Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Symbol of the Government of Canada

ARCHIVED - Canadian Grain Commission


Warning This page has been archived.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.

Section III - Supplementary Information

Organizational information

Organizational Structure of the Canadian Grain Commission


CGC partnerships

The CGC is integral to the functioning of Canada’s grain industry. In our role as a neutral, third party regulator and arbiter, the CGC works in partnership with virtually every participant in the industry.


Key partners Areas of Co-operation
Industry
Producers and producers’ organizations
Grain Companies
Railways
Processors
University Laboratories
Plant Breeders
Instrument Manufacturing Companies
Canadian Wheat Board
Pulse Canada
Canadian International Grains Institute
Canadian Seed Institute
Canadian Soybean Exporters Association
Grain Exporters
Ontario Wheat Producers’ Marketing Board

Setting grain quality standards
Operation of the grain quality and quantity assurance system
Provide grain shipment and unload data interchange
Dispute resolution for quality and quantity issues
Development and implementation of policies and regulations
Sharing market information
Market development and support
Research and technology transfer
Auditing and certifying industry IP systems

Portfolio departments and agencies

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Canadian Food Inspection Agency
Canadian Dairy Commission
Farm Credit Canada
National Farm Products Council

Grain data co-ordination
Sharing knowledge
Research
Strategic planning
Meeting international tolerances for toxic contaminants in grain
Shared quality and quantity assurance program delivery

Other government departments
Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada
Statistics Canada
Industry Canada
Health Canada
Canada Border Services Agency
Transport Canada
Justice Canada
Treasury Board of Canada
Sharing knowledge
Facilitating international trade
Publication of grain statistics and funding of international consulting projects
Market development and support
Grain shipment and unload data interchange
Inspection and certification of terminal and transfer elevator scales
Regulation of grain imports
Foreign

U.S. Department of Agriculture (Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration)
Japanese Food Agency
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (Australia)
State Administration of Grain (China)
Agropecuaria (Uruguay)

Shared quality assurance program delivery
Facilitating international trade
Research
Technology training
Information Exchange


Table 1: Comparison of Planned to Actual Spending (including FTEs)


($ thousands) 2004-2005 Actual 2005-2006 Actual 2006-2007
Main Estimates Planned Spending Total Authorities Total Actual
Deliver inspection and testing services1 39 186 42 535 49 363 49 363 49 894 41 566
Deliver weighing services1 12 092 12 637 15 996 15 996 16 371 12 316
Conduct research to understand and measure grain quality 8 345 10 077 9 171 9 171 9 355 9 582
Protect producers' rights1 3 662 4 895 2 208 2 208 2 339 3 740
Total 63 285 70 144 76 738 76 738 77 959 67 204
Plus: Cost of services received without charge 2 345 803 1 733 1 733 1 733 352
Net Cost of Department 65 630 70 947 78 471 78 471 79 692 67 556
Full Time Equivalents 621 635 712 712 712 631

1 Includes Canadian Grain Commission (CGC) Revolving Fund activities.

This table represents the total Revolving Fund and Appropriation for main estimates, planned spending, total authorities, and actual spending.

The difference between planned spending and total authorities is $1 221 K which reflects allocations from Treasury Board for severance pay and collective agreements.

The difference between total actuals and total authorities reflects the CGC’s revolving fund surplus of approximately $11 M.

The difference between actual and planned FTEs reflects the following:

  • Planned FTEs for 2006-2007 in the RPP should have been reflected as 664.
  • The increase in grain volumes and corresponding work volumes caused a delay in hiring.

The difference between total actuals and planned spending for cost of services received without charge is a result of an overstatement of planned spending for 2006-2007 in the RPP, which should have been $396.

Table 2: Resources by Program Activities

Table 2: Resources by Program Activities

Table 3: Voted and Statutory Items


Vote or Statutory Item ($ thousands) Truncated Vote or Statutory Wording 2006-2007
Main Estimates Planned Spending Total Authorities Actual
40 Operating expenditures 24 666 24 666 24 666 24 666
40a Program expenditures - - 1 221 1 221
(S) CGC Revolving Fund (127) (127) (127) (127)
(S) Contributions to employee benefit plans 10 683 10 683 10 683 10 683
  Total 35 222 35 222 36 443 36 443

The summary of voted Appropriations represents the amount of funding received by the CGC through the approved votes. It compares main estimates, planned spending, and total authorities to what the CGC actually spent.

The difference between planned spending and total authorities is $1 221 K which reflects allocations from Treasury Board for severance pay and collective agreements.

Actual appropriation differs from the revolving fund financial statements by $733 K. The CGC received a recovery of severance pay from the Treasury Board and recorded it as a reduction of expenses versus recording it as appropriation revenue.

Table 4: Services Received Without Charge


($ thousands) 2006-2007 Actual Spending
Accommodation provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada -
Contributions covering employers' share of employees' insurance premiums and expenditures paid by Treasury Board Secretariat (excluding revolving funds 201
Workers' compensation coverage provided by Social Development Canada. 151
Salary and associated expenditures of legal services provided by the Department of Justice Canada -
Total 2006-2007 Services received without charge 352

This table represents all services provided and paid by other government departments on behalf of the CGC.

Table 5: Sources of Respendable Revenue


Sources of Respendable Revenue ($ thousands) Actual 2004-05 Actual 2005-06 2006-2007
Main Estimates Planned Revenue Total Authorities Actual
Deliver inspection and testing services
Inspection, registration, and cancellation   26 323       27 627
Other   1 330       2 482
Total   27 653 31 326 31 326 31 326 30 109
Deliver weighing services
Weighing, registration, and cancellation   10 633       11 542
Other   43       559
Total   10 676 9 325 9 325 9 325 12 101
Conduct research to understand and measure grain quality
Other            
Total   - - - - -
Protect producers' rights
Licences   183       502
Other   259       4
Total   442 865 865 865 506
Total Respendable Revenue 35 942 38 771 41 516 41 516 41 516 42 716

This table identifies all sources of revenue generated, excluding appropriation. Respendable revenues represent funds generated through fees and contracts for services rendered by the CGC. These revenues are used to offset a portion of the costs of providing these services.

Table 6: Revolving Funds


Statement of Operations
($ thousands) Actual 2004-05 Actual 2005-06 2006-2007
Main Estimates Planned Spending Authorized Actual
Revenue
Appropriation 21 829 27 305 35 222 35 222 36 443 35 710
Respendable 35 942 38 771 41 516 41 516 41 516 42 716
Total revenues 57 771 66 076 76 738 76 738 77 959 78 426
Expenses
Operating:
Salaries and employeebenefits 49 696 55 310 56 215 56 215 57 173 53 832
Depreciation 1 857 2 174 1 739 1 739 1 739 1 974
Repairs and maintenance 430 422 641 641 652 490
Administrative and support services 9 140 10 093 11 919 11 919 12 122 8 456
Utilities, materials, andsupplies 1 947 1 977 2 719 2 719 2 765 2 258
Marketing 215 168 186 186 189 194
Total expenses 63 285 70 144 73 419 73 419 74 640 67 204
Surplus (Deficit) (5 514) (4 068) 3 319 3 319 3 319 11 222

This table reflects and allocates the costs associated with the total revenues generated.

The difference between planned spending and total authorities is $1 221 K which reflects allocations from Treasury Board for severance pay and collective agreements.

Actual appropriation differs from the revolving fund financial statements by $733 K. The CGC received a recovery of severance pay from the Treasury Board and recorded it as a reduction of expenses versus recording it as appropriation revenue.


Statement of Cash Flows
($ thousands) Actual 2004-05 Actual 2005-06 2006-2007
Main Estimates Planned Spending  Authorized Actual
Surplus (Deficit) (5 514) (4 068) 3 319 3 319 3 319 11 222
Add non-cash items:
Depreciation/amortization 1 857 2 174 1 739 1 739 1 739 1 974
Provision for employee termination benefits 654 842 - - - 1 086
Gain on disposal of property and equipment (7) (3) - - - (13)
Change in working capital 1 357 (1 047) - - - (1 260)
Investing activities:
Acquisition of depreciable assets (2 962) (1 767) (4 931) (4 931) (4 931) (1 600)
Cash Surplus (requirement) (4 615) (3 869) 127 127 127 11 409

This table converts the financial statement information from book value to a cash basis.


Projected Use of Authority
($ thousands) Actual
2004-05
Actual
2005-06
2006-2007
Main Estimates Planned Spending  Authorized  Actual
Authority 2 254 2 381 2 381 2 381 2 381 2 381
Drawdown:
Balance as at April 1 16 780 12 165 127 127 127 8 296
Operating (deficit)/surplus (16 780) (12 165) - - - (8 296)
 
Projected surplus (drawdown) (4 615) (3 869) 127 127 127 11 409
Projected Balance at March 31 ( 2 361) (1 488) 2 635 2 635 2 635 13 790

This table represents the projected balance which is made up of the Accumulated net charge (April 1), ANCAFA (cash account) plus the CGC's Revolving Fund authority.

Table 7: 2006-2007 User Fee Reporting - User Fees Act

Table 7: 2006-2007 User Fee Reporting - User Fees Act:Actual revenue exceeds full cost due to the fact that the CGC handled above average grain volumes. Forecasted grain volumes were 47.6 M tonnes versus actual grain volumes of 55.8 M tonnes.

Actual revenue exceeds full cost due to the fact that the CGC handled above average grain volumes. Forecasted grain volumes were 47.6 M tonnes versus actual grain volumes of 55.8 M tonnes.

Table 7: Continued

2006-2007 User Fee Reporting - User Fees Act

Table 7: 2006-2007 User Fee Reporting - User Fees Act - Most CGC revenue is generated from fees charged for mandated inspection and weighing of grain exported through licensed terminal or transfer elevators.

Most CGC revenue is generated from fees charged for mandated inspection and weighing of grain exported through licensed terminal or transfer elevators.

Table 7: Continued

2006-2007 User Fee Reporting - Policy on Service Standards for External Fees


Supplementary information on Service Standards for External Fees can be found at: http://grainscanada.gc.ca/pubs/corporate/service/fees-e.htm


Table 8: CGC Financial Statements


Fiscal year 2006-2007 CGC audited financial statements can be accessed using the following link: http://grainscanada.gc.ca/pubs/corporate/finance/financgc07-eng.pdf.

Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with accrual accounting principles. The unaudited supplementary information presented in the financial tables in the DPR is prepared on a modified cash basis of accounting in order to be consistent with appropriation-based reporting.

Table 9: Audits and Evaluations for Fiscal Year 2006–2007


Internal Audits 2006-2007

Completed Reviews:

Scheduled Reviews:

  • User Fees – Review progress of the User Fee Committee
  • Section 34 Authorities (HR and other)
  • Petty cash and cash float processes
  • Use of service standards in Performance Management (IS)
  • Project Management Process (PMP)

Note: the scheduled reviews were deferred to a later date as available resources were used to implement the requirements of the internal audit policy.


Table 10: Client-Centred Service


Supplementary information on Client Centred Service can be found at http://grainscanada.gc.ca/pubs/corporate/service/client-e.htm

Table 11: Travel Policies


Comparison to the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat Travel Directive, Rates and Allowances
The Canadian Grain Commission follows the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat Special Travel Authorities.
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pubs_pol/hrpubs/TBM_113/STA_e.asp


Comparison to the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat Travel Directive, Rates and Allowances

The Canadian Grain Commission follows the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat Travel Directive, Rates and Allowances.
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pubs_pol/hrpubs/TBM_113/td-dv_e.asp
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pubs_pol/hrpubs/TBM_113/menu-travel-voyage_e.asp