This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA)
Fee Type: Other products and services (O)
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act s. 11(1)(a) and s. 11(1)(b)
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. The ATIA provides fuller details.
Performance Results: On-time responses provided in 47% of requests completed during fiscal year 2009-2010.
2010-2011 ($ thousands) |
Planning Years ($ thousands) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue |
Actual Revenue |
Full Cost |
Fiscal Year |
Forecast Revenue |
Estimated Full Cost |
4.8 |
6.2 |
850.4 |
2012-2013 |
4.8 |
807.9 |
2013-2014 |
3.5 |
767.5 |
|||
2014-2015 |
3.0 |
729.1 |
Other Information:
Please note that according to the prevailing legal opinion, where the corresponding fee introduction or most recent modification occurred prior to March 31, 2004:
|
2010-2011 ($ thousands) |
Planning Years ($ thousands) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue |
Actual Revenue |
Full Cost |
Fiscal Year |
Forecast Revenue |
Estimated Full Cost |
|
Subtotal Regulatory |
1.5 |
1.3 |
850.4 |
2012-2013 |
3.8 |
807.9 |
2013-2014 |
3.5 |
767.5 |
||||
2014-2015 |
3.0 |
729.1 |
||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services |
3.0 |
1.3 |
|
|||
Total |
4.5 |
2.6 |
External |
Service |
Performance |
Stakeholder |
---|---|---|---|
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the ATIA |
Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. |
On-time responses provided in 47% of requests completed during fiscal year 2009-2010. |
The service standard is established by the ATIA and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments made in 1986 and 1992. |
User Fee: Northwest Territories and Nunavut Mining Regulations (NTNUMRs)
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Territorial Lands Act
Date Last Modified: The Canada Mining Regulations (CMR) name was changed to Northwest Territories and Nunavut Mining Regulations in 2008. The regulations are currently in the process of modernization. The royalty sections of the NTNUMR were amended in 1999, but the remainder of the regulations were left as they were written in 1977. The metric system is being introduced in this round of amendments, thereby changing the fee schedule to reflect the amounts required by hectares instead of acres. The mining industry and other stakeholders were consulted by various methods of consultation and no complaints about the changes were submitted.
Performance Standards: Current service standards are set in existing legislation and regulation: NTNUMR amendments
Performance Results: All applications processed within set time lines.
2010-2011 ($ thousands) |
Planning Years ($ thousands) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue |
Actual Revenue |
Full Cost |
Fiscal Year |
Forecast Revenue |
Estimated Full Cost |
6,600 |
4,612 |
3,374 |
2012-2013 |
6,600 |
4,915 |
2013-2014 |
6,600 |
5,004 |
|||
2014-2015 |
6,600 |
5,094 |
Other Information:
Note 1: The fee or service triggers a series of activities related to land and resource management and the protection of the environment, all of which are controlled by the nature and scope of the resource development projects, e.g. mine development.
The 2009-2010 full costs and estimated full costs for planning years represent the best available cost data at this time. The Department is conducting a review of fees and costing methodology that may more appropriately reflect full cost of services.
User Fee: Territorial Land Use
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Territorial Lands Act and Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act
Date Last Modified: 1996
Performance Standards: Current service standards are set in existing legislation and regulation
Performance Results: All permits were issued within the regulated time frame.
2010-2011 ($ thousands) |
Planning Years ($ thousands) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue |
Actual Revenue |
Full Cost |
Fiscal Year |
Forecast Revenue |
Estimated Full Cost |
139 |
34 |
122 |
2012-2013 |
139 |
502 |
2013-2014 |
139 |
511 |
|||
2014-2015 |
139 |
520 |
Other Information:
Note 1: The fee or service triggers a series of activities related to land and resource management and the protection of the environment, all of which are controlled by the nature and scope of the resource development projects, e.g. mine development.
The 2009-2010 full costs and estimated full costs for planning years represent the best available cost data at this time. The Department is conducting a review of fees and costing methodology that may more appropriately reflect full cost of services.
User Fee: Territorial Lands
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Territorial Lands Act
Date Last Modified: 1996
Performance Standards: Performance standards vary depending on research, negotiations and environmental assessment decisions and are shared with clients throughout the process.
Performance Results: Performance standards vary depending on research, negotiations and environmental assessment decisions and are shared with clients throughout the process.
2010-2011 ($ thousands) |
Planning Years ($ thousands) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue |
Actual Revenue |
Full Cost |
Fiscal Year |
Forecast Revenue |
Estimated Full Cost |
2,300 |
1,384 |
845 |
2012-2013 |
2,300 |
1,430 |
2013-2014 |
2,300 |
1,455 |
|||
2014-2015 |
2,300 |
1,482 |
Other Information:
Note 1: The fee or service triggers a series of activities related to land and resource management and the protection of the environment, all of which are controlled by the nature and scope of the resource development projects, e.g. mine development
The 2009-2010 full costs and estimated full costs for planning years represent the best available cost data at this time. The Department is conducting a review of fees and costing methodology that may more appropriately reflect full cost of services.
User Fee: Frontier Lands Registration Regulations (FLRR)
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Canada Petroleum Resource Act (CPRA)
Date Last Modified: 1988
Performance Standards: Standard requests to be processed within 10 working days. Requests that require additional research take additional time to process (requestor is advised of the delay at the time the request is made).Please refer to Schedule 15 of the (FLRR). The tariff of fees for a service set out these column is payable at the time the service is rendered. Where a fee is payable pursuant to these Regulations, it is payable to the Receiver General.
Performance Results: All standard requests were processed within the established timeline. A number of request necessitated further research which resulted in additional processing time. Please refer to Schedule 15 of the (FLRR). The fee for a service set out these column is payable at the time the service is rendered. Where a fee is payable pursuant to these Regulations, it is payable to the Receiver General.
2010-2011 ($ thousands) |
Planning Years ($ thousands) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue |
Actual Revenue |
Full Cost |
Fiscal Year |
Forecast Revenue |
Estimated Full Cost |
18 |
20 |
111 |
2012-2013 |
35 |
202 |
2013-2014 |
28 |
165 |
|||
2014-2015 |
27 |
162 |
Other Information:
Note 1: The fee or service triggers a series of activities related to land and resource management and the protection of the environment, all of which are controlled by the nature and scope of the resource development projects, e.g. mine development
The 2009-2010 full costs and estimated full costs for planning years represent the best available cost data at this time. The Department is conducting a review of fees and costing methodology that may more appropriately reflect full cost of services.
User Fee: Territorial Quarrying
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Territorial Lands Act and Mackenzie Valley Land Use Regulations
Date Last Modified: 2003
Performance Standards: The issuance of a quarrying permit leads to the granting of a Land Use Permit. As such, there is no time line set in regulations to process/issue/reject a quarrying permit application.
Performance Results: Permits are issued once pre-conditions are met.
2010-2011 ($ thousands) |
Planning Years ($ thousands) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue |
Actual Revenue |
Full Cost |
Fiscal Year |
Forecast Revenue |
Estimated Full Cost |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2012-2013 |
0 |
0 |
2013-2014 |
0 |
0 |
|||
2014-2015 |
0 |
0 |
Other Information:
Note 1: The fee or service triggers a series of activities related to land and resource management and the protection of the environment, all of which are controlled by the nature and scope of the resource development projects, e.g. mine development
The 2009-2010 full costs and estimated full costs for planning years represent the best available cost data at the time. The Department is conducting a review of fees and costing methodology that may more appropriately reflect full cost of services.
User Fee: Territorial Water
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Northwest Territories Waters Act, Nunavut Waters and Nunavut Surface Rights Tribunal Act and Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act
Date Last Modified: 1992, 2002 and 2003 respectively
Performance Standards: Performance standards vary depending on research, negotiations and environmental assessment decisions and are shared with clients throughout the process.
Performance Results: All permits and letter patent were issued once all pre-conditions were met.
2010-2011 ($ thousands) |
Planning Years ($ thousands) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue |
Actual Revenue |
Full Cost |
Fiscal Year |
Forecast Revenue |
Estimated Full Cost |
7 |
25 |
39 |
2012-2013 |
7 |
11 |
2013-2014 |
7 |
11 |
|||
2014-2015 |
7 |
12 |
Other Information:
Note 1: The fee or service triggers a series of activities related to land and resource management and the protection of the environment, all of which are controlled by the nature and scope of the resource development projects, e.g. mine development. The Water Regulations under the Nunavut Waters and Nunavut Surface Rights Tribunal Act are currently in the process of being written. Industry and other stakeholders have not yet been extensively consulted. Changes to the fee structure are still under consideration..
The 2009-2010 full costs and estimated full costs for planning years represent the best available cost data at this time. The Department is conducting a review of fees and costing methodology that may more appropriately reflect full cost of services.
User Fee: Territorial Coal
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Territorial Lands Act
Date Last Modified: 2003
Performance Standards: Exploration permits are issued once consultations are complete.
Performance Results: Permits are issued upon completion of consultations.
2010-2011 ($ thousands) |
Planning Years ($ thousands) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue |
Actual Revenue |
Full Cost |
Fiscal Year |
Forecast Revenue |
Estimated Full Cost |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2012-2013 |
0 |
0 |
2013-2014 |
0 |
0 |
|||
2014-2015 |
0 |
0 |
Other Information:
Note 1: The fee or service triggers a series of activities related to land and resource management and the protection of the environment, all of which are controlled by the nature and scope of the resource development projects, e.g. mine development
The 2009-2010 full costs and estimated full costs for planning years represent the best available cost data at this time. The Department is conducting a review of fees and costing methodology that may more appropriately reflect full cost of services.
|
2010-2011 ($ thousands) |
Planning Years ($ thousands) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue |
Actual Revenue |
Full Cost |
Fiscal Year |
Forecast Revenue |
Estimated Full Cost |
|
Subtotal Regulatory |
9,064 |
6,074 |
4,491 |
2011-2012 |
9,081 |
7,061 |
2012-2013 |
9,074 |
7,147 |
||||
2013-2014 |
9,073 |
7,270 |
||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services |
– |
– |
– |
2011-2012 |
– |
– |
2012-2013 |
– |
– |
||||
2013-2014 |
– |
– |
||||
Total |
9,064 |
6,074 |
4,491 |
2011-2012 |
9,081 |
7,061 |
2012-2013 |
9,074 |
7,147 |
||||
2013-2014 |
9,073 |
7,270 |
Policy on Service Standards for External Fees |
|||
---|---|---|---|
External Fee |
Service Standard |
Performance Result |
Stakeholder Consultation |
Northwest Territories and Nunavut Mining Regulations (NTNUMRs) |
Current service standards are set in existing legislation and regulation: NTNUMR amendments |
All applications processed within set time lines. |
The Canada Mining Regulations (CMR) name was changed to Northwest Territories and Nunavut Mining Regulations in 2008. The regulations are currently in the process of modernization. The royalty sections of the NTNUMRs were amended in 1999, but the remainder of the regulations were left as they were written in 1977. The metric system is being introduced in this round of amendments, thereby changing the fee schedule to reflect the amounts required by hectares instead of acres. The mining industry and other stakeholders were consulted by various methods of consultation and no complaints about the changes were submitted. |
Territorial Land Use |
Current service standards are set in existing legislation and regulation. |
All permits were issued within the regulated time frame. |
Stakeholder consultation varies. It is done through regional communications strategies and various outreach activities as well as industry specific fora. |
Territorial Lands |
Performance standards vary depending on research, negotiations and environmental assessment decisions and are shared with clients throughout the process. |
All lease and letter patent were issued once all pre-conditions were met (e.g. environmental assessment decisions, lease negotiations). |
Stakeholder consultation varies. It is done through regional communications strategies and various outreach activities as well as industry specific fora. |
Frontier Lands Registration |
Standard requests to be processed within ten working days. Requests that require additional research will take additional time to be processed (requestor to be advised of the delay at the time the request is made). |
All standard requests were processed within the established timeline. A number of request necessitated further research which resulted in additional processing time. |
Stakeholder consultation varies. It is done through regional communications strategies and various outreach activities as well as industry specific fora. |
Territorial Quarrying |
A quarry permit gives the right for an area and is issued under its own regulations. You can have a quarrying permit on its own. However, you must have a Land Use Permit to take any material from the quarry. As such, there is no time line set in regulations to process/issue/reject a quarrying permit application |
Permits are issued once pre-conditions are met. |
Applications are sent to the Nunavut Impact Review Board and to various stakeholders specific to the area of the application for a period of up to 30 days. Stakeholders include communities, Inuit organizations, third-party interests and Federal and Territorial government departments. |
Territorial Coal |
Exploration permits are issued once consultations are complete. |
Permits are issued upon completion of consultations. |
Stakeholder consultation varies. It is done through regional communications strategies and various outreach activities as well as industry specific fora. |
User Fee: Canadian Agricultural Loans Act (CALA) Registration Fees
Fee Type: Regulatory (R)
Fee-Setting Authority: CALA Regulations
Date Last Modified: June 18, 2009
Performance Standards: Loans from lenders registered within 15 business days of receipt. Target is 90%.
Performance Results: 100% of loans were registered within 15 business days of receipt.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
2,482.0 | 1,204.9 | 3,004.1 | 2011-12 | 2,482.0 | 3,690.8 |
2012-13 | 2,482.0 | 2,940.8 | |||
2013-14 | 2,482.0 | 2,940.8 |
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA)(2)
Fee Type: Other Products and Services (O)
Fee-Setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. Target is 90%. For more details please visit the Access to Information Act.
Performance Results: Statutory deadlines met 100% of the time for 2010-11.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
2.1 | 2.2 | 1,229.4 | 2011-12 | 2.1 | 1,000.0 |
2012-13 | 2.1 | 1,000.0 | |||
2013-14 | 2.1 | 1,000.0 |
Other Information:
(1) The DPR instructions advised that this table be used only for revenues under the User Fee Act (UFA). The advice from our legal counsel indicated that only the CALA program as well as the fees charged under ATIA are subject to the UFA.
(2) It is the Department's practice to waive fees where the total owing per request amounts to less than $25.
Note:
According to prevailing legal opinion, where the corresponding fee introduction or most recent modification occurred prior to March 31, 2004:
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Subtotal Regulatory | 2,482.0 | 1,204.9 | 3,004.1 | 2011-12 | 2,482.0 | 3,690.8 |
2012-13 | 2,482.0 | 2,940.8 | ||||
2013-14 | 2,482.0 | 2,940.8 | ||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1,229.4 | 2011-12 | 2.1 | 1,000.0 |
2012-13 | 2.1 | 1,000.0 | ||||
2013-14 | 2.1 | 1,000.0 | ||||
Total | 2,484.1 | 1,207.1 | 4,233.5 | 2011-12 | 2,484.1 | 4,690.8 |
2012-13 | 2,484.1 | 3,940.8 | ||||
2013-14 | 2,484.1 | 3,940.8 |
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Canadian Agricultural Loans Act (CALA) Registration Fee (CALA modified and replaced the former Farm Improvement and Marketing Cooperatives Loans Act (FIMCLA)) | Loans from lenders registered within 15 business days of receipt. Target is 90% | 100% of loans were registered within 15 business days of receipt. | The CALA received Royal Assent on June 18, 2009. The service standard used for the FIMCLA has been adopted for the CALA, as the CALA modified and replaced the FIMCLA. Consultations were held on the amendments made to the program, but did not include this service standard. Consultation on this service standard can be affected in the 5-year review mandated for the CALA program. |
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA)* |
Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. Target is 90%.
The Access to Information Act provides fuller details |
Statutory deadlines were met 100% of the time in 2010-11. | The service standard is established by the Access to Information Act and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments done in 1986 and 1992. |
AgriStability Program - Administrative Cost Sharing (ACS) Fee |
Process interim applications within 30 days, 100% of the time. Process targeted advance payments within 14 days, 100% of the time. Process final applications within 75 days, 75% of the time. |
As of March 31, 2011, for the 2010 program year Interim applications processed where Canada delivers, 30.6% were processed within the 30-day standard. As of March 31, 2011, for the 2009 program year Targeted Advance Payment applications processed where Canada delivers, 88.3% were processed within the 14-day standard. |
The ACS fee is established by Federal/Provincial/Territorial (FPT) agreement. Service standards are negotiated on a national basis by the Program Administrators Working Group to ensure consistency. The AgriStability program service standards are communicated to producers through industry advisories and toll free speaking points. Discussions with provinces on service standards are ongoing. |
Other Information:
* It is the Department's practice to waive fees where the total owing per request amounts to less than $25.
Note:
As established pursuant to the Policy on Service Standards for External Fees:
User Fee: Fees for processing access requests made under the Access to Information Act
Fee Type: Other Products and Services
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Regulations
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Response is to be provided within 30 days of the receipt of the request. Pursuant to section 9 of the Act, the response time may be extended and notice of an extension is to be provided within 30 days of receipt of the request. Further details on the Access to Information Act can be found on the Department of Justice website.
Performance Results: The 30-day standard was met 90% of the time. The overall response standard (including extensions) was met 52% of the time. The delays beyond the standard were due to the third-party notification process and outside the control of the Agency.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
0.1 | 0.1 | 316.9 | 2011-12 | 0.1 | 316.9 |
2012-13 | 0.1 | 316.9 | |||
2013-14 | 0.1 | 316.9 |
Other Information: ACOA’s practice is to collect only the application fee and to waive other applicable fees, in the public interest.
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Fees charged for processing access requests filed under the Access to Information Act | Response is to be provided within 30 days of receipt of the request. Pursuant to section 9 of the Act, the response time may be extended and notice of an extension is to be provided within 30 days of receipt of the request. Further details on the Access to Information Act can be found on the Department of Justice website |
The 30-day standard was met 90% of the time. The overall response standard (including extensions) was met 52% of the time. The delays beyond the standard were due to the third-party notification process and outside the control of the Agency. | The service standard is established by the Act and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat regarding amendments made in 1986 and 1993. |
Other Information: ACOA’s practice is to collect only the application fee and to waive other applicable fees, in the public interest.
User Fee: Broker Licence and Examination Fees
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Customs Act
Date Last Modified: 1997
Performance Standards: Results received four to six weeks from the date of examination; licences processed within four months.
Performance Results: 90 percent of broker licences were processed within service standard.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
375 | 436 | 350 | 2011-12 | 415 | 350 |
2012-13 | 415 | 350 | |||
2013-14 | 415 | 350 |
User Fee: Customs Sufferance Warehouse Licence Fees
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Customs Act
Date Last Modified: 1996
Performance Standards: Applications processed within 60 business days.
Performance Results: 97 percent of all applications that were fully completed according to the requirements of the Customs Sufferance Warehouses Regulations were processed within 60 business days.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
550 | 545 | 775 | 2011-12 | 600 | 952 |
2012-13 | 600 | 952 | |||
2013-14 | 600 | 952 |
User Fee: Customs Bonded Warehouse Licence Fees
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Customs Tariff
Date Last Modified: 1996
Performance Standards: A licence is generally issued within two months from the date of the site visit by a CBSA officer, depending upon the complexity of each individual application.
Performance Results: The operator receives a notice of determination 100 percent of the time within two months from the date of the site visit.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
500 | 312 | 1,600 | 2011-12 | 500 | 1,555 |
2012-13 | 500 | 1,555 | |||
2013-14 | 500 | 1,555 |
User Fee: Storage Charges Queen's and Frontier Warehouse
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Customs Act
Date Last Modified: 2006
Performance Standards: The CBSA will ensure that goods are handled with care and stored in a secure manner, to safeguard against damage or loss, while at a Frontier Examining Warehouse or Queen's Warehouse.
Performance Results: 51 successful claims made against the Crown for damage or loss.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
20 | 36 | 29 | 2011-12 | 40 | 499 |
2012-13 | 40 | 499 | |||
2013-14 | 40 | 499 |
User Fee: Customs Special Services Fees
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Customs Act
Date Last Modified: 1986
Performance Standards: The CBSA will acknowledge requests for special services within one working day of receipt, and provide an estimated time frame for service provision. Upon completion of the service, a detailed invoice will be provided itemizing the special services completed and the associated fees for these services, ensuring transparency and consistency in the Agency's billing process.
Performance Results: The CBSA acknowledged 98.44 percent of requests for special services within 24 hours, and 99.22 percent of clients received a detailed invoice.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
220 | 149 | 254 | 2011-12 | 70 | 226 |
2012-13 | 70 | 226 | |||
2013-14 | 70 | 226 |
User Fee: Canadian Food Inspection Agency Fees Notice
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Canadian Food Inspection Agency Act
Date Last Modified: 1997
Performance Standards: Inspection activities are to be provided in accordance with corresponding federal regulations.
Performance Results: Inspection activities were provided in accordance with corresponding federal regulations.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
2,250 | 2,580 | 228 | 2011-12 | 2,600 | 230 |
2012-13 | 2,600 | 230 | |||
2013-14 | 2,600 | 230 |
User Fee: NEXUS Program Application Fee
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Customs Act
Date Last Modified: 2007
Performance Standards: There is a four- to six-week application processing time.
Performance Results: Approximately 99 percent of applications are processed within four to six weeks.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
3,560 | 3,462 | 15,351 | 2011-12 | 5,125 | 15,351 |
2012-13 | 6,125 | 15,351 | |||
2013-14 | 6,625 | 15,351 |
User Fee: Free and Secure Trade (FAST) Program Application Fee
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Customs Ac
Date Last Modified: 2007
Performance Standards: There is a four- to six-week application processing time.
Performance Results: Approximately 99 percent of applications are processed within four to six weeks.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
425 | 504 | 15,705 | 2011-12 | 450 | 15,705 |
2012-13 | 450 | 15,705 | |||
2013-14 | 450 | 15,705 |
Other information : The full costs and estimated full costs include an estimate for other government departments. These figures represent the best available cost data. The participating other government departments in the Free and Secure Trade program (FAST) from 2010 to 2014 are the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service.
User Fee: CANPASS Programs Application Fees
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Customs Act
Date Last Modified: 2002
Performance Standards: There is a four- to six-week application processing time.
Performance Results: Approximately 99 percent of applications are processed within four to six weeks.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue1 | Estimated Full Cost1 |
270* | 487* | 3,700* | 2011-12 | 380 | 3,700 |
2012-13 | 380 | 3,700 | |||
2013-14 | 380 | 3,700 |
Other Information: 1These figures represent the best available cost and revenue data. The four CANPASS programs are CANPASS Air, CANPASS Private Boats, CANPASS Private Aircraft, and CANPASS Corporate Aircraft.
User Fee: Fees Charged for Processing Access Requests Filed Under the Access to Information Act
Fee Type: Other products and services
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: The CBSA provides a response within 30 days following receipt of request. The response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the Access to Information Act. A notice of extension is sent within the initial 30 days after receipt of request. The Act provides more details.
Performance Results: In 2010–11, the CBSA received 1,607 requests under the Access to Information Act. The Agency continues to experience a higher than anticipated volume of requests. The CBSA processed 95.1 percent of requests within the statutory time frames.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
8 | 12 | 1,115 | 2011-12 | 12 | 1,400 |
2012-13 | 13 | 1,800 | |||
2013-14 | 13 | 2,200 |
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Subtotal Regulatory | 8,170 | 8,511 | 37,992 | 2011-12 | 10,180 | 38,568 |
2012-13 | 11,180 | 38,568 | ||||
2013-14 | 11,680 | 38,568 | ||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services | 8 | 12 | 1,115 | 2011-12 | 12 | 1,400 |
2012-13 | 13 | 1,800 | ||||
2013-14 | 13 | 2,200 | ||||
Total | 8,178 | 8,523 | 39,107 | 2011-12 | 10,192 | 39,968 |
2012-13 | 11,193 | 40,368 | ||||
2013-14 | 11,693 | 40,768 |
External Fee | Service Standard 1 | Performance Results 2 | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Broker licensing and examination fees | Licences processed within four months and examination results received within six weeks. | Standards are met 90 percent of the time. | Standards are set in consultation with customs broker associations. |
Customs sufferance warehouse licence fees | Application processed within 60 business days. | 97 percent of all applications that were fully completed according to the requirements of the Customs Sufferance Warehouses Regulations are processed within 60 business days. | Consultation undertaken through the Border Commercial Consultative Committee. |
Customs bonded warehouse licence fees | A licence is generally issued within two months from the date of the site visit by a CBSA officer, depending upon the complexity of each individual application. | The operator receives a notice of determination 100 percent of the time within two months from the date of the site visit. | Consultation undertaken through the Border Commercial Consultative Committee. |
Storage charges for Queen's and Frontier Warehouses | Goods to be handled with care and stored in a secure manner to safeguard against damage or loss. | 51 successful claims made against the Crown for damage or loss. | |
Customs special services fees | The CBSA will acknowledge a request for special services within one working day of receipt, and provide a likely time frame for service provision. Upon completion of the service, a detailed invoice will be provided that itemizes the completed special services and the associated fees for these services, ensuring transparency and consistency in the CBSA's billing process. | The CBSA acknowledged 98.44 percent of requests for special services within 24 hours, and 99.22 percent of clients received a detailed invoice. | Given the uniqueness of these requests and that special services are mostly performed on an ad-hoc basis, stakeholder consultations are performed on a client-by-client basis when requests are submitted. |
Canadian Food Inspection Agency Fees notice | Inspection activities are provided in accordance with corresponding federal regulations. | Inspection activities are provided in accordance with corresponding federal regulations. | |
NEXUS Program | Four to six weeks | The CBSA processed approximately 99 percent within four to six weeks. | The performance results provided reflect the Canadian part of the application process up to inviting applicants to attend an in-office interview to finalize their enrolment. The CBSA will review the existing published performance standards for processing applications with its partner (U.S. Customs and Border Protection) and consult with stakeholders to clarify the processing standards and adjust the time frames as required. Revised time frames will be made public on the Internet and in program brochures and guides. |
Free and Secure Trade (FAST) Program | Four to six weeks | The CBSA processed approximately 99 percent within four to six weeks. | The performance results provided reflect the Canadian portion of the application process up to inviting applicants to attend an in-office interview to finalize their enrolment. The CBSA will review the existing published performance standards for processing applications with its partner (U.S. Customs and Border Protection) and consult with stakeholders to clarify the processing standards and adjust time frames as required. Revised time frames will be made public on the Internet and in program brochures and guides. |
Fees charged for processing access requests filed under the Access to Information Act | The CBSA provides a response within 30 days following receipt of request. The response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the Access to Information Act. A notice of extension is sent within the initial 30 days after receipt of request. The Act provides more details. | In 2009–10, the CBSA received 1,607 requests under the Access to Information Act. The Agency continues to experience a higher than anticipated volume of requests. The CBSA processed 95.1 percent of requests within the statutory time frames. | The service standard is established by the Act and the Access to Information Regulations. The Department of Justice Canada and the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat undertook consultations with stakeholders regarding amendments made in 1986 and 1993. |
CANPASS Program | Four to six weeks | The CBSA processed approximately 99 percent within four to six weeks. | The performance results provided reflect the Canadian part of the application process up to inviting applicants to attend an in-office interview to finalize their enrolment. The CBSA will review the existing published performance standards for processing applications with its partner (U.S. Customs and Border Protection) and consult with stakeholders to clarify the processing standards and adjust time frames as required. Revised time frames will be made public on the Internet and in program brochures and guides. |
1As established pursuant to the Policy on Service Standards for External Fees:
2 Performance results are not legally subject to section 5.1 of the User Fees Act regarding fee reductions for unachieved performance.
In the 2009-2010 Annual Report, the Canada Revenue Agency indicated its plans to create a user fee policy instrument. As a first step in that plan, the Agency developed and introduced in 2010-2011 new Directives on Costing and on Cost Recovery and Charging that provide general direction and requirements on charging practices and processes. Work is now underway to review existing procedures and instructions related to how fees are determined, applied and managed to ensure they are complete and relevant.
A. User Fee: Advance Income Tax Ruling Fee
Fee Setting Authority: Financial Administration Act – 19(b)
Performance Standards: The key service standard target is to issue advance income tax rulings to taxpayers within an average of 60 calendar days of receipt of all essential information.
Performance Results: Actual 2010-2011 results: 102 days
Where a delay is unavoidable, clients are contacted and notified of the delays. In addition, the Canada Revenue Agency has recently completed a comprehensive study of its performance in this area and will work towards taking the necessary steps in gradually moving back towards its published service standard.
|
|
|
|||
A. External Fee: Advance Income Tax Ruling Fee
Service Standard: The key service standard target is to issue advance income tax rulings to taxpayers within an average of 60 calendar days of receipt of all essential information.
Performance Results: Actual 2010-2011 results: 102 days
Where a delay is unavoidable, clients are contacted and notified of the delays. In addition, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) has recently completed a comprehensive study of its performance in this area and will work towards taking the necessary steps in gradually moving back towards its published service standard.
Stakeholder Consultation: Client feedback is largely received informally during the CRA’s attendance at major tax conferences. Generally, there is a very high degree of satisfaction with the quality of advance income tax rulings. Further to consultation with stakeholders, the CRA will be conducting analysis on its service standards.
A. User Fee:Taxation Statistical Analyses and Data Processing Fee
Fee Setting Authority: Financial Administration Act-19(b)
Performance Standards: Provide statistical data to taxpayers within an average of 30 calendar days of receipt of all essential information.
Performance Results: Average time to provide the requested data is 14 days
A. External Fee: Taxation Statistical Analyses and Data Processing Fee
Service Standard: Provide statistical data to taxpayers within an average of 30 calendar days of receipt of all essential information.
Performance Results: Average time to provide the requested data was 14 days.
Stakeholder Consultation: Client satisfaction surveys were sent to external clients. The responses received indicated a satisfaction rate of 100%.
A. User Fee: Access to Information Processing Fee
Fee Type: Other Products and Services (O)
Fee Setting Authority: Access to Information and Privacy Act
Performance Standards: Processing time of 30 calendar days for the Access to Information Act, with no time limit for the extension period. The Canada Revenue Agency’s (CRA) internal processing standard is to complete 90% of filed requests within the legislative deadline.
Performance Results: 63% of the requests made under the Access to Information Act were processed within the legislative timeframe. The CRA was able to increase its capacity in 2010-2011 and successfully launched its external website. In 2011-2012, the CRA will continue to improve its performance to meet its legislative obligations with regards to the Access to Information Act.
B. Other Information: It is the Canada Revenue Agency’s practice to waive reproduction fees where the total owing per amount is less than $25.
A. External Fee: Access to Information Processing Fee
Service Standard: Processing time of 30 calendar days for the Access to Information Act, with no time limit for the extension period.
The Canada Revenue Agency’s (CRA) internal processing standard is to complete 90% of filed request within the legislative deadline.
Performance Results: 63% of the requests made under the Access to Information Act were processed within the legislative timeframe. The CRA was able to increase its capacity in 2010-2011 and successfully launched its external website. In 2011-2012, the CRA will continue to improve its performance in order to meet its legislative obligations with regards to the Access to Information Act.
Stakeholder Consultation: The service standard is established by the Access to Information Act and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken for amendments done in 1986 and 1992.
B. Other Information: It is the Canada Revenue Agency’s practice to waive reproduction fees where the total owing per amount is less than $25.
User Fee: Fees charged for the application of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA).
Fee Type: Other products and services (O)
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act and Regulations
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension is to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request.
Performance Results: Statutory deadlines were met 95 per cent of the time.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
.26 | .27 | 70.6 | 2011-12 | .32 | 72.8 |
2012-13 | |||||
2013-14 |
In preparation for implementation of the Policy on Service Standards for External Fees, CCOHS has conducted a Client Satisfaction Research Report and an Evaluation to seek feedback on user expectations and satisfaction relating to CCOHS cost recovery products and services. These reports was used as a baseline for development of service standards for CCOHS. CCOHS generates revenues from user fees from the sale of its products and services. A complete description is available at: http://www.ccohs.ca/products/
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Subscription Services | www.ccohs.ca/ccohs/standards.html. Clients not satisfied with products can request a refund. |
Overall satisfaction 85% | http://www.ccohs.ca/ccohs/reports/cust_survey.html |
Publications | www.ccohs.ca/ccohs/standards.html | 93% satisfied with the publication | http://www.ccohs.ca/ccohs/reports/cust_survey.html |
E-learning | Satisfaction or refund | 97% Satisfied with the course | Client consultations were completed prior to this new revenue item. Detailed client survey available for each participant. |
Special Projects | Clients determine standards for each project | Not applicable to contracts | Not applicable to contracts |
Other Information:
Subscription services are based upon an agreement with the client for levels of services. CCOHS monitors its service delivery by requesting client feedback, conducting periodic formal evaluations and client satisfaction surveys. Ongoing client satisfaction surveys are conducted. Results are reported in the Departmental Performance Report. CCOHS' service pledge, standards and complaints policy are located at: www.ccohs.ca/ccohs/standards.html. Links are also provided to our ongoing feedback reporting system. Evaluations of client satisfaction are located at: http://www.ccohs.ca/ccohs/reports.html
User Fee: Environmental Assessment Review Panels
Fee Type: Regulatory (R)
Fee-setting Authority: Environmental Assessment Review Panel Services Charges Order
Date Last Modified: 2002
Performance Standards: The Agency has identified shortcomings with regards to the sufficiency of the Environmental Assessment Review Panel Service Charges Order.
Performance Results: The Agency has identified solutions for addressing the deficiencies of the Environmental Assessment Review Panel Service Charges Order and will work to implement these solutions in the 2011–2012 reporting period.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
7,751.0 | 2,685.4 | 3,850.0 | 2011–12 | 7,751.0 | 11,006.4 |
2012–13 | 7,751.0 | 11,006.4 | |||
2013–14 | 7,751.0 | 11,006.4 |
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA)
Fee Type: Other Products and Services (O)
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act, ss. 11(1) and par. 77(1) d); Access to Information Regulations
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: A response is to be provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. A notice of extension must be sent within 30 days after receipt of the request.
The Access to Information Act provides further details: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/A-1/.
Performance Results: Statutory deadlines were met 96% of the time.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
0.1 | 0.1 | 205 | 2011–12 | 0.7 | 215 |
2012–13 | 0.7 | 215 | |||
2013–14 | 0.7 | 215 |
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Subtotal Regulatory | 7,751.0 | 2,685.4 | 3,850.0 | 2011–12 | 7,751.0 | 11,006.4 |
2012–13 | 7,751.0 | 11,006.4 | ||||
2013–14 | 7,751.0 | 11,006.4 | ||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services | 0.1 | 0.1 | 205 | 2011–12 | 0.7 | 215 |
2012–13 | 0.7 | 215 | ||||
2013–14 | 0.7 | 215 | ||||
Total | 7,751.1 | 2,685.5 | 4,055.0 | 2011–12 | 7,751.7 | 11,221.4 |
2012–13 | 7,751.7 | 11,221.4 | ||||
2013–14 | 7,751.7 | 11,221.4 |
Program Activity: Food Safety and Nutrition Risks
Fee Type1: R
Fee-setting Authority: CFIA Act
Date Last Modified: 1998
Performance Standards: See Note below.
Performance Results: See Note below.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost2 | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost3 |
31,203 | 31,592 | 329,043 | 2011-12 | 30,378 | 327,877 |
2012-13 | 30,962 | 319,522 | |||
2013-14 | 30,962 | 318,895 |
Other Information: N/A
Program Activity: Zoonotic Risks
Fee Type1: R
Fee-setting Authority: CFIA Act
Date Last Modified: 1998
Performance Standards: See Note below.
Performance Results: See Note below.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost2 | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost3 |
200 | 187 | 67,817 | 2011-12 | 180 | 67,577 |
2012-13 | 183 | 65,855 | |||
2013-14 | 183 | 65,725 |
Other Information: N/A
Program Activity: Animal Health Risks and Production Systems
Fee Type1: R
Fee-setting Authority: CFIA Act
Date Last Modified: 1998
Performance Standards: See Note below.
Performance Results: See Note below.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost2 | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost3 |
2,397 | 2,620 | 84,198 | 2011-12 | 2,520 | 83,899 |
2012-13 | 2,569 | 81,761 | |||
2013-14 | 2,569 | 81,601 |
Other Information: N/A
Program Activity: Plant Health Risks and Production Systems
Fee Type1: R
Fee-setting Authority: CFIA Act
Date Last Modified: 1998
Performance Standards: See Note below.
Performance Results: See Note below.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost2 | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost3 |
3,862 | 4,095 | 74,531 | 2011-12 | 3,937 | 74,267 |
2012-13 | 4,013 | 72,374 | |||
2013-14 | 4,013 | 72,233 |
Other Information: N/A
Program Activity: Biodiversity Protection
Fee Type1: R
Fee-setting Authority: CFIA Act
Date Last Modified: 1998
Performance Standards: See Note below.
Performance Results: See Note below.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost2 | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost3 |
448 | 446 | 11,764 | 2011-12 | 429 | 11,722 |
2012-13 | 437 | 11,424 | |||
2013-14 | 437 | 11,401 |
Other Information: N/A
Program Activity: Integrated Regulatory Framework
Fee Type1: R
Fee-setting Authority: CFIA Act
Date Last Modified: 1998
Performance Standards: See Note below.
Performance Results: See Note below.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost2 | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost3 |
40 | 36 | 7,470 | 2011-12 | 35 | 7,444 |
2012-13 | 35 | 7,254 | |||
2013-14 | 35 | 7,240 |
Other Information: N/A
Program Activity: Domestic and International Market Access
Fee Type1: R
Fee-setting Authority: CFIA Act
Date Last Modified: 1998
Performance Standards: See Note below.
Performance Results: See Note below.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost2 | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost3 |
15,221 | 15,185 | 37,643 | 2011-12 | 14,601 | 37,510 |
2012-13 | 14,882 | 36,554 | |||
2013-14 | 14,882 | 36,482 |
Other Information: N/A
Program Activity: Internal Services
Fee Type1: R
Fee-setting Authority: CFIA Act
Date Last Modified: 1998
Performance Standards: See Note below.
Performance Results: See Note below.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost2 | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost3 |
78 | 75 | 173,157 | 2011-12 | 72 | 172,544 |
2012-13 | 74 | 168,147 | |||
2013-14 | 74 | 167,817 |
Other Information: N/A
Program Activity: Internal Services
Fee Type1: O
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: See Note below.
Performance Results: See Note below.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost3 |
11 | 6 | 1,988 | 2011-12 | 6 | 1,981 |
2012-13 | 6 | 1,930 | |||
2013-14 | 6 | 1,927 |
Other Information: N/A
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Subtotal Regulatory | 53,449 | 54,236 | 785,623 | 2011-12 | 52,152 | 782,840 |
2012-13 | 53,155 | 762,891 | ||||
2013-14 | 53,155 | 761,394 | ||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services | 11 | 6 | 1,988 | 2011-12 | 6 | 1,981 |
2012-13 | 6 | 1,930 | ||||
2013-14 | 6 | 1,927 | ||||
Total | 53,460 | 54,242 | 787,611 | 2011-12 | 52,158 | 784,821 |
2012-13 | 53,161 | 764,821 | ||||
2013-14 | 53,161 | 763,321 |
1. R=Regulating. O=Other products and services.
2. The full cost of the user fees' activites includes all direct and indirect expenditures. The full cost also includes services provided without charge by other government departments.
3. These figures are taken from the reference levels established in the Annual Reference Level Updated (ARLU) and the estimated amounts of services provided without charge by other government departments.
Note: The Canadian Food Inspection Agency has begun a systematic review of its activities across all of its program areas with the objective of modernizing its user fee and service standard structure. The process from developing draft fee proposals to implementation of new fee and service standard structures can take some time as the User Fees Act (UFA) sets requirements, expectations and conditions for departments and agencies when proposing a new fee, or broadening the application or increasing the amount of an existing fee. This includes comprehensive stakeholder consultations, the striking of an independent complaints panel if required, and the tabling of proposals in both Houses of Parliament for review. This process can take an estimated 18 months. Once fee changes have been implemented, the Agency will begin more robust performance measurement and reporting on service standards, both requirements under the UFA.
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA) | Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; response time may be extended pursuant to Section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days of receipt of request. | Of the 424 requests completed under the ATIA last fiscal year, 132 (31%) were completed in under 30 days; 52 (12%) were completed in 31 to 60 days; 84 (20%) were completed in 61 to 120 days; and 156 (37%) were completed in 121 days or over. | The service standard is established by the ATIA and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments done in 1986 and 1992. |
Destination Inspection Service (fresh fruits and vegetables) http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/fssa/frefra/dis/dise.shtml | Goal is to achieve inspector response to 80% of the inspection requests within eight hours and 100% of requests within 24. | National Results: 81.5% within 8 hours and 95.2% within 24 hours. This is an increase of 3.86% and 7.96% respectively over 2009-2010. Met |
Service standards were established for Destination Inspection Service, in consultation with the fresh fruit and vegetable sector. The CFIA consults with the fresh fruit and vegetable sector on an ongoing basis by holding annual meetings with its National Advisory Board for destination inspection services. |
Canadian Food Inspection Agency Fees Notice Part 11 - Health of Animals Fees. Services related to veterinary biologics. Item 40. | To conform with the CFIA service delivery standards for veterinary biologics, the cost-recovered regulatory services must be delivered within specified service standards. See link below for service standards http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/vetbio/leg/vb105e.shtml |
In the current fiscal year, the CFIA's Canadian Centre for Veterinary Biologics (CCVB) met all key service standards for veterinary biologics regulatory services. Met |
Stakeholders are consulted during semi-annual meetings of the Canadian Animal Health Products Regulatory Advisory Committee (CAHPRAC) and in bilateral meetings with the Canadian Animal Health Institute. The regulated companies and other stakeholders are satisfied with the timeliness of delivery of cost-recovered regulatory services for the veterinary biologics sector. |
Dossier Review (new submission, change in product formulation or change in label claim) | See link below for service standards http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/vetbio/leg/vb105e.shtml |
Met |
|
Canadian Manufacturers of Veterinary Biologics | |||
1. Review initial submission and prepare response | Response time 4 months maximum |
Average response time was 3 months Met |
To address stakeholder concerns, a phased review system is in place which allows for submission review and response while information and data are pending. |
2. Review supplemental data and prepare response | Response time 6 weeks maximuml |
Average response time was 4 weeks Met |
|
American Manufacturers of Veterinary Biologics | |||
3. Review initial submission and prepare response | Response time 4 months maximum |
Average response time was 3 months Met |
To address stakeholder concerns about timely availability of US manufactured products, a concurrent review system was introduced to allow for submission review and response while US licensure is being finalized. |
4. Review supplemental data and prepare response | Response time 6 weeks maximum |
Average response time was 4 weeks Met |
|
Manufacturers from other countries of Veterinary Biologics | |||
5. Review initial submission and prepare response | Response time 6 months maximum |
Average response time was 4 weeks Met |
|
6. Review supplemental data and prepare response | Response time 6 weeks maximum |
Average response time was 4 weeks Met |
|
Laboratory Testing of Veterinary Biologics | |||
7. Each master cell line | Response time 4 months maximum |
Average response time was 3 months Met |
|
8. Each master seed culture | Response time 4 months maximum |
Average response time was 3 months Met |
|
9. Each pre-licensing serial tested, to a maximum of three | Response time is maximum 4 months |
Average response time was 3 months Met |
|
Facility Inspections/Audits of Veterinary Biologics | |||
10. Canadian manufacturers | Annual |
Average was annual. Met |
|
11. Canadian importers | Minimum every 3 years |
Average was every three years Met |
|
12. American manufacturers | Minimum every 3 years |
Average was every three years Met |
For facilities that are inspected annually and licensed by the US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA-APHIS), CCVB may inspect when the product is first licensed in Canada. Subsequent inspections will be arranged as necessary. CCVB may request copies of inspection reports from USDA-APHIS. |
13. Other non-Canadian manufacturers | Minimum every 4 years |
Average was every four years Met |
For facilities that are inspected regularly for Good Manufacturing Practices, CCVB may inspect when the product is first licensed in Canada. Subsequent inspections will be arranged as necessary. |
14. Issuance of Permits, Licenses and Export Certificates | Response time maximum 2 weeks |
Average response time was every 2 weeks. Met |
|
Serial Release of Veterinary Biologics | |||
15. If not tested | Response time maximum 5 days |
Average response time was 2–3 days. Met |
|
16. If tested | Response time maximum 35 days |
Due to test scheduling and set up requirements, the average response time has consistently approached the maximum response time of 35 days. Met |
|
17. Label Review and Approval | Response time maximum 4 weeks |
Average response time was 2 weeks. Met |
|
18. Advertising Review and Approval | Response time maximum 4 weeks |
Average response time was 2 weeks. Met |
To address stakeholder concerns, CCVB is no longer reviewing and approving advertising. |
19. Protocol Review for Efficacy/Safety Studies | Response time maximum 45 days |
Average response time was 30 days. Met |
|
20. Production Outline Revisions | Response time maximum 4 weeks |
Average response time was 2 weeks. Met |
|
21. Suspected Adverse Reactions | Response time maximum 4 weeks |
Average response time was 2 weeks. Met |
|
Application for Feed Registration and Ingredient Approval i) Timeliness: For 90 percent or more of the applications received |
|||
(a) Feed Section screens applications within ten days of receiving it. |
Unable to measure. |
||
(b) For products requiring a review of efficacy data, a preliminary review is conducted within 10 days of the screening date, and the results of the review are communicated to the applicant. |
Unable to measure. |
||
(c) Animal Feed Division conducts efficacy, livestock, human and environmental safety reviews and responds to applicant within 90 days. |
14.9% of applications were completed within 90 days. |
To address stakeholders concerns about capacity and timeliness of the regulatory approval process, the CFIA is working through the Canadian Animal Health Products Regulatory Advisory Committee (CAHPRAC). | |
(d) The laboratory does a desk review of proposed method of analysis within 4 weeks of receiving it. If laboratory testing is required, it will be done within 12 weeks of receiving a suitable method and test samples depending on availability of specialized equipment. |
Unable to measure. |
||
(ii) Quality | |||
(a) The Feeds Regulations are consistently interpreted and applied in registration/approval decisions. |
Met |
||
(b) Information is openly exchanged between clients and evaluation specialists. |
Met |
||
(c) Analytical methods are evaluated for specificity, selectivity, reliability and accuracy, using internationally standardized method validation procedures. |
Met |
User Fee: Inward Inspection
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Schedule 1 - Canada Grain Regulations
Date Last Modified: 1991
Performance Standards:
Performance Results:
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue1b | Actual Revenue1c | Full Cost1a | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue1b | Estimated Full Cost1d |
7,616 | 9,183 | 24,849 | 2011-12 | 7,616 | 25,280 |
2012-13 | 7,616 | 13,233 | |||
2013-14 | 7,616 | 13,233 |
1a Commencing in 2010-11, the amounts reported under ‘Full Cost’ are the actual full costs of the Canadian Grain Commission associated with providing the activity. These costs are based on the costing methodology used in Canadian Grain Commission's current User Fee Consultations. In prior years Canadian Grain Commission User Fees Reporting, ‘Full Cost’ excluded any costs that were funded by ad-hoc appropriations. This affects comparability of Canadian Grain Commission User Fees Reporting between years. Going forward, full costs will either be funded by increased user fees or a combination of user fees and appropriations depending on the outcome of our User Fees Consultations.
1b Forecasted revenue is based on projected grain volumes of 50 million tonnes and existing 2010-11 fee levels.
1c Actual revenue is based on actual 2010-11 grain volumes of 57.7 million tonnes and existing 2010-11 fee levels.
1d The amounts reported under ‘Estimated Full Cost’ are the estimated full costs based on approved funding as reported in the RPP for 2011-12. For period 2012-13 and beyond, costs are not reflective of the full costs of providing the activity for the planning years, but are limited to the funding that has been approved to date.
User Fee: Outward Inspection
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Schedule 1 - Canada Grain Regulations
Date Last Modified: 1991
Performance Standards:
Performance Results:
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue2b | Actual Revenue2c | Full Cost2a | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue2b | Estimated Full Cost2d |
12,732 | 16,547 | 29,630 | 2011-12 | 12,732 | 30,633 |
2012-13 | 12,732 | 16,036 | |||
2013-14 | 12,732 | 16,036 |
2a Commencing in 2010-11, the amounts reported under 'Full Cost' are the actual full costs of the Canadian Grain Commission associated with providing the activity. These costs are based on the costing methodology used in Canadian Grain Commission's current User Fee Consultations. In prior years Canadian Grain Commission User Fees Reporting, 'Full Cost' excluded any costs that were funded by ad-hoc appropriations. This affects comparability of Canadian Grain Commission User Fees Reporting between years. Going forward, full costs will either be funded by increased user fees or a combination of user fees and appropriations depending on the outcome of our User Fees Consultations.
2b Forecasted revenue is based on projected grain volumes of 50 million tonnes and existing 2010-11 fee levels.
2c Actual revenue is based on actual 2010-11 grain volumes of 57.7 million tonnes and existing 2010-11 fee levels.
2d The amounts reported under 'Estimated Full Cost' are the estimated full costs based on approved funding as reported in the RPP for 2011-12. For period 2012-13 and beyond, costs are not reflective of the full costs of providing the activity for the planning years, but are limited to the funding that has been approved to date.
User Fee: Inward Weighing
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Schedule 1 - Canada Grain Regulations
Date Last Modified: 1991
Performance Standards:
Performance Results:
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue3b | Actual Revenue3c | Full Cost3a | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue3b | Estimated Full Cost3d |
1,662 | 1,974 | 6,490 | 2011-12 | 1,662 | 6,922 |
2012-13 | 1,662 | 3,624 | |||
2013-14 | 1,662 | 3,624 |
3a Commencing in 2010-11, the amounts reported under 'Full Cost' are the actual full costs of the Canadian Grain Commission associated with providing the activity. These costs are based on the costing methodology used in Canadian Grain Commission's current User Fee Consultations. In prior years Canadian Grain Commission User Fees Reporting, 'Full Cost' excluded any costs that were funded by ad-hoc appropriations. This affects comparability of Canadian Grain Commission User Fees Reporting between years. Going forward, full costs will either be funded by increased user fees or a combination of user fees and appropriations depending on the outcome of our User Fees Consultations.
3b Forecasted revenue is based on projected grain volumes of 50 million tonnes and existing 2010-11 fee levels.
3c Actual revenue is based on actual 2010-11 grain volumes of 57.7 million tonnes and existing 2010-11 fee levels.
3d The amounts reported under 'Estimated Full Cost' are the estimated full costs based on approved funding as reported in the RPP for 2011-12. For period 2012-13 and beyond costs, are not reflective of the full costs of providing the activity for the planning years, but are limited to the funding that has been approved to date.
User Fee: Outward Weighing
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Schedule 1 - Canada Grain Regulations
Date Last Modified: 1991
Performance Standards:
Performance Results:
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue4b | Actual Revenue4c | Full Cost4a | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue4b | Estimated Full Cost4d |
7,109 | 8,913 | 9,874 | 2011-12 | 7,109 | 10,686 |
2012-13 | 7,109 | 5,594 | |||
2013-14 | 7,109 | 5,594 |
4a Commencing in 2010-11, the amounts reported under 'Full Cost' are the actual full costs of the Canadian Grain Commission associated with providing the activity. These costs are based on the costing methodology used in Canadian Grain Commission's current User Fee Consultations. In prior years Canadian Grain Commission User Fees Reporting, 'Full Cost' excluded any costs that were funded by ad-hoc appropriations. This affects comparability of Canadian Grain Commission User Fees Reporting between years. Going forward, full costs will either be funded by increased user fees or a combination of user fees and appropriations depending on the outcome of our User Fees Consultations.
4b Forecasted revenue is based on projected grain volumes of 50 million tonnes and existing 2010-11 fee levels.
4c Actual revenue is based on actual 2010-11 grain volumes of 57.7 million tonnes and existing 2010-11 fee levels.
4d The amounts reported under 'Estimated Full Cost' are the estimated full costs based on approved funding as reported in the RPP for 2011-12. For period 2012-13 and beyond, costs are not reflective of the full costs of providing the activity for the planning years, but are limited to the funding that has been approved to date.
User Fee: Registration and Cancellation
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Schedule 1 - Canada Grain Regulations
Date Last Modified: 1991
Performance Standards:
Performance Results:
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue5b | Actual Revenue5c | Full Cost5a | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue5b | Estimated Full Cost5d |
3,836 | 4,398 | 367 | 2011-12 | 3,836 | 364 |
2012-13 | 3,836 | 191 | |||
2013-14 | 3,836 | 191 |
5a Commencing in 2010-11, the amounts reported under ‘Full Cost’ are the actual full costs of the Canadian Grain Commission associated with providing the activity. These costs are based on the costing methodology used in Canadian Grain Commission's current User Fee Consultations. In prior years Canadian Grain Commission User Fees Reporting, ‘Full Cost’ excluded any costs that were funded by ad-hoc appropriations. This affects comparability of Canadian Grain Commission User Fees Reporting between years. Going forward, full costs will either be funded by increased user fees or a combination of user fees and appropriations depending on the outcome of our User Fees Consultations.
5b Forecasted revenue is based on projected grain volumes of 50 million tonnes and existing 2010-11 fee levels.
5c Actual revenue is based on actual 2010-11 grain volumes of 57.7 million tonnes and existing 2010-11 fee levels.
5d The amounts reported under 'Estimated Full Cost' are the estimated full costs based on approved funding as reported in the RPP for 2011-12. For period 2012-13 and beyond, costs are not reflective of the full costs of providing the activity for the planning years, but are limited to the funding that has been approved to date.
User Fee: Licensing and Producer Car
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Schedule 1 - Canada Grain Regulations
Date Last Modified: 1991
Performance Standards:
Performance Results:
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue6b | Actual Revenue6c | Full Cost6a | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue6b | Estimated Full Cost6d |
469 | 466 | 2,601 | 2011-12 | 469 | 2,982 |
2012-13 | 469 | 1,561 | |||
2013-14 | 469 | 1,561 |
6a Commencing in 2010-11, the amounts reported under ‘Full Cost’ are the actual full costs of the Canadian Grain Commission associated with providing the activity. These costs are based on the costing methodology used in Canadian Grain Commission's current User Fee Consultations. In prior years Canadian Grain Commission User Fees Reporting, ‘Full Cost’ excluded any costs that were funded by ad-hoc appropriations. This affects comparability of Canadian Grain Commission User Fees Reporting between years. Going forward, full costs will either be funded by increased user fees or a combination of user fees and appropriations depending on the outcome of our User Fees Consultations.
6b Forecasted revenue is based on projected grain volumes of 50 million tonnes and existing 2010-11 fee levels.
6c Actual revenue is based on actual 2010-11 grain volumes of 57.7 million tonnes and existing 2010-11 fee levels.
6d The amounts reported under 'Estimated Full Cost' are the estimated full costs based on approved funding as reported in the RPP for 2011-12. For period 2012-13 and beyond, costs are not reflective of the full costs of providing the activity for the planning years, but are limited to the funding that has been approved to date.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue7b | Actual Revenue7c | Full Cost7a | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue7b | Estimated Full Cost7d | |
Subtotal Regulatory | 33,424 | 41,481 | 73,811 | 2011-12 | 33,424 | 76,866 |
2012-13 | 33,424 | 40,238 | ||||
2013-14 | 33,424 | 40,238 | ||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services5 | 3,759 | 3,563 | 4,760 | 2011-12 | 3,759 | 4,350 |
2012-13 | 3,759 | 2,277 | ||||
2013-14 | 3,759 | 2,277 | ||||
Total | 37,183 | 45,044 | 78,571 | 2011-12 | 37,183 | 81,216 |
2012-13 | 37,183 | 42,515 | ||||
2013-14 | 37,183 | 42,515 |
7a Commencing in 2010-11, the amounts reported under ‘Full Cost’ are the actual full costs of the Canadian Grain Commission associated with providing the activity. These costs are based on the costing methodology used in Canadian Grain Commission's current User Fee Consultations. In prior years Canadian Grain Commission User Fees Reporting, ‘Full Cost’ excluded any costs that were funded by ad-hoc appropriations. This affects comparability of Canadian Grain Commission User Fees Reporting between years. Going forward, full costs will either be funded by increased user fees or a combination of user fees and appropriations depending on the outcome of our User Fees Consultations.
7b Forecasted revenue is based on projected grain volumes of 50 million tonnes and existing 2010-11 fee levels.
7c Actual revenue is based on actual 2010-11 grain volumes of 57.7 million tonnes and existing 2010-11 fee levels.
7d The amounts reported under ‘Estimated Full Cost’ are the estimated full costs based on approved funding as reported in the RPP for 2011-12. For period 2012-13 and beyond, costs are not reflective of the full costs of providing the activity for the planning years, but are limited to the funding that has been approved to date.
7e This includes fees related to Access to Information and Privacy (ATIP) requests. The fees collected by the Canadian Grain Commission related to ATIP requests during 2010-11 were negligible ($5.00). The majority of ATIP requests involving the Canadian Grain Commission were coordinated through AAFC and any related ATIP fees were collected by AAFC.
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results |
---|---|---|
Inward Inspection |
|
From April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011, Canadian Grain Commission staff inspected 290,471 inward grain cars. The grading of inward grain cars was 98.3% accurate. Service standards were met 100% of the time. |
Outward Inspection |
|
From April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011, Canadian Grain Commission staff issued 8,257 certificates of quality representing 29,566,354 tonnes of Canadian export grain. Service Standards were met 100% of the time. |
Inward Weighing |
|
From April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011, Canadian Grain Commission staff officially weighed 300,567 inward grain cars. Service Standards were met 100% of the time. |
Outward Weighing |
|
From April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011, Canadian Grain Commission staff officially weighed 26,237,496 tonnes of grain for export from Canada. Service Standards were met 100% of the time. |
Registration and Cancellation |
|
Service Standards were met 100% of the time. |
Licensing |
|
As of March 31, 2011, the Canadian Grain Commission had 156 licensees. It should be noted that many licensees hold multiple licences (e.g., primary, grain dealer, terminal, transfer). Service standards were met 100% of the time. |
User Fees Act, Access to Information and Privacy Secretariat (ATIP), 2010-11
User Fee: Fees charged for processing access requests files under the Access to Information Act
Fee Type: Other products and services
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Response provided within 30 days of receipt of request. Response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the Act. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days of receipt of request.
Performance Results: See Note 1
2010-11 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
N/A | $2,500 | $952,000 (See Note 2) |
2011-12 | $1,500 | $1,071,000 |
2012-13 | (See Note 3) | (See Note 4) | |||
2013-14 | (See Note 3) | (See Note 4) |
Other Information:
Note 1: Taking into account external factors, 75% of requests were completed within the prescribed time frame.
Note 2: This figure consists of salary and O&M costs in relation to the administration of the Access to Information Act.
Note 3: This figure cannot be provided as revenue is based on information requests received under the Access to Information Act.
Note 4: Budget information not provided in advance. Cannot provide figures for 2012-13 and 2013-14.
Please note that according to prevailing legal opinion, where the corresponding fee introduction or most recent modification occurred prior to March 31, 2004 the:
Policy on Service Standards for External Feeds, Access to Information and Privacy Secretariat (ATIP), 2010-11
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Fees charged for processing access requests filed under the Access to Information Act. |
Response provided within 30 days of receipt of request. Response time may be extended pursuant to s. 9 of the Access to Information Act. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days of receipt of request. |
75% of requests were completed on time. |
This service standard is established by the Access to Information Act and its regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments done in 1986 and 1992. |
Other Information:
Website on Access to Information: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/a-1/8.html
Website on Access to Information Regulations: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/a-1/sor-83-507/45.html
User Fees Act, Canadian Audio-Visual Certification Office (CAVCO), 2010-11
User Fee: External fees - Film or Video Production Services Tax Credit Program (PSTC)
Fee Type: Accreditation fees
Fee-setting Authority: Department of Canadian Heritage Act and Financial Administration Act
Date Last Modified: The accreditation fees were introduced on October 24, 1998 and have never been modified.
Performance Standards: Issuance of certificates within 10 weeks from receipt of a complete application.
Performance Results: 20%
2010-11 | Planning Years 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
$800,000 | $795,000 | $667,709 | 2011-12 | $800,000 | $700,000 |
2012-13 | $800,000 | $700,000 | |||
2013-14 | $800,000 | $700,000 |
Other Information: Departments may use this area to describe any significant factors of events that have affected user fee activities, e.g. how performance results may have been affected by external factors of what measures, beyond strict legal requirements, are being taken to address performance gaps.
(1) As a full vote-netted cost centre, the Canadian Audio-Visual Certification Office (CAVCO) must maintain a careful balance between projected program costs which it controls and revenues which it does not control. The amount of user fees collected is dependent on its clients' yearly production activity which is cyclical and dependent on a number of outside economic factors. While industry activity was high in 2010-11, there is no assurance that it will remain so.
Please note that according to prevailing legal opinion, where the corresponding fee introduction or most recent modification occurred prior to March 31, 2004:
Policy on Service Standards for External Feeds, Canadian Audio-Visual Certification Office (CAVCO), 2010-11
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Certification Fees: Fee levy under the Film or Video Production Services Tax Credit Program (PSTC) |
The current service standard of CAVCO is the issuance of certificates within 10 weeks from receipt of a complete application. |
All 159 applications received under the PSTC during 2010-11 were certified by the Minister of Canadian Heritage during the year. However, since most of CAVCO’s human resources were allocated to the new CPTC online system, the average accreditation time for the PSTC certificates was about 15 weeks. | N/A |
Other Information: Departments may use this area to relay any additional information determined to be relevant to their service standards or to their external fees more generally, e.g. plans for future stakeholder consultations or planned measures for improving service of for addressing performance gaps.
In 2011-12, PSTC applicants will be able to use CAVCO online application system.
User Fees Act, Canadian Audio-Visual Certification Office (CAVCO), 2010-11
User Fee: External fees - Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit Program (CPTC)
Fee Type: Certification fees
Fee-setting Authority: Department of Canadian Heritage Act, Financial Administration Act
The Canadian Audio-Visual Certification Office (CAVCO) of Canadian Heritage co-administers this program with the Canada Revenue Agency.Date Last Modified: February 26, 2004
Performance Standards: Issuance of certificates within 10 weeks from receipt of a complete application.
Performance Results: 35%
2010-11 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
$3,000,000 | $2,933,152 | $2,503,909 | 2011-12 | $3,000,000 | $2,600,000 |
2012-13 | $3,000,000 | $2,600,000 | |||
2013-14 | $3,000,000 | $2,600,000 |
Other Information: Departments may use this area to describe any significant factors of events that have affected user fee activities, e.g. how performance results may have been affected by external factors of what measures, beyond strict legal requirements, are being taken to address performance gaps.
(1) As a full vote-netted cost centre, CAVCO must maintain a careful balance between projected program costs which it controls and revenues which it does not control. The amount of user fees collected is dependent on its clients' yearly production activity which is cyclical and dependent on a number of outside economic factors. While industry activity was high in 2010-11, there is no assurance that it will remain so.Please note that according to prevailing legal opinion, where the corresponding fee introduction or most recent modification occurred prior to March 31, 2004:
Policy on Service Standards for External Feeds, Canadian Audio-Visual Certification Office (CAVCO), 2010-11
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Certification Fee: Fee levy under the Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit Program (CPTC) |
The current service standard of the Canadian Audio-Visual Certification Office (CAVCO) is the issuance of certificates within 10 weeks from receipt of a complete application. |
CAVCO only met its service standards in 2010-11 for 35% of the applications due to staffing issues (maternity, paternity and extended sick leaves) and an increased backlog of applications due to problems with its new online system. By January 2011, many of the technical problems related to the system were fixed, which led to substantial improvements in performance for the remainder of the applications, from a 16-week certificate delivery standard to 12 weeks. Staffing will also return to normal in 2011-12. | N/A |
Other Information: Departments may use this area to relay any additional information determined to be relevant to their service standards or to their external fees more generally, e.g. plans for future stakeholder consultations or planned measures for improving service of for addressing performance gaps.
2010-11 was the first year of CAVCO online. The system is currently reliable. However, during the first months of operations, unforeseen technical issues emerged, which have affected CAVCO’s performance.
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Special publications and products Prices of special publications and products are determined by comparing market prices and prices of other Canadian Conservation Institute (CCI) publications. CCI also considers the size and nature of the content, as well as printing and translating costs. |
CCI responds to general questions or requests about publications within 2 working days. CCI processes orders for publications and special products within a week of receiving payment. |
100% of requests were processed according to service standards. | N/A |
Learning opportunities-workshops |
CCI responds to general questions about training within 2 working days. For regional workshops, clients are notified of acceptance or rejection within 8 weeks of the December 15, 2010 application deadline. CCI responds to additional workshop requests within 3 weeks. CCI maintains an overall client satisfaction rate of 100%, based on 11 quality parameters. (Note C1) Target of participants who reported improvement in knowledge, skills and practices is at least 90%. |
100% of participants reported improved knowledge, skills and practices. | CCI consulted workshops stakeholders (i.e. Provincial Museum Associations) March 24, 2010, as part of an annual meeting with representatives. |
Library services Foreign clients Canadian and Foreign clients Replacement costs for loss or damage: cost of the item plus a CAN $65 processing fee. |
CCI responds to general questions or requests about library services within 2 working days. CCI processes requests for photocopies, books or facsimile transmissions within 1 week of receiving the request. |
100% of requests are processed within 1 week. | N/A |
Other Information:
C1: Quality parameters (client satisfaction survey): Processing of the request, acknowledgment of receipt of the initial request, explanation of fees, explanation of service provided, communications in the course of the project, speed of service, quality of service, usefulness of service, quality of documents supplied (reports), attitude of personnel (friendly, courteous, competent), overall value.
C2: Client categories: CCI places clients in 18 categories to determine eligibility for various services and fees payable.
User Fee: Fees charged for processing access requests filed under the Access to Information Act
Fee Type: Other products and services
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: The Commission provides a response within 30 days following the receipt of a request. The response time may be extended pursuant to Section 9 of the Access to Information Act. If required, a notice of extension is sent within the initial 30 days after the receipt of a request.
Performance Results: In 2010-11, the Commision received 44 requests under the Access to Information Act. The Commission processed 50 percent of requests within the statutory time frames.
2010-11 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
0.3 | 0.2 | 219 | 2011-12 | 0.2 | 220 |
2012-13 | 0.2 | 225 | |||
2013-14 | 0.2 | 230 |
User Fee: Processing of access requests
Fee Type: R (R: Regulation, or O: other goods and services)
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Response within the time limit prescribed by the Act; minimum of 80%
Performance Results: Response time of 87.9%
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
0.0 | 1,305.0 | 4,545.4 | 2011-12 | n.a. | n.a. |
2012-13 | n.a. | n.a. | |||
2013-14 | n.a. | n.a. |
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act | Minimum of 80.0% | 87.9% for 2010-2011 | Not applicable, as per policies and guidelines issued by the Treasury Board Secretariat, institution responsible for the ATIP program |
Last year performance results didn't reach the performance standard (66.3%). Corrective measures were taken in 2010-2011.
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA)
Fee Type: Other Products and Services (O)
Fee-setting Authority: Access to information Act
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Response provided within 30 days of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. The ATIA provides fuller details: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/A-1/218072.html
Performance Results:
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
0 | 2 | 2 | 2011-12 | ||
2012-13 | |||||
2013-14 |
Other Information:
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Subtotal Regulatory | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2011-12 | 0 | 0 |
2012-13 | 0 | 0 | ||||
2013-14 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2011-12 | 0 | 0 |
2012-13 | 0 | 0 | ||||
2013-14 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Total | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2011-12 | 0 | 0 |
2012-13 | 0 | 0 | ||||
2013-14 | 0 | 0 |
The only fee that the CRTC currently collects which is subject to the reporting requirements of the User Fees Act relates to the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act.
7. 2010-11 ($000) | 7. Planning Years ($000) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year |
Forecast Revenue |
Estimated Full Cost |
$0.5 | $0.5 | $173 | 2011-12 | $1 | $200 |
2012-13 | $1 | $200 | |||
2013-14 | $1 | $200 |
External Fees and Policy on Service Standard for External Fees
CRTC assesses fees pursuant to the Broadcasting Licence Fee Regulations, 1997, and the Telecommunications Fees Regulations, 2010. These regulations can be located on the CRTC web site at www.crtc.gc.ca. The CRTC has received a legal opinion indicating that the Part I broadcasting licence fees and telecommunications fees are considered to be external “regulatory fees” and not “user fees” as defined in the User Fees Act. Thus these fees, and the external reporting of any information related to these fees, are not subject to the provisions of the User Fees Act (UFA), but rather the Treasury Board Policy on Service Standards for External Fees.
The Federal Court of Appeal dealt with a reference case regarding proposed changes to the CRTC Telecommunications Fees Regulations. In the Federal Court of Appeal’s decision issued on July 2, 2009 (http://decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca/en/2009/2009fca224/2009fca224.html) it was determined that changes to the Telecommunications Fees Regulations would not be subject to the provisions of the User Fees Act. As a result of the Court’s decision, and a public process, the Commission decided with Treasury Board approval, to make the Telecommunications Fees Regulations, 2010, replacing the Telecommunications Fees Regulations, 1995. The Telecom Fees Regulations, 2010 came into force on 1 April 2010. For further details see Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-183 New Telecommunications Fees Regulations on CRTC web site http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2010/2010-183.htm
In order to be as comprehensive and transparent as possible with respect to CRTC external fees, information on broadcasting and telecommunications fees is being presented in the following table.
2010-2011 | Planning Years | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name of Fee | Fee Type | Fee Setting Authority | Date Last Modified | Forecasted Revenue | Actual Revenue ($000) |
Full Cost ($000) |
Performance Standards | Performance Results | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue ($000) | Estimated Full Cost ($000) |
Broadcasting Licence Fees Part I Part II |
Regulatory (R) Right & Privilege/ Regulatory Charges |
Broadcasting Act (Section 11) Broadcasting Licence Fee Regulations 1997 |
1997 2010 (note 1) |
$35.8M $100.0M |
$35.8M $100.0M |
$35.8M $100.0M |
2011-12 | $31.9M | $31.9M | ||
2012-13 | $29.4M | $29.4M | |||||||||
2013-14 | $29.4M | $29.4M | |||||||||
2011-12 | $ 101.8M (note 2) |
$101.8M (note 3) |
|||||||||
2012-13 | $ 101.8M (note 2) |
$101.8M (note 3) |
|||||||||
2013-14 | $ 101.8M (note 2) |
$101.8M (note 3) |
|||||||||
Telecommunications Fees | Regulatory (R) Other (O) |
Telecommuni-cations Act (Section 68) Telecommuni-cations Fee Regulations 1995 Administrative monetary penalty AMPs and interest) |
2010 |
$27.6M - |
$27.3M 1.9 |
$27.3M - |
2011-12 | $27.3M | $27.3M | ||
2012-13 | $26.0M | $26.0M | |||||||||
2013-14 | $26.0M | $26.0M | |||||||||
n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||
Total | $163.4M | $165.0M | $163.1M | 2011-12 | $161.0M | $161.0M | |||||
2012-13 | $157.2M | $157.2M | |||||||||
2013-14 | $157.2M | $157.2M |
Note 1: Pursuant to section 11 of the Broadcasting Act, the Commission received Treasury Board approval in order to enact the amendments to the Broadcasting Licence Fee Regulations, 1997 (the amended Regulations). The amended Regulations came into effect on 23 June 2010.
Note 2: Commencing in 2011, the Part II licence fee will be adjusted annually on a compound basis in accordance with the percentage increase or decrease, as the case may be, to the Consumer Price Index for the calendar year prior to the year of the adjustment.
Note 3: Part II licence fees recover part of the Government of Canada’s substantial annual investment in the Canadian broadcasting system.
The CRTC collects fees under the authority of the Broadcasting Act and Telecommunications Act and the regulations made pursuant to these Acts, namely the Broadcasting Licence Fee Regulations, 1997 and the Telecommunications Fees Regulations, 2010. For fiscal year 2010-2011 the Part I broadcasting licence fees total $ 35.8 million made up of $ 23.0 million respendable and $ 12.8 million non-respendable revenues. For the same period, telecommunications fees totalled $ 27.3 million made up of $19.7 million in respendable and $7.6 million in non-respendable revenues.
Section 11 of the Broadcasting Act empowers the Commission to make regulations respecting licence fees. These regulations apply to all licensees other than those classes of undertakings specifically exempted under section 2 and section 11(3) of the fee regulations. Every licensee subject to the regulations is required to pay a Part I and a Part II licence fee to the Commission annually. For 2010-2011 the CRTC collected a total of $35.8M in Part I fees and $100 M in Part II fees.
The Part I fee is based on the broadcasting regulatory costs incurred each year by the Commission and other federal departments or agencies, excluding Industry Canada spectrum management costs (which are recovered as a component of Part II licence fees). The Part I fee is equal to the aggregate of:
The estimated total broadcasting regulatory costs of the Commission are set out in the Commission’s Expenditure Plan published in Part III of the Estimates of the Government of Canada (i.e. Part III Report on Plans and Priorities).
There is an annual adjustment amount to the Part I fee to adjust estimated costs to actual expenditures. Any excess fees or shortfalls are credited or charged to the licensee in a following year’s invoice.
On October 7, 2009 the Minister of Canadian Heritage announced an out of court settlement regarding CRTC Part II broadcasting licence fees.
This brought an end to the litigation that commenced in 2003. As part of this agreement, in exchange for the plaintiffs agreeing to discontinue their lawsuit, the Government issued a remission order (2009-1715 dated October 7, 2009) with respect to: a) the amount of Part II licence fees and interest that would have been payable by applicable licensees during the Government’s fiscal years 2007-08, 2008-09 and 2009-10; and b) the amount of costs and interest awarded to Her Majesty in right of Canada against the appellants by the Federal Court of Appeal decision dated April 28, 2008. The CRTC has recorded those transactions required to address that part of the remission order dealing with fees and accrued interest, while Canadian Heritage has recorded those transactions related to the award of costs and accrued interest.
As part of this settlement, the Government also recommended that the CRTC develop a new, forward-looking fee Part II licence regime that would be capped at $100 million per year. On December 22, 2009 the CRTC launched a public consultation process (Broadcasting Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-797) to consider changes to the Broadcasting Licence Fee Regulations,1997 to implement this new fee regime. The amended regulations come into effect on June 23 2010. For further details on the amended Broadcasting Licence Fee Regulations, 1997 relating to Part II fees see Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-476 on CRTC web site at http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2010/2010-476.htm
Section 68 of the Telecommunications Act sets out the authority for collecting telecommunications fees from carriers that the Commission regulates. For 2010-2011, the CRTC collected $27.3million in telecommunications fees.
On March 25, 2010 the CRTC issued Telecom Decision 2010-183 that announced the new Telecommunications Fees Regulations, 2010 (Regulations). These new Regulations came into force on April 1, 2010 and replaced the Telecommunications Fees Regulations, 1995. For further details see Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-183 New Telecommunications Fees Regulations on CRTC web site http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2010/2010-183.htm
The new fees Regulations require all telecommunications service providers (TSPs), or groups of related TSPs, with at least $10 million dollars in Canadian telecommunications service revenues (CTSR) to pay telecommunications fees, whether or not they file a tariff for approval with the Commission.
The annual fees the CRTC collects is equal to the aggregate of:
The Commission’s estimated total telecommunications regulatory costs are set out in the Commission’s Expenditure Plan published in Part III of the Estimates of the Government of Canada (i.e., Part III Report on Plans and Priorities). There is an annual adjustment amount to the telecommunications fees to adjust estimated costs to actual expenditures. Any excess fees or shortfalls are credited or charged to the carriers in a following year’s invoice.
Under the CRTC’s dispute resolution process regarding the assessment of broadcasting licence fees and telecommunications fees:
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of access to information requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA)
Fee Type: Other products and services (O)
Fee-Setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notices of extension are to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. The Access to Information Act provides fuller details.
Performance Results: The Canadian Space Agency (CSA) received 22 new requests for access to information and had one that was outstanding from the previous period. Two were reported to be processed in the following year, for a total of 21 processed requests. CSA routinely waives fees in accordance with TBS guidelines. The response time was within time limits in 91% of the requests.
2010-2011 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
0.1 | 0.1 | 80 | 2011-2012 | 0.1 | 80 |
2012-2013 | 0.1 | 80 | |||
2013-2014 | 0.1 | 80 |
Other Information: The CSA collects user fees for information requests in accordance to the Access to Information Act. The total user fees collected in 2010-2011 are for application fees. There was no need to charge for preparation and search fees.
User Fees and Regulatory Charges (User Fees Act)
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA)
Fee Type: Other products and services
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Responses provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request.
The Access to Information Act provides fuller details.
Performance Results: Requests completed within:
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost |
---|---|---|
< 1 | < 1 | 62 |
Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
---|---|---|
2011–12 | < 1 | 64 |
2012–13 | < 1 | 65 |
2013–14 | < 1 | 67 |
(Policy on Service Standards for External Fees)
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA) |
Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. The Access to Information Act provides fuller details. |
Requests completed within: 30 days – 50% 31-60 days – 20% 61-120 days – 30% |
The service standard is established by the Access to Information Act and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments done in 1986 and 1992. |
The following tables list Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) user fees and provide information regarding the history of the fees, client service outcomes, revenue and associated costs.
Notes regarding all fees:
1. User Fee: Right of Permanent Residence Fee (RPRF)
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Financial Administration Act (FAA); Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA); and Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (IRPR)
Date Last Modified: 03-05-2006
Performance Standards: This fee is collected for all persons who become permanent residents of Canada except for persons who are exempted by regulations from paying the fee (protected persons and dependent children).
Performance Results: The fee is collected for 100% of applicants who do not qualify for a regulatory exemption. This fee is closely linked to the processing of permanent resident applications in Canada and overseas.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
88,000 | 88,599 | Costs associated with this fee are related to the overall cost of the immigration regulatory regime estimated to exceed $88 million. | 2011-12 | 92,400 | Costs associated with this fee are related to the overall cost of the immigration regulatory regime estimated to exceed $88 million. |
2012-13 | 97,000 | ||||
2013-14 | 101,900 |
2. User Fee: Permanent Residence Application Fee, Permanent Resident Card Fee, Permanent Resident Travel Document Fee and Sponsorship Application Fee for Family Classes
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: IRPA and IRPR
Date Last Modified: 28-06-2002
Performance Standards:
Permanent Resident Visas Processed Overseas: Priority processing is given to the reunification of immediate family members—spouses, partners and dependent children—and to federal skilled workers. With the implementation of the updated Ministerial Instructions for federal skilled workers (the first set of Ministerial Instructions for federal skilled workers, issued November 28, 2008, were updated by a second set issued June 26, 2010), there is now an additional commitment to process these cases within 12 months. As of April 1, 2010, a new service standard was implemented for immediate members of the family class (i.e., spouses, partners and children) such that applications are processed within 12 months from the time the application is received at the Case Processing Centre (CPC)–Mississauga.
Permanent Resident Cards (PRCs): There are two types of clients for the PRC: new permanent residents who have never had a PRC and existing permanent residents renewing, replacing or requesting their first PRC. As of April 2010, PRCs for new clients are subject to a 40 business-day processing service standard.
Permanent Resident Travel Documents Processed Overseas: Processed expeditiously.
Performance Results:
Applications Processed Overseas: In calendar year 2010, overseas missions exceeded the overall operational visa target by almost 2%, issuing approximately 245,000 permanent resident visas.
Also in calendar year 2010, missions finalized 80% of immediate family class applications (spouses, partners and children) within 14 months. In April 2010, CIC implemented internal processing standards for file creation at overseas missions, in an attempt to meet the service standard in the future. The impact of these internal changes should reduce the processing time for this category in the coming months.
As part of the commitments for the federal skilled worker applications accepted under the 2010 Ministerial Instructions, missions finalized 80% of these applications within 13 months.
The CIC website presents details of processing times for a 12-month period by each overseas mission and by immigration category. It shows the processing times for 80% of the cases and is updated quarterly. For data consistency, the website of every overseas mission links to pages concerning processing times on the CIC website.
Permanent Residence Applications Processed in Canada: CPC–Vegreville and the in-Canada regions currently process applications for permanent residence for protected persons, live-in caregivers eligible to apply under the class, and members of the spouse and common law partner in Canada class. At the end of calendar year 2010, the in-Canada processing time for permanent residence applications was within 21 months for 80% of live-in caregivers; within 16 months for 80% of protected persons in Canada; and within 19 months for spouses, partners and children. In 2010, CPC–Vegreville processed permanent residence applications for 7,812 live-in caregivers; 9,289 protected persons in Canada; and 5,391 spouses, partners and children. Recent processing times for CPCs are updated weekly on the CIC website.
Permanent Resident Cards: Processing times for new applications were kept within the new 40-business-day service standard. In fiscal year 2010–11, 79% of Phase I PRCs met this service standard.
Permanent Resident Travel Documents Processed Overseas: In calendar year 2010, 80% of applications were processed within seven days.
Sponsorship Application for Family Class Processed Abroad: CPC–Mississauga completes the assessment of sponsorship eligibility for members of the family class processed abroad. Priority processing is given to spouses, common-law and conjugal partners, and dependent children. At the end of calendar year 2010, the in-Canada processing time for family class sponsorship applications was within one month for 80% of spouses, partners and children and within 40 months for 80% of parents and grandparents. Orphans and adopted children are processed daily on a priority basis. In 2010, CPC–Mississauga processed family class sponsorship applications for 72,646 spouses, partners and children, and for 23,874 parents and grandparents. Recent processing times for CPCs are updated weekly on the CIC website.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
176,900 | 163,756 | 400,875 | 2011-12 | 173,900 | 400,875 |
2012-13 | 175,700 | 400,875 | |||
2013-14 | 177,700 | 400,875 |
3. User Fee:
Fee Type: Work Permit Fee (Individuals and Performing Artist Groups)
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: IRPA and IRPR
Date Last Modified: 02-01-1997
Performance Standards:
Work Permits Processed Overseas and in Canada: Processed expeditiously.
Performance Results:
Work Permits Processed Overseas: In calendar year 2010, 80% of applications were finalized within six weeks. The CIC website presents details of processing times for a 12-month rolling period, for each overseas mission. It shows the processing times for 80% of the cases finalized within the 12-month period and it is updated quarterly. In 2010, work permits and extensions were processed overseas for 136,290 persons.
Work Permits Processed in Canada: CPC–Vegreville processes work permit applications in various formats, including both paper and electronic applications. Recent processing times for CPCs are updated on the CIC website weekly. Work permits for those who
are changing employers are prioritized, as applicants extending their permit with the same employer benefit from implied status, and may continue to work until a decision is rendered on their case, with certain conditions. At the end of calendar year 2010, the processing time for 80% of temporary foreign worker cases was within 11 weeks. The volume of work permits and extensions
processed in Canada in 2010 was 196,314 persons.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
42,700 | 46,166 | 103,245 | 2011-12 | 46,600 | 103,245 |
2012-13 | 50,800 | 103,245 | |||
2013-14 | 55,400 | 103,245 |
4. User Fee: Study Permit Fee
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: IRPA and IRPR
Date Last Modified: 01-06-1994
Performance Standards:
Study Permits Processed Overseas and in Canada: Processed expeditiously.
Performance Results:
Study Permits Processed Overseas: In calendar year 2010, 80% of applications were processed within five weeks. The CIC website details of processing times for a 12-month rolling period, for each overseas mission. It shows the processing times for 80% of the finalized cases and it is updated quarterly. In 2010, the volume of study permits and extensions issued overseas was 93,814 persons.
Study Permits Processed in Canada: CPC–Vegreville processes study permit applications in various formats, including both paper and electronic applications. Recent processing times for CPCs are updated weekly on the CIC website. At the end of calendar year 2010, the processing time for 80% of temporary resident student cases was within eight weeks. The volume of study permits and extensions issued in Canada in 2010 was for 66,343 persons.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
24,800 | 26,315 | 42,182 | 2011-12 | 26,900 | 42,812 |
2012-13 | 26,900 | 42,812 | |||
2013-14 | 26,900 | 42,812 |
5. User Fee: Temporary Resident Visa Application Fee, Extension of Authorization to Remain in Canada as a Temporary Resident Fee and Restoration of Temporary Resident Status Fee
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: IRPA and IRPR
Date Last Modified: 02-01-1997
Performance Standards:
Temporary Resident Visas (TRVs):Processed expeditiously.
Performance Results:
At the end of calendar year 2010, the in-Canada processing time for 80% of TRV cases was within 12 weeks. CIC issued 66,053 TRVs and extensions in Canada in 2010.
TRVs: In calendar year 2010, 80% of TRV applications abroad were finalized within two weeks. The CIC website presents details of processing times for a 12-month rolling period for each overseas mission. It shows the processing times for 80% of the finalized cases within the 12-month period and is updated quarterly.
Extensions of Authorization to Remain in Canada as a Temporary Resident: CPC–Vegreville processes extensions of authorization to remain in Canada as a temporary resident in various formats, including both paper and electronic applications. Recent processing times for CPCs are updated weekly on the CIC website.
Restoration of Temporary Resident Status: These applications are submitted into various processing streams, including students, workers and visitors, depending on the status that the applicant needs to regain. They are processed according to the processing times of the stream under which they are applying, and thus there are no separate processing times available for these cases.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
98,300 | 102,673 | 155,558 | 2011-12 | 101,200 | 155,558 |
2012-13 | 104,200 | 155,558 | |||
2013-14 | 107,300 | 155,558 |
6. User Fee: Temporary Resident Permit (TRP) Fee
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: IRPA and IRPR
Date Last Modified: 02-01-1997
Performance Standards:
TRPs Processed Overseas and in Canada: Processed expeditiously. Currently, there is no service standard for these cases due to the variability in the complexity of these cases and the inadmissibilities being addressed within each application.
Performance Results:
TRPs Processed Overseas: TRPs are processed to overcome an inadmissibility identified during the processing of any type of visa application. There are no data on processing times for TRPs abroad. They are processed expeditiously but the variability in the complexity of the cases and the inadmissibilities being addressed mean that no meaningful service standard can be established.
TRPs Processed in Canada: TRPs are received at CPC–Vegreville and may be referred to local CIC offices for processing. In calendar year 2010, 80% of TRP applications and extensions were processed within 15 months.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
2,100 | 2,365 | 6,909 | 2011-12 | 2,100 | 6,909 |
2012-13 | 2,100 | 6,909 | |||
2013-14 | 2,100 | 6,909 |
7. User Fee: Other Immigration Services (Rehabilitation; Authorization to Return to Canada; Immigration Statistical Data; Certification and Replacement of Immigration Documents)
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: IRPA and IRPR
Date Last Modified: Various
Performance Standards:
Applications Processed Overseas: Authorizations to Return to Canada (ARCs) are processed expeditiously but no meaningful service standard can be established because ARC cases are extremely variable in nature and complexity. The need for an ARC is usually identified during the processing of any type of visa application.
Certification and Replacement of Immigration Documents: Clients can obtain a certified true copy or a replacement copy of most documents issued by Canadian immigration authorities that have been lost, stolen or destroyed. Requests for certified copies of expired immigration documents are sent to the Query Response Centre via a local CIC. Clients may also request changes to and obtain a replacement of certain current, valid immigration documents. Recent processing times are updated frequently on the CIC website.
Performance Results:
Applications Processed Overseas: ARCs are processed expeditiously but the variable nature and complexity of ARC cases means that there can be no meaningful performance results.
Certification and Replacement of Immigration Documents: Recent processing times are updated regularly on the CIC website.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
3,400 | 2,599 | 29,464 | 2011-12 | 3,400 | 29,464 |
2012-13 | 3,600 | 29,464 | |||
2013-14 | 3,900 | 29,464 |
8. User Fee: Right of Citizenship Fee
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: FAA; Citizenship Act; and Citizenship Regulations
Date Last Modified: 02-01-1997
Performance Standards: This fee is payable by persons obtaining citizenship status. Persons under 18 years of age do not pay the right of citizenship fee.
Performance Results: This fee is linked to acquisition of citizenship status. See Citizenship Fees for additional details. Recent processing times are updated frequently on the CIC website. In calendar year 2010, the national processing time for 80% of citizenship grants was within 19 months. In 2010, citizenship grants were processed for 153,644 persons.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
16,400 | 17,830 | Costs associated with this fee are related to the overall cost of the citizenship regulatory regime, estimated to exceed $16.4 million. | 2011-12 | 15,100 | Costs associated with this fee are related to the overall cost of the citizenship regulatory regime, estimated to exceed $16.4 million. |
2012-13 | 15,100 | ||||
2013-14 | 15,100 |
9. User Fee: Citizenship Fees: Grant, Retention, Resumption and Renunciation of Citizenship
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Citizenship Act and Citizenship Regulations
Date Last Modified: 02-01-1997
Performance Standards: Recent processing times are updated quarterly on the CIC website.
Performance Results: In calendar year 2010, the national processing time for 80% of citizenship grants was within 19 months and citizenship grants were processed for 153,644 persons.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
20,000 | 21,300 | 82,099 | 2011-12 | 18,300 | 82,099 |
2012-13 | 18,300 | 82,099 | |||
2013-14 | 18,300 | 82,099 |
10. User Fee: Citizenship Status Document Fees: Proof of Citizenship and Search for Record of Citizenship
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Citizenship Act and Citizenship Regulations
Date Last Modified: 02-01-1997
Performance Standards: Recent processing times are updated quarterly on the CIC website.
Performance Results: In calendar year 2010, the processing time for 80% of citizenship proofs was within nine months. Proof of citizenship processing times are updated regularly on the CIC website. In 2010, CIC issued 69,766 citizenship proofs.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
5,200 | 4,666 | 24,749 | 2011-12 | 5,200 | 24,749 |
2012-13 | 5,200 | 24,749 | |||
2013-14 | 5,200 | 24,749 |
11. User Fee: Fees for Processing Access Requests Filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA)
Fee Type: Other products and services
Fee-Setting Authority: ATIA
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension is to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. The ATIA website provides further details.
Performance Results: CIC received 18,862 requests under the ATIA in 2010–11 (not including 1,698 requests carried over from the previous year) and completed 18,070 requests during the same period. In 92% of the cases, CIC responded within the legislative timeframe.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
90 | 89 | 3,300 | 2011-12 | 100 | 3,600 |
2012-13 | 100 | 3,600 | |||
2013-14 | 100 | 3,600 |
Other Information: CIC has experienced significant increases in the number of ATIA requests it receives. Over the past three years, the number of requests has increased 34%, which has resulted in increased costs to process these requests. Source: Annual Report 2010–2011—Privacy Act, Access to Information Act.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Subtotal Regulatory | 477,800 | 476,269 | 845,711 | 2011-12 | 485,100 | 845,711 |
2012-13 | 501,200 | 845,711 | ||||
2013-14 | 518,600 | 845,711 | ||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services | 90 | 89 | 3,300 | 2011-12 | 100 | 3,600 |
2012-13 | 100 | 3,600 | ||||
2013-14 | 100 | 3,600 | ||||
Total | 477,890 | 476,358 | 849,011 | 2011-12 | 485,200 | 849,011 |
2012-13 | 501,300 | 849,011 | ||||
2013-14 | 518,700 | 849,011 |
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Right of Permanent Residence Fee (formerly Right of Landing Fee) |
This fee was established in Budget 1995 and subsequently reduced by half in Budget 2006. This fee is not a processing fee, but rather a fee that is paid to receive the right of permanent residence.Legally, this fee is only required to be paid prior to the time of the issuance of permanent resident (PR) visas abroad or prior to the granting of PR status in Canada. The timing of its payment is, to a certain degree, voluntary on the part of the applicant (i.e., at any time during the processing of the PR applications prior to the issuance of the PR visa at a visa office; prior to the finalization of the PR visa abroad; or prior to being granted PR status in Canada). Because the client determines when the fee is paid, no specific service standards are attached to it. Instead, the service standard and processing times are attached to the processing of the application itself, which carries a separate fee. See the Permanent Residence Application Fee, PRC Fee, Permanent Resident Travel Document Fee and Sponsorship Application Fee for Family Classes for additional details. |
This fee is closely linked to the processing of permanent residence applications in Canada and overseas. | |
Permanent Residence Application Fee, PRC Fee, Permanent Resident Travel Document Fee and Sponsorship Application Fee for Family Classes |
Priority processing is given to the reunification of immediate family members—spouses, partners and dependent children—and to federal skilled workers. With the implementation of the new Ministerial Instructions for federal skilled workers (the first set of Ministerial Instructions, issued November 28, 2008, were updated by a second set issued June 26, 2010), there is a new service standard. As of April 1, 2010, applications for immediate members of the family class (i.e., spouses, partners and children) are to be processed within 12 months from the time the application is received at CPC–Mississauga.
Permanent Resident Travel Documents processed overseas: Processed expeditiously.
Permanent Resident Cards: There are two types of clients for the PRC: new permanent residents who have never had a PRC and existing permanent residents renewing, replacing or requesting their first PRC. As of April 2010, PRCs for new clients are subject to a 40 business-day processing service standard. |
PR Visas Processed Overseas: In calendar year 2010, overseas missions exceeded the overall operational visa target by almost 2%, issuing a total of approximately 245,000 PR visas. Also in calendar year 2010, missions finalized 80% of immediate family class applications (spouses, partners and children) within 14 months. In April 2010, CIC implemented internal processing standards for file creation at overseas missions, in an attempt to meet the service standard in the future. The impact of these internal changes should reduce the processing time for this category in the coming months. As part of the commitments for the federal skilled worker applications accepted under the 2010 Ministerial Instructions, missions finalized 80% of these applications within 13 months. CIC’s website presents details of processing times for a 12-month period by each overseas mission and by immigration category. It shows the processing times for 80% of the cases and is updated quarterly. For data consistency, the website of every overseas mission links to pages concerning processing times on the CIC website. Permanent Residence Applications Processed in Canada: CPC–Vegreville and the in-Canada regions currently process applications for permanent residence for protected persons, live-in caregivers eligible to apply under the class, and members of the spouse and common-law partner in Canada class. At the end of calendar year 2010, the in-Canada processing time for permanent residence applications was within 21 months for 80% of live-in caregivers; within 16 months for 80% of protected persons in Canada; and within 19 months for spouses, partners and children. In 2010, CPC–Vegreville processed permanent residence applications for 7,812 live-in caregivers; 9,289 protected persons in Canada; and 5,391 spouses, partners and children. Recent processing times for CPCs are updated weekly on the CIC website. PRCs: Processing times for new applications were kept within the new 40-business-day service standard. In 2010–11, 79% of Phase I PRCs met this service standard. Permanent Resident Travel Documents Processed Overseas: In calendar year 2010, 80% of applications were processed within seven days. Sponsorship Application for Family Class Processed Abroad: CPC–Mississauga completes the assessment of sponsorship eligibility for members of the family class processed abroad. Priority processing is given to spouses, common-law and conjugal partners, and dependent children. At the end of calendar year 2010, the in-Canada processing time for family class sponsorship applications was within one month for 80% of spouses, partners and children and within 40 months for 80% of parents and grandparents. Orphans and adopted children are processed daily on a priority basis. In 2010, CPC–Mississauga processed family class sponsorship applications for 72,646 spouses, partners and children and for 23,874 parents and grandparents. Recent processing times for CPCs are updated weekly on the CIC website. |
All the current fees are subject to the Government of Canada regulatory process for cost-recovery fees, which includes consultation requirements. Consultations took place at the time each of them was imposed as part of the regulatory process. CIC consults regularly with stakeholders. Future changes to processing fees will be subject to the User Fees Act. Section 4 of the User Fees Act specifies the consultative requirements that will apply when new or modified user fees are considered. |
Work Permit Fee (Individuals and Performing Artist Groups) | Work Permits Processed Overseas and in Canada: Processed expeditiously. | Work Permits Processed Overseas: In calendar year 2010, 80% of applications were finalized within six weeks. The CIC website presents details of processing times for a 12-month rolling period for each
overseas mission. It shows the processing times for 80% of the cases finalized within the 12-month period and is updated quarterly. In 2010, work permits and extensions were processed overseas for 136,290 persons. Work Permits Processed in Canada: CPC–Vegreville processes work permit applications in various formats, including both paper and electronic applications. Recent processing times for CPCs are updated weekly on the CIC website. Work permits for those who are changing employers are prioritized, as applicants extending their permit with the same employer benefit from implied status, and may continue to work until a decision is rendered on their case, with certain conditions. At the end of calendar year 2010, the processing time for 80% of temporary foreign worker cases was within 11 weeks. In 2010, work permits and extensions were processed in Canada for 196,314 persons. |
See Permanent Residence Application Fee, PRC Fee, Permanent Resident Travel Document Fee and Sponsorship Application Fee for Family Classes for more information. |
Study Permit Fee |
Study Permits Processed Overseas and in Canada: Processed expeditiously. |
Study Permits Processed Overseas: In calendar year 2010, 80% of applications were processed within five weeks. The CIC website presents details of processing times for a 12-month rolling period for each overseas mission. It shows the processing times for 80% of the finalized cases and is updated quarterly. In 2010, study permits and extensions were issued overseas for 93,814 persons. Study Permits Processed in Canada: CPC–Vegreville processes study permit applications in various formats, including both paper and electronic applications. Recent processing times for CPCs are updated weekly on the CIC website. At the end of calendar year 2010, the processing time for 80% of temporary resident student cases was within eight weeks. In 2010, study permits and extensions were issued in Canada for 66,343 persons. |
See Permanent Residence Application Fee, PRC Fee, Permanent Resident Travel Document Fee and Sponsorship Application Fee for Family Classes for more information. |
Temporary Resident Visa (TRV) Application Fee, Extension of Authorization to Remain in Canada as a Temporary Resident Fee and Restoration of Temporary Resident Status Fee | TRVs: Processed expeditiously. |
TRVs: In calendar year 2010, 80% of TRV applications abroad were finalized within two weeks. The CIC website presents details of processing times for a 12-month rolling period for each overseas mission. It shows the processing times for 80% of the finalized cases and is updated quarterly. Extensions of Authorization to Remain in Canada as a Temporary Resident and Restoration of Temporary Resident Status: CPC–Vegreville processes extensions of authorization to remain in Canada as a temporary resident in various formats, including both paper and electronic applications. Recent processing times for CPCs are updated weekly on the CIC website. At the end of calendar year 2010, the in-Canada processing time for 80% of TRV cases was within 12 weeks.CIC issued 66,053 TRVs and extensions in Canada in 2010. Extensions of Authorization to Remain in Canada as a Temporary Resident: Recent processing times for CPCs are updated weekly on the CIC website. Restoration of Temporary Resident Status: These applications are submitted into various processing streams, including students, workers and visitors, depending on the status that the applicant needs to regain. They are processed according to the processing times of the stream under which they are applying, and thus there are no separate processing times available for these cases. |
See Permanent Residence Application Fee, PRC Fee, Permanent Resident Travel Document Fee and Sponsorship Application Fee for Family Classes for more information. |
Temporary Resident Permit (TRP) Fee |
TRPs Processed Overseas and in Canada: Processed expeditiously. Currently, there is no service standard for these cases due to the variability in the complexity of these cases and the inadmissibilities being addressed within each application. |
TRPs Processed Overseas: TRPs are processed to overcome an inadmissibility identified during the processing of any type of visa application. There are no data on processing times for TRPs abroad. They are processed expeditiously but the variability in the complexity of the cases and the inadmissibilities being addressed mean that no meaningful service standard can be established. TRPs Processed in-Canada: TRPs are received at CPC–Vegreville and may be referred to local CIC offices for processing. In calendar year 2010, 80% of TRP applications/extensions were processed within 15 months. |
See Permanent Residence Application Fee, PRC Fee, Permanent Resident Travel Document Fee and Sponsorship Application Fee for Family Classes for more information. |
Other Immigration Services (Rehabilitation; Authorization to Return to Canada; Immigration Statistical Data; Certification and Replacement of Immigration Documents) |
Applications Processed Overseas: Authorizations to Return to Canada (ARCs) are processed expeditiously but no meaningful performance standard can be established because ARC cases are extremely variable in nature and complexity. The need for an ARC is usually identified during the processing of any type of visa application. Certification and Replacement of Immigration Documents: Clients can obtain a certified true copy or a replacement copy of most documents issued by Canadian Immigration authorities that have been lost, stolen or destroyed. Requests for certified copies of expired immigration documents are sent to the Query Response Centre via a local CIC. Clients may also request changes to and obtain a replacement of certain current, valid immigration documents. Recent processing times are updated regularly on the CIC website. |
Applications Processed Overseas: ARCs are processed expeditiously but the variable nature and complexity of ARC cases means that there can be no meaningful performance results. Certification and Replacement of Immigration Documents: Recent processing times are updated regularly on the CIC website. |
See Permanent Residence Application Fee, PRC Fee, Permanent Resident Travel Document Fee and Sponsorship Application Fee for Family Classes for more information. |
Right of Citizenship Fee | This fee is payable by persons obtaining citizenship status. Persons under 18 years of age do not pay the Right of Citizenship fee. | This fee is linked to acquisition of citizenship status. See Citizenship Fees for additional details. Recent processing times are updated frequently on the CIC website. In calendar year 2010, the national processing time for 80% of citizenship grants was within 19 months. In 2010, citizenship grants were processed for 129,907 adults. | See Permanent Residence Application Fee, PRC Fee, Permanent Resident Travel Document Fee and Sponsorship Application Fee for Family Classes for more information. |
Citizenship Fees: Grant, Retention, Resumption and Renunciation of Citizenship |
Recent processing times are updated quarterly on the CIC website. | In calendar year 2010, the national processing time for 80% of citizenship grants was within 19 months and citizenship grants were processed for 153,644 persons. | See Permanent Residence Application Fee, PRC Fee, Permanent Resident Travel Document Fee and Sponsorship Application Fee for Family Classes for more information. |
Citizenship Status Document Fees: Proof of Citizenship and Search for Record of Citizenship |
Recent processing times are updated quarterly on the CIC website. | In calendar year 2010, the processing time for 80% of citizenship proofs was within nine months. Proof of citizenship processing times are updated regularly on the CIC website. In 2010, CIC issued 69,766 citizenship proofs. | See Permanent Residence Application Fee, PRC Fee, Permanent Resident Travel Document Fee and Sponsorship Application Fee for Family Classes for more information. |
Fees for Processing Access Requests Filed under the ATIA |
Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension is to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. The ATIA website provides further details. | CIC received 18,862 requests under the ATIA in 2010–11 (not including 1,698 requests carried over from the previous year) and completed 18,070 requests during the same period. In 92% of cases, CIC responded within the legislative timeframe. | The service standard is established by the ATIA and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments done in 1986 and 1992. |
Other Information: CIC has experienced significant increases in the number of ATIA requests it receives. Over the past three years, the number of requests has increased 34%, which has resulted in increased costs to process these requests. Source: Annual Report 2010–2011—Privacy Act, Access to Information Act.
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of requests filed under the Access to Information Act
Fee Type: Other Products and Services (O)
Fee-Setting Authority: Access to information Act
Date Last Modified: No modification has been made to the fee structure since the Act has been promulgated
Performance Standards: The Access to Information Act stipulates that requests must be answered within 30 days, unless extensions are warranted as per section 9 of the Act
Performance Results: In fiscal year 2010-2011, CSC received 604 formal requests under the Access to Information Act. Compliance rate for fiscal year 2010-2011 was 84%.
2010-2011 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
4.5 | 6.4 | 1,230 | 2011-12 | 6.4 | 1,250 |
2012-13 | 6.4 | 1,250 | |||
2013-14 | 6.4 | 1,250 |
Other Information: Access to Information requesters are contacted on a regular basis, as part of our Duty to Assist, and encouraged to reduce the scope of requests whenever additional fees are to be charged, for example, search fees on vague requests; search and preparation; photocopying fees where requests are voluminous.
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Fees charged for the processing of requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA) – Including application, search, and reproduction fees | Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request: the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. |
In fiscal year 2010-2011, CSC received 604 formal requests under the ATIA. Compliance rate for fiscal year 2010-2011 was 84%. |
The service standard is established by the ATIA and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments done in 1986 and 1992. |
Other Information: N/A
User Fee: The family Order and Agreements Enforcement Assistance (FOAEA)
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: FOAEA Act
Date Last Modified: March 1999
Performance Standards: Yes
Performance Results: Results are available in table "External Fees"
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
7,200 | 7,371 | 3,102 | 2011-12 | 7,300 | 2,644 |
2012-13 | 7,300 | 2,610 | |||
2013-14 | 7,300 | 2,621 |
User Fee: The Central Divorce Proceedings
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: CRDP Fee Order
Date Last Modified: May 1986
Performance Standards: Yes
Performance Results: Results are available in table "External Fees"
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
800 | 720 | 898 | 2011-12 | 738 | 995 |
2012-13 | 738 | 995 | |||
2013-14 | 738 | 995 |
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA)
Fee Type: Other product and services
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act (ATIA)
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Yes
Performance Results: Results are available in table "External Fees"
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
3 | 6 | 1,842 | 2011-12 | 3 | 2,334 |
2012-13 | 2 | 2,775 | |||
2013-14 | 2 | 3,243 |
Other Information: Full cost reflects the cost of the Access to Information and Privacy (ATIP) Office in Justice. The role of the ATIP Office is to respond to all formal requests that are made to the Department of Justice, in accordance with the Access to Information Act. As other central agencies, the DOJ ATIP Office has an expanded role; in addition to processing requests, the Office responds to consultations from other government institutions regarding solicitor-client information for the Government as a whole. Although the User Fees Act may provide some of the performance indicators, fee waiver must be considered in light of the ATIP legislation.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Subtotal Regulatory | 8,000 | 8,091 | 4,000 | 2011-12 | 8,038 | 3,638 |
2012-13 | 8,038 | 3,604 | ||||
2013-14 | 8,038 | 3,616 | ||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services | 3 | 6 | 1,842 | 2011-12 | 3 | 2,334 |
2012-13 | 2 | 2,775 | ||||
2013-14 | 2 | 3,243 | ||||
Total | 8,003 | 8,097 | 5,842 | 2011-12 | 8,041 | 5,972 |
2012-13 | 8,040 | 6,379 | ||||
2013-14 | 8,040 | 6,859 |
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
The family Order and Agreements Enforcement Assistance (FOAEA) | 1. Garnishment applications under Part II of the Act will be in effect 35 days after receipt. | 72,026 new garnishment applications accepted within the time frame. Standard met at 100%. |
Informal feedback and general day-to-day interactions with clients and stakeholders, including provincial and territorial maintenance and enforcement programs, courts, creditors and other federal government partners, indicate a high level of satisfaction with the services provided under both the Family Orders and Agreement Enforcement Assistance and Central Registry of Divorce Proceedings programs. A client satisfaction survey was launched in January 2005 to provide a more formal assessment of client satisfaction with service standards, levels and accessibility. Findings indicate strong levels of satisfaction. |
2. Public enquiries are to be responded to within 48 hours. | A total of 84,587 calls were received | ||
The Central Divorce Proceedings | 1. Clearance Certificates are to be issued within 3 weeks of receipt of the application. | Standard met at 90%. | A client satisfaction survey was launched in January 2005 to provide a more formal assessment of client satisfaction with service standards, levels and accessibility. Findings indicate strong levels of satisfaction. |
2. Divorce information is to be provided to Statistics Canada annually, according to schedule. | Standard met at 100%. | ||
3. All telephone enquiries are to be responded to within 24 hours and all written enquiries are to be responded to within five business days. | Approximately 100 to 150 daily telephone enquiries and written enquiries were received and standard was met at 90%. | ||
4. Quarterly invoices and compensation reports are to be issued within 30 days. | Standard met at 100%. | ||
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA) |
Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. The Access to Information Act provides fuller details: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/A-1 |
Standard met at 95.7%. | The service standard is established by the Access to Information Act and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments done in 1986 and 1992. |
User Fee: Fees may be charged under the Access to Information Act. Where applicable, other fees may also be charged for reproduction, alternative format, research, preparation, production and programming.
Fee Type: Other products and services
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act and Regulations
Date Last Modified: March 2011
Performance Standards: The person responsible in the organization is responsible for conveying in whole or in part the documents requested, within 30 days following receipt of the access to information request. Pursuant to section 9 of the Act, the response time may be extended; notice of extension must then be sent. Further details on the Access to Information Act can be found at: Department of Justice Web site.
Performance Results: In 2010-2011, the Agency responded to 83% of requests within
30 days following their receipt.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Planned Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Planned Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
0.2 | 0.08 | 117.6 | 2011-12 | 0.1 | 177.6 |
2012-13 | 0.1 | 173.0 | |||
2013-14 | 0.1 | 176.9 |
Other Information: The Agency follows Treasury Board Secretariat guidelines with regard to imposing and waiving access fees. For example, it waives the collection of fees of less than $25. For amounts exceeding $25, the Agency decides whether to collect fees in whole or in part, based on an assessment of public interest.
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Fees charged for processing access requests submitted to the Agency under the Access to Information Act | Under the Act, a response to an access to information request must be provided within 30 days following receipt of the request. Pursuant to section 9 of the Act, the response time may be extended in certain situations; notice of extension must then be sent to the applicant within 30 days after receipt of the request. Further details on the Access to Information Act can be found at Department of Justice website. |
In 2010-2011, 15 requests (83%) were processed within 30 days. Two requests (11%) were processed in 31-60 days. One of the two requests was the subject of an extension of which the applicant was notified. One request (6%) was processed in 61-120 days and was the subject of an extension. |
No consultation, since the Regulations and the Access to Information Act establish the service standards. |
User Fee: Access to Information Act (ATIA)
Fee Type: O
Fee-Setting Authority: Access to Information Act, subsection 11(1) and paragraph 77(1)(d); Access to Information Regulations
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: A response is provided within 30 calendar days following the receipt of a request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. A notice of extension must be sent within 30 days after the receipt of the request. The Access to Information Act provides further details: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/A-1/index.html
Performance Results: Environment Canada received 1128 requests in 2010-2011 and processed 1171 requests, including some carried over from the previous year. One hundred and seventy two (172) requests were carried over to 2011-2012.
2010-11 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
8.5 | 11.8 | 1,105.5 | 2011-12 | 9.5 | 1,100.00 |
2012-13 | 10.0 | 1,200.00 | |||
2013-14 | 10.5 | 1,300.00 |
User Fee: Cap Tourmente National Wildlife Area – NWA Admission Fees
Fee Type: R
Fee-Setting Authority: Canada Wildlife Act, s. 12, Wildlife Area Regulations
Date Last Modified: 2003
Performance Standards: Environment Canada strives to meet visitor needs by delivering quality services and providing access to safe and properly maintained facilities. Visitors also have access to bilingual reception and interpretative services provided by experienced and qualified personnel to help them learn more about the Cap Tourmente Wildlife Area and wildlife conservation.
Performance Results: Feedback from a number of visitors shows that they are generally satisfied with the services offered and the quality of facility maintenance.
2010-11 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
155.0 | 162.7 | 386.0 | 2011-12 | 155.0 | 386.0 |
2012-13 | 175.0 | 388.0 | |||
2013-14 | 175.0 | 390.0 |
Other Information: Rising oil prices have had an impact on fixed maintenance and operating costs for the Cap Tourmente Wildlife Area. Group reservations for the Cap Tourmente summer day camps for children have been on an upward trend. There are plans to amend the regulations in 2012-2013 to increase NWA admission fees, which will generate approximately $175,000 in annual income. If this increase is not granted, revenues for 2012 to 2014 will be in the order of 155,000 (same level as 2010-2011), in which case NWA operating and maintenance costs will far exceed generated income.
User Fee: Cap Tourmente National Wildlife Area – Hunting Permits
Fee Type: R
Fee-Setting Authority: Canada Wildlife Act, s. 12, Wildlife Area Regulations
Date Last Modified: 2001
Performance Standards: During the fall hunting season at the Cap Tourmente NWA, Environment Canada strives to meet hunter needs and ensure they enjoy their hunting experience by providing qualified and experienced support personnel, quality services, and access to safe and properly maintained facilities.
Performance Results: According to a survey of permit holders conducted in 2005, hunters were very satisfied with the quality of facility maintenance. In addition, several hunters register every year for the Cap Tourmente hunting program, which is a good indicator of their satisfaction with the services provided.
2010-11 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
55.0 | 50.6 | 85.0 | 2011-12 | 45.0 | 85.0 |
2012-13 | 55.0 | 85.0 | |||
2013-14 | 55.0 | 85.0 |
Other Information: Income is expected to drop in 2011-2012 as compared to previous years due to the elimination of the spring hunting season. In addition, registration fees for the fall 2011 hunting season were deposited in 2010-2011.
User Fee: Migratory Bird Program – Migratory Game Bird Hunting Permit
Fee Type: R
Fee-Setting Authority: Migratory Bird Convention Act, 1994, s. 12; Migratory Bird Regulations C.R.C., c.1035
Date Last Modified: 1998 – SOR/98-314
Performance Standards: Migratory game bird hunting permits are sold for $8.50 and wildlife habitat conservation stamps are sold for $8.50 for a total cost of $17.00 (permit holders are required to affix the stamp to the permit to validate it). They are available as of August 1st at Canada Post offices and from select provincial and private vendors. The performance standard is to ensure that an adequate number of permits is available for distribution as of this date for the duration of the hunting season in each province.
Permits validated with the wildlife habitat conservation stamp are mandatory for migratory game bird hunting. Hunters or their representatives must go to the vendor’s location in person to purchase their migratory game bird hunting permits. Customers receive quality services from permit vendors. They receive their permits a few minutes after completing the transaction.
There are currently no talks underway to increase permit prices.
Performance Results: Migratory game bird hunting permits were available within the prescribed time period to meet hunter demand. All migratory game bird hunting permits were issued within a few minutes after purchase. Canada Post modified the distribution process to ensure adequate distribution to all points of sale.
2010-11 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
1,600.0 | 1,231.0 | 960.0 | 2011-12 | 1,200.0 | 960.0 |
2012-13 | 1,200.0 | 960.0 | |||
2013-14 | 1,200.0 | 960.0 |
User Fee: Migratory Bird Program – Wildlife Habitat Conservation Stamp
Fee Type: R
Fee-Setting Authority: Migratory Bird Convention Act, 1994, s. 12; Migratory Bird Regulations
Date Last Modified: 1991
Performance Standards: The retail value of wildlife habitat conservation stamps (unsigned booklets) is $8.50 per stamp. The performance standard is to ensure that an adequate number of single stamps is available for migratory game bird hunting permits and that a certain number of wildlife habitat conservation stamps is available for distribution by Canada Post and vendors selected by Wildlife Habitat Canada (WHC).
Collectors can purchase wildlife habitat conservation stamps at Canada Post outlets and from Wildlife Habitat Canada and selected vendors by email, phone, and fax (there is a two-week handling period). The price of wildlife habitat conservation stamps ranges from $8.50 for a single stamp to $136.00 for a sheet of 16 stamps; booklets signed by the artist are also available for $20.00. There are currently no talks underway to increase the price of wildlife habitat conservation stamps.
Performance Results: At the beginning of the 2010 fiscal year, a sufficient number of wildlife habitat conservation stamps was available to meet purchase and migratory game bird hunting permit requirements. Customers were able to purchase wildlife habitat conservation stamps from Canada Post outlets, or by mail, phone, and fax. Stamps were made available to customers within the prescribed two-week handling period. Wildlife habitat conservation stamp purchases made through Wildlife Habitat Canada and selected vendors in person, by phone, or by mail were also processed within the prescribed two-week handling period. No complaints were received concerning the availability of stamps.
2010-11 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
1,900.0 | 1,080.0 | 960.0 | 2011-12 | 1,100.0 | 960.0 |
2012-13 | 1,100.0 | 960.0 | |||
2013-14 | 1,100.0 | 960.0 |
User Fee: Disposal at Sea Permit Application Fee
Fee Type: R
Fee-Setting Authority: Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA 1999), ss. 135(1); Disposal at Sea Regulations
Date Last Modified: 2001
Performance Standards: Under the application fee, each application is reviewed according to Schedule 6 of CEPA 1999 and the Disposal at Sea Regulations. This involves public notice, an application that provides detailed data, scientific review and payment of fees. Each permit is published in the Canada Gazette and issued to permit holder within 120 days of applying if the application is complete and there are no issues from other stakeholders.
Performance Results: Met service standard of permit issuance within 120 days of receipt of a complete application on 85% of delivered permits. Service standard was not met on permits that involved dredging or disposal in newly designated killer whale critical habitat. These permits required extra time to coordinate with DFO and ensure that disposal operations would not destroy critical habitat.
For further details see www.ec.gc.ca/seadisposal/.
2010-11 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
200.0 | 220.0 | 1,021.0 | 2011-12 | 200.0 | 1,021.0 |
2012-13 | 200.0 | 1,021.0 | |||
2013-14 | 200.0 | 1,021.0 |
User Fee: Disposal at Sea Permit Fee
Fee Type: R
Fee-Setting Authority: Financial Administration Act (FAA), par. 19.1(a); Disposal at Sea Permit Fee Regulations
Date Last Modified: 2010
Performance Standards: The permittee has access to a permitted site and the ability to dispose of 1000 m3 of dredged or excavated material for each $470 paid. The collected revenue is used by the Disposal at Sea Program to operate a representative national disposal site monitoring program that allows the client group as a whole to continue to have access to suitable disposal sites and to demonstrate that the resource is used sustainably for the Canadian public.
Performance Results: Met the service standards. Permittees disposed of dredged and excavated material authorized by their permits. Representative monitoring was carried out in accordance with monitoring guidelines.
For further details see www.ec.gc.ca/seadisposal/.
2010-11 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
1,300.0* | 543.1* | 1,228.4 | 2011-12 | 1,000.0 | 1,100.0 |
2012-13 | 1,100.0 | 1,100.0 | |||
2013-14 | 1,200.0 | 1,100.0 |
*The variation between the forecasted revenue and the actual revenue was largely due to the designation of Killer Whale Critical habitat on the west coast that caused a difficulty and delay in issuing permits. As a result the program had to refund some of the money as the permits were not delivered in time to use them, and some permit applications were never received as a result of the ongoing difficulties.
The revenue associated to this user fee is variable and difficult to estimate in advance due to the following: Dredging/disposal is cyclical and vary from year to year; small client base with a few clients with very large volume and the permits which are refundable, at any time, for the unused part.
User Fee: Aviculture and Taxidermy
Fee Type: R
Fee-Setting Authority: Migratory Bird Convention Act, 1994, s. 12; Migratory Bird Regulations
Date Last Modified: Prior to 1978
Performance Standards: These permits are issued by Environment Canada regional offices for a fee of $10.00 each after reviewing applications from the public. To be successful, applicants must meet certain requirements; for example, with respect to aviculture, a person must demonstrate that they will wing-clip/pinion or keep the birds in an enclosure to prevent mixing with wild populations. Each region can attach specific conditions to each permit. Permits generally expire on December 31 of the year issued. The performance standard is to review all applications received and issue permits, or notify applicants of the reasons for denying a permit, within 30 days of receiving the application.
Performance Results: All applications were processed within the 30-day timeframe unless site inspections were required. In those cases (10% of all applications), an additional 30–60 days were required to process the application.
2010-11 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
N/A | 12.4 | 34.0 | 2011-12 | 12.9 | 34.0 |
2012-13 | 12.7 | 34.0 | |||
2013-14 | 12.6 | 34.0 |
User Fee: New Substances Notification Regulations
Fee Type: R
Fee-Setting Authority: New Substances Fees Regulations
Date Last Modified: June 2010
Performance Standards: All notifications are reviewed and decisions taken within the prescribed time frames. Requests are acknowledged by letter, email or fax within 10 business days of receipt.
Performance Results: All new substances notifications are processed and decisions taken within the legislative time period. Requests made by letter, email or fax are responded to 95% of the time within 10 days.
2010-11 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
350.0 | 417.0 | 3,700.0 | 2011-12 | 350.0 | 3,700.0 |
2012-13 | 350.0 | 3,700.0 | |||
2013-14 | 350.0 | 3,700.0 |
Other Information: Note that the actual revenues are shared between EC (2/3) and HC (1/3) (In 2010-2011 EC kept $263,508 and HC received $131,754)
2010-11 | Planning Years | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Subtotal Regulatory | 5,560.0 | 3,716.8 | 8,374.4 | 2011-12 | 4,062.9 | 8,246.0 |
2012-13 | 4,192.7 | 8,248.0 | ||||
2013-14 | 4,292.6 | 8,250.0 | ||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services | 8.5 | 11.8 | 1,105.5 | 2011-12 | 9.5 | 1,100.0 |
2012-13 | 10.0 | 1,200.0 | ||||
2013-14 | 10.5 | 1,300.0 | ||||
Total | 5,568.5 | 3,728.6 | 9,479.9 | 2011-12 | 4,072.4 | 9,346.0 |
2012-13 | 4,202.7 | 9,448.0 | ||||
2013-14 | 4,303.1 | 9,550.0 |
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA) | A response is to be provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. A notice of extension must be sent within 30 days after receipt of the request. The Access to Information Act provides further details: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/A-1/index.html. |
Environment Canada received 1128 requests in 2010-2011 and processed 1171 requests, including some carried over from the previous year. One hundred and seventy two (172) requests were carried over to 2011-2012. | The service standard is established by the Access to Information Act and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat for amendments made in 1986 and 1992. |
Cap Tourmente National Wildlife Area – Admission Fees | Environment Canada strives to meet visitor needs by delivering quality services and providing access to safe and properly maintained facilities. Visitors also have access to bilingual reception and interpretative services provided by experienced and qualified personnel to help them learn more about the Cap Tourmente Wildlife Area and wildlife conservation. | Feedback from a number of visitors shows that they are generally satisfied with the services offered and the quality of facility maintenance. | No consultations are planned for 2011-2012. |
Cap Tourmente National Wildlife Area – Permit Sales | In order to meet hunter needs during the hunting season at Cap Tourmente and ensure they enjoy their stay enough to come again, Environment Canada strives to make sure they have access to properly maintained facilities such as attractive trails, pleasant eating areas geared to hunters, and sufficient parking spaces and bathrooms. | According to a survey of permit holders conducted in 2005, hunters were very satisfied with the quality of facility maintenance. | No consultations are planned for 2011-2012. |
Disposal at Sea Permit Application Fees | Under the application fee, each application will be reviewed according to Schedule 6 of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA 1999) and the Disposal at Sea Regulations. This involves public notice, application that provides detailed data, scientific review and payment of fees. Each permit will be published in the Canada Gazette and issued to the permit holder within 120 days of applying if the application is complete and there are no issues from other stakeholders. | Met service standard of permit issuance within 120 days of receipt of a complete application on 85% of issued permits. Service standard was not met on permits that involved dredging or disposal in newly designated killer whale critical habitat. These permits required extra time to coordinate with DFO and ensure that disposal operations would not destroy critical habitat. Advice was provided to applicants to assist timely permit reviews. | Application fees set in 1993 were rolled over in 2001. Regulatory Impact Assessment Statements and multi-stakeholder consultations were conducted before each regulation was enacted. The last review was conducted in 2003 and its report concluded that no change to fees was required. All consultations between 1993 and 2003 involved discussion papers,
public meetings and final reports. For further details see www.ec.gc.ca/iem-das |
Disposal at Sea Permit Fees | The permit holder has access to a permitted site and is permitted to dispose of 1000 m3 of dredged or excavated material for each $470 paid. The collected revenue is used by the Disposal at Sea Program to operate a representative national disposal site monitoring program that allows the client group as a whole to continue to have access to suitable disposal sites and to demonstrate that the resource is used sustainably for the Canadian public. | Met the service standards. Permit holders disposed of dredged and excavated material as authorized by their permits. Representative monitoring was carried out in accordance with monitoring guidelines. | Multi-stakeholder consultations were carried out from 1996 to 1998 for setting the permit fee. There was general acceptance for the fee, but there was some concern for how it would be set. Permit holders indicated that they preferred a proportional volume-based fee. As well, Environment Canada committed to regular meetings with permit holders,
reporting, and to review the fee three years after implementation. The review was conducted in 2003 and its report concluded that no change to the fee was required. Further consultations were undertaken between 1993 and 2003 involving discussion papers, public meetings and final reports. For further details see www.ec.gc.ca/iem-das. |
Migratory Bird Program – Migratory Game Bird Hunting Permit | Migratory game bird hunting permits are sold for $17.00. They are available as of August 1st at Canada Post offices and from select provincial and private vendors. The performance standard is to ensure that an adequate number of permits is available for distribution as of this date for the duration of the hunting season in each province. Permits validated with the wildlife habitat conservation stamp are mandatory for migratory game bird hunting. Hunters or their representatives must go to the vendor’s location in person to purchase their migratory game bird hunting permits. Customers receive quality services from hunting permit vendors. They receive their permits a few minutes after completing the transaction. There are currently no talks underway to increase permit prices. |
Migratory game bird hunting permits were available within the prescribed time period to meet hunter demand. All migratory game bird hunting permits were issued within a few minutes after purchase. Canada Post modified the distribution of migratory game bird hunting permits to ensure adequate distribution to all points of sale. | There have been no recent consultations. Income from the sale of migratory game bird hunting permits is deposited directly into the Consolidated Revenue Fund. No consultations are planned for 2011-2012. |
Migratory Bird Program – Wildlife Habitat Conservation Stamp | The retail value of wildlife habitat conservation stamps is $8.50 per stamp. The performance standard is to ensure that an adequate number of single stamps is available for migratory game bird hunting permits and that a certain number of wildlife habitat conservation stamps is available for distribution by Canada Post and vendors selected by Wildlife
Habitat Canada (WHC). Collectors can purchase wildlife habitat conservation stamps at Canada Post outlets and from Wildlife Habitat Canada and selected vendors by email, phone, and fax (there is a two-week handling period). The price of wildlife habitat conservation stamps ranges from $8.50 for a single stamp to $136.00 for a sheet of 16 stamps; booklets signed by the artist are also available for $20.00. There are currently no talks underway to increase the price of wildlife habitat conservation stamps. |
At the beginning of the 2010 fiscal year, a sufficient number of wildlife habitat conservation stamps was available to meet purchase and migratory game bird hunting permit requirements. Customers were able to purchase wildlife habitat conservation stamps from Canada Post outlets, or by mail, phone, and fax. Stamps were made available to customers within the prescribed two-week processing period. Wildlife habitat conservation stamp purchases made through Wildlife Habitat Canada and selected vendors in person, by phone, or by mail were also processed within the prescribed two-week handling period. No complaints were received concerning the availability of stamps. | No consultations are planned for 2011-2012. |
Migratory Bird Program - Avicultural Permits, Taxidermist Permits, and Eiderdown Permits | These permits are issued by Environment Canada's regional offices at a cost of $10 per unit following a review of applications and renewal requests received from the public. Applicants must meet certain criteria to be eligible. For instance, aviculture applicants must demonstrate that they will keep the birds in an enclosure and clip their wings to prevent them from mixing with wild populations. Each region can attach specific conditions to each permit. Permits generally expire on December 31 of the year in which they were issued. The performance standard is to review all incoming applications and to either issue a permit or advise the applicant of the reason his application was denied within 30 days of receipt. | All applications were processed within the prescribed 30-day time frame, unless site inspections were required. In these cases (10% of all applications), an additional 30 to 60 days were required to process the applications. As these inspections are under the purview of the Environmental Enforcement Directorate, processing time depends entirely on the officers’ workloads. | Since revenues and costs are negligible and as no complaints were received, there are currently no plans to hold consultations. |
New Substance Notification | All notifications are reviewed and all decisions are taken within the prescribed time frame. Requests are acknowledged by mail, e-mail, or fax within 10 business days of receipt. | All new substance notifications were processed and all decisions were taken within the legislated time period. Responses to 95% of requests received by mail, email, or fax were sent within 10 days. | Amendments to the New Substances Notifications Regulations were published in Canada Gazette Part II in September 2005. The Charter and Service Standards were updated and published in 2006 as part of the Service Delivery Improvement Initiative of the New Substances Division. In addition, a notifier survey designed in 2004 was implemented to determine areas for improvement in the Program. A second notifier survey for the New Substances Program was conducted in the 2009-2010 fiscal year. Results from both surveys will be used as a benchmark for the Program's improvement initiatives. |
Haying & Grazing (CWS Agricultural Activity) | A standing request list - “Notice of Interest” - is searched to identify applicants interested in the activity e.g., haying, grazing, crop. If no interest is shown then a call for applications is made through ads in local papers or other suitable means. Interested persons are asked to fill out a Canadian Wildlife Service (CWS) agricultural activity application form. Application forms are reviewed to determine the most suitable candidate and a reference check of the candidate(s) is conducted. The current CWS agricultural permit application form was developed in 1984 and based on the Saskatchewan Environment & Resource Management and Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food permit process. It was revised in 1988 in response to drought conditions. Permits are issued for a period of less than one year and expire on December 31st of the year issued. The fee structure for haying and grazing is based upon the current rates used by Saskatchewan Environment and Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food to ensure “equal service for equal fee” between departments is achieved. | Federal lands are monitored to ensure permit conditions are being met and habitat management goals (e.g., maintain native plant community and habitat for wildlife and reduce weed and exotic species invasion) are achieved through the activity. If so, the permit will be granted in subsequent years (subject to annual review). | The most suitable applicant is contacted to confirm their interest in obtaining a permit. Discussions are held to ensure the applicant understands and agrees to all conditions that will be on the permit. It is also ensured that the applicant understands the permit is only for one season, and that if any conditions of the permit are not followed, the permit may be immediately revoked by the Minister. Prospective grazing patrons must also submit a grazing plan which is reviewed and refined if required. Changes are reviewed with the patron to make sure they understand and agree with final grazing plan and permit conditions. |
Entry Fees: Biosphère (Montréal). Entrance fees (including tax) are: Adult: $12, Students (18 years old and older): $8. Ecoological House visits only $2. Youth (17 years old and under): Free (does not apply to organized groups) | Throughout the year, visitors to the Biosphère have access to visitor services and interpretation services in the exhibition halls, guided activities on various environmental subjects, and educational workshops designed especially for groups, as well as maintained facilities (exhibition halls, rest areas, lookouts, parking, etc.) | According to visitors’ written comments, which are gathered daily, and evaluation sheets completed by group leaders, a majority of visitors were very satisfied with their individual or group visit experience, and with the other services. | When a group visits, the group leader (e.g., the teacher) must complete an assessment of the services received. For visits by individuals, a sample survey will be conducted in 2011-2012. |
Publications | Most publications are provided free of charge. They are available in the Environment Canada online catalogue in various formats (print, HTML, PDF).Publications (free or sold) are promoted through various vehicles and tools, including the Environment Canada online catalogue, conferences, trade fairs, promotional flyers and the Canada Gazette. Clients
include departments, corporations and institutions, as well as the public. Orders are received online via an ordering site, or by phone, email and fax. Requests are generally processed in the order in which they are received, and an order tracking system is in place. Orders are also categorized by priority, with those involving legal statutes, ministerial enquiries and rush orders being
treated as high priorities. Turn-around time for individual orders (packaging and shipping) is within three to five working days. Packaging and shipping is carried out at a dedicated facility (Distribution Centre, 171 Jean-Proux, Gatineau QC K1A 0H3). Items are shipped by Canada Post for the most part, unless the client chooses alternative means, in which instance the Department fully recovers the associated costs. In addition to sending publications out by mail, publications are also distributed through government libraries, electronic distribution, and conferences. From 1991 to 2011, some publications were sold. The practice of selling some publications to recover the printing costs, as opposed to distributing publications at no cost, was implemented for very scientific non-mandatory reports aimed at targeted audiences. This was to avoid large orders from people who would not benefit from the specialized content. The rationale was that the public would be more careful about the quantity ordered if payment were required for the publication. |
The online ordering set-up has a built-in tracking system. For audit purposes, all supporting documentation for sold publications (purchase orders, requests, etc.) is attached to the invoice. Most items were prepaid, with the exception of purchases by other government departments and Canadian companies that are set up for purchase orders. For
international orders, Environment Canada asks for prepayment before shipping the items, to prevent having to recover small amounts at year end. The only delays experienced in the past involved reprinting. The online order tracking system allows Environment Canada staff to view the orders; post invoices, work order and shipping information; and to chronologically list all correspondence with the client. Items are categorized as PENDING, PROCESSING and COMPLETED, and are viewed daily to make sure that all orders are completed in a timely fashion. In 2010-2011, Communications Branch has initiated a strategic review and a cost analysis of its publications service; as a result, Environment Canada abolished the services of selling publications. As of April 1, 2011, all publications are available at no cost, but limited the number of publications to be ordered. Few publications were sold from April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011 as EC phased out the cancellation of this service. |
All publications promote our 1-800 number to voice concerns and complaints. |
On March 31, 2004, Parliament gave legal effect to the User Fees Act with the aim of strengthening the elements of accountability, oversight, and transparency in the management of user fee activities. The User Fees Act requires departments to annually submit to Parliament a list of all user fees in effect, irrespective of when the fees were established.
The table below lists DFO's user fees for which revenues were collected during the fiscal year 2010-11. Since the establishment of the User Fees Act, DFO has not introduced any new user fees, nor has the Department increased any existing user fees.
DFO collects fees for the conferring of Rights and Privileges (Regulatory - R) and for Other Goods and Services (O).
Note: Performance standards under the User Fees Act must be established as part of a user fee proposal process, with specific provisions outlining how the standards are to be established. DFO has not introduced new user fees, nor introduced amendments to existing ones that would require a user fee proposal under the Act; and has no such information to report. Information on DFO's service standards for current fees and performance results can be found in the table on External Fees.
Description: Intended to recover from commercial vessels the total direct costs incurred by CCG to manage maintenance dredging services in the St. Lawrence Shipping Channel. Services provided consist of the management of the maintenance dredging program for the St. Lawrence Shipping Channel.
Fee Type: O
Fee-setting Authority: Section 47 of the Oceans Act
Date Last Modified: 2003
1 Since 1997, and at the request of industry, the Canadian Coast Guard has managed the maintenance dredging of the navigation channel of the St. Lawrence River between the Port of Montreal and the Île aux Coudres near Quebec City. The current fee schedule, which replaces the earlier fee schedule that expired on March 31, 2003, extends the arrangement whereby the Canadian Coast Guard is reimbursed, via fees, for the total direct costs it incurs to ensure commercial navigation. Full cost figures are based on total direct costs (rather than full costs), which include direct labour costs (including employee benefits), direct operating costs, direct material costs, program support costs, and capital acquisitions (to the extent that these capital acquisitions form part of an output).
2010-11 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
4,600 | 5,667 | — | 2011-12 | 4,600 | — |
2012-13 | 4,600 | — | |||
2013-14 | 4,600 | — |
Description: Intended to recover a portion of the full costs incurred by CCG to provide marine navigation services to commercial vessels. Services provided include short-range aids to navigation and vessel traffic services.
Fee Type: O
Fee-setting Authority: Section 47 of the Oceans Act
Date Last Modified: 2005
2010-11 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
27,718 | 27,649 | — | 2011-12 | 27,818 | — |
2012-13 | 27,818 | — | |||
2013-14 | 27,818 | — |
Description: Rates charged for person-to-person communications by radio-telephone or radio-telegram from ship to shore or from shore to ship.
Fee Type: O
Fee-setting Authority: Section 19 of the Financial Administration Act
Date Last Modified: 1994
2010-11 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
75 | 16 | — | 2011-12 | 44 | — |
2012-13 | 44 | — | |||
2013-14 | 44 | — |
Description: Intended to recover a portion of the full costs incurred by CCG to provide icebreaking services to commercial vessels. Services provided include route assistance (channel maintenance and ship escorts), ice routing and information services, and some harbour/wharf breakouts where not provided by commercial operators.
Fee Type: O
Fee-setting Authority: Section 47 of the Oceans Act
Date Last Modified: 1998
2010-11 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
13,781 | 4,590 | — | 2011-12 | 13,781 | — |
2012-13 | 13,781 | — | |||
2013-14 | 13,781 | — |
Description: Sale of charts and publications
Fee Type: O
Fee-setting Authority: Financial Administration Act, Oceans Act
Date Last Modified: 1996
2010-11 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
1,400 | 1,541 | — | 2011-12 | 1,400 | — |
2012-13 | 1,400 | — | |||
2013-14 | 1,400 | — |
Description: Commercial fishing licence fees
Fee Type: R
Fee-setting Authority: Sections 7 and 8 of the Fisheries Act
Date Last Modified: 1995
2010-11 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
34,515 | 33,815 | — | 2011-12 | 32,450 | — |
2012-13 | 32,250 | — | |||
2013-14 | 32,050 | — |
Description: Recreational fishing license fees
Fee Type: R
Fee-setting Authority: Sections 7 and 8 of the Fisheries Act
Date Last Modified: 1996
2010-11 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
4,300 | 5,287 | — | 2011-12 | 5,746 | — |
2012-13 | 5,300 | — | |||
2013-14 | 5,200 | — |
Description: Pacific Salmon Conservation Stamp
Fee Type: R, O
Fee-setting Authority: Sections 7 and 8 of the Fisheries Act
Date Last Modified: 1995
2010-11 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
1,049 | 1,304 | — | 2011-12 | 1,400 | — |
2012-13 | 1,350 | — | |||
2013-14 | 1,200 | — |
Description: Fees charged for the processing of Access requests filed under the Access to Information Act.
Fee Type: O
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: 1992
2010-11 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
13 | 13 | — | 2011-12 | — | — |
2012-13 | — | — | |||
2013-14 | — | — |
2010-11 | Planning Years | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Subtotal Regulatory | 47,587 | 39,476 | — | 2011-12 | 39,596 | — |
2012-13 | 38,900 | — | ||||
2013-14 | 38,450 | — | ||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services | 39,864 | 40,405 | — | 2011-12 | 47,643 | — |
2012-13 | 47,643 | — | ||||
2013-14 | 47,643 | — | ||||
Total | 87,451 | 79,881 | — | 2011-12 | 87,239 | — |
2012-13 | 86,543 | — | ||||
2013-14 | 86,093 | — |
User Fee: Access to Information Act fees
Fee Type: Other Products and Services
Fee-setting Authority: Section 11 of the Access to Information Act (ATIA) and section 7 of the Access to Information Regulations
Date Last Modified: Section 11 (ATIA) was last modified in 1992 (C-2, s.2).
Performance Standards: Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request.
The Access to Information Act (http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/A-1/) provides fuller details.
Performance Results: The statutory deadlines were met 68.5% of the time in 2010-11; this is a significant (20%) improvement over last year, when the deadlines were met 45.9% of the time.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
10 | 6 | 3,852 | 2011-12 | 10 | 5,876 |
2012-13 | 10 | 5,876 | |||
2013-14 | 10 | 5,876 |
Other Information: N/A
User Fee: Any national of a foreign state who applies to enter Canada under the International Experience Canada (IEC) program shall, if the application is approved, pay a participation fee of $150.
Fee Type: Regulatory—Program Participation Fee
Fee-setting Authority: Order JUS-609929 amending the Order-in-Council P.C. 2000-1723 of November 30, 2000, made pursuant to paragraph 19(1)(b) of the Financial Administration Act
Date Last Modified: October 3, 2007
Performance Standards: All complete IEC applications that are received at Canadian missions in participating countries are processed within eight weeks.
Performance Results: 92.7% of complete applications were processed within eight weeks from January 1st to December 31st 2010.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
10,100 | 8,071 | 7,288 | 2011-12 | 13,000 | 10,000 |
2012-13 | 14,000 | 11,000 | |||
2013-14 | 15,000 | 12,000 |
Other Information: Please note that the discrepancy between the “Revenue” and “Full Cost” columns is due to a program timeline that each year produces an influx of around $2 million in the middle of the month of March. This money is transferred to the next fiscal year, which causes the difference between the “Revenue” and the “Full Cost” columns every year. This $2 million is essential to program operations and is used to reimburse the over-programming costs at the beginning of each fiscal year.
User Fee: Fees for the issuance of export and import certificates and permits
Fee Type: Other products and services
Fee-setting Authority: Export and Import Permits Act and Export and Import Permits and Certificates Fees Order
Date Last Modified: May 19, 1995
Performance Standards: Deliver non-routed import and export permits within 15 minutes of the time of application; process within four business hours permit applications that are automatically redirected (routed) to departmental officers or that have been flagged for an officer's review by the applicant when no additional information or documentation is required.
Performance Results: 99% success rate on the processing of over 510,000 applications in fiscal year 2010–11.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
6,400 | 6,760 | 7,100 | 2011-12* | 2,400 | 7,100 |
2012-13* | 2,400 | 7,100 | |||
2013-14* | 2,400 | 7,100 |
Other Information: * Projected decreased revenues partly based on a revised monitoring program for steel imports.
User Fee: Consular Service Fee
Fee Type: Other products and services
Fee-setting Authority: Consular Service Fee Regulations pursuant to the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Act
Date Last Modified: The Consular Service Fee was introduced on November 8, 1995, and has not been modified.
Performance Standards: Consular Services performance standards are grouped under the following service standards categories:
For more information, please go to www.voyage.gc.ca/about_a-propos/standards-services-normes-eng.asp.
Consular services are provided to Canadians 24 hours a day, seven days a week, at more than 260 points of service around the world. Outside regular business hours, calls are forwarded to the Emergency Watch and Response Centre in Ottawa. Emergency situations are dealt with immediately.
Every effort is made to obtain solutions for specific problems and to provide the required service. However, the department's ability to do so and its success are conditioned, in many instances, by the laws and regulations of other countries as well as the quality and level of cooperation offered by persons and organizations outside the Government of Canada.
Performance Results: Of the 5,723 Canadians who completed a Client Feedback Form in 2010–11, fully 95% said they were satisfied or very satisfied with the services received. The department also reports on performance against passport, citizenship and arrest/detention service standards. This information for 2010–11 is noted below.
Canada's missions abroad are asked to make regular contact with long-term Canadian detainees. The frequency of contact reflects local conditions: once every three months (e.g. in much of Latin America, Africa and Asia), once every six months (e.g. in much of Western Europe) or once every 12 months (e.g. in the United States, where close to 75% of these detainees are located). As of March 31, 2011, missions met this standard 92% of the time.
Missions are asked to report on their ability to accept, review and forward citizenship applications to Canada within the 10-day service standard. During 2010–11, they did so successfully with 90% of the applications.
Missions are monitored on their ability to meet the 15-day service standard for passport issuance. They met this standard 82% of the time.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
95,200 | 88,800 | 94,000* | 2011-12 | 95,900 | 95,600 |
2012-13 | 100,900 | 97,200 | |||
2013-14 | 99,500 | 98,800 |
Other Information:
User Fee: Specialized Consular Services Fee
Fee Type: Other products and services
Fee-setting Authority: Consular Fee (Specialized Services) Regulations, pursuant to paragraph 19 (1)(a) of the Financial Administration Act
Date Last Modified: June 3, 2010
Performance Standards: Specialized Consular Services performance standards are grouped under the following service standards categories:
For the complete service standards list, please go to www.voyage.gc.ca/about_a-propos/standards-services-normes-eng.asp.
Performance Results: Client feedback from 403 clients of legal and notary services demonstrated an overall satisfaction level of 88%.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
3,600 | 3,600 | 3,800* | 2011-12 | 3,700 | 3,800 |
2012-13 | 3,700 | 3,900 | |||
2013-14 | 3,700 | 4,000 |
Other Information:
User Fee: Passport Canada
Fee Type: Other products and services
Fee-setting Authority: Passport service fees regulation
Date Last Modified: December 10, 2001
Performance Standards: The standard turnaround times in working days are:
Performance Results: The agency issued 4,422,206 passports in 2010–11 and met its service commitments to Canadians in all areas of operations at a rate of 99.47% overall. Specifically, 99.40% of applications submitted by mail were processed within 20 working days, 99.49% of applications submitted in person were processed within 10 working days, and 99.60% of applications submitted through receiving agents were processed within 20 working days.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
289,567 | 269,541 | 290,686 | 2011-12 | 283,697 | 329,121 |
2012-13 | 298,568 | 382,568 | |||
2013-14 | 294,457 | 294,457 |
Other Information: N/A
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Subtotal Regulatory | 299,667 | 277,612 | 297,974 | 2011-12 | 296,697 | 339,121 |
2012-13 | 312,568 | 393,568 | ||||
2013-14 | 309,457 | 306,457 | ||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services | 105,210 | 99,166 | 108,752 | 2011-12 | 102,010 | 112,376 |
2012-13 | 107,010 | 114,076 | ||||
2013-14 | 105,610 | 115,776 | ||||
Total | 404,877 | 376,778 | 406,726 | 2011-12 | 398,707 | 451,497 |
2012-13 | 419,578 | 507,644 | ||||
2013-14 | 415,067 | 422,233 |
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA) pursuant to the Access to Information Regulations. |
Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. The Access to Information Act provides fuller details: (http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/A-1/). The Office of the Information Commissioner has, in the past, considered a performance rate of 85% as standard and 80% as failure. |
Statutory deadlines met 68.5% of the time. |
The service standard is established by the Access to Information Act and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments done in 1986 and 1992. |
Any national of a foreign state who applies to enter Canada under an international youth program shall, if the application is approved, pay a fee of $150. |
Complete IEC applications that are received at Canadian missions in participating countries are processed within eight weeks. |
92.7% of complete applications were processed within eight weeks from January 1 to December 31, 2010. |
Consultations for the implementation of fees included direct communications and interviews conducted by Ipsos Reid with 25 stakeholders, including non-governmental organizations, DFAIT, Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC), missions abroad and foreign government stakeholders. Overall stakeholder reaction was positive. |
Fees for the issuance of export and import certificates and permits |
Deliver non-routed import and export permits within 15 minutes of the time of application; process within four business hours permit applications that are automatically redirected (routed) to departmental officers or that have been flagged for an officer's review by the applicant when no additional information or documentation is required. |
99% success rate on the processing of over 510,000 applications in fiscal year 2010–11. |
Stakeholder surveys were conducted with a few client groups in 2010–11. Similar surveys will continue to be used in 2011–12. In addition, the department has ongoing consultative bodies to provide input on behalf of stakeholders with respect to certain trade controls, as well as regular outreach and specific consultations with associations and companies with respect to export controls for strategic goods. |
Consular Services Fee |
Consular services are based on written service standards (established in 1995), which detail the services to be provided, along with qualitative and quantitative standards to be used by employees. The service standards are available at www.voyage.gc.ca/about_a-propos/standards-services-normes-eng.asp as well as at all missions abroad, where they are either in public view or can be provided by employees. Consular services are provided to Canadians 24 hours a day, seven days a week, at more than 260 points of service around the world. Outside regular business hours, calls are forwarded to the Emergency Operations Centre in Ottawa. Emergency situations are dealt with immediately. |
See Performance Results above. |
The consular service standards were developed following consultations with Canadians at approximately 80 missions around the world as well as with selected clients in Canada. Surveys were also conducted at the international airports in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver. |
Specialized Consular Services Fee |
These standards are available at www.voyage.gc.ca/about_a-propos/standards-services-normes-eng.asp and at all Canadian missions abroad. Clients are invited to comment if they did not receive the level of service they expected or if they wish to make suggestions. |
Client feedback from 403 clients of legal and notary services demonstrated an overall satisfaction level 88%. |
The consular service standards were developed following consultations with Canadians at approximately 80 missions around the world as well as with selected clients in Canada. Surveys were also conducted at the international airports in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver. |
Canada Revolving Fund |
The standard turnaround times in working days are:
|
In 2010–11, 99.40% of applications submitted by mail were processed within 20 working days, 99.49% of applications submitted in person were processed within 10 working days, and 99.60% of applications submitted through receiving agents were processed within 20 working days. |
N/A |
Other Information:
User Fee: Confidential business information exemption fee
Fee Type: Regulatory (R)
Fee-setting Authority: Hazardous Materials Information Review Act
Date Last Modified: June 2002
Performance Standards: Complete pre-registration check and register claims within seven days of receipt, provided all necessary information is included
Performance Results: 100%
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
570 | 485 | 6,066 1 | 2011-12 | 570 | 4,535 |
2012-13 | 570 | 4,535 | |||
2013-14 | 570 | 4,535 |
1 The full cost and estimated full cost associated with user fees and regulatory charges have been revised to reflect current Treasury Board Secretariat guidelines.
User Fee: Fees charged for processing of access requested filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA)
Fee Type: Other Products and Services (O)
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request
Performance Results: 100%
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
- | 0.015 | 2 | 2011-12 | - | - |
2012-13 | - | - | |||
2013-14 | - | - |
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Subtotal Regulatory | 570 | 485 | 6,066 | 2011-12 | 570 | 4,535 |
2012-13 | 570 | 4,535 | ||||
2013-14 | 570 | 4,535 | ||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services | - | 0.015 | 2 | 2011-12 | - | - |
2012-13 | - | - | ||||
2013-14 | - | - | ||||
Total | 570 | 485.015 | 6,068 | 2011-12 | 570 | 4,535 |
2012-13 | 570 | 4,535 | ||||
2013-14 | 570 | 4,535 |
(1) Full costs reflect actual expenditures in a given year and do not take into account additional costs needed to address existing and prevent future backlogs for 2010/11.
User Fee: Authority to Sell Drugs Fees
Fee Type: Regulatory (R)
Fee-setting Authority: Financial Administration Act (FAA)
Date Last Modified: Dec.1994
Performance Standards: 120 calendar days to update the Drug Product Database following notification
Performance Results: 100% within 120 calendar days
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
$7,700 | $7,615 | $47,205 (1) | 2011-12 | $8,553 | $53,095 |
2012-13 | $8,724 | $56,760 | |||
2013-14 | $8,899 | $57,896 |
Other Information:
User Fee: Drug Establishment Licensing Fees
Fee Type: Regulatory (R)
Fee-setting Authority: Financial Administration Act (FAA)
Date Last Modified: Dec. 1997
Performance Standards: 250 calendar days to issue / renew licence
Performance Results: 97.4% within 250 calendar days
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
$6,000 | $7,875 | $20,297 (1) | 2011-12 | $21,901 | $26,080 |
2012-13 | $22,339 | $26,601 | |||
2013-14 | $22,786 | $27,133 |
Other Information:
User Fee: Drug Submission Evaluation Fees (Pharmaceuticals & Biologic Products)
Fee Type: Regulatory (R)
Fee-setting Authority: Financial Administration Act (FAA)
Date Last Modified: Aug. 1995
Performance Standards: Review 1 (average time in calendar days)
Pharmaceuticals
NDS: Priority NAS = 180
NDS: NAS = 300
NDS: Clin only = 300
NDS: Clin/C&M = 300
NDS: Priority Clin/C&M = 180
NDS: Labelling only = 60
NDS: Comp/C&M = 180
ANDS: C&M/Labelling = 180
ANDS: Comp/C&M = 180
SNDS: Clin/C&M = 300
SNDS: Clin only = 300
SNDS: Comp/C&M = 180
SNDS: C&M/Labelling = 180
SNDS: Rx to OTC New INDIC = 300
SNDS: Rx to OTC No New Indication =180
SNDS: Labelling only = 60
SNDS-C: Clin only =300
SANDS: Clin only = 300
SANDS: Comp/C&M = 180
SANDS: C&M/Labelling = 180
SANDS: Labelling only = 60
DIN A with data = 210
DIN A form only = 180
DIN D with data = 210
DIN D form only = 180
Biologics
NDS: Priority NAS = 180
NDS: NAS = 300
NDS: Clin/C&M = 300
ANDS: Comp/C&M =180
SNDS: Priority Clin only = 180
SNDS: Clin/C&M = 300
SNDS: Clin only = 300
SNDS: Comp/C&M = 180
SNDS: C&M/Labelling = 180
SNDS: Labelling only = 60
SNDS: NOC-C Clin only = 200
DIN B with data = 210
DIN B form only = 180
Performance Results: Review 1 (average time in calendar days)
Pharmaceuticals
NDS: Priority NAS = 169
NDS: NAS = 310
NDS: Clin only = 295
NDS: Clin/C&M = 316
NDS: Priority Clin/C&M = 180
NDS: Labelling only = 50
NDS: Comp/C&M = 325
ANDS: C&M/Labelling = 307
ANDS: Comp/C&M = 385
SNDS: Clin/C&M = 347
SNDS: Clin only = 270
SNDS: Comp/C&M = 233
SNDS: C&M/Labelling = 235
SNDS: Rx to OTC New INDIC = NA
SNDS: Rx to OTC No New Indication =NA
SNDS: Labelling only = 64
SNDS-C: Clin only =277
SANDS: Clin only = 343
SANDS: Comp/C&M = 301
SANDS: C&M/Labelling = 332
SANDS: Labelling only = 53
DIN A with data = 396
DIN A form only = 213
DIN D with data = 147
DIN D form only = 111
Biologics
NDS: Priority NAS = 175
NDS: NAS = 274
NDS: Clin/C&M = 302
ANDS: Comp/C&M = N/A
SNDS: Priority Clin only = 187
SNDS: Clin/C&M = 291
SNDS: Clin only = 257
SNDS: Comp/C&M = 180
SNDS: C&M/Labelling = 167
SNDS: Labelling only = 37
SNDS: NOC-C Clin only = 250
DIN B with data = 94
DIN B form only = 90
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
$23,000 | $22,657 | $79,367 (1) | 2011-12 | $40,870 | $87,157 |
2012-13 | $50,060 | $93,319 | |||
2013-14 | $51,061 | $95,185 |
Other Information:
User Fee: Medical Device Licence Application Fees
Fee Type: Regulatory (R)
Fee-setting Authority: Financial Administration Act (FAA)
Date Last Modified: Aug.1998
Performance Standards: Review time to first decision (calendar days)
Review 1 (average time in calendar days)
Class II = 15
Class II amendment = 15
Class II Private Label = 15
Class II Private Label amendment = 15
Class III = 60
Class III amendment = 60
Class IV = 75
Class IV amendment = 75
Performance Results: Average review time to first decision
Review 1 (average time in calendar days)
Class II = 14.7
Class II amendment = 10.25
Class II Private Label = 15.95
Class II Private Label amendment = 13.28
Class III = 69.64
Class III amendment = 66.47
Class IV = 104.84
Class IV amendment = 61.29
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
$3,800 | $4,025 | $11,684 (1) | 2011-12 | $9,425 | $14,864 |
2012-13 | $9,613 | $16,266 | |||
2013-14 | $9,805 | $16,591 |
Other Information:
User Fee: Fees for Right to Sell a Licensed Medical Device
Fee Type: Regulatory (R)
Fee-setting Authority: Financial Administration Act (FAA)
Date Last Modified: Aug.1998
Performance Standards: 20 calendar days from deadline for receipt of annual notification to update the Medical Devices Active License Listing (MDALL) database
Performance Results: 100% within 20 calendar days
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
$1,800 | $2,662 | $7,378 (1) | 2011-12 | $8,377 | $10,927 |
2012-13 | $8,545 | $12,408 | |||
2013-14 | $8,715 | $12,656 |
Other Information:
User Fee: Medical Device Establishment Licensing Fees
Fee Type: Regulatory (R)
Fee-setting Authority: Financial Administration Act (FAA)
Date Last Modified: Jan. 2000
Performance Standards: 120 calendar days to issue / renew licence
Performance Results: 99.5% issued within 120 calendar days
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
$3,000 | $4,115 | $6,089 (1) | 2011-12 | $11,992 | $13,505 |
2012-13 | $12,232 | $13,775 | |||
2013-14 | $12,477 | $14,051 |
Other Information:
User Fee: Veterinary Drug Evaluation Fees
Fee Type: Regulatory (R)
Fee-setting Authority: Financial Administration Act (FAA)
Date Last Modified: Mar. 1996
Performance Standards: Review time to first decision (calendar days)
NDS (including Priority Review) = 300
ABNDS = 300
SNDS = 240
SABNDS = 240
Admin = 90
DIN (including changes to DINs) = 120
NC = 90
ESC = 60
Labels = 45
Emergency Drug Release = 2
Performance Results: Average review time to first decision
NDS (including Priority Review) = 290
ABNDS = 303
SNDS = 261
SABNDS = 242
Admin = 121
DIN (including changes to DINs) = 128
NC = 131
ESC = 67
Labels = 55
Emergency Drug Release = 1
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
$650 | $719 | $9,783 (1) | 2011-12 | $739 | $10,057 |
2012-13 | $760 | $10,338 | |||
2013-14 | $781 | $10,628 |
Other Information:
User Fee: Fees to be paid for Pest Control Product Application Examination Service
Fee Type: Regulatory (R)
Fee-setting Authority: Pest Control Products Act (PCPA)
Date Last Modified: April 1997
Performance Standards: Target is 90% of submissions in all categories to be processed within time shown.
www.pmra-arla.gc.ca/english/pdf/pro/pro9601-e.pdf
Category A
Standard - 550 days
User Request Minor Use Registration (URMUR) - 365 days
Category B
Standard/priority - 365 days
Category C
Standard - 180 or 225 days
Category D
IMEP - 32 days
OUI - 56 days
URMULE - 60 days and
Master Copy - 21 days Category E
New Active - Food - 365 days
New Active - Non-food - 165 days
Performance Results:
Category A = 82% overall while100% of joint reviews were completed with established international standards.
Category B = 80% overall for the fiscal year.
Category C = 74%
Category D = 87%
Category E = 31%
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
$3,490 | $5,073.1 | $40,821 | 2011-12 | $3,490 | $36,611 |
2012-13 | $3,490 | $36,611 | |||
2013-14 | $3,490 | $36,611 |
Other Information:
User Fee: Fees to be paid for the right or privilege to manufacture or sell a pest control product in Canada and for establishing a Maximum Residue Limit in relation to a pest control product.
Fee Type:
Fee-setting Authority: Financial Administration Act (FAA)
Date Last Modified: April 1997
Performance Standards: 100% of all fees for the right or privilege to manufacture or sell a pest control product in Canada are invoiced by April 30th of each fiscal year.
Performance Results: 100% of all invoices were issued by April 30, 2010.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
$4,500 | $4,428 | $29,318 | 2011-12 | $4,500 | $26,294 |
2012-13 | $4,500 | $26,294 | |||
2013-14 | $4,500 | $26,294 |
Other Information:
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA)
Fee Type: Other products and services (O)
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. ATIA: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/A-1/218072.html
Performance Results: During fiscal year 2010-2011, Health Canada completed processing 1535 (71%) of 2147 active requests.
Health Canada was able to respond within 30 days or less in 700 (45.6%) of completed cases. * The remaining requests were completed within 31 to 60 days in 171 (11.1%) cases, 61 to 120 days in 178 (11.6%) cases and 486 or more days in 486 (31.7%) cases.
*A Notice of Extension is sent to the requester within 30 days of receipt of request.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
$10 | $15.5 | $2,340 | 2011-12 | $10 | $1,800 |
2012-13 | $10 | $1,800 | |||
2013-14 | $10 | $1,800 |
Other Information:
Please note that according to prevailing legal opinion, where the corresponding fee introduction or most recent modification occurred prior to March 31, 2004:
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Subtotal Regulatory | $53,940 | $59,169 | $251,942 | 2011-12 | $109,847 | $278,590 |
2012-13 | $120,263 | $292,372 | ||||
2013-14 | $122,514 | $297,045 | ||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services | $10 | $15.5 | $2,340 | 2011-12 | $10 | $1,800 |
2012-13 | $10 | $1,800 | ||||
2013-14 | $10 | $1,800 | ||||
Total | $53,950 | $59,184.5 | $254,282 | 2011-12 | $109,857 | $280,390 |
2012-13 | $120,273 | $294,172 | ||||
2013-14 | $122,524 | $298,845 |
* Denotes fees set by contract.
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Authority to Sell Drugs Fees | 120 calendar days to update the Drug Product Database following notification | 100% within 120 calendar days | In April 2010, Health Canada's Proposal to update current user fees for regulatory activities related to human drugs and medical devices was tabled in Parliament, as required by the User Fees Act. The Senate Standing Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology undertook the review of the proposal, and recommended to the
Senate that the proposal be approved with no changes. On May 26, 2010, the Senate adopted the report of its Committee, thereby concluding the Parliamentary review of Health Canada's Proposal. As user fees are set in regulations, any changes to update them are required to go through the Canada Gazette process. The regulatory proposal was published in the Canada Gazette, Part I on November 13, 2010 for a 75-day consultation period. A summary of stakeholders' comments and Health Canada's responses was published in Canada Gazette, Part II, as part of the Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement that accompanied the regulations. The regulations containing updated user fees came into force on April 1, 2011 and will apply to 2011-2012 performance. The service standard for the Certificate of Pharmaceutical Product was revised and implemented in January of 2011. No further review is planned for the service standard. The non-regulatory user fees, Certificate of Pharmaceutical Product and Drug Master File, fees are being reviewed separately. |
* Certificates of Pharmaceutical Product (Drug Export) Fees | 5 working days to issue certificate 10 working days to issue certificate |
38.30% April to December within 5 working days 43% January to March and ongoing within 10 working days |
|
Drug Establishment Licensing Fees | 250 calendar days to issue / renew licence | 97.40% within 250 calendar days | |
* Drug Master File Fees | 30 calendar days | 100% within 30 calendar days upon receipt of a complete package for a new Drug Master File or Letter of Access | |
Drug Submission Evaluation Fees (Pharmaceuticals & Biologic Products) | Review 1 (average time in calendar days) Pharmaceuticals NDS: Priority NAS = 180 NDS: NAS = 300 NDS: Clin only = 300 NDS: Clin/C&M = 300 NDS: Priority Clin/C&M = 180 NDS: Labelling only = 60 NDS: Comp/C&M = 180 ANDS: C&M/Labelling = 180 ANDS: Comp/C&M = 180 SNDS: Clin/C&M = 300 SNDS: Clin only = 300 SNDS: Comp/C&M = 180 SNDS: C&M/Labelling = 180 SNDS: Rx to OTC New INDIC = 300 SNDS: Rx to OTC No New Indication =180 SNDS: Labelling only = 60 SNDS-C: Clin only =300 SANDS: Clin only = 300 SANDS: Comp/C&M = 180 SANDS: C&M/Labelling = 180 SANDS: Labelling only = 60 DIN A with data = 210 DIN A form only = 180 DIN D with data = 210 DIN D form only = 180 Biologics NDS: Priority NAS = 180 NDS: NAS = 300 NDS: Clin/C&M = 300 ANDS: Comp/C&M = 180 SNDS: Priority Clin only = 180 SNDS: Clin/C&M = 300 SNDS: Clin only = 300 SNDS: Comp/C&M = 180 SNDS: C&M/Labelling = 180 SNDS: Labelling only = 60 SNDS: NOC-C Clin only = 200 DIN B with data = 210 DIN B form only = 180 |
Review 1 (average time in calendar days) Pharmaceuticals NDS: Priority NAS = 169 NDS: NAS = 310 NDS: Clin only = 295 NDS: Clin/C&M = 316 NDS: Priority Clin/C&M = 180 NDS: Labelling only = 50 NDS: Comp/C&M = 325 ANDS: C&M/Labelling = 307 ANDS: Comp/C&M = 385 SNDS: Clin/C&M = 347 SNDS: Clin only = 270 SNDS: Comp/C&M = 233 SNDS: C&M/Labelling = 235 SNDS: Rx to OTC New INDIC = NA SNDS: Rx to OTC No New Indication =NA SNDS: Labelling only = 64 SNDS-C: Clin only =277 SANDS: Clin only = 343 SANDS: Comp/C&M = 301 SANDS: C&M/Labelling = 332 SANDS: Labelling only = 53 DIN A with data = 396 DIN A form only = 213 DIN D with data = 147 DIN D form only = 111 Biologics NDS: Priority NAS = 175 NDS: NAS = 274 NDS: Clin/C&M = 302 ANDS: Comp/C&M = N/A SNDS: Priority Clin only = 187 SNDS: Clin/C&M = 291 SNDS: Clin only = 257 SNDS: Comp/C&M = 180 SNDS: C&M/Labelling = 167 SNDS: Labelling only = 37 SNDS: NOC-C Clin only = 250 DIN B with data = 94 DIN B form only = 90 |
|
Medical Device Licence Application Fees | Review 1 (average time in calendar days) Class II = 15 Class II amendment = 15 Class II Private Label = 15 Class II Private Label amendment = 15 Class III = 60 Class III amendment = 60 Class IV = 75 Class IV amendment = 75 |
Review 1 (average time in calendar days) Class II = 14.7 Class II amendment = 10.25 Class II Private Label = 15.95 Class II Private Label amendment = 13.28 Class III = 69.64 Class III amendment = 66.47 Class IV = 104.84 Class IV amendment = 61.29 |
|
Fees for Right to Sell a Licensed Medical Device | 20 calendar days from deadline for receipt of annual notification to update the Medical Devices Active License Listing (MDALL) database | 100% within 20 calendar days | |
Medical Device Establishment Licensing Fees | 120 calendar days to issue / renew licence | 99.50% issued within 120 calendar days | |
Veterinary Drug Evaluation Fees | Review time to first decision (calendar days) NDS (including Priority Review) = 300 ABNDS = 300 SNDS = 240 SABNDS = 240 Admin = 90 DIN (including changes to DINs) = 120 NC = 90 ESC = 60 Labels = 45 Emergency Drug Release = 2 |
Review time to first decision (calendar days) NDS (including Priority Review) = 290 ABNDS = 303 SNDS = 261 SABNDS = 242 Admin = 121 DIN (including changes to DINs) = 128 NC = 131 ESC = 67 Labels = 55 Emergency Drug Release = 1 |
99.50% issued within 120 calendar days |
* National Dosimetry Services Product, Services and Fee Structure (NDS P, S&F) | Provide timely, responsive and reliable customer services to 95,000 workers in over 12,500 groups: i) Registration and inspections of incoming dosimeters within 48 hours ii) Exposures over regulatory limits reported within 24 hours iii) Dosimeters leave NDS premises 10-13 working days prior to exchange date iv) Message call backs (phone, e-mail) within 24 hours v) Updated account information within 48 hours vi) Additional request dosimeters shipped within 24 hours vii) Exposure Reports for regular service sent out within 10 days of dosimeter receipt |
Provided timely, responsive and reliable customer services to over 95,000 workers in 12,500 groups. The standards were met as follows: i) > 99% Registration & inspection of incoming dosimeters within 48 hours ii) 100% Exposures over regulatory limits reported within 24 hours iii)> 99% Dosimeters leave NDS premises 10-13 working days prior to exchange date iv) > 95 % Message call backs done within 24 hours. 87% of incoming calls answered immediately. v) > 90 % Account information updated within 48 hours vi) > 99% Additional request dosimeters shipped within 24 hours vii) 97% Exposure Reports sent out within 10 days of dosimeter receipt |
InLight dosimeters were issued to clients staring on Jan 1, 2011, marking the beginning of transition to this new dosimetry product.
These interactions allowed NDS to measure level of service satisfaction as well as insight into new requirements for products and services. The total number of complaints was 238, compared to 183 last year. The processing and update client accounts occurred within 2 days of contact. Clients feedback (both complimentary and critical) was addressed as required. Addressed 92 client concerns. Additional information on service was obtained during regular contact with the client and, as required, through exit questionnaires. On a basis of over 525,000 dosimeter readings in 2010-2011, NDS= satisfaction rate is more than 99% based on the ratio of complaints to results reported. |
* Ship Sanitation Certificate Services (Formerly known as Deratting Services) | Health Canada provides 7-day service in Standard Rate (Designated) Ports and all requests are responded to within 48 hours. | 694 Ship Sanitation Certificate Inspections were conducted in 2010-2011, out of which 72% (498/694) were conducted at Standard Rate Ports. All requests were responded to within 48 hours. |
There were no changes to the service standards in 2010-2011. |
* Cruise Ship Inspection Program | Periodic inspections completed a minimum of once per sailing season on ships in Canadian waters. Final reports submitted within 10 working days. Re-inspection on any ships with scores of less than 85%. Health Canada publishes scores obtained from the Cruise Ship Inspection Program at: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hl-vs/travel-voyage/general/ship-navire-eng.php |
73 Cruise Ship Inspections were conducted in 2010-2011. All final reports were submitted within 10 working days. 4% (3/73) Cruise Ships did not achieve scores of 85% but re-inspections were not conducted on 2 of the 3 ships as they left Canadian waters immediately after initial inspection. |
Cruise Ship Inspections are performed following procedures and protocols that have been published and distributed to clients. Minor changes were made to the Cruise Ship Administrative Guide; these were communicated to the Cruise Ship Industry. No concerns were raised by stakeholders. No changes were made to the fee schedule. Industry received a summary report on Health Canada activities in 2010-2011. |
* Common Carrier Inspection (e.g. trains, ferries, airports/airlines, seaports) |
a) Passenger Train - On Board
|
a) Passenger Train - On Board
|
Common Carrier Inspections are performed following procedures and protocols that have been published and distributed to clients. Industry received a summary report on Health Canada activities in 2010-2011. Updated inspection guidelines for passenger trains, ferries and flight kitchens were also distributed to conveyance partners. These guidelines were developed in consultation with industry stakeholders. |
* Medical Marihuana Dried marihuana ($5.00 / gram) Cannabis seeds ($20.00 / packet of 30 seeds) |
Dried marihuana Health Canada provides tested dried marihuana lots prior to distribution to authorized persons. Cannabis seeds Health Canada provides tested marihuana seed lots prior to distribution to authorized persons. Processing time Health Canada processing time for orders is 14 working days (from the time the order is received to the delivery of shipment to the recipient). |
Dried marihuana Test result requirements were met for all 18 lots released. Quality control test results are posted on Health Canada website. The number of pouches distributed was 12,331. The number of returned pouches was 135. Return rate due to product non-satisfaction was 0.56% Cannabis seeds Test result requirements were met for the two (2) lots distributed in the fiscal year. The number of seed packets distributed was 719.The number of returned seed packets for was 6. Return rate for this year was .01% (note that the return rate for seeds may not necessarily be due to non-satisfaction). Processing time was below service standard of 14 working days for the all of our shipment orders of dried marihuana (total 4,610 shipment orders) and Cannabis seeds (total 467 shipment orders). |
MMAD and MMPD staff engages with clients on a daily basis through Canada Enquiries Centre. Over the fiscal year 2010-2011, the Marihuana Medical Access Program received 24,037 calls. These interactions with the Program's clients allowed MMAD and MMPD to assess the level of client satisfaction. These interactions are documented using a centralized
electronic database. There were no changes to the service standards in 2010-2011. |
*Employee Assistance Services (EAS) (Fees are charged through contractual or formally-based agreements between HC and other departments, agencies and federally-regulated organizations.) Customers are billed by means of JV, IS transactions, invoice and cheques, etc. Services provided for fees includes:
No individual client or Canadian is being charged for these services. |
As per formal agreement, varies depending on customer organization's requirements, needs and EAS capacity to meet service levels. Service Standards include:
|
As per results from customer surveys, client satisfaction surveys, Bell telephone reports, and data collected from affiliate mental health professionals, EAS is meeting all of the service standards outlined in the contractual agreements.
|
i) Customers: Federal departments and agencies comprise the majority of EAS' customer base, and they are consulted on a regular basis. Utilization data is provided at least annually to each customer organization. Formal agreement to renew contractual or ILA/MOU-type agreements are completed every 1, 2 or 3 years. Customers are formally surveyed every two years, but contacts are communicated with regularly to ensure satisfaction and build customer relations. ii) Clients: EAS is the largest provider of Employee Assistance Programs to the public sector. EAS handled more that 15,000 cases last fiscal cycle, and provided over 45,000 hours of counselling sessions. Client satisfaction is one of the most key indicators of service quality. For each service delivered, clients are informed that their feedback regarding service quality is valuable and appreciated. iii) Affiliates: EAS's network of more than 750 affiliates ensures that EAS has the capacity to offer services across Canada within industry-standard timeframes. This network covers Canada from coast to coast; it forms an invaluable source of feedback regarding service provision with respect to the client base at large. iv) Legislating/Regulating Bodies: As a government entity, many of EAS practices and procedures regarding finance, human resources and operational management are prescribed by specific policies, regulations and/or laws. As such, EAS is accountable to these rules and must, at regular intervals, report on: the usage of funds; adherence to key legislation, such as Official Languages, Financial Administration Act, and Privacy Act. v) Staff: Retention of knowledgeable and experienced staff has become a recognized problem in much of the federal public service. EAS, however, has consistently demonstrated a significantly higher level of staff retention when compared with the department as a whole. |
Fees to be paid for Pest Control Product Application Examination Service | Target is 90% of submissions in all categories to be processed within time shown. www.pmra-arla.gc.ca/ english/ pdf/pro/ pro9601-e.pdf Category A Standard - 550 days User Request Minor Use Registration (URMUR) - 365 days Category B Standard/priority - 365 days Category C Standard - 180 or 225 days Category D IMEP - 32 days OUI - 56 days URMULE - 60 days and Master Copy - 21 days Category E New Active - Food - 365 days New Active - Non-food - 165 days |
Category A = 82% overall, and performance for global joint reviews was 100% Category B = 80% overall for the fiscal year. Category C = 74% Category D = 87% Category E = 31% |
Formal stakeholder consultations are normally tied to a comprehensive review of User Fees. In the fiscal year 2010-2011, there were no formal consultations as no user fee reviews took place. |
Fees to be paid for the right or privilege to manufacture or sell a pest control product in Canada and for establishing a Maximum Residue Limit in relation to a pest control product. | Target is 100% of all fees for the right or privilege to manufacture or sell a pest control product in Canada are invoiced by April 30th of each fiscal year. | Met performance target | Formal stakeholder consultations are normally tied to a comprehensive review of User Fees. In the fiscal year 2010-2011, there were no formal consultations as no user fee reviews took place. |
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA) Note (1) | Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. ATIA: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/A-1/218072.html |
During fiscal year 2010-2011, Health Canada completed processing 1535 (71%) of 2147 active requests. Health Canada was able to respond within 30 days or less in 700 (45.6%) of completed cases. *The remaining requests were completed within 31 to 60 days in 171 (11.1%) cases, 61 to 120 days in 178 (11.6%) cases and 486 or more days in 486 (31.7%)
cases. Note(1) A Notice of Extension is sent to the requester within 30 days of receipt of request. |
The service standard is established by the Access to Information Act and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments done in 1986 and 1992. |
Other Information: N/A
User Fee: Federal Workers' Compensation Service Fees for Administration
Fee Type: (O)1
Fee-setting Authority: Government Employees Compensation Act
Date Last Modified: September 1990
Performance Standards: 90% of claims processed to the appropriate provincial workers' compensation authority within 24 hours
Performance Results: 75%a
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
2,700 | 2,574 | 4,000 | 2011-12 | 2,700 | 4,100 |
2012-13 | 2,800 | 4,200 | |||
2013-14 | 2,900 | 4,300 |
Other Information:
1Regulatory (R) or Other Products and Services (O).
aThe total number of Government Employees Compensation Act (GECA) claims received has remained virtually the same for 2010-2011 in comparison to the previous fiscal year, and represents a change of less than 1%. In the case of GECA claims identified as having potential third party involvement, however, 80% of provincial jurisdictions experienced increases in the number of claims received. Collectively, this represents a sizeable national increase in the order of 19% of potential GECA third party claims over the same previous fiscal year, which could have contributed in delaying the 24-hour reporting target. Also, as of a few years ago, all identified GECA third party claims in some of our largest regions must now undergo an “election” by the claimant, and only once the election cycle is complete can an accident report be submitted to the proper provincial authority for adjudication; this newer method of claim processing would have contributed in further delaying the established 24-hour reporting target.
User Fee: Other Initiative - Labour Fire Protection Engineering Services Feesa
Fee Type: (O)1
Fee-setting Authority: Financial Administration Act
Date Last Modified: June 1993
Performance Standards: 90% of plan review completed within 21 calendar days or 15 working days
Performance Results: 94%
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
80 | 49 | 5,400 | 2011-12 | 20 | 5,500 |
2012-13 | - | - | |||
2013-14 | - | - |
Other Information:
1Regulatory (R) or Other Products and Services (O).
aThe Full Cost represents the total expenditures for Fire Protection Services program of which only a small portion is recoverable through user fees for the fire protection engineering service delivery to Crown Corporations. The provision of specialized fire protection services to Crown Corporations will not be continued after February 1, 2012.
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA)
Fee Type: (O)1
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of requesta
The Access to Information Act provides more detail:
http://lois-laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/A-1/page-1.html
Performance Results: 96%
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
5 | 5 | 859 | 2011-12 | 5 | 860 |
2012-13 | 5 | 860 | |||
2013-14 | 5 | 860 |
Other Information:
1Regulatory (R) or Other Products and Services (O).
aEven though the legislative deadline is 30 calendar days, extensions are allowed depending on the complexity of the request.
User Fee: Searches of the CPP and OAS data banks
Fee Type: (R)1
Fee-setting Authority: Department of Social Development Act, Section 19
Date Last Modified: 1998
Performance Standards: Searches completed within 10 working days from receipt of requesta
Performance Results: 34%b
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
243 | 268 | 268 | 2011-12 | 308 | 308 |
2012-13 | 354 | 354 | |||
2013-14 | 408 | 408 |
Other Information:
1Regulatory (R) or Other Products and Services (O).
aDepending on the volume of commercial search requests, the searches will be completed no later than 10 working days after receipt of the request.
bThe Department is taking steps to address this under-performance, which was due to lack of resources to respond to peak or large volume searches. A plan is being developed to address immediately the backlog in search requests. In the longer term, the appropriateness of the service standard and the resources required to administer the program efficiently will be assessed.
User Fee: Social Insurance Number Replacement Card Fee
Fee Type: (R)1
Fee-setting Authority: Financial Administration Act
Date Last Modified: 1988
Performance Standards: A replacement Social Insurance Number (SIN) card will be mailed within 5 business days from date of receipt of request
Performance Results: 91%
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
1,887 | 1,823 | 2,871 | 2011-12 | 1,756 | 2,854 |
2012-13 | 1,683 | 2,817 | |||
2013-14 | 1,612 | 2,781 |
Other Information:
1Regulatory (R) or Other Products and Services (O).
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Subtotal Regulatory | 2,130 | 2,091 | 3,139 | 2011-12 | 2,064 | 3,162 |
2012-13 | 2,037 | 3,171 | ||||
2013-14 | 2,020 | 3,189 | ||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services | 2,785 | 2,628 | 10,259 | 2011-12 | 2,725 | 10,460 |
2012-13 | 2,805 | 5,060 | ||||
2013-14 | 2,905 | 5,160 | ||||
Total | 4,915 | 4,719 | 13,398 | 2011-12 | 4,789 | 13,622 |
2012-13 | 4,842 | 8,231 | ||||
2013-14 | 4,925 | 8,349 |
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Federal Workers' Compensation Service Fees for Administration | 90% of claims processed to the appropriate provincial workers' compensation authority within 24 hours | 75% | The Service Fees cover expenses to administer the Crown Corporations' workers' compensation program and represent HRSDC salaries, non-salaries, accommodation costs, cost of capital and depreciation costs, which are charged and prorated based on each organization’s number of new claims. Clients have the opportunity to provide feedback on service standards at any time through the Labour Program regional offices and headquarters. |
Other Information: For fiscal 2010-2011, the percentage of Government Employees Compensation Act (GECA) claims processed within a 24-hour period to the appropriate workers' compensation authority is in the order of 75%, which represents a differential of 15 percentage points between this value and the established target rate of 90%. The total number of GECA claims received has remained virtually the same for 2010-2011 in comparison to the previous fiscal year, and represents a change of less than 1%. In the case of GECA claims identified as having potential third party involvement, however, 80% of provincial jurisdictions experienced increases in the number of claims received. Collectively, this represents a sizeable national increase in the order of 19% of potential GECA third party claims over the same previous fiscal year, which could have contributed in delaying the 24-hour reporting target.
Also, as of a few years ago, all identified GECA third party claims in some of our largest regions must now undergo an “election” by the claimant, and only once the election cycle is complete can an accident report be submitted to the proper provincial authority for adjudication; this newer method of claim processing would have contributed in further delaying the established 24-hour reporting target.
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Other Initiative - Labour Fire Protection Engineering Services Fees | 90% of plan review completed within 21 calendar days or 15 working days | 94% | The Labour Program recently reviewed all of its program areas and determined that the provision of specialized fire protection engineering services to Crown Corporations will not be continued due to program priorities and resource limitations. This will take effect starting February 1, 2012. |
Other Information:
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA) | Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. The Access to Information Act provides more detail: http://lois-laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/A-1/page-1.html. |
96% | The service standard is established by the Access to Information Act and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments done in 1986 and 1992. |
Other Information:
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Searches of the CPP and OAS data banks | Searches completed within 10 working days from receipt of request | 34% | A departmental study done in 2005 confirmed the maximum fee of $10 that is charged does not exceed the cost per search. Consultations with stakeholders would be undertaken prior to any proposed fee amendment. Additionally, a fee is negotiated if the numbers of requests are more than 1000 at a given time by one company. Clients have the opportunity to convey feedback on service standards via the Office of Client Satisfaction at any time. |
Other Information: The Department is taking steps to address this performance result. In the past the Division has used resources from other business lines to provide a surge capacity to respond to spikes in volumes of requests, or to respond to requests that include a large volume of searches. In 2010-2011, this surge capacity was not available for various reasons, including resourcing pressures across the organization, and a reorganization that changed the place of this function within the Directorate. The Division is developing a plan to address immediately the backlog in search requests, and a plan for the longer term to assess the appropriateness of the service standard and the resources required to administer the program most efficiently.
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Social Insurance Number Replacement Card Fee | 90% of Social Insurance Number (SIN) cards will be mailed within 5 business days from date of receipt of request | 91% | The fee for a replacement SIN card is prescribed in the Social Insurance Number Replacement Card Fees Order, 1988, made pursuant to the Financial Administration Act. A departmental review, completed in September 2007, confirmed the nominal fee of $10 that is charged does not exceed the cost of issuing a replacement card. Consultations with stakeholders would be undertaken prior to any proposed fee amendment. Clients have the opportunity to convey feedback on service standards via the Office of Client Satisfaction at any time. |
Other Information:
User Fee: Device Approval and Measurement Standard Certification
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Weights and Measures Act
Date Last Modified: 1993
Performance Standards:
a) Notice of Approval is issued between 30 and 120 calendar days depending on complexity of submission. Categories of approval submissions and associated performance targets are available on the Measurement Canada website.
b) Certificate of Calibration is issued within 60 calendar days.Performance Results:
a) Performance standard was met, on average, 89% of the time.
b) Performance standard was met, on average, 95% of the time.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
200 | 217 | 755 | 2011–12 | 220 | 765 |
2012–13 | 220 | 765 | |||
2013–14 | 220 | 765 |
User Fee: Device Inspection
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Weights and Measures Act
Date Last Modified: 1993
Performance Standards: Inspection performed within 10 calendar days of request.
Performance Results: Performance standard was met, on average, 85% of the time.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
200 | 161 | 560 | 2011–12 | 160 | 557 |
2012–13 | 160 | 557 | |||
2013–14 | 160 | 557 |
User Fee: Meter Approval and Measuring Apparatus Certification
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Weights and Measures Act
Date Last Modified: 1993
Performance Standards:
a) Certificate of Calibration is issued within 60 calendar days.
b) Notice of Approval is issued between 30 and 120 calendar days depending on complexity of submission. Categories of approval submissions and associated performance targets published as part of service standards.Performance Results:
a) Performance standard was met, on average, 95% of the time.
b) Performance standard was met, on average, 89% of the time.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
200 | 314 | 1,093 | 2011–12 | 300 | 1,044 |
2012–13 | 300 | 1,044 | |||
2013–14 | 300 | 1,044 |
User Fee: Meter Inspection
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Electricity and Gas Inspection Act
Date Last Modified: 1995
Performance Standards: Inspection performed within 10 calendar days of request.
Performance Results: Performance standard was met, on average, 85% of the time.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
85 | 95 | 331 | 2011–12 | 100 | 348 |
2012–13 | 150 | 522 | |||
2013–14 | 150 | 522 |
User Fee: Electricity and Gas Accreditation (initial and renewal)
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Electricity and Gas Inspection Act
Date Last Modified: 1995
Performance Standards: Accreditation is granted within 1 month of an audit that demonstrates the applicant has met all requirements.
Performance Results: Performance standard was met 100% of the time.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
115 | 60 | 209 | 2011–12 | 70 | 244 |
2012–13 | 70 | 244 | |||
2013–14 | 70 | 244 |
User Fee: Measurement Canada
Total
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
800 | 847 | 2,947 | 2011–12 | 850 | 2,957 |
2012–13 | 900 | 3,131 | |||
2013–14 | 900 | 3,131 |
Other Information:
Revenue generation is based on client demand for services. Measuring device and electricity and natural gas meter inspections (for which fees are prescribed by regulation) are increasingly performed by Measurement Canada authorized service providers.
User Fee: Registration Fee
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) and Rules
Date Last Modified: 2001
Performance Standards: Registration of new estates: 90% of the time within 2 days.
Performance Results: 99.98%
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
14,091 | 11,987 | 12,786 | 2011–12 | 28,036 | 36,111 |
2012–13 | 28,114 | 36,999 | |||
2013–14 | 28,114 | 36,999 |
User Fee: Superintendent Levy
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) and Rules
Date Last Modified: 2001
Performance Standards: Letters of comment: Issued 90% of the time within 21 business days of receipt of the Statement of Affairs.
Performance Results: 92.63%
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
26,649 | 30,021 | 32,098 | 2011–12 | 10,788 | 13,899 |
2012–13 | 10,844 | 14,272 | |||
2013–14 | 10,844 | 14,272 |
User Fee: Name Search Fee
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) and Rules
Date Last Modified: 2001
Performance Standards: Faxes answered within 24 hours.
Performance Results: 100%
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
2,800 | 2,929 | 3,131 | 2011–12 | 2,929 | 3,773 |
2012–13 | 2,929 | 3,854 | |||
2013–14 | 2,929 | 3,854 |
User Fee: Trustee Licence Fee
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) and Rules
Date Last Modified: 2001
Performance Standards:
No standard.
Annual fee is paid by a trustee in order to retain his/her licence. The licence is annulled if the fee is not paid.
Performance Results: Not applicable.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
1,045 | 1,031 | 1,102 | 2011–12 | 1,031 | 1,327 |
2012–13 | 1,031 | 1,358 | |||
2013–14 | 1,031 | 1,358 |
User Fee: Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy
Total
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
44,585 | 45,968 | 49,117 | 2011–12 | 42,783 | 55,110 |
2012–13 | 42,917 | 56,483 | |||
2013–14 | 42,917 | 56,483 |
User Fee: Corporations Canada has several product offerings including file articles of incorporation, letters patent, file articles of continuance, file statements of revocation of intent to dissolve, file annual returns and name searches.
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Canadian Business Corporations Act (CBCA) , Canada Corporations Act (CCA), Canada Cooperatives Act
Date Last Modified: No activity in 2010–11.
Most recent consultations were undertaken in 2000–01, when Corporations Canada introduced a reduction in the incorporation fee and annual return fee.Performance Standards:
Performance Standards 1: Internet:
CBCA incorporation applications received by 1:00 p.m. EST via e-commerce are processed by 5:00 p.m. EST.
Performance Standards 2: Visitors:
Clients who come to headquarters between 8:30 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. will receive one-hour, over-the-counter service.
Performance Standards 3: Batches:
Batches of 5 or more articles are processed within the same day if received before 8:00 a.m.
Performance Standards 4: CCA Part II incorporation applications are processed within 20 business days.
Performance Standards 5: CBCA annual returns are processed and available on the Corporations Canada website within 5 business days.
Performance Standards 6: CCA Part II annual summaries are processed and available on the Corporations Canada website within 20 business days.
Performance Standards 7: Amendments under the CBCA incorporation applications received by 1:00 p.m. EST via e-commerce are processed by 5:00 p.m. EST.
Performance Standards 8: Other services such as revivals, certificates, copies.
Service standards are available on the Corporations Canada website.
Performance Results:
Performance Results 1: 96.0%
Performance Results 2: 98.3%
Performance Results 3: 82.7%
Performance Results 4: 95.5%
Performance Results 5: 93.9%
Performance Results 6: 99.0%
Performance Results 7: 99.9%
Performance Results 8: 95.0%
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
11,200 | 11,560 | 12,574 | 2011–12 | 11,500 | 12,122 |
2012–13 | 11,500 | 12,122 | |||
2013–14 | 11,500 | 12,122 |
User Fee: Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO)
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Financial Administration Act, Patent Act, Trade-marks Act, Copyright Act, Industrial Design Act, Integrated Circuit Topography Act, Department of Industry Act
Date Last Modified: June 2, 2007
Performance Standards: See CIPO Client Service Standards.
Performance Results: See CIPO Client Service Standards.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
144,314 | 147,490 | 143,169 | 2011–12 | 149,516 | 147,374 |
2012–13 | 152,670 | 150,698 | |||
2013–14 | 153,878 | 154,688 |
In accordance with the User Fees Act, the Department is reporting on its user fees. To be more transparent, the Department is also reporting on all its fees not subject to the User Fees Act. This reporting is done by the Department's service standards established for these fees. No revenue is reported in this fiscal year as user fee consultations have not yet begun.
User Fee: Personal Communication Service/Cellular Fees — Amended
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Radiocommunication Act, Section 6(1); Department of Industry Act, sections 18, 19, 20; Financial Administration Act, Section 19.1
Date Last Modified: The Minister may review and amend the fees during the licence term after consulting with licensees.
Performance Standards: Not applicable.
Performance Results: Not applicable.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
Not applicable | 2011–12 | Not applicable | |||
2012–13 | |||||
2013–14 |
User Fee: Spectrum Licence Renewal Fees for 24, 28 and 38 GHz Wireless Broadband Communications
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Radiocommunication Act, Section 6(1); Department of Industry Act, sections 18, 19, 20; Financial Administration Act, Section 19.1
Date Last Modified: The consultation process is completed but the formal User Fees Act process has not yet begun. It is anticipated to begin in 2011–12.
Performance Standards: Inspection performed within 10 calendar days of request.
Performance Results: Performance standard met, on average, 85% of the time.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
Not applicable | 2011–12 | Not applicable | |||
2012–13 | |||||
2013–14 |
Other Information:
The licence terms of 24/38 GHz spectrum licences obtained via the 1999 Auction were coming to an end starting in 2010. A decision released in March 2006 extended the initial licence terms of these licences. The decision also announced a licensing process available for 24, 28 and 38 GHz spectrum. Issuing these licences will require an annual fee be in place. A consultation was undertaken and the results are being reviewed prior to proceeding with the required stages under the User Fees Act (UFA). The fee is expected to be in place in 2011–12.
The initial public consultation took place in April 2008. It is anticipated that the proposed fee may be reviewed by Parliament under the UFA in 2011–12.
As established pursuant to the Policy on Service Standards for External Fees:
Only Actual Revenue is reported for RADIOCOM as demand for services and costs cannot be forecasted.
User Fee: Fixed Parameter Radio Stations
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Radiocommunication Act, Section 6(1); Department of Industry Act, sections 18, 19, 20; Financial Administration Act, Section 19.1
Date Last Modified: Radio Authorization fees: 2000
Performance Standards:
Performance Results:
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
Not available for this fee |
|
Not available for this fee | 2011–12 | Not available for this fee | |
2012–13 | |||||
2013–14 |
Other Information:
As established pursuant to the Policy on Service Standards for External Fees:
User Fee: Mobile Radio Stations
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Radiocommunication Act, Section 6(1); Department of Industry Act, sections 18, 19, 20; Financial Administration Act, Section 19.1
Date Last Modified: Radio Authorization fees: 2000
Performance Standards: Processing time of 7 weeks (35 business days) per transaction when international coordination is not required and 13 weeks (65 business days) when international coordination is required.
Performance Results:
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
Not available for this fee |
|
Not available for this fee | 2011–12 | Not available for this fee | |
2012–13 | |||||
2013–14 |
Other Information
As established pursuant to the Policy on Service Standards for External Fees:
Performance results are not legally subject to Section 5.1 of the UFA regarding fee reductions for unachieved performance.
User Fee:
Microwave Stations
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Radiocommunication Act, Section 6(1); Department of Industry Act, sections 18, 19, 20; Financial Administration Act, Section 19.1
Date Last Modified: Radio Authorization fees: 2000
Performance Standards:
Performance Results:
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
Not available for this fee |
a) i) 2,391.2 |
Not available for this fee | 2011–12 | Not available for this fee | |
2012–13 | |||||
2013–14 |
Other Information:
As established pursuant to the Policy on Service Standards for External Fees:
User Fee: Earth (Stations)
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Radiocommunication Act, Section 6(1); Department of Industry Act, sections 18, 19, 20; Financial Administration Act, Section 19.1
Date Last Modified: Radio Authorization fees: 2000
Performance Standards: Processing time of 7 weeks (35 business days) per transaction.
Performance Results: Service standard was met 99.9% of the time. Licences issued: 1,081.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
Not available for this fee | 78.2 | Not available for this fee | 2011–12 | Not available for this fee | |
2012–13 | |||||
2013–14 |
Other Information:
As established pursuant to the Policy on Service Standards for External Fees:
Performance results are not legally subject to Section 5.1 of the UFA regarding fee reductions for unachieved performance.
User Fee: Space (Stations)
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Radiocommunication Act, Section 6(1); Department of Industry Act, sections 18, 19, 20; Financial Administration Act, Section 19.1
Date Last Modified: Radio Authorization fees: 2000
Performance Standards: Not subject to performance standard.
Performance Results: Not applicable.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
Not available for this fee | 722.5 | Not available for this fee | 2011–12 | Not available for this fee | |
2012–13 | |||||
2013–14 |
Other Information:
As established pursuant to the Policy on Service Standards for External Fees:
User Fee: Renewals
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Radiocommunication Act, Section 6(1); Department of Industry Act, sections 18, 19, 20; Financial Administration Act, Section 19.1
Date Last Modified: Radio Authorization fees: 2000
Performance Standards: Not subject to performance standard.
Performance Results: Not applicable.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
Not available for this fee |
|
Not available for this fee | 2011–12 | Not available for this fee | |
2012–13 | |||||
2013–14 |
Other Information:
As established pursuant to the Policy on Service Standards for External Fees:
Subsequent to tabling in Parliament and online publication of the 2010-11 Departmental Performance Report, Industry Canada has determined that two of its user fees contained errors. In Industry Canada’s User Fee section, the Spectrum, Information Technologies and Telecommunications user fees for RADIOCOM and Radio and Terminal Equipment were mistakenly published with incorrect data. The user fees should have been reported as follows:
User Fee: RADIOCOM
Total
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
230,000 | 241,024 | 89,567 | 2011–12 | 250,000 | 84,792 |
2012–13 | 250,000 | 84,792 | |||
2013–14 | 250,000 | 84,792 |
Other Information:
As established pursuant to the Policy on Service Standards for External Fees:
Only Actual Revenue is reported for Radio and Terminal Equipment Approval as demand for services and costs cannot be forecasted.
User Fee: Radio and Terminal Equipment Approval — Registration Fee
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Radiocommunication Act, Section 6(1); Department of Industry Act, sections 18, 19, 20; Financial Administration Act, Section 19.1
Date Last Modified: September 10, 2007
Performance Standards: Processing time per transaction: 2 business days.
Performance Results: Service standard was met 100% of the time on 302 registrations.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
Not available for this fee | 227 | Not available for this fee | 2011–12 | Not available for this fee | Not available for this fee |
2012–13 | Not available for this fee | Not available for this fee | |||
2013–14 | 500 | Not available for this fee |
Other Information:
This fee is subject to the UFA.
User Fee: Radio and Terminal Equipment Approval — Listing Fee
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Radiocommunication Act, Section 6(1); Department of Industry Act, sections 18, 19, 20; Financial Administration Act, Section 19.1
Date Last Modified: September 10, 2007
Performance Standards: Processing time per transaction: 2 business days.
Performance Results: Service standard was met 100% of the time on 5,255 listings.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
Not available for this fee | 263 | Not available for this fee | 2011–12 | Not available for this fee | |
2012–13 | |||||
2013–14 |
Other Information:
This fee is subject to the UFA.
User Fee: Radio and Terminal Equipment Approval — Assessment Fee
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Radiocommunication Act, Section 6(1); Department of Industry Act, sections 18, 19, 20; Financial Administration Act, Section 19.1
Date Last Modified: September 10, 2007
Performance Standards: Processing time per transaction: 14 calendar days.
Performance Results: Service standard was met 100% of the time on 53 assessments.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
Not available for this fee | 64 | Not available for this fee | 2011–12 | Not available for this fee | |
2012–13 | |||||
2013–14 |
Other Information:
This fee is not subject to the UFA as similar services are available for private certification bodies.
User Fee: Radio and Terminal Equipment Approval — Technical Expertise Fee
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Radiocommunication Act, Section 6(1); Department of Industry Act, sections 18, 19, 20; Financial Administration Act, Section 19.1
Date Last Modified: September 10, 2007
Performance Standards: Not subject to performance standard.
Performance Results: Not applicable.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
Not available for this fee | 21 | Not available for this fee | 2011–12 | Not available for this fee | |
2012–13 | |||||
2013–14 |
Other Information:
This fee is not subject to the UFA as similar services are available for private certification bodies.
User Fee: Radio and Terminal Equipment Approval
Total
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
600 | 575 | 1,100 | 2011–12 | 550 | 1,100 |
2012–13 | 550 | 1,100 | |||
2013–14 | 500 | 1,100 |
Other Information:
Forecasted revenues are dependent on many variables such as the state of the economy and the introduction of innovative technology that is very unpredictable and will directly impact the demand for Industry Canada's services.
User Fee: Combined Merger Notification and Advance Ruling Certificate requests
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Department of Industry Act, Competition Bureau Fee and Service Standards Policy
Date Last Modified: November 1, 2010
Performance Standards:
Performance Standards 1:
Non-complex, 14 days
Performance Standards 2:
Complex,* 70 days
Complex, 45 days
Performance Standards 3:
Very complex, 5 months
Performance Results:
Performance Results 1:
Non-complex, 92.57%
Performance Results 2:
Complex,* 70 days: 94.12%
Complex,* 45 days: 80.00%
Performance Results 3:
Very complex,* 100%
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
1,650 | 1,600 | 15,647 | 2011–12 | 1,650 | 13,514 |
2012–13 | 1,650 | 13,514 | |||
2013–14 | 1,650 | 13,514 |
User Fee: Merger Notification
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: Department of Industry Act, Competition Bureau Fee and Service Standards Policy
Date Last Modified: November 1, 2010.
Performance Standards: See table above.
Performance Results: See table above
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
400 | 250 | 2,167 | 2011–12 | 400 | 2,896 |
2012–13 | 400 | 2,896 | |||
2013–14 | 400 | 2,896 |
User Fee: Advance Ruling Certificate requests
Fee Type: Other product or services
Fee-Setting Authority: Department of Industry Act, Competition Bureau Fee and Service Standards Policy
Date Last Modified: November 1, 2010.
Performance Standards: See table above.
Performance Results: See table above.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
8,000 | 9,025 | 1,979 | 2011–12 | 8,450 | 1,965 |
2012–13 | 8,450 | 1,965 | |||
2013–14 | 8,450 | 1,965 |
User Fee: Written opinions: The Commissioner may provide binding opinions on the applicability of provisions requested by an applicant to a proposed practice or conduct.
Fee Type: Other product or services
Fee-Setting Authority: Department of Industry Act, Competition Bureau Fee and Service Standards Policy
Date Last Modified: April 1, 2003
Performance Standards: Service standards vary, ranging from 2 to 10 weeks for different sections of the Competition Act (CA).
Performance Results: 20%*
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
25 | 79 | 225 | 2011–12 | 25 | 213 |
2012–13 | 25 | 213 | |||
2013–14 | 25 | 213 |
* In fiscal year 2011–12, the Bureau will start revisions of its Fee and Service Standards.
User Fee: CA number: Provide a CA number for fabric tags
Fee Type: Other products and services
Fee-Setting Authority: Department of Industry Act
Date Last Modified: 1986
Performance Standards: Not applicable.
Performance Results: Not applicable.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
90 | 78 | 203 | 2011–12 | 90 | 200 |
2012–13 | 90 | 200 | |||
2013–14 | 90 | 200 |
User Fee: Competition Bureau
Total
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
10,165 | 11,032 | 20,221 | 2011–12 | 10,615 | 18,788 |
2012–13 | 10,615 | 18,788 | |||
2013–14 | 10,615 | 18,788 |
User Fee: Canada Small Business Financing Act (CSBFA) Loans component (registration and administration fees)
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: CSBFA
Date Last Modified: Fees were established for the CSBFA in April 1999 and for the Capital Leasing Pilot Project in April 2002.
Performance Standards:
Performance Results:
a. Standard of 2 days or less to register loans was met 83% of the time.
b. i. On average, time required to process a claim in 2010–11 was 18 days.
ii.Standard of 20 days or less to process claims was met 69% of the time.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
49,275 | 50,473 | 4,479 | 2011–12 | 50,910 | 4,479 |
2012–13 | 52,500 | 4,479 | |||
2013–14 | 53,500 | 4,479 |
User Fee: Small Business Loans Act (SBLA) — Loans component (administration fees)
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: SBLA
Date Last Modified: A 1.25% administration fee was established in 1995.
Performance Standards: 20 days or less to process claims.
Performance Results:
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
20 | 2 | 0 | 2011–12 | 0 | 0 |
2012–13 | 0 | 0 | |||
2013–14 | 0 | 0 |
User Fee: Canada Small Business Financing (CSBF) Program
Total
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
49,295 | 50,475 | 4,479 | 2011–12 | 50,910 | 4,479 |
2012–13 | 52,500 | 4,479 | |||
2013–14 | 53,500 | 4,479 |
Other Information:
The Actual Revenue amounts represent the registration and administration fees of the loans and leases made.
Full Cost figures represent the operating cost of the Small Business Financing Directorate to administer the CSBF Program. Full Cost does not include expenses associated with claim payments made to financial institutions as a result of defaulted loans or leases. These expenses are covered in financial tables for Details on Other Programs.
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA)
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-Setting Authority: ATIA
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards:
Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to Section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request.
The ATIA provides fuller details.Performance Results: Statutory deadlines were met 74% of the time.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
3 | 3 | 2,061 | 2011–12 | 3 | 1,915 |
2012–13 | 3 | 1,915 | |||
2013–14 | 3 | 1,915 |
Other Information:
The ATIA permits the waiving of fees when deemed to be in the public interest and if under $25. The fees collected during the reporting period totalled $2,610. In accordance with government policy, it is the Department's practice to waive fees where the total owing per request amounts to less than $25. Fees waived during 2010–11 represented
$3,622.
There continues to be a significant increase in the number of times fees are waived due to the ongoing use of an electronic disclosure service. In addition, a number of applicants are seeking re-releases of information already disclosed, thus reducing fees collected even further. In order to reduce costs and increase efficiency, released documents are provided on CD-ROM, which means no reproduction fees are charged to the applicant.
As established pursuant to the Policy on Service Standards for External Fees:
The ATIA states that all formal requests submitted must be accompanied by a $5 application fee payable to the Receiver General of Canada. All fees prescribed and received pursuant to the ATIA are returned to the Consolidated Revenue Fund.
All fees collected and waived under the ATIA are detailed in the Department's annual report to Parliament on the ATIA.
According to prevailing legal opinion, where the corresponding fee introduction or most recent modification occurred prior to March 31, 2004, the:
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Subtotal (excluding CIPO) | 346,648 | 361,484 | 182,067 | 2011–12 | 367,211 | 181,263 |
2012–13 | 368,985 | 182,810 | ||||
2013–14 | 369,935 | 182,810 | ||||
CIPO Subtotal | 144,314 | 147,490 | 143,169 | 2011–12 | 149,516 | 147,374 |
2012–13 | 152,670 | 150,698 | ||||
2013–14 | 153,878 | 154,688 | ||||
Total | 490,962 | 508,974 | 325,236 | 2011–12 | 516,727 | 328,637 |
2012–13 | 521,654 | 333,508 | ||||
2013–14 | 523,813 | 337,498 |
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA) |
Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to Section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. The ATIA provides fuller details. |
Statutory deadlines were met 74% of the time. | This service standard is established under the ATIA and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken for amendments done in 1986 and 1992. |
Canada Small Business Financing Act (CSBFA) |
The following results were obtained: - Standard of 2 days or less to register loans was met 83% of the time. - On average, time required to process a claim in 2010–11 was 18 days. - Standard of 20 days or less to process claims met 69% of the time. |
Discussions with participating lenders indicate general satisfaction with performance results. Annual meetings with key lenders will continue to include discussions on stakeholder satisfaction with service standards and results. | |
Capital lease component (administration fees) | |||
Small Business Loans Act (SBLA) Loans component (administration fees) |
The following results were obtained: - On average, time required to process a claim in 2010–11 was 17 days. - Standard of 20 days or less to process claims was met 83% of the time. |
Discussions with participating lenders indicate general satisfaction with performance results. Annual meetings with key lenders will continue to include discussions on stakeholder satisfaction with service standards and results. | |
Corporations Canada has several product offerings, including file articles of incorporation, letters patent, file articles of continuance, file statements of revocation of intent to dissolve, file annual returns and name searches. |
Incorporations under the Canadian Business Corporations Act (CBCA): |
96% | |
Visitors: |
98.3% | ||
Batches: |
82.7% | ||
Incorporations under the Canada Corporations Act (CCA) Part II: |
95.5% | ||
Annual returns under CBCA: |
93.9% | ||
Annual summaries under CCA: |
99% | ||
Amendments under the CBCA incorporation: |
99.9% | ||
Other services such as revival, certificate, copies. | 95% Service standards are available on the Corporations Canada website. |
||
Measurement standards certification and measuring device approvals | Service standards published at mc.ic.gc.ca. | Clients are provided with the opportunity to express their views on an ongoing basis through an online service feedback form. During winter 2010, feedback on service delivery was sought from clients. Results of this consultation may be found on the Measurement Canada website. | |
Certificate of Calibration is issued within 60 calendar days. |
Performance standard met, on average, 95% of the time. |
||
Notice of Approval issued between 30 and 120 calendar days depending on complexity of submission. Categories of approval submissions and associated performance targets published as part of service standards. |
Performance standard met, on average, 89% of the time. |
||
Measuring device inspection |
Service standard published at mc.ic.gc.ca |
Clients are provided with the opportunity to express their views through an online service feedback form and during stakeholder meetings. Feedback is analyzed for trends and changes in processes instituted to improve service performance. | |
Inspection performed within 10 calendar days of request | Performance standard met, on average, 85% of the time. | ||
Measuring apparatus certification and electricity and natural gas meter approval |
Certificate of Calibration is issued within 60 calendar days. |
Performance standard was met, on average, 95% of the time. |
Clients are provided with the opportunity to express their views on an ongoing basis through an online service feedback form. During winter 2010, feedback on service delivery was sought from clients. Results of this consultation may be found on the Measurement Canada website. |
Notice of Approval issued between 30 and 120 calendar days depending on complexity of submission. Categories of approval submissions and associated performance targets published as part of service standards. | Performance standard was met, on average, 89% of the time. | ||
Electricity and natural gas meter inspection |
Service standard published at mc.ic.gc.ca Inspection performed within 10 calendar days of request |
Performance standard was met, on average, 85% of the time. | Clients are provided with the opportunity to express their views through an online service feedback form and during stakeholder meetings. Feedback is analyzed for trends and changes in processes instituted to improve service performance. |
Electricity and gas accreditation |
Service standard published at mc.ic.gc.ca Accreditation is granted within 1 month of an audit that demonstrates the applicant has met all requirements. |
Performance standard met 100% of the time. | Clients are provided with the opportunity to provide feedback through an online service feedback form and as part of regular performance audits. |
Registration Fee | Registration of new estates: 90% of the time within 2 days | 99.98% | |
Superintendent Levy | Letters of comment: Issued 90% of the time within 21 business days of receipt of the Statement of Affairs | 92.63% | |
Name Search Fee | Faxes answered within 24 hours | 100% | |
Trustee Licence Fee | No standard. Annual fee is paid by a trustee in order to retain his/her licence. The licence is annulled if the fee is not paid. | Not applicable | |
Fixed Parameter Radio Stations | Processing time of 3 weeks (15 business days) per transaction |
Service standard was met 98.6% of time. |
Stakeholder consultation takes place when any new fee is introduced or amended as per the requirements of the User Fees Act (UFA). |
Mobile Radio Stations | Processing time of 7 weeks (35 business days) per transaction when international coordination is not required and 13 weeks (75 business days) when international coordination is required |
Service standard was met 96.9% of time. |
|
Microwave Stations | Processing time of 4 weeks (20 business days) per transaction when international coordination is not required and 10 weeks (50 business days) when international coordination is required |
Service standard was met 92.3% of time. |
|
Earth Stations | Processing time of 7 weeks (35 business days) per transaction |
Service standard was met 99.9% of time. |
Other Information:
As of 2008–09, the User Fees Table of the Departmental Performance Report (DPR) provides revenues associated with new and amended licences, linked to the appropriate services standards. All other revenues from auctions ($584,253,965 amortized) and radio and spectrum licences ($241,023,797) will be reported in the non-respendable section
of the DPR in addition to the revenues reflected in the User Fees Table.
User Fee: Copies of textual documents and microforms, 105-mm microfiches of maps and architectural drawings, documents and archival records created in electronic formats by LAC staff
Fee Type: Other Products and Services (O)
Fee-setting Authority: The Department of Canadian Heritage Act, sections 8 to 12
Date Last Modified: Published in Canada Gazette, Part 1, August 6, 2005
Performance Standards: Regular orders are processed within 30 days of receipt.
For rush service:
Number of Copies | Response Time | |
---|---|---|
In-person Request | Written Request | |
100 | Maximum of 100 copies per 24 hours | 5 working days |
500 – 999 | 5 working days | 7 working days |
1,000 – 1,999 | 10 working days | |
2,000 – 2,999 | 15 working days | |
3,000 – 3,999 | 20 working days | |
4,000 – 4,999 | 25 working days | |
5,000 – 6,000 | 30 working days |
Number of Copies | Response Time | |
---|---|---|
In-person Request | Written Request | |
50 | Maximum of 50 copies per 24 hours | 7 working days |
250 – 499 | 5 to 10 working days | 7 to 10 working days |
500 – 749 | 10 to 15 working days | |
750 – 999 | 15 to 20 working days | |
1,000 – 1,249 | 20 to 25 working days | |
1,250 – 1,500 | 25 to 30 working days |
Performance Results: The processing standard of 30 days has been met at 95%. The processing standard for the rush service has been met at 100%.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
394.3 | 297.3 | 2,293.8 | 2011-12 | 408.1 | 2,351.0 |
2012-13 | 408.1 | 2,409.9 | |||
2013-14 | 408.1 | 2,470.1 |
Other Information: The Web site www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/copies/005010-5020-e.html contains further information regarding our services, prices and performance standards.
User Fee: Copies of documents on microform produced by clients themselves
Fee Type: Other Products and Services (O)
Fee-setting Authority: The Department of Canadian Heritage Act, sections 8 to 12
Date Last Modified: Published in Canada Gazette, Part 1, August 6, 2005
Performance Standards: Not applicable
Performance Results: Client Self-Service, clients get the microform on the shelf and make their own copies.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
52.7 | 22.6 | 99.2 | 2011-12 | 38.4 | 101.7 |
2012-13 | 38.4 | 104.2 | |||
2013-14 | 38.4 | 106.8 |
User Fee: Service fee for reproduction of documents produced by private sector suppliers
Fee Type: Other Products and Services (O)
Fee-setting Authority: The Department of Canadian Heritage Act, sections 8 to 12
Date Last Modified: Published in Canada Gazette, Part 1, August 6, 2005
Performance Standards: Upon receipt of request: for copied material: approx. 6 weeks; for uncopied material: approx. 10-12 weeks
Performance Results: The processing standard of 6 weeks for copied material has been met at 99%; the processing standard of 12 weeks for uncopied material has been met at 99%.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
56.0 | 27.6 | 716.8 | 2011-12 | 49.5 | 734.7 |
2012-13 | 49.5 | 753.1 | |||
2013-14 | 49.5 | 771.9 |
User Fee: Postage and handling
Fee Type: Other Products and Services (O)
Fee-setting Authority: The Department of Canadian Heritage Act, sections 8 to 12
Date Last Modified: Published in Canada Gazette, Part 1, August 6, 2005
Performance Standards: Not applicable
Performance Results: Not applicable
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
36.8 | 30.3 | 51.5 | 2011-12 | 40.4 | 52.8 |
2012-13 | 40.4 | 54.1 | |||
2013-14 | 40.4 | 55.5 |
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act
Fee Type: Other Products and Services (O)
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: 2007 (as a result of amendments to the Federal Accountabi-lity Act)
Performance Standards: 30 days, or within allowable time extensions
Performance Results: Access to Information Act: 94% of the formal requests were completed on time. Privacy Act: 99% of the formal requests were completed on time
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
10.2 | 10.9 | 6,781.8 | 2011-12 | 13.6 | 6,951.3 |
2012-13 | 13.6 | 7,125.1 | |||
2013-14 | 13.6 | 7,303.2 |
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Subtotal Regulatory | 2011-12 | |||||
2012-13 | ||||||
2013-14 | ||||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services | 550.0 | 388.7 | 9,943.1 | 2011-12 | 550.0 | 10,191.5 |
2012-13 | 550.0 | 10,446.4 | ||||
2013-14 | 550.0 | 10,707.5 | ||||
Total | 550.0 | 388.7 | 9,943.1 | 2011-12 | 550.0 | 10,191.5 |
2012-13 | 550.0 | 10,446.4 | ||||
2013-14 | 550.0 | 10,707.5 |
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Copies of textual documents and microforms, 105-mm microfiches of maps and architectural drawings documents and archival records created in electronic formats by LAC staff | Regular orders are processed within 30 days of receipt. For rush service see Table 6-A Section C. | The processing standard of 30 days has been met at 92%. The processing standard for the rush service has been met at 100%. | During 2010-2011, Stakeholder Consultations were conducted with clients using the services at distance and in-person. 83.3% of “at a distance” clients were satisfied with services received. 87% of “in-person” clients were satisfied with services received. |
Copies of documents on microform produced by clients themselves | Not applicable | Clients serve themselves. They pick-up the microforms from the shelf and make their own copies. | |
Service fee for reproduction of documents produced by private sector suppliers | Upon receipt of request: for copied material: approx. 6 weeks; for uncopied material: approx. 10-12 weeks. | The processing standard of 6 weeks for copied material has been met at 99% The processing standard of 10-12 weeks for uncopied material has been met at 99% |
During 2010-2011, Stakeholder Consultations were conducted with clients using the services at distance and in-person. 83.3% of “at a distance” clients were satisfied with services received. 87% of “in person” clients were satisfied with services received. |
User Fee: Fees charged for the issuance of operating licenses under the Canada Oil and Gas Operations Act (COGO Act).
Fee Type: Regulatory (R)
Fee-setting Authority: Canada Oil and Gas Operations Act, section 5(1)(a); Canada Oil and Gas Operations Regulations, section 3(2)(d)
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards:
Well drilling applications: 100 per cent of decisions rendered within 21 calendar days of receiving a complete application.
Geological and geophysical applications:
100 per cent of decisions rendered within 30 calendar days of receiving a complete application.
Performance Results:
Well drilling applications: 4 received: 100 per cent of decisions rendered within 21 calendar days.
Geological and geophysical applications:
7 received: 100 per cent of decisions rendered within 30 calendar days.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
1.0 | 0.7 | 6,342.3 | 2011-12 | 1.0 | 6,845.0 |
2012-13 | 1.0 | 6,533.0 | |||
2013-14 | 1.0 | 6,250.0 |
Other Information: Under the COGO Act, the NEB regulates oil and gas activities on Frontier lands not subject to a federal/provincial accord.
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act.
Fee Type: Other Products and Services (O)
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act, section 11; Access to Information Regulations, section 7
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Response provided within 30 days following the receipt of request. The response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the Access to Information Act. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request.
Performance Results: 30 requests were completed in 2010-11. 35 requests were received during the reporting period and 5 requests were carried forward from the previous period. 10 requests were carried forward into 2011-12. 24 requests (69 per cent) were completed in 30 days or a notice of extension was sent within 30 days. 4 requests were completed in 31-60 days and 6 requests were completed in 61-120 days.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
1.0 | 1.3 | 260.0 | 2011-12 | 1.0 | 250.0 |
2012-13 | 1.0 | 250.0 | |||
2013-14 | 1.0 | 250.0 |
Other Information: The number of Access to Information Act requests received by the NEB increased considerably in 2010-11. This unprecedented number of requests affected performance results. To address this, the NEB assigned additional resources through internal reallocation and developed new tools during the year.
Note: According to prevailing legal opinion, where the corresponding fee introduction or most recent modification occurred prior to March 31, 2004:
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Subtotal Regulatory | 1.0 | 0.7 | 6,342.3 | 2011-12 | 1.0 | 6,845.0 |
2012-13 | 1.0 | 6,533.0 | ||||
2013-14 | 1.0 | 6,250.0 | ||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services | 1.0 | 1.3 | 260.0 | 2011-12 | 1.0 | 250.0 |
2012-13 | 1.0 | 250.0 | ||||
2013-14 | 1.0 | 250.0 | ||||
Total | 2.0 | 2.0 | 6,602.3 | 2011-12 | 2.0 | 7,095.0 |
2012-13 | 2.0 | 6,783.0 | ||||
2013-14 | 2.0 | 6,500.0 |
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Fees charged for the issuance of operating licenses under the Canada Oil and Gas Operations Act (COGO Act) | Well drilling applications 100 per cent of decisions rendered within 21 calendar days of receiving a complete application. Geological and geophysical applications 100 per cent of decisions rendered within 30 calendar days of receiving a complete application. |
Well drilling applications 4 received: 100 per cent of decisions rendered within 21 calendar days. Geological and geophysical applications 7 received: 100 per cent of decisions rendered within 30 calendar days. |
The NEB’s COGO Act service standards are reviewed with stakeholders on an opportunity basis at meetings with companies, organizations (such as the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers), and at other venues (such as the Annual Oil and Gas Forum). |
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act | Response provided within 30 days following the receipt of request. The response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the Access to Information Act. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. | 30 requests were completed in 2010-11. 35 requests were received during the reporting period and 5 requests were carried forward from the previous period. 10 requests were carried forward into 2011-12. 24 requests (69 per cent) were completed in 30 days or a notice of extension was sent within 30 days. 4 requests were completed in 31-60 days and 6 requests were completed in 61-120 days. | This service standard is established by the Access to Information Act and its regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments done in 1986 and 1992. |
Note: As established pursuant to the Policy on Service Standards for External Fees:
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA)
Fee Type: Other products and services (O)
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: 2011
Performance Standards: Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to Section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. NRC's web site provides additional information on the Access to Information Act requirements, NRC's ATIP services in addition to NRC's Annual Reports to Parliament.
Performance Results: NRC received 55 access to information requests and 34 consultations from other government departments.
2010-11 ($ dollars) | Planning Years ($ dollars) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
500 | 265 | 81,249 | 2011-12 | 500 | 250,000 |
2012-13 | 500 | 250,000 | |||
2013-14 | 500 | 250,000 |
Other Information:
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Certified Reference Materials Program (NRC-INMS) | 3 business days turnaround time between reception of order and shipping of order | Of the 800 orders received this fiscal year, 92.8% met the 3-day standard. | None of the 800 customers responded to NRC's survey. The low response rate was taken as indicative of general satisfaction with the Program. One official complaint was received regarding a product received in a broken ampoule. Packaging method was modified. |
Sale of National Code Documents and other documents | Orders processed (shipped) 1-14 days after receipt of all required information | 95% of orders shipped within the target of 14 days | 91% of clients indicated satisfaction with the product and services, with the overall satisfaction measurement being "very good". Of 6,368 orders, 39 were refunded or exchanged due to dissatisfaction of the PDF product by the client. (Reasons cited included: inability to download it due to security issues; inability to manipulate it to the extent preferred; limitation of access from only one computer, etc.) |
Fees charged for Parking | 3 day turnaround time between request and delivery of parking passes; ongoing monitoring of parking sites. | Parking fee implementation is in early stages. Of 1118 requests for parking passes, all were filled on time, and regular monitoring of sites took place. | One request for further information or review of the parking situation was acted upon promptly and resolved in a respectful and appropriate manner. |
Other Information:
User Fee: Explosives license and inspection fees
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Explosives Act
Date Last Modified: 2009
Performance Standards: 95% of the time, initial factory applications will be completed within 60 days of receipt of completed documentation; renewals and all other authorizations will be processed within 30 days of a complete request.
Performance Results: Licensing turnaround times have been acceptable to stakeholders. Results indicate the performance standards were met or exceeded 95% of the time.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
1,889 | 2,433 | 4,767* | 2011–12 | 1,889 | 4,900* |
2012–13 | 1,889 | 5,037* | |||
2013–14 | 1,889 | 5,178* |
*excluding PSAT
User Fee: Seismic data
Fee Type: Other Products and Services
Fee-setting Authority: Resources and Technical Surveys Act
Date Last Modified: 2004
Performance Standards: For provision of accurate location and magnitude of strong earthquakes in Canada, turnaround time is normally within 2 hours during working hours and within 4 hours outside of working hours. Preliminary confirmation is normally available to clients within 15 minutes during normal working hours and on our Web site.
For all other requests for standard seismic data, turnaround time is within five working days. Complex requests are negotiated with the client.
Performance Results: Service standards are reviewed annually (inquiries are recorded) - results indicate greater than 95% compliance with standards.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
700 | 645 | 645 | 2011–12 | 700 | 700 |
2012–13 | 700 | 700 | |||
2013–14 | 700 | 700 |
User Fee: Map products
Fee Type: Other Products and Services
Fee-setting Authority: Resources and Technical Surveys Act, Canada Land Surveys Act
Date Last Modified: 2004
Performance Standards: National Topographic System and Atlas of Canada maps - NRCan sells maps on a wholesale basis from the Canada Map Office to a limited distribution network, and service standards reflect this.
Response time for information requests is two working days. Order processing time: the CMO will strive to fill orders received from the Regional Distribution Centres (RDC) within five (5) working days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and statutory holidays in the Province of Ontario), upon approved credit and provided that the account is in good standing. Hours of operation, 08:30 - 16:30
EST.
Performance Results: The service standard of five working days is met 95% or the time. The Centre for Topographic Information of the Mapping Services Branch is certified ISO 9001:2000, hence it undergoes regular management review of quality objectives, discrepancy reporting processes, and client consultation. Performance issues are addressed through ISO Quality Objectives which are updated each year to address issues that may arise.
Aggregate annual data is available on request.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
100 | 78 | 78 | 2011–12 | 100 | 100 |
2012–13 | 100 | 100 | |||
2013–14 | 100 | 100 |
User Fee: ISO non-destructive testing
Fee Type: Other Products and Services
Fee-setting Authority: Resources and Technical Surveys Act
Date Last Modified:2002
Performance Standards: Two weeks for processing of a candidate's application form. This period is advertised on application forms 'Instructions for Candidates', available in hard copy or electronically from the Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) Web site. All candidates have this information before applying. *Note: Assessment of foreign applications or unusual training/experience situations may require more time.
Examination results are usually available three weeks from the date of examination. This period is clearly specified in the 'letter of approval' issued to the candidate to permit him/her to challenge an examination.
Performance Results: The progress of each client application is recorded and tracked throughout the process - date of receipt, date of review, date of written responses. While performance has not been formally aggregated to summarize performance against service standards, the absence of stakeholder complaints indicates satisfaction that the published delivery standards are being met.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
1,100 | 1,241 | 1,241 | 2011–12 | 1,150 | 1,150 |
2012–13 | 1,200 | 1,200 | |||
2013–14 | 1,250 | 1,250 |
User Fee: Air Photo Products
Fee Type: Other Products and Services
Fee-setting Authority: Resources and Technical Surveys Act
Date Last Modified: 2004
Performance Standards: Aerial Photography - Order processing time by the National Air Photo Library is ten working days, priority service five working days; response time for information requests of ten working days 80% of the time; production error rate of 2% or less; hours of operation, 08:30 - 16:30 ES
Performance Results: The service standard is met 80% of the time. Performance issues are addressed through ISO Quality Objectives which are updated each year to address issues that arise.
Performance results are monitored continuously. Aggregate annual data is available on request.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
500 | 491 | 491 | 2011–12 | 500 | 500 |
2012–13 | 500 | 500 | |||
2013–14 | 500 | 500 |
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request.
The Access to Information Act provides further details: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/A-1.
Performance Results: Met prescribed standards 91.5% of the time.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
5 | 2 | 477 | 2011–12 | 4 | 550 |
2012–13 | 4.5 | 575 | |||
2013–14 | 5 | 600 |
User Fee: Other Products
Fee Type: Other Products and Services
Fee-setting Authority: Resources and Technical Surveys Act
Date Last Modified: 2004
Performance Standards: For aeromagnetic, radiometric and gravity data, the Geoscience Data Centre (GDC) of Earth Sciences Sector (ESS) provides maximum 10 day turn-around on external requests for data (average turnaround for a standard request is one day). We also provide on-line access through the Geoscience Data Repository for Geophysical and Geochemical Data (GDRGG). For more information on service standards see the Web site.
Performance Results: Performance is aggregated against standards annually. In 2008-09, 100% of requests are in compliance with standards.
The number of inquires has dropped significantly since data has been made available free of charge through the GDRGG. Typically there are 10 to 20 requests for information made to the GDC annually and 10,000 to 15,000 downloads from the online service annually. The GDRGG is available 24/7, 365 days per year.
2010–11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
80 | 113 | 81 | 2011–12 | 80 | 80 |
2012–13 | 80 | 80 | |||
2013–14 | 80 | 80 |
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Subtotal Regulatory | 1,894 | 2,435 | 5,244 | 2011-12 | 1,893 | 5,450 |
2012-13 | 1,894 | 5,612 | ||||
2013-14 | 1,894 | 5,778 | ||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services | 2,480 | 2,568 | 2,536 | 2011-12 | 2,530 | 2,530 |
2012-13 | 2,580 | 2,580 | ||||
2013-14 | 2,630 | 2,630 | ||||
Total | 4,374 | 5,003 | 7,780 | 2011-12 | 4,423 | 7,980 |
2012-13 | 4,474 | 8,192 | ||||
2013-14 | 4,524 | 8,408 |
External Fee |
Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Explosives licence and inspection fees |
95% of the time, initial factory applications will be completed within 60 days of receipt of completed documentation; renewals and all other authorizations will be processed within 30 days of a complete request. |
Licensing turnaround times have been acceptable to stakeholders. Results indicate the performance standards were met or exceeded 95% of the time. |
Stakeholder groups are in agreement with licensing and authorization service standards. No formal complaints to this proposal have been received. |
|||
Seismic data |
For provision of accurate location and magnitude of strong earthquakes in Canada, turnaround time is normally within 2 hours during working hours and within 4 hours outside of working hours. Preliminary confirmation is normally available to clients within 15 minutes during normal working hours and on our Web site. For all other requests for standard seismic data, turnaround time is within five working days. Complex requests are negotiated with the client. |
Service standards are reviewed annually (inquiries are recorded) - results indicate greater than 95% compliance with standards. |
None planned at present (regular consultation provided through the Lithoprobe Seismic Processing Facility in Calgary). Client feedback on service expectations encouraged through questionnaires that accompanies responses to data requests. |
|||
Map products |
National Topographic System and Atlas of Canada maps - NRCan sells maps on a wholesale basis from the Canada Map Office (CMO) to a limited distribution network, and service standards reflect this. Response time for information requests is two working days. Order processing time: The CMO will strive to fill orders received from the the Regional Distributions Centres (RDC) within five (5) working days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and statutory holidays in the Province of Ontario), upon approved credit and provided account is in good standing. Hours of operation, 08:30 - 16:30 EST. |
Service standard of five working days is met 95% of the time. Service standards are included in the annual management review of Quality Objectives under ISO 9001:2000. ISO Quality Objectives are updated each year to address issues as they arise. |
Regular discussions and meetings are held with stakeholders. Service standards are reviewed continuously and included as part of the Discrepancy Management Reports (DMRs). Ongoing client and service feedback are used to ensure constant improvement as part of ISO 9001 quality system. |
|||
ISO non-destructive testing |
1 - Two weeks for processing of a candidate's application form. This period is advertised on application forms 'Instructions for Candidates', available in hard copy or electronically from the Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) Web site. All candidates have this information before applying. *Note: Assessment of foreign applications or unusual training/experience situations may require more time. 2 - Examination results are usually available three weeks from the date of examination. This period is clearly specified in the 'letter of approval' issued to the candidate to permit him/her to challenge an examination. |
1- The progress of each client application is recorded and tracked throughout the process - date of receipt, date of review, date of written responses. While performance has not been formally aggregated to summarize performance against service standards, the absence of stakeholder complaints indicates satisfaction that the published delivery standards are being met 98% of the time. |
Fee adjustments are presented and negotiated with the 12 member advisory body of stakeholders. Previously the agreed price structure associated with fees for required services and reports is put into effect and not changed for 3 years. The stakeholders like the stability in knowing what they will be paying for the next 3 years. The revised plan is to move to annual fee adjustments based on actual costs. From January through June 2006, extensive consultations on exam fees were held with 8 exam centres, the advisory board, and the union representing 2,000 clients. The objective of these consultations was to isolate cost drivers in order to derive a formula driven fee structure. This previously outlined objective is not yet completed and is pending. Of note, the NDT Certifying Agency, along with the Materials Technology Laboratory (CANMET/MMS/MTL), has been relocated from Ottawa to Hamilton in late 2010. The Agency is working very diligently to establish stable resources and capabilities to properly execute on a smooth and seamless transition, while focusing on improving the overall level of customer service and effective cost management. The Agency had hosted two meetings Canadian General Standards Board (CGSB) Committee Meeting & MTL NDT Advisory Board Meeting) with external stakeholders, where consultations were discussed on various aspects of the certification services that the Agency provides. |
|||
Air Photo products |
Aerial Photography - Order processing time by the National Air Photo Library is ten working days, priority service five working days; response time for information requests of ten working days 80% of the time; production error rate of 2% or less; hours of operation, 08:30 - 16:30 EST. |
Service standard of ten working days is met 80% of the time. Service standards are included in annual management review of Quality Objectives under ISO 9001:2000. ISO Quality Objectives are updated each year to address issues as they arise. |
Major survey completed in 2004. Initiated a needs requirement analysis based on sales statistics to determine future directions for improvement. Service standards are reviewed continuously and included as part of the Discrepancy Management Reports (DMRs). Ongoing client and service feedback are used to ensure constant improvement as part of ISO 9001 quality system. |
|||
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act |
Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. |
Met prescribed standards 91.5% of the time |
The service standard is established by the Access to Information Act and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments done in 1986 and 1992. |
|||
Other products |
For aeromagnetic radiometric and gravity data, the Geoscience Data Centre (GDC) of Earth Science Sector (ESS) provides maximum 10 day turn-around on external requests for data (average turnaround for a standard request is one day). We also provide on-line access through the Geoscience Data Repository for Geophysical and Geochemical Data (GDRGG). For more info on service standards see the Web site. |
Performance is aggregated against standards annually. In 2008-9, 100% of requests were in compliance with standards. The number of inquires to the Geophysical Data Centre has dropped significantly since data have been made available free of charge through the GDRGG. Typically, there are 10 to 20 requests for information made to the GDC annually and 10,000 to 15,000 down loads from the online service annually. The GDRGG is available 24/7, 365 days a year. |
Client consultation is performed on an ongoing basis. All web-based clients are provided with a client satisfaction questionnaire including a request for suggestions for improvement. Advent of the GDRGG (web-based access) has significantly reduced requests via the GDC. |
|||
Other Information: Digital Topographical Data (formerly Subscription Data) Is made available free online. As such no fees or revenue have been collected for this service, however, the associated service standards are being reported on. |
||||||
Digital Topographic Data |
National Topographic Data Base (NTDB) Canvec and others - Response time for general information requests is two working days during business hours. Availability of web-site is 24-7 90% of the time, monitored monthly. |
Web-site was available 24-7 90% of the time. Performance results are monitored continuously (on-line surveys). Target 95% client satisfaction. Actual satisfaction level for the product quality and delivery is at 89%- website improvements will be made to help clients and improve the satisfaction level. Complaints acknowledged within two working days - and as per ISO procedures, corrective action is taken immediately. |
Client consultation is ongoing - part of regular ISO process. |
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA)
Fee Type: Other products and services (O)
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension must be sent within 30 days after receipt of request.
The Access to Information Act provides more details: http://lois.justice.gc.ca/en/A-1/index.html.Performance Results: In 2010-2011 OCOL received 17 requests and 15 consultations under the Access to Information Act, two requests and one consultation under the Privacy Act. Three ATI requests were late and one complaint was received.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
- | 0.1 | 80 | 2011-12 | - | 80 |
2012-13 | - | 80 | |||
2013-14 | - | 80 |
Other Information:
The electronic table Policy on Service Standards for External Fees can be found on the Treasury Board Secretariat's website.
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA) |
Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension must be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. |
The deadlines stipulated in the Act were respected in 82 per cent of the cases. | The service standard is established by the Access to Information Act and the Access to Information Regulations. |
User Fee: Superintendent Non-deemed Approvals Except Deposit and Trust Agreements and Letters of Credit
S1-21 Approval to maintain a representative office of a foreign bank
S1-40 Reservation of a name
S2-02 Accreditation of a provincial reinsurer
Fee Type: Regulatory (R)
Fee-setting Authority: OSFI Act
Date Last Modified: April 28, 2006
Performance Standards1: 90% will be processed in less than 60 calendar days of receipt
Performance Results1: 95% were processed in less than 60 calendar days of receipt
2010-2011 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
46 | 27 | 27 | 2011-12 | 34 | 34 |
2012-13 | 34 | 34 | |||
2013-14 | 34 | 34 |
User Fee: Ministerial Approvals
S1-01 Letters patent of incorporation
S1-02 Letters patent of continuance
S1-03 Order permitting a foreign bank to carry on banking business in Canada
S1-04 Order approving the insuring in Canada of risks by a foreign body corporate
S1-14 Exemption from material banking group status
S1-15 Approval for a foreign bank or entity associated with a foreign bank to have a financial establishment in Canada
S1-16 Approval for a foreign bank or entity associated with a foreign bank in respect of investments and activities in Canada
Fee Type: R
Fee-setting Authority: OSFI Act
Date Last Modified: April 28, 2006
Performance Standards1: 80% will be processed in less than 90 calendar days of receipt
Performance Results1: 98% were processed in less than 90 calendar days of receipt
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
845 | 328 | 328 | 2011-12 | 634 | 634 |
2012-13 | 634 | 634 | |||
2013-14 | 634 | 634 |
User Fee: Precedents / Rulings / Interpretations
S2-01 Written, precedent-setting ruling relating to the quality of capital
S2-03 Written interpretation of Acts, regulations, guidelines or rulings
Fee Type: R
Fee-setting Authority: OSFI Act
Date Last Modified: August 13, 2003
Performance Standards1: 80% will be processed in less than 180 calendar days of receipt
Performance Results1: 100% were processed in less than 180 calendar days of receipt
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
18 | 25 | 25 | 2011-12 | 18 | 18 |
2012-13 | 18 | 18 | |||
2013-14 | 18 | 18 |
User Fee: Non-precedential Confirmations of Quality of Capital
S2-04 Written, non-precedent-setting confirmation of quality of capital
Fee Type: R
Fee-setting Authority: OSFI Act
Date Last Modified: August 13, 2003
Performance Standards1: 90% will be processed in less than 60 calendar days of receipt
Performance Results1: 100% were processed in less than 60 calendar days of receipt
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
166 | 152 | 152 | 2011-12 | 160 | 160 |
2012-13 | 160 | 160 | |||
2013-14 | 160 | 160 |
User Fee: Copies of Corporate Documents and Certificates of Confirmation
S2-10 Copies of any one of the following corporate documents (per request and per body corporate): (a) a certificate of confirmation; (b) a certified copy of letters patent or of incorporation or amalgamation documents; and (c) the corporate history of a body corporate
Fee Type: Other Products and Services (O)
Fee-setting Authority: OSFI Act
Date Last Modified: August 13, 2003
Performance Standards1: 90% will be processed within 2 business days of receipt
Performance Results1: 100% were processed within 2 business days of receipt
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
74 | 102 | 102 | 2011-12 | 74 | 74 |
2012-13 | 74 | 74 | |||
2013-14 | 74 | 74 |
User Fee: Access to Information User Fees
Fees charged for processing access requests filed under the Access to Information Act
Fee Type: O
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards1: Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the Access to Information Act. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. The Actprovides more details: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/A-1/index.html.
Performance Results1: Statutory deadline of 30 days met 100% of the time
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
4 | 1 | 245 | 2011-12 | 4 | 252 |
2012-13 | 4 | 260 | |||
2013-14 | 4 | 268 |
Other Information:
In July 2000, the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency ruled that most of the service charges are exempted from GST under the Excise Tax Act.
A fee is either identified as “Regulatory” (R) or “Other Products and Services” (O). A Regulatory fee relates to an activity undertaken by a department that is integral to the effectiveness of a program and successful achievement of the program mandate requires moderating, directing, testing, or approving the actions of external parties.
The full cost is based on the fiscal year salary levels according to collective agreements, the fiscal year Treasury Board benefit factors and OSFI’S factor for indirect costs.
1Note: According to prevailing legal opinion, where the corresponding fee introduction or most recent modification occurred prior to March 31, 2004:
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Sub-Total (R) | 1,075 | 532 | 532 | 2011-12 | 846 | 846 |
2012-13 | 846 | 846 | ||||
2013-14 | 846 | 846 | ||||
Sub-Total (O) | 78 | 103 | 347 | 2011-12 | 78 | 326 |
2012-13 | 78 | 334 | ||||
2013-14 | 78 | 342 | ||||
Total | 1,153 | 635 | 879 | 2011-12 | 924 | 1,172 |
2012-13 | 924 | 1,180 | ||||
2013-14 | 924 | 1,188 |
External Fee | Service Standard2 | Performance Results3 | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
|
90% will be processed in less than 60 calendar days of receipt | 95% were processed in less than 60 calendar days of receipt |
Although the number of approvals subject to a Regulatory fee represents 25% of the total approvals processed in 2010-2011, OSFI applies these standards to all application for regulatory approvals in order to provide a better quality of service.4 |
External Fee | Service Standard2 | Performance Results3 | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
|
80% will be processed in less than 90 calendar days of receipt | 98% were processed in less than 90 calendar days of receipt |
Although the number of approvals subject to a Regulatory fee represents 25% of the total approvals processed in 2010-2011, OSFI applies these standards to all application for regulatory approvals in order to provide a better quality of service.4 |
External Fee | Service Standard2 | Performance Results3 | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
|
80% will be processed in less than 180 calendar days of receipt | 100% were processed in less than 180 calendar days of receipt |
Although the number of approvals subject to a Regulatory fee represents 25% of the total approvals processed in 2010-2011, OSFI applies these standards to all application for regulatory approvals in order to provide a better quality of service.4 |
External Fee | Service Standard2 | Performance Results3 | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Written, non-precedent-setting confirmation of quality of capital | 90% will be processed in less than 60 calendar days of receipt | 100% were processed in less than 60 calendar days of receipt |
Although the number of approvals subject to a Regulatory fee represents 25% of the total approvals processed in 2010-2011, OSFI applies these standards to all application for regulatory approvals in order to provide a better quality of service.4 |
External Fee | Service Standard2 | Performance Results3 | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Copies of any one of the following corporate documents (per request and per body corporate): (a) a certificate of confirmation; (b) a certified copy of letters patent or of incorporation or amalgamation documents; and (c) the corporate history of a body corporate | 90% will be processed within 2 business days of receipt | 100% were processed within 2 business days of receipt |
Although the number of approvals subject to a Regulatory fee represents 25% of the total approvals processed in 2010-2011, OSFI applies these standards to all application for regulatory approvals in order to provide a better quality of service.4 |
External Fee | Service Standard2 | Performance Results3 | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Fees charged for processing access requests filed under the Access to Information Act | Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the Access to Information Act. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. The Act provides fuller details. | Statutory deadlines met 100% of the time |
The service standard is established by the Access to Information Act and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments done in 1986 and 1992. |
Other Information: None
2 As established pursuant to the Policy on Service Standards for External Fees:
3 Performance results are not legally subject to section 5.1 of the UFA regarding fee reductions for unachieved performance.
4In 2010-2011, OSFI conducted three confidential survey consultations with deposit-taking institutions, executives of the FIs that OSFI regulates, and life insurance companies. Results showed that a strong majority of respondents were satisfied with OSFI in processing applications for regulatory approvals and believes that OSFI’s approval process is timely and efficient. From time to time, OSFI receives letters of appreciation from applicants thanking OSFI on the quality of its regulatory approval process.
A. User Fee | Fee Type | Fee- setting Authority | Date Last Modified | 2010–11 | Planning Years | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue ($000) | Actual Revenue ($000) | Estimated Full Cost ($000) | Performance Standard | Performance Result | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue ($000) | Estimated Full Cost ($000) | ||||
Entry Fees | Other Products and Services | Parks Canada Agency Act | Increased in 2008. New fees added in 2010. | $52,500 | $51,417 | $236,233 | 85% of visitors are satisfied | 100% of sampled locations exceed the standard | 2011–2012 | $52,500 | $165,844 |
2012–2013 | $52,500 | $165,739 | |||||||||
2013–2014 | $52,500 | $165,695 | |||||||||
Camping Fees | Other Products and Services | Parks Canada Agency Act | Increased in 2008. New fees added in 2010. | $16,500 | $17,272 | $31,238 | 85% of visitors are satisfied | 100% of sampled locations exceed the standard | 2011–2012 | $16,500 | $21,930 |
2012–2013 | $16,500 | $21,916 | |||||||||
2013–2014 | $16,500 | $21,910 | |||||||||
Lockage and Mooring fees | Other Products and Services | Parks Canada Agency Act | Lockage and Mooring fees increased in 2008. | $2,410 | $2,691 | $37,242 | 85% of visitors are satisfied | 100% of sampled locations exceed the standard | 2011–2012 | $2,410 | $26,145 |
2012–2013 | $2,410 | $26,129 | |||||||||
2013–2014 | $2,410 | $26,122 | |||||||||
Pools | Other Products and Services | Parks Canada Agency Act | Increased in 2003. | $3,810 | $3,812 | $5,578 | 85% of visitors are satisfied | For the 2010 cycle, no locations with this service were surveyed. | 2011–2012 | $3,810 | $3,916 |
2012–2013 | $3,810 | $3,914 | |||||||||
2013–2014 | $3,810 | $3,913 | |||||||||
Municipal Services | Other Products and Services | Canada National Parks Act | Water and sewer fees increased in 2001; remainder in 2003. Garbage fees increased in 1996. | $3,100 | $2,926 | $12,802 | For water, the Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality (2002) is the current standard. For wastewater, PCA will meet Federal Guidelines (1976) for effluent quality and work towards setting and meeting PCA leadership standards that are based on the receiving waters of each community. Garbage collection frequencies will be established in consultation with Community Councils and Business Community. | Water quality Guidelines are met or exceeded; wastewater effluent quality meets or exceeds the standards | 2011–2012 | $3,100 | $9,916 |
2012–2013 | $3,100 | $6,708 | |||||||||
2013–2014 | $3,100 | $5,639 | |||||||||
Other Revenues | Other Products and Services | Parks Canada Agency Act | Business licences increased in 1994; Other fees increased in 2008. New fees added in 2010. | $8,000 | $8,298 | $49,723 | 85% of visitors are satisfied | 100% of sampled locations exceed the standard | 2011–2012 | $8,000 | $34,908 |
2012–2013 | $8,000 | $34,885 | |||||||||
2013–2014 | $8,000 | $34,876 | |||||||||
Total | $86,320 | $86,416 | $372,817 | 2011–2012 | $86,320 | $262,658 | |||||
2012–2013 | $86,320 | $259,291 | |||||||||
2013–2014 | $86,320 | $258,155 |
In May 2009, Parks Canada announced a two-year fee freeze at all national parks and national historic sites managed by the Agency. Included are prices for all Parks Canada entry fees, camping at national parks, lockage and mooring at historic canals and several other national fees for basic services. The fee freeze is intended to support the tourism industry and local economies and help more Canadians experience Canada’s treasured natural and historic places. Subsequently, it was announced in November 2010 that the fee freeze was extended for an additional year due to the slower than expected recovery from the global financial crisis. Therefore, the general public 2008 prices are in effect until April 1, 2012, and commercial groups 2009 prices are in effect until April 1, 2013.
In 2010, Parks Canada developed and received approval for new market responsive service improvements at several parks and sites. Examples of these include accommodations such as camping yurts and newly developed enhanced interpretation programs. The proposal did not include any fee increases for current facilities or services consistent with the fee freeze. All requirements of subsection 4(1) of the User Fee Act were met and there was wide spread acceptance of the proposed prices for new services.
On July 1, 2006 and again on January 1, 2008, the Government of Canada implemented a one percent reduction to the GST. This affected all fees as the GST is included in all of Parks Canada approved fees. These reductions are not reflected in the date last modified column as they were not established through the full process, only reduced consistent with Government of Canada direction.
Municipal services, water, sewer and garbage fees are formula-based (except at Riding Mountain National Park) to allow for cost recovery. They may increase or decrease each year in response to changing costs.
Real property rentals are not subject to the User Fees Act and are not included in the table. In 2010-11, real property rental revenues were $ 19,205,221.
A. External Fee |
Service Standard1 |
Performance result |
Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Entry Fees |
85% of visitors are satisfied |
100% of sampled locations exceed the standard | Standard is based on a long standing measure |
Camping Fees |
85% of visitors are satisfied |
100% of sampled locations exceed the standard | Standard is based on a long standing measure |
Lockage and Mooring Fees |
85% of visitors are satisfied |
100% of sampled locations exceed the standard | Standard is based on a long standing measure |
Pools |
85% of visitors are satisfied |
For the 2010 cycle, no locations with this service were surveyed. | Standard is based on a long standing measure |
Municipal Services | For water, the Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality (2002) is the current standard. For wastewater, PCA will meet Federal Guidelines for effluent quality and wastewater (1976) and work towards setting and meeting PCA leadership standards that are based on the receiving waters of each community. Garbage collection frequencies will be established in consultation with Community Councils and Business Community. | Water quality Guidelines are met or exceeded; wastewater effluent quality meets or exceeds Federal Guidelines. | Canadian drinking water guidelines were established in 2002. Federal guidelines for wastewater effluent were established in 1976 and Parks Canada leadership targets established in 1997. The leadership targets are used as the basis for consultation with communities. Garbage collection standards have evolved over time in response to individual community needs and specific frequency of pickups is set in consultation with users. |
Other revenues | 85% of visitors are satisfied | 100% of sampled locations exceed the standard | Standard is based on a long standing measure |
Note:
User Fee: Pardons User fee ($50.00) from 1 April to 28 December and ($150.00) from 29 December to 31 March 2011
Fee Type: Other Products and Services
Fee-setting Authority: Treasury Board Decision #822475 (1995); #826954 (1999); #834603 (2008)
Date Last Modified: Fee introduced 1995, modified in 1999 and in 2010
Performance Standards: Indictable offences (3.5 months); Summary convictions (1.2 months); Proposal to deny/denials (14.7 months)
Performance Results: Adherence to established service standards for the first quarter of 2010-11 were upheld. As a result of the amendments brought to the Criminal Records Act (CRA) in June 2010, service standards prior to the amendments were no longer valid as the Board was not sufficiently funded to deal with the new complexity of work required to process a pardon application.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
1,000 | 1,147 | TBD | 2011-12 | TBD | TBD |
2012-13 | TBD | TBD | |||
2013-14 | TBD | TBD |
Other Information:
On June 29, 2010, Bill C-23A “Limiting Pardons for Serious Crimes Act” came into force, amending the CRA. As a result,pardon program operations have changed significantly due to legislative amendments. With the coming into force of Bill C-23A, the pardon user fee became even further out of alignment with the cost the Board incurs to process a pardon application.
The Minister of Public Safety proposed to increase the pardon user fee to $150, which came into effect on December 29, 2010. The current $150 fee represents an interim measure and only covers a fraction of the costs incurred by the Board to deliver pardon services. The current fee of $150, from which the Board receives $135, covers the Board’s direct costs for work to process a pardon application under the pre-C-23A CRA. It does not cover the additional costs from Bill C-23A, or any other proposed amendments.
The Government is currently seeking to implement an increase to the fee which will respond to workload increases, and costs required to process a pardon application following the recent amendments to the CRA.
The performance standards and results stated above reflect standards and results which existed prior to the implementation of the amended legislation (i.e., the 3 first months of fiscal 2010-11). The performance standards ceased to be valid when the new legislation came into effect as the legislative amendments added greater complexity to the pardon process and thereby lengthened application processing times.
New performance standards, subject to the User Fees Act (UFA), will be implemented as soon as the new fees reflecting the new legislation are approved and implemented. In the meantime, the Board has publicly issued interim performance standards for the benefit of the users.
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA)
Fee Type: Regulatory Service
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act (ATIA)
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. The ATIA provides fuller details: http://lois.justice.gc.ca/en/A-1/.
Performance Results: Response times 100% within Performance Standard: Access to Information Act - Total 54 requests: within 30 days = 44 requests; 31-60 days = 7 requests; 61-120 days = 3 requests; over 121 days = 0 request. Privacy Act - Total 741 requests: within 30 days = 644 requests; 31-60 days = 97 requests; 61-120 days = 0 request; over 121 days = 0 request.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
0 | 0[1] | 264 | 2011-12 | 0 | 264 |
2012-13 | 0 | 264 | |||
2013-14 | 0 | 264 |
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Sub-Total | 1,000 | 1,147 | TBD | 2011-12 | TBD | TBD |
2012-13 | TBD | TBD | ||||
2013-14 | TBD | TBD | ||||
Sub-Total | 0 | 0 | 264 | 2011-12 | 0 | 264 |
2012-13 | 0 | 264 | ||||
2013-14 | 0 | 264 | ||||
Total | 1,000 | 1,147 | TBD | 2011-12 | 0 | 264 |
2012-13 | 0 | 264 | ||||
2013-14 | 0 | 264 |
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Result | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Pardons User fee ($50.00) |
The established service standards were based on the following average processing times for pardon applications:
|
The pardon program adhered to the established service standards[2]. | N/A |
Fee increased from $50 - $150 December 29, 2010 | Under development* | Under development* |
Consistent with the requirements of the UFA, the Board hosted an on-line consultation in April 2009. Only three comments were received during this period; each received an individualized response and no further correspondence was received. As no formal complaints were received during this consultation, it was not necessary to convene an Independent Advisory Panel (IAP) tasked with addressing complaints, as required under the UFA. |
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the ATIA | Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. The ATIA provides fuller details: http://lois.justice.gc.ca/en/A-1/. |
Response times 100% within Performance Standard. Response times 100% within Performance Standard: Access to Information Act - total 54 requests:
Privacy Act - Total 741 requests:
|
The service standard is established by the ATIA and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments done in 1986 and 1992. |
Other Information:
The pardon user fee ($50.00) performance standards and results stated above reflect standards and results which existed prior to the coming into force of Bill C-23A “Limiting Pardons for Serious Crimes Act” on June 29, 2010. These performance standards ceased to be valid when the new legislation came into effect as the legislative amendments added greater complexity to the pardon process and thereby lengthened application processing times.
*New performance standards, subject to the UFA, will be implemented as soon as the new fees reflecting the new legislation are approved and implemented. In the meantime, the Board published on its website and included within its correspondence to partners and stakeholders the following statement concerning standard processing times:
“As a result of the amendments to the CRA in June 2010, service standards proposed by the Parole Board of Canada prior to that date are no longer valid. New service standards, as required under the UFA, will be implemented once a fee reflecting the current costs of processing a pardon are approved and implemented”.
[1] The total user fees collected during the year was $205.00.
[2] Applicable for 1st quarter of year (April – June) until the legislative changes of Bill C-23A came into effect on June 29, 2010.
User Fee: Fees charged for inspection and obtaining of copies of Statutory Instruments in accordance with the Statutory Instruments Act
Fee Type: Regulatory (R)
Fee-setting Authority: Statutory Instruments Act
Date Last Modified: 1993
Performance Standards: 90% of requests will be completed within 5 business days. This standard became effective as of September 2006 and is still in use.
Performance Results: 100% of requests received were completed within 5 business days, with most requests completed within 1 day of receipt.
2010-11 (thousands of dollars) | Planning Years (thousands of dollars) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost* | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
1 | 1 | 10 | 2011-12 | 1 | 10 |
2012-13 | 1 | 11 | |||
2013-14 | 1 | 11 |
* The full cost for the processing of statutory instrument requests filed under the Statutory Instruments Actincludes direct costs to operate the Order in Council Division, including Employee Benefit Plans. It also includes allocations of indirect costs to support the division, such as corporate services, and services received without charge from other departments.
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act
Fee Type: Other Products and Services (O)
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the Access to Information Act. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request.
Performance Results: 94 percent of access requests were completed on time.
2010-11 (thousands of dollars) | Planning Years (thousands of dollars) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost* | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
4 | 4 | 3,933 | 2011-12 | 4 | 4,004 |
2012-13 | 5 | 4,079 | |||
2013-14 | 5 | 4,157 |
* The full cost for the processing of access to information requests filed under the Access to Information Act includes the direct cost to operate the Access to Information and Privacy Division, including Employee Benefit Plans. It also includes indirect costs related to the initial 5-hour search, review and sign-off, services received without charge from other departments and corporate services to support the division.
2010-11 (thousands of dollars) | Planning Years (thousands of dollars) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Subtotal Regulatory | 1 | 1 | 10 | 2011-12 | 1 | 10 |
2012-13 | 1 | 11 | ||||
2013-14 | 1 | 11 | ||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services | 4 | 4 | 3,933 | 2011-12 | 4 | 4,004 |
2012-13 | 5 | 4,079 | ||||
2013-14 | 5 | 4,157 | ||||
Total | 5 | 5 | 3,943 | 2011-12 | 5 | 4,014 |
2012-13 | 6 | 4,090 | ||||
2013-14 | 6 | 4,168 |
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of requests submitted pursuant to the Access to Information Act
Fee Type: Other products and services (O)
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: N/A
Performance Standards: The Department seeks to respond to ATI requests within the legislated timeframes established by the ATI Act.
Performance Results: The Department responded to over 90% of requests made under the Access to Information Act within the legislated timeframes.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
2.5 | 2.0 | 544.4 | 2011-12 | 2.5 | 600 |
2012-13 | 2.6 | 650 | |||
2013-14 | 2.7 | 700 |
Other Information: According to prevailing legal opinion, where the corresponding fee introduction or most recent modification occurred prior to March 31, 2004:
A- User Fee Description | 2009-2010 | Planning Years | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue $ | Estimated Full Cost $ | ||
Fees charged for the processing of access requests under the Access to Information Act (ATIA) Fee type: Other products and services Fee-setting authority: ATIA Date last modified: 1992 |
Forecast revenue: N/A Actual net revenue: $85.00 Full cost: $64,425.64 (salary and O&M) Performance standard: Response provided within 30 days following receipt of the request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of the request The ATIA provides more details: ATIA Performance results: Statutory deadlines have been met for 100% of requests. Extension notices were sent within 30 days following the receipt of the request in 5% of cases |
2010-2011 | 250 | 75,400 |
2011-2012 | 250 | 75,400 | ||
2012-2013 | 250 | 80,000 | ||
B. Date last modified: April 29, 2010 | ||||
C. Other information: It is the practice of the Public Service Commission’s Access to Information and Privacy Office to waive fees where (a) the total reproduction costs that could be assessed amount to less than $25; (b) the information being requested is publicly available; or (c) no response or notice of extension is forwarded within 30 days following receipt of the request. Fees were waived for 19 requests in 2009-2010, amounting to $1,030. |
Supplementary information on Service Standards for External Fees
User Fee: Access to Information
Fee Type: Other Products and Services (O)
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act (ATIA), section 11
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension must be sent within 30 days after receipt of request.
Performance Results: 95.1%
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
9.5 | 11.3 | 3,718.8 | 2011-12 | 9.0 | 3,772.0 |
2012-13 | 9.0 | 3,806.2 | |||
2013-14 | 9.0 | 3,840.9 |
Other Information:
It is the Department’s practice to waive fees where (a) the total costs assessed are less than $25; and (b) the legislative time limits have been exceeded by more than 6 months. In 2010-2011, fees were waived in 54% of the ATI requests in progress, amounting to $8,875 waived.
In an effort to reduce the amount of paper copies and in order to reduce the amount of fees to be paid, applicants can request that the information be provided to them in electronic format, on diskette, CD or via email. In 2010-2011, 28% of responses to ATI requests were provided in electronic format; an increase of 11% compared to the previous fiscal year.
The difference between the forecast revenue and the actual revenue is due to a 22% increase in the number of requests received by the Department in 2010-2011 compared to the previous fiscal year.
A reduction in the revenue is forecasted as of 2011-2012 as the Department now provides the records in electronic format when the photocopying fees assessed are over $25.
User Fee: Esquimalt Graving Dock
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Department of Public Works and Government Services Act Section 23, Esquimalt Graving Dock Regulations (SOR/89-332, SOR/95-642, and SOR/2009-324)
Date Last Modified: 10-December-2009
Performance Standards: Performance standards are published on the Esquimalt Graving Dock client service web site. In addition, regular meetings are held with its tenant clients to ensure customer service and client needs are met.
Performance Results: All performance standards were met in the last fiscal year. The Esquimalt Graving Dock met with all tenant clients on a formal basis every other month (6 times/yr). Additionally, all major vessels were met prior to departure to ensure needs were addressed.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
5,000 | 6,859 | 16,102 | 2011-12 | 6,500 | 17,615 |
2012-13 | 7,000 | 75,886 | |||
2013-14 | 7,500 | 22,499 |
Other Information:
The full costs include significant amounts remedial activities under the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan – 2010/11 $4.6M, 2011/12 $4.2M, 2012/13 $61.9M, 2013/14 $7.8M
Full costs include amortization.
The Esquimalt Graving Dock performance standard is published on the web site where users make facility bookings. (http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/pac/cse-egd/rendement-performance-eng.html)
User Fee: Selkirk Marine Railway Dry Dock (1989)
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Department of Public Works and Government Services Act (1996, c.16) Section 23; Selkirk Marine Railway Dry Dock Regulations, 1989 (SOR/89-331)
Date Last Modified: 1989
Performance Standards:
There are 2 performance standards for SMRDD:
Performance Results:
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
29 | 19 | 60 | 2011-12 | 20 | 61 |
2012-13 | 0 | 0 | |||
2013-14 | 0 | 0 |
Other Information:
User Fee: Subscription rates charged to external/private sector clients for printing and distributing the hardcopy version of the Canada Gazette1
Fee Type: Regulatory (R)
Fee-setting Authority: Subscription fees are set in the Statutory Instruments Regulations
Date Last Modified: Subscription fees last revised in 1985
Performance Standards: Ensure subscribers receive the Canada Gazette in a timely manner and in good condition. Subscribers may call the Government of Canada Publications toll-free line to report and resolve subscription-related issues satisfactorily. If the issue persists, officials from the Canada Gazette Directorate will be advised and asked to address the issue.
Performance Results: 100%: All subscriber-related issues were successfully resolved by calls made to the Government of Canada Publications toll-free line.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
62.0 | 33.32 | 52.9 | 2011-12 | 32.6 | 52.3 |
2012-13 | 32.0 | 52.0 | |||
2013-14 | 31.3 | 51.3 |
Other Information:
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Subtotal Regulatory | 5,091.0 | 6,911.3 | 16,214.9 | 2011-12 | 6,552.6 | 17,728.3 |
2012-13 | 7,032.0 | 75,938.0 | ||||
2013-14 | 7,531.3 | 22,550.3 | ||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services | 9.5 | 11.3 | 3,718.8 | 2011-12 | 9.0 | 3,772.0 |
2012-13 | 9.0 | 3,806.2 | ||||
2013-14 | 9.0 | 3,840.9 | ||||
Total | 5,100.5 | 6,922.6 | 19,933.7 | 2011-12 | 6,561.6 | 21,500.3 |
2012-13 | 7,041.0 | 79,744.2 | ||||
2013-14 | 7,540.3 | 26,391.2 |
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Access to Information | Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension must be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. | 95.1% | No planned change |
Esquimalt Graving Dock |
The Esquimalt Graving Dock (EGD) provided facilities and services to all users and client fleet owners on the basis of the following:
Disputes are referred to first,: Director, Esquimalt Graving Dock, second: Director General Engineering Asset Strategy Directorate , and third: Assistant Deputy Minister – Real Property Associate Deputy Minister – PWGSC. |
The Esquimalt Graving Dock (EGD) met all of the facility’s performance standards in 2010-11.
The EGD holds a valid “Statement of Compliance of a Marine Facility or a Port” under Part 3 of the Marine Transportation Security Regulations. |
Meetings with tenant clients were held bi-monthly to ensure customer service and client needs are met. In addition, all major vessels were met prior to departure to ensure needs were addressed. |
Selkirk Marine Railway Dry Dock |
|
|
Last consultation on User Fees was completed in 1989. Since then, no increases / decreases to user fees have occurred as the Selkirk Marine Railway Dry Dock has been declared non-core to PWGSC’s mandate and identified as surplus to PWGSC’s needs. Stakeholder consultations were carried out when the fees were established in 1989. Since no service standard was set as part of these consultations, two temporary service standards were established. Clients seeking to utilize this facility are consulted on these service standards. Also, as an Offer to Purchase has been made on this facility, clients seeking to utilise this facility in 2011 are advised that this facility may not be available to them and that an agreement with the new owner may be required. |
Subscription rates are charged for the printing and distribution of the Canada Gazette. |
Delivery of the Canada Gazette to subscribers:
If subscribers experience a delay in receiving their issues, they may call the Government of Canada Publications toll-free line at 1-800-635-7943 and a representative will address the situation and take the necessary measures to resolve it satisfactorily. If the Government of Canada Publications toll free line is unable to satisfactorily resolve any issues experienced by subscribers, the issue will be referred to the Canada Gazette Directorate (CGD) who will investigate the situation and take appropriate measures to find a solution. |
100%: CGD’s service standards were met. Any issues relating to the delivery of the Canada Gazette (i.e. quality of the issues and delivery timelines) were satisfactorily resolved by calls made to the Government of Canada Publications toll-free line. There was no intervention from the CGD to resolve issues. |
Stakeholder consultations on subscription rates last took place prior to 1985. Subsequent to these consultations, the subscription rates were increased in 1985. In March 2011, consultations with subscribers took place by way of a client satisfaction study in which a mail-out survey was sent to the 481 Canadian subscribers. One hundred and nineteen subscribers (25%) chose to complete the survey. The questions focused on the CGD’s subscription service standards. Specifically, the respondents were asked about any issues they had experienced when paying for and renewing their subscription, as well as any issues they had experienced with regard to the delivery of their subscription. Among the results obtained:
|
Other Information:
The Esquimalt Graving Dock performance standard is published on the web site where users make facility bookings. (http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/pac/cse-egd/rendement-performance-eng.html)
Should the Selkirk Railway Dry Dock be sold, the Selkirk Marine Railway Dry Dock Regulations will be repealed. Should the sale of this facility not complete, more formal consultation with stakeholders will be held on service standards.
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act
Fee Type: Other Products and Services (O)
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Responses provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the Access to Information Act. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request.
The Access to Information Act provides fuller details.
Performance Results: Statutory deadlines were met 100% of the time.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
10 | 5 | 500 | 2011-12 | 10 | 500 |
2012-13 | 10 | 500 | |||
2013-14 | 10 | 500 |
Other Information: The RCMP External Review Committee receives a very minimal number of Access to Information requests. It received 27 requests in the 2010-11 fiscal year, of which 25 were transferred to another federal institution, and one was all disclosed. The ERC treated one request informally. The ERC collected $5 in fees. The ERC projects that it will receive the same amount of requests for fiscal years 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14.
User Fee: Business Licences
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Firearms Fees Regulations
Date Last Modified: April 10, 2005
Performance Standards: 55 days
Performance Results: 88.4% of properly completed business licence applications were completed within 55 days
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
150.0 |
158.0 |
Section C See note (1) |
2011-12 | 300.0 |
Section C See note (1) |
2012-13 | 210.0 |
Section C See note (1) |
|||
2013-14 | 100.0 |
Section C See note (1) |
Other Information:
User Fee: Individual Licences (see Section B for more information)
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Firearms Fees Regulations
Date Last Modified: December 1, 1988
Performance Standards: 45 days
Performance Results: 98.5% of properly completed individual licence applications were completed within 45 days
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
8,850.3 | 5,221.0 |
Section C See note (1) |
2011-12 | 18,733.7 |
Section C See note (1) |
2012-13 | 17,948.2 |
Section C See note (1) |
|||
2013-14 | 17,118.3 |
Section C See note (1) |
Other Information:
User Fee: Authorizations
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Firearms Fees Regulations
Date Last Modified: December 1, 1998
Performance Standards: 30 days
Performance Results: 97.6% of properly completed Authorizations to Carry (ATC) applications were completed within 30 days
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
335.0 | 230.8 |
Section C See note (1) |
2011-12 | 314.5 |
Section C See note (1) |
2012-13 | 102.7 |
Section C See note (1) |
|||
2013-14 | 160.0 |
Section C See note (1) |
Other Information:
User Fee: Non-resident permits
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Firearms Fees Regulations
Date Last Modified: April 10, 2005
Performance Standards: Section C – Other Information – See note (2)
Performance Results: Section C – Other Information – See note (2)
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
1,900.0 | 1,356.3 |
Section C See note (1) |
2011-12 | 1,900.0 |
Section C See note (1) |
2012-13 | 1,900.0 |
Section C See note (1) |
|||
2013-14 | 1,900.0 |
Section C See note (1) |
Other Information:
User Fee: Services for replacement of documents
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Firearms Fees Regulations
Date Last Modified: April 10, 2005
Performance Standards: 25 days
Performance Results: Section C – Other Information – See note (3)
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
98.5 | 124.9 |
Section C See note (1) |
2011-12 | 113.0 |
Section C See note (1) |
2012-13 | 113.0 |
Section C See note (1) |
|||
2013-14 | 113.0 |
Section C See note (1) |
Other Information:
User Fee: RCMP – Access to Information and Privacy Branch
Fee Type: Regulatory
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act and Regulations
Date Last Modified: 1982
Performance Standards: Government institutions must respond to all formal Access to Information Act requests within the legislated time frame as defined under the Act.
Performance Results: In the last fiscal year, the RCMP processed 89.3% of all Access to Information Act requests received within the legislated time frame.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
10 | 7.6 | 4,315 | 2011-12 | 7.5 |
5,000 |
2012-13 | 7.5 | 5,000 | |||
2013-14 | 7.5 | 5,000 |
Other Information:
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Subtotal Regulatory | 11,343.8 | 7,098.6 |
Section C See note (1) |
2011-12 | 21,368.7 |
Section C See note (1) |
2012-13 | 20,281.4 |
Section C See note (1) |
||||
2013-14 | 19,398.8 |
Section C See note (1) |
||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services | 2011-12 | |||||
2012-13 | ||||||
2013-14 | ||||||
Total | 11,343.8 | 7,098.6 |
Section C See note (1) |
2011-12 | 21,368.7 |
Section C See note (1) |
2012-13 | 20,281.4 |
Section C See note (1) |
||||
2013-14 | 19,398.8 |
Section C See note (1) |
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
ATIP processing fees (which include application, search and reproduction fees) |
All Access to Information Act requests must be complied with as per the legislated time frame set under the Act. | During fiscal year 2010-11, the RCMP ATIP Branch reached a compliance rate of 89.3 % in the processing of all Access to Information Act requests received. | In the course of processing formal requests under the Access to Information Act, the RCMP ATIP Branch regularly consults with various stakeholders which include RCMP policy centres as well as other government institutions. These consultation processes impact at times on our ability to be compliant with the legislated time frame as set under the Act. |
Forecast Revenues:
Note 1. Fee costing studies were conducted in 1995.
Note 2. The Canada Border Services Agency collects information on non-resident permits on behalf of the RCMP.
Note 3. Performance standards were established starting April 1, 2011. Performance results will be reported for FY 2011-12.
User Fee: Statistics Canada Publications
Fee Type: Other goods and services—fee for post-manuscript product
Fee-setting Authority: Ministerial authority to enter into contract
Date Last Modified: April 1996
Performance Standards: Release dates for the next year for all 29 major economic indicators are announced at the end of November of each year. They range from 20 to 60 days from the end of the reference month or quarter. Release dates for the next month for all data output are announced at the end of each month. Release dates for annual and occasional data output normally range from 6 to 18 months, depending on the nature of the data collection process.
Performance Results: The agency published 234 releases of the 29 major economic indicators, all as scheduled. All other data output were released as per the dates announced at the end of each month.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
442.0 | 433.5 | 433.5 | 2011-12 | 350.0 | 350.0 |
2012-13 | 280.0 | 280.0 | |||
2013-14 | 225.0 | 225.0 | |||
Other Information: The number of print publications offered continues to decline as they are replaced by alternative electronic versions available free of charge on the Statistics Canada website. This movement is expected to continue in the next few years. Costs drop as printing and distribution costs are shed. |
User Fee: Online databases
Fee Type: Other goods and services—fee for access
Fee-setting Authority: Ministerial authority to enter into contract
Date Last Modified: September 2001
Performance Standards: New data are to be made available in the CANSIM database every working day at predetermined, pre-announced times. New data are to be made available in the Canadian International Merchandise Trade Database each month at predetermined, pre-announced times.
Performance Results: New data releases took place as per the announced schedule every working day.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
540.0 | 424.4 | 424.4 | 2011-12 | 405.0 | 405.0 |
2012-13 | 385.0 | 385.0 | |||
2013-14 | 365.0 | 365.0 | |||
Other Information: The content of one database and portions of another became free in 2010-11. It is expected that more content will become free in the coming years. |
User Fee: Access to Information Act (ATIA) fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the ATIA
Fee Type: Other goods and services—application fee
Fee-setting Authority: Section 11 of the ATIA
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to Section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. The ATIA provides fuller details: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/A-1/index.html.
Performance Results: Continued to meet statutory requirements under ATI legislation.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
0.5 | 0.9 | 407 | 2011-12 | 0.5 | 407.0 |
2012-13 | 0.5 | 200.0 | |||
2013-14 | 0.5 | 200.0 |
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost | |
Subtotal Regulatory | … | … | … | 2011-12 | … | … |
2012-13 | … | … | ||||
2013-14 | … | … | ||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services | … | … | … | 2011-12 | 755.5 | 1,162.0 |
2012-13 | 665.5 | 865.0 | ||||
2013-14 | 590.5 | 790.0 | ||||
Total | … | … | … | 2011-12 | 755.5 | 1,162.0 |
2012-13 | 665.5 | 865.0 | ||||
2013-14 | 590.5 | 790.0 | ||||
... not applicable |
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Statistics Canada Publications | Release dates for the next year for all 29 major economic indicators are announced at the end of November of each year. They range from 20 to 60 days from the end of the reference month or quarter. Release dates for the next month for all data output are announced at the end of each month. Release dates for annual and occasional data output normally range from 6 to 18 months, depending on the nature of the data collection process. |
The agency published 234 releases of the 29 major economic indicators, all as scheduled. As well, all other data output were released on the dates announced at the end of each month. | Client Satisfaction Survey conducted with a sample of clients in June 2006. Declared level of satisfaction with service was very high |
Online Databases | New data are to be made available in the CANSIM database every working day at pre-announced times. New data are to be made available in the Canadian International Merchandise Trade Database on a monthly basis at pre-determined pre-announced times. | New data releases took place as per the announced schedule every working day. | Usability testing and Client Satisfaction Survey conducted with a sample of clients in early 2005. Declared level of satisfaction with service was very high. |
Access to Information Act (ATIA) fees charged for processing access requests filed under the Access to Information Act |
Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to Section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. The Access to Information Act provides fuller details: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/A-1/index.html. |
Continue to meet statutory requirements under ATI legislation. | The service standard is established by the Access to Information Act and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments done in 1986 and 1992. |
Other Information: Standards of service to the public for all Statistics Canada services were announced in early 2006. Consultations on satisfaction with all major central services were conducted in June 2006. Declared levels of satisfaction with all services were very high. An ongoing assessment of user satisfaction will begin in the fall of 2011. |
2. Fee Type: Other products and services 3. Fee-setting Authority: ATIA 4. Date Last Modified: 1992 5. Performance Standards: Response is to be provided within 30 days following receipt of a request. The response time may be extended pursuant to Section 9 of the ATIA Notice of extension is to be provided within 30 days after receipt of the request. 6. Performance Results:
|
|||||
7. 2010–2011 ($ thousands) | 7. Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
8. Forecast Revenue |
9. Actual Revenue |
10. Full Cost |
Fiscal Year |
11. Forecast Revenue |
12. Estimated Full Cost |
0 | 225.00 | 285,458 | 2011–2012 | 250.00 | 190,000 |
2012–2013 | 300.00 | 190,000 | |||
2013–2014 | 300.00 | 195,000 | |||
SWC collects user fees for information requests in accordance with the ATIA. The total user fees collected in 2010–2011 represent application fees only. For that period, SWC did not collect preparation, search or reproduction fees. In 2010–2011, SWC purchased two perpetual licences of Privasoft Access ProSuite. Note: According to prevailing legal opinion, where the corresponding fee introduction or most recent modification occurred prior to March 31, 2004:
|
User Fee: Sale of Bulletin of Proceedings
Fee Type: Other Products and Services
Fee-setting Authority: Supreme Court Act
Date Last Modified: 2003
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue |
3.5 | 3.9 | 2011-12 | 3.7 |
2012-13 | 3.7 | ||
2013-14 | 3.7 |
User Fee: Sale of Judgments
Fee Type: Other Products and Services
Fee-setting Authority: Supreme Court Act
Date Last Modified: 2003
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue |
4.5 | 2.3 | 2011-12 | 2.3 |
2012-13 | 2.3 | ||
2013-14 | 2.3 |
User Fee: Sale of Certificates
Fee Type: Other Products and Services
Fee-setting Authority: Supreme Court Act
Date Last Modified: 2003
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue |
1.5 | 1.1 | 2011-12 | 1.1 |
2012-13 | 1.1 | ||
2013-14 | 1.1 |
User Fee: Photocopies
Fee Type: Other Products and Services
Fee-setting Authority: Supreme Court Act
Date Last Modified: 2003
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue |
30.0 | 19.9 | 2011-12 | 20.0 |
2012-13 | 20.0 | ||
2013-14 | 20.0 |
User Fee: Other
Fee Type: Other Products and Services
Fee-setting Authority: Supreme Court Act
Date Last Modified: 2003
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue |
70.0 | 68.2 | 2011-12 | 69.0 |
2012-13 | 69.0 | ||
2013-14 | 69.0 |
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | |
Total | 109.5 | 95.4 | 2011-12 | 96.1 |
2012-13 | 96.1 | |||
2013-14 | 96.1 |
Note: User fees are set by the Supreme Court Act, and reporting is not required under the User Fees Act. However, since details of user fees have been reported in the past, they are included here for comparative purposes.
User Fee: Aviation Safety Regulatory Fees
Fee Type: Regulatory Service
Fee-setting Authority:
Aeronautics Act
Canadian Aviation Regulations (CARs) — CARs fees
Fees in Part I, subpart 4
Date Last Modified: July 15, 2000
Subsequent amendments to regulations and/or fee reductions, if any, did not trigger the User Fees Act.
Performance Standards:
Civil Aviation’s Service Standards
Service Charter
Performance Results:
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
8,158 | 7,613 | 69,046 | 2011-12 | 8,138 | 61,687 |
2012-13 | 8,133 | 61,019 | |||
2013-14 | 8,133 | 61,046 |
Other Information:
Documentation on service standards was published in April 2010. A communication strategy has been activated to raise awareness among stakeholders and Transport Canada Civil Aviation employees.
A complaint mechanism has been developed and implemented for service standards related to the Canadian Aviation Regulations CAR 104 Charges (i.e., Civil Aviation Issues Reporting System [CAIRS]).
As of 2010-2011, revised costing and reporting approaches were developed as a result of more detailed financial information available within Civil Aviation. The new reporting Program Activity Architecture that was introduced in 2009-2010 allows a further segregation of costs, including those related to CARS user charges. In prior years, Full Civil Aviation Costs were reported due to insufficient validation of the 1999 percentage (27.4 percent) to establish costs of services related to CARS user charges.
Consistent with public consultations conducted in the past, full or partial costs of services such as monitoring compliance, enforcing safety operational standards, establishing legislation, regulations and standards, etc., were considered to benefit the general taxpayer. Only the costs associated with issuing Transport Canada safety documents (certificate, licence, permit, etc.) were considered a private benefit attributable to the document recipient.
User Fee: Marine Safety Regulatory Fees (inspections, surveys, services, etc.)
Fee Type: Regulatory Service
Fee-setting Authority:
Date Last Modified: May 1, 2002
Subsequent amendments to regulations and/or fee reductions did not trigger the User Fees Act.
Performance Standards: Service Standards for Marine Safety’s Fees
Performance Results:
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
7,325 | 7,129 | 81,056 | 2011-12 | 7,088 | 74,533 |
2012-13 | 6,987 | 72,430 | |||
2013-14 | 6,889 | 72,302 |
Other Information:
A complaint mechanism policy, "Handling of complaints related to Marine Safety User Fees and applicable service standards," is available on Transport Canada’s website.
As of 2010-2011, revised costing and reporting approaches were developed as a result of more specific financial information available within Marine Safety as a result of the new reporting Program Activity Architecture introduced in 2009-2010 that allowed a further segregation of costs related to the Marine Safety Regulatory Fees.
Consistent with public consultations conducted in the past, full or partial costs of services such as monitoring compliance, enforcing safety operational standards, establishing legislation, regulations and standards, pollution prevention, etc. were considered to benefit the general taxpayer.
User Fee: Marine Safety — Ship Radio Inspection Program
Fee Type: Regulatory Service
Fee-setting Authority:
Date Last Modified: 1978
Subsequent amendments to regulations and/or fee reductions did not trigger the User Fees Act.
Performance Standards: Consistent with the Fisheries and Oceans Canada publication, Part IV of Radio Aids to Marine Navigation, a ship radio inspection service will be provided within three working days following a request from a client.
Performance Results: Radio inspection services are provided more than 90 percent of the time within three working days following such a request. As some clients’ ships operate on a fixed schedule, such a request may be made a week or more in advance of the requested inspection date.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
48 | 83 | 970 | 2011-12 | 48 | 970 |
2012-13 | 48 | 970 | |||
2013-14 | 48 | 970 |
Other Information:
A complaint mechanism policy, "Handling of complaints related to Marine Safety User Fees and applicable service standards," is available on Transport Canada’s website.
Funding of the Ship Radio Inspection Program is covered by a memorandum of understanding between Transport Canada, and Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Revenues from user fees represent the full cost recovery of overtime and travel costs. Full Costs include also the costs for the program manager, a share of internal services costs and amortization costs of the ship radio inspection equipment.
User Fee: Airport Fees — Air Services Charges Regulations
(General Terminal Fees, Landing Fees, Aircraft Parking Charges, Emergency Response Services Charges)
Fee Type: Other Products and Services
Fee-setting Authority:
Date Last Modified: January 1, 2003
Subsequent amendments to regulations and/or fee reductions, if any, did not trigger the User Fees Act.
Performance Standards: Airports National Service Standards are available on the Transport Canada website.
Performance Results: Performance met the standards more than 90 percent of the time. Refer to Airports Performance Measurements for 2010-2011
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
5,246 | 5,352 | 15,869 | 2011-12 | 5,359 | 12,568 |
2012-13 | 5,400 | 12,568 | |||
2013-14 | 5,450 | 12,568 |
Other Information:
Data exclude revenues and costs from divested and leased airports. Consistent with public consultations conducted in the past, Full Costs reported do not reflect annualized capital costs ($2 million) in recognition of the fact that smaller airports may not have the necessary critical mass of traffic to fully pay for these large up-front infrastructure costs, i.e., start-up costs.
A complaint mechanism has been implemented through feedback and, more specific procedures within each standard, on the Transport Canada website for service standards related to airports operated by Transport Canada or on its behalf.
User Fee: Airport Fees — Annual Registration of Mobile Equipment
Fee Type: Other Products and Services
Fee-setting Authority:
Date Last Modified: February 24, 2004
Subsequent amendments to regulations and/or fee reductions, if any, did not trigger the User Fees Act.
Performance Standards: Airports National Service Standards are available on the Transport Canada website.
Performance Results: Performance met the standards more than 90 percent of the time. Refer to Airports Performance Measurements for 2010-2011
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
1 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 2011-12 | 0.2 | 0.6 |
2012-13 | 0.2 | 0.6 | |||
2013-14 | 0.2 | 0.6 |
Other Information:
A complaint mechanism has been implemented through feedback and, more specific procedures within each standard, on the Transport Canada website for service standards related to airports operated by Transport Canada or on its behalf and are also built as part of each service standard.
User Fee: Airport Vehicle Parking Charges
Fee Type: Other Products and Services
Fee-setting Authority:
Date Last Modified: November 19, 1998
Subsequent amendments to regulations and/or fee reductions, if any, did not trigger the User Fees Act.
Performance Standards: Airports National Service Standards are available on the Transport Canada website.
Performance Results: Performance met the standards more than 90 percent of the time. Refer to Airports Performance Measurements for 2010-2011
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
275 | 370 | 1,628 | 2011-12 | 267 | 1,289 |
2012-13 | 274 | 1,289 | |||
2013-14 | 281 | 1,289 |
Other Information:
Data exclude revenues and costs from divested and leased airports. Consistent with public consultations conducted in the past, Full Costs reported do not reflect annualized capital costs in recognition of the fact that smaller airports may not have the necessary critical mass of traffic to fully pay for up-front infrastructure costs, i.e., start-up costs.
A complaint mechanism has been implemented through feedback and, more specific procedures within each standard, on the Transport Canada website for service standards related to airports operated by Transport Canada or on its behalf and are also built as part of each service standard.
User Fee: Public Port Fees (Wharfage & Transfers, Berthage, Storage, Harbour Dues, Utilities and Other Services)
Fee Type: Other Products and Services
Fee-setting Authority:
Canada Marine Act
Public Port Fees
Date Last Modified: January 1, 2004
Performance Standards: Public Ports and Public Port Facilities National Service Standards are posted on Transport Canada’s website
Performance Results: Performance met the standards more than 90 percent of the time. Refer to Public Port and Public Port Facilities Performance Measurements for 2010-2011.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
7,659 | 8,238 | 33,603 | 2011-12 | 8,065 | 27,336 |
2012-13 | 8,149 | 27,100 | |||
2013-14 | 8,171 | 27,344 |
Other Information:
A complaint mechanism has been implemented through feedback on Transport Canada’s website for service standards related to public ports and public port facilities. Other dispute mechanisms are in place and built into each service standard.
User Fee: Access to Information Requests — Fees
Fee Type: Other Products and Services
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act and related regulations
Date Last Modified: 1992
Subsequent amendments to the Act and regulations did not trigger the User Fees Act.
Performance Standards: Service Standards are included in the Access to information Act, section 7. Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the act. Notice of extension is to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request.
Performance Results: Statutory deadlines have been met for 40 percent of requests. One hundred percent of extension notices were sent within 30 days following the receipt of the request. One hundred percent of transfer notices were sent within 15 days.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
5 | 7 | 2,516 | 2011-12 | 5 | 2,455 |
2012-13 | 5 | 2,455 | |||
2013-14 | 5 | 2,455 |
Other Information:
The Access to Information Act has provisions to waive fees where the total owing per request amounts to less than $25.00, or when the request has not been answered within the legislated time frames and additional costs would apply, or where there is a public interest in the disclosure.
The complaint mechanism is described under section 30 of the Act.
Cost information is based on the Statistical Reports on the Access to Information Act. User Fee financial information includes adjustments to a full cost base in accordance with the Treasury Board Secretariat’s Guide to Costing.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue [3] |
Actual Revenue [3] |
Full Cost [2] |
Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue [3] [4] |
Estimated Full Cost [2] |
|
Subtotal Regulatory | 15,531 | 14,825 | 151,072 | 2011-12 | 15,274 | 137,190 |
2012-13 | 15,168 | 134,419 | ||||
2013-14 | 15,070 | 134,318 | ||||
Subtotal Other Products and Services | 13,185 | 13,967 | 53,617 | 2011-12 | 13,696 | 43,649 |
2012-13 | 13,828 | 43,413 | ||||
2013-14 | 13,907 |
43,657 | ||||
Total | 28,716 | 28,792 | 204,689 | 2011-12 | 28,970 |
180,839 |
2012-13 | 28,996 | 177,832 | ||||
2013-14 | 28,977 | 177,975 |
Due to rounding, columns may not add to totals shown.
Notes
[1] The department collects two types of fees: Regulatory Services (R), and Other Products and Services (O).
[2] Full Costs (Actual and Estimates) are reported on an accrual basis. They represent the full cost of providing a service, good, facility or privilege. Full cost is not necessarily the cost attributed to fee-paying clients and a lower cost recovery level may be required based on the economic impact on stakeholders, stakeholders’ ability to pay, the degree to which a price may affect the achievement of public policy objectives, etc.
Consistent with instructions for the Departmental Performance Report, Full Costs are calculated according to costing principles identified in the Treasury Board's Guide to Costing, revised in May 2008.
Full Costs are defined as "The sum of all costs, direct and indirect, incurred by the government in the supply of a good, service, property, or right or privilege, including: services provided without charge by other departments (e.g., accommodation, legal services); costs financed by separate authorities (e.g., some employee benefits); annualized capital costs; and financing costs for revolving funds as relevant to departments. However, since the primary focus of this guide is full costing for cost recovery, transfer payments have not been included."
[3] Figures reported on a cash basis. Three-Year Revenues Forecasts identified were those reported in the Annual Reference Level Update for 2011-2012.
[4] According to prevailing legal opinion, where the corresponding fee introduction or most recent modification occurred prior to March 31, 2004:
[5] Main achievement in improving service and to ensure Citizen-Focused Services as assessed under the Management Accountability Framework process:
External Fee | Service Standard [1] | Performance Results [2] | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Aviation Safety — Regulatory Fees |
Ontario Region: results for Services with Fees Other performance results are under development; implementation is being phased in. Training has been completed in the Ontario and Atlantic regions. The Atlantic region formally began using the performance tracking system in April 2011. Plans for implementation in r two other regions in 2011-2012 include the Prairie and Northern Region, and the Pacific Region. |
Documentation on Services Standards was published in April 2010. A communication strategy has been activated to raise awareness of stakeholders through Canadian Aviation Regulation Advisory Council meetings and Transport Canada Civil Aviation employees through training sessions and other communication channels. Ongoing feedback (and consultations as required) is done through the Council meetings and Transport Canada’s website for service standards related to the Canadian Aviation Regulations CAR 104 charges using the Civil Aviation Issues Reporting System feedback application. Review of the 2010-2011 feedback through this Reporting System and the Council is satisfactory and the new service charter is supported. The new service charter was published in 2010 and performance tracking has not been implemented in all regions yet. A periodic review of existing standards in full consultation with stakeholders is expected every 5 years with the next review planned for 2013/14. | |
Marine Safety — Regulatory Fees for inspections, surveys, services, etc. | Marine Safety’s Service Standards |
|
Ongoing feedback is received through Transport Canada’s website (a complaint mechanism is in place) and meetings with the Canadian Marine Advisory Council. All proposals for changes are subject to public consultations through Transport Canada’s website, the Canada Gazette and Council meetings. No changes were identified or required in 2010-2011. Consultations will follow the presentation to management of measurable service standards planned for the fall of 2011. Broader consultations are also carried out on an ad hoc basis for various issues, depending on stakeholders’ feedback or departmental priorities. The planned frequency for review is every five years from 2011-2012. |
Marine Safety — Ship Radio Inspection Program |
Consistent with Fisheries and Oceans Canada publication, Part IV of Radio Aids to Marine Navigation, a ship radio inspection service will be provided within three working daysfollowing a request from a client. |
Radio inspection services are provided more than 90 percent of the time within three working days following such a request. As some clients’ ships operate on a fixed schedule, such a request may be made a week or more in advance of the requested inspection date. | Ongoing feedback is received through Transport Canada’s website (a complaint mechanism is in place) and meetings with the Canadian Marine Advisory Council. No changes were identified or required in 2010-2011. All proposals for changes are subject to public consultations via Transport Canada’s website, the Canada Gazette and Council meetings. Consultations will follow the presentation to management of measurable service standards planned for the fall of 2011. The planned frequency for review is every five years from 2011-2012. Broader consultations are also carried out on an ad hoc basis for various issues depending on stakeholders’ feedback or departmental priorities. |
Airports — Air Services Charges Regulations (ASCR) fees: General Terminal Fees, Landing Fees, Aircraft Parking Charges, Emergency Response Services Charges | Airports National Service Standards |
Airports Performance Measurement for 2010/11 Performance met standards more than 90 percent of the time. |
Consistent with approach used in 2006, when first implementing service standards, ongoing stakeholder consultations and feedback are managed through existing channels (e.g. tenant meetings, comment cards, etc.) at the various sites and on Transport Canada’s web site. Reviews of 2010-2011 feedback have been satisfactory and no outstanding issues have been reported. In 2011-2012, stakeholders feedback will continue to be managed through the existing channels at various sites and using Transport Canada’s website. Service standards were reviewed in 2010 as part of the Departmental Service Implementation Team initiative as a result of the Treasury Board Service Policy and section 20 of the Management Accountability Framework, "Citizen-Focused Service." No changes were required. A periodic review of existing standards in full consultation with stakeholders is expected every five years with the next review planned for 2014/15. |
Airports — Annual Registration of Mobile Equipment used at Airports | Airports National Service Standards |
Airports Performance Measurement for 2010/11 Performance met standards more than 90 percent of the time. |
Consistent with approach used in 2006, when first implementing service standards, ongoing stakeholder consultations and feedback are managed through existing channels (e.g. tenant meetings, comment cards, etc.) at the various sites and on Transport Canada’s web site. Stakeholder relationships are important and valued. Reviews of 2010-2011 feedback have been satisfactory and no outstanding issues reported. In 2011-2012, stakeholders feedback will continue to be managed through the existing channels at various sites and using Transport Canada’s website. Service standards reviewed in 2010 as part of the Departmental Service Implementation Team initiative as a result of Treasury Board Secretariat Service Policy and the Management Accountability Framework on Citizen-Focused Service. No changes were required. A periodic review of existing standards in full consultations with stakeholders is expected every 5 years with the next review planned for 2014/15. |
Airports — Vehicle Parking Charges | Airports National Service Standards |
Airports Performance Measurement for 2010/11 Performance met standards more than 90 percent of the time. |
Consistent with approach used in 2006, when first implementing service standards, ongoing stakeholder consultations and feedback are managed through existing channels (e.g. tenant meetings, comment cards, etc.) at the various sites and on Transport Canada’s web site. Stakeholder relationships are important and valued. Reviews of 2010-2011 feedback have been satisfactory and no outstanding issues reported. In 2011-2012, stakeholders feedback will continue to be managed through the existing channels at various sites and using Transport Canada’s website. Service standards reviewed in 2010 as part of the Departmental Service Implementation Team initiative as a result of Treasury Board Secretariat Service Policy and the Management Accountability Framework on Citizen-Focused Service. No changes were required. A periodic review of existing standards in full consultations with stakeholders is expected every 5 years with the next review planned for 2014/15. |
Ports — Public Port Revenues: Utility Charges, Wharfage, Berthage, Storage and Harbour Dues | Public Ports National Service Standards |
Public Ports and Public Port Facilities Performance Measurements for 2010-2011 Performance met standards more than 90 percent of the time. |
Ongoing feedback is possible through Transport Canada’s website. Feedback from stakeholders relates to one element of the Utilities and Other Services Charges (costs of meeting security requirements). A plan to address inconsistencies in the application of the security charge is currently being implemented. Reviews of 2010-2011 feedback have been satisfactory and no other outstanding issues reported. |
Access to Information Requests — Fees |
Service standards are in the Access to Information Act, section 7 Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the Access to Information Act. Notice of extension is to be sent within 30 days after receipt of the request. |
Statutory deadlines were met for 40 percent of requests. One hundred percent of extension notices were sent within 30 days following receipt of the request. One hundred percent of transfer notices were sent within 15 days. |
The service standard is established by the Access to Information Act and the Access to Information Regulations. There has been no requirement for changes at this point. Consultations are not carried out by Transport Canada as fees and service standards were not introduced by this department. However, the last consultations were in 2010 and had no impact on fees and no impact on service standards. Complaint mechanism is described under section 30 of the Act. |
Other Information:
Main achievement in improving service and to ensure Citizen-Focused Services as assessed under the Management Accountability Framework process:
The User Fees Act and the Treasury Board Policy on Service Standards for External Fees do not include any specific requirement for measuring client satisfaction other than the need for service standards to be developed in consultation with paying and non-paying stakeholders and the reporting of performance. Ongoing feedback and consultations are possible through Transport Canada’s website.
Transport Canada, in its commitment to provide quality services and client satisfaction, has implemented dispute mechanisms. This initiative ensures that stakeholders’ concerns and complaints are handled immediately by the various groups and redress mechanisms undertaken as appropriate.
Internet website links to various groups' feedback and dispute mechanisms are identified within each group of User Fees reported in Section A and also identified in the External Fee reporting Section C.
Service standards, performance reporting and client satisfaction are also reviewed as part of the Departmental Service Implementation Team initiative as a result of TBS Service Policy and MAF Citizen-Focused Service.
[1] As established pursuant to the Policy on Service Standards for External Fees:
[2] Performance results are not legally subject to section 5.1 of the User Fees Act regarding fee reductions for unachieved performance.
Note: The Internet links for User Fees and regulatory charges may change following publication of the Departmental Performance Report since the various websites are updated regularly.
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of requests under the Access to Information Act (ATIA)
Fee Type: Other products and services
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: 1992
2010–11 Actual Revenue ($): 325
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of access to information requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA)
Fee Type: Other products and services (O)
Fee-Setting Authority: ATIA
Date Last Modified: 2005
Performance Standards: Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension is to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request.
Performance Results: Statutory deadlines were met 97 per cent of the time.
2010-11 ($ thousands) | Planning Years ($ thousands) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
$1.5 | $1.8 | $372 | 2011-12 | $1.7 | $620 |
2012-13 | $1.8 | $630 | |||
2013-14 | $1.9 | $640 |
Note: According to prevailing legal opinion, where the corresponding fee introduction or most recent modification occurred prior to March 31, 2004:
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Fees charged for the processing of access to information requests. | Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension is to be sent within 30 days after receipt of the request. | Statutory deadlines met 97 per cent of the time. | The service standard is established by the ATIA and related regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken for amendments in 1986, 1992 and 2005. |
Note: As established pursuant to the Policy on Service Standards for External Fees:
User Fee: Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA)
Fee Type: Other products and services (O)
Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act
Date Last Modified: 1992
Performance Standards: Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request.
Performance Results:
($)2010-11 | Planning Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecast Revenue | Actual Revenue | Full Cost | Fiscal Year | Forecast Revenue | Estimated Full Cost |
500 | 103 | 205 | 2011-12 | 250 | 500 |
2012-13 | 250 | 500 | |||
2013-14 | 250 | 500 |
External Fee | Service Standard | Performance Results | Stakeholder Consultation |
---|---|---|---|
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA). |
Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request. |
Application fees = $70.00 WD provided a final response on 15 requests within 30 days of receipt. Extension notices were sent within 30 days of receipt of the request on 100% of the files (4 requests) where consultations were required. In addition to the $5.00 application fees refunded, WD waived $102.00 for reproduction fees for releases of less than 125 pages, or alternate formats. Reproduction fees applied to 1 request only, totalling $38.00. |
The service standard is established by the Access to Information Act and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments done in 1986 and 1992. |