This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
Horizontal Initiative |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1. Name of Horizontal Initiative: Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative |
2. Name of Lead Department(s): Transport Canada |
||
3. Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative: October 19, 2006 |
4. End Date of the Horizontal Initiative: March 31, 2014 |
5. Total Federal Funding Allocation:$591,000,000 |
|
6. Description of the Horizontal Initiative: The Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative (APGCI) is intended to strengthen Canada's competitive position in global commerce. It is an integrated package of investment and policy measures that will advance the capacity and efficiency of the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor and Canada's ability to take advantage of it. It reflects the Government of Canada's undertaking to work in partnership with provincial governments, private sector leaders and other stakeholders to further develop and exploit the Gateway. The Initiative seeks to establish Canada's Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor as the best transportation network facilitating global supply chains between North America and Asia. |
|||
Shared Outcome(s): The following are planned shared outcomes and activities for the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative. Key areas include:
Ultimate Outcome:
|
|||
Governance Structure(s): Two Ministers are jointly responsible for the APGCI. The Minister for the Pacific Gateway is the political lead, with support in this effort provided by Transport Canada. The Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities is accountable for the management of the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Transportation Infrastructure Fund. The APGCI is horizontal initiative and its development and implementation involves a number of other key federal departments/agencies. While each is ultimately accountable for its own programs/activities and associated resources from the APGCI funding, the implicated federal departments/agencies are also responsible for contributing to the overarching objectives of the APGCI. All federal partners in this initiative are accountable for the day-to-day management of their respective component of the APGCI. Furthermore, each department/agency is expected to provide regular updates to the two lead Ministers, via the DG-level Interdepartmental Steering Committee on the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative. Partner departments and their role in the Initiative are as follow: |
|||
TRANSPORT CANADA
Transport Canada (TC), as the lead department, reports to the Minister for the Pacific Gateway and to the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities. TC's Pacific Gateway Coordination Branch is responsible for the on-going coordination, management, integration, and strategic development and implementation of the Initiative overall. Other federal departments and agencies, the four western provinces, and stakeholders from the private sector are consulted and involved in building consensus on decisions related to the Initiative. TC is responsible for the development and implementation of the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Transportation Infrastructure Fund (TIF), whose primary objective is to address capacity challenges facing the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor. The projects funded under TIF will enhance the competitiveness, efficiency and capacity of Canada's multi-modal transportation network and will be focused specifically on the movement of international commerce between the Asia-Pacific region and North America. While transportation infrastructure is at the core, the Initiative also focuses on interconnected issues that impact on the further development and exploitation of the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor. As part of a fast track planning and consultative process to inform future decisions and the development of long-term strategic directions for this initiative, TC is engaged in a number of non-infrastructure / competitiveness measures, including:
FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade(DFAIT) Pacific Gateway and 2010 Winter Olympic Games Co-ordinating Group is responsible for the ongoing development and implementation of an international marketing strategy in co-ordination with all stakeholders. The objective is to promote greater use of the Gateway as Asia-Pacific travel and supply chain route of choice for North American and Asia-Pacific importers, exporters, investors and transportation companies. This strategy, developed in consultation with stakeholders, will include targeted communication products, outgoing and incoming missions and showcase the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor's advantages at key trade, investment and technology shows, conferences and seminars in Canada, Asia-Pacific, Europe and North America. Key DFAIT missions abroad will be actively engaged in advancing Canada as the gateway and corridor of choice through dialogue with transportation companies, producers, exporters and/or importers in each of their respective regions to showcase the strengths of the Canadian transportation network, encouraging investment and technology transfer, playing an advocacy role on key APGCI issues such as security and border efficiency, providing intelligence back to Canada to support policy development and help determine what messages resonate in their markets. DFAIT will establish a core group of Trade Commissioners from Asia-Pacific, North American and European missions who will understand the gateway and the opportunities it presents for Canada's economy and are, thereby, able to support the government's objective of establishing Canada as the gateway and corridor of choice between North America and Asia-Pacific. CANADA BORDER SERVICES AGENCY Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) is responsible for the implementation of a marine container inspection operation located at the Port of Prince Rupert. The marine container inspection operation will allow CBSA to develop operations to ensure containers arriving from other countries are properly inspected by means of effective processes and state of the art technology. CBSA's marine container inspection operation will play a vital and strategic role, integrated within the overall Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative. PARKS CANADA AGENCY Parks Canada is responsible for the maintenance and recapitalization of highways that pass through national parks, including the Trans Canada Highway (TCH). The TCH is a major pan-Canadian highway that connects the west coast and its Asia-Pacific linkages to the rest of Canada, especially markets in the western provinces. Parks Canada is in the process of four-laning (twinning) a 10 km section of the congested TCH through the Banff National Park of Canada that will result in improved capacity and efficiency. The funding provided by the APGCI will help ensure the timely completion of this section of highway upgrading and hence support the initiative's objective of improving the movement of goods through the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor. WESTERN ECONOMIC DIVERSIFICATION The Western Economic Diversification (WD) is responsible for two elements of the APGCI; a business opportunities and awareness-raising initiative entitled "Seizing the Gateway Opportunity: Western Canada and the Asia Pacific Challenge", and funding dredging work on the Fraser River to maintain a competitive shipping channel. As part of "Seizing the Gateway Opportunity", WD is consulting with provincial governments, business and other stakeholders and sponsoring research on the impacts, challenges and opportunities of Asia-Pacific commerce on Western Canada in areas such as business practices and labour. To support the APGCI, WD will be undertaking a range of activities such as workshops, studies and partnerships to explore topics such as Asian market opportunities by industry sector and an assessment of the needs of western small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) looking to effectively compete against Asian firms. WD is providing a $4 million grant over two years to the Fraser River Port Authority to support dredging activities on the Fraser River shipping channel. This funding will provide the Fraser River Port Authority with the capacity to maintain its existing business and position itself to attract new business, thereby taking advantage of the Asia-Pacific Gateway opportunities. This temporary measure will enable the port to accommodate the increasingly large shipping vessels, until a long-term solution is developed that would provide for self-sustaining access to port facilities. |
9. Federal Partners |
10. Names of Programs for Federal Partner |
11. Total Allocation ($000) |
12. Forecasted Spending for 2006-07 ($000) |
13. Actual Spending in 2006-07 ($000) |
14. Planned Results for 2006-07 |
15. Achieved Results in 2006-07 |
||
1.Transport Canada |
Transportation Infrastructure Investments (TIF) |
$477,500 |
$10,300 |
$10,300 |
|
|
||
Coordination, Management |
$6,500
|
$1,300
|
$1,125
|
|
|
|||
Competitiveness |
$28,300 |
$500 |
$270 |
|
|
|||
2. Foreign Affairs and international Trade |
Marketing the APGCI |
$7,000 |
$500 |
$365[1] |
|
|
||
3. Canada Border Services Agency |
Marine Container Inspection Operation at Port of Prince Rupert |
$28 000 |
$2,626 |
$370 |
|
|
||
4. Parks Canada Agency |
Banff Trans Canada Highway Twinning |
$37,000 |
$5,000 |
$5,000 |
|
|
||
5. Western Economic Diversification |
Seizing the Gateway opportunity |
$400 |
$100 |
$100 |
|
|
||
Dredging of the Fraser River |
$4,000 |
$2,000 |
$2,000 |
|
|
|||
16. Comments on Variances: [1] The lapse was a result of funding being received late in the fiscal year, a need to reduce one of our key initiatives by roughly 30% and missions abroad either absorbing the cost or by having sought the most cost effective way of participating in the orientation session. |
||||||||
17. Results Achieved by Non-federal Partners: Not applicable |
||||||||
18. Contact: Hélène Dunn (993-7435) |
19. Approved by: Virginia Leung |
20. Date Approved: August 13, 2007 |
Horizontal Initiative |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Name of Horizontal Initiative:Marine Security Horizontal Initiative |
2. Name of Lead Department(s): Transport Canada |
|||||||||||||
3. Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative: Budget 2001 |
4. End Date of the Horizontal Initiative: Ongoing |
5. Total Federal Funding Allocation:Not Applicable |
||||||||||||
6. Description of the Horizontal Initiative: The Marine Security Initiative is a major initiative to improve security at Canadian ports, in waterways and in territorial waters. Elements of this initiative include:
|
||||||||||||||
7. Shared Outcome(s): The following are planned shared outcomes and activities in marine security. Key areas include:
Ultimate Outcome: To improve maritime security at Canadian ports, as well as in waterways and territorial waters. |
||||||||||||||
8. Governance Structure(s): The Government of Canada created the Interdepartmental Marine Security Working Group (IMSWG), chaired by Transport Canada, to identify and co-ordinate federal government actions in support of Canada's objectives concerning public security and anti-terrorism in the maritime transportation sector, as well as its international marine security obligations. Under the guidance of the IMSWG, each partnering department is responsible for the following: Transport Canada: Leads the Government of Canada's initiatives to enhance marine security, including:
Department of Fisheries and Oceans/Canadian Coast Guard: Contributes to the enhancement of the level of domain awareness within the Canadian exclusive economic zone (EEZ) through increased surveillance activities and the implementation of shore-based Automatic Identification System (AIS) infrastructure and the development of a long-range vessel tracking capability. As well, this organization is increasing its level of on-water capability for response to marine security incidents. It also participates in the Marine Security Operations Centres. Public Safety Canada: Provides overall policy coordination for the Public Safety Portfolio on marine security issues and conducts counter-terrorism training exercises. Canada Border Services Agency:
Royal Canadian Mounted Police: National Ports Project; Emergency Response Team training and a partner in the Marine Security Transportation Program. Also participates in the Marine Security Operations Centres. Department of National Defense: Contributes to improve collaboration and coordination though a Maritime Information Management and Data Exchange and enhanced domain awareness employing High Frequency Surface Wave Radar network for the surveillance of strategic high traffic coastal area. Leads the Marine Security Operations Centres. Canadian Security Intelligence Service: No information provided. |
||||||||||||||
9. Federal Partners |
10. Names of Programs for Federal Partner |
11. Total Allocation ($000) |
12. Forecasted Spending for 2006/07 ($000) |
13. Actual Spending in 2006/07 ($000) |
14. Planned Results for 2006/07 |
15. Achieved Results in 2006/07 |
||||||||
1. Transport Canada |
a. Marine Transportation Security Clearance Program |
$11,800 and $2,000 recurring starting - FY 2008/09 |
$2,000 |
$1,329 |
|
|
||||||||
b. Marine Security Oversight and Enforcement Program |
$53,000 and $11,800 recurring |
$4,936 |
$5,372 |
|
|
|||||||||
c. Marine Security Contribution Program |
$115,000 |
$15,952 |
$13,489 |
|
|
|||||||||
d. Marine Security Coordination Fund |
$16,200 and $2,000 recurring starting FY 2008/09 |
$3,586 |
$3,525 |
|
|
|||||||||
2. Department of Fisheries and Oceans |
a. Automatic Identification System (AIS) and Long Range Vessel Identification and Tracking (LRIT) |
$27,500 |
$2,500 |
$2,278 |
|
|
||||||||
b. Funding of Additional Fleet Operations |
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
|
|
|||||||||
c. Enhanced Conservation and Protection Aerial Surveillance Flights |
$7,000(annual |
$7,833* *833k was carried forward from 05/06 |
$7,684 |
|
|
|||||||||
3. Royal Canadian Mounted Police |
a. National Ports Project- National Ports Enforcement Teams (MC1 and MC2) |
$5,288 Dept'l adjustment($1,345) Revised total $3,942 (see Note 2) |
$3,942 |
$3,400 |
|
|
||||||||
b. VACIS - Vehicle and Cargo Inspection System (Smart Border Accord) |
$1,103 |
$1,103 |
$881 |
|
|
|||||||||
c. Marine Intervention Program - Training (MC1) |
$500 |
$500 |
$500 |
|
|
|||||||||
d. Marine Intervention Program (MC2) |
$8,310 Dept'l adjustment ($2,756) Revised total $5,554 (see Note 3) |
$5,554 |
$5,031 |
|
|
|||||||||
e. Marine Transportation Security Clearance Program (MTSCP) (MC1) |
$280 |
$280 |
$198 |
|
|
|||||||||
f. Marine Security Operations Centre (MSOC) (MC2) East/West GL/SLS |
$1,108 |
$1,108 |
$911 |
MSOC East/West (DND lead)
Great Lakes/St. Lawrence Seaway MSOC (RCMP lead)
|
Interdepartmental Design Team:
GL/SLS MSOC
|
|||||||||
g. National Waterside Security Coordination Program (MC2) |
$839 |
$839 |
$594 |
|
|
|||||||||
Note:
|
||||||||||||||
5. Public Safety Canada |
0 |
0 |
||||||||||||
6. Department of National Defence |
a. High Frequency Surface Wave Radar (HFSWR) at four-five sites
|
a. Allocation: $0; |
Nil
|
Nil b. MSOC Spending FY 2006/07: $8,104 |
|
|
||||||||
7. Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) and Canadian Security Intelligence Services(CSIS) |
a. Visas for seafarers joining ships in Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
8. Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) |
b. Passenger and Crew Screening Initiative |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
16. Comments on Variances: See results portion. |
||||||||||||||
17. Results Achieved by Non-federal Partners: Not applicable |
||||||||||||||
18. Contact: Michel Tremblay, Acting Chief, Planning and Resource Management - Marine Security, Transport Canada |
19. Approved by: Laureen Kinney, Director General, Marine Security, Transport Canada (613) 991-4173 |
20. Date Approved: August 31, 2007 |