This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
Name of Horizontal Initiative: The Canadian Group on Earth Observations is a collection of federal departments participating in the international Group on Earth Observations (GEO).
Name of Lead Department(s): Environment Canada is the lead department by virtue of the identification of the ADM of the Meteorological Service of Canada as the GEO Principal.
Lead Department Program Activity: Canadians are equipped to make informed decisions on changing weather, water and climate conditions.
Start Date: July 2003. There are no dedicated funds; however, this initiative is funded from existing resource envelope (A-Base).
End Date: Ongoing.
Total Federal Funding Allocation (from start date to end date): Provided through existing resource envelope and in-kind contributions from federal departments.
Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement): The GEO is seeking to implement the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS), which will allow free and open access to Earth observations for decision- and policy-makers in all countries. In so doing, users such as Environment Canada and other participating departments will be better able to more accurately predict the future state of planet Earth and better warn citizens of the onset of hazardous conditions. See the GEO website for more details at http://www.earthobservations.org/.
Shared Outcome(s)
Governance Structure(s): Coordination is achieved through the ADM Steering Committee, the DG‑level Interdepartmental Coordinating Committee (ICC) and ad hoc working-level committees and task groups.
Performance Highlights:
Federal Partners | Federal Partner Program Activity | Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Total Allocation (from start date to end date) | 2010-2011 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Planned Spending | Actual Spending | Expected Results | Results Achieved | ||||
1 Environment Canada | PA1 Weather and environmental services for Canadians | a. Meteorological Service of Canada | Not available | $150,000 salary $75,000 O&M $38,000 G&C $25,000 in-kind |
$100,000 salary $50,000 O&M $88,000 G&C $50,000 in-kind |
See below | See below |
2 Natural Resources Canada | PA1 N/A | a. Earth Sciences Sector | Not available | Not available | Not available | See below | See below |
b. Canadian Forest Service | Not available | Not available | Not available | See below | See below | ||
3 Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada | PA1 N/A | a. Agri-Environment Services Branch | Not available | $20,000 In-kind TBD |
Not available | See below | See below |
b. Research Branch | Not available | $20,000 In-kind TBD |
Not available | See below | See below | ||
4 Canadian Space Agency | PA1 N/A | a. Earth Observations | Not available | $40,000 In-kind TBD |
Not available | See below | See below |
5 Fisheries and Oceans Canada | PA1 N/A | a. Science and Technology | Not available | Not available | Not available | See below | See below |
6 Health Canada | PA1 N/A | a. Radiation | Not available | Not available | Not available | See below | See below |
7 Statistics Canada | PA1 N/A | a. Agriculture | Not available | Not available | Not available | See below | See below |
8 Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada | PA1 N/A | a Environment | Not available | Not available | Not available | See below | See below |
9 National Defence | PA1 N/A | a. Meteorology and Oceanography | Not available | Not available | Not available | See below | See below |
Total |
Comments on Variances: In general, Environment Canada expenditures in terms of salary and O&M for GEO were reduced as a result of limited capacity being redirected to other priorities. In terms of grants and contributions, in the past DFAIT made a contribution of $50K to GEO, which the department stopped doing a couple of years ago. Environment Canada has been able to find room in its grants and contributions budget to continue to keep the Canadian contribution at $88K since that time.
Environment Canada:
Results Achieved in 2010–2011:
Environment Canada:
Results Achieved by Non-federal Partners (if applicable): Not applicable
Contact Information:
Michael Crowe
Director, Strategic Integration
Meteorological Service of Canada
Environment Canada
141 Laurier Ave. W.,
Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3
613-943-5580
Name of Horizontal Initiative: The Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP), approved March 2005 (followed from the two-year Federal Contaminated Sites Accelerated Action Plan (FCSAAP)).
Name of Lead Department(s): Environment Canada and Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat.
Lead Department Program Activity: Threats to Canadians and their environment from pollution are minimized (EC); Management Policy Development and Oversight (TBS).
Start Date: The FCSAP has been in effect since April 2005. Former two-year FCSAAP program commenced April 2003.
End Date: The FCSAP is expected to continue until 2020. However, the current policy approval ended in March 31, 2011.
Total Federal Funding Allocation (from start date to end date): $1,775.5 M (including PWGSC accommodations charges) to March 31, 2011.
Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement): The Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP) provides a long-term mechanism to address federal contaminated sites having the highest human health and ecological risks. At the end of March 2004, federal contaminated sites represented a financial liability of approximately $3.5 billion. Although responsibility for the actual management and remediation of federal contaminated sites rests with responsible custodial departments, the overall program is administered jointly by Environment Canada and the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat.
Shared Outcome(s): Reduce federal financial liability and risks to human health and the environment, including fish habitat. Increase public confidence in the overall management of federal real property through the effective risk management or remediation of individual federal contaminated sites.
Governance Structure(s): The Federal Contaminated Sites Assistant Deputy Ministers Steering Committee is supported by the Director Generals’ Committee, the Contaminated Sites Management Working Group (CSMWG) and the FCSAP Secretariat (Environment Canada), which provides overall program coordination.
Performance Highlights: Fiscal year 2010–2011 represented the second year of FCSAP accelerated activities under Canada’s Economic Action Plan (CEAP). Along with ongoing assessment and remediation activities undertaken during the year by FCSAP partners, Environment Canada developed, in collaboration with the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat and 16 other participating federal entities, a proposal seeking program and policy approval for the FCSAP for the next 5 years. Several key program aspects and tools were developed during 2010–2011 to improve decision making, performance measurement and program reporting.
Federal Partners | Federal Partner Program Activity | Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Total Allocation (from start date to end date) | 2010-2011 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Planned Spending1 | Actual Spending1,2 | Expected Results | Results Achieved | ||||
Agriculture and Agri- FoodCanada |
Enterprise Activities | Asset Management | $5,465,649 | 1,282,000 | 1,168,637 | See below | |
Canada Border Services Agency | Corporate Management and Direction | Infra- structure and Environment |
$1,620,212 | $0 | $0 | NA | |
Canadian Food Inspection Agency | N/A | N/A | $183,783 | $0 | $0 | NA | |
Correctional Service Canada | Internal Services | Facilities/ Asset Management Services |
$10,368,090 | $4,867,669 | $3,215,092 | See below | |
Environ- ment Canada |
Threats to Canadians and their environment from pollution are minimized | Asset Remediation and Disposal | $48,874,994 | $16,213,037 | $12,110,733 | Custodian | |
Contamina- ted Sites |
$44,900,126 | $6,640,375 | $5,804,727 | Secretariat and Expert Support | |||
Subtotal | $93,775,120 | $22,853,412 | $17,915,460 | ||||
Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) | Internal Services | Contamina- ted Sites – FCSAP projects |
$78,437,194 | $22,277,365 | $22,202,165 | Custodian | |
FCSAP Expert Support | $21,665,285 | $3,335,637 | $3,336,166 | Expert Support | |||
Subtotal | $100,102,479 | $25,613,002 | $25,538,331 | ||||
Health Canada | First Nations and Inuit Health | First Nations and Inuit Health Protection | $7,445,162 | $536,000 | $195,792 | Custodian | |
Contamina- ted Sites |
Healthy Environ- ments Consumer Safety Branch |
$43,721,890 | $6,689,725 | $6,686,888 | Expert Support | ||
Subtotal | $51,167,052 | $7,225,725 | $6,882,680 | ||||
Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Develop- ment Canada |
Responsible Federal Stewardship | Contamina- ted Sites Management Program |
$148,254,393 | $48,563,181 | $51,706,447 | See below | |
Northern Land and Resources | Contamina- ted Sites |
$685,536,311 | $139,912,237 | $139,617,268 | See below. | ||
Subtotal | $833,790,704 | $188,475,418 | $191,323,715 | ||||
Jacques Cartier and Champlain Bridges Incorpo- rated |
Management of federal bridge, highway and tunnel infra- structure, and properties in the Montréal area |
N/A | $955,672 | $293,000 | $0 | See below | |
Marine Atlantic Inc. | Corporate Management | FCSAP (projects) | $120,000 | $70,000 | $0 | See below | |
National Capital Commission | Real Asset Management | Land and real asset management | $8,600,052 | $3,620,000 | $3,535,028 | See below | |
National Defence | Environ- mental Protection and Stewardship |
A Defence Contamina- ted Sites Management Plan in which funding is provided to clean up worst sites first |
$380,070,345 | $61,064,529 | $55,943,233 | See below | |
National Research Council of Canada | Internal Services | Environ- mental Operations |
$4,835,000 | $2,455,000 | $2,533,151 | See below | |
Natural Resources Canada | Corporate Management | The provision of relevant and timely policy analysis and advice for decision making on government priorities and departmental responsi- bilities |
$27,915,807 | $8,970,000 | $9,239,527 | See below | |
Parks Canada | Conserve Heritage Resources | Active Management and Restoration | $38,814,369 | $16,589,822 | $18,344,878 | See below | |
Public Works and Government Services Canada | Federal Accommoda- tion and Holdings |
FCSAP (projects) | $26,360,173 | $5,203,785 | $14,410,745 | See below | |
FCSAP (expert services) | $5,450,000 | $900,000 | $879,824 | See below | |||
Subtotal | $31,810,173 | $6,103,785 | $15,290,569 | ||||
Royal Canadian Mounted Police | Corporate Infra- structure / Internal Services |
FCSAP (projects) | $23,100,214 | $4,500,500 | $3,309,699 | See below | |
Transport Canada | Sustainable Transporta- tion Development and the Environment |
Environ- mental Programs |
$150,758,925 | $62,266,540 | $28,439,600 | See below | |
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat | Management Policy Development and Oversight | Assets and Acquired Services | $2,747,200 | $480,229 | $478,330 | See below | |
Totals for All Federal Partners | $1,766,200,846 | $416,730,631 | $383,157,930 |
1Excluding PWGSC accommodations charges.
2Actual Spending: Estimate based on information provided by custodians in summer 2011. Program reporting for 2010–2011 will not be finalized before fall 2011.
Expected Results1 and Results Achieved for each Federal Partner:
1 Expected Results: Note that custodians have flexibility with respect to activities undertaken and often the number of sites actually worked on will vary from what was planned due to unforeseen delays (weather, difficult access to remote locations, etc.) or changes in custodian priorities.
Comments on Variances:
For the program as a whole, $12.4 M was reprofiled or carried forward and $37.8 M was lapsed. See below for details.
Results Achieved by Non-Federal Partners (if applicable):
Contact Information:
FCSAP Secretariat
Contaminated Sites Division
15th floor, Place Vincent Massey
351 St-Joseph Blvd.
Gatineau, QC, K1A 0H3
819-934-8153
Name of Horizontal Initiative: Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem Initiative
Name of Lead Department(s): Environment Canada
Lead Department Program Activity: Delivery of the Canada–Ontario Agreement (COA) Respecting the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem
Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative: April 1, 2010 (Great Lakes Action Plan, Phase V (GLAPV) resources)
End Date of the Horizontal Initiative: March 31, 2015 (expiry of GLAPV resources)
Total Federal Funding Allocation (start date to end date): $40 million over 5 years (GLAPV resources, plus departmental resource envelope)
Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement): The Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem Initiative is Environment Canada’s mechanism for coordinating efforts to restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Great Lakes Basin ecosystem, and ensure delivery of federal commitments as expressed in the Canada–U.S. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. Environment Canada uses the Canada–Ontario Agreement (COA) Respecting the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem to engage other federal departments and Ontario in delivering Canada’s Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement commitments.
Environment Canada’s Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem Initiative (GLBEI) reflects Budget 2010 investments targeted at continuing the work under the Great Lakes Action Plan to improve the ecological integrity of the Great Lakes Basin ecosystem. A total of $40 million over five years was allocated in the GLAPV to continue the environmental restoration of key aquatic Great Lakes Areas of Concern. Other federal departments also use resource envelopes to support their efforts towards achieving COA results.
Shared Outcome(s): The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement establishes broad, long-term objectives for Canada and the United States in restoring and protecting the Great Lakes. The COA provides a short-term plan for achieving Canada’s commitments under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. Through the COA, federal and provincial agencies are guided by a shared vision of a healthy, prosperous and sustainable Great Lakes Basin ecosystem for present and future generations. The COA also establishes a common purpose and shared goals, results and commitment in four priority areas: restoration of Areas of Concern; reduction of harmful pollutants; achievement of lakes and basin sustainability; and coordination of monitoring, research and information.
Governance Structure(s): Eight federal departments are engaged in delivering GLBEI results under the COA: Environment Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Natural Resources Canada, Parks Canada, Transport Canada, Infrastructure Canada and Health Canada.
The COA Management Committee is the senior federal/provincial management body responsible for setting priorities, establishing strategies to ensure delivery of the COA, and developing common positions and joint action plans for representing Canadian interests and engaging in cooperative initiatives with United States agencies and the International Joint Commission.
Planning, prioritization and allocation of GLAPV monies is managed through the Great Lakes Division of Environment Canada with the advice of the GLAPV Workplan Review Team. Members of the GLAPV Workplan Review Team consist of representatives from Environment Canada and Fisheries and Oceans Canada receiving GLAPV funds. The GLAPV Workplan Review Team reviews proposed projects and activities, developing and regularly updating a coordinated federal workplan based on priorities required to support Great Lakes Action Plan implementation.
Federal Partners | Federal Partner Program Activity | Names of Programs for Federal Partners | Total Allocation (from start to end date) | 2010-2011 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Planned Spending | Actual Spending | Expected Results | Results Achieved | ||||
Environment Canada | Sustainable use and management of natural capital and working landscapes | COA | $40 million GLAPV, plus Departmental resources envelope (permanent plus temporary funding) | $8 million GLAPV, plus Departmental resources envelope (permanent plus temporary funding) | $4.1 million GLAPV, plus $3.0 million, Departmental resources envelope (permanent plus temporary funding) | All COA results, except App. 2-3.2 | See below |
Fisheries and Oceans Canada | Healthy and productive aquatic ecosystems | COA Sea Lamprey Control Program |
$437.1K GLAPV, plus Departmental resources envelope (permanent plus temporary funding) | $437.1K GLAPV, plus $6.8 million, Departmental resources envelope (permanent plus temporary funding) | $437.1K GLAPV, plus $6.8 million, Departmental resources envelope (permanent plus temporary funding) | App. 1-2.4; App. 1-2.6; App. 3-1.2; App. 3-1.3; App. 3-1.4; App. 3-3.1; App. 3-3.2; App. 3-4.1; App. 3-4.2; App. 3-5.1; App. 4-1.1; App. 4-2.2 | See below |
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada | Health of the environment | Growing Forward | $57 million for environment and climate change from April 1, 2008, to March 31, 2013 | $7.7 million | $7.7 million | App. 1-1.2; App. 1-2.2; App. 2-2.3; App. 3-1.2; App. 3-1.4; App. 3-2.2; App. 4-1.1; App. 4-2.2 | See below |
Natural Resources Canada | Canada is a world leader on environmental responsibility in the development and use of natural resources | Port Hope Long-term Low-level Radioactive Waste Mgmt. Project | Departmental resources envelope (permanent plus temporary funding) | Port Hope $940K Harvesting $32K Pesticides $125.5K |
Port Hope $910K Harvesting $21K Pesticides $117.1K |
App. 1-2.3; App. 3-1.4; App. 3-2.4 | See below |
CFS Forest harvesting in riparian zones |
|||||||
Ecosystem risk management: Canada understands and mitigates risks to natural resource ecosystems and human health | CFS Pesticides Program | ||||||
Parks Canada | Heritage resources conservation Public appreciation and understanding |
COA | Departmental resources envelope (permanent plus temporary funding) | $0 | $0 | App. 3-1.1; App. 3-1.2; App. 3-1.3; App. 3-2.2; App. 3-3.2; App. 3-3.3; App. 4-1.1; App. 4-2.2 | See below |
Transport Canada | Environmental protection and remediation; Canadian Ballast Water Program | COA | Departmental resources envelope (permanent plus temporary funding) | $955K | $955K | App. 3-1.3; App. 3-2.1; App. 3-4.1; App. 3-4.2 | See below |
Infrastructure Canada (INFC) | Infrastructure funding programs | The Building Canada plan (Building Canada Fund, Provincial/ Territorial Base Fund, and Gas Tax Fund), the Green Infrastructure Fund, as well as sunsetting programs (Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF), Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF). |
No COA allocation | No COA allocation | No COA allocation | INFC supports the objectives of the COA with particular emphasis on Appendix items 1-1.1 and App. 1-2.1 | See below |
Health Canada | Healthy environments and consumer safety | COA | Departmental resources envelope (permanent plus temporary funding) | No departmental resources envelope (permanent plus temporary funding) COA commitment incorporated in Chemicals Management Plan (CMP) initiatives |
$* | App. 2-3.2 | See below |
TOTAL GLAP V (plus departmental funding) |
$8.4 million | $4.5 million |
* Activities are supported with funds from Canada’s Chemicals Management Plan (CMP).
Results achieved in 2010–2011:
Specific Results by Department:
Work continued to achieve progress in restoration of Great Lakes Areas of Concern. In delivering its results, the Department
Work continued to reduce the release of harmful substances. Environment Canada worked on a variety of activities and projects. In delivering its results, the Department
Work continued to achieve a better understanding of, and to report on the Great Lakes Basin ecosystem status and trends. Environment Canada worked collaboratively with universities and other government and non-governmental agencies on many projects with the following results:
Work continued to conduct science, enhance fish habitats and control the negative impacts of established invasive species. In delivering its results, the department
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Work continued to improve beneficial agriculture management practices with the involvement of the Great Lakes farming community in numerous projects. In delivering its results, the department
Work continued towards the achievement of the sustainable development of Canada’s energy, forestry and mineral metals resources within the Great Lakes Basin. Results included
Delivers national parks programs and the National Marine Conservation Areas Program, and works to develop and maintain a viable protected areas network in the Great Lakes Basin that is relevant to Canadians. Projects included
Work continued to ensure compliance with the Canada Shipping Act, 2001 regulations related to the ecosystem health of the Great Lakes. Transport Canada undertook a wide variety of inspection, monitoring and training programs, and
Work continued toward providing funding to eligible infrastructure projects in support of federal objectives such as a cleaner environment, which includes improved wastewater treatment.
Federal funding has been announced for numerous wastewater projects that directly support the delisting of Areas of Concern as identified by COA and in communities located in and around the Great Lakes watershed. In 2009–2010, a total of $264.6 million in federal funding was announced, through the Building Canada Fund –Major Infrastructure Component and the Green Infrastructure Fund, in support of 9 projects located in communities near the Great Lakes. Of this amount, $173.5 million will go toward the upgrade of 4 sewage treatment plants to help rehabilitate the St. Lawrence River, Hamilton Harbour and the Nipigon Bay Areas of Concern in particular. In 2010–2011, Infrastructure Canada focused on moving all of these projects toward final approvals and negotiating contribution agreements.
Since the launch of the Building Canada Plan in 2007, Infrastructure Canada has committed over $890 million toward more than 575 water and wastewater projects that will improve the ecosystem health of rivers and lakes in the Great Lakes watershed.
Work continued to enhance environmental health knowledge within the Great Lakes Basin that can be integrated into policies to address risks to human health by all levels of government.
Comments on Variances:
Environment Canada: Dedicated Great Lakes funding (GLAPV) is received only by Environment Canada and Fisheries and Oceans Canada, which also each contribute resources from their departmental resource envelope (permanent plus temporary funding) towards achieving results under the COA. All other partners (federal and provincial) to the COA achieve COA results via departmental funding.
Natural Resources Canada: Actual spending in 2010–2011 was slightly less than planned as a result of a minor delay in approval of expenditure authority under the Port Hope Long-term Low-level Radioactive Waste Management Project. The variance explanation in both Canadian Forest Services (CFS) programs (pesticides, and forest harvesting in riparian zones) is that there was less resource envelope money allocated to these programs than requested.
Parks Canada: Figures for planned and actual spending are not available as Parks Canada financial coding systems are not designed to separate out Great Lakes-specific activities.
Health Canada: Health Canada supports work for the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem Initiative through the joint Environment Canada–Health Canada Chemicals Management Plan. Specific resource figures are not available as this spending is not tracked separately in Health Canada's financial system.
Infrastructure Canada: Federal infrastructure funding programs do not include an allocation specific to the COA.
Results achieved by non-federal partners (if applicable):
Contact information:
Linda Robertson
Great Lakes Environment Office
Environment Canada
416-739-5808
Appendix – COA Results Statements
PRIORITY 1 – AREAS OF CONCERN
Result 1.1 – Reduce microbial and other contaminants and excessive nutrients from industrial or municipal wastewater to achieve delisting targets in Nipigon Bay and St. Lawrence River (Cornwall) AOCs.
Result 1.2 – Reduce microbial and other contaminants and excessive nutrients from rural non-point sources to meet delisting criteria in the St. Lawrence River (Cornwall) AOC.
Result 1.3 – Contaminated sediment management strategies developed for the Wheatley Harbour AOC and implemented in the St. Lawrence River (Cornwall) AOC.
Result 1.4 – Plans in place and being implemented to rehabilitate fish and wildlife habitats and populations to meet delisting targets in the Wheatley Harbour and St. Lawrence River (Cornwall) AOCs.
Result 1.5 – Informed, effective collaboration amongst government, communities and individuals to prioritize and complete actions required for delisting and confirming environmental recovery in Nipigon Bay, Jackfish Bay, Wheatley Harbour and St. Lawrence River (Cornwall) AOCs.
Result 1.6 – Environmental monitoring and reporting to document improvements and track environmental recovery.
Result 2.1 – Reduce microbial and other contaminants and excessive nutrients from municipal sewage treatment plants, combined sewer overflows, urban stormwater and industrial wastewater towards delisting targets in St. Marys River, St. Clair River, Detroit River, Niagara River, Hamilton Harbour, Toronto and Region, and Bay of Quinte AOCs.
Result 2.2 – Reduce microbial and other contaminants and excessive nutrients from rural non-point sources towards achieving remedial action plan (RAP) delisting criteria in St. Clair River, Detroit River, Niagara River, Hamilton Harbour, and Toronto and Region AOCs.
Result 2.3 – Progress made in developing sediment management strategies to reduce ecological and human health risk from contaminated sediments in Thunder Bay, Peninsula Harbour, St. Marys River, St. Clair River, Detroit River, Niagara River, Hamilton Harbour, Port Hope and Bay of Quinte AOCs.
Result 2.4 – Long-term management plans being developed and priority actions for delisting being implemented for rehabilitation and protection of fish and wildlife habitats and populations in the St. Marys River, St. Clair River, Detroit River, Niagara River, Hamilton Harbour, Toronto and Region, and Bay of Quinte AOCs.
Result 2.5 – Informed, effective collaboration amongst government, communities and individuals to prioritize and complete actions required for delisting and confirming environmental recovery in AOCs.
Result 2.6 – Identify monitoring needs, undertake required studies and evaluate results to assess environmental recovery and support remediation strategies in AOCs.
PRIORITY 2 - HARMFUL POLLUTANTS
Result 1.1 – Reduction in releases of Tier 1 substances beyond the 2005 achievements towards the goal of virtual elimination.
Result 2.1 – Reduction in releases of criteria air pollutants.
Result 2.2 – Coordinated activities to reduce releases from municipal wastewater.
Result 2.3 – Develop and initiate a program for the sound management of chemical substances in the Great Lakes Basin.
Result 3.1 – Improved understanding of the sources, fate and impacts of harmful pollutants in the Great Lakes Basin.
Result 3.2 – Human health risks from harmful pollutants are understood and addressed in the Great Lakes Basin.
PRIORITY 3 – GREAT LAKES AND GREAT LAKES BASIN SUSTAINABILITY
Result 1.1 – Increased awareness and appreciation of the Great Lakes and their contributions to social, economic and environmental well-being.
Result 1.2 – Increased stewardship actions that work towards a balance between human well-being and prosperity, and healthy aquatic ecosystems.
Result 1.3 - Sustainable use of land, water and other natural resources to provide benefits from the Great Lakes now and in the future.
Result 1.4 – Enhanced knowledge about beneficial and harmful impacts of human activities on Great Lakes aquatic ecosystems and resources.
Result 2.1 – Reduce microbial and other contaminants and excessive nutrients from industrial and municipal wastewater, combined sewer overflows and urban stormwater sources consistent with actions specified in binational Lakewide Management Plans (LaMPs) and binational lake action plans.
Result 2.2 – Reduce microbial and other contaminants and excessive nutrients from rural sources by undertaking actions specified in the binational Lakewide Management Plans and binational lake action plans.
Result 2.3 – Identification of contaminated sediment and development of sediment management plans to reduce the release and impact of sediment-bound contaminants on the Great Lakes Basin ecosystem.
Result 2.4 – Enhanced knowledge about beneficial and harmful impacts of human activities on Great Lakes water quality.
Result 3.1 – Great Lakes aquatic ecosystems and habitats are protected, restored and sustained consistent with binational Great Lakes planning.
Result 3.2 – Progress on rehabilitation of Great Lakes native species to restore the health of aquatic ecosystems, consistent with binational Great Lakes planning.
Result 3.3 – Enhanced knowledge about beneficial and harmful impacts of human activities on Great Lakes aquatic ecosystems, habitats and species.
Result 4.1 – Implementation of the National Action Plan to Address the Threat of Aquatic Invasive Species in the Great Lakes.
Result 4.2 – Enhanced knowledge about the harmful impacts of aquatic invasive species on Great Lakes aquatic ecosystems, food webs and species.
Result 5.1 – The impacts of climate change on the Great Lakes ecosystem composition, structure and function, including biodiversity (organisms and their habitat), water quality and quantity, human health and safety (including access to clean drinking water), social well-being and economic prosperity are understood by governments and the Great Lakes community.
Result 6.1 – The potential risks to Great Lakes drinking water intakes are identified and assessed, and early actions to address risks are undertaken.
Result 6.2 – Develop knowledge and understanding of water quality and quantity issues of concern to the Great Lakes as drinking water sources.
PRIORITY 4 - COORDINATION OF MONITORING, RESEARCH AND INFORMATION
Result 1.1 – Responsive and comprehensive monitoring and research programs.
Result 2.1 – Improved reporting on environmental conditions, changes and progress.
Result 2.2 – Increased sharing of data and information among governments, organizations and basin residents.
Lead Department |
Environment Canada |
---|---|
Lead Department Program Activity | 3.2 - Climate Change and Clean Air |
Federal Theme Partners |
Natural Resources Canada, Transport Canada, Health Canada, Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada, Public Health Agency of Canada, National Research Council Canada, Industry Canada |
Start Date |
April 1, 2007 |
End Date | March 31, 2011 |
Total Federal Funding Allocation | $ 2.57 billion |
Through the Clean Air Agenda (CAA), the Government of Canada has been working towards making tangible improvements in Canada's environment by addressing the challenges of climate change and air pollution. Since 2007, the CAA has been supporting
The 44 programs of the CAA are organized within seven themes: clean air regulatory agenda (CARA), clean energy, clean transportation, indoor air quality, international actions, adaptation, and management and accountability.
The shared outcomes for these programs are:
The Government of Canada remains committed to a reduction of 17 per cent from 2005 levels in Canada's total GHG emissions by the year 2020.
The horizontal management, accountability and reporting framework is led by Environment Canada (EC) and governed by 9 Deputy Ministers, 18 Assistant Deputy Ministers and Chief Financial Officers, seven Director General Theme Leads, and Director General Management Committees for the seven themes of the CAA.
The Clean Air Agenda Results Management Secretariat (CAARMS) supports the CAA governance and EC in facilitating collaboration and overseeing the accountabilities and responsibilities concerning the horizontal management of this Agenda.CAA programming continued to reduce GHGs and air pollutants and address the challenges of climate change and air pollution with a view to building a clean and healthy environment for all Canadians.
CARA advanced the development and implementation of regulatory frameworks to manage air pollution and GHG emissions through significant policy work, analysis, consultation, as well as extensive scientific activities. Over 2010-11, Canada’s work was re-oriented towards the development of sector-by-sector regulations aligned with the United States (U.S.) when appropriate. Key
advances were made in a number of sectors with the publication of the three transportation regulations for new vehicles and engines, and with proposed draft regulations that will limit greenhouse gas emissions from coal-fired electricity generating units. The Automotive Refinishing Regulations and the Architectural Coatings Regulations came into effect in 2010. Once these regulations
are fully implemented they are expected to result in a 40% and a 28% annual reduction of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) emissions respectively from the targeted products categories.
Scientific activities continue to inform the development of critical standards, science assessments, air emissions policies, regulations, agreements and obligations. Also, the Government’s internationally renowned scientists were invited to assume leadership roles in the development of international reports on air pollution and with the World Meteorological
Organization.
On air pollution, the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment agreed to move forward with the finalization of a new collaborative air quality management approach, based on the Comprehensive Air Management System (CAMS) framework which will, when implemented, represent the first systematic national approach to managing air quality.
As a result of Clean Energy programs, Canadians are adopting more energy efficient and renewable energy products and services and benefitting from strengthened infrastructure. This has been achieved through energy efficient retrofits for homes, small buildings and industrial facilities, and through increased use of renewable energy technologies. As of March 31, 2011, 31 projects under ecoENERGY programming for Aboriginal and Northern communities were fully commissioned and are achieving GHG reductions.
Scientific research over 2010-11 generated knowledge essential to achieving Canada’s climate change goals by informing codes, standards and regulations to facilitate the adoption of new technologies. Activities were in the areas of cleaner fossil fuels, cleaner transportation, energy efficiency in residential, commercial and institutional buildings, improved industrial processes, carbon capture and storage and bioenergy.
Overall the results achieved from clean energy activities have ultimately reduced GHG emissions and Criteria Air Contaminants. Collectively, Natural Resources Canada’s programs under the Clean Energy Theme reduced GHG emissions by an estimated 9.3 megatonnes in 2010-11.
Clean Transportation programming continued to address the challenges of pollution and GHG emissions from the movement of people and goods in Canada. Information essential to regulating emissions, and coordinating and harmonizing regulations across different jurisdictions was developed in partnership with vehicle manufacturers, industry associations, government departments and other stakeholders. To support transport sector regulatory initiatives, programming also focussed on changing the behaviour of consumers and industry by tackling two key barriers to reducing pollution from transportation, that is, the lack of information, knowledge and engagement of consumers and industry, and, the costs and risks associated with technology uptake. Memoranda of Understanding with the rail and aviation sectors have reported encouraging results in reducing GHG emission intensity and improving average annual fuel efficiency respectively.
The focus of the last year of the CAA four year mandate for Clean Transportation was to complete projects and program activities, measure their impacts, and gather information about results and case studies to provide to industry and other stakeholders. A number of incentive programs were completed to retire over 70,000 high-polluting vehicles, demonstrate clean freight transportation technology including shore power technology and energy saving technology for passenger cars, light trucks, heavy trucks and rail transportation, provide training on fuel-efficient driving practices and provide municipalities with tools to support transportation demand management in urban areas.
Canada’s participation in United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change meetings and other multilateral and bilateral processes was supported over 2010-11 which enabled Canada’s clean air objectives to be advanced internationally. Public-private partnership clean technology projects delivered environmental benefits (in particular, GHG reductions) and economic benefits to Canadian companies, and accelerated clean technology development and deployment across a range of industrial sectors. Collaboration and knowledge sharing were undertaken with the U.S. by coordinating clean energy technology research and development to reduce GHG emissions. Canada also hosted the annual meeting of the Canada-U.S. Air Quality Committee during which the Committee agreed to a path forward on a Particulate Matter Annex. Canada and the U.S. will also implement a number of activities in 2011-12 to mark the 20th anniversary of the Canada-U.S. Air Quality Agreement.
Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) programming launched a public education campaign to inform Canadians about the health risks that may be present in their homes from radon gas, so that they may better protect their health. To date, 90% of federal buildings in known areas of high radon potential have been measured, which is expected to improve awareness by the public, property managers and governments of the health risks and causes of reduced IAQ, and strategies to improve it. Measurements of both aerial radiation and soil radon gas were made, which will allow researchers to map potential areas of radon and lower the risk of exposure to Canadians. Comprehensive field studies were performed that gathered data on different residential ventilation rates, a wide range of IAQ parameters, and the health of asthmatic Canadians living in these homes. These studies were performed to confirm the relationship between residential IAQ, installed ventilation technologies, and occupants’ health. Protocols were developed to assess the efficacy of methods to improve IAQ. A balanced, multi-stakeholder Canadian Committee on Indoor Air Quality and Buildings is working to raise public awareness of IAQ issues, and provide solutions through targeted best practice information suitable for practitioners, and building and home owners.
Adaptation Theme programming fulfilled or exceeded many of the expected results for 2010-11. These included Aboriginal and northern communities assessing climate change risk information, and developing adaptation plans. The Air Quality Health Index (AQHI) was fully implemented in six provinces replacing the outdated Air Quality Index (AQI), thus increasing awareness and understanding among health professionals. Climate research activities led to the development and operation of global and regional climate models, and the development of a substantial suite of new climate change scenarios based on both Canadian and other climate models to inform adaptation planning and decision-making. Pilot projects related to heat and infectious disease were undertaken to anticipate and address the impacts of climate change on the health of Canadians. Collaboration through six Regional Adaptation Collaboratives and the creation of a national integration group has enhanced communication and joint work on key regional adaptation issues.
The horizontal management of the CAA continued to support the accountability of the federal government to parliamentarians and Canadians for expenditures and activities of the Clean Air Agenda, as well as to support decision-makers in determining the path forward for clean air and climate change programming.
Over 2010-11, programs of the Clean Air Agenda faced key challenges that were similar to the challenges faced in previous years. These were:
Total Funding Approved under the CAA (to March 31, 2011) |
Total Planned Spending |
Total Actual Spending |
2010-11 Actual Spending Reported within Economic Action Plan (EAP) |
---|---|---|---|
$ 2,417,538,077 | $ 867,151,782 | $ 787,851,989 | $ 351,366,517 |
Contact information: Paula Brand, Executive Director, Environment Canada, (819) 997-3729 Paula.Brand@ec.gc.ca
Lead Department |
Environment Canada |
---|---|
Federal Theme Partners |
Transport Canada, Natural Resources Canada, Health Canada |
Federal Partner Name | # Programs for Federal Partners |
Funding Approved |
Planned Spending |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Environment Canada | 8 | $ 273,246,244 | $ 101,371,032 | $ 62,216,068 |
Transport Canada | 1 | $ 19,170,216 | $ 4,769,514 | $ 2,917,011 |
Natural Resources Canada | 2 | $ 35,200,000 | $ 9,566,000 | $ 7,992,054 |
Health Canada | 2 | $ 88,800,000 | $ 27,500,000 | $ 23,642,844 |
Total | 13 | $ 416,416,460 | $ 143,206,546 | $ 96,767,977 |
Theme: Clean Air Regulatory Agenda - 2010-11 Expected Results
In support of the reduction of air emissions, progress was made towards the development and implementation of regulatory frameworks to manage air pollution and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Preparatory work for a North American cap and trade system was completed; however, due to a shift in United States (U.S.) climate policy toward a regulatory approach, Canada’s work was re-oriented toward development of sector-by-sector regulations aligned with the U.S., and analysis (quantitative and qualitative) focuses on sector concerns and key competitiveness issues. Analysis was also undertaken to support Canada's position and views on climate change and related issues at a number of international meetings and venues. This includes, among others, support for the Copenhagen Accord negotiations, the G8 Leaders Summit, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Ministerial Council Meeting, and the Arctic Council Task Force on Short-lived Climate Forcers.
Long-term projections for GHGs and air pollutants were developed to serve as a reference point for analysing the government’s climate change initiatives and Clean Air Agenda as they evolved since early 2010. This included economic analysis for the announced Passenger Automobile and Light Truck Greenhouse Gas Emission Regulations, and for the proposed regulation for coal-fired electricity generation units that is expected to be published in Canada Gazette in 2011 and come into force on July 1, 2015.
Significant policy work and consultations were undertaken to support the development of regulations for the transport and electricity sectors, and to take steps to address emissions from other major industrial sectors. This involved extensive engagement with stakeholders, including provinces and territories, for example through the Federal / Provincial / Territorial Working Group on Domestic Climate change. As a result of this engagement, an Agreement in Principle on efforts to address climate change was signed with British Columbia, and discussions were initiated on an Agreement in Principle with Quebec. Ongoing engagement also took place with the provincial members of the Western Climate Initiative (ON, QC, BC) participating in meetings on the development of the Western Climate Initiative cap and trade system.
Policy work was also undertaken related to Short-Lived Climate Forcers, including black carbon, to support Canada’s engagement in various international fora on this issue, including under the Arctic Council and the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution. The former included the development of a national black carbon emissions inventory.
In October 2010, the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) reviewed a proposal, produced over two years through a multi-stakeholder process, for a Comprehensive Air Management System. Ministers agreed to move forward with a new Air Quality Management System (AQMS) based on this report and asked officials to finalize the key elements of the system in 2011, including Canadian Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) for particulate matter and ozone and associated trigger levels, airsheds and air zones delineation, and base-level industrial emissions requirements for key sectors. Implementation of the system will begin in 2013.
Scientific activities continued to inform the development of critical standards, science assessments, indicators, air emissions policies, regulations, targets/limits, objectives, guidelines, inventories, agreements and obligations. Air quality science informed the finalization of major elements of the new AQMS including the decision-making process leading to the new CAAQs; improved prediction capability; assessed the change in ambient concentrations of smog resulting from biodiesel use in Canada; enhanced the understanding of new particulate matter formation and transformation pathways to help prioritize future regulations; quantified the contribution of mercury emissions from other countries to Canada to support international negotiations; and demonstrated via the Canada-U.S. Air Quality Agreement’s 2010 biennial progress report that both countries have reduced emissions of ground-level ozone precursors and acid rain-causing compounds in line with commitments made under the Agreement.
Also, the Government’s internationally renowned scientists were invited to assume leadership roles in the development of the 2010 Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution Assessment Report and, the World Meteorological Organization’s 2011 Global Assessment of Precipitation Chemistry and Deposition.
In support of a more efficient and cleaner transportation sector, the Government made significant progress through the publication of three new emissions regulations from new vehicles and engines aligned with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards: Marine Spark-Ignition Engine, Vessel and Off-Road Recreational Vehicle Emission Regulations, and Passenger Automobile and Light Truck Greenhouse Gas Emission Regulations. Environment Canada continued to administer its five regulations for vehicles and engines that are currently in effect. Stakeholder consultations on the development of regulations to reduce air emissions from small inshore vessels (e.g. harbour craft, ferries, tugs) and large ships operating in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Seaway System and from ships operating in Canada’s jurisdiction and Canadian ships overseas were carried out. These proposed regulations will implement new International Maritime Organization (IMO) standards for air pollutant emissions from ships, including the North American Emission Control Area. Participation at the IMO continued to advance, global measures to reduce GHG emissions from marine vessels.
Work also took place to monitor the development of the new U.S. labelling regulations for new light-duty vehicles and analysis was undertaken to develop a harmonized approach in Canada.
The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Government of Canada and the Railway Association of Canada expired December 31, 2010. Through the MOU, the industry has decreased its GHG emission intensity by 23.3% in 2008 compared with the 1990 baseline. The Government of Canada and the Railway Association of Canada are continuing to collaborate in advancing industry efforts to reduce emissions and in reporting on results achieved under the MOU. The 2009 Locomotive Emissions Monitoring Report will be released in 2011.
In support of safer and energy efficient consumer products, the manufacturing, import prohibitions associated with the Automotive Refinishing Regulations and the Architectural Coatings Regulations came into effect in 2010. The sales prohibitions came into effect in 2010 for the Automotive Refinishing Regulations and will begin in 2012 for the Architectural Coatings Regulations. Once these regulations are fully implemented they are expected to result in a 40% and 28% annual reduction of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) emissions respectively from the targeted product categories.
Analysis and consultations were completed to support the publication of amendments to the Energy Efficiency Regulations in the fall of 2011, and all CARA efficiency regulations are estimated to be in effect by June 2012. Also, market transformation program impacts (ENERGY STAR) are expected to be met as awareness of the program by the public and its use by participants remains high.
In support of improving air quality in Canadian households and buildings, 9,000 participants were recruited for the cross-Canada 2011-12 radon survey. The Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) program increased both the scientific understanding and the public awareness of the health risks of indoor air pollutants through risk assessments, research and public outreach. A Geographic Information System-based procedure for the mapping of indoor radon potential has been used to create a radon potential map of southern Ontario. Scientific assessments were completed for three priority indoor air contaminants and a proposed Residential Indoor Air Quality Guideline for Toluene was published.
A multi-city and multi-year project to assess the IAQ in Canadian homes and to identify the major sources of contaminants was completed. While analysis is still on-going for certain cities, results from these projects have already been used in risk assessments and have been made available through scientific journals, presentations at conferences and in technical reports.
This year also saw significant public outreach, as indoor air quality, including radon, was included as a major focus for First Nations public awareness campaigns. In combination with the targeted radon outreach program, there has been an increase in radon awareness exceeding the target of 25% and a significant increase in the distribution of radon outreach materials.
In support of more accurate reporting, as well as easier compliance on air emissions, the National Inventory Report for GHGs to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change was submitted and was also used to support domestic decisions and actions on climate change policy; Canada’s 2009 air pollutant emissions inventory data and historical trends were published; and, the 2009 GHG emissions information from large industrial and institutional facilities under its Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting Program (GHGRP) was collected and published. The GHGRP collected the emissions data through the department's newly launched Single Window Reporting (SWR) system, which was facilitated through bilateral agreements with provinces. Furthermore, the expanded version of the SWR system for the Greenhouse Gas and the and National Pollutant Release Inventory reporting was publicly launched in the Spring.
A request for proposals, based on the Offset System rules, for offsetting GHG emissions resulting from federal participation in the Vancouver Winter Games and the G8/G20 Summits was developed. Much of the design of a domestic credit tracking system was completed, but it has yet to be implemented.
Work was completed on bringing Canada’s Kyoto Protocol National Registry into compliance with international data exchange standards.
The key challenges facing Canada in establishing a broad approach to climate change is the need to remain flexible enough to respond to changing priorities, and keeping pace with international and U.S. policy and regulatory developments. Despite significant shifts in U.S. climate policy, from a cap and trade to a regulatory approach, preparatory work for either approach was successfully undertaken. The Federal-Provincial-Territorial Working Group on Domestic Climate Change provided a useful forum to work with provinces and territories in developing federal policy, and will be a useful venue for consultation going forward.
Canada experienced a number of challenges with respect to managing the coordination and communication amongst a number of key players in many of its Clean Air Regulatory Agenda activities. The main challenges experienced during the reporting period included the need to:
There remain some challenges in moving forward with the Comprehensive Air Management System, such as concerns about potential for administrative burden in implementation, competitiveness impacts on the industry, development of emission limits and validation for all key sectors.
A lengthy consultation process to inform the development of the new U.S. GHG label for light-duty vehicles caused delays in Canada's plan to move forward with a harmonized voluntary label in 2010-11. The U.S. finalized its new label in May 2011, paving the way for Canada to proceed with updates to its label that align with upgrades introduced in the U.S.
Federal Partner Programs | Funding Approved under CAA | Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
---|---|---|---|
Environment Canada | |||
Industrial Sector Regulatory Actions | $ 85,924,181 | $ 32,046,428 | $ 21,632,154 |
Transport Sector Regulatory Actions | $ 31,474,967 | $ 11,847,484 | $ 6,893,031 |
Consumer and Commercial Products Regulatory Actions | $ 12,000,000 | $ 3,363,020 | $ 2,050,763 |
Science in Support of Regulatory Activities and Accountability | $ 47,985,868 | $ 17,803,315 | $ 14,666,748 |
Emissions Reporting | $ 54,573,952 | $ 20,473,744 | $ 11,623,762 |
Emissions Trading | $ 24,901,559 | $ 11,402,242 | $ 3,368,622 |
Enforcement Advice and Reporting on Progress | $ 7,000,000 | $ 1,741,960 | $ 630,680 |
Policy Development, Analysis and Coordination | $ 9,385,717 | $ 2,692,839 | $ 1,350,308 |
Subtotal | $ 273,246,244 | $ 101,371,032 | $ 62,216,068 |
Transport Canada | |||
Transport Sector Regulatory Actions | $ 19,170,216 | $ 4,769,514 | $ 2,917,011 |
Subtotal | $ 19,170,216 | $ 4,769,514 | $ 2,917,011 |
Natural Resources Canada | |||
Transport Sector Regulatory Actions | $ 3,200,000 | $ 400,000 | $ 332,872 |
Consumer and Commercial Products Regulatory Actions | $ 32,000,000 | $ 9,166,000 | $ 7,659,182 |
Subtotal | $ 35,200,000 | $ 9,566,000 | $ 7,992,054 |
Health Canada | |||
Indoor Air Quality Management Actions | $ 17,500,000 | $ 4,500,000 | $ 3,584,996 |
Science in Support of Regulatory Activities and Accountability | $ 71,300,000 | $ 23,000,000 | $ 20,057,848 |
Subtotal | $ 88,800,000 | $ 27,500,000 | $ 23,642,844 |
Total Theme | $ 416,416,460 | $ 143,206,546 | $ 96,767,977 |
Lead Department |
Natural Resources Canada |
---|---|
Federal Theme Partners |
Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada |
Federal Partner Name | # Programs for Federal Partners | Funding Approved under CAA (to March 31, 2011) |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Natural Resources Canada | 7 | $ 1,336,242,000 | $ 590,127,394 | $ 573,290,098 |
Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada | 1 | $ 15,000,000 | $ 3,750,000 | $ 3,726,082 |
Total | 8 | $ 1,351,242,000 | $ 593,877,394 | $ 577,016,180 |
Theme: Clean Energy - 2010-11 Expected Results
Natural Resources Canada
Programs under the Clean Energy Theme continued to surpass expectations and achieve concrete benefits for Canadians in 2010-11. These benefits include increased energy efficiency, renewable energy production and facilitation of emerging technologies. Tangible reductions of Greenhouse Gases (GHG) and Criteria Air Contaminants (CAC) have also been realized from clean energy activities.
As a result of Clean Energy programs, Canadians are adopting energy efficient products and services.
During the four-year program period ending March 31, 2011, the ecoENERGY Retrofit program received over 510,000 grant applications against a program target of supporting 520,000 grants for energy efficient retrofits for homes. In addition, in the 2010-11 fiscal year, 483 contribution agreements for small and medium organizations were signed, providing financial support to retrofit smaller buildings and industrial facilities.
ecoENERGY for Buildings and Houses enabled consumer choice in energy efficient housing by administering the labelling of approximately 15,900 new houses and issuing approximately 369,000 labels for existing houses according to their energy performance. These results exceeded the expected achievements for 2010-11 (10,000 new and 125,000 existing houses). Over the 4-year program period, almost 350 commercial buildings received energy labels as part of a pilot energy management labelling and benchmarking program, and approximately 1,600 building owners, managers, operators, designers and builders received energy management training. As well, the National Energy Code for Buildings 2011 code was updated and formally approved by the Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes.
Industry managers have also been engaged on energy efficiency: In 2010-11, approximately 1,000 industrial energy managers were trained under the ecoENERGY for Industry program. Furthermore, 208 new companies registered their commitment to improved energy efficiency and became Canadian Industry Program for Energy Conservation leaders. In addition, 9 energy assessments to identify
opportunities for energy efficiency in companies were funded.
As a result of Clean Energy programs, Canadians are adopting renewable energy products and services and benefitting from strengthened infrastructure.
In 2010-11, 39 projects were commissioned (i.e., in operation) and eligible to receive the production incentive under ecoENERGY for Renewable Power. This represents 1,504 megawatts (MW) of renewable power capacity and commitments of $453 million over 10 years, meeting the 2010-11 target of 1,500 MW. Over the 4-year period ending March 31, 2011, 104 renewable power projects have signed
contribution agreements, representing almost 4500 MW of capacity and federal commitments of about $1.4 billion over 14 years.
ecoENERGY for Renewable Heat increased the use of renewable thermal energy technologies in Canada in 2010-11.Under the Residential Pilot Incentive, 9 contribution agreements with collaborators to run residential solar water programs were active and 591 solar water heating systems were installed in residential systems under these agreements, providing $560,000 in funding. In total over the
life of the program, 14 contribution agreements were signed, surpassing the program target to support at least 8 residential pilot projects, and a total of 1154 residential solar water systems were installed. As well, 523 commercial systems were installed in 2010-11, providing $8.9 million in funding and leading to a total of 1268 commercial systems over the life of the program and surpassing
the program target of 700 systems.
As a result of Clean Energy programs, research has been supported that will generate knowledge essential to achieving Canada’s climate change goals.
Under the ecoENERGY Technology Initiative, scientific research in the 2010-11 fiscal year has been used to inform codes, standards and regulations facilitating the adoption of new technology. Activities were in the areas of cleaner fossil fuels, cleaner transportation, energy efficiency in residential, commercial and institutional buildings, improved industrial processes, carbon capture
and storage, and bioenergy. For instance, the program supported the provision of on-going information and expert advice to Environment Canada on energy policy and technology to develop regulations under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act to limit greenhouse gas emissions from coal-fired electricity generation. Another example is the Biomass Inventory and Mapping Analysis Tool,
which was further developed and improved, and continues to be used by a wide variety of stakeholders to aid in decision-making. Modelling and simulation capabilities are a third example – these were used to develop five case studies on the integration of distributed generation that will have a significant impact on how renewable energies will be integrated onto the electricity
grid.
The Policy, Communications, Monitoring and Reporting program supported Natural Resources Canada's (NRCan) 2010-11 clean energy achievements with timely and strategic advice provided to senior management on clean energy, environment and forest carbon issues. The program also led accurate reporting on NRCan’s Clean Energy activities through the CAA and other government reports,
and contributed to the development of NRCan’s next suite of clean energy programs in Budget 2011. It provided forest-carbon related information for reporting in Canada's 2011 National Inventory Report to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Furthermore in 2010-11, the program increased awareness and understanding among stakeholders of the potential for,
and methods of, reducing GHGs and CACs with responses to 95 media calls related to the ecoENERGY initiatives, organization of 124 announcements related to clean energy programming, and the production of marketing and outreach material to support the ecoENERGY initiatives.
Finally, the results achieved under the Clean Energy Theme have ultimately reduced emissions of GHGs and CACs from clean energy activities. Collectively, Natural Resources Canada’s programs under the Clean Energy Theme reduced GHG emissions by an estimated 9.3 megatonnes (Mt) in 2010-11.
Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada
In 2010-11, the ecoENERGY for Aboriginal and Northern Communities Program funded 47 projects in 42 communities, totalling $2.5 million. The program was fully subscribed by November 2010. The funded projects can be broken down as follows:
The program has achieved its goal to support projects within Aboriginal and northern communities which will result in an estimated 1.3 Mt GHG reduction over a 20-year period once projects have been commissioned. As of March 31, 2011, a total of 31 projects have been fully commissioned and are currently achieving GHG reductions.
Natural Resources Canada
Risks, challenges and lessons learned through programs promoting energy efficiency in buildings, houses and industrial sectors:
Risks, challenges and lessons learned through programs encouraging the deployment of renewable energy technologies:
Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada
Risks, challenges and lessons learned through the ecoENERGY for Aboriginal and Northern Communities program:
Federal Partner Programs | Funding Approved under CAA | Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
---|---|---|---|
Natural Resources Canada | |||
ecoEnergy for Buildings and Houses | $ 61,000,000 | $ 13,608,000 | $ 13,532,259 |
ecoEnergy Retrofit | $ 801,000,000 | $ 385,999,100 | $ 382,885,119 |
ecoEnergy for Industry | $ 18,000,000 | $ 3,616,000 | $ 3,481,757 |
ecoEnergy for Renewable Power | $ 228,000,000 | $ 90,660,000 | $ 90,152,716 |
ecoEnergy for Renewable Heat | $ 34,430,000 | $ 11,480,000 | $ 11,468,619 |
ecoEnergy Technology Initiative | $ 169,252,000 | $ 78,624,294 | $ 66,411,774 |
Policy, Communications, Monitoring and Reporting | $ 24,560,000 | $ 6,140,000 | $ 5,357,854 |
Subtotal | $ 1,336,242,000 | $ 590,127,394 | $ 573,290,098 |
Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada | |||
ecoEnergy for Aboriginal and Northern Communities | $ 15,000,000 | $ 3,750,000 | $ 3,726,082 |
Subtotal | $ 15,000,000 | $ 3,750,000 | $ 3,726,082 |
Total Theme | $ 1,351,242,000 | $ 593,877,394 | $ 577,016,180 |
2010-2011 Theme Actual Spending within Economic Action Plan |
---|
$ 351,366,517 |
Lead Department |
Transport Canada |
---|---|
Federal Theme Partners | Natural Resources Canada, Environment Canada, Human Resources and Skills Development Canada |
Federal Partner Name | # Programs for Federal Partners | Funding Approved under CAA (to March 31, 2011) |
Planned Spending 2010-11 | Actual Spending 2010-11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Transport Canada | 9 | $ 315,300,000 | $ 16,603,011 | $ 12,155,856 |
Natural Resources Canada | 2 | $ 43,000,000 | $ 9,760,000 | $ 9,476,059 |
Environment Canada | 1 | $ 90,800,000 | $ 41,388,000 | $ 30,247,496 |
Human Resources and Skills Development Canada | 1 | $ 11,300,000 | $ 0 | $ 0 |
Total | 13 | $ 460,400,000 | $ 67,751,011 | $ 51,879,411 |
Theme: Clean Transportation - 2010-11 Expected Results
During their fourth and final year of operation, Clean Transportation programs continued to address the challenges of pollution and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the movement of people and goods in Canada.
Programs provided information essential to the development of informed regulations and to the coordination and harmonization of regulations across different jurisdictions. Programs also supplemented regulations and helped to ensure their success by tackling two key barriers to reducing pollution from transportation: the lack of information, knowledge and engagement on the part of consumers and industry, and the costs and risks associated with uptake of new technologies. In 2010-11, the focus was on completing the projects and program activities, measuring their impact, and gathering information about results and making this available to industry and other stakeholders.
To help inform the regulatory process, the ecoTechnology for Vehicles program worked in partnership with vehicle manufacturers, industry associations, government departments and other stakeholders to test and evaluate emerging vehicle technologies in accordance with the test procedures developed by standard testing bodies and important regulatory agencies like the Society of Automotive Engineers.
Under the National Harmonization Initiative for the Trucking Industry two studies were commissioned examining the performance and potential safety implications of emerging add-on aerodynamic devices in the trucking industry. This includes the “Truck Trailer Side Skirts” study, which reports on commercially available designs, their construction materials and mounting methods; cost; whether there are any side effects on vehicle safety such as on brake cooling; and their ability to provide side underrun protection to vulnerable road users such as cyclists.
Addressing the lack of information and improving knowledge is essential to change the behaviour of consumers and industry. A number of programs addressed this objective.
The ecoENERGY for Personal Vehicles program contributed to reduced emissions from personal vehicles by providing training on fuel-efficient driving practices to approximately 580,000 new drivers. Additionally, fuel efficient driving instruction was delivered to 10,500 experienced drivers. As a result of activities undertaken by the ecoENERGY for Personal Vehicles program since its launch in 2007, Canadians have reduced their annual GHG emissions by 0.21 megatonnes (Mt). Additionally, a Memorandum of Understanding signed in 2005 with Automobile Manufacturers achieved a GHG reduction of between 3.1 Mt and 3.4 Mt.
The ecoENERGY for Fleets program contributed to reduced emissions from trucking by providing training in fuel-efficient driving practices to over 8000 drivers. To elicit the engagement of stakeholders, the ecoENERGY for Fleets program concluded agreements with the trucking industry under which over 500 tractors and trailers were retrofitted with fuel-efficient components.
Under the ecoFREIGHT Partnership program, Memoranda of Understanding continued to be implemented with the aviation and rail industries. In the aviation industry, annual average fuel efficiency improvements between 1990 and 2009 were 1.9%, surpassing the Memorandum of Understanding-established target of 1.1%. The rail industry GHG emission intensity similarly decreased by 23.3% by 2008 compared with the 1990 baseline. Finally, under the Freight Technology Demonstration Fund and the Freight Technology Incentive Program, over 30 different information sharing products were developed including webinars, technology case studies, and success stories. These products are available on the programs' web site to inform stakeholders on the benefits of green freight technologies. In addition one newsletter was developed and directly distributed to over 800 freight industry stakeholders to further stimulate technology adoption.
Under the Vehicle Scrappage program incentives were provided to eligible recipients that led to the retirement of over 70,000 old, high-polluting vehicles.
The costs and risks associated with new technologies are important barriers to capital turnover, particularly during a period of economic recession. In 2010-11, a number of Clean Transportation programs continued to be implemented in order to assist in reducing such risks. The Freight Technology Demonstration and Freight Technology Incentives programs completed their sponsorship of 40 projects with $25 million in value covering a wide range of best practices and technology applications such as aerodynamics, electrification, engine innovation and best operating practices. The Marine Shore Power program completed its second tranche of funding with the provision of $645,000 to the Prince Rupert Port Authority to demonstrate shore power technology for container ships at Fairview Terminal. The ecoMobility program continued to provide funding to 13 projects in 12 communities across Canada and developed several information and social marketing tools needed to support Transportation Demand Management project implementation across Canada.
Finally, international harmonization and cooperation is essential to emissions reduction. Transport Canada continued its presence at international fora under the ecoFREIGHT Partnerships programs, contributing to the development of international environmental standards, practices, and guidelines, and sharing of information and best practices within organizations such as the International Civil Aviation organization, the International Maritime Organization, and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, among others.Federal Partner Programs | Funding Approved under CAA | Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
---|---|---|---|
Transport Canada | |||
ecoMobility | $ 8,200,000 | $ 2,814,000 | $ 2,321,320 |
ecoTechnology for Vehicles | $ 14,100,000 | $ 2,693,000 | $ 2,569,757 |
National Harmonization Initiative for the Trucking Industry | $ 5,400,000 | $ 1,855,000 | $ 840,560 |
Freight Technology Demonstration Fund | $ 9,300,000 | $ 2,339,655 | $ 1,996,141 |
Freight Technology Incentives Program | $ 9,350,000 | $ 2,609,856 | $ 1,596,093 |
ecoFreight Partnerships | $ 6,550,000 | $ 1,452,000 | $ 967,885 |
Marine Shore Power Program | $ 5,700,000 | $ 1,841,500 | $ 1,054,144 |
Analytical and Policy Support | $ 4,000,000 | $ 998,000 | $ 809,956 |
ecoAUTO Rebate Program | $ 252,700,000 | $ 0 | $ 0 |
Subtotal | $ 315,300,000 | $ 16,603,011 | $ 12,155,856 |
Natural Resources Canada | |||
ecoENERGY or Personal Vehicles | $ 21,000,000 | $ 4,632,275 | $ 4,665,288 |
ecoENERGY for Fleets | $ 22,000,000 | $ 5,127,725 | $ 4,810,771 |
Subtotal | $ 43,000,000 | $ 9,760,000 | $ 9,476,059 |
Environment Canada | |||
Vehicle Scrappage Program | $ 90,800,000 | $ 41,388,000 | $ 30,247,496 |
Subtotal | $ 90,800,000 | $ 41,388,000 | $ 30,247,496 |
Human Resources and Skills Development Canada | |||
ecoAUTO Rebate Program | $ 11,300,000 | $ 0 | $ 0 |
Subtotal | $ 11,300,000 | $ 0 | $ 0 |
Total Theme | $ 460,400,000 | $ 67,751,011 | $ 51,879,411 |
Lead Department |
Health Canada |
---|---|
Federal Theme Partners | National Research Council Canada |
Federal Partner Name | # Programs for Federal Partners |
Funding Approved under CAA (to March 31, 2011) |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Health Canada | 1 | $ 15,000,000 | $ 4,100,000 | $ 3,819,144 |
National Research Council Canada | 1 | $ 8,000,000 | $ 2,000,000 | $ 1,998,495 |
Total | 2 | $ 23,000,000 | $ 6,100,000 | $ 5,817,639 |
Theme: Indoor Air Quality - 2010-11 Expected Results
Radon Strategy
A radon educational toolkit was completed and distributed to stakeholders, and a resource kit for health professionals was completed and mailed to family doctors, oncologists, respirologists and other healthcare providers across Canada. The purpose of these kits is to provide stakeholders with a variety of information which can be used to develop regional or community-focused outreach programs and activities. In addition, a radon fact sheet for smokers was developed and will be distributed in 2011-12.
In an effort to reduce environmental health risks, Health Canada launched the Hazard Check guide and public education campaign in March 2010, which included radon as one of the key risks targeted by increased awareness efforts.
Aerial radiation surveys were performed in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba to assess the levels of uranium and other naturally-occurring radioactivity. At least 35% of Canada’s geographic area is now available for use in radon potential maps. Soil gas radon measurements were made in three major population centres in Ontario (Kingston and the Greater Toronto Area) and Quebec
(Montreal) for use in the mapping of radon potential.
Approximately 6,000 federal buildings were tested for radon in 2010-11, which exceeded the target of 5,000. The total number of federal buildings now tested over the four years of the project is approximately 9,000 or ~ 90% of federal buildings in known areas of high radon potential.
Health Canada and the National Environmental Health Association Radon Proficiency Program have developed Canadian-specific certification exams in both official languages, as well as a training curriculum which addresses radon within the Canadian context.
Indoor Air Research and Development Initiative
A field study on ventilation, Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) and respiratory health has been performed and is 92% complete. With valuable input from the Indoor Air Research Laboratory, all interventions (introducing HRV, heat recovery ventilator, and ERV, energy recovery ventilator, systems) have been completed to improve ventilation. The Institut national de santé publique du Québec and the National Research Council Canada (NRC) have created databases for chemical, biological, physical, environmental, behavioural and medical results obtained from the field study, which will be analyzed to determine the relationships between ventilation scenarios and technologies, IAQ and health.
The following three IAQ solutions and technologies have been prioritized out of 50 potential candidate solutions: portable air cleaners, HRV and commercial air duct cleaning. Three evaluation protocols regarding these technologies have been developed under the guidance of a multi-stakeholder Technical Advisory Committee, and the performance of these solutions has been evaluated.
The Canadian Committee on Indoor Air Quality in Buildings met regularly, and an Executive Committee was established to guide this committee. The work of the committee has led to a survey on ‘Building Managers’ Knowledge of IA and Improvement Strategies’, as well as to a guidance document on ‘Sampling Strategies and Protocols for Organic Compounds in Buildings’.It is unlikely that all federal buildings (~20,000) will have been tested by the funding completion date (end of 2012-13) for federal building testing. To further engage federal departments and organizations, Health Canda has provided information on the requirements under the Canadian Occupational Health and Safety Regulations to federal departments. In cases where departments have a large building stock and have developed a multi-year testing plan, provisions have been made for continued radon detector support beyond 2012-13, in order to ensure that the maximum number of buildings is completed.
Field studies with human subjects, especially from parts of vulnerable populations, are difficult to perform and often take more time than planned. There is a risk of participants dropping out and the study not having sufficient population to be statistically meaningful. To mitigate this risk and ensure timely completion, NRC continuously recruited participants and ensured participants met inclusion criteria.
Involvement of stakeholder committee provides valuable input, but consensus-based decisions require much time and many revisions of the projected deliverables. To ensure timely outputs, stakeholders were engaged by NRC and were provided with clear objectives and timelines.Federal Partner Programs | Funding Approved under CAA | Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
---|---|---|---|
Health Canada | |||
Radon Strategy | $ 15,000,000 | $ 4,100,000 | $ 3,819,144 |
Subtotal | $ 15,000,000 | $ 4,100,000 | $ 3,819,144 |
National Research Council Canada | |||
Indoor Air Research and Development Initiative | $ 8,000,000 | $ 2,000,000 | $ 1,998,495 |
Subtotal | $ 8,000,000 | $ 2,000,000 | $ 1,998,495 |
Total Theme | $ 23,000,000 | $ 6,100,000 | $ 5,817,639 |
Lead Department |
Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada |
---|---|
Federal Theme Partners |
Natural Resources Canada, Health Canada, Environment Canada, Public Health Agency of Canada |
Federal Partner Name | # Programs for Federal Partners | Funding Approved under CAA (to March 31, 2011) |
Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada | 1 | $ 14,000,000 | $ 6,050,000 | $ 5,978,661 |
Natural Resources Canada | 1 | $ 23,655,000 | $ 10,564,323 | $ 9,881,683 |
Health Canada | 3 | $ 23,600,000 | $ 7,100,000 | $ 6,757,117 |
Environment Canada | 2 | $ 36,300,000 | $ 10,418,627 | $ 9,904,657 |
Public Health Agency of Canada | 1 | $ 6,750,000 | $ 2,544,210 | $ 2,728,000 |
Total | 8 | $ 104,305,000 | $ 36,677,160 | $ 35,250,118 |
Theme: Adaptation - 2010-11 Expected Results
The Adaptation Theme has met or exceeded many of its expectations for 2010-11.
Working directly with partners at the community, regional and national level, the theme was able to increase capacity to conduct science and encourage greater collaboration. Fifty-two Aboriginal and northern communities, traditional territories, settlement areas and Territorial governments and First Nations South of 60° were funded to complete 36 projects looking at climate change impacts and adaptation in Aboriginal and northern communities. Of the 36 projects, 16 focused on assessing climate risks and building adaptive capacity, 10 involved sharing climate change risk information to strengthen local decision making and adaptation planning, and 10 involved the development and use of adaptation plans. An additional 16 projects were funded to address the health impacts of climate change in the North. The projects focused on increasing understanding and developing adaptation options for community-based ice monitoring, surveillance and communication networks, land, water and ice safety, drinking water and food security and safety, and traditional medicine. Each year the number of projects funded and conducted has increased and many have included youth and Elders working together to gain knowledge.
Bilateral meetings were held with each territory to develop a framework on federal/territorial collaborations around climate change adaptation within territorial boundaries. Preliminary discussions are expected to begin to decide which projects will be included in this framework to deliver on territorial priorities. A PanArctic Results Workshop was also held in February 2011 and brought all communities funded to assess and plan for climate change and health impacts in the North together to showcase their results and share their knowledge and experiences with other communities, Aboriginal leaders and organizations, government, academia and Members of Parliament.
Communities were also supported in better understanding the health impacts of climate change through pilot processes and the dissemination of information products. Four community-based, pilot, heat alert and response systems were completed. Table top exercises were held in all four communities to assist public health practitioners and emergency planners in developing their systems (http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/climat/adapt_bulletin-adapt3/index-eng.php). Broad dissemination to medical officers of health and public health and emergency management officials is planned for: “Heat Alert and Response Systems to Protect Health: Best Practices Guidebook” (Fall 2011); “Extreme Heat Events Guidelines: Technical Guide for Health Care Workers” and associated fact sheets (http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/climat/index-eng.php) (Summer 2011); and, “Communicating the Health Risks of Extreme Heat Events: Toolkit for Public Health and Emergency Management Officials” and associated heat-health brochures (http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/climat/heat-chaleur/index-eng.php) (Spring 2011). A series of workshops was also completed to support efforts to link urban planning with heat adaptation and mitigation.
Focusing on infectious disease, four geographically distinct pilot sites across Canada (Saint John, NB; Niagara, ON; Canmore-Cochrane, AB; Comox Valley Regional District, BC) addressed the health impacts of climate change in their regions. In addition, five universities (McGill University, Université de Montréal, University of Saskatchewan, University of Victoria, and York University) were solicited to conduct targeted research in vector-borne or water-borne infectious disease. Studies included: modelling West Nile virus transmission to predict and map future risk; development of multi-criteria decision analysis tools to assess and proactively manage vector-borne zoonosis (e.g. WNv and Lyme) risk at the community level; study of climate variables (precipitation, temperature) and landscape as predictors of mosquito vector populations to create the real time warning system for West Nile virus; and identification of the relationships between climate and existing and new water-borne pathogens and predicting future risk with a changing climate.
Partnerships have been established across Canada to enhance decision-making on adaptation issues. Six Regional Adaptation Collaboratives (RAC), covering all regions of Canada, have attracted 120 partners from municipalities, NGOs, Aboriginal organizations, academia and the private sector as well as 40 provincial and territorial agencies and departments, enhancing communication and joint work on 17 key regional adaptation issues. Collaboration is also taking place nationally through the creation of an integration group which allows RAC leaders to share experiences and expertise. An unplanned outcome from this activity has been an increase in adaptation-related activities both inside and outside of governments. Information has been disseminated and training delivered to further benefit adaptation planning. Four decision-support tools, 3 infrastructure case studies, and 23 reports were released increasing the availability of tools and information for use in planning adaptation. Engineers Canada delivered 6 workshops on the infrastructure risk assessment protocol bringing the number of people trained in its use to 345. The planners delivered two training workshops and are already noting an increase in application of climate change information in planners’ work.
There has also been progress in increasing the availability of adaptation and air quality information through the wider use of the Air Quality Health Index (AQHI) and development and dissemination of climate change scenarios. By March 31, 2011, the AQHI was fully implemented across Canada in six provinces (NFLD, PEI, NS, MN, SK and BC) where the older, out of date provincial Air Quality Index (AQI) was dropped in favour of the AQHI. Successful negotiations with New Brunswick have led to the decision to move forward with province-wide implementation for Spring 2012. Alberta is planning to begin a phased approach towards full province-wide implementation beginning in June 2011. Quebec has completed its pilot of the AQHI in three locations and is evaluating next steps towards implementation. To date, the AQHI is available to approximately 17.5 million Canadians in 49 locations across Canada. Promotion of the AQHI has been extensive through a number of partners including: the Weather Network, the University of British Columbia, the Asthma Society, provincial Lung Associations and the College of Family Physicians of Canada. As of March 2011, 392 participants had enrolled and 160 participants had completed an e-learning course to raise awareness and understanding of the AQHI among health professionals. To view the public on-line website of the AQHI, please see www.airhealth.ca.
The development and dissemination of climate change projections and scenarios has strengthened the ability of all partners to conduct adaptation science. New climate change simulations and projections for Canada and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report, to be released in 2014, continued to be in production using the internationally competitive Canadian global climate model. A new regional climate model used to downscale global climate change projections was developed, with testing and evaluation underway. Global and regional climate model output continued to be disseminated to users via the Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis (CCCma) data server and research results were widely disseminated via the CCCma website (http://www.cccma.ec.gc.ca/) and through peer-reviewed publications. A substantial suite of new climate change scenarios were also developed based on both Canadian and other climate models that are being delivered via the Canadian Climate Change Scenarios Network (http://cccsn.ca/) website. Further, legally required climatic design information has been updated in cooperation with the Canadian Standards Association for the development of new codes and standards for Canadian infrastructure.Interest in Adaptation Theme programs has increased significantly over the three years of funding. Some funding programs were oversubscribed in the final year, and delivery of the funding in a timely and consistent manner has been challenging. Multi-year funding would provide long-term stability for proponents and allow projects to start earlier in the fiscal year. Ensuring ongoing support and implementation of partnerships and pilot studies was also a challenge. Programs provided support through departmental sharing of expertise and information with pilot communities and stakeholders, which enhanced the impact of projects. Local ownership and the development of sustainability plans were promoted to encourage continuation of programs. Early engagement was found to be key and a commitment to improving outreach and knowledge transfer is an ongoing need as communities and partners deal with competing priorities. Programs strived to be flexible to accommodate regional needs and variabilities, while maintaining national consistency.
Federal Partner Programs | Funding Approved under CAA | Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
---|---|---|---|
Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada | |||
Assist Northerners in Assessing Key Vulnerabilities and Opportunities | $ 14,000,000 | $ 6,050,000 | $ 5,978,661 |
Subtotal | $ 14,000,000 | $ 6,050,000 | $ 5,978,661 |
Natural Resources Canada | |||
Innovative Risk Management Tools / Regional Adaptation Action Partnerships | $ 23,655,000 | $10,564,323 | $ 9,881,683 |
Subtotal | $ 23,655,000 | $ 10,564,323 | $ 9,881,683 |
Health Canada | |||
National Air Quality Health Index and Air Quality Forecast Program | $ 8,700,000 | $ 2,200,000 | $ 1,635,999 |
Climate Change and Health Adaptation in Northern/Inuit Communities | $ 7,000,000 | $ 2,150,000 | $ 2,162,693 |
Climate and Infectious Disease Alert and Response System to Protect the Health of Canadians | $ 7,900,000 | $ 2,750,000 | $ 2,958,425 |
Subtotal | $ 23,600,000 | $ 7,100,000 | $ 6,757,117 |
Environment Canada | |||
National Air Quality Health Index and Air Quality Forecast Program | $ 21,300,000 | $ 5,800,000 | $ 5,750,940 |
Improved Climate Change Scenarios | $ 15,000,000 | $ 4,618,627 | $ 4,153,717 |
Subtotal | $ 36,300,000 | $ 10,418,627 | $ 9,904,657 |
Public Health Agency of Canada | |||
Climate and Infectious Disease Alert and Response System to Protect the Health of Canadians | $ 6,750,000 | $ 2,544,210 | $ 2,728,000 |
Subtotal | $ 6,750,000 | $ 2,544,210 | $ 2,728,000 |
Total Theme | $ 104,305,000 | $ 36,677,160 | $ 35,250,118 |
Lead Department |
Environment Canada |
---|---|
Federal Theme Partners |
Natural Resources Canada, Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, Industry Canada |
Federal Partner Name | # Programs for Federal Partners | Funding Approved under CAA (to March 31, 2011) |
Planned Spending 2010-11 | Actual Spending 2010-11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Environment Canada | 5 | $ 39,831,067 | $ 13,418,671 | $ 15,393,666 |
Natural Resources Canada | 3 | $ 7,838,650 | $ 2,304,000 | $ 2,154,707 |
Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade | 3 | $ 9,264,900 | $ 2,527,000 | $ 2,405,648 |
Industry Canada | 1 | $ 240,000 | $ 40,000 | $ 22,665 |
Total | 12 | $ 57,174,617 | $ 18,289,671 | $ 19,976,686 |
Theme: International Actions - 2010-11 Expected Results
Canada has met all current financial and other obligations under international climate change treaties and agreements; dues were paid to United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC); and Canada complied with all reporting requirements. Environment Canada (EC), Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) and, Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) constructively engaged in five UNFCCC negotiating meetings to advance Canada’s objectives and advocated Canada’s objectives at other multilateral processes such as the G8, G20, Major Economies Forum, la Francophonie, Clean Energy Ministerial and Arctic Council. Environment Canada strengthened bilateral policy and project-based cooperation with key countries (in particular, China and Mexico), and engaged with key domestic constituencies (Provinces/Territories, national Aboriginal organizations and civil society) regarding Canada’s UN negotiation objectives and positions. In December 2010, Canada adopted the UNFCCC’s Cancun Agreements, which meets Canada’s objectives for a comprehensive range of issues.
In this final of four years, EC, working with DFAIT, Industry Canada and NRCAN, invested nearly $8M in Canadian public-private partnership clean technology projects under the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate, the Global Methane Initiative, and the Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnership. This resulted in a total 4-year investment of nearly $16M which leveraged over $115M in investments from the private sector and other governments. The projects delivered environmental benefits (in particular, greenhouse gas reductions), economic benefits to Canadian companies and accelerated clean technology development and deployment across a range of industrial sectors, including zero energy buildings, renewable energy, landfill gas, power generation and oil & gas.
Preliminary analysis of the proposed United States (U.S.) approach to reducing emissions of particulate matter (PM) precursors on Canada’s air quality were completed and Canada continued to engage Canadian stakeholders to help finalize elements of Canada’s proposed Air Quality Management System. Canada hosted the annual meeting of the Canada-U.S. Air Quality Committee in November 2010, during which the Committee agreed to a path forward on a PM Annex. Canada and the U.S. will also implement a number of activities in 2011-12 to mark the 20th anniversary of the Canada-U.S. Air Quality Agreement.
Environment Canada, NRCan and DFAIT’s Clean Energy Dialogue (CED) program increased collaboration and knowledge sharing with the US by coordinating clean energy technology research and development to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Federal Partner Programs | Funding Approved under CAA | Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
---|---|---|---|
Environment Canada | |||
International Obligations | $ 2,892,000 | $ 623,000 | $ 989,621 |
International Participation and Negotiations | $ 11,400,000 | $ 2,700,000 | $ 4,227,408 |
Asia-Pacific Partnership | $ 18,882,664 | $ 7,308,166 | $ 8,163,023 |
PM Annex | $ 2,200,000 | $ 550,000 | $ 153,079 |
Clean Energy Dialogue | $ 4,456,403 | $ 2,237,505 | $ 1,860,535 |
Subtotal | $ 39,831,067 | $ 13,418,671 | $ 15,393,666 |
Natural Resources Canada | |||
International Participation and Negotiations | $ 5,200,000 | $ 1,200,000 | $ 1,118,586 |
Asia-Pacific Partnership | $ 877,300 | $ 181,800 | $ 181,800 |
Clean Energy Dialogue | $ 1,761,350 | $ 922,200 | $ 854,321 |
Subtotal | $ 7,838,650 | $ 2,304,000 | $ 2,154,707 |
Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade | |||
International Obligations | $ 1,908,000 | $ 477,000 | $ 477,000 |
International Participation and Negotiations | $ 6,400,000 | $ 1,450,000 | $ 1,370,879 |
Clean Energy Dialogue | $ 956,900 | $ 600,000 | $ 557,769 |
Subtotal | $ 9,264,900 | $ 2,527,000 | $ 2,405,648 |
Industry Canada | |||
Asia-Pacific Partnership | $ 240,000 | $ 40,000 | $ 22,665 |
Subtotal | $ 240,000 | $ 40,000 | $ 22,665 |
Total Theme | $ 57,174,617 | $ 18,289,671 | $ 19,976,686 |
Lead Department |
Environment Canada |
---|
Federal Partner Name | # Programs for Federal Partners | Funding Approved under CAA (to March 31, 2011) |
Planned Spending 2010-11 | Actual Spending 2010-11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Environment Canada | 1 | $ 5,000,000 | $ 1,250,000 | $ 1,143,978 |
Total | 1 | $ 5,000,000 | $ 1,250,000 | $ 1,143,978 |
Theme: Management and Accountability - 2010-11 Expected Results
Improved accountability of the federal government to parliamentarians and Canadians for Clean Air Agenda (CAA) expenditures and activities was supported through the engagement of CAA partner departments and agencies in the development of horizontal performance reports by the Clean Air Agenda Results Management Secretariat (CAARMS).
The evaluation of the Management and Accountability (M&A) Theme concluded that the Theme “brought coherence to the horizontal reporting of CAA activities and results and has emerged as a strong success story, in large part because of the CAARMS. Central agency representatives said that it was a key model to follow for reporting on horizontal initiatives.”
Through the Clean Air Agenda - Horizontal Management, Accountability and Reporting Framework, the M&A Theme provided integrated performance data (financial and non-financial) on CAA Themes and programs for the 2007-11 mandate to CAA partner departments. The evaluation of the CAA noted as a best practice: “the approach of the CAARMS to ensure effective financial and performance data collection, compilation and reporting (acknowledged by the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat to be a model of reporting on a horizontal initiative)”. This data assisted the CAA governance and decision-makers in planning for the renewal of CAA funding post 2011.
Central agencies were assisted with their responsibilities for ongoing horizontal governance and accountability of federal management of environmental investments through analyses of the 2007-11 data developed by CAARMS.
In developing forward looking proposals for the Horizontal Management, Accountability and Reporting Framework, the M&A Theme turned its focus to finding more efficient and effective ways to integrate with existing processes (e.g., existing Assistant Deputy Minister committees) with a view to improving policy linkages and reducing administrative burdens on participating departments while supporting ongoing transparency of the federal management of clean air.
Federal Partner Programs | Funding Approved under CAA | Planned Spending 2010-11 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
---|---|---|---|
Environment Canada | |||
Management and Accountability | $ 5,000,000 | $ 1,250,000 | $ 1,143,978 |
Subtotal | $ 5,000,000 | $ 1,250,000 | $ 1,143,978 |
Total Theme | $ 5,000,000 | $ 1,250,000 | $ 1,143,978 |