Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Symbol of the Government of Canada

ARCHIVED - RPP 2007-2008
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency


Warning This page has been archived.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.


Section 3 – Supplementary Information

3.1 Organizational Information

The reporting structure to the Minister of the Environment is shown in the figure below.
Planned Spending: $16,540K with 155 FTEs

Figure 3.1, Organizational Information

3.2 Agency link to the Government of Canada Outcomes


2007-2008
Strategic Outcome:  Environmental assessment is an integral part of program and policy decision-making
($ thousands)
Program Activity
Budgetary
Non-Budgetary
Operating
Capital
Grants and Contributions
Gross
Respendable Revenue
Net
Loans, Investments and Advances
Total Main Estimates
Adjustments (planned spending not in Main Estimates)
Total Planned Spending
Effective and Efficient Environmental Assessment
17,598
-
2,443
20,041
(3,501)
16,540
-
16,540
-
16,540
Total
17,598
-
2,443
20,041
(3,501)
16,540
-
16,540
-
16,540

Table 1: Departmental Planned Spending and Full-Time Equivalents


($ thousands)
Forecast Spending
2006-2007
Planned Spending
2007-2008
Planned Spending
2008-2009
Planned Spending
2009-2010
Efficient and Effective Environmental Assessment
20,884
20,041
19,541
19,400
Less Respendable revenue
(3,501)
(3,501)
(3,501)
(3,501)
Total Main Estimates
17,383
16,540
16,040
15,899
Adjustments:
Supplementary Estimates
 
 
 
 

Carry Forward of 2005-2006 Eligible Lapsing Funds

430
 
 
 

Northern Energy Development – transfer from Natural Resources Canada for the Participant Funding

167
 
 
 

Northern Energy Development – transfer from Environment Canada for the Participant Funding

650
 
 
 

Re-profiling of funds to 2006-2007 for the Participant Funding

37
 
 
 

Transfer from Environment Canada for compensation for collective bargaining

169
 
 
 
Compensation for Collective Agreements
(500)
 
 
 
Re-profiling of funds to 2007-2008 for the Participant Funding
 
 
 
 
Total Adjustments
1,120
0
0
0
Total Planned Spending (note)
18,503
16,540
16,040
15,899
 
 
 
 
 
Total Planned Spending
18,503
16,540
16,040
15,899
Plus: Cost of services received without charge
3,264
3,316
3,365
3,416
Net Cost of Program
21,767
19,856
19,405
19,315
 
 
 
 
 
Full-Time Equivalents
157
155
155
155

Note: The funding decrease in Total Planned Spending over the planning horizon is mainly explained by reduced funding for initiatives such as Sydney Tar Ponds and Northern Gas Pipeline Project as well as the British Columbia Treaty Negotiation Process sunsetting in 2008-09.

Table 2: Voted and Statutory Items Listed in Main Estimates


2007-2008
Vote or Statutory Item Truncated Vote or Statutory Wording
Current
Main Estimates
($ thousands)
Previous
Main Estimates
($ thousands)
15
Program expenditures
14,844
15,609
(S)
Contributions to employee benefit plans
  1,696
  1,774
 
Total Agency
  16,540
  17,383

Table 3: Services Received Without Charge


($ thousands)
2007-2008
Accommodation provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC)
1,660
Contributions covering employers’ share of employees’ insurance premiums and expenditures paid by the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (excluding revolving funds); Employer’s contribution to employees’ insured benefits plans and expenditures paid by TBS
642
Salary and associated expenditures of legal services provided by Justice Canada
1,014
2007-2008 Services Received Without Charge
3,316

Note:  The Agency obtains certain financial, material management, informatics as well as compensation and benefits services under a shared services agreement with Environment Canada.


Table 4: Sources of Respendable Revenue


($ thousands)
Forecast Revenue
2006-2007
Planned Revenue 2007-2008
Planned Revenue
2008-2009
Planned Revenue
2009-2010
Effective and Efficient Environmental Assessment
Cost recovery for environmental assessment services
7,295
3,351
3,351
3,351
Cost recovery for publications, training and education materials (federal)
103
75
75
75
Cost recovery for publications, training and education materials (external)
175
75
75
75
Total Respendable Revenue
7,570
3,501
3,501
3,501

Note: The revenue derived from recovery of environmental assessments review panel costs is dependent on the level of panel activity that is eligible for cost recovery and may therefore fluctuate.

Table 5: User Fees


Name of User Fee
Fee Type
Fee-setting
Authority
Reason for Planned
Amendment to Fee
Effective Date of
Planned Change
Consultation and Review Process Planned
  • Amendments to the Environmental Assessment Review Panel Service Charges Order
  • Regulatory Service
  • Financial Administration Act
  • Update to reflect current costs and range of services provided
  • 2008/ 2009
  • The proposed amendments will be discussed with the Minister of the Environments multi-stakeholder advisory committee. 
  • A consultation document will then be used for broader stakeholder consultations.  

Table 6: Major Regulatory Initiatives

The following table outlines the Agency’s major and significant regulatory initiatives scheduled for submission for legal examination, approval or for implementation during the planning period.


REGULATORY INITIATIVES
EXPECTED RESULTS

Amendments to the Exclusion List Regulations:

New entries will be added to these regulations to prescribe new classes of projects to be excluded from environmental assessment and to modify thresholds of certain existing entries.

  • Reductions in the number of environmental assessments conducted by federal responsible authorities for projects having insignificant effects, particularly with regard to screening assessments.
  • More efficient and effective use of environmental assessment resources.


Amendments to Federal Coordination Regulations:

Federal Coordination Regulations will be amended to take into account changes brought about in 2003 by the renewed Act.

  • Increased coordination among federal departments in fulfilling environmental assessment requirements and improved coordination with other participants in the environmental assessment process, including provinces, industry, environmental organizations and others.
  • A more timely and predictable environmental assessment process.

Amendments to Canada Port Authority Environmental Assessment Regulations:

In accordance with changes brought about by the renewed Act in 2003, amendments to these regulations are needed to ensure the comprehensiveness, consistency, transparency and overall quality of port authorities’ environmental assessment processes.

  • Environmental assessment procedures for port authorities will be consistent with provisions of the amended Act particularly with regard to comprehensive studies and the Registry.

Airport Authority Regulations:

In accordance with changes brought about by the renewed Act, these regulations will close a gap in the Act by requiring airport authorities to conduct an assessment of the environmental effects of projects located on the federal land over which those authorities have administration, management or other specified rights or interests.

  • An environmental assessment process that captures all appropriate airport authority activities for assessment.

Environmental Assessment Review Panel Service Charges Order

The Order will be updated to reflect the current costs of providing review panel services and the range of services provided, as well as to incorporate an inflation factor.  

  • A more sustainable cost recovery system.

Table 7: Sustainable Development Strategy


1. SDS Departmental Goal:

To promote the full and meaningful application of a results-oriented federal environmental assessment framework.

2. Federal SD Goal including GGO goals

Governance for Sustainable Development: "Federal SD
Goal VI."

3. Performance Measure from current SDS

Improved understanding of how the various components of an effective and efficient environmental assessment framework should work together, and of the strengths and weaknesses of the current framework in supporting integrated decision making.

A timelier, coordinated, and consistent approach to the environmental assessment process of major projects is applied.

Improved knowledge across government of how to engage the public, including Aboriginal peoples, in high-quality environmental assessments.

Regular and consistent training in sustainable development tools for planners and analysts across the government of Canada.

Identification of areas requiring improvement in the application of the Cabinet Directive and the Act.

Identification of opportunities to better integrate the project review process across jurisdictions.

Themes of research and development reflect issues and needs addressed in the Agency’s sustainable development strategies.

4. Department’s Expected Results for 2007-08

Advance the science and practice of strategic environmental assessment.

Promote, and ensure the implementation of initiatives that improve the coordination among stakeholders in federal project environmental assessments.

Gain a greater understanding of the effectiveness of the Agency and its supporting legislative and policy tools in achieving coordination among stakeholders.

Build knowledge and capacity internally and throughout the federal government in the area of public and Aboriginal peoples’ engagement in environmental assessments.

Collaborate with other federal departments and agencies to increase awareness and application of the principles of sustainable development and the sustainable development tools.

Evaluate the effectiveness of the SEA and project environmental assessment processes.

Examine how the Agency can move toward better integration of the project review process at the national level.

Ensure that the research areas promoted and encouraged by the Agency are consistent with, and supportive of, the goals and objectives set out in the Agency’s sustainable development strategies.



Table 8: Internal Audits and Evaluations


1. Name of Internal Audit/Evaluation
2. Audit Type / Evaluation Type
3. Status
4. Expected Completion Date
5. Electronic Link to Report
Evaluation of the Brunswick substitution pilot
 
Preparatory work done
Spring 2007
 
Participant Funding Program client satisfaction survey
 
 
Late 2007