ARCHIVED - Horizontal Internal Audit of Electronic Recordkeeping in Small Departments and Agencies
This page has been archived.
Archived Content
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
Appendix A: Small
Departments and Agencies Included in the Audit
- Canada Industrial Relations Board
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
- Canadian Forces Grievance Board
- Canadian Human Rights Commission
- Canadian Intergovernmental Conference Secretariat
- Financial Transactions and Report Analysis Centre of Canada
- Military Police Complaints Commission of Canada
- National Film Board
- Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs Canada
- Office of the Secretary to the Governor General
- Public Service Labour Relations Board
- RCMP External Review Committee
- Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada
- Veterans Review and Appeal Board
The following departments were also
included in the audit as they play a central role in the delivery of the
Government of Canada Information Management Strategy.
- Library & Archives Canada
- Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Appendix
B: Links to Applicable Legislation, Frameworks, Policies, Directives and
Guidance
Sources of Criteria and Web Link
Appendix C: Objectives and Related Criteria
Objectives and Criteria
The objective of this audit was to determine whether SDAs and departments
that have a central role are fulfilling the requirements of the IM policy suite,
with a particular focus on electronic recordkeeping.
Departments have governance structures in place to effectively support an
IM strategy and IM outcomes.
- Governance structures, mechanisms and resources are in place to ensure
the continuous and effective management of information.
- Monitoring and reporting processes are in place for IM.
- Departments participate in setting government-wide direction for
information and recordkeeping.
- TBS supports the alignment of departmental strategy and IM approaches
with Government of Canada policy instruments.
Departments are developing highly skilled workforces to ensure that
capacity exists to deliver IM outcomes.
- Departments have a common body of knowledge, learning and assessment
tools.
- Departments have a common understanding of common policy instruments
and assessment tools.
- The Government of Canada has promoted and encouraged a common
alignment of departmental IM functions.
Departments are developing information architecture and processes that
respect their IM risks and controls, and operational requirements.
- Information and records are identified and managed as valuable assets
to support the outcomes of programs and services, as well as operational
needs and accountabilities.
- Government programs and services provide convenient access to
relevant, reliable, comprehensive and timely information.
- Departments that play a central role in IM are assisting departments
to ensure information is shared within and across departments to the
greatest extent possible.
IM tools are developed and implemented that respect appropriate control
requirements of the department and of the business users, and are compliant with
the information architecture within and across departments.
- Departments develop and implement common and enterprise-wide tools and
applications.
- The Government of Canada has adopted common and enterprise-wide tools
and applications.
Recordkeeping practices ensure that information is timely, accurate, and
accessible for departments in the delivery of Government of Canada programs and
services.
- All information is managed to ensure the relevance, authenticity,
quality, and cost-effectiveness of the information for as long as it is
required to meet operational needs and accountabilities.
- LAC issues records disposition authorities pursuant to section 12 of
the Library and Archives of Canada Act, to enable departments to carry out
their records retention and disposition plans.
- Departmental programs and services integrate IM requirements into
development, implementation, evaluation, and reporting activities.
Appendix D:
Recommendations by Department and Agency
The applicability of the
recommendations below to each department is subject to variability. Some
departments may not have begun addressing some these recommendations, while
others may be closer to implementing a final action required.
| Recommendations |
SDAs |
| CIRB |
CEAA |
CFGB |
CHRC |
CICS |
FINTRAC |
MPCC |
NFB |
OCFJA |
OSGG |
PSLRB |
ERC |
TRC |
VRAB |
Risk Ranking |
|
Legend
- A
- Applicable
- N/A
- Not Applicable
- CIRB
- Canada Industrial Relations Board
- CEAA
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
- CFGB
- Canadian Forces Grievance Board
- CHRC
- Canadian Human Rights Commission
- CICS
- Canadian Intergovernmental Conference Secretariat
- FINTRAC
- Financial Transactions and Report Analysis Centre of Canada
- MPCC
- Military Police Complaints Commission of Canada
- NFB
- National Film Board
- OCFJA
- Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs Canada
- OSGG
- Office of the Secretary to the Governor General
- PSLRB
- Public Service Labour Relations Board
- ERC
- RCMP External Review Committee
- TRC
- Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada
- VRAB
- Veterans Review and Appeal Board
|
1. SDAs should develop IM plans appropriate to the size and scope of their IM needs, and include measurable performance indicators to be able to monitor the effectiveness of the plans. |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
N/A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
High |
2. SDAs should define information of business value for their organization and develop methods to ensure it is tracked and stored in an effective manner. |
A |
N/A |
N/A |
A |
A |
N/A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
N/A |
A |
N/A |
High |
3. SDAs should develop strategies to increase the use of enterprise-wide electronic recordkeeping systems within their department. |
A |
N/A |
N/A |
A |
A |
N/A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
High |
4. SDAs, in collaboration with LAC, should develop formal retention and disposition processes that can be followed by all departmental staff. |
A |
A |
N/A |
A |
A |
N/A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
N/A |
A |
A |
High |
5. SDAs should perform electronic recordkeeping training needs analyses for departmental staff, and implement actions required. |
A |
N/A |
N/A |
A |
A |
N/A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
N/A |
A |
A |
Medium |
[1]. The Office of the Comptroller General has not
undergone an external assessment of its audit activity at least once in the past five years to confirm its conformance with these standards.
[2]The SDA community, as defined by the Community of Federal Agencies, is broader than that defined by the Policy on Internal Audit