This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
Part II Inside the Reintegrated Department
Part III The Department's Foreign Affairs Component
Part IV The Department's International Trade Component
In February 2006, with the election of a new government, the two components of the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade were reintegrated. The purpose was to ensure a coherent approach to foreign affairs and international commerce and to better coordinate the provision of services to Canadians at home and abroad.
In the newly reintegrated department, the Ministers of Foreign Affairs and International Trade are supported by their respective divisions.
The department's two components carry out distinct but complementary roles. The foreign affairs element develops and implements strategies to advance the Government of Canada's global agenda, while promoting Canadian values, culture and expertise worldwide. The trade component positions Canada as a world business leader by helping Canadian companies expand and succeed internationally, promoting Canada as a dynamic place to do business, and negotiating and administering trade agreements. See Part II, section 2.1.3 for detailed information on the governance and accountability structures of the reintegrated department.
Consistent with the department's reintegration, this Report on Plans and Priorities includes both its components-foreign affairs and international trade-under one cover. The information contained in this report is presented in a logical and user-friendly manner.
First, the two ministers outline the department's overall direction and priorities for the year ahead in the Ministers' message. This is followed by a joint Management Representation Statement from the two Deputy Ministers, in accordance with requirements of Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. Thereafter, the report outlines the major elements of the department's governance, structure and mechanics, introducing the department to those readers who may not be familiar with how it works, while updating this information for those who are more conversant with its operations. This part of the document is particularly important this year, given the department's recent reintegration.
The report then offers more details on the specific plans and priorities of each of the two components, presented in two separate sections (Part III for foreign affairs and Part IV for international trade). The purpose of this approach is to enable readers to pinpoint directly those specific issues and initiatives in which they are interested. Both Parts III and IV of this report contain the following information, as it relates to the component under discussion:
At the end of the report (Part V), readers will find contact information, a glossary of frequently used acronyms and an index.
This Report on Plans and Priorities reflects the department's new structure, processes and corporate culture. In preparing it, the department has taken care to demonstrate its commitment to Treasury Board principles of effective reporting to Canadians (see http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/20062007/p304-eng.asp). As a result, the department is confident that this report delivers credible information on its plans and performance measurement systems in keeping with the MRRS-PAA, while demonstrating value for money and sound management and providing a foundation for dialogue between the government and Canadians.
The Honourable David Emerson Minister for International Trade |
The Honourable Peter G. MacKay Minister of Foreign Affairs |
As the two ministers of the newly reintegrated Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, we present the 2006-2007 Report on Plans and Priorities with particular pleasure and enthusiasm.
Reintegrating the department's two components (foreign affairs and international trade) formalizes a relationship that has always been highly collaborative. It also enables us to take full advantage of the synergies generated by carrying out our distinct but highly complementary roles. A department that operates as effectively as possible will enhance our ability to provide government-wide leadership in developing and coordinating Canada's international policies in political as well as economic spheres.
The Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade delivers on Canada's international agenda by carrying out four key functions: leading and coordinating international policy making for the Government of Canada; promoting Canadian interests, values and expertise abroad; assisting Canadian business and the public by providing trade, investment, consular and passport services; and supplying the physical platform outside Canada that enables the global operations of the entire federal government and the provincial governments. The department's services are available at 299 locations worldwide.
In fact, the primary focus of this department has always been-and will continue to be-the services and benefits that Canadians need at the level of quality they expect. As productive members of the international community, Canadians care about events outside this country's borders and want the federal government to help effect positive change on the world stage. Canadians also recognize that international commerce is central to maintaining the country's economic prosperity and vitality. This department is an enabler in this way, too, by helping Canadian business to compete on an even playing field and succeed in ever more competitive markets around the world.
We have taken full account of these realities in identifying the following issues on which the department will focus over the planning period.
Foreign Affairs
As the government noted in the April 2006 Speech from the Throne, it is determined to show Canadian leadership on the world stage, advance our values around the world and continue Canada's proud heritage as a leader in fighting tyranny and injustice. To this end, Canada will continue to work with friends and allies around the world to promote democracy, human rights and freer trade.
As the government's lead organization for development and coordination of international policy, this department will be at the centre of these efforts.
The department will advance Canada's vital foreign policy and commercial interests with the United States and expand cooperation with North American partners, while reaffirming Canada's interests in the Caribbean and the wider hemisphere.
On security issues, it will work to achieve progress on counterterrorism and the threat of nuclear proliferation, collaborating with global partners in key multilateral organizations like the G8 (made up of the United States, France, the United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, Italy, Russia and Canada, as well as the European Union).
The department will continue to press forward the momentum for reforming the United Nations (UN) to make it more effective and accountable in addressing global issues and problems. It will build strong partnerships with new economic powers such as Brazil, Russia, India and China, and reinvigorate relations with established economies such as Japan and the European Union (EU) in order to expand economic opportunities for Canadians. And, it will provide continued support for African development, lasting peace in Sudan and the Middle East, and reconstruction and democratization in Afghanistan and Haiti.
International Trade
The important contribution of international commerce to Canada's prosperity cannot be overstated. In order to secure an ongoing level of prosperity that fully supports our future national economic and social requirements, the department will develop a global commerce strategy that takes full advantage of globalization. This multi-faceted strategy will set out the government's role in supporting Canadian business to achieve success in the international marketplace. It will recognize the competitive factors facing Canada around the globe and propose strategic policy instruments and tools to ensure that Canadian companies have the support they need to compete equitably. Enhancing and securing access to global markets, positioning Canada for commercial success-including its attractiveness as an investment location-and working closely with the business sector will be key contributors to assured prosperity.
Without secure access to foreign markets, no degree of marketing effort can succeed. Therefore, the department will strengthen Canadian access to global markets through negotiation and implementation of commercial agreements such as the free trade accords under negotiation with South Korea and other key markets in Asia and elsewhere. It will also pursue negotiations toward foreign investment protection and promotion agreements (FIPAs) with China, India and Peru and negotiations of bilateral air agreements, where necessary, to facilitate international commerce.
Positioning Canada for commercial success will be paramount to capitalize on the door-opening results of enhanced market access. The approach will be dynamic and aggressive, yet pragmatic. It will highlight our sectoral strengths, including in research and development capabilities, and aim to derive more and better results from the commercialization of Canadian technologies. With regard to foreign investment, the department will step up its efforts to more closely highlight the characteristics sought by current and prospective foreign investors. Our ability to portray Canada as an advantageous location and to partner for international investment, innovation and value-added production is central to generating jobs and prosperity.
To help Canadian business compete successfully in all international markets, the department will provide strengthened assistance through the Trade Commissioner Service. Working with clients, stakeholders and partners, it will connect increasing numbers of competitive companies across Canada with global market opportunities through our Regional Offices, our information and market intelligence systems and our officers in missions abroad, ensuring competitiveness for those involved in international commerce. The department will work to increase awareness among the department's trade-related stakeholders of both the opportunities and challenges involved in global commerce.
The department continued to work actively to resolve the long-standing softwood lumber dispute with the United States. Our general approach continued to be to seek a negotiated settlement while pursuing litigation before World Trade Organization and NAFTA panels and American courts. Negotiations in early 2006 led to an April 27, 2006 agreement in principle between Canada and the United States to resolve the dispute and provide Canadian industry with a stable and predictable environment in which to operate and invest. Further negotiations then took place to develop the legal text. Minister Emerson and American Trade Representative Susan Schwab initialed the softwood lumber agreement on July 1, 2006. On August 22, 2006, Prime Minister Harper confirmed that, since a clear majority of the lumber industry and the key lumber-producing provinces supported the agreement, the government would table legislation in Parliament in order to bring the agreement into force in autumn, 2006. Canadian officials will continue to consult regularly with provincial officials and with industry in implementing the agreement.
Department-Wide
Internally, the department will continue its evolution from an organization that is primarily policy-oriented to one with a greater involvement in program and project design. And, it will further enhance operational efficiency and employee skills development, which will improve the department's ability to realize its other objectives.
In carrying out this work, the department contributes to a number of government-wide objectives. First, it helps ensure that Canada's foreign policy reflects true Canadian values and advances Canada's national interests. Second, it seeks to strengthen rules-based trading arrangements and to expand free and fair market access at bilateral, regional and global levels. Third, it works with a range of partners inside and outside government to achieve increased economic opportunity and enhanced security for Canada and for Canadians at home and abroad.
In putting forward our comprehensive agenda for the planning period, we are keenly aware that the department's past accomplishments and future successes are made possible by the staunch sense of purpose demonstrated on a daily basis by its employees. We take this opportunity to recognize their considerable contribution in advancing Canadian foreign policy and economic interests in the challenging, complex and competitive international arena. The following pages of this report provide evidence of the benefits they bring to Canadians.
Readers are also invited to consult the department's website (http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/) for additional information on international developments and the department's activities.
Marie-Lucie Morin Deputy Minister for International Trade |
V. Peter Harder Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs |
We submit, for tabling in Parliament, the 2006-2007 Report on Plans and Priorities for the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade. This document has been prepared based on the reporting principles contained in the Guide for the Preparation of Part III of the 2006-2007 Estimates: Report on Plans and Priorities and Departmental Performance Report, issued by Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, as follows:
The department's mandate as it pertains to foreign affairs is to:
The department's mandate as it pertains to international commerce is the advancement of Canada's economic interests abroad through the:
With respect to the department's management of Canada's missions abroad, it is important to recognize the spread and complexity of this responsibility. This country has a formal presence in 159 of the world's 192 independent states. Outside Canada, there are 299 locations at which the services of the federal government can be accessed. The number of points of service in each country or other entity depends on the breadth of its bilateral relationship with Canada. For instance, there are more points of service in the United States than in any other country, underscoring the significance of Canada's relations with that nation.
The department also serves the foreign diplomatic community accredited to Canada (173 foreign diplomatic missions, 126 of which are in Ottawa and 47 of which are in either New York City or Washington, D.C., 525 foreign consular posts and nearly 20 international organizations and other offices). At present, there are approximately 8,000 foreign representatives and accredited members of their families in Canada.
The department delivers a number of value-added services to Canadians pertaining to foreign affairs and international commerce.
Foreign Affairs: First, the department leads and coordinates a government-wide approach to the pursuit of Canada's global agenda, while promoting Canadian values and culture internationally. Second, it analyzes national and international trends and developments for Canadians, providing timely and practical information on global issues and travel. Third, it manages Canada's network of missions worldwide, delivering cost-effective and efficient services and infrastructure to enable the international operations of the Government of Canada as well as other partners co-located at those missions (see Part II, section 2.1.3.4 and Part III, sections 3.2.1.4 and 3.2.2 for more information about Canada's missions). Finally, it provides passport and consular services to Canadians, enabling their participation in the international community.
International Trade: Much of the department's commerce-related work involves the provision of wide-ranging services to Canadian business. This includes opening and expanding markets through negotiated agreements and facilitating export and investment transactions. The benefits of this work are reaped by Canadian companies and, by extension, the entire Canadian economy.
The expansion of global commerce, including two-way trade and investment, generates employment and business opportunities for Canadians at home and abroad. A strengthened Canadian economy, built on open flows of trade, investment and technology, enables both federal and provincial governments to provide Canadians with the social and other programs that they desire. Furthermore, trade liberalization is a significant contributor to the Government of Canada's innovation agenda. Opening new markets for Canadian firms stimulates investment that can raise productivity by generating new ideas and technologies, while foreign investment in this country helps to transfer technology and know-how to Canadians.
These benefits that the department provides to Canadians are incorporated into its Management, Resources and Results Structure-Program Activity Architecture (MRRS-PAA) (see Part II, section 2.1.3.9 for more information on the MRRS-PAA).
The Minister of Foreign Affairs, Peter MacKay, and the Minister for International Trade, David Emerson, are accountable to Parliament for the management and oversight of the department.
Mr. MacKay is supported by Josée Verner, Minister for International Cooperation, La Francophonie and Official Languages, who is responsible for the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA). Mr. MacKay's Parliamentary Secretaries are Deepak Obhrai and Peter Van Loan. The Foreign Affairs Minister is the chair of the Cabinet Committee on Foreign Affairs and National Security and a member of the Cabinet Committee on Priorities and Planning. Mr. Emerson is assisted by his Parliamentary Secretary, Helena Guergis. He is the vice-chair of the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs.
The Deputy Ministers of Foreign Affairs and International Trade support the Ministers in determining the overall direction of the department. The Deputy Ministers and Associate Deputy Minister are responsible for the department's strategic outcomes and related program activities.
Within the foreign affairs component of the department, two bureaus (Communications and Executive Services) report directly to the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, while the Office of the Inspector General and Passport Canada report to the Associate Deputy Minister.
Below the levels of Deputy Minister and Associate Deputy Minister, the department's foreign affairs component has a Legal Adviser and seven Assistant Deputy Ministers (ADM). These ADMs develop policies and initiatives to achieve the department's worldwide objectives. In so doing, they are accountable for the main departmental programs and the performance of their respective branches.
Within the international trade component, a Senior Adviser reports directly to that Deputy Minister. Also reporting to the Deputy Minister for International Trade are three ADMs responsible for each of the three branches (Global Operations; Investment, Innovation and Sectors; and Trade Policy and Negotiations). The Chief Air Negotiator reports jointly to the Deputy Ministers of International Trade and Transport and conducts negotiations that are vital to Canada's air carriers, airport communities, tourists, business travellers, investors and shippers.
Accountability below the ADM level throughout the department is governed by the Management, Resources and Results Structure-Program Activity Architecture. Accordingly, all of the department's branches contribute to achieving the strategic outcomes identified in the MRRS-PAA as follows:
In keeping with the reintegration of the department, the following central functions report jointly to both Deputy Ministers: Corporate Services, Human Resources, the Strategic Policy and Planning Branch, and the Protocol Office. Corporate Services and Human Resources provide essential infrastructure to the whole department. The core functions of the two branches, including finance, information technology, property management, administration and human resources services, support all departmental strategic outcomes. As a global player, the department requires a highly robust and secure information technology infrastructure and related support in order to provide the services and results Canadians expect. The department also continues to lead enhancement of the international gateway (http://canadainternational.gc.ca/ci/main_menu-e.aspx) on the main Government of Canada website.
The work of the Strategic Policy and Planning Branch ensures that the international economic dimension is appropriately reflected in Canada's foreign policy. The branch undertakes research on and analysis of cross-cutting international issues, including broad economic questions with implications for Canada's foreign policy. Through the work of the department's Policy Committee, the branch sets annual policy priorities to guide corporate planning and alignment of resource allocation. The branch also identifies gaps in Canada's international policies and carries out policy planning and development to address them. And, it explores the implications of new global trends and issues with other foreign ministries to identify ways in which Canada can collaborate with other countries on emerging policy issues, including those of economic importance.
The two geographic branches-North America, which concentrates on the United States and Mexico, and Bilateral Relations, which covers the rest of the world-manage and coordinate Canada's relations with their designated part of the world, providing resources and guidance to Canada's missions on all aspects of foreign policy, international trade and consular services. They provide policy advice to Ministers and, at missions abroad, manage all of the department's program activities as well as the initiatives of other federal departments and agencies co-located there.
The Legal Adviser is the principal source of legal services and advice to the Government of Canada on international issues.
The Office of the Inspector General is central to the department's commitment to provide Canadian taxpayers with services and benefits of real value by:
All audits of programs at Headquarters and missions abroad are conducted using risk-based assessment methods.
Within the department are two special operating agencies: Passport Canada and the Physical Resources Bureau. Passport Canada operates much like a private-sector enterprise, financing its operations entirely from the fees charged for passports and other travel documents. It also maintains a revolving fund that allows it to carry over surpluses and deficits. The Physical Resources Bureau is responsible for the cost-effective acquisition, management, development and disposal of real property and materiel required to support program delivery abroad. The department manages over 2,000 properties abroad (chanceries, official residences and staff quarters), valued at approximately $2 billion.
The following committees and groups guide corporate decision making for the department as a whole (i.e. for both the foreign affairs and international trade components):
These committees make up the formal decision-making structure of the department. However, certain issues cannot always be addressed within the time frames of this structure. As a result, like any other organization, the department also makes use of informal networks of governance. Both formal and informal means of decision making are necessary to deal with the complexity and volatility of the international environment in which the department operates. By carrying out decision making in this manner, the department increases its organizational agility in addressing unforeseen and/or rapidly changing issues and events such as the December 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami.
The international trade component of the department has the Strategic Directions Committee, which provides the challenge function for policy and program initiatives prior to their consideration by Executive Committee. Chaired by the DG of Policy and Consultations, this committee is attended by all trade and other relevant DGs as well as representatives of Export Development Canada and the Canadian Commercial Corporation (see Part II, section 2.1.3.5 for more information on these two organizations).
The department's Foreign Service employees fall into three categories: political/economic officers, management/consular officers and trade commissioners, all of which are rotational, relocating regularly between Headquarters and Canada's missions abroad. Trade commissioners also serve at regional offices across Canada.
Political/economic officers focus on shaping Canada's policies on a wide range of issues, such as international human rights, the environment, disarmament and the Middle East Peace Process. These officers typically spend a considerable amount of time working with their international counterparts. Some of the department's foreign policy work is done by nonrotational specialist officers.
Management/consular officers provide help and advice to Canadians outside the country in dealing with issues such as incarceration, death, child abduction and evacuation in the event of a political emergency or natural disaster. They also coordinate the services provided by the department to all Government of Canada departments and agencies operating outside Canada, including contracting, procurement and human resources management. At Headquarters, management/consular officers exercise budgetary and human resources authority.
Trade commissioners make up the Trade Commissioner Service (TCS), a worldwide network of some 1,000 highly skilled professionals with preferred access to contacts in international business. This number includes 650 locally engaged staff at 149 missions around the world. They are instrumental in promoting Canadian economic interests in the global marketplace. The main client groups of TCS are the Canadian business community, for trade and outward investment, and the provinces and municipalities, for inward investment. Its primary objective is to create an internationally competitive private sector and assist companies in achieving success in foreign markets. The service's main activities include helping the country's entrepreneurs succeed in foreign markets by developing and accessing export markets; developing international business contacts; identifying trade barriers, foreign business leads and strategic alliances; promoting two-way investment and joint venture partnering; facilitating licensing, franchising and venture capital linkages as well as acquisition and dissemination of technology and related information; promoting R&D collaboration and commercialization; promoting corporate social responsibility; and advocating Canadian commercial interests. These officers also deal with trade policy issues that arise in their territory and complement the work of trade policy specialists, which is undertaken in missions such as Geneva and Brussels.
Canada has a formal presence in 159 of the world's 192 independent states. Outside Canada, there are 299 locations at which the services of the federal government can be accessed. The number of points of service in each country or other entity depends on the breadth of its bilateral relationship with Canada. For instance, there are more points of service in the United States than in any other country, underscoring the significance of Canada's relations with that nation.
Worldwide, federal government services are available at Canada's:
In addition, there are 16 other locations at which consular services only are provided, under agreements with the governments of Australia and Sweden.
The missions represent the Government of Canada and advance Canadian interests (federal, provincial, territorial and municipal) in designated countries, areas or multilateral organizations by performing one or more of the following functions:
The missions play a growing role in support of Canada's domestic programs and activities. In carrying out these functions, missions ensure the integration and coordination of all federal programs and activities outside Canada. Heads of Missions act on behalf of the entire Government of Canada, not just the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade. Program managers at missions report to their HOMs and to the relevant program authorities in their home departments or agencies.
Each mission has a Committee on Mission Management, usually chaired by the HOM. Its members are the mission's program managers. Meeting weekly, the committee coordinates the mission's policies and programs and oversees its management. While decisions are typically made by consensus, the HOM has the final authority. All federal employees at missions abroad, regardless of their home departments or agencies, act as members of a cohesive Government of Canada team.
The department provides goods, services and real property to other government departments and agencies co-located at missions abroad. The purpose is to:
As part of its transformation agenda, the department is working to re-categorize Canada's missions abroad in order to better align them with the country's international priorities as well as the department's resources, program activities and results, and ensure greater understanding inside and outside the department about the role of missions and expected results.
The following organizations outside of the department's direct governance structure make up what is known as its portfolio:
The Canadian International Development Agency supports sustainable development in developing countries in order to reduce poverty, and contributes to a more secure, equitable and prosperous world. It reports to Parliament through the Minister for International Cooperation. The authority of CIDA is articulated in the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Act, the Annual Appropriation Acts and the International Development (Financial Institutions) Assistance Act. CIDA is currently listed under Schedule 1.1 of the Financial Administration Act. CIDA's website address is http://www.acdi-cida.gc.ca/index-e.htm.
The International Development Research Centre (IDRC) is a Crown corporation created by Parliament in 1970 to help developing countries use science and technology to find practical, long-term solutions to their social, economic and environmental problems. Support is directed toward developing an indigenous research capacity to sustain policies and technologies that developing countries need to build healthier, more equitable and more prosperous societies. IDRC's website address is http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-1-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html.
Export Development Canada (http://www.edc.ca/) is also a parent Crown corporation under Schedule III of the Financial Administration Act. It is a financial institution that provides trade-related financial and insurance services to Canadian exporters and investors.
The Canadian Commercial Corporation (http://www.ccc.ca/index.html) is a parent Crown corporation under Schedule III of the Financial Administration Act. It is an export sales agency that works to expand Canada's international trade, in particular by participating in foreign government procurement and infrastructure projects.
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Secretariat (Canadian Section) (http://www.nafta-secalena.org/canada/index-eng.aspx) is an agency of the Government of Canada under Schedule 1.1 of the Financial Administration Act. The secretariat helps to administer the dispute settlement provisions of the North American Free Trade Agreement.
Rights & Democracy (the International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development) is a non-partisan organization created by Parliament in 1988 to encourage and support the universal values of human rights and the promotion of democratic institutions and practices around the world. This organization receives most of its funding from Canada's Overseas Development Assistance Budget, through the department. Each year, Rights & Democracy submits a report on its activities to the Minister of Foreign Affairs, who tables it in Parliament. More information can be found at http://www.ichrdd.ca/site/home/index.php?lang=en.
The International Joint Commission is an independent bi-national (Canada and the United States) organization established by the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909. Its purpose is to help prevent and resolve disputes over the use and quality of boundary waters and to give advice on related issues. The International Joint Commission website can be found at http://www.ijc.org/en/home/main_accueil.htm.
The Roosevelt Campobello International Park Commission administers the Roosevelt Campobello International Park on the Bay of Fundy as a memorial to former United States President Franklin Roosevelt. The commission was created by an international treaty in 1964, which specifies that the two countries share the costs of the park's development, operation and maintenance. The department approves the Canadian budget. More information can be found on the park's website at http://www.fdr.net/englishii/.
The department works closely with a wide range of domestic and foreign partners, including:
Its client groups include parliamentarians, federal departments and agencies with international operations, provincial governments and others co-located at missions abroad, and Canadians, particularly those with an interest in foreign policy, global business, international travel and study abroad.
Since January 2005, the department has been transforming its structure, processes and culture in order to bring sharper focus to its role in delivering Canada's international policies.
The transformation agenda was devised to address certain realities affecting the department's foreign affairs operating environment, including the growing importance of diplomacy carried out by world leaders; the increasing international engagement of other public- and private-sector players; and the evolution of the department from a policy-oriented organization to one also heavily involved in program and project design, management and delivery, especially with respect to security issues. As a result of these factors, the department has recognized the urgent need to redefine its role within the Government of Canada and modernize its organization and structure in order to best represent Canada and protect Canadian interests in a constantly changing world.
In January 2005, the trade component of the department began implementation of an agenda to modernize its structure, processes and culture in response to the globalization of international commerce and its increasing importance to the Canadian economy. The Global Operations Branch (initially called the World Markets Branch) provided a new focal point in the department to address the global commerce challenges of the 21st century. The branch has led the development of over-arching strategies in specific priority markets (e.g. Brazil, India, China, among others). These strategies integrate all commercial policies, programs and initiatives undertaken at missions abroad with the support of Headquarters, regional offices and key players at the federal, provincial and municipal levels.
The following graph shows at a glance the governance and accountability structure of the department as a whole and how it relates directly to its strategic outcomes and stated priorities for the planning period. More details on this relationship and the department's planning process in general are provided in the sections that follow. As indicated in the graph, there are four elements that make up governance and accountability: strategic direction, functions, structures and management processes.
Since the department's reintegration took place near the end of the 2005-2006 fiscal year, the department was unable to prepare a new, merged Management, Resources and Results Structure-Program Activity Architecture in time for use in putting together this report. Instead, this document reflects the combination of two separate PAAs, which were developed for the previously separate departments of Foreign Affairs Canada and International Trade Canada. The chart below brings together these two PAAs, listing the four strategic outcomes of the reintegrated department: three pertaining to foreign affairs and one to international trade.1
1 Full descriptions of the strategic outcomes and their associated program activities are presented in Part III (foreign affairs) and Part IV (international trade). Elsewhere in the document, the strategic outcomes are identified only by their main themes (e.g. Advancing Canada's Interests Internationally).
Meanwhile, the department is working on a more complete, merged PAA. First, it has recently completed work on a single, interim PAA, which has been approved by Treasury Board of Canada. Second, it is continuing to develop a more fully integrated and comprehensive PAA.
The MRRS-PAA is made up of four critical elements:
The MRRS-PAA is essentially a vertical structure, into which the department's Strategic Planning Framework fits horizontally. In other words, the priorities for the planning period, which are identified in the framework, cut across the department's nine program activities listed in the MRRS-PAA. The framework, first established in 2002, provides the direction needed to achieve the department's priorities for the planning period. It identifies outcomes for the one- to threeyear period as well as accountabilities and performance indicators with which the department will measure its performance.
As a matrix, the MRRS-PAA and Strategic Planning Framework makes clear the department's system of corporate accountability. The MRRS-PAA sets out which ADMs are responsible for the department's program activities as well as which DGs. The same ADMs are also accountable for delivering on the planned outcomes specified in the framework.
To measure the performance of its senior staff (ADMs to Directors), the department is guided by performance management agreements. These agreements enable senior managers to:
In addition, as part of its ongoing transformation agenda, the department will provide all employees with performance appraisals. Staff will evaluate their accomplishments against expectations on an annual basis with their immediate supervisors. The benefit of these tools will be to close any remaining accountability gap within the department.
The following pro forma table summarizes the combined vote funding and statutory spending of the two former departments before they were reintegrated. Readers will find exact figures for the foreign affairs and international trade in the financial tables at the end of Parts III and IV, respectively.
Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade 2006-2007 Summary of Voted and Statutory Items | |
---|---|
Vote / Statutory Items | Current Main Estimates ($ millions) |
Vote 1: Operating expenditures | 1,025.8 |
Vote 5: Capital expenditures | 115.7 |
Vote 10: Grant and contribution expenditures | 718.7 |
Vote 15: Operating expenditures | 156.0 |
Vote 20: Grant and contribution expenditures | 10.9 |
Statutory: Ministers' salaries and car allowances expenditures | 0.2 |
Statutory: Payments under the Diplomatic Service (Special) Superannuation Act. This is an Act to provide superannuation benefits for senior appointees of the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade serving outside Canada. | 0.3 |
Statutory: Contributions to employee benefit plans | 99.1 |
Statutory: Payments to Export Development Canada for facilitating and developing trade between Canada and other countries under the terms of the Export Development Act (budgetary). (These amounts are for Canada Account coverage and are not available for any operational use by the department.) | 18.3 |
Statutory: Payments to Export Development Canada for facilitating and developing trade between Canada and other countries under the terms of the Export Development Act (non-budgetary). (These amounts are for Canada Account coverage and are not available for any operational use by the department.) | 209.0 |
Over the past few years, Treasury Board has approved changes to the department's MRRS-PAA related to its transformation agenda. As a result, the former Global and Security program activity was divided into two separate program activities: International Security and Global Issues. Establishment of the stand-alone International Security program activity recognizes the importance of effectively managing the complex and fast-moving international security agenda post-9/11. Creation of a separate Global Issues program activity brings together the department's expertise on economic, social, political and environmental issues for the purpose of strengthening policy capacity as well as giving greater focus to the department's involvement in issues that cut across the mandates and programs of other federal departments and agencies.
At the same time, the department's Protocol Program was established as a discrete program activity. Previously, it was included in the MRRS-PAA as support to all program activities.
An important change for the department's trade-related component has been the move from two strategic outcomes to one, as well as creating a supporting activity-Strategic Policy, Business Planning and Communications-to contribute to the department's four commerce-related program activities.
The table below provides a snapshot of the department's overall priorities for the year ahead. Each is discussed in greater detail in the relevant sections of this report that follow (i.e. those related to foreign affairs in Part III and those related to international trade in Part IV).
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES | STATUS |
In the Foreign Affairs Component of the Department |
|
1. Greater collaboration with the United States and increased cooperation with all hemispheric partners. | Ongoing |
2. A more secure world for Canada and Canadians, safer from the threats of failed and fragile states, terrorism, transnational crime and weapons of mass destruction. | Ongoing |
3. A revitalized multilateralism, responding to the new challenges of globalization and putting outcomes ahead of processes. | Ongoing |
4. Greater engagement with like-minded partners in the G8 as well as emerging economies such as Brazil, Russia, India and China. | New |
5. Strengthened consular and passport services, able to respond rapidly and flexibly. | Ongoing |
In the International Trade Component of the Department |
|
6. Increased Canadian awareness of the challenges and opportunities presented by global commerce. | Ongoing |
7. More secure access for Canadian business to global markets through the negotiation and implementation of commercial agreements. | Ongoing |
8. Assistance to Canadian business to compete successfully for global opportunities. | Ongoing |
9. Promotion of Canada as a globally competitive location and partner for investment, innovation and value-added production. | Ongoing |
In the Operational Arena |
|
10. A foreign ministry that is recognized as modern and agile. | Ongoing |
This part of the report deals exclusively with the department's foreign affairs component.
From here to the end of this Report on Plans and Priorities, the information on the department's foreign affairs and trade components will be presented separately. This will make the document simpler and easier to use, allowing readers to zero in more easily on the information in which they are interested.
The department's three strategic outcomes related to foreign affairs (in bold below) are as follows:
The MRRS-PAA enables more effective, results-based management of its operations by clustering together the policy instruments and programs that fit logically under each strategic outcome, as follows:
Strategic Outcome: Advancing Canada's Interests Internationally: in partnership with Canadians, Canada and its values are projected to the world, Canada's interests are pursued abroad and Canadians are better able to interpret the world. |
Program Activities: |
Strategic Policy and Public Diplomacy: leading the formulation of Canada's overall international
policy and interdepartmental development of whole-of-government strategies, including public diplomacy. International Security: advocating Canadian international security interests and human security program interests bilaterally and multilaterally, as well as managing the department's responsibilities with respect to security and intelligence. Global Issues: advocating a stronger and more effective multilateral system, capable of addressing Canada's interests in global issues, particularly international economic relations and development, the environment and sustainable development, human rights and human security. Bilateral Relations: conducting and promoting Canada's bilateral diplomatic relations in Canada and abroad (two components: North America and the world beyond North America). Protocol: managing and facilitating the presence of foreign diplomats in Canada, as well as planning and leading official travel by the Governor General, the Prime Minister, Ministers of the Portfolio and all official diplomatic events. |
Strategic Outcome: Serving Government Abroad: the government of Canada delivers its programs and achieves its results in a secure environment through cost-effective and efficient services and infrastructure at Canada's missions abroad. |
Program Activities: |
Common Services and Infrastructure (support from Headquarters and missions abroad): managing and
delivering Headquarters- and mission-provided common services to government programs and partners operating abroad. |
Strategic Outcome: Serving Canadians Abroad: Canadians travelling and living abroad are provided with effective assistance, guidance, advice and services for their travel documents and consular needs. |
Program Activities: |
Consular Affairs: managing and delivering consular services to Canadians. |
Passport Services: managing and delivering passport services to Canadians (through use of the Passport Revolving
Fund). |
The department's priorities are in keeping with the April 2006 Speech from the Throne, which noted the government's intention to strengthen "our role in the world" by:
The department's strategic outcomes and program activities align with Government of Canada outcomes identified in Canada's Performance, an annual report to Parliament on the federal government's performance, prepared by Treasury Board. The outcomes it lists under the policy area of Canada's Place in the World are as follows:
It may be instructive to explain briefly the actual mechanics of the planning cycle.
Each year, the process usually begins in the summer when the department's formal decision-making committees collaborate to identify key priorities for the year ahead and planned outcomes for the full three-year planning period. The committees ensure that these priorities comply with-and complement-government-wide priorities, as outlined in the most recent Speech from the Throne and Annual Report to the Prime Minister on the Public Service of Canada from the Clerk of the Privy Council. In addition, the department ensures that its plans incorporate:
Also in the summer, the department's senior managers ensure that identified priorities for the coming year support long-term strategic outcomes and are aligned with resources, as outlined in the MRRS-PAA. The department's program activities flow in a direct and logical manner from its strategic outcomes, while its short- and medium-term outcomes flow from identified priorities. To enable accurate and reliable assessment of the department's performance over the planning period, specific performance indicators are identified and presented in a matrix arrangement, corresponding to each of the department's planned outcomes (see the related logic model in Part III, section 3.1.5).
In the late fall/early winter, the department initiates the business planning process, in accordance with priorities identified in its Strategic Planning Framework. This framework guides preparation of the department's branch and bureau plans as well as its country-specific strategies (formerly referred to as mission plans). The country strategies are developed from a government-wide perspective. Their purpose is to:
These strategies are reviewed by the department's federal partners co-located at missions abroad. Their feedback is incorporated in the country strategies.
When the department's plans are completed, they are reviewed by senior managers and, once approved, resourced appropriately. From April to June, the department uses the approved plans and strategies to guide preparation of mandate letters and performance management agreements for Heads of Missions and senior executives. Thereafter, managers throughout the department develop performance agreements for all their staff, guided by the Performance Management Program. This program is a key component of the department's strategy for monitoring performance. Essentially, its purpose is to link individual accountability to departmental and government-wide strategies and priorities and to clearly identify performance expectations and priorities related to planning and leadership. At the end of the performance cycle, employees are assessed on results achieved, measured against identified performance indicators.
The department also uses its approved plans and strategies as the basic material for its Report on Plans and Priorities. This report, which is a compilation and explanation of the department's annual business plans, is an official element in the Estimates process. Like its counterpart, the Departmental Performance Report, this document is tabled in Parliament and is made available to all Canadians and others with an interest in Canada's foreign policy.
The complexity and volatility of the international community in which the department operates poses a number of challenges and risks-both strategic and operational-which must be identified and considered in its annual planning cycle.
The principal internal challenges include:
The department is involved in major horizontal files. It has the lead on, and responsibility for, the Enhanced Representation Initiative (http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/rma/eppi-ibdrp/hrdb-rhbd/eri-ireu/description-eng.asp). This initiative has increased Canada's representation in the United States through a partnership of seven federal departments and agencies. It provides a coordinated and integrated approach to managing and advancing Canada's advocacy, trade, business development, science and technology, and investment interests in the United States.
Other horizontal files on which the department is active include:
Seven major external challenges currently affect Canadian foreign policy:
It is also noteworthy that Canadians are travelling abroad in greater numbers and taking a keener interest in foreign policy issues, including international relief efforts, foreign aid (notably by the G8) and the treatment of Canadians abroad (particularly in reference to the Maher Arar inquiry and the death of photojournalist Zahra Kazemi in Iran). As a result, the department continues to face growing demands for its services from partners, clients and the Canadian public.
Throughout 2006, the department will be coordinating several major events in Canada, including the Francophonie conference-the Conférence ministérielle sur la prévention des conflits et la sécurité humaine (Saint-Boniface, Manitoba) in May, the NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) Parliamentary Assembly (Quebec City) in November and the state visit by the King and Queen of Sweden in October. In addition, the department will coordinate Canada's participation at numerous international meetings of significance, including the World Economic Forum (Davos) in January, the G8 Summit (St. Petersburg) in July, the NATO Summit (Riga, Latvia) in November, the UN General Assembly (New York City) in September, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Summit (the Philippines) in December, the London Conference on Afghanistan (London, England) in January/February and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Summit in Vietnam in November.
The department identifies and closely monitors risks associated with its mandate on an ongoing basis. This work is based on the Treasury Board framework (see http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pubs_pol/dcgpubs/RiskManagement/rmf-cgr01-1-eng.asp#An%20Integrated%20Risk) , which helps departments identify, manage and communicate risk from an organization-wide perspective. Risk management is an integral element of the department's Strategic Planning Framework.
Currently, the department has in place a large number of risk mitigation strategies for certain programs and overall operations. However, more work needs to be done in this area, given that some elements of the department still use informal methods of risk assessment and management. As its policy and program capacity is strengthened, the department continues to make progress in improving its assessment, management and communication of risks.
At present, the main strategic risks for the department are as follows:
Major Publications of Relevance to Foreign Affairs
Over the past year, a number of publications have addressed the future direction of Canadian foreign policy, UN reform, the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals and human security, as follows:
A further study of note, although unrelated to foreign policy, is Accenture's 7th annual global report on government service delivery ((http://www.accenture.com/xdoc/ca/locations/canada/acn_2006_govt_report_FINAL_sm.pdf). The report includes interviews with senior government executives from 11 nations, including Canada, that have consistently ranked highly in the company's yearly survey on e-government. In fact, Canada is one of only two countries listed by the report as trendsetters in this field.
Parliamentary Committee Business
The House of Commons Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade (SCFAIT) has issued reports on a broad range of issues over the past year, including the humanitarian crisis in Darfur, international aid and the participation of Israel in the UN. In addition, the committee reviewed Bill C-25 (An Act Governing the Operation of Remote Sensing Space Systems) and Bill S-36 (An Act to amend the Export and Import of Rough Diamonds Act) and reported back to the House of Commons.
The government responded to SCFAIT reports on issues that included Canada's relations with countries of the Muslim world and mining in developing countries/corporate social responsibility.
In November 2005, the Standing Committee on Public Accounts tabled in Parliament the SCFAIT report Passport Office- Passport Services, a review of an April 2005 Passport Canada audit that had been conducted by the Auditor General. Due to the dissolution of Parliament on November 29, 2005, the government has not tabled a response.
The Senate Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs continued its special study on Africa, focusing on development and security challenges, the response of the international community, Canada's policy related to Africa and Canadian activity on that continent. The Senate committee also examined Bills C-25 and S-36.
Public Opinion Research of Relevance to the Department
A recent 33-country poll, conducted for the BBC by GlobeScan and the University of Maryland's Program on International Policy Attitudes, rated the international influence of various nations and regions. The majority of respondents viewed Canada's global influence as mainly positive, including in the United States (70 percent), France (75 percent), China (70 percent), Nigeria (58 percent) and Brazil (54 percent). In fact, Canada ranked third (after Japan and Europe) as a force for good in the international community among 10 countries and regions. The poll of 39,435 people was conducted between October 2005 and January 2006. Since surveys in some countries were conducted only in urban areas, the aggregated results are unlikely to be representative of national populations. Therefore, a margin of error cannot be applied. More details about the poll's overall findings are available at http://www.globescan.com/news_archives/bbcpoll06- 3.html.
North American relations were the subject of a recent EKOS survey (part of their Rethinking North American Integration project, which interviewed 2,005 Canadians and 1,505 Americans in October 2005, with margins of error of +/-2.2 percent and +/-2.5 percent respectively). While 52 percent of Americans described their country's relations with Canada as good, only 29 percent of Canadians expressed the same view. Compared to a similar survey conducted four months earlier, these results showed a small decline in favourable attitudes on both sides of the border. In June 2005, 55 percent of Americans and 34 percent of Canadians had rated bilateral relations as good.
In August 2006, the second quarter Anholt-GMI Nation Brands Index ranked 35 countries worldwide in terms of the global appeal of their nation brands (http://www.nationbrandindex.com/nbi_q206-canada-press-release.phtml). Canada placed third overall, after the European Union and the United Kingdom. Canada's other standings in specific categories included first place in people, second in investment (good place to study, live or work for a substantial period), third in governance and eighth in exports (the country's contributions to innovation and science). The survey was conducted in 35 countries between May 18 and June 4, 2006, using feedback from 25,093 online respondents.
According to the International Policy Survey conducted by the University of Ottawa in October 2005 (a sample of 1,000 Canadians with a margin of error of +/-3.1 percent, 19 times out of 20):
The public's view of the department's performance has been monitored over the past four years in annual surveys. In 2005, two-thirds (66 percent) of Canadians gave the department's diplomats high marks for representing Canada internationally. Sixty-nine percent said that the department does well in promoting human rights around the world, 64 percent approved of the way it promotes world peace and security and 61 percent approved of the way it helps Canadian travellers abroad. The public was somewhat less buoyant (at 53 percent) about departmental efforts to address poverty in developing nations (the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Communications Survey 2005, which had a margin of error of +/-2.2 percent, 19 times out of 20).
In September/October 2005, the department commissioned Environics Research Group to conduct 2,024 telephone interviews of adult Canadians. This survey had a margin of error of +/-2.2 percent, 19 times out of 20. Among its findings:
Over the next three years, the department is committed to expanding its capacities related to policy and program delivery and project management, while taking the lead in ensuring foreign policy coherence across the federal government. At the same time, the department aims to make itself more relevant to the government and to Canadians by strengthening and making more effective Canadian diplomacy and repositioning the Foreign Service as a strategic agency that connects Canadians to the world.
In setting its priorities for the planning period, the department has laid a logical, achievable and specific course for Canadian foreign policy. First, it confirms that Canada's geopolitical base is in North America and underscores the primary importance of greater collaboration with the United States and increased cooperation with partners in the entire hemisphere. Second, it addresses the continued need to ensure the safety and security of Canada, and of Canadians at home and abroad, while contributing significantly to global peace and security efforts such as counterterrorism, and actively addressing the root causes of terrorism by working to increase freedom, democracy, the rule of law and human rights. Specifically, Canadian diplomacy will remain active in Afghanistan and work to engage the Muslim world. Third, it applies Canadian thinking to help reinvigorate the multilateral system to increase its effectiveness. Fourth, it recognizes the need for Canada to engage more fully with like-minded partners in the G8 as well as emerging economies such as Brazil, Russia, India and China, whose influence and involvement in global affairs is increasing. Fifth, it continues to strengthen its vital passport and consular services to Canadians. Finally, the department will focus priority on its continuing transformation agenda in order to ensure that it has greater effectiveness and operational flexibility to help create a more influential role in global affairs. The six strategic priorities for the planning period are:
The following table identifies the outcomes planned for the next one to three years for each priority.
Strategic Priorities |
Outcomes Planned for Next 1 to 3 Years |
1. Greater collaboration with the United States and increased cooperation with all hemispheric partners |
|
|
|
2. A more secure world for Canada and Canadians |
|
|
|
3. A revitalized multilateralism, responding to the new challenges of globalization and putting outcomes ahead of processes |
|
|
|
4. Greater engagement with likeminded partners in the G8 as well as emerging economies such as Brazil, Russia, India and China |
|
|
|
5. Strengthened consular and passport services, able to respond rapidly and flexibly |
|
|
|
6. A foreign ministry that is recognized as modern and agile |
|
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
|||
Year |
2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Total Planned Spending |
2,020.1 | 1,898.0 | 1,860.4 |
|
The budget of the department's foreign affairs component is allocated through Main and Supplementary Estimates approved by Parliament. Given the timing of this year's federal election, funding was provided in an exceptional manner- through Main Estimates as well as by means of a Governor General Special Warrant (the established instrument for obtaining funds when Parliament is dissolved for the purpose of a general election).
As indicated in the table above, the foreign affairs-related planned spending for 2006-2007 will be $2,020.1 million, an increase of $78.9 million over the amount allocated in the 2006-2007 Main Estimates of $1,941.2 million. This increase is intended to cover:
These higher costs will be offset by decreases resulting from:
The department has three voted appropriations (related to operating expenditures, capital expenditures, and grants and contributions) and three statutory authorities. For 2006-2007, the budget will be allocated as follows: roughly 53 percent for operating expenditures, 6 percent for capital expenditures, and 37 percent for grants and contributions. Approximately 80 percent of the grants and contributions are made up of assessed contributions. Statutory expenditures account for the rest of the budget.
Human resources expenditures, excluding $80 million related to employee benefits plans, account for approximately 36 percent of the budget. In general, human resources expenditures, aside from those related to Passport Canada, are funded through voted appropriations. However, employee benefit plans are statutory payments. All expenses related to Passport Canada are statutory payments approved by Parliament.
A detailed breakdown of the planned spending of the department's foreign affairs component can be found in Part III, section 3.1.4. The financial resources are distributed across the nine program activities as follows:
Planned spending for 2006-2007 includes scheduled funding reductions of $19.78 million-$13 million for specific initiatives of the department and $6.78 million related to procurement reform (part of a process led by Public Works and Government Services Canada [PWGSC]). While these cuts are incorporated into its business plans, the department continues to work closely with Treasury Board, PWGSC and other affected departments on implementation of the procurement reforms and associated cuts, with particular emphasis on their expected impact on operations in the years ahead.
The department remains committed to building a bilingual, culturally diverse, gender-balanced and innovative workforce that more fully reflects Canadian society as a whole. The department is also working to address the gap in resources for a number of its key occupational groups.
Human Resources (FTEs) |
|||
Year |
2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Total Planned FTEs |
10,144 | 10,298 | 10,596 |
|
FTEs refers to full-time equivalents, the human resources required to sustain an average level of employment over 12 months, based on a 37.5-hour work week. The figure above indicates the approximate number of FTEs the department used in the last fiscal year.
The department's workforce is made up of three separate groups. First, there are Canada-based rotational staff, mainly Human resources (FTEs) are distributed across the nine program activities as follows:
The success of any organization depends entirely on its employees. This is especially true for the department, which requires a unique blend of highly skilled people. The department is continuing to modernize its human resources management. Several significant change initiatives are still under way-some in keeping with government-wide legislative change (e.g. implementation of the Public Service Modernization Act) and others related to the department's transformation agenda and management priorities, including implementation of the Performance Management Program, restructuring of the Foreign Service and development of a human resources plan for the management and consular affairs officers group.
The department is continually working to improve transparency and accountability throughout its operations, with a focus on results-based management. In so doing, it is increasing its performance-related data collection and is starting to identify and apply more stringent and informative performance indicators.
Given the broad scope of the department's mandate and activities, it must employ both quantitative and qualitative indicators. The reason is simple: while work related to serving government and Canadians abroad lends itself to numerical and statistical analysis, efforts related to advancing Canada's interests internationally must be assessed to a large extent in a much more qualitative manner. For instance, while client surveys and service records are effective and insightful guides as to how well the department is providing passport services, they are not as useful in assessing the department's contribution to international threat reduction and counterterrorism.
Quantitative indicators: To evaluate work associated with serving government and Canadians abroad, the department has adopted, or is in the process of adopting, a systematic approach. The following are four key examples of this work:
To assess its human resources management and identify related issues, the department uses results of employee surveys, both Public Service-wide and departmental; internal audits and evaluations; the annual report of the Canadian Foreign Service Institute; the yearly Organizational Health Report; and ongoing human resources profiles of branches. The Performance Management Agreement is also a useful tool for evaluating the skills and competencies of the department's executive cadre.
Quantitative and qualitative indicators: To measure the department's progress in advancing Canada's interests internationally, the department uses performance indicators that include:
Readers should understand that this list of performance measures is by no means fixed or exhaustive. The department is refining its means of performance monitoring on an ongoing basis in order to ensure that it remains credible and effective. More detailed performance indicators for specific program activities are included in Part III, section 3.2. It should also be pointed out that the department's performance indicators tend to be specific to each priority and planned outcome rather than applicable across all activities, given the broad and diverse scope of the department's functions.
Each year, the department undertakes a series of targeted audits and evaluations throughout its operations to provide senior management with performance information (see Part III, section 3.3, table 3.15 for more details).
This report identifies specific performance indicators related to each of the department's policy and management ties. These indicators will be used to assess the department's performance in relation to the plans identified in this report, which will be discussed in full in the 2006-2007 Departmental Performance Report.
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS |
Strategic Priority 1: Greater collaboration with the United States and increased cooperation with all hemispheric partners |
Key Priority Indicators: Milestones achieved marking negotiation progress; increased cooperation on range of government activity to advance Canadian interests and promote better understanding of Canada's relations with the United States and Mexico; more agreements and fewer disputes; increasing number of staff posted to missions and collaborative networks. |
Strategic Priority 2: A more secure world for Canada and Canadians |
Key Priority Indicators: Increased international recognition of Canadian security assistance; tangible elimination of weapons and materials of mass destruction; increased capacity to plan and deliver whole-of-government responses to international crises; increased knowledge and capacity of developing states to take necessary measures to counter terrorism, corruption and transnational crime. |
Strategic Priority 3: A revitalized multilateralism |
Key Priority Indicators: Pace of UN reforms; level of international acceptance of Canadian global issues and human security agenda; level of success in creating a whole-of-government platform to advance global issues and the human security agenda. |
Strategic Priority 4: Greater engagement with like-minded partners in the G8 as well as emerging economies such as Brazil, Russia, India and China |
Key Priority Indicators: Milestones achieved marking negotiation progress. |
Strategic Priority 5: Strengthened consular and passport services |
Key Priority Indicators: Client satisfaction ratings; the extent to which citizenship applications are reviewed and forwarded to the Registrar of Citizenship within the 10-day Service Standard; the extent to which contact with detainees meets service standards; the extent to which service standards are met for passport services; results of focus-group testing and a national survey designed to better understand consular clients; results of employee surveys on the new strategy for consular services. |
Strategic Priority 6: A modern foreign ministry |
Key Priority Indicators: Treasury Board Secretariat's Management Accountability Framework assessment; recognition of departmental leadership on administrative and management issues; progress in program and policy renewal; level of integration of corporate systems into decision-making processes; increase in number of political, economic relations and public affairs officers abroad; agreement of federal partners on special operating agency concept. |
|
All the performance indicators noted above are referenced in the pages that follow. In addition, this report identifies numerous Internet sites at which readers can find verification of information provided as well as more details about virtually all aspects of the department and its activities.
The following graph shows the logic model for the department at a glance, identifying:
This section explains how each program activity (or program or service) supports the department's plans, priorities and expected results identified in Part III, section 3.1. The following graph shows the department's foreign affairs-related Program Activity Architecture.
Program Activity: leading the formulation of Canada's overall international policy and the interdepartmental development of whole-of-government strategies, including public diplomacy.
In carrying out this activity, the department:
This activity contributes to the department's objectives of advancing and defending Canadian interests internationally by bringing coherence to the department's strategic policy development and priority setting, developing and coordinating its public diplomacy activities to help promote an international environment predisposed to Canadian values and interests and increasing the understanding of Canadians about global issues and foreign policy.
The activity listed above also delivers real benefits to Canadians by:
Planning Context: The following factors affect the strategic planning and public diplomacy functions of the department:
The department manages significant grant and contribution programs related to its strategic policy and public diplomacy programs, including grants in aid of academic and cultural relations. Most of these programs help increase international awareness of Canadian distinctiveness and culture, while helping to articulate Canadian attitudes and positions in foreign media, business, cultural and academic circles. These programs also help young Canadians to travel and work abroad, which not only enriches their own experiences but also benefits the host countries. In 2006-2007, the department will spend just over $22 million on these grant and contribution programs.
The priorities are:
Each of the strategic priorities for this program activity is supported by one or more one- to three-year outcomes. The department will advance the achievement of these outcomes by taking the following actions:
Greater collaboration with the United States and increased cooperation with all hemispheric partners, leading to greater security and prosperity
Together, these initiatives will help encourage greater dialogue and understanding among Canadians, Americans and Mexicans.
A revitalized multilateralism, responding to the new challenges of globalization and putting outcomes ahead of processes
A greater engagement with like-minded partners in the G8 as well as emerging economies such as Brazil, Russia, India and China
A foreign ministry that is recognized as modern and agile
The following initiatives will enable Canadians to be better informed about, and more engaged in, international policy:
The following initiatives will enable better integration and management of public diplomacy resources:
As part of the overall transformation agenda, the Strategic Policy and Public Diplomacy program activity will:
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
|||
Year |
2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Total Planned Total Planned Spending |
46.4 | 41.7 | 41.6 |
|
Human Resources (FTEs) |
|||
Year |
2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Total Planned Full Time Equivalents |
162 | 162 | 162 |
|
The department continues to link its human resources and business planning throughout its operations. It has developed a plan, which addresses human resources requirements and responds to concerns expressed in employee surveys. It focuses on four key areas: innovative leadership, an aligned organization, a skilled workforce and an enabling workplace. In addition, the department has produced a new planning template for human resources to be used in the forthcoming business planning cycle. It connects anticipated human resources needs and identified issues and risks for each program activity with the department's overall strategic direction. To avoid repetition, the points contained in this paragraph will not be repeated under each of the department's program activities.
Strategic Priority 1: Greater collaboration with the United States and increased cooperation with all hemispheric partners |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Milestones achieved marking negotiation progress; increased cooperation on a range of government activity to advance Canadian interests and promote better understanding of Canada's relations with the United States and Mexico; more agreements and fewer disputes; increasing number of staff posted to missions and collaborative networks |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
Strategic Priority 3: A revitalized multilateralism |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Level of success in creating a whole-of-government platform to advance global issues and the human security agenda |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
Strategic Priority 4: Greater engagement with like-minded partners in the G8 as well as emerging economies such as Brazil, Russia, India and China |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Milestones achieved marking negotiations |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
Strategic Priority 6: A modern foreign ministry |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Treasury Board Secretariat's Management Accountability Framework assessment; recognition of departmental leadership on administrative and management issues; progress in program and policy renewal; level of integration of corporate systems into decision-making processes; increase in number of political, economic relations and public affairs officers abroad |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Program Activity: advocating Canadian international security interests and human security program interests bilaterally and multilaterally, as well as managing the department's responsibilities with respect to security and intelligence.
In carrying out this activity, the department:
The government has made available to the department new current year resources for further security enhancements abroad and global peace and security initiatives, including the Stabilization and Reconstruction Task Force. START will provide timely and coordinated whole-of-government responses to international crises (natural and human-made).
In pursuing Canada's international security agenda, the department makes use of the full range of Canada's diplomatic tools and assets, notably its network of missions, which include the country's representation at NATO in Brussels, the UN in Vienna and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in Vienna.
The department also collaborates on security issues with a wide range of federal partners, including the Department of National Defence, Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) as well as with other levels of government across the country and members of civil society. In addition, the department works on security matters with like-minded nations and multilateral and other international organizations.
Planning Context: There are a number of significant security issues facing the international community, including:
These threats have sharply increased the potential impact of distant conflicts on Canada and Canadians.
Additional factors affecting Canada's efforts in international peace and security include the considerable influence of the United States in world affairs and its preoccupation with security in the post-9/11 environment; the role of rising powers such as Brazil, Russia, India and China; the growing intensity and impact of natural disasters; and the ongoing debate about the effectiveness of multilateral organizations like the UN in dealing with global security.
The department manages nearly $175 million in grant and contribution programs related to security. These include:
The priorities are:
Each of the strategic priorities for this program activity is supported by one or more one- to three-year outcomes. The department will advance the achievement of these outcomes by taking the following actions:
Greater collaboration with the United States and increased cooperation with all hemispheric partners, leading to greater security and prosperity
The initiatives under this strategic priority will help strengthen cooperation with the United States on border, transboundary and security issues.
A more secure world, safer from the threats of failed and fragile states, terrorism, transnational crime and weapons of mass destruction
A number of activities undertaken under this priority will help to improve the political and economic stability of failed and fragile states, as follows:
A number of initiatives within the International Security program activity are aimed at reducing opportunities for the proliferation of weapons and materials of mass destruction, as follows:
International Atomic Energy Agency, the Nuclear Suppliers Group, the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons and the UN's Conference on Disarmament.
In addition, the department announced in April 2006 that Canada is contributing an additional $8 million to help complete the concrete shelter covering the damaged reactor at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in Ukraine. The shelter is expected to reduce radiation levels in the region.
A revitalized multilateralism, responding to the new challenges of globalization and putting outcomes ahead of processes
A greater engagement with like-minded partners in the G8 as well as emerging economies such as Brazil, Russia, India and China
A foreign ministry that is recognized as modern and agile
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
|||
Year |
2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Total Planned Total Planned Spending |
361.0 | 315.8 | 344.5 |
|
Human Resources (FTEs) |
|||
Year |
2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Total Planned Full Time Equivalents |
411 | 411 | 411 |
|
Strategic Priority 1: Greater collaboration with the United States and increased cooperation with all hemispheric partners |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Milestones achieved marking negotiation progress |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic Priority 2: A more secure world for Canada and Canadians |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Increased international recognition of Canadian security assistance; tangible elimination of weapons and materials of mass destruction; increased capacity to plan and deliver whole-of-government responses to international crises; increased knowledge and capacity of developing states to take necessary measures to counter terrorism, corruption and transnational crime |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic Priority 3: A revitalized multilateralism |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Pace of UN reforms |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
Strategic Priority 4: Greater engagement with like-minded partners in the G8 as well as emerging economies such as Brazil, Russia, India and China |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Milestones achieved marking negotiation progress |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
Strategic Priority 6: A modern foreign ministry |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Treasury Board's Management Accountability Framework assessment; recognition of departmental leadership on administrative and management issues; progress in program and policy renewal; level of integration of corporate systems into decision-making processes |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
|
Program Activity: advocating a stronger and more effective multilateral system, capable of addressing Canada's interests in global issues, particularly international economic relations and development, the environment and sustainable development, human rights and human security.
In carrying out this activity, the department:
In carrying out its activities related to global issues, the department works closely with Canada's UN missions in New York City and Geneva as well as its missions to UNESCO and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), both in Paris.
Planning Context: Canada's prosperity and security are more directly affected by international trends and events than ever before. Serious issues confront the international community, including the impacts of migration, the transnational spread of infectious diseases, longer-term energy security and the need for reform of multilateral organizations to keep pace with the shifting global environment and the growing number of players on global issues at home and abroad.
In this context, progress in achieving key Canadian objectives can seem ponderously slow. Hence, Canada remains focused on medium- to longer-term objectives and solutions, while remaining agile enough to manage immediate and short-term issues.
It is essential for the department to collaborate extensively with a full range of partners, including other federal departments and agencies, other levels of government across the country, the private sector, non-governmental organizations, the academic community and think tanks. Internationally, the department collaborates,inter-alia, on global issues with UN organizations, the G8, the Commonwealth, La Francophonie, the OECD and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum and the Secretariats of the key Multilateral Environment Agreements (MEAs).
The priorities are:
Each of the strategic priorities for this program activity is supported by one or more one- to three-year outcomes. The department will advance the achievement of these outcomes by taking the following actions:
A more secure world for Canada and Canadians, safer from the threats of failed and fragile states, terrorism, transnational crime and weapons of mass destruction
A revitalized multilateralism, responding to the new challenges of globalization and putting outcomes ahead of processes
A number of initiatives related to this program activity are aimed at developing and implementing a whole-of-government agenda on global issues that advances Canadian objectives in areas such as migration, health, energy security, cities and the environment. Following are some of the key initiatives for the planning period:
A foreign ministry that is recognized as modern and agile
The Global Issues program activity plays a part in the transformation agenda of the department. The following initiatives will help the department provide more effective leadership and coherence on international policy issues and strategy, better inform and engage Canadians in international policy, and provide greater program, policy and economic analysis capacity at both Headquarters and abroad.
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
|||
Year |
2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Total Planned Total Planned Spending |
513.0 | 542.3 | 529.9 |
|
Human Resources (FTEs) |
|||
Year |
2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Total Planned Full Time Equivalents |
470 | 470 | 470 |
|
Strategic Priority 2: A more secure world for Canada and Canadians |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Increased international recognition of Canadian security assistance; tangible elimination of weapons and materials of mass destruction; increased capacity to plan and deliver whole-of-government responses to international crises; increased knowledge and capacity of developing states to take necessary measures to counter terrorism, corruption and transnational crime |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
Strategic Priority 3: A revitalized multilateralism |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Pace of UN reforms; level of international acceptance of Canadian global issues and human security agenda; level of success in creating a whole-of-government platform to advance global issues and human security agenda |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic Priority 6: A modern foreign ministry |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Treasury Board's Management Accountability Framework assessment, recognition of departmental leadership on administrative and management issues; progress in program and policy renewal; level of integration of corporate systems into decision-making processes |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Program Activity: conducting and promoting Canada's bilateral diplomatic relations in Canada and abroad.2 This activity has two components-North America and Bilateral Relations (the rest of the world).
In carrying out the North American component of this activity, the department:
The department's Enhanced Representation Initiative is a partnership of seven departments and agencies that works to augment advocacy and business development activities in the United States. Under the initiative, launched in 2003, Canada has added new missions, upgraded existing missions, established a network of honorary consuls and provided additional program resources in the United States. Through this initiative the department fosters a strategic, whole-ofgovernment approach to Canada's engagement with the United States
Canada's missions in the United States and Mexico are responsible for program delivery on a national and regional basis. They promote Canadian policy and implement advocacy strategies developed by the department in collaboration with relevant federal partners as well as the provinces and territories. Those partners include Privy Council Office, Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada, Canada Border Services Agency, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Citizenship and Immigration Canada, Transport Canada and Environment Canada.
Another key element in the government's effort to make Canadian advocacy in the United States more strategic is the Washington Secretariat, located at the Canadian Embassy in Washington, D.C. The secretariat has two units, one supporting the activities of Parliament and the other enhancing provincial representation through measures such as colocation at the embassy. Alberta has been represented at the secretariat since 2005.
2The other components of this program activity--Bilateral Relations (rest of the world)--is discussed in the next subsection (Part III, section 3.2.4.2). Details about the combined financial and human resources used by the two components of this program activity are presented in Part III, section 3.2.1.4.2.3.
Through its weekly Advocacy Report Card, the department shares information with partner departments and agencies on upcoming events in the United States and reports on recent initiatives. In addition, the department distributes a quarterly booklet entitled Key Messages, which provides communications lines on major bilateral priorities, to federal partners and a wide range of Canadian stakeholders, including provincial and territorial governments and the private sector.
Planning Context: The importance of Canada's relations with the United States cannot be overstated. Canadian foreign policy recognizes the considerable influence of the United States in world affairs as well as Canada's economic interdependence with that country.
The scope and complexity of the Canada-United States relationship means that most federal departments, as well as all provinces and territories and many municipalities, have direct dealings with the United States. Meanwhile, the Mexico- Canada relationship is also gaining in importance, as is the push toward enhanced trilateral cooperation within North America. These factors demand close cooperation and coordination between the department and its full range of partners.
Post-9/11 security considerations, counterterrorism and the war in Iraq continue to dominate the United States agenda. As a result, it has become increasingly difficult to focus attention on, or advance, Canadian interests and issues in the United States.
Mexico is a strategic bilateral and regional partner in Canadian foreign policy. Under the North American Free Trade Agreement, Mexico has become Canada's fifth most important export market and third most important source of imports (2005 figures). The Mexican government has identified Canada as a strategic partner, particularly in terms of modernization of governance and as a model for reforms. Moreover, Mexico has become a more dynamic and engaged multilateralist middle power with which Canada can cooperate.
Canada, the United States and Mexico are now moving forward with a Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), a trilateral effort to increase the security, prosperity and quality of life of North Americans (see http://www.pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=1084. The SPP provides a flexible framework for bilateral and trilateral cooperation in North America.
The priority is greater collaboration with the United States and increased cooperation with all hemispheric partners, leading to greater security and prosperity.
The strategic priority for this program activity is supported by one or more one- to three-year outcomes. The department will advance the achievement of these outcomes by taking the following actions:
Greater collaboration with the United States and increased cooperation with all hemispheric partners, leading to greater security and prosperity
The department will:
Strengthened cooperation with the United States on border, transboundary and security issues
The department will:
The March 2006 trilateral summit also resulted in a commitment to implement, over the next two years, several measures to increase law enforcement cooperation and reduce border slowdowns affecting legitimate trade flows.
In April 2006, Foreign Minister MacKay met with United States Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice in Washington, D.C. Discussions covered a wide range of bilateral issues, including the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative, as well as other hemispheric and global matters such as the parliamentary elections in Haiti and the ongoing conflict in Darfur.
Strengthened bilateral relations with the United States and Mexico in a number of key areas
The department will:
Greater dialogue and understanding among Canadians, Americans and Mexicans
The department will:
Increased trilateral collaboration on key political and economic issues of concern to Canadians
The department will:
This information can be found consolidated with the Bilateral Relations Program Sub-Activity information in 3.2.1.4.2.3
Strategic Priority 1: Greater collaboration with the United States and increased cooperation with all hemispheric partners |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Milestones achieved marking negotiation progress; increased cooperation on range of government activity to advance Canadian interests and promote better understanding of Canada's relations with the United States and Mexico; more agreements and fewer disputes; increasing number of staff posted to missions and collaborative networks |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Program Activity: conducting and promoting Canada's bilateral diplomatic relations in Canada and abroad.
In carrying out the Bilateral Relations (rest of the world) component of this activity, the department:
The country-specific strategies noted in the second bullet above are reviewed by the department's federal partners colocated at missions abroad (see full list in Part III, section 3.1.1.3). Their feedback is incorporated and, through the interdepartmental Committee on Representation Abroad, corresponding resources are identified for reallocation to ensure the successful implementation of the strategies. (A more detailed description of this process is also in Part III, section 3.1.1.3.)
The department is reasserting the role of ambassadors and other Heads of Missions as the authoritative voice of Canada in their designated countries and in multilateral forums. Heads of Missions will implement the new whole-of-government country and regional strategies, and will play a greater part in delivering Canada's foreign policy messages at home and abroad, with the help of the department's strengthened Public Diplomacy Program.
The department continues to enhance security at missions abroad to address the ongoing risks of terrorist activities, cyber-crime and espionage. It also addresses other key issues affecting the international community, including the transnational spread of disease, natural disasters such as the earthquakes that struck Pakistan and Indonesia in late 2005 and mid-2006 respectively, environmental degradation and the increasing number of failed and fragile states worldwide.
Canada needs to further develop its relationships with rising powers such as Brazil, Russia, India and China, commensurate with their global influence, on a bilateral basis as well as in regional and multilateral forums (particularly important in the case of Russia, which is chairing the G8 in 2006). This process must be guided by whole-of-government strategies that reflect the full range of Canadian interests.
Planning Context: Canadian foreign policy must continue to address rapidly changing international developments, which include the following:
The priorities are:
Each of the strategic priorities for this program activity is supported by one or more one- to three-year outcomes. The department will advance the achievement of these outcomes by taking the following actions:
Greater collaboration with the United States and increased cooperation with all hemispheric partners, leading to greater security and prosperity
A more secure world for Canada and Canadians, safer from the threats of failed and fragile states, terrorism, transnational crime and weapons of mass destruction
Improved political and economic stability of failed and fragile states (Afghanistan, Haiti, Sudan, states in the Middle East)
Increased capacity of developing states to counter terrorism, corruption and transnational crime
More timely, coordinated, whole-of-government responses to international crises
A revitalized multilateralism, responding to the new challenges of globalization and putting outcomes ahead of processes
Renewed Multilateralism
More focused and better-coordinated Canadian contributions to democratic development internationally
Greater engagement with like-minded partners in the G8 as well as emerging economies such as Brazil, Russia, India and China
Strengthened relationships with rising powers (Brazil, Russia, India and China)
Enhanced relations with G8 partners (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, the United Kingdom) and the European Union
Stronger partnerships with key regional actors
A foreign ministry that is recognized as modern and agile
More effective leadership of, and coherence on, international policy issues and strategy
Better integration and management of the department's public diplomacy resources
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
|||
Year |
2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Total Planned Spending |
165.7 | 148.9 | 126.8 |
|
Human Resources (FTEs) |
|||
Year |
2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Total Planned Full Time Equivalents |
1,009 | 1,009 | 1,009 |
|
Strategic Priority 1: A strengthened North American partnership |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Milestones achieved marking negotiation progress; more agreements and fewer disputes |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
Strategic Priority 2: A more secure world for Canada and Canadians |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Increased international recognition of Canadian security assistance; tangible elimination of weapons and materials of mass destruction; increased capacity to plan and deliver whole-of-government responses to international crises; increased knowledge and capacity of developing states to take necessary measures to counter terrorism, corruption and transnational crime |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic Priority 4: Greater engagement with like-minded partners in the G8 as well as emerging economies such as Brazil, Russia, India and China |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Milestones achieved marking negotiation progress; progress in securing new networks |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic Priority 6: A modern foreign ministry |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Treasury Board Secretariat's Management Accountability Framework assessment; recognition of departmental leadership on administrative and management issues; progress in program and policy renewal; level of integration of corporate systems into decision-making processes; increase in number of political, economic relations and public affairs officers abroad |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Program Activity: managing and facilitating the presence of foreign diplomats in Canada as well as planning and leading official travel by the Governor General, the Prime Minister, Ministers of the Portfolio and all official diplomatic events.
In carrying out this activity, the department:
The department focuses the attention of the foreign diplomatic community in this country on opportunities for expanded political cooperation and economic ties between Canada and other nations as well as between Canada and its partners in multilateral organizations. In any given year, there are between 7,500 and 8,000 foreign diplomats, spouses and dependants accredited to, and resident in, Canada, representing 125 independent states. Each month, an estimated 200 foreign representatives arrive in Canada to begin assignments in diplomatic, consular and/or other bilateral or multilateral affairs while, at the same time, another 200 end their postings in this country. A regularly updated list of foreign representatives currently in Canada as well as their office addresses is available at http://w01.international.gc.ca/Protocol/pdf/DrsBook_2006_01_eng.pdf.
It should be noted that there are also 48 states that have non-resident diplomatic relations with Canada. Their diplomatic personnel are located in Washington, D.C., or New York City. An additional six independent states (Bahrain, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Swaziland and Turkmenistan) maintain diplomatic relations with Canada, but choose not to have personnel accredited to Canada at this time.
Planning Context: At a time when the number of foreign representatives in this country is larger than ever, the department continues to deal with resource pressures in providing high-quality services to its large and high-profile clientele.
Canadians are increasingly aware of security issues and the need for monitoring any alleged misbehaviour by foreign representatives. Currently, the department is in the midst of modernizing its processes, with particular emphasis on the security of the accreditation process for foreign representatives. In addition, there is a need to maintain and further strengthen relationships with, and train officers from, policing organizations, the Canada Border Services Agency, the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority, Citizenship and Immigration Canada, Canada Revenue Agency and other groups to ensure that Canada meets its obligations under the Vienna Conventions with regard to the privileges and immunities of accredited diplomats in this country.
The priorities are:
Each of the strategic priorities for this program activity is supported by one or more one- to three-year outcomes. The department will advance the achievement of these outcomes by taking the following actions:
Greater engagement with like-minded partners in the G8 as well as emerging economies such as Brazil, Russia, India and China
The department will:
A foreign ministry that is recognized as modern and agile
The department will:
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
|||
Year |
2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Total Planned Spending |
38.7 | 38 | 38 |
|
Human Resources (FTEs) |
|||
Year |
2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Total Planned Full Time Equivalents |
59 | 59 | 59 |
|
Strategic Priority 4: Greater engagement with like-minded partners in the G8 as well as emerging economies such as Brazil, Russia, India and China |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Progress in securing new networks |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic Priority 6: A modern foreign ministry |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Recognition of departmental leadership on administrative and management issues |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
|
Program Activity: managing and delivering Headquarters- and mission-provided common services to government programs and partners operating abroad.
In carrying out this activity, the department:
The physical resources and related services the department supplies abroad include chancery and official residence accommodation, Crown-owned staff quarters, asset and materiel management, property maintenance, and advice and policy development pertaining to property and materiel.
Canada's missions abroad also provide support to Australia and Sweden according to specific service agreements.
The department undertakes a whole-of-government, collaborative approach to common service delivery in order to:
Canada's representation abroad now consists of employees of the department and of 23 other federal departments and agencies and three provinces (Alberta, Ontario and Quebec), all pursuing policies and delivering programs to further Canadian interests. Federal partners with the most extensive engagement outside the country and Citizenship and Immigration Canada, the Canadian International Development Agency, the Department of National Defence and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. Other partners at missions abroad include Export Development Canada.
Planning Context: The department faces many challenges in managing its assets abroad. It continues to meet growing demands from Canadians for electronic service delivery and integrated client-centred services with expanded connections to external contacts in other departments, levels of government and outside organizations, while taking care to address the implicatoins related to information sharing and security.
Other issues facing the department's delivery of common services abroad include:
3 As shown in the department's PAA, common services and infrastructure are delivered as two distinct program activities, one from Headquarters and the other from missions abroad. Given the complementary nature of these two functions, they are discussed together in this report.
The priority is a foreign ministry that is recognized as modern and agile.
The strategic priority for this program activity is supported by one or more one- to three-year outcomes. The department will advance the achievement of this outcome by taking the following actions:
A foreign ministry that is recognized as modern and agile
The department will:
The department will also continue to provide the following services related to common services and infrastructure:
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
|||
Year |
2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Total Planned Spending |
843.5 | 764.2 | 732.9 |
|
Human Resources (FTEs) |
|||
Year |
2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Total Planned Full Time Equivalents |
5,713 | 5,713 | 5,709 |
|
Strategic Priority 6: A modern foreign ministry |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Treasury Board Secretariat's Management Accountability Framework assessment; recognition of departmental leadership on administrative and management issues; progress in program and policy renewal; level of integration of corporate systems into decision-making processes; increase in number of political, economic relations and public affairs officers abroad; agreement on special operating agency concept |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two activities contribute to this strategic outcome: Consular Affairs and Passport Canada.
Program Activity: managing and delivering consular services to Canadians.
In carrying out this program activity, the department:
Of the department's 299 points of service abroad, the Consular Program offers services at 265 locations outside Canada-at 152 missions (embassies, high commissions, permanent missions, consulates general, consulates, offices and representative offices); 97 consulates headed by honorary consuls; and 16 locations where service is provided by the Australian and Swedish governments, according to consular sharing agreements between Canada and these countries.
At missions abroad, consular staff manage individual consular cases, provide emergency responses during major incidents and crises, and deliver other services such as provision of passports, citizenship services, legal and notarial assistance and help in voting in Canadian elections, in consultation with Headquarters.
The department also manages the Honorary Consul Program abroad. Honorary consuls provide a first line of emergency consular assistance and carry out certain routine consular services. They often play an important role in the development of commercial and economic relations, and may also engage in public affairs, representational work and other activities related to Canadian interests abroad. Experience has proven that they provide exceptional service to Canadians at a reasonable cost.
While most Canadians do not encounter problems abroad, consular assistance can be vitally important for those who do. Such assistance can take many forms. However, all consular interventions serve two basic-and vitally important- purposes: protection and assistance. Serious consular cases, which tend to attract media and public attention, have the potential to generate bilateral and/or multilateral foreign policy issues.
Consular services are supported by a number of fees paid by the travelling public. These include a portion ($25) of the charge for passports and other travel documents as well as specialized fees for notarial, legal and other services (see http://www.voyage.gc.ca/main/about/consular_fees-en.asp). All fees collected are used to maintain and improve Canadian consular services around the world. Last year, revenue generated by these fees was as follows: $58 million for passports and other travel documents and $2.9 million for notarial, legal and other services.
Planning Context: Canadians are more and more engaged in the international community. Approximately 2.5 million Canadians reside outside Canada, and each year Canadians make more than 40 million trips abroad. In 2005, the department received over 1.2 million requests for services from Canadians abroad. In addition, the consular website attracted 4 million visitors.
Several factors continue to have an impact on the department's Consular Program, including:
Strengthened consular and passport services, able to respond rapidly and flexibly, is a key priority of the department and a main focus of the Consular Affairs program activity.
The strategic priority for this program activity is supported by one or more one- to three-year outcomes. The department will advance the achievement of this outcome by taking the following actions:
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
|||
Year |
2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Total Planned Spending |
51.7 | 46.7 | 46.7 |
|
Human Resources (FTEs) |
|||
Year |
2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Total Planned Full Time Equivalents |
405 | 405 | 405 |
|
Strategic Priority 5: Strengthened consular services |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Client satisfaction ratings; the extent to which citizenship applications are reviewed and forwarded to the Registrar of Citizenship within the 10-day Service Standard; extent to which contact with detainees meets the Service Standards; passport services; results of focus-group testing and a national survey designed to better understand consular clients; and results of employee surveys on the new strategy for consular services |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Program Activity: managing and delivering passport services to Canadians (through use of the Passport Revolving Fund).
Passport Canada is responsible for the issuance, revocation, refusal, recovery and use of Canadian passports. It provides guidance to the department's missions about issuing passports abroad and supervises all matters related to Canadian travel documents. Passport Canada provides travel documents featuring the best in anti-fraud protection, while maintaining a high level of client service.
Funding for the operations of Passport Canada, a special operating agency of the department, is generated by fees charged for its services. In this regard, it is much like a private-sector enterprise.
Passport Canada offers over-the-counter services at its 33 issuing offices across the country and at designated outlets of Canada Post, Human Resources and Skills Development Canada and Service Canada, which serve as receiving agents (for locations see http://www.pptc.gc.ca/service/index.aspx?lang=e). Service by mail is also provided. Online applications forms are available athttp://www.pptc.gc.ca/service/index.aspx?lang=e. Outside the country, Passport Canada services are available through Government of Canada missions.
Passport Canada works closely with:
Collaboration with foreign passport authorities enables Passport Canada to share best practices, which in turn improves its planning and management strategies.
Planning Context: There has been a significant shift in the policy framework in which Passport Canada operates. While continuing to meet its service delivery standards, the focus has now been expanded to include security, in keeping with the government's National Security Policy.
To address increased risks of terrorism and identity theft, Passport Canada continues to work on implementing newgeneration passport security measures, systems and controls. It is also working to comply with ICAO standards for passports, which were adopted in May 2003. These include requirements for computer chip-enabled passports (known as e-passports) that enable the use of biometric technologies in confirming a traveller's identity.
There continues to be a significant increase in the demand for passports and other travel documents by Canadians. In fact, demand is expected to almost double between 2003-2004 and 2008-2009, adding pressure to Passport Canada's ability to respond to both security and service challenges. New partners, such as Service Canada outlets, will improve access to services, but longer-term solutions are also needed. Extended hours and a new risk-based approach to managing applications from previous passport holders should help to relieve some of the pressure during peak periods.
To meet heightened security requirements and greatly increased demand for service, Passport Canada has grown by almost 150 percent over the past five years. Growth is expected to continue, although not necessarily at the same rate. Expansion of this magnitude has exerted financial pressures on the agency and increased the need for more employee orientation and training, office space and equipment.
The priorities are:
Each of the strategic priorities for this program activity is supported by one or more one- to three-year outcomes. Passport Canada will advance the achievement of these outcomes by taking the following actions, listed below by strategic priority.
A more secure world for Canada and Canadians, safer from the threats of failed and fragile states, terrorism, transnational crime and weapons of mass destruction
Passport Canada will ensure that the Canadian passport continues to be internationally respected as a reliable and secure travel document by strengthening its operations as follows:
Strengthened passport services, able to respond rapidly and flexibly
Passport Canada will provide simplified access for passport services by:
Financial Resources ($ millions) |
|||
Year |
2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Total Planned Spending |
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Human Resources (FTEs) |
|||
Year |
2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Total Planned Full Time Equivalents |
1,915 | 2,069 | 2,372 |
|
Strategic Priority 2: A more secure world for Canada and Canadians |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Enhanced security control procedures |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
Strategic Priority 5: Strengthened passport services |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Client satisfaction ratings |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
|
Supporting Activity (Corporate Services): providing finance and planning, information management and technology, accommodation and security services at Headquarters as well as executive, audit and communications services that enable the department to conduct its program activities.
Supporting Activity (Human Resources): providing human resources services that enable the department to conduct its program activities.
Corporate Services and Human Resources provide essential enabling infrastructure to the department. The two branches are responsible for:
In essence, Corporate Services and Human Resources ensure that the right people are in the right places throughout the department and that employees are fully supported with the appropriate training, equipment, accommodation, systems and administration.
Planning Context: The following factors affect this work:
The priority is a foreign ministry that is recognized as modern and agile.
The strategic priority for this program activity is supported by one or more one- to three-year outcomes. The department will advance the achievement of this outcome by taking the following actions:
A foreign ministry that is recognized as modern and agile
The department will:
Financial resources of Corporate Services and Human Resources are applied against all program activities.
Strategic Priority 6: A modern foreign ministry |
|
Key Priority Indicators: Treasury Board Secreatariat's Management Accountability Framework Assessment; recognition of departmental leadership on administrative and management issues; progress in program and policy renewal; level of integration of corporate systems into decision-making processes; increase in number of political, economic relations and public affairs officers abroad; agreement on special operating agency concept |
|
1- to 3-year planned outcomes |
As demonstrated by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision of other critical services that apply horizontally across all program activities:
|
|
|
List of Tables
Table 3.1: Planned Spending and Full Time Equivalents (FTEs)
Table 3.2: Resources by Program Activity
Table 3.3: Voted and Statutory Items Listed in the Main Estimates
Table 3.4: Services Received Without Charge
Table 3.5: Summary of Capital Spending by Program Activity
Table 3.6: Source of Respendable and Non-Respendable Revenue
Table 3.8: Resource Requirements by Branch or Sector
Table 3.10: Major Regulatory Initiatives
Table 3.11: Details on Project Spending
Table 3.12: Details on Transfer Payments Programs
Table 3.13: Horizontal Initiatives
Table 3.14: Sustainable Development Strategies
Table 3.15: Internal Audits and Evaluation
Table 3.2: Resources by Program Activity ($ millions) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006-2007 | |||||||||||
Budgetary | Non- Budgetary |
Total Main Estimates |
Adjustments (planned spending not in Main Estimates)- |
Total Planned Spending |
|||||||
Program Activity | Operating | Capital | Grants | Contributions and Other Transfer Payments |
Gross | Respend- able Revenue |
Net | Loans, Investments and Advances |
|||
International Security | 105.1 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 244.6 | 358.7 | 0.0 | 358.7 | 0.0 | 358.7 | 2.3 | 361.0 |
|
|||||||||||
Global Issues | 66.8 | 2.9 | 7.5 | 428.5 | 505.7 | 0.0 | 505.7 | 0.0 | 505.7 | 7.3 | 513.0 |
|
|||||||||||
Strategic Policy and Public Diplomacy | 22.3 | 0.7 | 21.3 | 3.1 | 47.4 | (2.6) | 44.8 | 0.0 | 44.8 | 1.6 | 46.4 |
|
|||||||||||
Protocol | 27.6 | 0.4 | 10.6 | 0.0 | 38.6 | 0.0 | 38.6 | 0.0 | 38.6 | 0.1 | 38.7 |
|
|||||||||||
Common Services and Infrastructure (Support from HQ) | 145.8 | 59.6 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 205.7 | (17.8) | 187.9 | 0.0 | 187.9 | 24.9 | 212.8 |
|
|||||||||||
Common Services and Infrastructure (Missions Abroad) | 615.0 | 35.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 650.7 | (29.1) | 621.6 | 0.0 | 621.6 | 9.1 | 630.7 |
|
|||||||||||
Consular Affairs | 49.8 | 2.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 52.7 | (3.0) | 49.7 | 0.0 | 49.7 | 2.0 | 51.7 |
|
|||||||||||
Passport Services | 198.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 198.1 | (198.1) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 |
Total |
1,357.0 | 115.7 | 42.7 | 676.2 | 2,191.7 | (250.6) | 1,941.1 | 0.0 | 1,941.1 | 79.0 | 2,020.1 |
Note: Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown. | |||||||||||
Table 3.3: Voted and Statutory Items($ millions) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Vote or Statutory Item |
2006-2007 Main Estimates |
2005-2006 Main Estimates |
|
1 | Operating expenditures | 1,025.8 | 990.9 |
5 | Capital expenditures | 115.7 | 105.0 |
10 | Grants and contributions | 718.7 | 642.9 |
(S) | Minister of Foreign Affairs salary and motor car allowances |
0.1 | 0.1 |
(S) | Payment under the Diplomatic Service (Special) Superannuation Act |
0.3 | 0.3 |
(S) | Contributions to employee benefit plans | 80.5 | 59.5 |
Total Department |
1,941.1 | 1,798.7 | |
Note: Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown. | |||
Table 3.4: Services Received Without Charge ($ millions) | |
---|---|
2006-2007 | Total |
Accommodation provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) | 21.4 |
|
|
Contributions covering the employer's share of employees' insurance premiums and expenditures paid by the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) (excluding revolving funds) | 45.6 |
|
|
Workers' compensation coverage provided by Human Resources and Skills Development Canada (HRSDC) | 0.2 |
|
|
Salary and associated expenditures of legal services provided by the Department of Justice Canada (JUS) | 1.8 |
|
|
Other | 0.0 |
Total 2006–2007 Services Received Without Charge |
69.0 |
Note: Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown. | |
Table 3.5: Summary of Capital Spending by Program Activity ($ millions) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity | Forecast Spending 2005-2006 |
Planned Spending 2006-2007 |
Planned Spending 2007-2008 |
Planned Spending 2008-2009 |
International Security | 0.0 | 6.0 | 5.8 | 5.7 |
|
||||
Global Issues | 4.2 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
|
||||
Bilateral Relations | 7.6 | 7.5 | 6.8 | 6.8 |
|
||||
Strategic Policy and Public Diplomacy | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
|
||||
Protocol | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
|
||||
Common Services and Infrastructure (Support from HQ) | 51.8 | 82.6 | 61.6 | 37.2 |
|
||||
Common Services and Infrastructure (Missions Abroad) | 38.0 | 35.7 | 34.1 | 34.0 |
|
||||
Consular Affairs | 2.7 | 4.1 | 2.7 | 2.7 |
|
||||
Passport Services | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Total |
105.0 | 139.9 | 114.1 | 89.2 |
Note: Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown. | ||||
Table 3.6: Source of Respendable and Non-Respendable Revenue ($ millions) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Non-Respendable Revenue | Forecast Revenue 2005-2006 |
Planned Revenue 2006-2007 |
Planned Revenue 2007-2008 |
Planned Revenue 2008-2009 |
Common Services and Infrastructure (Support from HQ) | ||||
|
||||
Adjustment to previous year's expenditures | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
|
||||
Other | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | |
Common Services and Infrastructure (Missions Abroad) | ||||
|
||||
Sales of properties and other assets | 16.1 | 13.8 | 14.7 | 10.0 |
|
||||
Employee rent shares | 12.2 | 12.2 | 12.2 | 12.2 |
|
||||
Services provided to the Passport Office | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.4 |
|
||||
Adjustment to previous year's expenditures | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
|
||||
Other | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
35.9 | 33.6 | 34.5 | 29.8 | |
Consular Affairs | ||||
|
||||
Consular fees | 66.0 | 66.5 | 72.7 | 92.3 |
66.0 | 66.5 | 72.7 | 92.3 | |
Total Non-Respendable Revenue | 102.7 | 100.9 | 108.0 | 122.9 |
Total Respendable and Non-Respendable Revenue |
351.4 | 350.7 | 376.0 | 451.9 |
Note: Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown. | ||||
Table 3.8: Resource Requirements by Branch ($ millions) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity | |||||||||
Branch | International Security |
Global Issues |
Bilateral Relations |
Strategic Policy and Public Diplomacy |
Protocol | Common Services and infrastructure (support from HQ) |
Common Services and infrastructure (Missions Abroad) |
Consular Affairs |
Total Planned Spending |
Minister and Deputy Minister's Office | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 4.3 |
|
|||||||||
Bureaus Reporting Directly to the Deputy Minister | 1.2 | 0.8 | 3.1 | 0.5 | 32.6 | 2.3 | 11.3 | 1.0 | 52.7 |
|
|||||||||
International Security | 320.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 320.0 |
|
|||||||||
Global Issues | 0.0 | 478.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 17.2 | 0.0 | 495.4 |
|
|||||||||
Bilateral Relations | 0.7 | 15.2 | 99.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 452.4 | 28.8 | 596.7 |
|
|||||||||
North America | 0.0 | 0.0 | 26.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 106.2 | 11.8 | 144.9 |
|
|||||||||
Strategic Policy and Public Diplomacy | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 40.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 40.1 |
|
|||||||||
Legal Adviser | 9.0 | 4.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 14.2 |
|
|||||||||
Corporate Services | 22.2 | 9.7 | 23.3 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 171.1 | 30.2 | 5.1 | 269.8 |
|
|||||||||
Human Resources | 7.7 | 4.9 | 11.6 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 38..8 | 12.0 | 3.6 | 81.8 |
|
|||||||||
Passport Canada | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Total | 361.0 | 513.0 | 165.7 | 46.4 | 38.7 | 212.8 | 630.7 | 51.7 | 2,020.0 |
Note: Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown. | |||||||||
Table 3.9: User Fees |
---|
Name of User Fee Property-Related Lettings and Sublettings |
|
Fee Type: (O) Other - Cost Recovery (Lease of Public Property) |
|
Fee-Setting Authority: Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Act, FAA, TB Cost Recovery and Charging Policy, 1997 TB decision on Net Voting, TB Real Property Revenue Policy. |
|
Reason for Fee Introduction or Amendment: This fee is modified as per each agreement to reflect market value. |
|
Effective Date of Planned Change to Take Effect: As per terms of each agreement. |
|
Planned Consultation & Review Process: The fees are negotiated as part of a specific agreement with each licensee/sublessee and in relation to each property for a specific time period. At the expiry of each agreement, the terms and fees are renegotiated to reflect market value. |
Table 3.10: Major Regulatory Initiatives |
---|
Regulations: Put into force the Law on Space Remote Sensing Systems and related regulations. |
Expected Results: Promulgating regulations and bringing the Remote Sensing Space Systems Act into force will fulfill commitments Canada made under an agreement with the United States to regulate commercial remote sensing satellite systems (Canada Treaty Series 2000/14, Washington, D.C., June 2000). The Act will establish a licensing regime to operate such systems in Canada. |
Table 3.11: Details on Project Spending |
---|
The following projects have exceeded or are expected to exceed their delegated project approval level over the next three years: |
2006-2007 |
|
2007-2008 |
|
2008-2009 |
|
|
For further information, see http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp. |
Table 3.12: Details on Transfer Payments Programs |
---|
Over the next three years, Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade will manage the following transfer payment programs in excess of $5 million: |
2006-2007 |
Program Activity: International Security
|
2007-2008 |
Program Activity: International Security
|
2008-2009 |
Program Activity: International Security
|
|
For further information on the above-mentioned transfer payment programs see http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp. |
Table 3.13A: Horizontal Initiatives |
---|
Name of Horizontal Initiative: U.S. Enhanced Representation Initiative (ERI) |
Lead Department: Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade |
Start Date: September 17, 2003 |
End Date: March 31, 2008 |
Total Federal Funding Allocation: $118.2 million |
Description of the Initiative: The ERI is a partnership of eight federal departments and agencies. The ERI provides a coordinated and integrated approach and direction to managing and advancing Canada's advocacy, trade, business development, science and technology, and investment interests in the United States. This is done through the collaboration of ERI partners and consultation with other federal government departments, provinces and territories, and other stakeholders. When fully implemented, the ERI partnership will oversee a network of 43 U.S. points of contact through consulates general, consulates, trade offices and honorary consuls. |
Shared Outcome(s): Outcomes reflect total Canadian government efforts respecting advocacy and business development with the United States set in the international economic environment. Specific outcomes are defined by the ERI's Resultsbased Management and Accountability Framework (RMAF): Short-term Outcomes:
|
Governance structure(s): The ERI Partnership is managed through a formal governance structure including a Deputy Ministers Steering Committee, an Assistant Deputy Ministers Policy Committee, a Directors General Operations Committee and three director-level Standing Committees: Advocacy and Business Development, Communications and Human Resources. Day-to-day operations are managed by the ERI Secretariat, which is responsible to the ERI Partnership, through the governance structure, for planning, implementing and evaluating the ERI's annual action plan. The ERI Secretariat is accountable administratively to its host department, the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, which provides financial, human resources and physical resource services to the Secretariat. |
|
For further information on the above-mentioned transfer payment programs see http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp. |
Table 3.13: Horizontal Initiative | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name of Horizontal Initiative: U.S. Enhanced Representation Initiative (ERI) | |||||
Federal Partners Involved in Each Program |
Names of Programs | Total Allocation ($ millions) |
Planned Spending 2006-2007 ($ millions) |
Expected Results for 2006-2007 |
|
1. | Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) | a. Representation | 78,070.0 | 20,269.0 | Complete staffing |
2. | Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) |
|
|||
3. | Canada Economic Development for Quebec regions (CED-Q) | b. Advocacy and Business Development | 24,837.0 | 7,450.0 | "whole of government approach" |
4. | Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) |
|
|||
5. | Industry Canada (IC) | c. Corporate / Governance | 8,248.0 | 2,047.0 | Formative evaluation - complete and implement recommendations |
6. | National Research Council (NRC) |
|
|||
7. | Western Economic Diversification (WD) | d. Reserve / Unallocated* | 7,045.0 | 11,687.0 | |
Total | 118,200.0 | 41,453.0 | |||
Contact Information: Wolf Nowak Manager Strategic Planning and Analysis U.S. Enhanced Representation Initiative Secretariat (ERI) Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) Telephone: 1-613-944-2715 Note: To be allocated to programs by March 31, 2006. |
|||||
Table 3.14: Sustainable Development Strategy Department |
---|
1. How does your department plan to incorporate Sustainable Development (SD) principles and values into your mission, vision, policy and
day-to-day operations? Departmental Input |
2. What goals, objectives and targets from your most recent SDS will you be focusing on this coming year? How will you measure your success? The targets in Agenda 2006 specific to Foreign Affairs in the remaining months of 2006 are listed below and are measured or reported on through an annual report. The targets for 2007 through 2009 will be captured in an updated sustainable development strategy that will be tabled in Parliament in December 2006.
|
3. Identify any sustainable development tools, such as Strategic Environmental Assessment or Environmental Management Systems that will be applied over the next year. The department has a variety of sustainable development tools in place that will continue to be applicable over the next year. Some of the tools include Strategic Environmental Assessment of Policies Plans and Programs, Environmental Assessment of Projects, Environmental Assessment of Grants and Contributions as well as an Environmental Management System. |
Table 3.15: Internal Audits and Evaluations | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Foreign Affairs Audit Plans for 2005-2007 - Modified for input into the 2006-2007 Report on Plans and Priorities | ||||
General Headquarters Audit | ||||
Project | Description / Objective | 2005-2006 | 2006-2007 | Time Frame |
Audit of the Integrated Management of Property Resources (IMPR) | To assess the extent to which the objectives for the IMPR redistribution fund have been met. | X | 3rd - 4th Quarter | |
|
||||
Audit of Foreign Service Expenditures - Foreign Service Directives | Phase one - Preliminary survey and risk assessment. | X | 3rd - 4th Quarter | |
|
||||
Assurance Engagement | Phase two - Execution of plan. | X | TBD | |
|
||||
Locally Engaged Staff Services Bureau | To assess the efficiency and effectiveness of the management control framework. | X | TBD | |
|
||||
Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Assurance Engagement |
To determine if Foreign Affairs has implemented the PIA policy with due regard to effectiveness and is conducting PIAs in compliance with the policy. | X | TBD | |
Financial Audits | ||||
Project | Description / Objective | 2005-2006 | 2006-2007 | Time Frame |
Follow-up of Assurance Audits Assurance Engagement |
To determine the extent to which recommendations resulting from six financial audits performed over the past several years have been implemented. The six audits were: Cashier's Office; Accountable Advances; Accounts Receivable; Specified Purpose Accounts; Capital Assets; and Prepaid Expenses. | X | 3rd Quarter | |
|
||||
Audit of Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities Assurance Engagement |
To determine the extent to which Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities are being accounted for in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and that internal controls are in place and working effectively. | X | 4th Quarter | |
Table 3.15: Internal Audits and Evaluations | ||||
Financial Audits | ||||
Project | Description / Objective | 2005-2006 | 2006-2007 | Time Frame |
Audit of Recoverable / Payables Assurance Engagement |
To determine the extent to which the handling of other government department (OGD) transactions at missions are accurate and consistent, as well as how these amounts are recovered/paid through HQ from/to our partner departments. | X | 1st Quarter | |
|
||||
Audit of Foreign Affairs Financial Functions at Missions Abroad and HQ Assurance Engagement |
To determine the extent to which the department has sufficient financial expertise at missions and HQ. The audit will include an examination of the position qualifications, recruiting methods and training program. | X | 2nd Quarter | |
|
||||
Audit of Foreign Operations and International Banking | To determine the extent to which the Foreign Operations and International Banking Division: | X | 3rd - 4th Quarter | |
|
||||
Assurance Engagement |
|
|||
Information Management Audit | ||||
Project | Description / Objective | 2005-2006 | 2006-2007 | Time Frame |
Audit of Network "Content" Security Assurance Engagement |
The broad objective of this audit is to provide assurance of the integrity of the information on internal computer networks. More specifically, the audit will:
|
X | 3rd - 4th Quarter | |
|
||||
Management of IT Security (MITS) Assurance Engagement |
This audit addresses a component of the audit of IT security required under the TBS initiatives promoted through the MITS. This internal audit would be conducted to meet TBS and Office of the Auditor General requirements and would involve coordination of criteria and methodologies with both agencies. |
X | 3rd Quarter | |
|
||||
Post-Implementation Audit of InfoBank Assurance Engagement |
To review user requirements and system functionality and to evaluate the success of the project for departmental management. | X | 1st Quarter | |
Grants and Contributions Program Audits | ||||
Project | Description / Objective | 2005-2006 | 2006-2007 | Time Frame |
Academic Relations | X | 1st Quarter | ||
|
||||
Canada Fund | X | 3rd Quarter | ||
|
||||
Canadian Foundation for the Americas | X | 3rd - 4th Quarter | ||
|
||||
Canadian Interests Abroad | X | 3rd - 4th Quarter | ||
|
||||
Counter-Terrorism | X | X | TBD | |
|
||||
Global Partnership Program | To provide assurance on the proper management and administration of departmental grants and contributions. | X | 3rd Quarter | |
|
||||
Assurance engagements | X | 2nd Quarter | ||
|
||||
Grants in Lieu of Taxes | X | 3rd - 4th Quarter | ||
|
||||
Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission | X | 3rd - 4th Quarter | ||
|
||||
International Drug Strategy | X | 3rd - 4th Quarter | ||
|
||||
UN Environment Programme (UNEP) | X | 3rd - 4th Quarter | ||
Grants and Contributions Recipient Audits | ||||
Project | Description / Objective | 2005-2006 | 2006-2007 | Time Frame |
Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada | X | 3rd - 4th Quarter | ||
X | - | |||
|
||||
Canada Fund | X | TBD | ||
|
||||
Canada Landmine Fund | To determine the extent of recipient's compliance with the terms and conditions of the agreement and ensure that financial reports appropriately account for the use of funds while demonstrating that funds were used for the intended purpose and that value has been received. | X | 1st - 4th Quarter | |
Assurance engagements |
X | |||
|
||||
Clean Development Mechanism and Joint Implementation Office | X | X | 1st - 4th Quarter | |
|
||||
Counter-Terrorism | X | TBD | ||
|
||||
Global Partnership Program | X | 1st - 4th Quarter | ||
|
||||
Human Security Program | X | X | 1st - 4th Quarter | |
|
||||
International Environmental Program | X | X | 1st - 4th Quarter | |
|
||||
John Holmes Fund | X | 3rd Quarter | ||
X | 1st - 4th Quarter | |||
|
||||
Maison des étudiants canadiens | X | 3rd - 4th Quarter | ||
X | - | |||
|
||||
Northern Dimensions | X | X | 1st - 4th Quarter | |
Mission Inspections | ||||
Project | Description / Objective | 2005-2006 | 2006-2007 | Time Frame |
Young Professionals International | X | X | 1st - 4th Quarter | |
Mission Inspections | To provide management with an assessment of mission operations and management controls. These engagements provide advice to missions, examine compliance with policies and regulations, and examine methods to enhance performance. | |||
|
||||
Consulting Engagements | Over the course of several mission inspections, work will be conducted that targets, on a risk basis, particular horizontal processes, subjects, issues and questions. The results of the inspections will be accumulated and analyzed to enable the development of statements of assurance on the selected horizontal topics. | |||
|
||||
Inspection Tours | Accra, London, Madrid, Barcelona, Athens | X | 1st -2nd Quarter | |
|
||||
Bandar Seri Begawan, Bangkok, Jakarta, Abu Dhabi, Dubai | X | 3rd Quarter | ||
|
||||
Riga, Tallinn, Vilnius | X | 4th Quarter | ||
|
||||
Bucharest, Tel Aviv, Ramallah, Tunisia, Tripoli | X | 4th Quarter | ||
|
||||
Seoul, Taipei, Colombo | X | 4th Quarter | ||
|
||||
Kuwait, Riyadh, Kuala Lumpur | X | 1st Quarter | ||
|
||||
Washington, Wash-OAS, Philadelphia | X | 1st Quarter | ||
|
||||
Moscow, St. Petersburg, Almaty | X | 2nd Quarter | ||
|
||||
Brasilia, São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Belo Horizonte, Buffalo | X | 3rd Quarter | ||
|
||||
Dakar, Yaoundé, Geneva | X | 3rd Quarter | ||
|
||||
Minneapolis, Seattle | X | 4th Quarter | ||
|
||||
Helsinki, Warsaw, Prague, Bratislava | X | 4th Quarter | ||
|
||||
Havana, Port of Spain, Bogotá | X | 4th Quarter | ||
|
||||
Passport Audits | ||||
Project | Description / Objective | 2005-2006 | 2006-2007 | Time Frame |
Entitlement Policy and Procedures Control Framework Assurance Engagement |
To determine the adequacy of the entitlement policies and procedures and the effectiveness of the related control framework. | X | TBD | |
|
||||
Management of IT Security (MITS) | This audit addresses a component of the audit of IT security required under the TBS initiatives promoted through the MITS. | X | 3rd Quarter | |
|
||||
Assurance Engagement | This internal audit would be conducted to meet TBS and Office of the Auditor General requirements and would involve coordination of criteria and methodologies with both agencies | |||
|
||||
Passport Services at Missions and HQ Framework | To assess the level of compliance with policies and procedures at missions abroad and review the efficiency of the management control framework. | X | 3rd - 4th Quarter | |
|
||||
Assurance Engagement | The audit will be conducted at both Passport Canada and Consular Affairs, Foreign Affairs. |
Internal Evaluations Foreign Affairs Evaluations Planned for 2006-2007 |
|||||
Name of Evaluation | Description | 2005-2006 | 2006-2007 | Start Date | End Date |
Canada Post Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) | This evaluation will review the relevance and effectiveness of the MOU between Passport Canada and Canada Post for the delivery of passports and other services. | X | September 2006 |
December 2006 |
|
|
|||||
Canadian Foreign Service Institute (CFSI) | This analysis provides an indepth review of the CFSI after 15 years of operation: its relevance, cost-effectiveness and results achieved. Recommendations will aim to guide management in revitalizing the mandate of the Institute to meet the challenges of a new international environment. | X | August 2005 |
May 2006 |
|
|
|||||
Communications Policy | This evaluation will review the department's implementation of the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada. | X | September 2006 |
March 2007 |
|
|
|||||
Counter-Terrorism | Programming and Results Reporting Capacity Check to assess the capacity of the Counter-Terrorism Funding Program to plan, coordinate, manage, achieve and demonstrate results consistent with departmental strategies and priorities. | X | May 2006 |
July 2006 |
|
|
|||||
Evaluation of the Counter- Terrorism Program to review overall planning, programming and RMAF implementation. | X | January 2007 |
June 2007 |
||
|
|||||
Country Studies | Development and validation of a methodology for country studies. In support of the "whole of government" approach, the country studies will be comprehensive reviews of our involvement with the selected countries from both a Headquarters and a field perspective. They will aim to show how our various programs contribute to reaching our goals. | X | May 2006 |
January 2007 |
|
|
|||||
The Evaluation Division will pilot test the methodology and tools developed by completing a country study in a country where the planning has been in place. | X | January 2007 |
July 2007 |
||
Enhanced Representation Initiative (ERI)-USA | This evaluation will look at the design and quality of the implementation of the initiative. It will also assess the effectiveness of the ERI as a horizontal initiative (governance and coordination). | X | July 2005 |
May 2006 |
|
|
|||||
Foreign Affairs Human Resources Needs | This study will consider what skills and experience are required to meet the department's needs for the future. | X | September 2006 |
March 2007 |
|
|
|||||
Global Partnership Program | Evaluation of the Global Partnership Program as a whole with a focus on planning, programming and RMAF implementation. | X | December 2005 |
April 2006 |
|
|
|||||
Update of the RMAF/RBAF for the Global Partnership Program. | X | April 2006 |
May 2006 |
||
|
|||||
Evaluation of the Former Weapons Scientists Programs to assess the International Science and Technology Centre's efficiency, effectiveness and achievement of results. | X | April 2006 |
July 2006 |
||
|
|||||
Global Partnership Program | Evaluation of the Chemical Weapons Destruction Program / Main Destruction Building-2 (MDB2) and the work with the United Kingdom Ministry of Defence. | X | August 2006 |
December 2006 |
|
|
|||||
Evaluation of the Nuclear Security and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) component of the Global Partnership Program. | X | June 2006 |
October 2006 |
||
|
|||||
Hub and Spoke | This review will assess the effectiveness of the existing delivery models in different regions and identify the factors that facilitate and impede the success of the Hub and Spoke approach (i.e. relations between main and satellite offices). | X | September 2006 |
March 2007 |
|
|
|||||
Knowledge Management | As a follow-up to the IM/IT (Information Management, Information Technology) Needs Analysis Study, this study will examine how the department acquires, organizes, stores and disseminates knowledge in order to provide recommendations on how to improve knowledge management. | X | April 2006 |
December 2006 |
|
|
|||||
Landmines | The summative evaluation of the Canadian Landmine Fund will be led by CIDA and will cover the contributions by Foreign Affairs, CIDA and DND. An evaluation assessment will be conducted in FY 2005-2006, followed by the summative evaluation in 2006-2007. | X | May 2005 |
April 2007 |
|
|
|||||
Passport Canada (PPTC) Ombudsman | This evaluation will consider alternative options for delivering the ombudsman function and other values and ethics oriented services within PPTC, with a focus on organizational capacity renewal and sustainability. | X | April 2006 |
November 2006 |
|
|
|||||
Passport Canada (PPTC) Security Bureau | This evaluation will review the relevance, effectiveness and results achieved by the Security Bureau and consider alternatives to continue to provide an effective travel documents service to Canadians while maintaining adequate security. | X | June 2006 |
December 2006 |
|
|
|||||
Policy Development | Advise and Assist: the review is about assessing the departmental policymaking process and how effectively the policies are translated into appropriate programming. | X | September 2006 |
March 2007 |
|
|
|||||
Public Diplomacy | Public Diplomacy is a new business line that comprises a variety of programs aimed at strengthening departmental advocacy activities. The evaluation will assess progress made toward a more coherent approach and will identify gaps between delivery capacity and the objectives of the Public Diplomacy program. | X | May 2006 |
March 2007 |
|
|
|||||
Public Security and Anti- Terrorism | Evaluation of the Public Security and Anti-Terrorism Program with a focus on the following components: Personal Safety and Security at Missions; Representation Abroad; and International Counter-Terrorism Unit. | X | May 2005 |
June 2006 |
|
|
|||||
Young Professionals International | Summative evaluation of the Young Professionals International Program. | X | September 2005 |
April 2006 |
|
This part of the report deals exclusively with the department's international trade component.
The department collaborates extensively with partners inside and outside government to foster coherence of Canada's commercial policies and programs in order to enhance the prosperity of Canadians. Strategic outcome and program activities in relation to international trade are identified in the table below.
Strategic Outcome: Canada's international commercial interests are advanced, both in Canada and abroad, in collaboration with Canadian business and other stakeholders. | |||||
Program Activities: |
World Markets/Commercial Relations, which integrates Canada's economic, trade, investment, and science and technology interests at regional and bilateral levels, and manages bilateral commercial interests.
International Business Development, which manages and delivers international business services to Canadians.
Promotion of Foreign Direct Investment and S&T Cooperation, which attracts and retains foreign direct investment (FDI) in Canada, expands Canadian investment abroad and fosters international science and technology collaboration.
The department's Corporate Services and Human Resources functions also support this strategic outcome.
The department's priorities are in keeping with the April 2006 Speech from the Throne, which noted:
The department's strategic outcome and program activities align with Government of Canada outcomes identified in Canada's Performance, an annual report to Parliament on the federal government's performance, prepared by Treasury Board. Of particular relevance is that document's outcome, A Prosperous Canada through Global Commerce.
At the corporate level, the business planning process is initiated at a fall retreat held by Executive Committee, at which members agree on a clear set of priorities and strategic objectives. These are articulated in a broadcast message and set of instructions to all members of the department's management at Headquarters and missions abroad. The country strategies prepared by the department's foreign affairs component provide the overall context in which the trade component's commercial programs operate abroad.
Program managers at Headquarters and abroad are provided with a business planning framework featuring specific performance measurement indicators on which to base their business plans. The plans identify resource use, the economic context within their respective territories, related activities and expected results. These plans form the basis of a dialogue with partner departments on policy and program priorities and resource requirements.
Over the past three years, Internet-based templates have been used for business plans, which has brought a degree of efficiency previously unknown and provided a better means of comparing plans across various markets. The department ensures coherence and completeness of all business plans, as well as a correlation with overall departmental priorities and key results.
The department is increasing its collaboration with other departments to develop credible performance indicators, primarily through use of the department's electronic client relationship management system known as TRIO and through a linkage of TRIO with the Virtual Trade Commissioner (VTC) web platform. TRIO provides integrated solutions to trade officers in order to improve the processing, delivery and tracking of interactions with clients. The system generates performance indicators such as average turnaround time on service requests, volume of services delivered and number of business leads generated.
The department uses its approved plans and strategies as the basic material for its Report on Plans and Priorities. This report, which is a compilation and explanation of the department's annual business plans, is an official element in the Estimates process. Like its counterpart, the Departmental Performance Report, this document is tabled in Parliament and is made available to all Canadians and others with an interest in Canada's trade policy.
The complexity and volatility of the international environment in which the department operates poses a number of challenges and risks-both strategic and operational-that must be identified and considered in its annual planning cycle.
The challenges facing the department include:
The department identifies and closely monitors risks associated with its mandate on an ongoing basis. This work is based on the Treasury Board framework (http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pubs_pol/dcgpubs/RiskManagement/rmf-cgr01-1-eng.asp#An%20Integrated%20Risk), which helps departments identify, manage and communicate risk from an organization-wide perspective.
Currently, the department has a large number of risk mitigation strategies in place for certain programs and overall operations. However, more work needs to be done in this area, given that some elements of the department still use informal methods of risk assessment and management. As its policy and program capacity is strengthened, the department continues to make progress in improving its assessment, management and communication of risks.
At present, the main strategic risks for the department are as follows:
Major Publications of Relevance to International Trade
Over the past year, a number of publications have addressed the future direction of Canadian economic policy, as follows:
Major Horizontal Files Involving the Department
In addition to the many trade policy files that regularly involve a range of other government departments, the department is involved in the following specific horizontal files:
The department is currently developing a global commerce strategy for engagement in priority markets, which encompasses trade policy, export development, investment flows, science and technology linkages and commercialization of Canadian technologies. This strategy will reflect the following priorities that apply to all the department's operations, with varying emphasis on each priority depending on specific market conditions abroad and the functional nature of work at Headquarters and regional offices:
Financial Resources ($ millions) | |||
Year | 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Total Planned Spending | 414.5 | 546.0 | 518.5 |
The department's budget is allocated through Main and Supplementary Estimates approved by Parliament. Given the timing of this year's federal election, funding was provided in an exceptional manner–-through Main Estimates as well as by means of a Governor General Special Warrant (the established instrument for obtaining funds when Parliament is dissolved for the purposes of a general election).
As indicated in the table above, planned spending for International Trade for 2006-2007 will be $414.5 million, a decrease from the amount allocated in the 2005-2006 Main Estimates. This decrease is due to:
The decrease in costs will be offset by increases resulting from:
The department has two voted appropriations (related to operating expenditures and grants and contributions) and four statutory authorities. For 2006-2007, the department's budget will be allocated as follows: roughly 38 percent for operating expenditures and 3 percent for grants and contributions.
Human resources expenditures, excluding $19 million related to employee benefits plans, account for approximately 48 percent of the department's budget. In general, human resources expenditures are funded through voted appropriations. However, employee benefit plans are statutory payments.
A detailed breakdown of the department's planned spending can be found in Part III, section 3.1.4. The financial resources are distributed across the four program activities as follows:
The planned spending figures for the program activities total $414.5 million and include the Expenditure Management Committee cut of $700,000. It should be noted that the government's Expenditure Management Review cuts of five percent in 2005-2006 were applied to all operational budgets, which affected travel and general operations. No specific initiatives or programs were targeted.
The department will contribute more than $10 million in grants and contributions this year, mainly through international business development, promotion of foreign direct investment and S&T cooperation program activities. Key grants and contribution programs include the Program for Export Market Development-Trade Associations, the International Science and Technology Partnerships Program, Going Global and the Community Investment Support Program.
Human Resources (FTEs) | |||
Year | 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Full Time Equivalents | 1,369 | 1,369 | 1,369 |
The department remains committed to building a bilingual, culturally diverse and innovative workforce that fully reflects Canadian society as a whole. At the same time, the department is working to create more productive and innovative relations with employee unions and associations. The department is also working to address the gap in resources in a number of its key occupational groups.
FTEs refers to full-time equivalents, the human resources required to sustain an average level of employment over 12 months, based on a 37.5-hour work week. The above table indicates the approximate number of FTEs the department used last year. The human resources (FTEs) are distributed as follows across the four program activities:
The success of any organization depends entirely on its employees. This is especially true for this department, which requires a unique blend of highly skilled people. The department is continuing to modernize its human resources management. Several significant change initiatives are still under way-some in keeping with government-wide legislative change (e.g. implementation of the Public Service Modernization Act) and others related to the department's transformation agenda and management priorities, including implementation of the Performance Management Program and restructuring of the Foreign Service.
In 2005-2006, the department increased the collection of significant data, and identified and applied more stringent and informative performance indicators. During 2006-2007, the department will develop an integrated performance information system related to resources, internal processes, service delivery and economic data. It expects to implement the system in 2007-2008. In addition, the department monitors and measures performance with the following set of performance indicators (see the table below) for strategic outcomes, priorities and key results taken from the department's business planning framework. This framework provides the basis for strengthening results-based management and for setting objectives related to the Performance Management Program and performance management agreements for the executive cadre. The backbone for this framework will be provided by the data collection and transaction-focused architecture of the VTC-TRIO service pipeline. The TRIO system will also be the source for much of the quantitative data.
The department will continue to undertake a series of targeted audits and evaluations throughout its operations to provide senior management with performance information (see Part IV, section 4.3, table 4.10 for more details).
Specific performance indicators in the following table relate to each of the department's policy and management priorities. These indicators will be used to assess the department's performance in relation to the plans identified in this report, which will be discussed in full in the 2006-2007 Departmental Performance Report.
1. Increasing Canadian awareness of the challenges and opportunities presented by global commerce | |
Planned outcomes: |
As demonstrated by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Strengthening secure access for Canadian business to global markets through the negotiation and implementation of commercial agreements | |
Planned outcomes: |
As demonstrated by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Assisting Canadian business in competing successfully for global opportunities | |
Planned outcomes: |
As demonstrated by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Promoting Canada as a globally competitive location and partner for investment, innovation and value-added production | |
Planned outcomes: |
As demonstrated by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. A department that is recognized as modern and agile | |
Planned outcomes: |
As demonstrated by: |
|
|
|
|
This section provides detailed information about the department's commerce-related strategic outcome, the four program activities and one supporting activity identified in its Program Activity Architecture.
The following four program activities and one supporting activity contribute to this strategic outcome.
Program Activity: analyzing, negotiating, advocating and representing Canada's international trade and economic interests in Canada and abroad, in consultation with stakeholders.
In carrying out this activity, the department:
The program activity effects change both directly and indirectly through:
The direct clients of this program activity are exporters, importers, producers and investors in goods and services industries who benefit from new access opportunities, better and cheaper supplies, and fairer and more predictable operating environments. Its indirect clients are all Canadians who benefit from a greater variety of goods and services and a stronger economy nurtured by an open, rules-based trade and investment regime. Such a regime fosters innovation and employment opportunities through market opening, good regulatory practices and other tools that take into account overriding social, environmental and economic priorities.
Planning Context:
The following factors affect the trade policy and negotiations functions of the department:
The department will contribute mainly to the following key priority under this program activity:
The strategic priority for this program activity is supported by multiple one- to three-year outcomes. The department will advance the achievement of these outcomes by undertaking the following specific actions, listed below.
Strengthening secure access for Canadian business to global markets through the negotiation and implementation of commercial agreements
Financial Resources ($ millions) | |||
Year | 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Total Planned Spending | 51.7 | 60.7 | 45.7 |
Human Resources (FTEs) | |||
Year | 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Full Time Equivalents | 369 | 369 | 369 |
Strengthening secure access for Canadian business to global markets through the negotiation and implementation of commercial agreements | |
Planned outcomes: |
As demonstrated by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Program Activity: integrating Canada's economic, trade, investment and science and technology interests at the regional and bilateral levels and managing commercial relations.
In carrying out this activity, the department delivers core services, including strategic opportunities identification, at missions abroad. This requires ongoing collaboration with partners inside and outside government. Strategies encompassing all aspects of international commerce are being developed for a core group of priority markets, including the United States, Mexico, China, India, Brazil, Russia, Japan, South Korea, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), the Gulf Cooperation Council and the EU. This program activity and the changing nature of global business- increasing regional focus, regional and global supply chains and emphasis on two-way trade and investment-reflect a new outlook for the department's operations abroad.
Planning Context: The following factors affect the world markets functions of the department:
Past successes do not guarantee Canada's future success in the global economy. There is no room for complacency in an ever tougher, more competitive world with more active players and sophisticated and changing business models. The challenges to Canada's competitiveness are steadily increasing. Canada must either get ahead of the curve, with an economy that can quickly adapt to the global challenges and a business sector that "thinks globally" and pursues opportunities worldwide, or it risks a deterioration in its economic prospects, performance and prosperity.
The department will contribute to the following key priorities under this program activity:
Each of the strategic priorities for this program activity is supported by one or more one- to three-year outcomes. The department will advance the achievement of these outcomes by undertaking the following specific actions, listed below by strategic priority.
Increasing Canadian awareness of the challenges and opportunities presented by global commerce
Assisting Canadian business in competing successfully for global opportunities
A department that is recognized as modern and agile
Financial Resources ($ millions) | |||
Year | 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Total Planned Spending | 41.2 | 50.7 | 50.7 |
Human Resources (FTEs) | |||
Year | 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Full Time Equivalents | 512 | 512 | 512 |
Increasing Canadian awareness of the challenges and opportunities presented by global commerce | |
Planned outcomes: |
As demonstrated by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assisting Canadian business in competing successfully for global opportunities | |
Planned outcomes: |
As demonstrated by: |
|
|
A department that is recognized as modern and agile | |
Planned outcomes: |
As demonstrated by: |
|
|
|
Program Activity: managing and delivering international business development services to Canadians.
In carrying out this activity, the department helps position Canadian firms to take full advantage of global business opportunities, thereby contributing directly to prosperity and job creation through the following programs and services:
The department also helps Canadian companies access procurement and investment opportunities financed by international financial institutions such as the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank and by bilateral and multilateral development and relief agencies. In addition, the Market Research Centre provides market information to Canadian business clients across a range of sectors and markets. Roughly 100 market reports and another 100 country sector profiles are produced each year.
Planning Context: The following factors affect the international business development functions of the department:
The department will contribute to the following key priorities under this program activity:
Each of the strategic priorities for this program activity is supported by one or more one- to three-year outcomes. The department will advance the achievement of these outcomes by undertaking the following specific actions, listed below by strategic priority.
Increasing Canadian awareness of the challenges and opportunities presented by global commerce
Assisting Canadian business in competing successfully for global opportunities
A department that is recognized as modern and agile
Financial Resources ($ millions) | |||
Year | 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Total Planned Spending | 309.5 | 418.8 | 405.8 |
Human Resources (FTEs) | |||
Year | 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Full Time Equivalents | 417 | 417 | 417 |
Increasing Canadian awareness of the challenges and opportunities presented by global commerce | |
Planned outcomes: |
As demonstrated by: |
|
|
Assisting Canadian business in competing successfully for global opportunities | |
Planned outcomes: |
As demonstrated by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A department that is recognized as modern and agile | |
Planned outcomes: |
As demonstrated by: |
|
|
|
Program Activity: Attracting and retaining foreign direct investment in Canada, expanding investment abroad and fostering international science and technology collaboration.
In carrying out this activity, the department attracts foreign direct investment in Canada, develops outward investment policy and promotes international science and technology cooperation. This activity contributes to Canada's economic competitiveness and prosperity.
FDI is a key factor in economic growth and productivity performance. Studies have shown that FDI provides much more than financial capital. It stimulates innovation, assists human capital formation, contributes to productivity-enhancing investment in machinery and equipment, strengthens international trade integration, helps create a more competitive business environment, generates positive productivity spillovers for local firms and enhances enterprise development. FDI is important to sustaining and improving Canada's standard of living.
To attract major investors in priority sectors of Canada's economy, the department works closely with economic departments at all levels of government to:
In order to foster international science and technology cooperation, the department maintains a network of dedicated S&T counsellors and trade commissioners based in key markets of opportunity for science, innovation and technology collaboration.
Planning Context: The following factors affect the investment and S&T cooperation functions of the department:
FDI has increased dramatically around the world over the past 20 years, and the competition for global investments is intensifying. Emerging markets are becoming increasingly successful in attracting traditional forms of investments based on low-cost production. Canada, like other industrialized nations, is positioning itself in the higher-value sectors in which it has a clear competitive advantage (e.g. knowledge-based industries, energy and natural resources) as well as in service industries, which require close proximity to clients.
The department will contribute to the following key priorities under this program activity:
Each of the strategic priorities for this program activity is supported by one or more one- to three-year outcomes. The department will advance the achievement of these outcomes by undertaking the following specific actions, listed below by strategic priority.
Strengthening secure access for Canadian business to global markets through the negotiation and implementation of commercial agreements
Assisting Canadian business in competing successfully for global opportunities
Promoting Canada as a globally competitive location and partner for investment, innovation and value-added production
A department that is recognized as modern and agile
Financial Resources ($ millions) | |||
Year | 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Total Planned Spending | 12.2 | 14.1 | 14.1 |
Human Resources (FTEs) | |||
Year | 2006-2007 | 2007-2008 | 2008-2009 |
Full Time Equivalents | 71 | 71 | 71 |
Assisting Canadian business in competing successfully for global opportunities | |
Planned outcomes: |
As demonstrated by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promoting Canada as a globally competitive location and partner for investment, innovation and value-added | |
Planned outcomes: |
As demonstrated by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A department that is recognized as modern and agile | |
Planned outcomes: |
As demonstrated by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supporting Activity: integrating aspects of the department's mandate regarding trade, commerce and investment in order to provide expert advice to the Minister and Deputy Minister on policy development in relation to overall Government of Canada priorities, while incorporating the functions of liaison and consultation with partners inside and outside government.
One of the core functions of the Strategic Policy and Planning supporting activity is to ensure a comprehensive integration of the various program activities across the department.
The Bureau of the Chief Economist, which is contained within this activity, provides the department with the necessary economic research capacity and analytical support for our various program activities. It is also the focal point for all statistical support on trade, commerce and investment.
The department will contribute to the following key priorities under this supporting activity:
Each of the strategic priorities for this program activity is supported by one or more one- to three-year outcomes. The department will advance the achievement of these outcomes by undertaking the following specific actions, listed below by strategic priority.
Increasing Canadian awareness of the challenges and opportunities presented by global commerce
A department that is recognized as modern and agile
This information is integrated within the Program Activities of the International Trade Component of the department.
Increasing Canadian awareness of the challenges and opportunities presented by global commerce | |
Planned outcomes: |
As demonstrated by: |
|
|
A department that is recognized as modern and agile | |
Planned outcomes: |
As demonstrated by: |
|
|
|
List of Tables
4.1 Table: Planned Spending and Full Time Equivalents (FTEs)
4.2 Table: Resources by Program Activity
4.3 Table: Voted and Statutory Items Listed in the Main Estimates
4.4 Table: Services Received Without Charge
4.5 Table: Summary of Capital Spending by Program Activity
4.6 Table: Source of Respendable and Non-Respendable Revenue
4.7 Table: Resource Requirement by Branch or Sector
4.8 Table: Horizontal Initiatives
4.9 Table: Sustainable Development Strategies
4.10 Table: Internal Audits and Evaluations
Table 4.1: Planned Spending, Personnel and Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) for International Trade | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Spending 2005-2006 |
Planned Spending 2006-2007 |
Planned Spending 2007-2008 |
Planned Spending 2008-2009 |
|
Trade Policy and Negotiations | 45.8 | 51.7 | 60.7 | 45.7 |
|
||||
World Markets / Commercial Relations | 0.0 | 41.2 | 50.7 | 50.7 |
|
||||
International Business Development* | 82.1 | 103.6 | 75.9 | 75.9 |
|
||||
Promotion of Foreign Direct Investment and S&T Cooperation | 11.3 | 10.6 | 12.5 | 12.5 |
|
||||
Bilateral Relations | 54.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Budgetary Main Estimates (gross) | 193.4 | 207.0 | 199.8 | 184.8 |
|
||||
International Business Development* | 653.0 | 209.0 | 346.0 | 333.0 |
|
||||
Non-Budgetary Main Estimates (gross) | 653.0 | 209.0 | 346.0 | 333.0 |
|
||||
Less: Respendable Revenue | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 |
Total Main Estimates** |
843.3 | 412.9 | 542.7 | 514.7 |
Adjustments | ||||
|
||||
Financial assistance to softwood lumber industry associations to help offset legal costs incurred in the softwood lumber trade dispute with the U.S. | 18.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
||||
Funding for litigation costs related to the softwood lumber trade dispute with the U.S. | 12.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
||||
Funding to be provided to eligible recipients for research and development costs related to new business technologies (International Science and Technology Partnerships Program) | 0.2 | 2.3 | 3.3 | 3.8 |
|
||||
Initiatives to support the implementation of a common electronic infrastructure and multi-channel service delivery strategy (Government On-Line) | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
||||
Severance and maternity forecast | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
||||
Collective bargaining agreements | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
||||
Expenditure Review Committee - procurement savings | (0.2) | (0.7) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
||||
Expenditure Review Committee | (1.4) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
||||
2005 Federal Budget | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
||||
Total Adjustments | 38.5 | 1.6 | 3.3 | 3.8 |
Total Planned Spending*** |
881.8 | 414.5 | 546.0 | 518.5 |
|
||||
Less: Non-Respendable revenue | 18.2 | 16.8 | 16.7 | 16.7 |
|
||||
Plus: Cost of services received without charge | 14.0 | 15.1 | 15.3 | 15.1 |
Net Cost of Department |
877.6 | 412.8 | 544.6 | 516.9 |
Personnel - Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) |
1,316 | 1,369 | 1,369 | 1,369 |
*Note:International Business Development includes budgetary and non-budgetary statutory payments to Export Development Canada
(EDC) in the amount of 2005-2006 $18.9M, 2006-2007 $18.3M, 2007-2008 $17.5M and 2008-2009 $17.5M budgetary. And 2005-2006 $653M, 2006-2007 $209M, 2007-2008 $346M,
and 2008-2009 $333M. These amounts are for Canada account coverage and not available for any operational use by the department. **Note: The allocation of the corporate services to the program activities will differ from the Main Estimates since the method of allocation has been revised. For the Main Estimates, the budgetary and non-budgetary portion of EDC was included in the calculation of the percentages by program activity. The methodology has been changed to exclude EDC since DFAIT does not provide services to EDC. ***Note: Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown. |
||||
Table 4.2: Resources by Program Activity | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006-2007 | |||||||||||
Budgetary | Non- Budgetary |
Total Main Estimates |
Adjustments (planned spending not in Main Estimates)- |
Total Planned Spending |
|||||||
Program Activity | Operating | Capital | Grants | Contributions and Other Transfer Payments |
Gross | Respend- able Revenue |
Net | Loans, Investments and Advances |
|||
Trade Policy and Negotiations | 51.1 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 51.7 | 0.0 | 51.7 | 0.0 | 51.7 | 0.0 | 51.7 |
|
|||||||||||
World Markets / Commercial Relations | 41.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 41.1 | 0.0 | 41.1 | 0.0 | 41.1 | 0.0 | 41.1 |
|
|||||||||||
International Business Development | 96.5 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 4.3 | 103.6 | 3.1 | 100.5 | 209.0 | 309.5 | 0.0 | 309.5 |
|
|||||||||||
Promotion of Foreign Direct Investment and S&T Cooperation | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.5 | 10.5 | 0.0 | 10.5 | 0.0 | 10.5 | 1.6 | 12.2 |
Total |
194.7 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 8.8 | 206.9 | 3.1 | 203.8 | 209.0 | 412.8 | 1.6 | 414.5 |
Note: Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown. Note: The $309.5M includes EDC amounts of $18.3M budgetary and $209.0M non-budgetary. |
|||||||||||
Table 4.3: Voted and Statutory Items Listed in the Main Estimates ($ millions) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Vote or Statutory Item |
Truncated Vote or Statutory Wording |
2006-2007 Main Estimates |
2005-2006 Main Estimates |
15 | Operating expenditures | 156.0 | 141.4 |
20 | Grants and contributions | 10.9 | 10.9 |
(S) | Minister of International Trade salary and motor car allowance | 0.1 | 0.1 |
(S) | Contributions to employee benefit plans | 18.6 | 18.9 |
(S) | Payments to Export Development Canada for the purpose of facilitating and developing trade between Canada and other countries under the terms of the Export Development Act (Budgetary) | 18.3 | 18.9 |
(S) | Payments to Export Development Canada for the purpose of facilitating and developing trade between Canada and other countries under the terms of the Export Development Act (Non-Budgetary) | 209.0 | 653.0 |
Total Department |
412.9 | 843.2 | |
Note: Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown. | |||
Table 4.4: Services Received Without Charge ($ millions) | |
---|---|
2006-2007 | Total |
Accommodation provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) | 7.1 |
|
|
Contributions covering the employer's share of employees' insurance premiums and expenditures paid by the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) (excluding revolving funds) | 7.3 |
|
|
Workers' compensation coverage provided by Human Resources and Skills Development Canada (HRSDC) | 0.1 |
|
|
Salary and associated expenditures of legal services provided by the Department of Justice Canada (JUS) | 0.6 |
|
|
Other | |
Total 2006–2007 Services Received Without Charge |
15.1 |
Note: Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown. | |
Table 4.5: Summary of Capital Spending by Program Activity ($ millions) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity | Forecast Spending 2005-2006 |
Planned Spending 2006-2007 |
Planned Spending 2007-2008 |
Planned Spending 2008-2009 |
Trade Policy and Negotiations | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
|
||||
World Markets / Commercial Relations | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
||||
International Business Development | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
|
||||
Promotion of Foreign Direct Investment and S&T Cooperation | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Total |
1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown. Explanatory notes: Planned spending is spending that a department may commit to in the future but has not necessarily committed to now, and for which it has some form of approval (Cabinet, TB submission). Typically, these amounts are found in the "adjustments" row in the Estimates and out-year columns of the RPP Planned Spending table. Forecast spending is spending that the department is committed to, or intends to pursue. Typically, the inclusion of Supplementary Estimates amounts in the forecast column in the RPP for the current fiscal year falls into this category. Clearly the two overlap, since forecast spending constitutes part of planned spending. The difference between the two is the degree of certainty. |
||||
Table 4.6: Source of Respendable and Non-Respendable Revenue ($ millions) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Respendable Revenue | Forecast Revenue 2005-2006 |
Planned Revenue 2006-2007 |
Planned Revenue 2007-2008 |
Planned Revenue 2008-2009 |
International Business Development | ||||
|
||||
Trade fairs and trade / investment technology missions | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 |
Non-Respendable Revenue | Forecast Revenue 2005-2006 |
Planned Revenue 2006-2007 |
Planned Revenue 2007-2008 |
Planned Revenue 2008-2009 |
Trade Policy and Negotiations | ||||
|
||||
Import and export permit fees | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 |
|
||||
International Business Development | ||||
|
||||
Contributions repaid under the Program for Export Market Development | 3.4 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
|
||||
Strategic Policy, Communications and Corporate Planning | ||||
|
||||
Employee rent shares | 5.8 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 5.8 |
|
||||
Adjustment to previous years' expenditures | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
|
||||
6.8 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 6.8 | |
Total Non-Respendable Revenue | 18.2 | 16.8 | 16.7 | 16.7 |
Total Respendable and Non-Respendable Revenue |
21.3 | 19.9 | 19.8 | 19.8 |
Note: Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown. | ||||
Table 4.7: Resource Requirement by Branch ($ millions) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Activity | |||||
Branch | Trade Policy and Negotiations |
World Markets / Commercial Relations |
International Business Development |
Promotion of Foreign Direct Investment and S&T Technology |
Total Planned Spending |
Minister's and Deputy Minister's Offices | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 3.8 |
|
|||||
Trade Policy and Negotiations | 48.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 48.6 |
|
|||||
World Markets | 0.0 | 37.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 37.9 |
|
|||||
Business Development and Chief Trade Commissioner | 0.0 | 0.0 | 46.4 | 0.0 | 46.4 |
|
|||||
Investment, Science and Technology | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 11.5 | 11.5 |
|
|||||
Communications, Strategic Policy and Business Planning | 2.1 | 2.5 | 34.0 | 0.5 | 39.1 |
|
|||||
Export Development Canada | 0.0 | 0.0 | 227.3 | 0.0 | 227.3 |
Total | 51.7 | 41.2 | 309.5 | 12.2 | 414.5 |
Table 4.8: Horizontal Initiative |
---|
Name of Horizontal Initiative: Team Canada Inc (TCI) |
Name of Lead Departments: DFAIT, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Canadian Heritage, Industry Canada and Natural Resources Canada (executive members) plus other federal departments and agencies. |
Start Date:1997 |
End Date: Ongoing |
Total Federal Funding Allocation: The initiative had an annual budget of $1.3 million. Federal partner members of TCI contribute $50,000 each per year, with the aforementioned executive members contributing $150,000 each. Other partners contribute a range of products and services that address the various needs of Canadian exporters. |
Description of the Initiative: TTeam Canada Inc is a network of federal departments and agencies working with the provinces and territories and other partners to help Canadian businesses succeed in world markets. TCI's purpose is to provide the Canadian business community with single-window access to fully integrated Government of Canada services with a view to enhancing exporter capability and preparedness in international market development. Government of Canada priorities that are addressed by TCI include:
|
Shared Outcome(s): According to the Common Performance Measurement Framework developed by TCI, common or shared outcomes (immediate and intermediate) are as follows: Immediate Outcomes:
Expenditures totalling $1.3 million in 2006-2007 will support the above shared outcomes. Due to the nature of the outcomes (i.e. diverse activities by multiple partners collectively contribute to a given outcome), it is impossible to allocate specific funding amounts to each. The annual report of Team Canada Inc for the year ending March 31, 2005, can be ordered by calling 1 888 811-1119. |
Governance structure(s): A Management Board (currently chaired by International Trade) is responsible for planning, directing, managing and implementing this horizontal program. Day-to-day operations of TCI are managed by the TCI Directorate (consisting of five full-time staff), which is accountable to the host department (currently DFAIT) management structure. The TCI Directorate is responsible for directing and managing TCI Directorate human and financial resources, and implementing TCI's annual action plan. The Management Board consists of a Director General level official (or equivalent) from each TCI federal member organization. There is also an Executive Committee, which consists of the five DG-level Management Board representatives from the five core members of TCI (i.e. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Canadian Heritage, DFAIT, Industry Canada, and Natural Resources Canada). Each TCI partner provides specific products and services depending upon its mandate, which could focus on a particular function (e.g. export insurance), industry sector (e.g. natural resources) or geographic area (e.g. Alberta). |
Federal Partners Involved | Name of Program | Total Allocation |
Planned Spending 2006-2007 |
Expected Results for 2006-2007 |
All 16 of TCI's members contribute to all programs, and contributions are pooled. | Online Export Portal | $450,000 | $450,000 | See outcomes listed above; all of these activities contribute to the achievement of these outcomes. |
|
||||
1-888 Export Information Service | $350,000 | $350,000 | ||
|
||||
Information products | $230,000 | $230,000 | ||
|
||||
Regional trade networks | $270,000 | $270,000 | ||
Total | $1,300,000 | $1,300,000 | ||
Note: Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown. Contact Information: Michael Calvert, Director, Team Canada Inc Tel.: (613) 952-7396 Email: calvert.michael@exportsource.ca |
||||
Table 4.9: Sustainable Development Strategy
1. How does your department / agency plan to incorporate SD principles and values into your mission, vision, policy and day-to-day operations?
|
|
2. What goals, objectives and targets from your most recent SDS will you be focusing on this coming year? How will you measure your
success? International Trade specific goals, objectives and targets from Agenda 2006 that will be the focus of the remaining months of 2006 are listed below. Goal 1: Ensure greater integration of sustainable development in departmental policies, programs and operations. Objective 2: Greater policy integration and increased support for SD across DFAIT. Target: Name an SD champion at the Assistant Deputy Minister or Deputy Minister level, and an SD advocate for each bureau. Objective 3: Improved internal communications on SD. Target: Develop communication products promoting Canadian sector SD capabilities to foreign buyers. Goal 2: Ensure better integration of sustainable development considerations in our multilateral, regional and bilateral relations. Objective 2: Improved integration of environmental considerations in trade promotion and financing. Target: Support the development and marketing of innovative pollution-reducing technologies. Goal 4: Implement the two departments' priority commitments related to the World Summit on Sustainable Development: Johannesburg 2002. Objective 4: In accordance with the Doha Declaration, capacity building and structural reform within the World Trade Organization (WTO) for developing countries to reap the long-term benefits that ambitious trade liberalization can generate. Target: Continue efforts to find appropriate solutions as a priority to outstanding implementation-related issues regarding the mandates Ministers gave in paragraph 12 of the WTO Doha Ministerial Declaration and the Doha Decision on Implementation-Related Issues and Concerns. This specifically includes issues where ministers provide a specific negotiating mandate (as cited in paragraph 12 (a) of the Doha Ministerial Declaration). In addition, these efforts will also include all outstanding implementation issues under paragraph 12(b) of the Declaration, including on issues related to the extension of the protection of geographical indications provided for in Article 23 of the TRIPS Agreement to products other than wines and spirits and those related to the relationship between the TRIPS Agreement and the Convention on Biological Diversity. Success in meeting SDS commitments is measured in the following ways. Annual progress in achieving the targets in Agenda 2006 is summarized in the 2004-2005 and 2005-2006 Departmental Performance Reports. For more substantive annual reporting, see Progress Reports 2004-2005 and 2005-2006 on the departmental website at http://www.dfaitmaeci. gc.ca/sustain/SustainDev/overview-en.asp. These reports are submitted to the Commissioner for the Environment and Sustainable Development (CESD). Analysis of the progress in relation to the outcomes is currently underway. Finally, in preparation for the next SDS, International Trade has established an SDS Steering Committee to discuss ways in which divisions can monitor and
measure SDS commitment outcomes. |
3. Identify any Sustainable Development tools, such as Strategic Environmental Assessments or Environmental Management Systems, that will be
applied over the next year. International Trade anticipates applying the following SD tools over the next year: Voluntary Approaches: Promotion of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) voluntary codes of conduct to Canadian stakeholders. Information and Awareness: National Contact Point for the implementation of the OECD Guidelines on Corporate Social Responsibility for Multinational Enterprises involving promotional activities with stakeholders and the public. Command and Control: Strategic Environmental Assessments of policy, plan and program proposals in line with the Cabinet Directive, including trade and investment agreements and Memoranda to Cabinet. |
Table 4.10: Internal Audits and Evaluations | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
International Trade Audit Plans for 2005-2007 - Modified for input into the 2006-2007 Report on Plans and Priorities | ||||
Financial Audits1 | ||||
Project | Description / Objective | 2005-2006 | 2006-2007 | Time Frame |
Audit of Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities Assurance Engagement |
To determine the extent to which Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities are being accounted for in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and that internal controls are in place and working effectively. | X | 4th Quarter | |
|
||||
Audit of Financial Functions at Missions Abroad and HQ Assurance Engagement |
To determine the extent to which the department has sufficient financial expertise at missions and HQ. The audit will include an examination of the position qualifications, recruiting methods and training program. | X | 2nd Quarter | |
|
||||
Audit of Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities Assurance Engagement |
To determine the extent to which Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities are being accounted for in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and that internal controls are in place and working effectively. | X | 4th Quarter | |
|
||||
Audit of Financial Functions at Missions Abroad and HQ Assurance Engagement |
To determine the extent to which the department has sufficient financial expertise at missions and HQ. The audit will include an examination of the position qualifications, recruiting methods and training program. | X | 2nd Quarter | |
|
||||
Audit of Foreign Operations and International Banking Assurance Engagement |
To determine the extent to which the Foreign Operations and International Banking Division:
|
X | 3rd – 4th Quarter | |
|
||||
Audit of Recoverable / Payables Assurance Engagement |
To determine the extent to which the handling of other government department (OGD) transactions at missions is accurate and consistent, as well as how these amounts are recovered/paid through HQ from/to our partner departments. | X | 1st Quarter | |
|
||||
Follow-up of Assurance Audits Assurance Engagement |
To determine the extent to which recommendations resulting from six financial audits performed over the past several years have been implemented. The six
audits were:
|
X | 3rd Quarter | |
|
||||
1Once International Trade's financial management accountabilities have been defined, their inclusion in the scope of the above audits will be determined. Results and recommendations will be communicated to the department. | ||||
|
||||
Information Management Audit | ||||
Project | Description / Objective | 2005-2006 | 2006-2007 | Time Frame |
Audit of Network "Content" SecurityAssurance Engagement |
The broad objective of this audit is to provide assurance of the integrity of the information on the internal computer networks. More specifically, the audit
will:
|
X | 3rd – 4th Quarter | |
Grants and Contributions Program Audits | ||||
Project | Description / Objective | 2005-2006 | 2006-2007 | Time Frame |
Technical Assistance to Developing Countries in Trade Negotiations | To provide assurance on the proper management and administration of departmental grants and contributions. Assurance engagement. |
X | 3rd – 4th Quarter | |
|
||||
Assistance to Softwood Lumber Industry Association | X | TBD | ||
Recipient Audits | ||||
Project | Description / Objective | 2005-2006 | 2006-2007 | Time Frame |
Community Investment Services Program | X | 1st – 4th Quarter | ||
|
||||
X | 1st – 4th Quarter | |||
|
||||
Forest Products Association of Canada | X | 3rd Quarter | ||
|
||||
Going Global - Science and Technology | To determine the extent of recipient's compliance with the terms and conditions of the agreement and ensure that financial reports appropriately account for the use of funds while demonstrating that funds were used for the intended purpose and that value has been received. | X | 1st – 4th Quarter | |
Assurance engagements. | X | 1st – 4th Quarter | ||
Mission Inspections | ||||
Project | Description / Objective | 2005-2006 | 2006-2007 | Time Frame |
Mission Inspections Consulting Engagements | To provide management with an assessment of mission operations and management controls. These engagements provide advice to missions, examine compliance with
policies and regulations, and examine methods to enhance performance. Over the course of several mission inspections, work will be conducted that targets, on a risk basis, particular horizontal processes, subjects, issues and questions. The results of the inspections will be accumulated and analyzed to enable the development of statements of assurance on the selected horizontal topics. |
Preparation fieldwork reporting | ||
|
||||
Inspection Tours | Accra, Athens, Barcelona, London, Madrid | X | 1st -2nd Quarter | |
|
||||
Bandar Seri Begawan, Bangkok, Jakarta, Abu Dhabi, Dubai | X | 3rd Quarter | ||
|
||||
Riga, Tallinn, Vilnius | X | 4th Quarter | ||
|
||||
Bucharest, Tel Aviv, Ramallah, Tunisia, Tripoli | X | 4th Quarter | ||
|
||||
Seoul, Taipei, Colombo | X | 4th Quarter | ||
|
||||
Kuwait, Riyadh, Kuala Lumpur | X | 1st Quarter | ||
|
||||
Washington, Wash-OAS, Philadelphia | X | 1st Quarter | ||
|
||||
Moscow, St. Petersburg, Almaty | X | 2nd Quarter | ||
|
||||
Brasilia, São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Belo Horizonte, Buffalo | X | 3rd Quarter | ||
|
||||
Dakar, Yaoundé, Geneva | X | 3rd Quarter | ||
|
||||
Helsinki, Warsaw, Prague, Bratislava | X | 4th Quarter | ||
|
||||
Havana, Port of Spain, Bogotá | X | 4th Quarter | ||
|
International Trade Evaluations Planned for 2006-2007 | |||||
Name of Evaluation | Description | 2005-2006 | 2006-2007 | Start Date | End Date |
Canadian Foreign Service Institute (CFSI) | This analysis provides an in-depth review of the CFSI after 15 years of operation: its relevance, cost-effectiveness and results achieved. Recommendations will aim to guide management in revitalizing the mandate of the Institute to meet the challenges of a new international environment. |
X | August 2005 |
May 2006 |
|
|
|||||
Country Studies | Development and validation of a methodology for country studies. In support of the "whole of government" approach, the country studies will be comprehensive reviews of our involvement with the selected countries from both a Headquarters and a field perspective. They will aim to show how our various programs contribute to reaching our goals. | X | May 2006 |
January 2007 |
|
The Evaluation Division will pilot test the methodology and tools developed by completing a country study in a country where the planning process has been in place. | X | January 2007 |
July 2007 |
||
|
|||||
Dispute Management | The evaluation will examine the relevance and effectiveness of the Canada-U.S. Agreement, as well as lessons learned. Theme selected: wheat. | X | May 2006 |
October 2006 |
|
|
|||||
Enhanced Representation Initiative (ERI)-USA | This evaluation will look at the design and quality of the implementation and assess the effectiveness of the ERI as a horizontal initiative. | X | July 2005 |
May 2006 |
|
|
|||||
Hub and Spoke | This review will assess the effectiveness of the existing delivery models in different regions and identify the factors that facilitate and impede the success of the Hub and Spoke approach (i.e. relations between main and satellite offices). | X | September 2006 |
March 2007 |
|
|
|||||
IBD Germany | Evaluation of the International Business Development (IBD) trade program in Germany to assess the relevance of the delivery mechanisms and alignment of resources with International Trade and partners' priorities. | X | March 2006 |
September 2006 |
|
|
|||||
Knowledge Management | As a follow-up to the IM/IT (Information Management, Information Technology) Needs Analysis Study, this study will examine how the department acquires, organizes, stores and disseminates knowledge in order to provide recommendations on how to improve knowledge management. | X | April 2006 |
December 2006 |
|
|
|||||
Trade and Development | This policy review will examine the relevance of the policy. | X | January 2006 |
May 2007 |
|
|
|||||
Trade Regional Offices | Evaluation of the relevance of the trade regional offices and the value added that the network brings to business development activities at large. | X | September 2006 |
February 2007 |
|
|
The department offers a wealth of information, resources and reference tools. To learn more about Canadian foreign policy and international relations or about the department itself, use any of the following contacts:
Telephone: | 1-800-267-8376 toll free in Canada or 1-613-944-4000 in the National Capital Region and outside Canada |
TTY: | 1-613-944-9136 |
Fax: | 1-613-996-9709 |
E-mail: | enqserv@international.gc.ca |
Mail: | Enquiries Services (SXCI) Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade 125 Sussex Drive, Ottawa, ON K1A 0G2 |
Web: | http://www.international.gc.ca |
Media Services: | 1-613-995-1874 or fax 1-613-995-1405 |
Canadian Commercial Corporation | |
Mail: | 1100 50 O'Connor Street, Ottawa, ON K1A 0S6 |
Tel.: | 1 800-748-8191 toll free in Canada or 1-613-996-0034 in the National Capital Region and outside Canada |
Fax: | 1-613-995 2121 |
Web: | http://www.ccc.ca |
Canadian International Development Agency | |
Mail: | 200 Promenade du Portage Gatineau, QC K1A 0G4 |
Tel.: | 1-800-230-6349 toll free in Canada or 1-819-997-5006 in the National Capital Region and outside Canada |
Fax: | 1-819-953-6088 |
Web: | http://www.acdi-cida.gc.ca |
Export Development Canada | |
Mail: | 151 O'Connor Street, Ottawa, ON K1A 1K3 |
Tel.: | 1-613-598 2500 |
Fax: | 1-613-237 2690 |
TTY: | 1-866-574-0451 |
Web: | http://www.edc.ca |
International Development Research Centre | |
Mail: | 250 Albert Street, 18th Floor P.O. Box 8500 Ottawa, ON K1G 3H9 |
Tel.: | 1-613-236-6163 |
Fax: | 1-613-238-7230 |
Web: | http://www.idrc.ca |
International Joint Commission | |
Mail: | Canadian Sector 234 Laurier Avenue West, 22nd Floor Ottawa, ON K1P 6K6 |
Tel.: | 1-613-995-0088 |
Fax: | 1-613-993-5583 |
Web: | http://www.ijc.org |
North American Free Trade Agreement | |
Mail: | (NAFTA)-Canadian Section, 90 Sparks Street, Suite 705, Ottawa, ON K1P 5B4 |
Tel.: | 1-613-992-9388 |
Fax: | 1-613-992-9392 |
Web: | http://www.nafta-sec-alena.org |
Passport Canada | |
Mail: | DFAIT, Gatineau, QC K1A 0G3 |
Tel.: | 1-800-567-6868 toll free in Canada or 1-819-994-3500 in the National Capital Region and outside Canada |
TTY: | 1-819-994-3560 or 1-866-255-7655 |
Web: | http://www.ppt.gc.ca |
Rights & Democracy: International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development |
|
Mail: | 1001 de Maisonneuve Blvd. East Suite 1100 Montreal, QC H2L 4P9 |
Tel.: | 1-514-283-6073 |
Fax: | 1-514-283-3792 |
Web: | http://www.ichrdd.ca |
ADM | Assistant Deputy Minister |
APEC | Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum |
ARF | APEC Regional Forum |
ASEAN | Association of Southeast Asian Nations |
BRIC | Brazil Russia India China |
BSE | Bovine spongiform encephalopathy |
CARICOM | Caribbean Community |
CIDA | Canadian International Development Agency |
CTCBF | Counter-Terrorism Capacity-Building Fund |
DFAIT | Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade |
DG | Director General |
ERI | Enhanced Representation Initiativel |
EU | European Union |
FIPA | Foreign Investment Protection and Promotion Agreement |
FTA | Free Trade Agreement |
FTE | Full Time Equivalent |
G8 | Group of seven leading industrialized nations (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom, United States) plus Russia |
GATS | General Agreement on Trade in Services |
HIV/AIDS | Human immunodeficiency virus / acquired immunodeficiency syndrome |
HOM | Head of Mission |
HR | Human Resources |
HRSDC | Human Resources and Skills Development Canada |
ICAO | International Civil Aviation Organization |
IM/IT | Information management / information technology |
LES | Locally engaged staff |
MAF | Management Accountability Framework |
MOU | Memorandum of understanding |
MRRS | Management, Resources and Results Structure |
NAFTA | North American Free Trade Agreement |
NATO | North Atlantic Treaty Organization |
NEPAD | New Partnership for Africa's Development |
NORAD | North American Aerospace Defence Command |
OAS | Organization of American States |
OECD | Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development |
OGD | Other government department |
PAA | Program Activity Architecture |
PCO | Privy Council Office |
R2P | Responsibility to Protect |
R&D | Research and development |
RBAF | Risk-Based Audit Framework |
RCMP | Royal Canadian Mounted Police |
RMAF | Results-based Management Accountability Framework |
S&T | Science and technology |
SMEs | Small and medium-sized enterprises |
TBS | Treasury Board Secretariat |
TCI | Team Canada Inc |
TCS | Trade Commissioner Service |
UN | United Nations |
UNESCO | United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization |
WTO | World Trade Organization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ankara, Turkey Chancery construction |
EPA |
12.4 |
12.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Berlin, Germany Chancery construction |
EPA |
101.2 |
100.8 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Dhaka, Bangladesh Construction of diplomatic complex |
PPA |
24.3 |
18.4 |
4.9 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Moscow, Russia Fit-up of new chancery and residential accommodation |
LPA |
40.0 |
0.9 |
4.1 |
30.0 |
5.0 |
0.0 |
Rome, Italy Chancery acquisition and fit-up |
EPA |
46.1 |
37.3 |
3.9 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Seoul, Korea Construction of chancery and 7 staff quarters |
EPA |
69.0 |
32.8 |
12.1 |
7.0 |
5.1 |
0.0 |
InfoBank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information Management Project |
EPA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Project Spending |
|
293.0 |
202.6 |
25.1 |
37.0 |
10.1 |
0.0 |
Due to rounding, figures may not add to totals shown.
Notes:
EPA denotes Effective Project Approval and indicates that the project is being implemented.
LPA denotes Lease Project Approval by Treasury Board. Only the fit-up portion of the project is being capitalized. Project is under way.
PPA denotes Preliminary Project Approval by Treasury Board. Project is under way.
Ankara, Turkey - Chancery construction: project completed in December 2004.
Berlin, Germany - Chancery construction: project completed in April 2005.
Dhaka, Bangladesh - Construction of diplomatic complex: construction of a new chancery and official residence driven by health and safety issues and terminating leases in the existing premises; completion scheduled for September 2006.
Moscow, Russia - Fit-up of new chancery and residential accommodation: relocation of the chancery is driven by health and safety, security matters and lack of space; completion scheduled for summer 2008.
Rome, Italy - Chancery purchase/renovation: project prompted by structural problems in the existing building; completion scheduled for March 2006.
Seoul, Korea - Construction of chancery and 7 staff quarters: prompted by space shortage in the existing premises; completion scheduled for July 2007.
Other Projects:
The Hague, Netherlands - Construction of chancery addition: prompted by space shortage in the existing chancery; completion scheduled for September 2007.
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia - Construction of official residence and 6 staff quarters: prompted by health and safety issues and need to maximize the development potential of an existing property; completion scheduled for August 2008.
Other Chancery Projects in the Planning or Design Stage:
Abuja, Amman, Beijing addition, Brasilia addition, Georgetown, Havana, Islamabad addition, Lima, Madrid, New Delhi addition, Rabat, Riyadh addition, and the renovation of the Paris chancery.
Relocations of leased chanceries to more appropriate accommodation are scheduled for 2006 in Milan, Guadalajara and Monterrey; for the subsequent two years in Dubai, Dublin, Moscow, Mumbai, Quito, Rio de Janeiro, San Francisco, Seattle, Singapore and Tunis. Expansions are scheduled for 2006 in Guangzhou, Kabul, Ramallah, São Paulo and Shanghai. Relocation of official residences is planned for Algiers, Beirut and Prague. Opening of a new mission is planned for Baghdad in 2006.
Other Initiatives:
Program Activity: International Security
1 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Initiatives related to the destruction, disposition and securing of weapons of mass destruction (TB #830799, TB #831536, TB #131449, TB #832273) |
||||||||
Start Date: August 12, 2003 |
End Date: March 2013 |
||||||||
Description: To implement Canada's commitment to the G8 Global Partnership Against the Spread of WMD through the destruction of chemical weapons, the dismantlement of nuclear submarines, the employment of former weapons scientists and the enhancement of nuclear and radiological security. Canada has committed up to $1 billion over 10 years beginning in 2003 to implement the goals of the Global Partnership. The justification for the Partnership was based on an ongoing assessment of threats to Canadian security following the terrorist attacks of September 2001. Exhaustive evaluations at the G8 level led to the conclusion by leaders at the Kananaskis Summit that the seriousness of the threats could only be addressed if a cooperative approach, supported by significant resources, was adopted. |
|||||||||
Objectives: The objective of the Global Partnership Program approved by Cabinet in 2002 is to protect Canadians from security threats emanating from terrorism, failed/failing nation-states, the risks posed by the proliferation of WMD and health pandemics. This is being accomplished through:
|
|||||||||
Strategic Outcome: ADVANCING CANADA'S INTERESTS INTERNATIONALLY: In partnership with Canadians, Canada and its values are projected to the world, its interests are pursued abroad and Canadians are better able to interpret the world. |
|||||||||
Expected Results: A reduced threat from WMD for Canadians, strengthening of the international non-proliferation, arms control and disarmament regime, and securing of Canada's domestic and international security objectives. Canada's interests and security are protected and pursued, in partnership with Canadians and other countries, to advance Canadian interests, enhance domestic and international peace and security, and project Canadian values. |
|||||||||
Program Activity: |
Forecast |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|||||
International Security |
107,845,000 |
85,914,000 |
84,662,000 |
138,000 |
|||||
Total Contributions |
107,845,000 |
85,914,000 |
84,662,000 |
138,000 |
|||||
Planned Audits and Evaluations: Formative evaluation to be completed by March 31, 2006. Internal audit planned in fiscal year 2006-2007. Recipient audit planned for nuclear submarine program; audit liaison visits planned to recipient organizations (International Science and Technology Center, IAEA, U.K. Ministry of Defence, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development). |
|||||||||
2 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) TB#812890 |
||||||||
Start Date: December 19, 1989 |
End Date: N/A |
||||||||
Description: Canada's assessed contribution for 2005 for the IAEA is a legally binding obligation of membership. The IAEA is the world centre for nuclear cooperation and it works for the safe, secure and peaceful use of nuclear technology. Canada has significant interests at the IAEA based on our belief in the importance of the Agency's role in advancing the goals of nuclear non-proliferation, safety and security, our advanced and extensive nuclear and isotope production industry, and our important uranium sector. |
|||||||||
Strategic Outcome: ADVANCING CANADA'S INTERESTS INTERNATIONALLY: In partnership with Canadians, Canada and its values are projected to the world, its interests are pursued abroad and Canadians are better able to interpret the world. |
|||||||||
Expected Results: The projection of Canadian values abroad, the preservation of Canadian national security, the strengthening of international stability and security, the promotion of world economic growth and prosperity, and support for multilateral institutions and mechanisms. (a) Effective and efficient implementation of the IAEA's major programs as reflected in the Agency's biannual program and budget (b) increased profile for Canada in the Agency's activities (c) direct and indirect technical and commercial dividends to the Canadian nuclear industry, and (d) IAEA actions and decisions consistent with Canadian foreign policy priorities. |
|||||||||
Program Activity: |
Forecast |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|||||
International Security |
10,242,000 |
10,950,000 |
10,950,000 |
10,950,000 |
|||||
Total Contributions |
10,242,000 |
10,950,000 |
10,950,000 |
10,950,000 |
|||||
Planned Audits and Evaluations: unavailable |
3 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) - Civil Administration (TB #807627) |
||||
Start Date: January 1, 1989 |
End Date: N/A |
||||
Description: Canada's annual assessed contribution to NATO is a legally binding obligation of membership based on the 1949 Washington and North Atlantic Treaties. Canada's contribution furthers its foreign policy goals by funding the administrative budget of NATO, an international organization vital to Canadian defence and security interests. NATO was designed to promote the stability of the North Atlantic area and to safeguard the freedom and security of its people by political and military means, based on the principles of democracy, individual liberty and international law. The NATO civil budget, structured along "output based" lines in response to objectives set annually by the North Atlantic Council, covers the activities of the NATO Secretary General, the NATO headquarters and the NATO international staff. The NATO civil administration supports the process of consensus building and decision making among alliance members and manages NATO's relations with its partners. The NATO civil budget also supports the work of various NATO agencies with specialized responsibilities. An effective and efficient NATO civil administration assists alliance members in promoting security and stability in the North Atlantic area and in responding effectively to current security challenges. The NATO accounts are subject to annual audit by the International Board of Auditors for NATO. |
|||||
Strategic Outcome: ADVANCING CANADA'S INTERESTS INTERNATIONALLY: In partnership with Canadians, Canada and its values are projected to the world, its interests are pursued abroad and Canadians are better able to interpret the world. |
|||||
Expected Results: The NATO civil budget enables the operations of the NATO Secretariat and agencies. The results expected include effective decision making by the alliance in pursuit of NATO objectives of stability and security in the North Atlantic region and beyond, support to NATO operations, timely implementation of decisions taken by the North Atlantic Council, appropriate response to current and emerging defence and security challenges, enhanced relations with NATO partners and cooperation with other international organizations, and proper management of the alliance's resources. |
|||||
Program Activity: |
Forecast |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
International Security |
20,348,000 |
17,222,000 |
17,222,000 |
17,222,000 |
|
Total Contributions |
20,348,000 |
17,222,000 |
17,222,000 |
17,222,000 |
|
Planned Audits and Evaluations: The NATO accounts are subject to annual audit by the International Board of Auditors for NATO. |
4 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) (TB #820933) |
||||
Start Date: January 1, 1993 |
End Date: N/A |
||||
Description: Canada's annual assessed contribution to the OSCE is an obligation arising out of Canada's commitments as one of the 55 participating states of the organization. Canada's contribution furthers its foreign policy goals by funding programs implemented by the OSCE's institutions and field operations in priority foreign policy areas for Canada related to regional and international security. The OSCE is a focused regional forum with a comprehensive and cooperative approach to security. Canada's contribution to the organization's unified budget covers the costs associated with the implementation of the organization's work programs and activities in three dimensions: political and military aspects of security; economic and environmental cooperation; and cooperation in humanitarian and other fields. This integrated approach allows the OSCE to make a significant contribution to furthering European security and transatlantic cooperation through non-coercive measures. Canada's contribution also supports stronger partnership with Canadians in developing and implementing Canada's international security policy, through the involvement of members of Parliament in the work of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, the deployment of Canadians to OSCE field operations, and the contribution of Canadian experts to the organization. The OSCE unified budget, based on a programmatic approach, is approved by the OSCE Permanent Council on a yearly basis. The OSCE accounts are subject to an annual report by external auditors as well as an internal oversight annual report that are made available to participating states. |
|||||
Strategic Outcome: ADVANCING CANADA'S INTERESTS INTERNATIONALLY: In partnership with Canadians, Canada and its values are projected to the world, its interests are pursued abroad and Canadians are better able to interpret the world. |
|||||
Expected Results: The OSCE budget supports the programs of the OSCE Secretariat in Vienna, as well as the OSCE institutions (Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, Representative on Freedom of the Media and High Commissioner on National Minorities) and the organization's 18 field missions. The results expected include effective and timely implementation of the decisions of the OSCE Permanent Council, continuous monitoring of the security and stability situation in Europe, concerted programming to actively contribute to conflict prevention, conflict resolution and post-conflict institution building, and proper management of the organization's resources. |
|||||
Program Activity: |
Forecast |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
International Security |
17,638,000 |
16,211,000 |
16,211,000 |
16,211,000 |
|
Total Contributions |
17,638,000 |
16,211,000 |
16,211,000 |
16,211,000 |
|
Planned Audits and Evaluations: The OSCE accounts are subject to an annual report by external auditors as well as an internal oversight annual report that are made available to participating states. |
|||||
Total Program Activity: International Security |
156,073,000 |
130,297,000 |
129,045,000 |
44,521,000 |
|
Total Transfer Payments |
156,073,000 |
130,297,000 |
129,045,000 |
44,521,000 |
Program Activity: Global Issues
1 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: International Organisation of the Francophonie (OIF) (TB #709620) |
||||
Start Date: March 9, 1972 |
End Date: N/A |
||||
Description: As a member of the OIF, Canada is required to contribute to the operational fees of the organization. This fund constitutes the statutory contribution, a function of the International Organisation of the Francophonie (OIF). |
|||||
Strategic Outcome: ADVANCING CANADA'S INTERESTS INTERNATIONALLY: In partnership with Canadians, Canada and its values are projected to the world, its interests are pursued abroad and Canadians are better able to interpret the world. |
|||||
Expected Results: Canada's contribution to the OIF allows the support of a large array of initiatives such as the realization of specific projects in response to needs expressed by countries or admissible organizations for the preparation of conferences or symposiums, and the implementation of action plans adopted during summits. These initiatives can come from Canadian organizations, institutions or Francophonie operators. |
|||||
Program Activity: |
Forecast |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Global Issues |
12,738,000 |
12,066,000 |
12,066,000 |
12,066,000 |
|
Total Contributions |
12,738,000 |
12,066,000 |
12,066,000 |
12,066,000 |
|
Planned Audits and Evaluations: An audit is planned for the last semester of 2010-2011. |
2 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Commonwealth Secretariat (TB #646044) |
||||
Start Date: September 28, 1965 |
End Date: N/A |
||||
Description: Canada's assessed contribution to the regular budget of the Commonwealth is a legally binding obligation of membership. The purpose of Canada's membership is to further Canada's foreign policy goals related to international peace, security and development and, to this end, to enhance its relationships with the 53 Commonwealth member countries. For further information, see http://www.thecommonwealth.org. |
|||||
Strategic Outcome: ADVANCING CANADA'S INTERESTS INTERNATIONALLY: In partnership with Canadians, Canada and its values are projected to the world, its interests are pursued abroad and Canadians are better able to interpret the world. |
|||||
Expected Results: Much of the regular budget is directed to supporting and implementing the decisions of the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meetings and a large web of regular meetings of Commonwealth sectoral Ministers including, for example, the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group and Ministers of Foreign Affairs, Finance, Health and Education. Results include diplomatic interventions in the form of both good offices and public pressure by the Secretariat and/or co-coordinated action by Commonwealth Ministers to support democratic institutions and procedures; programs to build capacity in democratic and human rights procedures; and enhanced cooperation among Commonwealth countries related to economic, social and political development. |
|||||
Program Activity: |
Forecast |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Global Issues |
5,632,000 |
5,212,000 |
5,212,000 |
5,212,000 |
|
Total Contributions |
5,632,000 |
5,212,000 |
5,212,000 |
5,212,000 |
|
Planned Audits and Evaluations: The next annual external Audit for 2004-2005 accounts will take place end-March 2006. The National Audit Office (UK) recently won the tender to perform audits for the Secretariat for the next 3 years. The Secretariat also conducts regular internal audits through Grant Thornton. |
3 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (TB #783317) |
||||
Start Date: July 1982 |
End Date: N/A |
||||
Description: Canada's annual assessed contribution to the FAO is a legally binding obligation of membership. The purpose of membership is to further the Government of Canada's foreign policy goals related to agricultural development and provide it with a voice in the international community. For further information, see http://www.fao.org. |
|||||
Strategic Outcome: ADVANCING CANADA'S INTERESTS INTERNATIONALLY: In partnership with Canadians, Canada and its values are projected to the world, its interests are pursued abroad and Canadians are better able to interpret the world. |
|||||
Expected Results: Achieving food security for all is at the heart of FAO's efforts - to make sure people have regular access to enough high-quality food to lead active, healthy lives. FAO's mandate is to raise levels of nutrition, improve agricultural productivity, better the lives of rural populations and contribute to the growth of the world economy. FAO's objectives, as set out in its Constitution, are:
Thus, contributing towards an expanding world economy and ensuring humanity's freedom from hunger. |
|||||
Program Activity: |
Forecast |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Global Issues |
13,886,000 |
14,627,000 |
14,627,000 |
14,627,000 |
|
Total Contributions |
13,886,000 |
14,627,000 |
14,627,000 |
14,627,000 |
|
Planned Audits and Evaluations: FAO accounts are subject to internal audit and evaluation, as well as audit by external auditors on a biennial basis. |
4 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: International Labour Organization (ILO) (TB #812690) |
||||
Start Date: January 1, 1989 |
End Date: N/A |
||||
Description: Canada's annual assessed contribution to the ILO, a UN specialized agency, is a legally binding obligation of membership. The purpose of membership is to further the Government of Canada's foreign policy goals related to international labour and social policy issues and provide it with a voice in the international community. For further information, see http:// www.ilo.org. Four strategic objectives guide the ILO program and budget: (i) to promote and realize standards and fundamental principles and rights at work; (ii) to create greater opportunities for women and men to secure decent employment and income; (iii) to enhance the coverage and effectiveness of social protection for all; and (iv) to strengthen tripartism and social dialogue. |
|||||
Strategic Outcome: ADVANCING CANADA'S INTERESTS INTERNATIONALLY: In partnership with Canadians, Canada and its values are projected to the world, its interests are pursued abroad and Canadians are better able to interpret the world. |
|||||
Expected Results:
|
|||||
Program Activity: |
Forecast |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Global Issues |
10,742,000 |
11,108,000 |
11,108,000 |
11,108,000 |
|
Total Contributions |
10,742,000 |
11,108,000 |
11,108,000 |
11,108,000 |
|
Planned Audits and Evaluations: ILO accounts are subject to internal audit and evaluation, as well as audit by external auditors on a biennial basis. |
5 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) TB# 738356 |
||||
Start Date: March 20, 1975 |
End Date: N/A |
||||
Description: To pay the assessed contribution required of Canada for its participation as a member of the OECD. The contribution pays for the Secretariat (professionals and support staff who provide high-quality research and analysis) and maintenance of the headquarters, located in Paris. |
|||||
Objectives: To coordinate, integrate and lead whole-of-government involvement in the OECD that reflects and enhances domestic priorities. To promote and develop Canadian foreign policy objectives (economic stability, governance), as well as a wide variety of OGD policy objectives (e.g. trade policy, development policy) in the OECD's work program of research, analysis, policy development, peer review, and cooperation with non-members. To support and participate in OECD work on management of the institution. Reform and strengthen the OECD as necessary to cope with new issues and power dynamics. |
|||||
Strategic Outcome: ADVANCING CANADA'S INTERESTS INTERNATIONALLY: In partnership with Canadians, Canada and its values are projected to the world, its interests are pursued abroad and Canadians are better able to interpret the world. |
|||||
Expected Results: OECD work programs and policy positions that reflect input from across government and support domestic priorities; continued sound management of the OECD; institutional reforms to improve the OECD's ability to cope with new issues and power dynamics. |
|||||
Program Activity: |
Forecast |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Global Issues |
13,517,000 |
12,714,000 |
12,714,000 |
12,714,000 |
|
Total Contributions |
13,517,000 |
12,714,000 |
12,714,000 |
12,714,000 |
|
Planned Audits and Evaluations: unavailable |
6 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (TB #809653) |
||||
Start Date: January 1, 1988 |
End Date: N/A |
||||
Description: Canada's annual assessed contribution to UNESCO is a legally binding obligation of membership. The purpose of membership is to further the Government of Canada's foreign policy goals related to culture, science and education, and provide it with a voice in the international community. |
|||||
Objective: UNESCO's objective, as set out in its Constitution, is to contribute to peace and security by promoting collaboration among nations through education, science and culture. For further information, see http://www.unesco.org. |
|||||
Strategic Outcome: ADVANCING CANADA'S INTERESTS INTERNATIONALLY: In partnership with Canadians, Canada and its values are projected to the world, its interests are pursued abroad and Canadians are better able to interpret the world. |
|||||
Expected Results:
|
|||||
Program Activity: |
Forecast |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Global Issues |
12,698,000 |
10,676,000 |
10,676,000 |
10,676,000 |
|
Total Contributions |
12,698,000 |
10,676,000 |
10,676,000 |
10,676,000 |
|
Planned Audits and Evaluations: UNESCO accounts are subject to internal audit and evaluation, as well as audit by external auditors on a biennial basis. |
7 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: United Nations Organization (UNO) (TB #769691) |
||||
Start Date: March 27, 1980 |
End Date: N/A |
||||
Description: Canada's assessed contribution to the regular budget of the United Nations is a legally binding obligation of membership. The purpose of membership is to further the Government of Canada's foreign policy goals related to international peace, security and development and provide it with a voice in the international community. Assessed contributions are used to finance the organization's programs toward attainment of the UN's objectives, as set out in its Charter. |
|||||
Objectives:
|
|||||
Strategic Outcome: ADVANCING CANADA'S INTERESTS INTERNATIONALLY: In partnership with Canadians, Canada and its values are projected to the world, its interests are pursued abroad and Canadians are better able to interpret the world. |
|||||
Expected Results: Maintenance of international peace and security and the promotion of sustained economic growth and sustainable development in accordance with the Millennium Development Goals. In particular, progress in the development of Africa; the promotion of human rights; effective coordination of humanitarian assistance efforts; promotion of justice and international law; progress toward disarmament; and international cooperation for drug control, crime prevention and the combatting of international terrorism in all its forms and manifestations. |
|||||
Program Activity: |
Forecast |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Global Issues |
88,832,000 |
107,511,000 |
107,511,000 |
107,511,000 |
|
Total Contributions |
88,832,000 |
107,511,000 |
107,511,000 |
107,511,000 |
|
Planned Audits and Evaluations: The UN has internal mechanisms as well as external auditors to audit the regular financial statements of the organization on a biennial basis. |
8 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: UN Peacekeeping Operations (TB #828489) |
||||
Start Date: October 5, 2000 |
End Date: N/A |
||||
Description: Canada's assessed contribution to UN peacekeeping operations is a legally binding obligation of membership. For further information, see http://www.un.org/Depts/dpko. |
|||||
Objectives: To support the peace process and stabilization of the security situation, and bridge the gap between security and longer-term peacebuilding in affected countries through the timely establishment and maintenance of complex multidisciplinary UN peacekeeping missions. |
|||||
Strategic Outcome: ADVANCING CANADA'S INTERESTS INTERNATIONALLY: In partnership with Canadians, Canada and its values are projected to the world, its interests are pursued abroad and Canadians are better able to interpret the world. |
|||||
Expected Results: Enhanced peace and security for the countries and regions concerned. Increased levels of security, basic services and levels of governance provided in affected areas, which will promote advanced prospects for peace as well as enable reconstruction and development activities. |
|||||
Program Activity: |
Forecst |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Global Issues |
192,323,000 |
211,612,000 |
211,612,000 |
211,612,000 |
|
Total Contributions |
192,323,000 |
211,612,000 |
211,612,000 |
211,612,000 |
|
Planned Audits and Evaluations: The UN has internal mechanisms as well as external auditors to audit the regular financial statements of the organization on a biennial basis. |
9 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: World Health Organization (WHO) (TB #784857) |
||||
Start Date: January 1, 1990 |
End Date: N/A |
||||
Description: Canada's annual assessed contribution to the WHO is a legally binding obligation of membership. The purpose of membership is to further the Government of Canada's foreign policy goals related to health and provide it with a voice in the international community. |
|||||
Strategic Outcome: ADVANCING CANADA'S INTERESTS INTERNATIONALLY: In partnership with Canadians, Canada and its values are projected to the world, its interests are pursued abroad and Canadians are better able to interpret the world. |
|||||
Expected Results:
|
|||||
Program Activity: |
Forecast |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Global Issues |
17,236,000 |
18,314,000 |
18,314,000 |
18,314,000 |
|
Total Contributions |
17,236,000 |
18,314,000 |
18,314,000 |
18,314,000 |
|
Planned Audits and Evaluations: WHO accounts are subject to internal audit and evaluation, as well as audit by external auditors on a biennial basis. |
10 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: World Trade Organization (WTO) (TB #831054) |
||||
Start Date: January 1, 1995 |
End Date: N/A |
||||
Description: The purpose is to pay the assessed contribution for Canada's membership in the WTO. |
|||||
Strategic Outcome: ADVANCING CANADA'S INTERESTS INTERNATIONALLY: In partnership with Canadians, Canada and its values are projected to the world, its interests are pursued abroad and Canadians are better able to interpret the world. |
|||||
Expected Result: Membership in the WTO helps Canada open world markets and contribute to a more stable, predictable and transparent trading environment. |
|||||
Program Activity: |
Forecast |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Global Issues |
6,938,000 |
6,832,000 |
6,832,000 |
6,832,000 |
|
Total Contributions |
6,938,000 |
6,832,000 |
6,832,000 |
6,832,000 |
|
Planned Audits and Evaluations: The World Trade Organization Accounts are subject to an annual audit by external auditors. |
11 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Young Professionals International (YPI) (TB #830375) |
||||
Start Date: February 20, 2003 |
End Date: March 31, 2008 |
||||
Description: The department funds private and public sector partners located in Canada that implement six-month international work placements with their contacts abroad for young Canadian university students and college graduates. The program engages young people in the issues of globalization and Canadian foreign policy while providing them with career-related international experience to enhance their employability. This program also provides a safety and security review function for all Youth Employment Strategy (YES) work experience activities, including those funded by OGDs, to reduce potential consular risks. |
|||||
Objective: To reduce risks, such as personal or physical problems that would result in a consular case, associated with overseas work experiences faced by Canadian youth on YES programs. |
|||||
Strategic Outcome: ADVANCING CANADA'S INTERESTS INTERNATIONALLY: In partnership with Canadians, Canada and its values are projected to the world, its interests are pursued abroad and Canadians are better able to interpret the world. |
|||||
Expected Results:
Ultimate Outcomes:
|
|||||
Program Activity: |
Forecast |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Global Issues |
5,854,700 |
5,854,700 |
5,854,700 |
5,854,700 |
|
Total Contributions |
5,854,700 |
5,854,700 |
5,854,700 |
5,854,700 |
|
Planned Audits and Evaluations: An audit was released in 2005, and an evaluation is under way and will be completed by April 1, 2006. |
12 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Organization of American States (OAS) (TB #814057) |
||||
Start Date: May 31, 1990 |
End Date: N/A |
||||
Description: To pay Canada's annual quota assessment to the Organization of American States (OAS), a Charter obligation of membership. |
|||||
Strategic Outcome: ADVANCING CANADA'S INTERESTS INTERNATIONALLY: In partnership with Canadians, Canada and its values are projected to the world, its interests are pursued abroad and Canadians are better able to interpret the world. |
|||||
Expected Results:
|
|||||
Program Activity: |
Forecast |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Global Issues |
12,084,000 |
11,195,000 |
11,195,000 |
11,195,000 |
|
Total Contributions |
12,084,000 |
11,195,000 |
11,195,000 |
11,195,000 |
|
Planned Audits and Evaluations: A yearly evaluation of the resources of the OAS General Secretariat is conducted by the Board of External Auditors, an external audit committee in charge of examining the accounts of the General Secretariat, including that of the OAS Regular Fund (to which the member states assessed contribution is devoted). The Board of External Auditors which is composed of three elected members, who represent the OAS Member States, presents their report to the OAS Permanent Council and the General Assembly. An Inspector General is also responsible to proceed with the internal auditing procedures to verify compliance with standards and regulations in force, especially through systematic and selective examination of official transactions and operational procedures related to the resources administered by the General Secretariat. The Inspector General's reports are presented quarterly and annually to the Permanent Council. (For further info on the auditing mechanisms and procedures at the OAS, please consult the General Standards to Govern the Operations of the OAS General Secretariat or visit this site: http://www.oas.org/legal/english/Standards/GenStandCapIX.htm. |
13 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: International Criminal Court (ICC) TBS #830101 |
||||
Start Date: April 1, 2005 |
End Date: N/A |
||||
Description: ICC is an assessed contribution transfer payment. |
|||||
Objectives: Investigation and prosecution of individuals suspected of genocide, war crimes and/or crimes against humanity. Helping to address impunity issues generally through complementary jurisdiction. |
|||||
Strategic Outcome: ADVANCING CANADA'S INTERESTS INTERNATIONALLY: In partnership with Canadians, Canada and its values are projected to the world, its interests are pursued abroad and Canadians are better able to interpret the world. |
|||||
Expected Results: Investigation and prosecution of individuals suspected of the most serious international crimes in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Sudan and northern Uganda. First prosecution to take place in 2006. |
|||||
Program Activity: |
Forecast |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Global Issues |
5,572,000 |
7,018,000 |
7,018,000 |
7,018,000 |
|
Total Contributions |
5,572,000 |
7,018,000 |
7,018,000 |
7,018,000 |
|
Planned Audits and Evaluations: The Committee on Budget and Finance (CBF), which is comprised of various state parties and meets twice a year , will be meeting in April 2006. |
14 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Projects and Development Activities Resulting from Francophone Summits TB# 830314 |
||||
Start Date: March 9, 1979 |
End Date: N/A |
||||
Description: This fund provides funding to cooperation programs and activities undertaken by the International Organisation of the Francophonie (IOF). It also provides financial support to the Government of New Brunswick to foster its participation in international Francophonie activities. This fund helps to promote Canadian interests and is consistent with political and economic objectives Canada has set itself for La Francophonie. It also promotes active participation from the Government of New-Brunswick in Summits, Ministerial Conferences and other related Francophonie activities. |
|||||
Objectives: This fund reflects the importance of La Francophonie within Canadian society. It indicates the political commitment of the Government of Canada toward La Francophonie and its active participation in a key multilateral organization. The fund also promotes Canadian development and foreign policy interests in a multilateral context. |
|||||
Strategic Outcomes: ADVANCING CANADA'S INTERESTS INTERNATIONALLY: In partnership with Canadians, Canada and its values are projected to the world, its interests are pursued abroad and Canadians are better able to interpret the world. |
|||||
Expected Results:
|
|||||
Program Activity: |
Forecast |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Global Issues |
7,500,000 |
7,500,000 |
7,500,000 |
7,500,000 |
|
Total Contributions |
7,500,000 |
7,500,000 |
7,500,000 |
7,500,000 |
|
Planned Audits and Evaluations: An audit is planned for the last semester of 2010-2011. |
15 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contributions to Canada's Clean Development Mechanism and Joint Implementation (CDM & JI) |
||||
Start Date: 2001 |
End Date: 2006 (Decision on extension to 2006-2007 pending) |
||||
Description: Canada's CDM & JI Office Program encourages and undertakes programs and initiatives that will facilitate Canadian entities' participation in the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and Joint Implementation (JI) and contribute to Canada's ability to meet its climate change commitments from the Kyoto Protocol through cost-effective greenhouse gas emission reductions. The contributions are used primarily for three activities: contributions to workshops and meetings, project facilitation centres, and multilateral and bilateral initiatives aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions and generating carbon credits. The program is a Kyoto requirement, as the Office acts as Canada's Designated National Authority for the CDM and the focal point for JI, providing approval for projects involving Canadian participants. The Office assists in building a strong Canadian capability to develop, register and implement emission reduction and sequestration projects which, along with project-based emissions trading, will help to meet Canada's emission reduction target. |
|||||
Objectives: (1) to strengthen Canada's capacity to take maximum advantage of the Kyoto Mechanisms, including the CDM & JI; (2) to encourage and facilitate Canadian participation in the market mechanisms by building awareness, promoting cost-effective opportunities, and ensuring lower transaction costs, while also engaging developing countries in such activities; and (3) to assist Canadian companies in obtaining emissions reduction credits from the CDM & JI type projects according to international rules and guidelines. |
|||||
Strategic Outcome: ADVANCING CANADA'S INTERESTS INTERNATIONALLY: In partnership with Canadians, Canada and its values are projected to the world, its interests are pursued abroad and Canadians are better able to interpret the world. |
|||||
Expected Results: The Office's activities are expected to have several results, including:
|
|||||
Program Activity: |
Forecast |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Global Issues |
5,800,000 |
Decision pending |
0 |
0 |
|
Total Contributions |
5,800,000 |
||||
Planned Audits and Evaluations: Two completed in 2005-2006. This fulfills the requirements of the terms and conditions. |
|||||
Total Program Activity: Global Issues |
411,352,700 |
442,239,700 |
442,239,700 |
442,239,700 |
|
Total Transfer Payments |
411,352,700 |
442,239,700 |
442,239,700 |
442,239,700 |
Program Activity: Strategic Policy and Public Diplomacy
1 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Grants in Aid of Cultural Relations (TB #829976) |
||||
Start Date: August 7, 2002 |
End Date: March 31, 2007 |
||||
Description: This program aims to achieve the following:
|
|||||
Objective: The advancement of Canadian foreign policy objectives through the promotion of Canadian culture abroad. |
|||||
Strategic Outcome: ADVANCING CANADA'S INTERESTS INTERNATIONALLY: In partnership with Canadians, Canada and its values are projected to the world, its interests are pursued abroad and Canadians are better able to interpret the world. |
|||||
Expected Results: The creation of an image abroad of Canadian culture as first class, innovative and diverse; foreign professionals and leaders with an informed, well-disposed and sustained interest in Canada. In the short term, Canadian professional artists will be involved in high-quality cultural presentations abroad; foreign agents, impresarios and commissioning editors will be engaged in Canadian art festivals and showcases; and there will be an adequate representation of Canada through arts in promotional activities abroad. |
|||||
Program Activity: |
Forecast |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Strategic Policy and Public Diplomacy |
4,694,000 |
7,849,000 |
7,849,000 |
7,849,000 |
|
Total Grants |
4,694,000 |
7,849,000 |
7,849,000 |
7,849,000 |
|
Planned Audits and Evaluations: unavailable |
1 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Grants in Aid of Academic Relations (TB #) |
||||
Start Date: January 1, 1989 |
End Date: March 31, 2006 |
||||
Description: Grants and Contributions in Aid of Academic Relations in 2006-2007 encompass grants such as:
These programs support Public Diplomacy strategies throughout the department, by promoting the following:
They foster stronger partnerships with Canadians, through partnerships with academic and youth institutions, associations, organizations and individuals. They advance Canada's global citizenship and contribute to the modernization of the International Assistance envelope through scholarships and other programs of academic cooperation with developing countries in support of public diplomacy and peace and security objectives. They assist in main streaming public diplomacy within DFAIT, and contribute to the realignment of resources and programs within the department. |
|||||
Objective: To improve knowledge of Canadian issues among key foreign audiences and to increase participation of Canadians and foreigners in the Division's programs. |
|||||
Strategic Outcome: ADVANCING CANADA'S INTERESTS INTERNATIONALLY: In partnership with Canadians, Canada and its values are projected to the world, its interests are pursued abroad and Canadians are better able to interpret the world. |
|||||
Expected Results:
|
|||||
Program Activity: |
Forecast |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Strategic Policy and Public Diplomacy |
11,810,000 |
13,500,000 |
13,500,000 |
13,500,000 |
|
Total Grants |
11,810,000 |
13,500,000 |
13,500,000 |
13,500,000 |
|
Planned Audits and Evaluations: Program evaluation was completed in July 2005. Financial audit will be undertaken in 2006-2007. |
Program Activity: Protocol
1 |
Name of Transfer Payment Program: Payments in lieu of taxes on diplomatic, consular and international organizations' property in Canada (TB #826663) |
||||
Start Date: January 18, 1979 |
End Date: N/A |
||||
Description: The purpose of this memorandum of understanding (MOU) is to outline the relationship between the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade and Public Works and Government Services Canada, National Capital Area, under the Diplomatic, Consular and International Organizations' Property Grants Order (P.C.1979-59, January 18, 1979), the Municipal Grants Act, and successor Orders and Acts. It establishes responsibilities and procedures governing the provision of services related to the payment of grants in lieu of real property and frontage or area taxes with respect to diplomatic property. These procedures are designed to ensure fiscal and operational accountability, while promoting efficient program delivery. |
|||||
Strategic Outcome: ADVANCING CANADA'S INTERESTS INTERNATIONALLY: In partnership with Canadians, Canada and its values are projected to the world, its interests are pursued abroad and Canadians are better able to interpret the world. |
|||||
Expected Results: To fulfill Canada's international obligations to foreign diplomatic and consular missions pursuant to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations as well as obligations pursuant to headquarters agreements in force between Canada and international organizations. |
|||||
Program Activity: |
Forecast |
Planned |
Planned |
Planned |
|
Protocol |
10,247,828 |
10,575,136 |
10,908,000 |
11,240,000 |
|
Total Grants |
10,247,828 |
10,575,136 |
10,908,000 |
11,240,000 |
|
Planned Audits and Evaluations: No audits & evaluations are planned for this account. |
|||||
Total Program Activity: Protocol |
10,247,828 |
10,575,136 |
10,908,000 |
11,240,000 |
|
Total Transfer Payments |
10,247,828 |
10,575,136 |
10,908,000 |
11,240,000 |
Horizontal Initiative: U.S. Enhanced Representation Initiative (ERI) |
Lead Department(s): Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade |
||||
Start Date: September 17, 2003 |
End Date: March 31, 2008 |
||||
Total Funding Allocated: $118.2 million |
|||||
Description: The ERI is a partnership of eight federal departments and agencies. The ERI provides a coordinated and integrated approach and direction to managing and advancing Canada's advocacy, trade, business development, science and technology, and investment interests in the United States. This is done through the collaboration of ERI partners and consultation with other federal government departments, provinces and territories, and other stakeholders. When fully implemented, the ERI partnership will oversee a network of 43 U.S. points of contact through consulates general, consulates, trade offices and honorary consuls. |
|||||
Shared Outcome(s): Outcomes reflect total Canadian government efforts respecting advocacy and business development with the United States set in the international economic environment. Specific outcomes are defined by the ERI's Results-based Management and Accountability Framework (RMAF): Short-term Outcomes:
Medium-term Outcomes:
Long-term Outcomes:
|
|||||
Governance Structure(s): The ERI Partnership is managed through a formal governance structure including a Deputy Ministers Steering Committee, an Assistant Deputy Ministers Policy Committee, a Directors General Operations Committee and three director-level Standing Committees: Advocacy and Business Development, Communications and Human Resources. Day-to-day operations are managed by the ERI Secretariat, which is responsible to the ERI Partnership, through the governance structure, for planning, implementing and evaluating the ERI's annual action plan. The ERI Secretariat is accountable administratively to its host department, the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade , which provides financial, human resources and physical resource services to the Secretariat. |
|||||
Federal Partners Involved |
Names of Programs |
|
Planned Spending 2006-2007 |
|
|
|
a. Representation | $78,070 | $20,269 | Complete staffing | |
b. Advocacy and Business Development | $24,837 | $7,450 | "whole of government approach" | ||
c. Corporate / Governance | $8,248 | $2,047 | Formative Evaluation -Complete and implement recommendations | ||
d. Reserve / unallocated* | $7,045 | $11,687 | |||
*to be allocated to programs by March 31, 2006 | Total | $118,200 | $41,453 | ||
Contact: Wolf Nowak, Manager, Strategic Planning and Analysis, U.S. Enhanced Representation Initiative Secretariat (ERI), Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) |
Approved by: |
Date Approved: |
Horizontal Initiative: Global Peace and Security Fund |
Lead Department(s): Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade |
||||
Start Date: October 3, 2003 |
End Date: March 31, 2010 |
||||
Total Funding Allocated: $ 610,599,000 |
|||||
Description: The Global Peace and Security Fund (GPSF), its component programmes (Global Peace and Security Programme, Global Peace Operations Programme, and the Human Security Programme) was established at at $100 million per year for five years to support urgent contributions to crisis response operations, continue to address Canada's G8 Sea Island commitment to help build global peace support capacity, and provide resources to Canada's human security commitments. Funded from the Peace and Security Pool of the International Assistance Envelope (IAE), the GPSF will fill a funding gap by providing dedicated resources for activities that are necessary for a timely response with respect to countries at risk of crisis, but are not properly the responsibility of DND and are outside the core purposes of Canada's Official Development Assistance Programme. Examples of these activities are support for peace processes and mediation efforts, transitional justice and reconciliation and improving the peace enforcement and peace support capacities of African militaries. |
|||||
Shared Outcome(s): The ultimate outcome is expected to be an improved Canadian contribution to peace and security and the safety and well being of beneficiaries living in targeted areas. Specific outcomes are defined by the ERI's Results-based Management and Accountability Framework (RMAF). Strategic outcomes are:
|
|||||
Governance Structure(s): The GPSF is managed by the START Secretariat in the context of a whole-of-government approach coordinated through the START Advisory Board. Chaired by the Director General of the START Secretariat and comprised of senior officials from across government, the START Advisory Board is responsible for establishing a whole-of-government strategic policy, priority-setting and direction with respect to failed and fragile states and complex emergencies within the framework of individual departmental authorities, as well as providing a platform for information exchange on programme-related activities to ensure complementarity and avoid duplication. The START Secretariat is located in the International Security Branch of the Department of Foreign Affairs, and is accountable to DFAIT, which is responsible for the financial, human resources and physical resource services for START. |
|||||
Federal Partners Involved |
Names of Programs |
|
Planned Spending 2006-2007 |
|
|
|
a. Peacebuilding in Sudan | - | 45,500 | Implementation of peacebuilding projects in Sudan | |
b. Operations in Afghanistan | - | 8,344 | Supporting Provincial Reconstruction Teams in Kandahar | ||
c. Establishment of the GPSF and its component programmes (GPSP, HSP, GPOP); and full establishment of the START Secretariat | - | 88,156 | Implementation of projects and full establishment of START Secretariat | ||
Total |
(Note) | 142,000 | |||
Note: Pending TBS approval of the second GPSF TB Submission seeking complete programme funding authorization, the total Allocation is to be confirmed. | |||||
Contact: Tim Martin |
Approved by: Tim Martin |
Date Approved: March 27, 2006 |
Horizontal Initiative: Team Canada Inc (TCI) |
Lead Department(s): DFAIT, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Canadian Heritage, Industry Canada and Natural Resources Canada (executive members) plus other federal departments and agencies |
||||
Start Date: 1997 |
End Date: Ongoing |
||||
Total Funding Allocated: The initiative had an annual budget of $1.3 million. Federal partner members of TCI contribute $50,000 each per year, with the aforementioned executive members contributing $150,000 each. Other partners contribute a range of products and services that address the various needs of Canadian exporters. |
|||||
Description: Team Canada Inc is a network of federal departments and agencies working with the provinces and territories and other partners to help Canadian businesses succeed in world markets. TCI's purpose is to provide the Canadian business community with single-window access to fully integrated Government of Canada services with a view to enhancing exporter capability and preparedness in international market development. Government of Canada priorities that are addressed by TCI include:
|
|||||
Shared Outcome(s): According to the Common Performance Measurement Framework developed by TCI, common or shared outcomes (immediate and intermediate) are as follows:
Intermediate Outcomes:
Expenditures totalling $1.3 million in 2006-2007 will support the above shared outcomes. Due to the nature of the outcomes (i.e. diverse activities by multiple partners collectively contribute to a given outcome), it is impossible to allocate specific funding amounts to each. |
|||||
Governance Structure(s): A Management Board (currently chaired by International Trade Canada) is responsible for planning, directing, managing and implementing this horizontal program. Day-to-day operations of TCI are managed by the TCI Directorate (consisting of five full-time staff), which is accountable to the host department (currently DFAIT) management structure. The TCI Directorate is responsible for directing and managing TCI Directorate human and financial resources, and implementing TCI's annual action plan. The Management Board consists of a Director General (DG)-level official (or equivalent) from each TCI federal member organization. There is also an Executive Committee, which consists of the five DG-level Management Board representatives from the five core members of TCI (i.e. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Canadian Heritage, DFAIT, Industry Canada, and Natural Resources Canada). Each TCI partner provides specific products and services depending upon its mandate, which could focus on a particular function (e.g. export insurance), industry sector (e.g. natural resources) or geographic area (e.g. Alberta). |
|||||
Federal Partners Involved |
Names of Programs |
|
Planned Spending 2006-2007 |
|
|
All 16 of TCI's members contribute to all programs and contributions are pooled. | Online Export Portal | $450,000 | $450,000 | See outcomes listed above; all of these activities contribute to the achievement of these outcomes. | |
1-888 Export Information Service | $350,000 | $350,000 | |||
Information products | $230,000 | $230,000 | |||
Regional trade networks | $270,000 | $270,000 | |||
Total $: | $1,300,000 | $1,300,000 | |||
Contact: Michael Calvert, Director, Team Canada Inc Tel.: (613) 952-7396 Email: calvert.michael@exportsource.ca |
Approved by: |
Date Approved: |