ARCHIVED - Infrastructure Canada - Supplementary Tables
This page has been archived.
Archived Content
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
2009-10
Departmental Performance Report
Infrastructure Canada
Supplementary Information (Tables)
Table of Contents
- Details on Transfer Payments Programs
- Horizontal Initiatives
- Green Procurement
- Response to Parliamentary Committees and External Audits
- Internal Audits and Evaluations
Details on Transfer Payment Programs (TPPs)
Infrastructure Canada manages the following transfer payment programs:
- Contributions under the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF);
- Contributions under the Border Infrastructure Fund (BIF);
- Contributions under the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF);
- Transfer Payments under the Gas Tax Fund (GTF);
- Transfer Payments under the Provincial-Territorial Base Funding Program (PT Base);
- Contributions under the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component;
- Contributions under the Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component;
- Contributions under the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up;
- Contributions under the Research, Knowledge and Outreach Program;
- Contributions under the Green Infrastructure Fund;
- Contributions under the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund;
- Contributions under the Support for the G8 Summit 2010; and
- Contributions under the National Trails Coalition Fund.
As prescribed by the Policy on Transfer Payments, as of June 30, 2009 the summary of the Three-Year Plan for Transfer Payment Programs is available at: http://www.infc.gc.ca/pd-dp/tpp-ppt/index-eng.html.
Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund
2. Start Date: 2003-2004
3. End Date: 2012-2013
4. Description: Directed to projects of major federal and regional significance in areas that are vital to sustaining economic growth and enhancing the quality of life of Canadians.
5. Strategic Outcome: Funding for quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians in a competitive economy, a cleaner environment and liveable communities is provided.
6. Results Achieved: In 2009-2010, Infrastructure Canada continued to manage and monitor the progresses of 41 projects, representing a total federal allocation of over $3 billion and almost $9 billion in total project costs. These projects were in categories such as highways or rail infrastructure, local transportation, tourism and urban development, advanced telecommunication and high-speed broadband, water and sewage treatment and northern infrastructure.
Out of the 41 ongoing projects, seven projects representing a total federal allocation of almost $300 million, started construction. These seven projects represents almost $700 million in total cost. Among these seven projects, two signed their contribution agreements in 2009-2010 (Corner Brook Waterfront and Hamilton Harbour Clean Up). The contribution agreement for Conception Bay South Bypass was also signed during this fiscal year, but the construction phase of this project is scheduled to start in the next fiscal year. The total federal contribution of this project is of $6.5 million and has total project cost of $17.2 million.
In 2009-2010, seven projects were completed. These projects received over $375 million in total federal contribution and represented nearly $1.3 billion in total cost.
13. Program Activity: Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund.
| 7. Actual Spending 2007-2008 | 8. Actual Spending 2008-2009 | 9. Planned Spending 2009-2010 | 10. Total Authorities 2009-2010 | 11. Actual Spending 2009-2010 | 12. Variances | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14. Total Grants | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 14. Total Contributions | $922.4 | $505.4 | $513.4 | $648.9 | $419.6 | $229.3 |
| 14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 15. Total Program Activity(ies) | $922.4 | $505.4 | $513.4 | $648.9 | $419.6 | $229.3 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to contribution agreements being signed later than anticipated, and for decreased cash flow requirements for existing agreements.
17. Audit completed or planned: The Audit of the Management Control Framework of the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund was completed in 2007-2008.Please refer to this website for details: http://www.infc.gc.ca/pd-dp/ia-vi/mcf-finrep-ccg-rapfin-eng.html. There are currently no new audits planned.
18. Evaluation completed or planned: A joint formative evaluation of the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund and the Border Infrastructure Fund was completed in 2009. Please refer to the web site for more information: http://www.infc.gc.ca/pd-dp/eval/20090205csifbif-fcisfif-eng.html. A joint Strategic Evaluation of the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund and the Border Infrastructure Fund is planned, and the expected completion date is 2012-2013.
Border Infrastructure Fund
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Border Infrastructure Fund
2. Start Date: 2003-2004
3. End Date: 2013-2014
4. Description: This fund targets Canada-United States border crossing points and activity funding for investments in physical infrastructure, intelligent transportation system infrastructure and improved analytical capacity.
5. Strategic Outcome: Funding for quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians in a competitive economy, a cleaner environment and liveable communities is provided.
6. Results Achieved: To date, the entire $675 million funding under the Border Infrastructure Fund has been committed for 11 projects accounting for a total investment of more than $1 billion for all partners. In partnership with Infrastructure Canada, Transport Canada completed projects worth over $80 million in federal contributions under the Border Infrastructure Fund to help improve the safety and efficiency of the transportation network leading to our international borders. During the course of the fiscal year, projects from provinces across Canada were completed including:
- Final components of the St. Stephen Bypass including a four-lane section of Route 1 from Church Street to the new Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) border crossing and a new international bridge between New Brunswick and Maine;
- Intelligent Transportation System in Windsor;
- Construction of the Walker Road Rail Grade Separation in the Windsor-Essex corridor in Ontario;
- Geotechnical Studies to support the Detroit River International Crossing Project;
- Environmental assessment and detailed design for the widening of County Road 19 (Manning Road) from Hwy 401 to County Road 22;
- Highway 39 North Portal, Saskatchewan;
- Highway 401 Widening - Puce Road to Belle River Road, in Ontario; and
- Highway 402 reconstruction between Lambton Road 26 and Highway 21, Phase 1 in Ontario.
13. Program Activity: Border Infrastructure Fund.
| 7. Actual Spending 2007-2008 | 8. Actual Spending 2008-2009 | 9. Planned Spending 2009-2010 | 10. Total Authorities 2009-2010 | 11. Actual Spending 2009-2010 | 12. Variances | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14. Total Grants | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 14. Total Contributions | $69.9 | $81.1 | $66.7 | $100.0 | $80.8 | $19.2 |
| 14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 15. Total Program Activity(ies) | $69.9 | $81.1 | $66.7 | $100.0 | $80.8 | $19.2 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): Economic conditions caused construction costs to be lower than anticipated, thus resulting in lower than expected bids on tenders. Furthermore, regulatory compliance and requirements on contract amendments resulted in project delays.
17. Audit completed or planned: The Audit of the Management Control Framework of the Border Infrastructure Fund was completed in 2007-2008. Please refer to this web site for details: http://www.infc.gc.ca/pd-dp/ia-vi/mcf-finrep-ccg-rapfin-eng.html. There are currently no new audits planned.
18. Evaluation completed or planned: A joint formative evaluation of the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund and the Border Infrastructure Fund was completed in 2009. Please refer to the web site for more information: http://www.infc.gc.ca/pd-dp/eval/20090205csifbif-fcisfif-eng.html. A joint Strategic Evaluation of the Border Infrastructure Fund and the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund is planned, and the expected completion date is 2012-2013.
Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund
2. Start Date: 2004-2005
3. End Date: 2013-2014
4. Description: Federal funding is provided to support municipal infrastructure projects to improve the quality of life sustainable development and economic opportunities of smaller communities.
5. Strategic Outcome: Funding for quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians in a competitive economy, a cleaner environment and liveable communities is provided.
6. Results Achieved: Under the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF) program, the federal government is contributing more than $1 billion for over 2,000 projects, with a total project value of $2.5 billion. While the program is substantially completed with respect to project selection, construction continues across Canada for many of these projects.
The main project categories;of investment under the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund, based on total federal funding were: Wastewater Infrastructure with $31.8 million of total federal funding, followed closely by Water Infrastructure with 28.1% of total federal funding, while Local Road Infrastructure ranked third, with 14.5% of total federal funding. The remaining 25.6% in total federal funding under the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund were spread among the following project categories: Community Energy Systems, Connectivity, Culture, Municipal Capacity Building, Public Transit, Recreation, Service, Solid Waste Management and Tourism Infrastructure.
In 2009-2010, 81 projects were approved under this program. These are not the result of new funding injected in the program, but from money becoming available after previously approved projects were cancelled. The total federal allocation for these 81 projects represented $18.9 million for a total projects value of $58.5 million.
13. Program Activity: Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund.
| 7. Actual Spending 2007-2008 | 8. Actual Spending 2008-2009 | 9. Planned Spending 2009-2010 | 10. Total Authorities 2009-2010 | 11. Actual Spending 2009-2010 | 12. Variances | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14. Total Grants | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 14. Total Contributions | $143.3 | $220.3 | $483.8 | $483.8 | $221.2 | $262.6 |
| 14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 15. Total Program Activity(ies) | $143.3 | $220.3 | $483.8 | $483.8 | $221.2 | $262.6 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to decreased cash-flow requirements for existing contribution agreements.
17. Audit completed or planned: An Assurance Audit of the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund is in progress is expected to be completed in 2010.
18. Evaluation completed or planned: A joint Strategic Evaluation of the Municipal Rural Strategic Infrastructure Fund and the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component is planned, and the expected completion date is 2011-2012.
Gas Tax Fund
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Gas Tax Fund
2. Start Date: 2005-2006
3. End Date: Ongoing
4. Description: The Gas Tax Fund program strives to meet the diverse infrastructure needs of all communities while contributing to national environmental outcomes. The Gas Tax Fund makes capital investments in environmentally sustainable municipal infrastructure to improve water and air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. It is designed to build competitive and sustainable communities by providing reliable, predictable up-front funding for eligible investments in water, wastewater, solid waste, public transit, community energy systems, local roads and bridges, and capacity-building.
5. Strategic Outcome: Provinces, territories and municipalities have federal financial support for their infrastructure priorities.
6. Results Achieved: In fiscal year 2009-2010, Infrastructure Canada managed the implementation of Gas Tax Fund agreements, including the coordination and collaboration with provinces, territories and municipalities for its administration. It completed amendments to the Gas Tax Fund agreements to extend funding until 2014 and determined annual transfer payment allocations for the extension period, thereby allowing for predictable, long-term infrastructure planning. Furthermore, Infrastructure Canada supported all signatories in developing their Outcomes Reports and reviewed the 13 of those reports that were published during 2009-2010. The department held National Workshops to further partnerships with stakeholders and address horizontal issues.
In 2009-2010, Infrastructure Canada transferred Gas Tax Funding, via signatories, to over 3,600 Canadian municipalities.
13. Program Activity: Gas Tax Fund.
| 7. Actual Spending 2007-2008 | 8. Actual Spending 2008-2009 | 9. Planned Spending 2009-2010 | 10. Total Authorities 2009-2010 | 11. Actual Spending 2009-2010 | 12. Variances | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14. Total Grants | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 14. Total Contributions | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $778.2 | $984.8 | $1,975.0 | $1,975.0 | $1,872.4 | $102.6 |
| 15. Total Program Activity(ies) | $778.2 | $984.8 | $1,975.0 | $1,975.0 | $1,872.4 | $102.6 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): Conditions for payment in 2007-2008 for three provinces/territories were only met in 2008-2009, and therefore funding was carried forward to 2008-2009. Some funding was carried forward to 2009-2010 because the conditions for payment for 2008-2009 for two provinces/territories were not met.
17. Audit completed or planned: An Assurance Audit of the Gas Tax Fund Management Control Framework was completed in June 2009. Please refer to this web site for details: http://www.infc.gc.ca/pd-dp/ia-vi/gtf-fte-eng.html. There are currently no new audits planned.
18. Evaluation completed or planned: A joint National Summative Evaluation of the Gas Tax Fund (GTF) and the Public Transit Fund (PTF) was completed in August 2009. Please refer to this web site for details: http://www.infc.gc.ca/pd-dp/eval/nse-esn/nse-esn-eng.html. A joint Strategic Evaluation of the Provincial-Territorial Base Fund and the Gas Tax Fund is planned, and the expected completion date is 2012-2013.
Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Base Fund
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Base Fund
2. Start Date: 2007-2008
3. End Date: 2013-2014
4. Description: These funds will provide greater flexibility to address infrastructure needs, particularly for the benefit of smaller jurisdictions which need to respond to basic needs regardless of the size of their populations.
5. Strategic Outcome: Provinces, territories and municipalities have federal financial support for their infrastructure priorities.
6. Results Achieved: In fiscal year 2009-2010, with the exception of Ontario, Infrastructure Canada concluded Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Base Fund (PT-Base Fund) funding agreements with all jurisdictions that had not yet signed agreements. The federal government also negotiated and concluded agreements to allow for program acceleration with the following eight jurisdictions: Alberta, British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Quebec, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and Northwest Territories.
In fiscal year 2009-2010, Infrastructure Canada approved 20 Capital Plans, covering all jurisdictions, except Ontario. Collectively, these Capital Plans resulted in federal funding commitments of more than $1,104 million and more than $1,648 million leveraged from funding partners for 318 initiatives. During fiscal year 2009-2010 more than $671 million was transferred to provinces and territories.
In terms of funds committed during fiscal year 2009-2010 for approved initiatives, by far the category for which the most federal funds were accessed was national highway system infrastructure, followed by water and wastewater infrastructure. While these types of infrastructure investments remain a key priority for jurisdictions during 2009-2010, a number of provinces and territories submitted Capital Plans that also included priority initiatives in other infrastructure categories including sport, culture and tourism as well as green energy, shortline rail and short-sea shipping infrastructure, local and regional airports, connectivity and broadband, solid waste management and disaster mitigation.
13. Program Activity: Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Base Fund.
| 7. Actual Spending 2007-2008 | 8. Actual Spending 2008-2009 | 9. Planned Spending 2009-2010 | 10. Total Authorities 2009-2010 | 11. Actual Spending 2009-2010 | 12. Variances | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14. Total Grants | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 14. Total Contributions | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $ | $390.6 | $823.6 | $771.8 | $671.9 | $100.0 |
| 15. Total Program Activity(ies) | $ | $390.6 | $823.6 | $771.8 | $671.9 | $100.0 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): Actual spending was lower than planned due to delays in the signing of a funding agreement in one jurisdiction and delays in the submission and approval of one Annual Capital Plan in a separate jurisdiction.
17. Audit completed or planned: An Assurance Engagement Internal Audit is planned for 2011-2012.
18. Evaluation completed or planned: A joint Strategic Evaluation of the Provincial-Territorial Base Fund and the Gas Tax Fund is planned, and the expected completion date is 2012-2013.
Building Canada Fund-Communities Component
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Building Canada Fund-Communities Component
2. Start Date: 2008-2009
3. End Date: 2016-2017
4. Description: To invest in provincial and community infrastructure to address both national, provincial-territorial and community priorities.
5. Strategic Outcome: Funding for quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians in a competitive economy, a cleaner environment and liveable communities is provided.
6. Results Achieved: In 2009-2010, the Government of Canada announced funding for 382 infrastructure projects under the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component, with a total federal commitment of $524.4 million. $1.1 billion has been leveraged from partners for the implementation of these projects and the total investment is $1.6 billion.
These new commitments have fully allocated the funds under the program, and brings the total number of projects to 859, which are provided with federal funding since the launch of the program. The overall federal contribution is approximately $1.01 billion, for a total investment of $3.1 billion.
In addition, eight projects have been approved under the Large Urban Centres Component (LUCC) of the Building Canada Fund. This Component of the Building Canada Fund is aimed at supporting infrastructure in Quebec’s nine biggest cities and involves a federal contribution of approximately $200 million.
13. Program Activity: Building Canada Fund-Communities Component.
| 7. Actual Spending 2007-2008 | 8. Actual Spending 2008-2009 | 9. Planned Spending 2009-2010 | 10. Total Authorities 2009-2010 | 11. Actual Spending 2009-2010 | 12. Variances | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14. Total Grants | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 14. Total Contributions | $ | $0.8 | $117.5 | $207.9 | $99.8 | $108.2 |
| 14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 15. Total Program Activity(ies) | $ | $0.8 | $117.5 | $207.9 | $99.8 | $108.2 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to contribution agreements being signed later than anticipated.
17. Audit completed or planned: An Assurance Engagement Internal Audit is planned for 2010-2011.
18. Evaluation completed or planned: A joint Strategic Evaluation of the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component and the Municipal Rural Strategic Infrastructure Fun is planned, and the expected completion date is 2011-2012.
Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component
2. Start Date: 2008-2009
3. End Date: 2016-2017
4. Description: This fund targets larger, strategic infrastructure projects of national and regional significance.
5. Strategic Outcome: Funding for quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians in a competitive economy, a cleaner environment and liveable communities is provided.
6. Results Achieved: Investments under the Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component (BCF-MIC) promote a stronger economy, a cleaner environment and stronger and safer communities. Since its launch in Budget 2007, $5.7 billion, representing approximately 84 percent of the funds available under the Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component program, has been committed to 125 major projects across the country. As of March 31, 2010, 48 major projects, worth $10.2 billion ($3.14 billion federal), have begun construction. Construction has been completed for six projects worth $35.7 million ($13.85 million federal).
In light of the commitment to accelerate funding under the Building Canada Plan, the federal funding approval process and environmental processes were accelerated and streamlined for the Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component. These measures have considerably reduced the time needed to provide federal approvals for projects funded through the Major Infrastructure Component of the Building Canada Fund. As a result of these efforts, program funding is almost completely committed in six of the ten provinces.
In 2009-2010 alone, Infrastructure Canada announced funding for 65 major infrastructure projects with a total federal commitment of approximately $1.84 billion. Funding for these projects will leverage $5.3 billion in funding from our funding partners. Furthermore, under the new streamlined process, more than $2.3 billion in federal funding was approved for 84 major projects in 2009-2010 alone. Beyond accelerating commitments and approvals for projects, the streamlining of processes allowed for funding to flow and for proponents to begin construction sooner. As a result, in 2009-2010 approximately 34 major projects worth $6.6 billion ($2.1 billion federal contribution) began construction. In this same period, six major projects worth $35.7 million ($13.85 federal contribution) completed construction.
It is worth noting that the federal government is a funding partner. Once the federal government has approved the project, the pace at which a project gets built will depend on the proponent, and is not within the federal government's control.
13. Program Activity: Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component.
| 7. Actual Spending 2007-2008 | 8. Actual Spending 2008-2009 | 9. Planned Spending 2009-2010 | 10. Total Authorities 2009-2010 | 11. Actual Spending 2009-2010 | 12. Variances | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14. Total Grants | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 14. Total Contributions | $ | $55.4 | $861.9 | $603.1 | $194.8 | $408.4 |
| 14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 15. Total Program Activity(ies) | $ | $55.4 | $861.9 | $603.1 | $194.8 | $408.4 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to contribution agreements being signed later than anticipated.
17. Audit completed or planned: An Assurance Engagement Internal Audit is planned for 2010-2011.
18. Evaluation completed or planned: A joint Strategic Evaluation of the Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component and the Green Infrastructure Fund is planned, and the expected completion date is for 2013-2014.
Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up
2. Start Date: 2008-2009
3. End Date: 2010-2011
4. Description: To invest in provincial and community infrastructure to address both national, provincial-territorial and community priorities.
5. Strategic Outcome: Construction-ready infrastructure projects are provided with federal funding support.
6. Results Achieved: In 2009-2010, Infrastructure Canada amended the Communities Component Agreements with all provinces in order to set the top-up funding allocations and reflect the new requirements of the program. During this fiscal year, funding was announced for 529 projects with a federal contribution of $486.3 million. An additional $1.03 billion has been leveraged from funding partners, and total costs are $1.5 billion.
13. Program Activity: Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up.
| 7. Actual Spending 2007-2008 | 8. Actual Spending 2008-2009 | 9. Planned Spending 2009-2010 | 10. Total Authorities 2009-2010 | 11. Actual Spending 2009-2010 | 12. Variances | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14. Total Grants | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 14. Total Contributions | $ | $ | $250.0 | $30.0 | $30.0 | $0 |
| 14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 15. Total Program Activity(ies) | $ | $ | $250.0 | $30.0 | $30.0 | $0 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s):
17. Audit completed or planned: An Assurance Engagement Internal Audit of the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component is planned for 2010-2011.
18. Evaluation completed or planned: A Cluster Evaluation that includes the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund, the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up, and the Fund for National Trails Coalition is ongoing, and the expected completion date is August 2011.
Research, Knowledge and Outreach Program
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Research, Knowledge and Outreach Program
2. Start Date: 2004-2005
3. End Date: 2009-2010
4. Description: The Researh Knowledge and Outreach program supports strategic research capacity and knowledge generation and applications at the national level, as well as cooperation with other orders of government in addressing their unique research and capacity-building needs. It levers research resources and expertise across various orders of government and stakeholder groups to address the infrastructure challenges and proposed solutions for Canada’s economy, environment and communities.
5. Strategic Outcome: Funding for quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians in a competitive economy, a clean environment and liveable communities is provided.
6. Results Achieved: In 2009-2010, Infrastructure Canada continued to deliver high quality and timely policy support and advice to develop strategic policies based on sound knowledge and strong partnerships. Over its five-year duration, the Research, Knowledge and Outreach program funding provided $12.5 million towards 77 externally-generated research projects. The federal contributions also leveraged an additional 80% from other funders.
13. Program Activity: Economic Analysis and Research.
| 7. Actual Spending 2007-2008 | 8. Actual Spending 2008-2009 | 9. Planned Spending 2009-2010 | 10. Total Authorities 2009-2010 | 11. Actual Spending 2009-2010 | 12. Variances | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14. Total Grants | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 14. Total Contributions | $3.2 | $1.7 | $2.1 | $1.1 | $1.1 | $0 |
| 14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 15. Total Program Activity(ies) | $3.2 | $1.7 | $2.1 | $1.1 | $1.1 | $0 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s):
17. Audit completed or planned: There are currently no audits planned for the 2010 to 2013 period.
18. Evaluation completed or planned: To be determined.
Green Infrastructure Fund
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Green Infrastructure Fund
2. Start Date: 2009-2010
3. End Date: 2013-2014
4. Description: Directed to projects of major federal or regional significance that promote cleaner air, reduced greenhouse gas emissions and cleaner water.
5. Strategic Outcome: Funding for quality, cost-effective public infrastructure that meets the needs of Canadians in a competitive economy, a cleaner environment and liveable communities is provided.
6. Results Achieved: The Green Infrastructure Fund provides targeted investments in green infrastructure that can improve the quality of the environment and lead to a more sustainable economy over the longer term. This fund focuses on green priorities such as green energy generation and transmission infrastructure, building and upgrading wastewater treatment systems and improving solid waste management.
The program was officially launched on May 29, 2009 with the announcement of funding for the Mayo Hydro facility along with Phase 2 of the Carmacks-Stewart transmission line, approximately 17 weeks after the announcement of the program under Budget 2009. Since the launch of the program, $627 million has been committed to 18 projects. In sum, these federal commitments have leveraged $1.5 billion from our funding partners.
In 2009-2010, seven projects valued at $980 million received approval under the Green Infrastructure Fund for $301 million in federal funding. Although construction for these projects has not yet begun, it is worth noting that the federal government is a funding partner. It does not manage the construction of infrastructure projects. As with all other infrastructure programs, federal funding for approved projects flows as construction proceeds and costs are incurred. Once the federal government has approved the project, the pace at which a project gets built and funds flow will depend on receipts submitted for completed work by the proponent, and is not within the federal government's control.
13. Program Activity: Green Infrastructure Fund.
| 7. Actual Spending 2007-2008 | 8. Actual Spending 2008-2009 | 9. Planned Spending 2009-2010 | 10. Total Authorities 2009-2010 | 11. Actual Spending 2009-2010 | 12. Variances | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14. Total Grants | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 14. Total Contributions | $ | $ | $200.0 | $5.2 | $5.2 | $0 |
| 14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 15. Total Program Activity(ies) | $ | $ | $200.0 | $5.2 | $5.2 | $0 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s):
17. Audit completed or planned: An Assurance Engagement of the Green Infrastructure Fund Internal Audit is planned for 2012-2013.
18. Evaluation completed or planned: A joint Strategic Evaluation of the Green Infrastructure Fund and the Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component is planned, and the expected completion date is for 2013-2014.
Infrastructure Stimulus Fund
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Infrastructure Stimulus Fund
2. Start Date: 2008-2008
3. End Date: 2010-2011
4. Description: Budget 2009 established a new $4 billion Infrastructure Stimulus Fund to provide funding to provincial, territorial and municipal infrastructure rehabilitation projects. Funding was made available for two years for projects that began construction during the 2009 and 2010 construction seasons.
5. Strategic Outcome: Construction-ready infrastructure projects are provided with federal funding support.
6. Results Achieved: During 2009-2010, Infrastructure Canada signed contribution agreements with the 13 jurisdictions. It has also fully committed the federal funding of $4 billion under the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund to almost 4,000 projects. With an additional $6 billion leveraged from funding partners, these projects will provide a substantial stimulus to the economy, with an injection of $10 billion.
13. Program Activity: Infrastructure Stimulus Fund.
| 7. Actual Spending 2007-2008 | 8. Actual Spending 2008-2009 | 9. Planned Spending 2009-2010 | 10. Total Authorities 2009-2010 | 11. Actual Spending 2009-2010 | 12. Variances | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14. Total Grants | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 14. Total Contributions | $ | $ | $2,000.0 | $496.7 | $490.7 | $6.0 |
| 14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 15. Total Program Activity(ies) | $ | $ | $2,000.0 | $496.7 | $490.7 | $6.0 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance is due to decreased cash-flow requirements for existing contribution agreements.
17. Audit completed or planned: An Assurance Engagement of the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund (ISF) Internal Audit is planned for 2010-2011.
18. Evaluation completed or planned: A Cluster Evaluation that includes the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund, the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up, and the Fund for National Trails Coalition is ongoing, and the expected completion date is August 2011.
Support for the G8 Summit (2010)
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: Support for the G8 Summit (2010)
2. Start Date: 2009-2010
3. End Date: 2010-2011
4. Description: Announced in Budget 2009, this program provided up to $50 million in funding for infrastructure projects that supported the hosting of the G8 Summit in June 2010 in Huntsville, Ontario, and provided a legacy to local communities and the region as a result of hosting the Summit. The maximum share of federal funding is up to one hundred percent (100%) of total eligible costs. The funds have enhanced local infrastructure and enabled the region to showcase itself to visitors and media during the Summit.
5. Strategic Outcome: Construction-ready infrastructure projects are provided with federal funding support.
6. Results Achieved: The G8 Summit initiative enhanced local infrastructure and enabled the region to showcase its positive attributes to the participants and media who attended the Summit. The funding was provided as a legacy to the region, not only in order to help the region to prepare for the event but also as form of compensation for the inconveniences faced by host residents during such high-profile events. G8 funding investments were used for an airport, media centre, and to rehabilitate roads and sidewalks, to improve signage and lighting, to update streetscape furniture, and for improvements to public parks and beautification projects
13. Program Activity: Support for the G8 Summit (2010).
| 7. Actual Spending 2007-2008 | 8. Actual Spending 2008-2009 | 9. Planned Spending 2009-2010 | 10. Total Authorities 2009-2010 | 11. Actual Spending 2009-2010 | 12. Variances | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14. Total Grants | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 14. Total Contributions | $ | $ | $ | $50.0 | $40.6 | $9.4 |
| 14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 15. Total Program Activity(ies) | $ | $ | $ | $50.0 | $40.6 | $9.4 |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s): The program was extended to 2010-2011 to finalize spending.
17. Audit completed or planned: A Review of the G8 Legacy Fund is in progress, and is expected to be completed in 2010.
18. Evaluation completed or planned: The G8 program is a two-year specifically targeted program, and as such, an evaluation is not required.
National Trails Coalition Fund
1. Name of Transfer Payment Program: National Trails Coalition Fund
2. Start Date: 2009-2010
3. End Date: 2009-2010
4. Description: This program provides funding for public infrastructure projects that promote cleaner air, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, and cleaner land and water.
5. Strategic Outcome: Construction-ready infrastructure projects are provided with federal funding support.
6. Results Achieved: In 2009-2010, Infrastructure Canada fully committed the $25 million under the National Coalition Trails Fund to 480 projects. $36 million was leveraged from funding partners, for overall investments totaling $60 million.
As of March 31, 2010, all projects were completed. Over $21 million of federal funding had flowed to the recipient. The remaining balance of the federal contribution will be provided when the final audit report is received.
During the fiscal year, ultimate recipients under the National Trails Coalition Fund built over 2,000 kilometers of all-terrain vehicles, snowmobile or non-motorized rails, while upgrading 14,000 kilometers and rehabilitating 4,000 kilometers. These works have translated in substantial economic activity and job creation all over the country.
13. Program Activity: National Trails Coalition.
| 7. Actual Spending 2007-2008 | 8. Actual Spending 2008-2009 | 9. Planned Spending 2009-2010 | 10. Total Authorities 2009-2010 | 11. Actual Spending 2009-2010 | 12. Variances | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14. Total Grants | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 14. Total Contributions | $ | $ | $ | $25.0 | $25.0 | $ |
| 14. Total Other Types of Transfer Payments | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| 15. Total Program Activity(ies) | $ | $ | $ | $25.0 | $25.0 | $ |
16. Comment(s) on Variance(s):
17. Audit completed or planned: An Assurance Audit of the National Trails Coalition is in progress, and is expected to be completed in 2010. The National Trails Coalition will submit a compliance and financial audit report in 2010-2011.
18. Evaluation completed or planned: A cluster evaluation that includes the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund, the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up, and the Fund for National Trails Coalition Fund is ongoing, and the expected completion date is August 2011.
Horizontal Initiatives
- Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF)
- Border Infrastructure Fund (BIF)
- Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF)
- Infrastructure Canada Program (ICP)
- Building Canada Fund (BCF)
Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund
1. Name of Horizontal Initiative: Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund
2. Name of Lead Department(s): Infrastructure Canada
3. Lead Department Program Activity: Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund
4. Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative: 2003-2004
5. End Date of the Horizontal Initiative: 2012-2013
6. Total Federal Funding Allocation (Start to End Date): $4.9 Billion
7. Description of the Horizontal Initiative (Including Funding Agreement):
The Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund, which received funding in the 2001 and 2003 federal budgets, is a cost-shared contribution program for strategic infrastructure projects. To date, funding has been approved to support 75 projects.
Investments are directed to projects of major national and regional significance, and are to be made in areas that are vital to sustaining economic growth and supporting an enhanced quality of life for Canadians. The fund is delivered through negotiated agreements with provincial, territorial or local governments, private partners or non-governmental organizations. Contribution agreements are tailored based on the project requirements.
The Canada Strategic Infrastructure Act outlines the prime categories of investments in projects that involve fixed capital assets that are used or operated for the benefit of the public. The categories eligible under the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund are:
- Highway and Rail Infrastructure;
- Local Transportation Infrastructure;
- Tourism or Urban Development Infrastructure;
- Water or Sewage Infrastructure; and
- Other categories approved by regulation, e.g. Advanced Telecommunications and High-Speed Broadband, Northern Infrastructure.
More information on the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund can be found at: http://www.infc.gc.ca/ip-pi/csif-fcis/csif-fcis-eng.html.
8. Shared Outcome(s):
The overall planned results Infrastructure Canada expects to achieve through the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund are to invest in projects which:
- facilitate the movement of goods and people on Canada’s National Highway System for the purposes of increasing the productivity, economic efficiency, and safety of Canada’s surface transportation system;
- facilitate the safe and efficient movement of goods and people, ease congestion, or reduce greenhouse gases and airborne pollutants;
- ensure that tourism continues to contribute to the economic well-being of Canadians and to serve as a bridge between Canada and the world;
- ensure that drinking water is safe, clean, and reliable at drinking water facilities, and ensure sustainable treatment of wastewater; and expand broadband networks in Canada.
9. Governance Structure(s):
All Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund projects are selected under the authority of the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities. Prior to selecting projects, the Minister consults other Ministers who have an interest in the region or in the substantive project area. After project selection, Treasury Board approval is sought for each contribution. At the same time, incremental operating funds required for project oversight and management by the implementing departments/agencies are identified and sought in the Treasury Board submission.
The fund is delivered in partnership involving primarily three sets of key collaborators:
- Infrastructure Canada: As the coordinating and funding agent for the contribution, Infrastructure Canada is responsible for project review, selection, approval, public announcements, environmental assessment in some cases, and program evaluation. It leads the negotiation of contribution agreements with each of the funding recipients. It also develops, in coordination with the implementing
department/agency, the submission to Treasury Board for the approval of funds. To monitor activities and milestones throughout the project life cycle, an Infrastructure Canada representative will sit on the project’s Agreement Steering Committee usually as the federal co-chair, except for transportation projects where Transport Canada is the lead.
- An implementing department/agency: Infrastructure Canada’s relationship with each implementing department or agency varies with their capacity and the complexity of the project. Responsibilities are also negotiated specifically for each project. The implementing department/agency may provide technical assistance in the analysis of the business case, determining the costs and
benefits to be realized, and providing advice on the development of the contribution agreement and Treasury Board submission. The implementing department/agency will support implementation of the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund projects in a manner that upholds federal due diligence in such areas as: overseeing the implementation of mitigation measures identified in the environmental
assessment, assessing the eligibility and reasonability of project costs, providing information pertaining to cash flow and budget, approving claims, making payments, and conducting audits and evaluation of projects. The implementing department/agency would normally be represented on the project’s Agreement Steering Committee. The implementing department/agency will also ensure
adherence to information management requirements, including the use of the Shared Information Management System for Infrastructure, which captures, monitors and reports on project information. The implementing department/agency also provides communication support.
- The funding recipient: The recipient may be provincial, territorial, or local government, a private partner, a non-government organization or a combination thereof. Once the project has been selected, Infrastructure Canada leads the negotiations to develop a contribution agreement. The funding recipient is responsible for ensuring that the project is completed as per the terms and conditions of the contribution agreement.
| 10. Federal Partners | 11. Federal Partner Program Activity (PA) | 12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 13. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 14. Planned Spending for 2009-2010 | 15. Actual Spending for 2009-2010 | 16. Expected Results for 2009-2010 | 17. Results Achieved in 2009-2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) | PA1 | a. | $152.8 Million | $9.3 Million | $11.4 Million |
Corner Brook Water Treatment System Improvement Project (Newfoundland): The project will consist of the design and construction of a new, centralized water treatment plant, water storage reservoir, transmission mains and pumping facility for the city of Corner Brook and surrounding communities of Massey Drive and Mount Moriah. Saint John Harbour Clean Up (New Brunswick): The project will consist of the construction of a new wastewater treatment facility and the installation of a number of pumping stations and sewer collectors in the city of Saint John. The project will eliminate the outfall of raw sewage from a number of locations into the Saint John Harbour. Stratford Water & Wastewater System Expansion: The project will consist of the expansion and upgrade of the municipal water and sewer systems and sewage treatment facilities. |
Infrastructure Canada and the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) have continued to jointly oversee and administer the contribution agreements for the implementation of projects under the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF) program. In 2009-2010, two projects began their construction phases: The Corner Brook Water Treatment System Improvement in Newfoundland with a total federal contribution of $12 million (total project costs of $43.4 million), and the Saint John Harbour Clean-Up in New Brunswick with a total federal contribution of $26.6 million (total project costs of $79.8 million). Also during the same period, Infrastructure Canada, with its partner ACOA, completed the Stratford Water and Wastewater System Expansion Project in Prince Edward Island, which represents a total federal contribution of $3.6 million and total project cost of $10.8 million. The completion of this project contributed towards meeting various strategic outcomes by ensuring that drinking water is safe, clean and reliable at drinking water facilities and ensuring sustainable treatment of wastewater. |
| 2. Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions (CEDQR) | PA1 | a. | $144.5 Million | $43.1 Million | $9.7 Million |
The Rivière Saint Charles Wastewater Project in Québec City will aid in the protection of the river environment by minimizing the quantity of contaminated wastewater that overflows into it, and re-establishing the natural habitat of the riverbanks, making them more suitable for recreational purposes. The Station Mont Tremblant Project will consist of the development of publicly accessible infrastructure for two new villages, Versant Soleil and Versant Nord. It will include other related components, such as a multi-purpose centre, inter-village transportation and multi-use trails. Atwater/Des Ballets Water Project: The Atwater (Borough of Verdun) and Charles-J. Des Baillets (Borough of LaSalle) water treatment plant facilities will be repaired and modernized to ensure the reliability and safety of the drinking water supply. The project will serve to upgrade and/or replace equipment, as certain equipment have exceeded its useful life. Improvements in the quality of existing filtration, disinfection and ozonation processes will take place. |
During 2009-2010, Infrastructure Canada and the Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions (CEDQR) continued to jointly oversee and administer the contribution agreements for the implementation of projects under the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF) program in Quebec. The following projects have continued to progress in 2009-2010:
|
| 3. Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario (Federal Delivery Ontario) | PA1 | a. | $398.0 Million | $34.6 Million | $40.9 Million |
The Toronto International Film Festival Project will include construction of a five-storey podium building to act as the headquarters (Festival Centre) for the Toronto International Film Festival. The Evergreen Brickworks Project will re-develop the former Don Valley Brick Works site in Toronto, Ontario and its 15 heritage buildings into a multi-use, multi-component building complex that will serve as an environmental education and community-focused centre. The Niagara Convention and Civic Centre (NCCC) Project will involve the construction of a convention centre in the City of Niagara Falls, Ontario with 100,000 square feet of exhibition space and 30,000 square feet of meeting space. The Niagara Convention and Civic Centre will occupy a 25 acre parcel of land in the Fallsview District of the city, approximately 500 metres from the Horseshoe Falls. The Ontario Wastewater Treatment Bundle-Sarnia and Brockville Project will consist of two different projects. The Brockville Project will bring its Water Pollution Control Centre to secondary level of treatment, reducing concentrations of ammonia, chlorine and other pollutants, and accommodating waste from private septic systems. The project is designed to account for expected population growth during the next 25 years. In Sarnia, the City will upgrade its sewer system, including the installation of a main sewer and related infrastructure, and the separation of existing combined sewers. The Hamilton Harbour Clean-Up Project is designed to enhance the quality of life for the residents of the City of Hamilton and to contribute to the protection and improvement of public health and the environment. The positive results of this work will help in removing Hamilton Harbour from the Area of Concern List, under the Canada-U.S. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. The Kingston (Ravensview) Water Pollution Control Project will result in the reduction of effluent biochemical oxygen demand and total solids, improvements in nutrient removal in discharge of non-toxic effluent and improvements in energy efficiency by upgrading or replacing aging equipment. The Thunder Bay Water and Wastewater Treatment Project will include upgrading the Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP) from primary level, to secondary level treatment. It will also remove ammonia and chlorine from effluent, reducing surface water and infiltration water affecting the Water Pollution Control Plant’s performance. It will reduce discharge of untreated sewage to water courses and risk of basement flooding, and transfer backwash water from the Bare Point Water Treatment, to the city’s sanitary system for treatment at the Water Pollution Control Plant. |
Infrastructure Canada and the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario have continued to jointly oversee and administer the contribution agreements for the implementation of projects under the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund program. During 2009-2010, two projects have continued making progress: The Toronto International Film Festival Project with a total federal contribution of $25 million and total project cost of $114.5 million; and the Evergreen Brickworks Project with a total federal contribution of $20 million and total project cost of $55 million. During the same period, the following projects started construction: The Niagara Convention and Civic Centre project with a total federal allocation of $35 million and total project cost of $79.2 million; the Ontario Wastewater Bundle: Sarnia/Brockville project with a total federal contribution of $40.5 million and total project cost of $81 million and the Hamilton Harbour Clean-Up Project with a total federal contribution of $35 million and total project cost of $91.6 million. Finally, two projects were completed in 2009-2010: Kingston (Ravensview) Water Pollution Control Project and Thunder Bay: Water and Wastewater Treatment Project. Each project received $25 million in total federal contribution, and represented project total cost of $80 million (Kingston) and $91 million (Thunder Bay). |
| 4. Canadian Northern Development Agency (CanNor) | PA1 | a. | $41.0 Million | $12.6 Million | $0.9 Million |
The Yukon Community Waterfront Project will cover a series of urban development initiatives aimed at upgrading the function and appearance of the waterfronts in Whitehorse and Carcross and enabling further development. Work will include water, sewer, street improvements and extensions, landscaping, construction of the wharf, restoration of heritage buildings and other aesthetic improvements. The funding will also be used to support arts and culture facilities, dock improvements, trolley extension and other projects. |
During 2009-2010, Infrastructure Canada and the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency (CanNor) have continued to jointly oversee and administer the contribution agreement for the implementation of development initiatives under the Yukon Community Waterfront Project. This project was to receive initially a total federal contribution of $11 million, but an amendment to the contribution agreement was signed on March 31, 2010. This amendment increased the federal funding in the amount of $9 million for the construction of the Kwanlin Dun First Nation Cultural Centre and the Carcross Waterfront Development Phase II. The total project cost for the Yukon Community Waterfront project is over $50.4 million. |
| 5. Western Economic Diversification (WED) | PA1 | a. | $655.5.0 Million | $69.16 Million | $43.7 Million |
The Winnipeg Red River Floodway Expansion Project, to be completed in three phases, will enhance components of the existing floodway to increase flood protection for the City of Winnipeg from a 1-in-90 year level of protection, to a 1-in-700 year level of protection. It will include increasing the capacity of the floodway channel from 1,700 cubic metres of water per second to 4,000 cubic metres per second, replacing and upgrading bridge crossings, re-trenching and re-configuring utility crossings (water and electrical), upgrading and re-furbishing the Inlet Control and Outlet Structures, and the expansion of the West Dyke. The Saskatchewan Regional Rural Water Supply Bundle Project will provide funding towards the development or upgrade of new water treatment and regional distribution facilities for about 20 communities in the regions of Water West, Saskatchewan Landing, Caronport and La Ronge. The Saskatoon South Downtown Re-Development Project. The Vancouver Convention and Exhibition Centre. |
Infrastructure Canada and Western Economic Diversification have continued to jointly oversee and administer the contribution agreements for the implementation of projects under the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF) program. During 2009-2010, two projects have continued making progress: The Winnipeg Red River Floodway Expansion-West Dyke Project, with a total federal allocation of $332.5 million for all its phases (which represents total project cost of $665 million) and the Saskatchewan Regional Rural Water Supply Bundle Project, with a total federal allocation of $27.3 million and total project cost of $63 million. During the same period, the following projects were completed:
|
| 6. Transport Canada | PA1 | a. | $3,340.5 Million | $332.6 Million | $308.8 Million | ||
| Total: | $4,732.3 Million | $501.3 Million | $415.4 Million | ||||
18. Comments on Variances: None.
19. Results Achieved by Non-Federal Partners (if applicable): n/a.
20. Contact information: Claude Blanchette, Director General, Program Integration, Tel: (613) 948-9392, E-Mail: claude.blanchette@infc.gc.ca.
Border Infrastructure Fund
1. Name of Horizontal Initiative: Border Infrastructure Fund
2. Name of Lead Department(s): Infrastructure Canada
3. Lead Department Program Activity: Border Infrastructure Fund
4. Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative: 2003-2004
5. End Date of the Horizontal Initiative: 2013-2014
6. Total Federal Funding Allocation (Start to End Date): $675 Million
7. Description of the Horizontal Initiative (Including Funding Agreement):
The Border Infrastructure Fund, which was announced in Budget 2001, is a $675 million cost-shared contribution program. It complements some of the Government of Canada’s other infrastructure programs such as the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund and the Strategic Highway Infrastructure Program, a Transport Canada program.
As part of “Canada’s commitment to address land border pressures, such as traffic congestion, and to continue to facilitate the large volume of trade across the Canada – United States border”, the Border Infrastructure Fund contributions are directed at or on routes leading to Canada’s border crossings, with a particular focus on the six largest:
- Windsor, Ontario;
- Sarnia, Ontario;
- Fort Erie, Ontario;
- Niagara Falls, Ontario;
- Douglas, British Columbia; and,
- Lacolle, Quebec.
The fund also directs some funding toward smaller and regionally important border crossings throughout Canada. Once completed, projects supported under the Border Infrastructure Fund will help alleviate traffic congestion, increase system capacity and further the Smart Border Declaration (a Canada – US Declaration; see http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/anti-terrorism/declaration-en.asp).
More information on this fund can be found at: http://www.infc.gc.ca/ip-pi/bif-fsif/bif-fsif-eng.html.
8. Shared Outcome(s):
The overall planned results that Infrastructure Canada expects to achieve through the Border Infrastructure Fund are to invest in projects that contribute to safe and efficient border crossings. Expected outcomes are to alleviate border congestion and increase border crossing capacity, and to increase security and safety at border crossings, leading to cross border trade efficiencies.
9. Governance Structure(s):
All Border Infrastructure Fund projects are selected under the authority of the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities. Prior to selecting projects, the Minister consults with other Ministers who have an interest in the region or in the substantive project area. After project selection, public announcements are made by the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities. Treasury Board approval is sought for each contribution. At the same time, incremental operating funds required for project oversight and management by Transport Canada are identified and sought in the Treasury Board submission.
The fund is delivered in partnership involving primarily three sets of key collaborators:
- Infrastructure Canada: As the coordinating and funding agent for the contribution, Infrastructure Canada is responsible for project review and selection. It leads the negotiation of contribution agreements with each of the funding recipients and is responsible for the evaluation of the program. To monitor activities and milestones throughout the project life cycle, an Infrastructure
Canada representative will sit on the project’s Agreement Steering Committee.
- Transport Canada: This department has the project-specific technical knowledge with regard to each project. Transport Canada provides analysis and advice for the review and approval of projects. It is responsible for implementing the Border Infrastructure Fund projects in a manner that upholds federal due diligence in such areas as: environmental assessment, the eligibility and
reasonability of project costs, the provision of information pertaining to cash flow and budget, the approval of invoices, making payments, the conducting of audits and evaluation of the projects. Transport Canada reviews the business case for the project, and determines the costs and benefits. It works with Infrastructure Canada to jointly negotiate the project agreement and prepares the
Treasury Board submission; the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities signs both documents. Transport Canada is the federal co-chair of the project’s Agreement Steering Committee. It also ensures adherence to information management requirements to capture, monitor and report on project information.
- The funding recipient: The recipient may be a provincial, territorial or local government, private partner or a combination thereof. Once the project has been selected, the funding recipient enters into negotiations with Infrastructure Canada to develop a contribution agreement. The funding recipient is responsible for ensuring that the project is completed as per the terms and conditions of the contribution agreement.
| 10. Federal Partners | 11. Federal Partner Program Activity (PA) | 12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 13. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 14. Planned Spending for 2009-2010 | 15. Actual Spending for 2009-2010 | 16. Expected Results for 2009-2010 | 17. Results Achieved in 2009-2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Transport Canada) | PA1 | a. | $542 Million | $66.7 Million | $80.8 Million |
The Windsor/ VACIS project is a joint project with the Canadian Pacific Railway and secures the 7.5 km CPR rail corridor from Walker Road in Windsor to the United States’ border by protecting that length of track and preparing the site for the installation of a Vehicle and Cargo Inspection System by the United States Government. |
Infrastructure Canada and Transport Canada have continued to oversee and manage projects under the Border Infrastructure Fund (BIF) program across Canada. |
| Total: | $542 Million | $66.73 Million | $80.8 Million | ||||
18. Comments on Variances: None.
19. Results Achieved by Non-Federal Partners (if applicable): n/a.
20. Contact information: Claude Blanchette, Director General, Program Integration, Tel: (613) 948-9392, E-Mail: claude.blanchette@infc.gc.ca.
Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund
1. Name of Horizontal Initiative: Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund
2. Name of Lead Department(s): Infrastructure Canada
3. Lead Department Program Activity: Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund
4. Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative: 2004-2005
5. End Date of the Horizontal Initiative: 2013-2014
6. Total Federal Funding Allocation (Start to End Date): $1.1 Billion
7. Description of the Horizontal Initiative (Including Funding Agreement):
The $1.1 billion Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund has been structured to provide a balanced response to local infrastructure needs in urban and rural Canada and will ensure that all Canadians, whether they live in large, small or remote communities will share in the benefits of infrastructure investments.
The fund improves and increases the stock of core public infrastructure in areas such as water, wastewater, culture, recreation, and those very things that make our communities vibrant and productive places to live, work and raise families. It targets communities of less than 250,000 residents as well as First Nation communities. Like other infrastructure programs, the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund seeks to ensure that the projects it funds support the goals of the Government of Canada, encourages new and innovative approaches and favours partnerships, including an emphasis on ‘green’ projects which are sustainable and reduce greenhouse gases.
Through the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund, the Government of Canada continues to work in productive partnerships with provinces, territories, and municipalities, as well as First Nations and the private sector, to invest in local infrastructure projects. These projects will be vital to sustaining economic growth and supporting an enhanced quality of life in Canadian communities.
The fund is cost-shared, with the Government of Canada contributing, on average, one-third of total project eligible costs. Provinces and municipalities contribute the remainder of these costs. In recognition of the unique circumstances of the First Nations and the Territories, where many communities have no tax base, the Government of Canada may contribute a higher percentage of total project
eligible costs.
More information on the fund can be found at: http://www.infc.gc.ca/ip-pi/mrif-fimr/mrif-fimr-eng.html.
8. Shared Outcome(s):
The overall expected outcomes are:
- Improved and increased core public infrastructure in areas such as water, wastewater, culture and recreation; and
- Improved quality of life and economic opportunities for smaller communities and First Nations.
9. Governance Structure(s):
The Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund is based on a federal partnership arrangement between Infrastructure Canada and five federal departments: Western Economic Diversification, Industry Canada (for Ontario projects), Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions, the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency, and Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. It involves 14 sub-programs, one joint sub-program for each province and territory and a sub-program for First Nations communities. Each of the 14 sub-programs follows the same general conditions, priorities and approaches. Also, recognizing the individual nature of each sub-program, the various agreements reflect the nature of the partnership as it relates to the order of government.
To achieve expected outcomes, the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund eligible projects must conform to a policy leveraging framework, based on a common baseline, but adapted for each jurisdiction. To ensure broad support and effective, innovative project delivery, partnerships of various types, including public-private partnerships are encouraged in the formulation and delivery of the fund projects. The program relies on strong input from local and rural municipalities, including the support of the locally elected councils. In addition, municipal representatives are involved in the processes and management of the program in the respective province or territory.
| 10. Federal Partners | 11. Federal Partner Program Activity (PA) | 12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 13. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 14. Planned Spending for 2009-2010 | 15. Actual Spending for 2009-2010 | 16. Expected Results for 2009-2010 | 17. Results Achieved in 2009-2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA)) | PA1 | a. | $143.4 Million | $37.5 Million | $26.6 Million |
Infrastructure Canada and the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) will continue to jointly oversee and administer the contribution agreements for the implementation of projects under the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF) program. |
Since the implementation of projects under the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund program in Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, the status of projects in these provinces are:
|
| 2. Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions (CEDQR) | PA1 | a. | $241.8 Million | $166.3 Million | $47.0 Million |
Infrastructure Canada and Canada Economic Development Quebec Regions will continue to jointly oversee and administer the contribution agreements for the implementation of projects under the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF) program in Quebec. |
Infrastructure Canada and Canada Economic Development Quebec Regions (CEDQR) have continued to jointly oversee and administer the contribution agreements for the implementation of projects under the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF) program in Quebec. |
| 3. Western Economic | PA1 | a. | $286.3 Million | $151.3 Million | $81.9 Million |
Infrastructure Canada and Western Economic Diversification will continue to jointly oversee and administer the contribution agreements for the implementation of projects under the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF) program. |
Since the implementation of projects under the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund program in Saskatchewan, Alberta and British Columbia, the status of projects in these provinces are:
|
| 4. Federal Development Agency for Southern Ontario (Federal Delivery Ontario) | PA1 | a. | $373.3 Million | $99.1 Million | $54.9 Million |
Infrastructure Canada and the Federal Development Agency for Southern Ontario will continue to jointly oversee and administer the contribution agreements for the implementation of projects under the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF) program in Ontario. |
Since the implementation of projects under the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund program in Ontario, 744 projects have been approved, and 440 projects have been completed. |
| 5. Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency (CanNor) | PA1 | a. | $59.1 Million | $29.5 Million | $10.8 Million |
Infrastructure Canada and the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency (CanNor) will continue to jointly oversee and administer the contribution agreements for the implementation of projects under the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF) program. |
Since the implementation of projects under the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund program in the Yukon, Northwest Territories and Nunavut, the status of projects in these territories is:
|
| Total: | $1,103.9 Million | $483.7 Million | $221.2 Million | ||||
18. Comments on Variances: None.
19. Results Achieved by Non-Federal Partners (if applicable): n/a.
20. Contact information: Claude Blanchette, Director General, Program Integration, Tel: (613) 948-9392, E-Mail: claude.blanchette@infc.gc.ca.
Infrastructure Canada Program
1. Name of Horizontal Initiative: Infrastructure Canada Program
2. Name of Lead Department(s): Infrastructure Canada
3. Lead Department Program Activity: In the former program activity architecture (PAA) structure, this program was under the Targeted Project-Based Infrastructure Funding program activity. Since this program is scheduled to sunset in 2010-2011, it did not become a program activity on its own under the current (PAA) structure.
4. Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative: 2000-2001
5. End Date of the Horizontal Initiative: 2010-2011
6. Total Federal Funding Allocation (Start to End Date): $2.05 Billion
7. Description of the Horizontal Initiative (Including Funding Agreement):
The Infrastructure Canada Program is a contribution program introduced in 2000 for local municipal infrastructure projects. The Government of Canada matches the provincial/territorial governments’ contributions, providing up to one-third of the cost of each municipal infrastructure project. It is a $2.05 billion program in effect until 2010-2011. The fund is well underway and projects are ongoing across the country. Most of the funding has either been committed for approved projects or notionally allocated to those that are under review.
The fund’s first priority for funding is “green municipal projects”, i.e. projects with environmental benefits that enhance the quality of the environment or health benefits that enhance the quality of human life. Other priorities include affordable housing, culture, tourism and recreation, rural and remote telecommunication, high-speed access for local public institutions and local transportation. Recognizing that individual communities know their needs best, the program operates in a "bottom-up" fashion, with the flexibility for municipalities and First Nations to identify their own infrastructure priorities. It also includes provisions to ensure an equitable balance of funding between urban and rural communities.
Further information may be obtained at http://www.infc.gc.ca/ip-pi/icp-pic/icp-pic-eng.html.
8. Shared Outcome(s):
The overall planned results are that urban and rural municipal infrastructure in Canada is enhanced and Canadians’ quality of life is improved through investments that protect the environment and support long-term community and economic growth.
9. Governance Structure(s):
The key roles and responsibilities of partners are as follows:
- Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities – overall program management and accountability to Parliament, including media relations, appointment of Management Committee members, project approval for projects where the federal share is between $1M - $10M;
- Infrastructure Canada – oversight and monitoring of the program ensuring effective management and a coordinated approach to communications and provision of services including operational services, information management, and communications services;
- Ministers or Ministers of State responsible for delivery (Industry Canada; Western Economic Diversification; Canada Economic Development – Quebec; Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency; Indian and Northern Affairs Canada) – with Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities joint authority to enter into contribution agreements with provinces/territories, and project approval where federal share is less than $1M;
- Federal-Provincial/Territorial Management Committees (one per jurisdiction) – administration and management of the Infrastructure Canada Program in accordance with the terms and conditions of the applicable federal-provincial/territorial agreement;
- Provinces/Territories – signatories to the negotiated agreements with the federal government;
- Local governments – main applicants for Infrastructure Canada Program projects; also responsible for sponsoring projects with non-governmental organizations and/or private sector;
- Non-governmental organizations and private sector – eligible to propose projects that are sponsored either by a municipality, a province/territory or the federal government; and
- Other government departments - provide key expertise for all or some types of Infrastructure Canada Program projects (e.g., Transport Canada, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency).
| 10. Federal Partners | 11. Federal Partner Program Activity (PA) | 12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 13. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 14. Planned Spending for 2009-2010 | 15. Actual Spending for 2009-2010 | 16. Expected Results for 2009-2010 | 17. Results Achieved in 2009-2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) | PA1 | a. | $188.2 Million | $0.0 Million | $0.8 Million |
In Nova Scotia, the Municipality of the County of Victoria-Baddeck, the upgrades to its wastewater treatment system will treat 287 houses to a higher quality of wastewater while connecting 80 more to wastewater treatment systems. The upgrades to New Brunswick’s Village of Dorchester’s water system will allow it to provide potable water to the residences there. The Glenwood-Applewood Sewage Treatment Plant in Newfoundland and Labrador will increase the quality of potable water to 540 houses. |
This project has been completed. |
| 2. Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions (CEDQR) | PA1 | a. | $525.3 Million | $12.4 Million | $11.7 Million |
|
Since the beginning of the program, the Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions administrated more than 890 projects, which represents a total federal contribution of $503.3 million. |
|
3. Western Economic Diversification (WED) |
PA1 | a. | $568.3 Million | $6.8 Million | $2.9 Million |
|
The Western Economic Diversification managed over 1,600 projects funded under the Infrastructure Canada Program (ICP) since the inception of the program. These projects represent a total federal contribution of more than $540 million |
| 4. Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario (Federal Delivery Ontario) | PA1 | a. | $693.8 Million | $0.0 Million | $3.7 Million |
|
Since the beginning of the Infrastructure Canada Program, Industry Canada managed over 530 projects for a total federal contribution of nearly $671 million. |
| 5. Canadian Northern Development Agency (CanNor) | PA1 | a. | $40.0 Million | $0.0 Million | $0.0 Million |
|
Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) managed over 100 projects under the Infrastructure Canada Program (ICP). These projects represented a total federal contribution of more than $38 million. |
| Total: | $2,015.6 Million | $19.2 Million | $19.1 Million | ||||
18. Comments on Variances: None.
19. Results Achieved by Non-Federal Partners (if applicable): n/a.
20. Contact information: Claude Blanchette, Director General, Program Integration, Tel: (613) 948-9392, E-Mail: claude.blanchette@infc.gc.ca.
Building Canada Fund
1. Name of Horizontal Initiative: Building Canada Fund
2. Name of Lead Department(s): Infrastructure Canada
3. Lead Department Program Activities: Building Canada Fund-Communities Component, Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component and Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up
4. Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative: 2007-2008
5. End Date of the Horizontal Initiative: 2016-2017
6. Total Federal Funding Allocation (Start to End Date): $8.5 Billion1
7. Description of the Horizontal Initiative (Including Funding Agreement):
The Building Canada Fund focuses on projects that deliver economic, environmental, and social benefits to all Canadians.
The national priorities for funding are core national highway system routes, drinking water, wastewater, public transit and green energy. Other eligible categories include projects that support economic growth and development (short-line rail and short-sea shipping, connectivity and broadband, tourism and regional and local airports), environmental projects (solid waste management), as well as projects that contribute to the ongoing development of safe and strong communities (disaster mitigation, culture, sport, local roads and bridges, and brownfield re-development). Funding is used to support public infrastructure owned by provincial, territorial and municipal governments and entities, as well as the non-profit sector and private industry, in certain cases.
Funding is allocated for projects in the various provinces and territories based on their population (as of the 2006 Census). In the provinces, the program operates through two components: the Major Infrastructure Component and the Communities Component. In the territories, in recognition of their very low per capita allocations, the Building Canada funding has been rolled into the Provincial-Territorial Base Funding Program and is managed under the terms of this latter program in each territory.
The Major Infrastructure Component targets larger, strategic projects of national and regional significance. Under this component, two-thirds of national funding is directed to the above-mentioned national priorities. Projects under the Major Infrastructure Component are selected jointly on the basis of merit through a federal-provincial/territorial negotiation process, and all projects are required to meet criteria targeting environmental, economic and quality-of-life objectives. Innovative technologies and partnerships will also be emphasized.
The Communities Component is focused on projects in communities with populations of less than 100,000. Projects are selected through an application-based process and, like projects under the Major Infrastructure Component, are evaluated on the extent to which they meet environmental, economic and quality of life objectives. This will significantly help smaller communities address their infrastructure pressures and serve as a complementary instrument to the Gas Tax Fund.
More information on the Building Canada Fund can be found at: http://www.buildingcanada-chantierscanada.gc.ca/funprog-progfin/target-viser/bcf-fcc/bcf-fcc-eng.html.
8. Shared Outcome(s):
The overall expected outcomes are to deliver results that matter to Canadians—cleaner air and water, safer roads, shorter commutes, and prosperous, liveable communities while supporting the Canada's priorities—a stronger economy, cleaner environment and better communities.
9. Governance Structure(s):
i. Major Infrastructure Component of the Building Canada Fund
All Major Infrastructure Component projects are selected under the authority of the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities. Priorities are identified through discussions with provinces, territories, including through the Infrastructure Framework Committees. Prior to selecting projects, the Minister consults other Ministers who have an interest in the region or in the substantive project area. Following due diligence, Treasury Board approval is required for contributions to any projects above the delegated threshold (e.g. $50 million federal contribution). At the same time, incremental operating funds required for project oversight and management by the implementing departments/agencies are identified and sought in the Treasury Board submission.
The Major Infrastructure Component is delivered in partnership involving primarily three sets of key collaborators:
- Infrastructure Canada: As the coordinating and funding agent for the contribution, Infrastructure Canada is responsible for identifying priorities, recommending approval of all Major Infrastructure Component projects to the Minister, public announcements, environmental assessment in some cases, and program evaluation. In the case of non-transportation projects, Infrastructure Canada is also responsible for project review/due diligence, selection, and the negotiation of contribution agreements with each of the funding recipients. Infrastructure Canada develops, in coordination with the implementing department/agency, the submission to Treasury Board for the approval of funds. For transport-related projects, Transport Canada completes a project review/due diligence for Infrastructure Canada, negotiates the contribution agreements and the Treasury Board submissions. To monitor activities and milestones throughout the project life cycle, an Infrastructure Canada representative will sit on the project’s Agreement Steering Committee. Infrastructure Canada is responsible for general oversight of all projects in this program.
- An implementing department/agency: Infrastructure Canada’s relationship with each implementing department or agency varies with their capacity and the complexity of the project. Responsibilities are also negotiated specifically for each project. The implementing department/agency may provide technical assistance in the analysis of the business case, determining the costs and benefits to be realized, and providing advice on the development of the contribution agreement and Treasury Board submission. The implementing department/agency will support Infrastructure Canada in the implementation of the Major Infrastructure Componentprojects in a manner that upholds federal due diligence in such areas as: overseeing the implementation of mitigation measures identified in the environmental assessment, assessing the eligibility and reasonability of project costs, providing information pertaining to cash flow and budget, approving claims, making payments, and conducting audits and evaluations of the projects. The implementing department/agency would normally be represented on the project’s Agreement Steering Committee. The implementing department/agency will also ensure adherence to Infrastructure Canada’s information management requirements, including the use of Infrastructure Canada’s Shared Information Management System for Infrastructure, which captures, monitors and reports project information. The implementing department/agency also provides communication support to Infrastructure Canada.
- The funding recipient: The recipient may be provincial, territorial, or local government, a private partner, a non-government organization or a combination thereof. Once the project has been selected, Infrastructure Canada leads the negotiations to develop a contribution agreement, except for transportation items which are handled by Transport Canada. The funding recipient is responsible for ensuring that the project is completed as per the terms and conditions of the contribution agreement.
ii. Communities Component of the Building Canada Fund
The Communities Component is governed by separate federal-provincial contribution agreements, each of which is managed by an Oversight Committee established by the Infrastructure Framework Committee that includes both federal and provincial senior officials. To support the operation of the Communities Component and Oversight Committees, each jurisdiction has a federal-provincial Joint Secretariat staffed by Federal Delivery Partners and provincial officials.
All project applications under the Communities Component are subject to a competitive, application-based process. This process is administered by the Joint Secretariat, but a material role for the respective provincial municipal association (for those provinces that have municipal associations) may also have been established as part of the application review process. Allowing some implementation flexibility to the Joint Secretariats and Oversight Committees, all competitive processes issue calls for applications (either one open window for applications or multiple shorter windows with set closing dates). Some provinces may limit the number of applications per community within and/or across all intakes.
Joint Secretariats provide the first level of due diligence, including engineering, environmental, and legal review of the applications, and prepare briefing material for the Oversight Committees. The Oversight Committees review and rank the application against the mandatory and additional leveraging criteria established in the Policy Leveraging Framework of the Building Canada Fund. The Oversight Committee presents the recommended list of projects to the Minister or the Federal Delivery Partner Minister for consideration, in accordance with the delegations of authority. After consulting with other Ministers who have a mandate in the substantive project area, the Minister or the Federal Delivery Partner Minister provide feedback on the list of projects to the Oversight Committee. The Oversight Committee then performs a final review of the list and makes a recommendation to the appropriate Minister, in accordance with the delegations of authority. Federal funding for projects is announced once final approval has been granted in writing.
The Framework Agreements stipulate that individual federal-provincial contribution agreements govern the Communities Component in each province, and that these agreements are managed by an Oversight Committee, established under the Infrastructure Framework Committee. Each Oversight Committee includes both federal and provincial senior officials, and may also include representatives from provincial municipal associations (where applicable). The federal co-chair of the Oversight Committee is a senior official from Infrastructure Canada appointed by the Minister.
In the federal-provincial contribution agreement, the parties agreed to establish a Joint Secretariat to support the Oversight Committee and administer the Communities Component. This secretariat is staffed by officials from the provincial government and the Federal Delivery Partner.
| 10. Federal Partners | 11. Federal Partner Program Activity (PA) | 12. Names of Programs for Federal Partners | 13. Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) | 14. Planned Spending for 2009-2010 | 15. Actual Spending for 2009-2010 | 16. Expected Results for 2009-2010 | 17. Results Achieved in 2009-2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) | PA1 | a. Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component (BCF-MIC) | $12.0 Million | $5.4 Million | $12.7 Million |
Infrastructure Canada and the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) will continue to jointly develop, oversee and administer the contribution agreements for the implementation of projects under the Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component (BCF-MIC) program. |
In Prince Edward Island: Phase 2 of the wind farm development plan in Summerside was announced. The project involves a federal contribution of $4.5 million. In Nova Scotia: Six projects were announced, involving a federal contribution of approximately $54.7 million. This includes the $18.7 million contribution to support the creation of a new central library in the City of Halifax. In New Brunswick: Two projects were announced involving a federal contribution of approximately $16 million. This includes the nearly $10 million contribution to support the building of a dam and reservoir along Tower Road, at Turtle Creek. |
| b. Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF) | $26.6 Million | $9.3 Million | $6.7 Million |
St. John’s Harbour. |
Infrastructure Canada and the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) have continued to jointly oversee and administer the contribution agreements for the implementation of projects under the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF) program. |
||
| c. Building Canada Fund-Communities Component (BCF-CC) | $148.3 Million | $30.0 Million | $14.9 Million |
Infrastructure Canada and the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) will jointly oversee the implementation of the amended contribution agreements as well as the progress of all federally funded projects. |
Newfoundland: The entire $56.3 million regular Building Canada Fund-Communities Component allocation was committed. Over $100 million was leveraged from funding partners. Of 53 projects approved, three projects were completed and the remaining 51 projects are underway. In addition, the entire $7.4 million Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up allocation was committed. Of 18 projects approved, one project was completed and the remaining 17 projects are underway. Prince Edward Island: The entire $22 million regular Building Canada Fund-Communities Component allocation has now been fully committed. Over $40 million in commitments has been leveraged from funding partners. In 2009-2010 specifically, 37 regular Communities Component projects were announced with a federal commitment of over $14.4 million. Approximately $28.5 million in commitments was leveraged from funding partners. Of the 53 projects funded under regular Building Canada Fund-Communities Component allocation, in total 19 projects were completed and the remaining 36 projects are underway. The one project funded under the Building Canada Communities Component Top-Up is underway. It involves a federal contribution of $2.1 million, and has leveraged $4.2 million from funding partners. Nova Scotia: The entire $37 million regular Building Canada Fund-Communities Component allocation has now been fully committed. Over $70 million in commitments has been leveraged from funding partners. In 2009-2010 specifically, 17 regular Communities Component projects were announced with a federal contribution of over $17 million. Over $32 million in commitments was leveraged from funding partners. Of the 49 projects funded under regular Building Canada Fund-Communities Component, in total 10 projects were completed and the remaining 39 projects are underway. In addition, the entire $14 million Communities Component Top-Up allocation was fully committed. Approximately $28 million in commitments has been leveraged from funding partners. Of 38 projects under the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up, five projects are complete and the remaining 33 projects are underway. New Brunswick: The entire $33 million regular Building Canada Fund-Communities Component allocation was fully committed. Over $60 million in commitments has been leveraged from funding partners. Ten regular projects under the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component were announced in 2009-2010. Of the 42 projects funded under the Building Canada fund-Communities Component, in total one project was completed and 40 projects are underway. In addition, the entire $11.1 million Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up allocation was fully committed. Approximately $20 million in commitments was leveraged from funding partners. Of 21 projects funded under the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up, one project is completed, and 19 projects are underway. |
||
| d. Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF) | $23.2 Million | $8.5 Million | $3.4 Million |
|
Infrastructure Canada and the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) have continued to jointly oversee and administer the contribution agreements for the implementation of projects under the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF) program. |
||
| 2. Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions (CEDQR) | PA1 | a. Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component (BCF-MIC) | $40.0 Million | $11.0 Million | $14.0 Million |
Infrastructure Canada and Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions (CEDQR) will continue to jointly develop, oversee and administer the contribution agreements for the implementation of projects under the Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component (BCF-MIC). |
Ten projects were announced, involving a federal contribution of approximately $282.5 million. This includes the $46.8 million contribution to support the upgrading of drinking water treatment plants in Laval, Quebec, and the $63.8 million contribution to support upgrades to disinfection at the Jean R. Marcotte wastewater treatment facility in Montreal, Quebec. |
| b. Building Canada Fund-Communities Component (BCF-CC) | $210.0 Million | $0.0 Million | $1.7 Million |
Infrastructure Canada and Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions (CEDQR) will jointly oversee the implementation of the amended contribution agreements as well as the progress of all federally-funded projects. |
Quebec: Approximately $188 million of the $210 million regular Building Canada Fund-Communities Component allocation has been committed. Nearly $330 million in commitments has been leveraged from funding partners. 121 projects were announced in 2009-2010. Of these, 61 projects were scheduled to begin construction. In addition, the entire $112.5 million Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up allocation was fully committed. Nearly $226 million in commitments was leveraged from funding partners. All 106 approved Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up projects were scheduled to begin construction. |
||
| c. Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF) | $39.8 Million | $19.8 Million | $7.9 Million |
|
Infrastructure Canada and Canada Economic Development Quebec Regions (CEDQR) have continued to jointly oversee and administer the contribution agreements for the implementation of projects under the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF) program. |
||
|
3. Transport Canada |
PA1 | a. Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component (BCF-MIC) | $1,517.7 Million | $239.2 Million | $92.7 Million |
Infrastructure Canada and Transport Canada will continue to jointly develop, oversee and administer the contribution agreements for the implementation of projects under the Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component (BCF-MIC) program. |
29 projects, involving a federal contribution of approximately $1.1 billion, were announced for public infrastructure projects across the country. This includes the $22.5 million contribution to support the Team Gushue highway extension in Newfoundland & Labrador, the $241.9 million contribution to support the completion of the twinning of Highway 185 in Quebec, the $333 million contribution to support the construction of light rail transit along Sheppard Avenue in Toronto, Ontario, and the $41.5 million contribution to support work on interchanges of Highway 63 in Alberta. |
| b. Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF) | $100.0 Million | $32.6 Million | $37.7 Million |
New Brunswick Highways. |
Infrastructure Canada and Transport Canada have continued to jointly oversee and administer the contribution agreements for the implementation of projects under the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF) program. |
||
| 4. Western Economic Diversification (WED) | PA1 | a. Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Fund (BCF-MIC) | $100.0 Million | $47.4 Million | $44.5 Million |
Infrastructure Canada and Western Economic Diversification will continue to jointly develop, oversee and administer the contribution agreements for the implementation of projects under the Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component (BCF-MIC) program. |
Three projects were announced, involving a federal contribution of approximately $29.2 million. This includes the $18.2 million contribution supporting the construction of a new arterial roadway in Winnipeg, Manitoba. Saskatchewan: Three projects were announced, involving a federal contribution of approximately $22.5 million. This includes the $13 million contribution supporting the construction of a new art gallery in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. Alberta: Three projects were announced, involving a federal contribution of approximately $107.1 million. This includes the $75.1 million contribution supporting public transit projects in Edmonton, Alberta. British Columbia: A feasibility study, designed to help the Capital Regional District plan its wastewater treatment, was announced. It involves a federal contribution of $3.3 million. |
| b. Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF) | $170.5 Million | $47.2 Million | $27.0 Million |
Red River Floodway. |
Infrastructure Canada and Western Economic Diversification have continued to jointly oversee and administer the contribution agreements for the implementation of projects under the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF) program. |
||
| c. Building Canada Fund-Communities Component (BCF-CC) | $359.5 Million | $47.5 Million | $26.3 Million |
Infrastructure Canada and Western Economic Diversification will jointly oversee the implementation of the amended contribution agreements as well as the progress of all federally funded projects. |
Manitoba: The entire $41 million regular Building Canada Fund-Communities Component allocation was committed. Over $87 million in commitments was leveraged from funding partners. Of 30 regular Communities Component projects approved, 22 projects are underway. In addition, the entire $18.1 million Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up contribution was committed. Nearly $40 million in commitments was leveraged from funding partners. Of 22 approved Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up projects, two projects are completed and the remaining 20 projects are underway. Saskatchewan: The entire $98.6 million regular Building Canada Fund-Communities Component allocation is now fully committed. Approximately $196.6 million in commitments has been leveraged from funding partners. In 2009-2010 specifically, 53 projects were announced with a federal commitment of nearly $65 million. $134.4 million was leveraged from funding partners. Of 99 regular Communities Component projects approved, 14 projects were completed and the remaining 85 projects are underway. In addition, the entire $15.1 million Building Canada Fund-Communities Top-Up allocation was committed. Nearly $30 million in commitments was leveraged from funding partners. Of 48 approved Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up projects, three projects are completed and the remaining 45 projects are underway. Alberta: The entire $88 million regular Building Canada Fund-Communities Component allocation is now fully committed. Approximately $197 million in commitments has been leveraged from funding partners. In 2009-2010 specifically, 33 projects were announced with a federal contribution of over $60.4 million. Approximately $152.4 million in commitments was leveraged from funding partners. Of 53 regular Building Canada Fund-Communities Component projects approved, six projects were completed, and the remaining 47 projects are underway. In addition, the $52 million Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up allocation was fully committed. Of 38 approved Communities Component Top-Up projects, two projects were completed and 35 projects are underway. British Columbia: $111 million of the original $136 million regular Building Canada Fund-Communities Component allocation has now been committed, with the remaining $25 million reserved for flood mitigation. Nearly $234 million in commitments has been leveraged from funding partners. In 2009-2010 specifically, 27 projects were announced with a federal commitment of over $64 million. Over $132 million in commitments was leveraged from funding partners. Of 67 regular Building Canada Fund-Communities Component projects approved, three projects were completed and 51 projects are underway. In addition, the entire Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up allocation of $64.4 million was committed. Over $148 million in commitments was leveraged from funding partners. Of 58 approved Communities Component Top-Up projects, one project was completed and 49 projects are underway. |
||
| d. Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF) | $58.5 Million | $46.0 Million | $0.0 Million |
|
Infrastructure Canada and Western Economic Diversification have continued to jointly oversee and administer the contribution agreements for the implementation of projects under the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF) program. |
||
| 5. Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario (Federal Delivery Ontario) | PA1 | a. Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component (BCF-MIC) | $50.1 Million | $24.8 Million | $30.8 Million |
Infrastructure Canada and the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario (Federal Delivery Ontario) will continue to jointly develop, oversee and administer the contribution agreements for the implementation of projects under the Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component (BCF-MIC) program. |
Eight projects were announced, involving a federal contribution of approximately $204.3 million. This includes the $55 million contribution supporting the development of a high-speed broadband network in Eastern Ontario, and the $46.7 million contribution supporting upgrades and new construction at the Duffin Creek Water Pollution Control Plant located in the York Region, Ontario. |
| b. Building Canada Fund-Communities Component (BCF-CC) | $362.0 Million | $35.0 Million | $56.9 Million |
Infrastructure Canada and the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario (Federal Delivery Ontario) will jointly oversee the implementation of the amended contribution agreements as well as the progress of all federally funded projects. |
Ontario: The entire $362 million regular Building Canada Fund-Communities Component allocation has now been fully committed. Over $717 million in commitments has been leveraged from funding partners. In 2009-2010 specifically, two projects were announced with a federal allocation of $12.1 million. Over $24 million in commitments was leveraged from funding partners. Of 291 regular Communities Component projects approved, 48 projects were completed and 243 projects are underway. In addition, the $196 million Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up allocation was fully committed. Of 182 approved Communities Component Top-Up projects, 18 projects were completed and 153 projects are underway. |
||
| c. Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF) | $64.0 Million | $33.0 Million | $11.0 Million |
|
Infrastructure Canada and the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario have continued to jointly oversee and administer the contribution agreements for the implementation of projects under the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF) program. |
||
| d. Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF) | $0.0 Million | $0.0 Million | $25.7 Million |
|
|
||
| 6. Canadian Northern Development Agency (CanNor) | PA1 | a. Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF) | $9.5 Million | $6.3 Million | $0.2 Million |
|
Infrastructure Canada and the Canadian Northern Development Agency (CanNor) have continued to jointly oversee and administer the contribution agreements for the implementation of projects under the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF) program. |
| Total: | $3,291.7 Million | $643.0 Million | $414.1 Million | ||||
18. Comments on Variances: None.
19. Results Achieved by Non-Federal Partners (if applicable): n/a.
20. Contact information: Claude Blanchette, Director General, Program Integration, Tel: (613) 948-9392, E-Mail: claude.blanchette@infc.gc.ca.
Green Procurement
Meeting Policy Requirements
1. Has the department incorporated environmental performance considerations in its procurement decision-making processes?
Yes. Environmental performance consideration has been incorporated in the department’s procurement decision-making processes.
2. Summary of initiatives to incorporate environmental performance considerations in procurement decision-making processes:
During the reporting period of 2008-2009, Infrastructure Canada worked with Public Works and Government Services Canada’s Client Engagement Sector to analyze its spending patterns, and to identify opportunities for improved procurement practices. In 2009-2010, Infrastructure Canada’s Contracting and Procurement Unit continued to update its contracting systems to identify and track green procurement, and to capture green procurement information for the fiscal year 2010-2011. The department continues to consider green procurement objectives when purchasing commodities, and to promote the following practices:
Computers, printers and photocopiers:
- Purchasing or leasing energy-efficient equipment from companies with environmental programs that have recycled content and a recycling program;
- Using multi-function machines to reduce energy consumption;
- Using recycled toner cartridges;
- Developing a standard policy on personal, versus shared printers; and
- Ensuring default settings on the printers and photocopiers are to print double-sided, and print in black ink only.
Furniture:
- Using products that meet or exceed environmental norms established by Public Works and Government Services Canada; and
- Re-using and recycling old furniture.
Office Supplies:
- Using paper that is 30% recycled or higher;
- Ensuring business cards are printed on recycled paper and bear the Eco Logo symbol; and
- Ensuring nameplates are printed on 100% recycled paper and placed in re-usable plastic holders.
Travel and Meetings:
- Using government travel services and encouraging travelers to use sustainable methods of transportation and to select Green hotels;
- Promoting Green meetings within the department;
- Participating in the EcoPass Public-Transit Program;
- Encouraging staff to use other modes of transportation such as cycling and walking, by making showers available at the 90 Sparks Street, Ottawa office location; and
- Promoting the use of video and tele-conferencing as an alternative to travel.
Recycling:
- Implementing material recycling in all locations; and
- All defective and end-of-life telecommunications devices and accessories are sent to the vendors for recycling, where about 20% are re-used as telecommunication devices.
Contracting:
- Including standard environmental clauses and conditions in services contracts.
3. Results achieved:
Infrastructure Canada’s contracting and procurement team has received analysis reports on amounts spent, and has met with Public Works and Government Services Canada’s Client Engagement Team to investigate areas of procurement that could be “greener”. The IM/IT Division has developed a standard criteria for the use of personal printers, versus shared printers. Templates for letterheads were created electronically to allow letterhead logos to be used with standard recycled paper stock.
4. Contributions to facilitate government-wide implementation of green procurement:
Infrastructure Canada’s Contracting Manager is a member of the Green Procurement Forum, and participated in the inter-departmental “From Strategy to Practice – Focusing Our Efforts” forum on April 23, 2009, where departments shared challenges and focused on new procurement strategies that will continue to incorporate green procurement requirements into our business processes and tools. Infrastructure Canada continues to use Standing Offers and other procurement tools that have green procurement criteria imbedded in them.
Green Procurement Targets
5. Has the department established green procurement targets?
Under consideration. Proposals for initial draft targets need to be reviewed in the context of departmental procurement processes to ensure they will lead to meaningful improvement in green procurement practices.
6. Summary of green procurement targets:
N/A.
7. Results achieved:
Environmental performance considerations have been incorporated in the department’s procurement decision-making processes.
Response to Parliamentary Committees
There were no recommendations to Infrastructure Canada from Parliamentary Committees in 2009-2010.
Response to the Auditor General (including to the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development)
- Response to the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development (CESD):
- Chapter 03 – Sustainable Development Strategies Case Studies, October 2003:
- Update to Recommendation 3.42 – The Infrastructure Canada Program (ICP) is nearing completion and operates under a Federal Governance and Accountability Framework that identifies roles and responsibilities. The Infrastructure Canada Program funds are more than 99% committed.
With respect to reporting on the environmental performance of the Infrastructure Canada Program, Infrastructure Canada will identify benefits by category of project activity.
When this recommendation was submitted to the CESD, it was stated that a summative evaluation would take place in March 2011, i.e. within twelve months of the completion of the program, and that it would assess the full range of results from outputs through immediate and intermediate outcomes and ultimately, where possible, the ultimate outcomes. The summative evaluation would provide a thorough reporting on the environmental benefits and will assess the full range of results. The framework for the Infrastructure Canada Program evaluation is currently under development.
Taking into account the timeline of March 2011, the results of this summative evaluation will also be taken into consideration in the context of future programming.
-
Update to Recommendation 3.44 – Infrastructure Canada’s (INFC) current suite of programs has integrated environmental sustainability and environmental benefits into the program. Both the Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component and the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component have incorporated these elements through project outcomes.
Project selection processes administered by Infrastructure Canada ensure that the Policy Leveraging Framework is fully considered in the identification of projects that contribute to environmental sustainability. However, as we continue to move forward with new programs, namely through projects under the Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component and the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component, green projects will no longer be identified as a category. With respect to the programs announced in Budget 2009, Infrastructure Canada continues to consult with federal and provincial partners to ensure that non-cumbersome, but efficient measures are developed which support the Government of Canada’s objectives, including a cleaner environment.
The Framework Agreements signed with provinces and territories provide for the development of a framework for reporting to the public on the results of infrastructure investments made under the Building Canada Fund (BCF).
Infrastructure Canada will be able to report on specific positive contributions made to infrastructure objectives by the Building Canada Fund and the Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Base Fund which are of particular interest to the Government of Canada, namely: Economic growth, healthy and sustainable environment, and stronger and healthier communities.
The Accountability, Risk and Audit Framework (ARAF) for the Building Canada Fund currently indicates that reporting will be done. Examples of key performance issues include:
- The extent to which the Building Canada Fund’s funded projects will advance Canada’s priorities as defined in the Building Canada Fund’s Project Assessment Requirements (formerly the Policy Leveraging Framework); and
- The extent to which the Building Canada Fund’s approved projects support environmental priorities.
Examples of key indicators corresponding to the above issues include:
- Number and reach of the Building Canada Fund’s funded projects that set targets to meet the criteria defined in the Building Canada Fund’s Project Assessment Requirements, and agreed to provide a report on project outcome results;
- Number and reach of approved projects that have received environmental approvals;
- Number and reach of approved projects that will result in environmental enhancements; and
- Number of components under accepted Annual Capital Plans that are in categories that normally result in environmental enhancements.
Infrastructure Canada is continuing to work with federal delivery partners to review and establish agreed-to business processes that capture reporting of benefits for the Infrastructure Canada Program, the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund and the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund. It must be recognized, however, that these programs are distinct in need, scope, approach and implementation. Measures that are developed must reflect the needs and capacities of federal partners, and particularly the unique needs and capacities of municipalities.
Infrastructure Canada will continue to build the appropriate program reporting mechanisms into its program design. For the Building Canada Fund and the Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Base Fund, federal-provincial Framework Agreements and the ARAF that provides for appropriate reporting at the program level.
As the current suite of sunsetting programs (the Infrastructure Canada Program, the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund and the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund) reach the end of their respective life-cycles, Infrastructure Canada continues to work with its Federal Delivery Partners (FDPs) to follow up on appropriate reporting of program benefits and lessons learned. It is recognized that these programs have distinct needs, scopes and approaches to implementation, and that Infrastructure Canada works with its Federal Delivery Partners to ensure that program reporting is accurate, appropriate, up-to-date, and that it reflects these differences. The successes and challenges of implementing these programs will be reflected in program evaluations. For example, planning has already begun to prepare for the Infrastructure Canada Program summative evaluation. Lessons learned will be reviewed and considered in new program design and development.
The Gas Tax Fund (GTF) is an outcomes-based program initiated in 2005-2006, to provide municipalities with infrastructure investments in select categories that contributes to the achievement of three key environmental outcomes, namely, cleaner air, cleaner water and lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. As per the design of the program, the signatories of the Gas Tax Fund are required to submit annual expenditure reports that provide details of the investments made for a specific year. These expenditure reports include a summary of projects in each eligible Gas Tax Fund category, and makes a link to contributing to the achievement of any or a combination of the three environmental outcomes. The signatories of the Gas Tax Fund are also required to prepare an Outcomes Report in the fourth year of the agreement that will report on the cumulative investments, and their performance in achieving or contributing to the program’s outcomes. The Gas Tax Fund performance measurement framework is aligned with the departmental performance measurement framework currently under development, as per the Management, Resources and Results Structures (MRRS) policy.
To meet the Gax Tax Fund’s reporting requirements, signatories have agreed to a performance measurement framework for this program. This framework includes clearly defined outcomes and a methodolgy to measure immediate, intermediate and final outcomes indicators, in order to assess how projects have achieved or contributed to the program’s outcomes. At the time that this response was submitted to the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development (CESD), all agreements’ signatories were measuring project performance data and many had started to work on producing their Outcomes Reports which were published by September 2009. In addition, the Gas Tax Fund was the subject of a formative evaluation in 2007-2008, as well as a summative evaluation in 2008-2009. The findings of the formative evaluation indicate that the program design and implementation are conducive to the attainment of expected outcomes for the program. Moreover, the summative evaluation in its examination of results achieved has concluded that the Gas Tax Fund program is achieving its expected outcomes.
- Update to Recommendation 3.42 – The Infrastructure Canada Program (ICP) is nearing completion and operates under a Federal Governance and Accountability Framework that identifies roles and responsibilities. The Infrastructure Canada Program funds are more than 99% committed.
- Audit of Public Accounts 2008-2009
- Infrastructure Canada’s chart for Delegation of Financial Signing Authorities was updated in a timely manner after the swearing in of the new Minister according to the Policy on the Delegation of Financial Authorities. Shortly thereafter, Budget 2009 introduced a number of new significant programs falling under the responsibility of the department. As a result of these new programs, the Delegation chart was revised to reflect these new program authorities, and was renewed in May 2009.
- Infrastructure Canada concurs that a thorough review and update of the specimen signature cards is required and will be performed. The target completion date was December 31, 2009.
- Performance Audit of Canada’s Ecomomic Action Plan
- A government-wide performance audit of Canada’s Economic Action Plan is currently underway, and will be tabled in late October 2010.
- A government-wide performance audit of Canada’s Economic Action Plan is currently underway, and will be tabled in late October 2010.
- Audit (of Internal Audit) in Departments and Agencies
- An audit on Internal Audit in Departments and Agencies is currently underway, and will be tabled in the Auditor General’s April 2011 report.
- Chapter 03 – Sustainable Development Strategies Case Studies, October 2003:
External Audits (Note: These refer to other external audits conducted by the Public Service Commission of Canada or the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages)
Public Service Commission of Canada’s Audit of Infrastructure Canada
An external audit was conducted by the Public Service Commission (PSC) titled Audit of Infrastructure Canada. The audit was a human resources (HR) audit that examined the human resources (HR) staffing practices at Infrastructure Canada.
The final audit report was published in October 2009 and covered the period of January 1, 2006 to April 30, 2008. Although the audit found several issues, the report also noted that systematic corrective actions had already been implemented or were underway. The Public Service Commission requires that Infrastructure Canada reports back twice a year to the Commission, to ensure that the concerns in the audit are completely addressed. During the progress updates provided to the Departmental Audit Committee (DAC) in June 2010, three management action plans were listed as completed for this audit, while three remaining action plans were in various stages of completion. The Public Service Commission’s audit report is available at this link: http://www.psc-cfp.gc.ca/adt-vrf/rprt/2009/ic/index-eng.htm.
Internal Audits and Evaluations
| 1. Name of Internal Audit | 2. Audit Type | 3. Status | 4. Completion Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Follow-up Assurance Audit of Travel, Hospitality and Acquisition Cards. |
Finance | Completed | Approved by the Departmental Audit Committee (DAC) on January 27, 2010 |
| Assurance Audit of the Contribution Management Control Framework of the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF). | Transfer Payment Program | In progress | Expected for September 2010 |
| Assurance Audit of the National Trails Coalition Fund (NTCF). | Economic Action Plan | In progress | Second Quarter of 2010-2011 |
| Assurance Audit of the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component (BCF-CC). | Transfer Payment Program | Not started | Third Quarter of 2010-2011 |
| Assurance Audit of the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund (ISF). | Economic Action Plan | Not started | Third Quarter of 2010-2011 |
| Assurance Audit of the Building Canada Fund-Major Infrastructure Component (BCF-MIC). | Transfer Payment Program | Not started | Fourth Quarter of 2010-2011 |
| Assurance Audit of the Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Base Fund (PT-Base). | Transfer Payment Program | Not started | Second Quarter of 2011-2012 |
| Assurance Audit of the Corporate Management and Decision-Making Structure. | Management | Not started (Planned for 2011-2012) | To be determined |
| Assurance Audit of Information Management. | Information Management | Not started (Planned for 2011-2012) | To be determined |
| Assurance Audit of Human Resource Management. | Human Resources | Not started (Planned for 2011-2012) | To be determined |
| Assurance Audit of Program Policy Knowledge and Research. | Policy | Not started (Planned for 2011-2012) | To be determined |
| Assurance Audit of Security (Departmental, IT and Business Continuity). | Information Technology | Not started (Planned for 2011-2012) | To be determined |
| Assurance Audit of the Green Infrastructure Fund. | Transfer Payment Program | Not started (Planned for 2012-2013) | To be determined |
| Assurance Audit of Corporate Performance Framework-Information for Decision-Making and Performance Reporting. | Management | Not started (Planned for 2012-2013) | To be determined |
| Assurance Audit of Information Technology. | Information Technology | Not started (Planned for 2012-2013) | To be determined |
| Assurance Audit of Financial Planning and Reporting. | Finance | Not started (Planned for 2012-2013) | To be determined |
| Assurance Audit of Program Policy, and Public Communications. | Policy | Not started (Planned for 2012-2013) | To be determined |
| Assurance Audit of Managing Organizational Change. | Management | Not started (Planned for 2012-2013) | To be determined |
| 1. Name of Evaluation | 2. Program Activity | 3. Evaluation Type | 4. Status | 5. Completion Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Summative Evaluation of the Gas Tax Fund (GTF) and Public Transit Fund (PTF). National Summative Evaluation of the Gas Tax Fund and Public Transit Fund |
Gas Tax Fund | Summative | Completed | August 2009 |
|
Summative Evaluation of the Infrastructure Canada Program (ICP) First Nations. |
In the former program activity architecture (PAA) structure, this program was under the Targeted Project-Based Infrastructure Funding program activity. Since this program is scheduled to sunset in 2010-2011, it did not become a program activity on its own under the current (PAA) structure. | Summative | Completed | May 2010 |
|
Summative Evaluation of the Infrastructure Canada Program (ICP). |
In the former program activity architecture (PAA) structure, this program was under the Targeted Project-Based Infrastructure Funding program activity. Since this program is scheduled to sunset in 2010-2011, it did not become a program activity on its own under the current (PAA) structure. | Summative | Ongoing | September 2010 |
|
Cluster Evaluation that includes the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund (ISF), the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up (BCF-CC Top-Up) and the National Trails Coalition Fund (NTCF). |
Infrastructure Stimulus Fund, Building Canada Fund-Communities Component Top-Up and National Trails Coalition | Strategic | Ongoing | June 2011 |
|
Joint Evaluation of the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component (BCF-CC) and the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF). |
Building Canada Fund-Communities Component and Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund | Strategic | Planned | 2011-2012 |
|
Joint Evaluation of the Provincial-Territorial Base Funding Program (PT Base) and the Gas Tax Fund. |
Provincial-Territorial Infrastructure Base Fund and Gas Tax Fund | Strategic | Planned | 2012-2013 |
|
Joint Evaluation of the Border Infrastructure (BIF) and the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund. |
Border Infrastructure Fund and Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund | Strategic | Planned | 2012-2013 |
- Timeframes presented in the 2009-2010 Report on Plans and Priorities were proposed under the assumption that there would be a full internal audit team as of April 1, 2009 to undertake the identified audit activities.
- Infrastructure Canada’s Internal Audit directorate refreshed the department’s audit universe in January-March 2010 as part of its work to develop the department’s three year Risk-Based Audit Plan. The audit universe represents all aspects of the department as defined major auditable entities (MAEs) that may be subjected to audits and provides an analytical framework for risk assessment. Internal Audit worked with the Finance and Administrative Division to ensure the audit universe is comprehensive. It resulted in an updated universe based on (1) the budget structure of fund centers; (2) the Management Accountability Framework (MAF) elements and (3) the Program Activity Architecture (PAA) structure. The major auditable entities were chosen with the objective of ensuring that each one would be of manageable size, nature and scope, and if audited, it would produce significant and meaningful information for management. When selecting audit engagements for the April 2010 to March 2013 period, the objective was to ensure sufficient coverage of the high-risk and priority areas within the department, as well as contributing to the preparation of a comprehensive overall (holistic) opinion on risk-management, internal controls and governance processes. The timeframes proposed for the internal audits outlined in the 2010-2011 Risk-Based Audit Plan are based on the auditable entities’ priority ranking, and their estimated commencement will depend on the availability of resources within the internal audit function.