic differences between the two are mutually exclusive.
The CGC will continue to develop and evaluate methods and systems to move away from KVD. The various CGC programs, initiatives, research methods and processes aimed at supporting this priority are described below:
To address the challenges of visually indistinguishable nonregistered wheat varieties and the constraints that KVD imposes on the development and handling of non-milling wheats, the CGC will continue to develop and implement the integrated WQAS program that was initiated in December 2003. For further information on this program refer to: http://grainscanada.gc.ca/newsroom/news_releases/2003/2003-12-19-e.htm.
The WQAS strategy is composed of three elements:
1. Increased monitoring of railcar and vessel shipments for nonregistered wheat varieties
To address growing sectoral concerns, the CGC has increased its monitoring of grain shipments throughout the licensed handling system. Currently, the CGC coordinates an extensive cargo monitoring program to support its certification processes, which includes the use of electrophoresis, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and DNA-based fingerprinting technology to monitor for nonregistered varieties and ineligible varieties. This monitoring program provides the industry with information to help them better manage the handling system and requires that elevator operators exercise their own due diligence.
During the planning period, the CGC will continue with its increased monitoring of railcar and vessel shipments for the presence and source of nonregistered wheat varieties to support CGC certification processes and ultimately maintain end-use processing quality and customer perceptions of Canadian grain.
2. Development of rapid affordable variety identification (VID) technology
Variety identification (VID), combined with objective testing, will underpin the future of the Canadian GQAS and sustain Canada's position as an international grain competitor. In order to support grain grading and inspection, to monitor the variety composition of export shipments, and to provide assurances for variety-specific shipments of wheat and barley, the CGC has developed and continues to develop non-visual methods for VID. Knowing the variety composition of a shipment is a practical alternative for classifying grains into end-use classes. Development of this technology will help meet the needs of marketers and producers.
Currently, the CGC performs protein electrophoresis and DNA fingerprinting on individual kernels of grain. Many kernels must be analysed to determine the variety composition of a sample. The long-term goal is to develop a DNA-based method that will determine the variety composition of a ground sample of grain rather than multiple individual kernels. The aim is to provide technology that accurately quantifies the variety composition of grain shipments in a timely manner in a commercial environment.
Through its VID work, the CGC will continue to be a leader in the development of VID technology, the establishment of comprehensive variety fingerprint databases for wheat and barley, and the implementation of these tools for the benefit of Canada's grain industry. The CGC is committed to working collaboratively with other organizations in an effort to transfer VID technology to the private sector for use in commercial VID testing.
3. The development of a proposal to restructure the western wheat classes to enable the development and integration of non-milling wheat varieties.
The CGC will continue the process regarding the proposal to restructure some western Canadian wheat classes. This proposal is aimed at reducing the constraints KVD imposes on the development and handling of non-milling wheat, such as high-yielding feed and industrial varieties, as well as concerns associated with the slow degradation of KVD between existing wheat classes.
The CGC released a discussion paper titled The Future of Western Canadian Wheat Quality Assurance in June 2005. After thorough evaluation of all stakeholder feedback and divergent viewpoints, the CGC intends to proceed with implementation of a wheat class restructuring plan that represents a balanced solution to stakeholder needs. The major wheat classes (CWRS and CWAD) will remain unchanged in terms of variety registration requirements, including KVD. Effective August 1, 2008, a Canada Western General Purpose (CWGP) wheat class will be introduced and KVD requirements for the six minor wheat classes will be removed. However, varieties within these minor classes cannot have KVD conflicts with CWRS or CWAD. For further information refer to: http://grainscanada.gc.ca/Pubs/discussions/wqas/update06_06_01contents-e.htm.
Implementation of this plan will provide producers, marketers and customers with access to a wider range of wheat varieties than the current system permits, while continuing to protect the integrity of the major milling classes and grades.
In a marketplace with increasing global demands for unique product specifications and traceability requirements, the CGC is developing and implementing process verification programs with the goal of enhancing global acceptance of Canadian grain by delivering specific quality attributes demanded by domestic and international buyers.
Ineligible Varieties Working Group (IVWG)
The CGC is part of a grain industry working group (IVWG) whose objective is to develop protocols for sampling, testing and process controls that will minimize the incidence of visually indistinguishable ineligible varieties being shipped to buyers under incorrect certification. The working group is investigating the potential for an industry Quality Management System that will have the CGC monitor and audit logistical processes within the Canadian grain handling system.
The IVWG is developing protocols that apply to varietal testing and process controls throughout the grain supply chain (originating at licensed primary elevators through to licensed terminal elevators and vessel loading) for all cargo shipments of western Canadian wheat and durum that will receive a Certificate Final.
Canadian Identity Preserved Recognition System (CIPRS)
CIPRS is a voluntary tool for process verification that the industry can use to provide third party assurance of the processes used throughout the supply chain, from producer to shipper, to deliver the specific quality attributes and traceability that some domestic and international buyers require. During the 2007-08 planning period the CGC will continue to implement CIPRS to recognize industry's ability to deliver products with improved quality assurance systems for maximum acceptance in global markets. In addition, the CGC will be addressing the need to develop further tools and standards for process verification to address the need to segregate varieties with unique quality attributes within closed-loop identity preservation programs.
The CGC is also in the process of developing its CIPRS+ program in partnership with Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives and the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. The infrastructure supporting CIPRS is being adapted to provide verification of HACCP (Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points) based processes in order to provide safety assurances for grain. For further information on the status of the CIPRS and CIPRS+ programs refer to: http://grainscanada.gc.ca/prodser/ciprs/ciprs1-e.asp.
Coherent and Integrated Approach to Handling Imported Grain
The CGC will continue to support Canadian World Trade Organization (WTO) obligations regarding the treatment of imported grain, while at the same time maintaining the integrity and policy objectives of the Canadian GQAS. The CGC will continue to work with appropriate government portfolio organizations and relevant industry stakeholders to explore, examine, and refine an integrated approach to handling imported grain.
Many international grain buyers are investigating the exporting country of origin's practices and regulations concerning such factors as approved genetically modified (GM) events, pesticide registrations and usage, and recognized grain and food safety programs. International concern is also growing with respect to the adventitious presence (AP) of grain in shipments. AP refers to the unintended, technically unavoidable presence of GM material in an agri-food commodity. The presence of adventitious materials has potentially significant impacts on the marketability of Canadian grain.
During the planning period, the CGC will continue to augment its GQAS system with objective ways to quantify the impact of degrading factors and to assure grain quality and safety for end- users.
Genetically Modified (GM) Grains
With increasing consumer concerns, many countries are establishing GM labelling and traceability requirements. As a result, the ability to segregate GM grain and non-GM varieties is critical to maintaining Canada's international market share and meeting the requirements of the International Biosafety Protocol. The ability to segregate GM from non-GM grains will benefit exporters of Canadian food products given that there is a growing requirement to label products.
During the planning period, the CGC will continue to validate GM organism detection methods and focus research on the detection and identification of GM grains. The CGC will also continue to collaborate with Agriculture Portfolio partners in the development of operational and testing efficiencies to address GM organism and AP concerns.
Grain Safety
The CGC is currently developing new and improved objective methods for testing chemical residues, natural toxins, and trace elements because of the growing complexity and sophistication of regulatory and technological requirements of importing countries. Research initiatives directed at cargo specific grain safety testing for toxins such as deoxynivalenol (DON) associated with fusarium and ochratoxin A are currently underway. http://grainscanada.gc.ca/Grl/grain_safety/grain_safety-e.htm
Grading System Factors - Falling Number (FN) and Rapid Viscosity Analysis (RVA)
FN is the internationally accepted measure of alpha-amylase activity - an enzyme found in sprout-damaged (germinated) wheat. Many buyers place strict limits on FN in the wheat they buy because flour damaged by alpha-amylase results in undesirable final product characteristics. Sprout damage in wheat is difficult to assess - a wheat sample containing even a small amount of severely sprouted kernels may have high levels of alpha-amylase activity.
In the Canadian wheat grading system, sprout damage is a visually assessed grading factor. The CGC is currently chairing a grain industry working group to determine how best to implement FN into the grading system should technology prove to be viable.
During the planning period, the CGC is committed to continuing its assessment of new RapidVisco Analyser (RVATM) technology. RVA technology offers an objective assessment of sprout damage by estimating FN values quickly and simply. The technology may provide the Canadian grain industry with the ability to segregate producer deliveries at the primary elevator. RVA technology also may provide a solution to precise, objective results in licensed primary and terminal elevators where space for specialized laboratory equipment is limited and rapid turnaround is key.
Priority #3: Regulatory Compliance |
The CGC is committed to a sound regulatory framework that is effective, responsive, cost-efficient and accountable. The CGC's regulatory requirements will add value to the entire grain sector including producers and Canadians in general and will address the risks and challenges present in today's GQAS taking into account producer needs, changing agricultural business environments, and the need to enhance the sector's competitiveness.
The CGC promotes, maintains and enforces compliance with the Canada Grain Act through compliance promotion programs, inspection and weighing activities, monitoring, and investigations. The CGC collects grain samples from a variety of sources (primary elevator deliveries, terminal elevator unloads, new crop, and exports) in order to measure the effectiveness of, and compliance to, grain quality assurance standards and the overall GQAS.
In May 2005, the CGC provided notice of its intention to require compliance to the licensing provisions of the Canada Grain Act to enhance producer protection and strengthen the grain quality assurance system. To facilitate compliance, the CGC is continuing its efforts to reduce the costs and administrative requirements of licensees. For example, the CGC has implemented measures to streamline the licence renewal process and continues to explore and evaluate alternative security instruments while still providing adequate financial protection to producers. In addition, the CGC will increase resources in the licensing, auditing, and compliance operational units to address the increase in the number of licensees. Enhancing licensing and security directly aligns the CGC with its legislative obligations and supports CGC strategic outcome #4 (producers' rights are supported to ensure fair treatment within the grain handling system).
Priority #4: Sustainable CGC Funding Mechanism |
The CGC is mandated to perform services as legislated by the Canada Grain Act. Over the past 15 years, a combination of increasing costs and a freeze on mandatory fee levels has led to the CGC being chronically under-funded. During this time period, cost recovery levels have dropped from around 90% to between 50 and 60%. This has required the CGC to seek interim government appropriations on an annual basis.
In order to meet evolving grain industry needs, labour contract settlements, and general increases in the costs of goods and services, the CGC has engaged in an ongoing process of cost containment and internal re-allocation of resources to new and emerging priorities. The CGC recognizes the importance of continuing to evolve and refine the Canadian GQAS to remain relevant and competitive in both the domestic and international marketplaces and will continue to work diligently to improve how it adds value to the grain industry and producers. The CGC will continue to seek a sustainable funding mechanism to maintain the CGC's capacity to create value for producers, the grain industry, and the Canadian public as an integral part of a successful Canadian GQAS. This priority is critical in order for the CGC to continue to fulfill its statutory mandate and in achieving all of its strategic outcomes and program activities.
Priority #5: Certification to Meet International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Standards |
ISO is a non-governmental organization and is the world's largest developer of standards. ISO itself does not regulate or legislate and its standards are voluntary. Industry Services, the CGC's main operating division, is ISO 9001:2000 certified. The ISO 9000 series of standards are primarily concerned with quality management specifically with respect to quality assurance in production, installation, and servicing. Maintaining ISO certification in Industry Services directly supports CGC strategic outcome #1 (a grain quality assurance system that addresses the changing requirements of domestic and international grain markets) and strategic oucome #2 (a grain quantity assurance system that addresses the changing needs of the grain industry).
While Industry Services is ISO 9001:2000 certified, the CGC's GRL will be assessing the applicability of ISO/IEC 17025 certification to certain methods in its laboratory testing environment. IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) is the leading global organization that prepares and publishes international standards for all electrical, electronic and related technologies. The ISO/IEC 17025 standard contains most of the aspects of the ISO 9000 series with the additional requirement of proven competencies in the area of certification, and general requirements for the competencies of testing and calibration of laboratories. ISO/IEC certification in the GRL directly supports CGC strategic outcome #3 (research and development on grain quality that enhances the marketability of Canadian grain).
ISO certification throughout the CGC will improve efficiencies and give the customer increased confidences in the processes and testing methods that support Canada's GQAS. There is wide acceptance of ISO standards and an expectation by domestic and international grain customers that organizations such as the CGC conform to them.
The CGC is organized around four strategic outcomes that reflect the planned direction of the CGC as well as the daily delivery of the CGC's program activities. The four strategic outcomes are:
1. A grain quality assurance system that addresses the changing requirements of domestic and international grain markets
2. A grain quantity assurance system that addresses the changing needs of the grain industry
3. Research and development on grain quality that enhances the marketability of Canadian grain
4. Producers' rights are supported to ensure fair treatment within the grain handling system
To illustrate the significance of each strategic outcome, the CGC has identified corresponding program activities and resources required. Each program activity has associated ongoing key programs or services with their own expected results. This section provides detailed information on each program activity and illustrates how the program activities and key programs or services contribute to and support the strategic outcomes and departmental plans and priorities.
Corporate infrastructure and government-wide initiatives are integral to achieving results and are factored into delivering the strategic outcomes using the CGC's costing model. The discussion and activities relevant to the CGC's plans and priorities on government-wide initiatives and corporate infrastructure can be found in Section IV.
Strategic Outcome 1: A grain quality assurance system that addresses the changing requirements of domestic and international grain markets |
2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|
$50,279 | $31,040 | $31,040 |
2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|
445 | 271 | 271 |
An effective grain quality assurance system ensures the enhanced marketability of Canadian grain which directly benefits producers and the grain industry. Daily provision of grain inspection services supported by a strong scientific and technical base, including testing of grain, milling, baking, cooking, or making various end-use products form a major part of the quality assurance system.
There are major challenges facing the CGC and the GQAS including increased international emphasis on end-use functionality, growing global competition, and shifting domestic crop production and volume fluctuations. It is vital that the grading system and CGC services be continually adapted to the end-use needs of domestic and international buyers of Canadian grain, and to the ongoing structural changes within the grain industry.
The overall expected result of delivering inspection and testing services is increased buyer satisfaction through delivery of consistent Canadian grain quality and increased marketability of Canadian grain.
This program activity supports departmental Priority #1 and Priority #2. Delivering inspection and testing services supports not only the ongoing delivery of the CGC mandate, but also positions Canada with a sustainable competitive advantage in global grain markets. Addressing Priority #4 (a sustainable CGC funding mechanism) is critical for the CGC to continue fulfilling its statutory mandate and maintain service levels to producers and the grain industry. Priority #5 (ISO certification) supports efficient and effective processes and enhances the CGC's international reputation for providing services that assure consistent, uniform grain quality in every shipment.
2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|
$39,904 | $24,635 | $24,635 |
Provision of grain inspection and grading services forms a major part of the quality assurance system. The CGC delivers inspection services in accordance with the legislative mandate of the Canada Grain Act in order to meet the requirements of the grain industry from producers to customers. Grades allow buyers to identify end-use value without the need for end-use testing or direct examination of individual lots of grain. This improves the efficiency of grain handling and helps to ensure that sellers receive payment that reflects the value of their grain.
The following ongoing inspection activities and testing services are integral components of the overall delivery of the CGC's GQAS:
The expected result of this key program is ongoing data collection and analysis that supports an effective GQAS to facilitate and maintain the marketability of Canadian grain and customer satisfaction. Daily provision of inspection and testing services for the GQAS is a key mandate supporting program that directly contributes to departmental Priority #1. Maintaining and delivering an effective Quality Management System as per ISO 9001:2000 standards directly supports departmental Priority #5.
To measure its success in delivering this key program and achieving the expected results, the CGC uses the following tools:
2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|
$5,401 | $3,334 | $3,334 |
Canada's GQAS is supported by a strong scientific and technical base including testing of grains, processing into various end-use products, and assessing cooking quality.
The CGC has been testing grain for toxic substances since 1966 to monitor grain entering the licensed elevator system and to provide grain safety assurances to help marketers meet international buyers' requirements. The CGC is the only government agency that provides grain safety assurances on pesticides, trace elements, mycotoxins, fungi and moulds. Buyers of Canadian grain increasingly demand more rigorous, timely testing for chemical residues and trace elements on cargoes. For example, Japan has introduced a Food Sanitation Law that lists agricultural chemicals and their maximum toxic or harmful levels for all grains. Europe has established the European Food Safety Authority to regulate food safety in Europe and members of the European Union have embraced labelling and traceability of crops and food. These demands are increasing the importance of research aimed at developing new or adapting existing analytical methods.
The following scientific and technical support services are integral components of the overall delivery of an effective GQAS:
The expected result of providing technical and scientific support to the GQAS is to increase and/or maintain current marketability levels for Canadian grains. In addition, provision of this type of information and support will facilitate the optimal management of the GQAS and afford increased opportunities for various end-uses of Canadian grain (e.g. animal feed, ethanol, malting). Based on these expected results, this key program supports departmental Priorities #1 and #2.
To measure its success in delivering this key program and achieving the expected results, the CGC uses the following tools:
2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|
$4,974 | $3,071 | $3,071 |
Addressing the challenges facing Canada's GQAS and modifying the system to meet changing domestic and international requirements is vital in making significant progress towards the successful delivery of this program activity, but also contributes to the success of all of the CGC's strategic outcomes.
A broad spectrum of producers and grain industry representatives meet several times annually, through the Western and Eastern Standards Committees and commodity-specific subcommittees, to study and review grain standards, ensuring relevance and value of those standards in facilitating the movement of grain and transfer of ownership.
The following initiatives and programs are underway to address pressures on the GQAS and the visual based grading system:
The overall expected result of modifying the system to meet changing requirements is to improve technology and objective methods for determining quality in order to facilitate grain movement and enhance the marketability of Canadian grains. Given these expected results, this key program supports departmental Priority #2.
To measure its success in delivering this key program and achieving the expected results, the CGC uses the following tools:
Strategic Outcome 2: A grain quantity assurance system that addresses the changing needs of the grain industry |
2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|
$14,969 | $9,241 | $9,241 |
2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|
133 | 80 | 80 |
The Canadian grain quantity assurance system assures the weight of grain loaded into or discharged from conveyances and in storage in the licensed terminal and transfer elevator system. Daily provision of CGC grain weighing services benefits both producers and the grain industry and forms a major part of the quantity assurance system. Weighing services are supported by a strong technical base.
The challenges for the grain quantity assurance system include increased requirements for quantity information to manage grain stocks and keeping up-to-date with increasingly sophisticated weighing and transfer technology in grain elevators.
The overall expected result of delivering weighing services is to implement an improved strategy to monitor client satisfaction with the CGC weighing and dispute resolution programs.
This program activity directly supports departmental Priority #1. Delivery of weighing services and programs is an integral component of the ongoing provision of the CGC mandate. In addition, the ongoing review and development of weighing programs, procedures, and equipment contributes to enhancing the Canadian GQAS and departmental Priority #2. Addressing Priority #4 (sustainable funding) is critical in order for the CGC to fulfill its statutory mandate and maintain weighing service levels to the grain industry. ISO certification (Priority #5) of CGC quantity assurance services supports efficient and effective processes and enhances the CGC's international reputation for consistent and reliable grain shipments.
2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|
$13,546 | $8,363 | $8,363 |
The CGC delivers weighing services to meet the legislative mandate of the Canada Grain Act and the requirements of the grain industry from producers to customers. Essential weighing procedures are defined within the CGC's Quality Management System (QMS) Procedure Manual, or outlined in a QMS Work Instruction Format, and are accessed by weigh staff to ensure consistent application of procedures. CGC weighing policies and procedures are monitored and evaluated through a series of reporting policies and national discussion and review forums.
The following ongoing weighing services and programs are integral components of the overall delivery of an effective grain quantity assurance system:
The expected result of delivering weighing services for the quantity assurance system is to maintain and increase the accuracy in reporting of official weights in grain transactions in order to enhance customer satisfaction and the marketability of Canadian grain. Given this expected result, the daily provision of weighing services supports not only the ongoing delivery of the CGC mandate (Priority #1) but also supports the continued competitiveness of Canadian grains in both domestic and international markets (Priority #2). Delivering weighing services to maintain an effective Quality Management System as per ISO 9001:2000 standards directly supports departmental Priority #5.
To measure its success in delivering this key program and achieving the expected results, the CGC uses the following tools:
2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|
$1,423 | $878 | $878 |
In order to maintain relevancy and to address constantly changing industry demands, the CGC provides ongoing technical support for the quantity assurance system. Regular review of quantity assurance processes allows the CGC to adjust the service procedures as necessary through Improvement Requests (IR), and identify or adjust training requirements as needed.
The following services are integral components to this key program:
The expected result of this key program is to assist clients in accurate reporting of quantity information, through technological advancements, in order to maintain and increase the marketability of Canadian grain. Providing technical support of the quantity assurance system supports departmental Priority #1 and contributes to Priority #2.
To measure its success in delivering this key program and achieving the expected results, the CGC uses the following tools:
Strategic Outcome 3: Research and development on grain quality that enhances the marketability of Canadian grain |
2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|
$7,663 | $4,130 | $4,130 |
2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|
59 | 36 | 36 |
The Canada Grain Act requires the CGC to undertake, sponsor and promote research related to grains. The CGC conducts research directly related to supporting the GQAS that permits the effective marketing of Canadian grain in the interests of producers. The GRL researches new methods for quality, new measurement factors to determine quality, end-use applications of Canadian grain, quality of new breeders' varieties, and carries out the annual Harvest Survey. The GRL, through its research, supports the continual improvement of the GQAS.
There are major challenges confronting the CGC's research activities and the GQAS due to the changing needs of the Canadian grain industry. There is a major shift in the type of crops grown and their end-uses, increased demand for variety identification by objective non-visual methods, and concerns with GM crops. Research focus has shifted to address these issues in pulses, new types of oilseeds, variety identification, and GM crops. Research related to traditional crops, such as wheat, barley, canola and flax, is still essential, as these crops make up a significant proportion of the domestic and export markets. There is increasing emphasis on end-use functionality, especially new end-uses in the domestic industry. Grain is increasingly being sold based on specifications requiring objective non-visual testing of quality or safety factors and the provision of grain quality and safety assurances.
The expected results of conducting research to understand and measure grain quality are: adaptation of new objective methods for quality assessment and grain safety assurance; adoption and publication of new methods by current standard setting organizations; and provision of accurate quality assessment tools for new breeder lines.
This program activity directly supports departmental Priority #1 as undertaking, sponsoring and promoting grain related research upholds the mandate of the CGC and facilitates effective marketing of Canadian grain. In addition, ongoing research of new methods and measurement factors to determine quality, end-use applications of Canadian grain, and quality of new breeders' varieties supports improvement of the Canadian GQAS and departmental Priority #2. Addressing Priority #4 (sustainable funding mechanism) is critical in order for the CGC to fulfil its statutory mandate and continue ongoing research focused on understanding and measuring grain quality. During the planning period, the GRL will be assessing the applicability of ISO/IEC 17025 certification to certain processes in its laboratory testing environment in support of departmental Priority #5.
2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|
$3,448 | $1,859 | $1,859 |
Non-visual methods for the assessment of grain quality are required in order to maximize the return on investment to each segment of the Canadian grain handling system. New internationally accepted methods are necessary to capture and maintain the inherent value through all phases of the marketing system from producer to end-user.
The following ongoing research activities are integral components of this key program:
The expected result of this key program is the development of internationally recognized methods for quality evaluation of all grains in collaboration with other national and international laboratories. Based on this expected result, researching methods to measure grain quality supports departmental Priority #2.
To measure its success in developing research methods that support the grain quality assurance system, the CGC tracks:
2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|
$3,448 | $1,859 | $1,859 |
In order to remain competitive in the international marketplace, it is imperative that future grain quality attributes be anticipated and captured. As such, research that supports emerging issues in the grain quality assurance system is crucial to all segments of the Canadian grain industry.
The following ongoing research activities are integral components of this key program:
The expected result of this key program is to develop new methodologies for identifying variety composition and to enable variety specific marketing in order to meet changing producer, industry, and customer demands for specific end-use quality. Based on this expected result and the contributing programs and initiatives, researching new quality factors supports departmental Priority #2.
To measure its success in researching emerging quality factors to support the grain quality assurance system, the CGC tracks:
2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|
$767 | $412 | $412 |
Continually evolving uses of grain require that the CGC have the ability to anticipate, identify, and measure new grain specifications in order to meet changing industry needs.
The following ongoing research activities are integral components of this key program:
The expected result of this key program is to develop objective testing protocols and specifications to support the Canadian grading system and facilitate the marketing and end-use diversification of Canadian grains. Given this expected result, researching new grain standards supports departmental Priorities #1 and #2.
To measure its success in ensuring that this key program is on track the CGC monitors:
Strategic Outcome 4: Producers' rights are supported to ensure fair treatment within the grain handling system |
2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|
$3,086 | $1,861 | $1,861 |
2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|
27 | 16 | 16 |
The CGC is mandated to serve producer interests by upholding the Canada Grain Act and as a result, has implemented a number of programs and safeguards. These include the licensing and security program, producer liaison measures, producer car procedures, and a grain grade appeal system. In addition, the CGC collects and updates grain quality data and grain handling information to facilitate producer sales and marketing decisions.
The expected result of this program activity is increased producer satisfaction with the grain handling system.
Protecting producer rights directly supports departmental Priorities #1 (ongoing delivery of the CGC mandate) and Priority #3 (regulatory compliance), as the CGC is mandated to ensure the fair treatment of producers within the grain handling system. Addressing Priority #4 (sustainable CGC funding mechanism) is necessary to maintain producer satisfaction with the delivery of various procedures and systems related to their protection.
2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|
$1,263 | $762 | $762 |
The CGC licenses and regulates primary, process, transfer, and terminal elevators as well as grain dealers. Licensed elevators and grain dealers are required to post security to cover their liabilities to producers in the event of a company default. This regulatory activity contributes to the fair treatment of western Canadian producers.
The following ongoing activities are integral components of an effective licensing and financial security program:
The expected result of this key program is to decrease the level of CGC licensing non-compliance, increase the number of new grain dealers or operators that are licensed, and mitigate financial risk to producers. This key program directly supports departmental Priorities #1 and #3.
While the number of unlicensed facilities has decreased as a result of the recent licensing compliance initiative, unlicensed facilities still present an ongoing challenge to the CGC, as producers delivering to these facilities are not protected in the case of a default. During the reporting period, the CGC will continue to broaden the licensee base at the producer delivery level and will increase licensing, audit and compliance operational unit resources to address the increase in the number of licensees. To facilitate compliance, the CGC will continue to work toward improving the efficiency of administrative requirements of licensees.
In order to measure the success of its efforts in administering the licensing and financial security system, the CGC will utilize the following methods and processes:
2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|
$122 | $74 | $74 |
The CGC allocates producer cars for producers and producer groups that wish to ship their own grain. http://grainscanada.gc.ca/prodser/producercars/information/prodcars-e.htm
The CGC will continue to work with the Canadian Wheat Board and the railways to develop and implement strategies to address producer car issues, including the increasing demand from producers for railcar allocations.
The expected results of this key program are, pursuant to the Canada Grain Act and Canada Grain Regulations, to provide and make available an alternate grain delivery mechanism and respond to producer car allocation challenges. Managing the allocation of railcars for individual requests contributes to departmental Priority #1.
In order to measure the success of its efforts in managing the allocation of railcars for individual producer requests, the CGC will utilize the following methods and processes:
2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|
$1,590 | $958 | $958 |
To safeguard fair and equitable grain transactions for producers, the CGC has set up an information and compliance network. Inspection, weighing, and arbitration services are essential to the efficient and fair operation of grain markets for producers and the grain industry. Grades allow buyers to identify end-use characteristics without the need for end-use tests or direct examination of individual grain lots. This helps to ensure that producers are properly compensated for the quality and quantity of grain delivered and shipped.
The following ongoing activities are integral components of this key service:
The expected result of this key service is to successfully resolve complaints and facilitate settlements acceptable to those parties involved, while improving the ability of producers to manage their business risks. Based on this expected result, fair treatment of producers by grain companies and dealers directly supports both departmental Priority #1 and #3.
In order to measure the success of its efforts in facilitating fair treatment of producers by grain companies and dealers, the CGC will utilize the following methods and processes:
2007-2008 | 2008-2009 | 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|
$111 | $67 | $67 |
The CGC continually collects and updates grain quality data and grain handling information and makes it available to producers and other interested parties. This information and technical support facilitates producer sales and marketing decisions.
The following ongoing activities are integral components of this key service:
The expected result of this key service is the provision of accurate and relevant technical and statistical information to support producer sales and marketing decisions. As such, this key service supports departmental Priority #1.
In order to measure the success of its efforts in providing grain quality information to producers, the CGC will utilize the following methods and processes:
The CGC and the GQAS is integral to the functioning of Canada's grain industry. In our role as a neutral, third party regulator and arbiter, the CGC works in partnership with virtually every participant in the industry.
Key partners | Areas of cooperation |
---|---|
Industry | |
Producers and producers' organizations Grain Dealers and Elevators Railways Processors Universities Plant Breeders Canola Council of Canada Flax Council of Canada Pulse Canada Instrument Manufacturing Companies Canadian Wheat Board Canadian International Grains Institute Canadian Seed Institute Canadian Soybean Exporters Association Grain Exporters Ontario Wheat Producers' Marketing Board |
Setting grain quality standards Operation of the grain quality and quantity assurance system Provide grain shipment and unload data interchange Dispute resolution for quality and quantity issues Development and implementation of policies and regulations Sharing market information Market development and support Research and technology transfer Auditing and certifying industry IP systems |
Portfolio departments and agencies | |
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Canadian Food Inspection Agency Canadian Dairy Commission Farm Credit Canada National Farm Products Council |
Grain data co-ordination Sharing knowledge/expert opinion Research Strategic planning Meeting international tolerances for toxic contaminants in grain Shared quality and quantity assurance program delivery |
Other government departments | |
International Trade Canada Statistics Canada Industry Canada Health Canada Canada Border Services Agency Transport Canada Justice Canada |
Sharing knowledge and expert opinion Facilitating international trade Publication of grain statistics Market development and support Grain shipment and unload data interchange Inspection and certification of licensed terminal and transfer elevator scales Regulation of grain imports |
Foreign | |
U.S. Department of Agriculture (Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration) Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (Japan) Ministry of Commerce, Economic Control and Fraud Prevention Branch (Algeria) Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (Australia) State Administration of Grain (China) |
Shared knowledge and expert opinion Shared quality assurance program delivery Facilitating international trade Research Technology training |
($ thousands) | Forecast spending 2006-2007 |
Planned spending 2007-2008 |
Planned spending 2008-2009* |
Planned spending 2009-2010* |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
Deliver inspection and testing services1 | 49,363 | 50,279 | 31,040 | 31,040 |
Deliver weighing services1 | 15,996 | 14,969 | 9,241 | 9,241 |
Conduct research to understand and measure grain quality | 9,171 | 7,663 | 4,130 | 4,130 |
Protect producer's rights1 | 2,208 | 3,086 | 1,861 | 1,861 |
|
||||
Budgetary main estimates (gross) | 76,738 | 75,997 | 46,272 | 46,272 |
Non-budgetary main estimates (gross) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Less: respendable revenue | 41,516 | 41,265 | 41,265 | 41,265 |
|
||||
Total main estimates | 35,222 | 34,732 | 5,007 | 5,007 |
|
||||
Adjustments2 | ||||
Additional Funding3 | 0 | 155 | 30,000 | 0 |
ERC Procurement Savings4 | (20) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Governor General Warrants | (4,488) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Carry Forward | 272 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
||||
Total Adjustments | (4,236) | 155 | 30,000 | 0 |
|
||||
Total planned spending | 30,986 | 34,887 | 35,007 | 5,007 |
|
||||
|
||||
Total planned spending | 30,986 | 34,887 | 35,007 | 5,007 |
Less: non-respendable revenue | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Plus: cost of services received without charge | 1,733 | 1,678 | 390 | 381 |
|
||||
Net cost of program | 32,719 | 36,565 | 35,397 | 5,388 |
|
||||
|
||||
Full time equivalents | 664 | 664 | 664 | 403 |
|
*Note: These resources are the currently approved funding levels based on the CGC’s Annual Reference Level Update (ARLU) report. The CGC has received additional appropriation revenue over the past several years to maintain its resource levels. In 2007-2008 the CGC received $30 million appropriation in addition to its annual appropriation of $5 million. Planned spending for 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 includes only the annual appropriation of $5 million resulting in a reporting variance between years.
1 Includes Canadian Grain Commission (CGC) revolving fund activities.
2 Adjustments accommodate approvals obtained since Main Estimates and include items such as Budget Initiatives, Supplementary Estimates and Governor General Warrants.
3Additional funding includes $155K and $30 million in appropriation that has been allocated for 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 respectively. These appropriations are not included in the total main estimates line as they were not approved at the time of the CGC’s ARLU report.
4 ERC planned savings (-$20K) for 2006-2007. ERC planned savings for 2007-2008 are included in the total planned spending.
These resources are based on currently approved funding levels. The CGC has received additional appropriation revenue over the past several years to maintain its resource levels. In 2007-2008 the CGC received $30 million appropriation in addition to its annual appropriation of $5 million. Planned spending for 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 includes only the annual appropriation of $5 million resulting in a reporting variance between years.
Vote or statutory item | Canadian Grain Commission | 2007-2008 Main estimates ($000's) |
2006-2007 Main estimates ($000's) |
---|---|---|---|
40 | Program expenditures | 30,940 | 24,666 |
(S) | Canadian Grain Commission Revolving Fund | (127) | (127) |
(S) | Contributions to employee benefit plans | 3,919 | 10,683 |
Total department | 34,732 | 35,222 |
The Voted and Statutory items reflect the Canadian Grain Commission (CGC) comparison of approved funding from year to year. The 2006-2007 Main Estimates include an allocation error between Vote 40 Program Expenditures and statutory (S) Contributions to Employee Benefit Plans with a nil effect on the total department dollars.
($ thousands) | 2007-2008 |
---|---|
Contributions covering employers' share of employees' insurance premiums and expenditures paid by Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (excluding revolving funds) | 1,483 |
Worker's compensation coverage provided by Social Development Canada | 195 |
Total 2007-2008 services received without charge | 1,678 |
This table represents all services provided and paid by other government departments on behalf of the Canadian Grain Commission (CGC).
($ thousands) | Forecast spending 2006-2007 |
Planned spending 2007-2008 |
Planned spending 2008-2009 |
Planned spending 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
Deliver inspection and testing services1 | 2,660 | 3,181 | 1,920 | 1,920 |
Deliver weighing services1 | 863 | 946 | 572 | 572 |
Conduct research to understand and measure grain quality | 661 | 609 | 379 | 379 |
Protect producer's rights1 | 131 | 209 | 129 | 129 |
|
||||
Total | 4,315 | 4,945 | 3,000 | 3,000 |
|
1 Includes Canadian Grain Commission (CGC) Revolving Fund activities.
($ thousands) | Forecast revenue 2006-2007 |
Planned revenue 2007-2008 |
Planned revenue 2008-2009 |
Planned revenue 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
Deliver inspection and testing services (RF)1 | 31,324 | 31,135 | 31,135 | 31,135 |
Deliver weighing services (RF)1 | 9,326 | 9,270 | 9,270 | 9,270 |
Protect producers' rights (RF)1 | 866 | 860 | 860 | 860 |
|
||||
Total Respendable Revenue | 41,516 | 41,265 | 41,265 | 41,265 |
|
1 (RF) represents Revolving Fund activities.
This table identifies all sources of respendable revenue generated.
($ thousands) | Forecast 2006-2007 |
Planned 2007-2008 |
Planned 2008-2009 |
Planned 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
Respendable Revenue | 41,516 | 41,265 | 41,265 | 41,265 |
|
||||
Expenses | ||||
Operating: | ||||
Salaries and employee benefits | 31,900 | 31,649 | 31,649 | 31,649 |
Depreciation | 1,411 | 1,701 | 1,701 | 1,701 |
Repairs and maintenance | 465 | 318 | 318 | 318 |
Administrative and support services | 4,691 | 5,784 | 5,784 | 5,784 |
Utilities, materials and supplies | 1,971 | 1,084 | 1,084 | 1,084 |
Marketing | 135 | 76 | 76 | 76 |
|
||||
Total Expenses | 40,573 | 40,612 | 40,612 | 40,612 |
|
||||
Surplus (Deficit) | 943 | 653 | 653 | 653 |
|
This table portrays and allocates the costs associated with the Respendable Revenue generated through fees and contracts.
($ thousands) | Forecast 2006-2007 |
Planned 2007-2008 |
Planned 2008-2009 |
Planned 2009-2010 |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
Surplus (Deficit) | 943 | 653 | 653 | 653 |
|
||||
Add non-cash items: | ||||
Depreciation/amortization | 1,411 | 1,701 | 1,701 | 1,701 |
Investing activities: | ||||
Acquisition of depreciable assets | (2,227) | (2,227) | (2 227) | (2 227) |
|
||||
Cash surplus (requirement) | 127 | 127 | 127 | 127 |
|
This table converts the financial statement information from book value to a cash basis.
($ thousands) | Forecast 2006-2007 |
Planned 2007-2008 |
Planned 2008-2009 |
Planned 2009-2010 |
|
||||
Authority | 2,508 | 2,508 | 2,508 | 2,508 |
Drawdown: | ||||
Balance as at April 1 | 8,296 | 127 | 254 | 381 |
Operating (deficit)/surplus | (8,296) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Projected surplus (Drawdown) | 127 | 127 | 127 | 127 |
|
||||
127 | 254 | 381 | 508 | |
|
||||
Projected Balance at March 31 | 2,635 | 2,762 | 2,889 | 3,016 |
|
This table represents the projected surplus (drawdown), which is made up of the ANCAFA (cash basis) plus a $2 million line of credit for revolving fund activities only.
CGC corporate infrastructure includes support functions such as management of human resources, information technology, statistical services, legal counsel, communications, finance, policy and planning, administration, health and safety, and project management. These functions enable the CGC to deliver the activities necessary to achieve its strategic outcomes and result in improved performance, increased employee productivity and effective communication with industry and producers. Success will be measured by evaluating the effectiveness of specific activities and using measurement tools for specific programs such as competent staff, number of accidents, meeting legislative requirements, and efficiency gains due to well-developed information technology.
Although the CGC is a small department with limited resources, it prides itself on the ability to implement government-wide initiatives. Sound agency management denotes not only cost efficiency, but signifies the CGC's commitment to government-wide initiatives such as the Management Accountability Framework, providing services in both official languages, the Government On Line (GOL) initiative, and effective partnering with other government organizations to provide effective, efficient service to Canadians. Success in this area will be measured by tracking specific activities undertaken to achieve the goals of various government-wide initiatives and measuring program, unit, and individual performance against performance targets.
The CGC is committed to fulfilling its mandate in the most efficient and cost effective manner possible. The costs of both corporate infrastructure and implementation of government-wide initiatives are accounted for in the costs of delivering the CGC strategic outcomes and program activities. The following provides a description of internal and government-wide CGC initiatives and activities.
A skilled and motivated workforce is critical to the CGC in delivering its services to Canadians. The CGC is committed to providing an inclusive and diverse workplace that is representative of the citizens and communities served. The following activities and initiatives are integral components to the management of human resources in the planning period:
The expected results of these planned activities include: