Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Symbol of the Government of Canada

ARCHIVED - Department of Justice Canada

Warning This page has been archived.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.





2009-10
Report on Plans and Priorities



Department of Justice Canada






Supplementary Information (Tables)






Table of Contents




Details on Transfer Payment Programs (TPP)

The principal objective of the Department of Justice Three-Year Plan for Transfer Payment Programs is to provide applicants, recipients, parliamentarians, and other stakeholders with information essential to identifying planned departmental activities that might have an impact on specific programs of interest.  More information can be found at http://canada.justice.gc.ca/eng/dept-min/tpp-ppt/index.html.

Strategic outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values

Program activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Aboriginal Courtwork Program (Voted)

Start date: April 1st, 1978

End date: March 31st, 2013

Description:

The objective of the Aboriginal Courtwork Program is to improve access to justice by helping Aboriginal people involved in the criminal justice system obtain fair, just, equitable and culturally-sensitive treatment. It is the only ongoing contribution funding justice program available to all Aboriginal people (adult and youth) regardless of status and residency.  The Program provides Aboriginal persons charged with an offence with timely and accurate information on their rights, obligations, roles and responsibilities at the earliest possible stage of the criminal justice process.  Services also include referring clients to appropriate legal and social resources in their community. Aboriginal Courtworkers serve as a “bridge” between criminal justice officials and Aboriginal people and communities, by providing information, cultural context, liaison and promoting communications and understanding.

Recipients: Federal contributions will be made to provincial governments to provide Aboriginal Courtwork services to Aboriginal persons (adults and youths) charged with an offence under any federal or provincial statute, municipal by-law. A province may authorize one or more agencies to deliver Aboriginal Courtwork services on its behalf.  All designated delivery agencies will be accountable to the funders. In addition, the new Projects in Support of the Aboriginal Courtwork Program component provide modest support for projects that further the mandate of the Program.

Expected results:

Culturally sensitive services are provided to Aboriginal people charged with an offence.


Program Activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs
  Forecast Spending
2008-09
Planned Spending
2009-10
Planned Spending
2010-11
Planned Spending
2011-12
Total grants $0 $0 $0 $0
Total contributions $5,361,363 $4,911,363 $4,911,363 $4,911,363
Total Transfer payments $5,361,363 $4,911,363 $4,911,363 $4,911,363

Planned evaluations:

Summative Evaluation completed June 2008. National client survey planned for 2011-2012


Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values

Program Activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Aboriginal Justice Strategy Fund (Voted)

Start date: April 1st, 1991 as Aboriginal Justice Initiative, renewed as AJS in 1996, 2002, 2007

End date: March 31st, 2012

Description:

The Aboriginal Justice Strategy (AJS) enables Aboriginal communities to have increased involvement in the local administration of justice and, as such, provides timely and effective alternatives to mainstream justice processes in appropriate circumstances.  AJS programs are also aimed at reducing the rates of victimization, crime and incarceration among Aboriginal people in communities operating AJS programs, and helping the mainstream justice system become more responsive and sensitive to the needs and culture of Aboriginal communities.

Recipients: a) bands, First Nations, Tribal Councils, local, regional and national Aboriginal organizations; b) agencies and institutions of regional/municipal governments; c) non-profit community organizations, societies, and associations which have voluntarily associated themselves for a non-profit purpose; d) provincial and territorial governments; e) individuals; and, f) for-profit corporations, so long as these corporations will not make a profit on the work performed.

Expected results:

  • A reduction in crime and incarceration rates in communities with AJS programs.
  • Safer, healthier Aboriginal communities where AJS programs are in place.
  • Increased Aboriginal community involvement in the local administration of justice.
  • Ability to track trends in Aboriginal community justice over time.
  • Mainstream justice is more responsive to the needs of Aboriginal people.

Program Activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs
  Forecast Spending
2008-09
Planned Spending
2009-10
Planned Spending
2010-11
Planned Spending
2011-12
Total grants $29,105 $260,000 $260,000 $260,000
Total contributions $11,900,809 $12,240,000 $12,240,000 $12,240,000
Total Transfer payments $11,929,914 $12,500,000 $12,500,000 $12,500,000

Planned evaluations:

Formative evaluation planned for completion 2008-09

Summative evaluation planned for completion 2011-12


Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values

Program Activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Access to Justice in Both Official Languages Support Fund (Voted)

Start date: April 1st, 2003

End date: March 31st, 2013

Description:

In June 2008, the Government launched the Roadmap for Canada's Linguistic Duality 2008-2013: Acting for the Future.  The Department of Justice supports the Roadmap through the Initiative in Support of Access to Justice in Both Official Languages.  This Initiative includes a consulting mechanism, a Justice Training Component to encourage young bilingual Canadians to pursue law related careers in justice that can be practiced in the other official language and a grants and the renewal of a contributions programme called the Access to Justice in Both Official Languages Support Fund (the Support Fund).

Objectives: In order to attain the objectives of the Initiative, the Department will invest resources into the Support Fund.  All projects and activities must respond to one of the following objectives:

  • Increase the capacity of the justice system and its stakeholders to offer justice services in both official languages. 
  • Increase awareness in the legal community and official language minority and majority communities concerning their rights and issues related to access to justice in both official languages.

Recipients: Canadian not-for-profit organizations.
Provincial and territorial governments, regional and municipal governments, provincial and territorial Crown corporations.
Canadian institutions/boards of education, including Centres for jurilinguistics.

Expected results:

Training priorities established following results of the nation wide needs analysis on training needs in both official languages in the area of justice. Coordination mechanism related to training is created and functional. 8 financial agreements concluded in terms of core funding from the Support Fund. 30% of financed projects will focus on awareness or knowledge. 35% of projects will have other sources of funding (other than from the Department). 5 projects will fall under the training component.


Program Activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs
  Forecast Spending
2008-09
Planned Spending
2009-10
Planned Spending
2010-11
Planned Spending
2011-12
Total grants $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
Total contributions $2,742,845 $5,176,846 $7,175,846 $7,175,846
Total Transfer payments $2,792,845 $5,226,846 $7,225,846 $7,225,846

Planned evaluations:

Case studies in 2010-2011


Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values

Program Activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Access to Justice Services – the Territories (Voted)

Start date: April 1st, 1997

End date: March 31st, 2012

Description:

The objective of the Access to Justice Services Agreements is to enable the territories to deliver access-to-justice-related services in the areas of Legal Aid (both criminal and civil), Aboriginal Courtwork and Public Legal Education and Information. They are contribution agreements between the federal government and Canada's three territories, the Yukon, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut, and the means by which the federal government provides funding support for these access to justice services.

Recipients: Contributions will be made to those territorial governments that undertake to provide services to eligible persons and eligible young persons in matters relating to the overall objectives of the Access to Justice Services Agreements. The territories may authorize entities ("territorial access to justice services delivery entities") to provide services in these matters. In instances of court-ordered counsel in federal prosecutions, the recipient may also be a territorial access to justice services delivery entity.

Expected results:

Territories are enabled to deliver access to justice services (Legal Aid (criminal and civil), Aboriginal Courtwork and Public Legal Education and Information).


Program Activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs
  Forecast Spending
2008-09
Planned Spending
2009-10
Planned Spending
2010-11
Planned Spending
2011-12
Total grants $0 $0 $0 $0
Total contributions $5,369,480 $4,856,593 $4,856,593 $4,856,593
Total Transfer payments $5,369,480 $4,856,593 $4,856,593 $4,856,593

Planned evaluations:

A summative evaluation of the Aboriginal Courtwork Program, which included the territories, was completed in June 2008.  An Aboriginal Courtwork client survey is planned for 2011-2012.   The Department will undertake an impact evaluation of its Legal Aid Program, including the territories, to be concluded by March 31, 2012.


Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values

Program Activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Implementation of official languages requirement under the Contraventions Act (a.k.a. Contraventions Act Fund)  (Voted)

Start date: April 1st, 2002

End date: March 31st, 2013

Description:

The mechanics of the Contraventions Act includes the identification of federal offences that are to be considered “contraventions” and the establishment of a scheme to process these contraventions.  In 2001, the Federal Court was asked to clarify the extent to which judicial and extra-judicial language rights requirements were applicable in the context of the Contraventions Act.  The Court concluded that while the federal government is authorized to use the prosecution scheme of a province or territory to process federal contraventions, it must comply with all language rights requirements that would be applicable in the context of a federal prosecution scheme.  More specifically, the Court stated that any level of government that processes federal contraventions is, in fact, acting on behalf of the Government of Canada.

Following the Federal Court decision, the Department of Justice initiated the process of amending existing Contraventions Act agreements to include new provisions addressing language rights requirements identified in the ruling.  Such provisions are now also an integral part of all new agreements with other provinces. To support this process, the Department of Justice has received funding that is referred to as the Contraventions Act Fund.

Recipients: Provincial and territorial departments and agencies and municipalities designated by provincial and territorial governments as being responsible for judicial activities and for providing extra-judicial services in both official languages.

Expected results:

  • Increase capacity to offer in both official languages judicial activities and extra-judicial services in relation to the prosecution of federal contraventions.
  • The judicial activities relating to the prosecution of federal offences under the Contraventions Act respect the language rights found in section 530 and 530.1 of the Criminal Code and the extra-judicial services provided respect Part IV of the Official Languages Act.

Program Activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs
  Forecast Spending
2008-09
Planned Spending
2009-10
Planned Spending
2010-11
Planned Spending
2011-12
Total grants $0 $0 $0 $0
Total contributions $4,652,900 $9,094,900 $9,094,900 $9,094,900
Total Transfer payments $4,652,900 $9,094,900 $9,094,900 $9,094,900

Planned evaluations:

2009-10: Technical Study of the Contraventions Act *

2010-11: Mid-term Evaluation of the Fund

2011-12: Summative Evaluation of the Fund **

* As part the research plan, the technical study includes the range of questions addressed, along with the methodology, budget and timeframe.
** The summative evaluation will be conducted over two years, 2011-2012 and 2012-2013.


Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values

Program Activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Intensive Rehabilitative Custody and Supervision Program (Voted)

Start date: April 1st, 2002

End date: March 31st, 2013

Description:

The overall objective of this Program is to financially assist provinces and territories in providing the specialized therapeutic services required for the implementation of the Intensive Rehabilitative Custody and Supervision (IRCS) sentence [paragraph 42(2)(r) and subsection 42(7) of the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA)] and other sentencing options applicable under the YCJA to serious violent youth offenders with mental health problems. It is expected that these services may reduce future violence in those convicted of the most serious violent offences.

Recipients: Provinces and territories

Expected results:

Through the contribution agreements signed under this Program, provinces and territories will have the capacity to implement sentencing options that involve specialized treatment programs to address the mental health issues of serious violent youth offenders


Program Activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs
  Forecast Spending
2008-09
Planned Spending
2009-10
Planned Spending
2010-11
Planned Spending
2011-12
Total grants $0 $0 $0 $0
Total contributions $9,065,996 $11,048,000 $11,048,000 $11,048,000
Total Transfer payments $9,065,996 $11,048,000 $11,048,000 $11,048,000

Planned evaluations:

A summative evaluation is planned for 2009-2010


Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values

Program Activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Legal Aid Program (Voted)

Start date: August 17th, 1971

End date: March 31st, 2012

Description:

The objective of the federal Legal Aid Program is to contribute to sustaining a national system of justice, that helps to ensure that economically disadvantaged persons have access to the justice system, through contribution funding in support of criminal, youth criminal justice and immigration and refugee legal aid services provided by the provinces (funding for criminal and civil legal aid in the territories is provided through the Access to Justice Services Agreements).

Recipients: Provinces

Expected results:

Provinces are enabled to provide legal aid services to eligible persons involved in serious criminal, youth criminal justice, and immigration and refugee matters.  As well, PSAT cases and federal prosecutions are not stayed due to lack of funded defence counsel.


Program Activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs
  Forecast Spending
2008-09
Planned Spending
2009-10
Planned Spending
2010-11
Planned Spending
2011-12
Total grants $0 $0 $0 $0
Total contributions $119,827,507 $119,827,507 $119,827,507 $119,827,507
Total Transfer payments $119,827,507 $119,827,507 $119,827,507 $119,827,507

Planned evaluations:

The Legal Aid Program impact evaluation for the current five-year period is planned to be completed in fiscal year 2011-12.


Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values

Program Activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Public Security and Anti-terrorism Legal Aid (Voted)

Start date: April 1st, 2001

End date: March 31st, 2012

Description:

The objective of the Program is to provide contributions to the provinces, territories and their legal aid delivery entities to cover their costs for persons eligible for legal aid and charged under the federal government’s anti-terrorism legislation.  This program is necessary given the federal government’s strong policy interest in national security and related legal proceedings.

Recipients: Provinces, territories or their legal aid delivery entities

Expected results:

Canada-wide legal systems that  are efficient, fair, relevant and accessible, and that  promote public confidence in access to justice


Program Activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs
  Forecast Spending
2008-09
Planned Spending
2009-10
Planned Spending
2010-11
Planned Spending
2011-12
Total grants $0 $0 $0 $0
Total contributions $6,492,663 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000
Total other types of transfer payments $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Transfer payments $6,492,663 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000

Planned evaluations:

The Department will undertake an impact evaluation of its legal aid program, including Public Security and Anti-terrorism legal aid, to be concluded by March 31, 2012.


Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values

Program Activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Supporting Families experiencing Separation and Divorce Fund (SF Fund) (Voted) 1

Start date: April 1st, 2009

End date: March 31st, 2014

Description:

The SF Fund is a key component of the Supporting Families Experiencing Separation and Divorce Initiative (SFI) which was announced by the Minister of Justice in September, 2008. The fund is aimed at facilitating access to the family justice system for families experiencing separation and divorce, through various services, programs, and information resources, particularly those that promote compliance with financial support and custody/access obligations. The Fund also supports projects that promote public awareness about family law reforms concerning parenting arrangements, child support guidelines and support enforcements.

Recipients: Provincial and territorial departments, agencies, or other organizations designated by provincial and territorial governments as responsible for child support, the enforcement of support orders and agreements and parenting arrangement programs and services are eligible to apply for contribution funding under the Family Justice Initiatives and the Pilot Projects components of the Fund.

Any of the following may apply for contribution or class grant funding under the Public Legal Education and Information and Professional Training component of the Fund:

  1. individuals;
  2. non-profit professional organizations, societies or associations;
  3. other non-profit organizations, societies or associations;
  4. educational institutions;
  5. private sector organizations sponsoring non-profit projects in partnership with federal, provincial, or territorial governments.

Expected results:

Increased compliance by parents with the terms and conditions of family law support, custody and access obligations.


Program Activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs
  Forecast Spending
2008-09
1
Planned Spending
2009-10
Planned Spending
2010-11
Planned Spending
2011-12
Total grants $0 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
Total contributions $0 $15,950,000 $15,950,000 $15,950,000
Total Transfer payments $0 $16,000,000 $16,000,000 $16,000,000

Planned evaluations:

No evaluation is planned for 2009/2010 (first year of the Initiative). The evaluation framework, performance measurement structure and evaluation plan will be developed in 2009/2010.

1 Note: Supporting Families Experiencing Separation and Divorce Fund will replace the former Child-centred Family Justice Fund which ends on March 31st, 2009.


Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values

Program Activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Victims of Crime Initiative (Voted)

Start date: April 1st, 2000

End date: March 31st, 2011

Description:

The Policy Centre for Victim Issues (PCVI) administers the federal Victims Fund, which has a broad set of objectives that are intended to improve the experience of victims in the criminal justice system.  The Fund can be accessed by victim service providers, non-governmental organizations, provincial and territorial governments, victim advocates and researchers, as well as victims (Canadians who are victimized abroad, as well as CSC registered victims and their support persons to attend NPB hearings).

Recipients: a) individuals; b) national, provincial, territorial, municipal, Aboriginal, community or professional organizations, societies or associations; c) Canadian educational institutions/Boards of Education; d) International governmental and non-government organizations including bodies associated or affiliated with organizations of which Canada is a member, which have as their purpose victim advocacy, services, assistance or raising awareness about the impact of victimization; e) private sector organizations sponsoring non-profit projects; f) Bands, Tribal Councils and self-governing First Nations who are working to provide services and assistance to victims of crime in Aboriginal communities; g) provincial, territorial, municipal and regional governments and agencies.

Expected results:

  • Increased access to services for victims;
  • increased willingness of victims to participate in the criminal justice system;
  • increased awareness and understanding among criminal justice system personnel, service providers and victims of victim issues, legislation and
  • services available; and
  • reduced financial hardship for victims.

Program Activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs
  Forecast Spending
2008-09
Planned Spending
2009-10
Planned Spending
2010-11
Planned Spending
2011-12
Total grants $850,000 $850,000 $500,000 $0
Total contributions $4,168,150 $7,958,000 $5,250,000 $0
Total Transfer payments $5,018,150 $8,808,000 $5,750,000 $0

Planned evaluations:

Case studies & final evaluation


Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values

Program Activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Youth Justice Fund (Voted)

Start date: April 1st, 1999

End date: March 31st, 2010

Description:

The overall objective of funding under the Youth Justice Fund is to encourage a fairer and more effective youth justice system.  Funding is available to help promote and implement alternative approaches to youth justice practices.  Priorities are set annually based on identified gaps and emerging federal youth justice policies and priorities.  Additional resources have been provided to the Youth Justice Fund for two new on-going priorities - Youth Crime Prevention (Guns, Gangs and Drugs) and Youth Justice Anti-Drug Treatment Component.

A variety of activities are eligible for funding support under the different components of the Youth Justice Fund.  For example:

  • training/educational activities for professionals and service providers;
  • the organization and hosting of community meetings to create awareness of youth justice activities in a community and/or build support for a community-based youth justice initiative or workshops/conferences that encourage the sharing of information on best practices and lessons learned as provide opportunities for various sectors to meet and develop cross-sectoral solutions to support them in assuming effective roles;
  • demonstration projects that test an innovative approach to delivering youth justice services at any key stage of the youth justice process and/or targeted at specific populations or issues such as reduce the over-representation of Aboriginal youth in the justice system, respond to youth in the youth justice system with mental health issues including FASD, respond to gang involved youth and violent offenders or, respond to youth with illicit substance abuse issues; and
  • some components allow for research and evaluation activities to determine whether programs/activities are effective in dealing with youth in conflict with the law and/or are relevant for other regions/jurisdictions or which synthesize the results of existing research or which contribute to a growing awareness and recognition of promising practices and models for on-going or emerging youth justice issues.

Recipients: Non-governmental organizations, youth justice stakeholders, Aboriginal organizations and provinces/territories

Expected results:

Youth Justice Fund

The overall expected result is a fairer, more effective youth justice system

Short Term and Intermediate Outcomes

  • Increased responsiveness to emerging issues
  • Increased community involvement
  • Increased collaboration and knowledge development
  • More effective rehabilitation and reintegration of young persons
  • More integrated coordinated approach

Within the Youth Justice Fund framework, the Guns, Gangs and Drugs and Anti-Drug Component (NADS) have the following expected results:

Guns, Gangs and Drugs

  • Additional or enhanced programs aimed at preventing youth involvement in guns, gangs and drugs are being developed and used by the youth justice system
  • Targeted youth presented with a choice or alternative to guns, gangs and drugs.

National Anti-Drug Strategy

  • Enhanced capacity to plan/deliver a range of treatment services & programs to targeted populations

Program Activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs
  Forecast Spending
2008-09
Planned Spending
2009-10
Planned Spending
2010-11
Planned Spending
2011-12
Total grants $453,130 $730,000 $730,000 $730,000
Total contributions $3,312,233 $4,275,000 $4,275,000 $4,275,000
Total Transfer payments $3,765,363 $5,005,000 $5,005,000 $5,005,000

Planned evaluations:

A summative evaluation is planned for 2009-2010


Strategic Outcome: A fair, relevant and accessible justice system that reflects Canadian values

Program Activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Youth Justice Services Funding Program (Voted)

Start date: April 1st, 1984

End date: March 31st, 2011

Description:

The overall objective of this Program is to support the policy directions of the Youth Justice Initiative. The specific objectives of the individual agreements are to support and promote an appropriate range of programs and services that: encourage accountability measures for unlawful behaviour that are proportionate and timely; encourage the effective rehabilitation and reintegration of young persons into their communities; target the formal court process to the most serious offences; and target detention and custody to the most serious offences.

Recipients: Provinces and territories

Expected results:

The contribution agreements will support a sustainable youth justice system that is capable of innovation and supports federal youth justice priorities.


Program Activity: A1 – Justice policies, laws and programs
  Forecast Spending
2008-09
Planned Spending
2009-10
Planned Spending
2010-11
Planned Spending
2011-12
Total grants $0 $0 $0 $0
Total contributions $177,302,415 $177,302,415 $177,302,415 $177,302,415
Total Transfer payments $177,302,415 $177,302,415 $177,302,415 $177,302,415

Planned evaluations:

A summative evaluation is planned for 2009-2010



Green Procurement

How is your department planning to meet the objectives of the Policy on Green Procurement?

Through the Department of Justice’s Sustainable Development Strategy 2007-2009, objectives, targets and performance indicators have been established to meet objectives defined in the Policy on Green Procurement.

Has your department established green procurement targets?


Yes    

Describe the green procurement targets that have been set by your department and indicate the associated benefits anticipated.

The Department of Justice’s Sustainable Development Strategy 2007-2009 contains three objectives, among which Improving the environmental sustainability of the Department’s physical operations. A key target of this objective is the implementation of the Government’s Green Procurement Policy. To this end, the following performance indicators have been established:

  • All appropriate staff will receive training on the application of the Green Procurement Policy.
  • Obtain support from PWGSC in the implementation and tracking of procurement practices.
  • Promote usage of established standing offers (established by PWGSC or internal to the department) as they already support the Green Procurement Policy
  • Encourage client groups to consider targeting greener products in their invitations to tender.
  • Spending data to be assessed, baseline established and specific targets developed by 2009 for selected categories of purchases in accordance with IFMS capabilities.
  • A standard reporting mechanism is under consideration within the Integrated Financial and Materiel System (IFMS) to monitor compliance with the policy once the criteria for reporting has been defined.
  • Develop furniture standards for Department for furniture procurement and life cycle.
  • Departmental projects/initiatives will include mission statements.


Sustainable Development Strategy

The Department’s current 2007-2009 sustainable development strategy was tabled in December of 2006 under the provisions of the Auditor General Act. This RPP captures the strategy’s final 8 months of activity (2009) but also straddles the first 3 months of 2010.  For planning purposes, it is being assumed that the strategy will continue into this period and beyond until a further strategy is prepared under the new Federal Sustainable Development Act.

The current strategy has three objectives:

  • Further develop the capacity of the Department to support the provision of legal services related to sustainable development.
  • Incorporate sustainable development principles and practices into the Department’s policy and program operations.
  • Improve the environmental sustainability of the Department’s physical operations.

These objectives, along with their respective targets and performance indicators, are aimed at improving the existing capacity and practices in the Department towards achieving sustainable development in its internal operations, as well as in its work with its client organizations.

The complete text of the Sustainable Development Strategy 2007-2009 may be obtained at: http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/dept-min/pub/sds-sdd/index.html

Objective 1: Further develop the capacity of the Department to support the provision of legal services related to sustainable development.


OBJECTIVES/TARGETS COMMITMENTS
Target 1.1:
The Department’s role in providing legal services related to sustainable development is considered, when appropriate.

Target 1.2:
The Department builds on its current level of awareness of sustainable development by developing a further capacity to provide advice on the legal implications of policy and program decisions related to sustainable development issues facing the government and client departments and agencies, when appropriate.

  • Organize and host a follow-up sustainability conference in March 2009
  • Training sessions on Legal Services support for SD
  • Consider how DoJ legal services can enhance its support of client SD strategies
  • Strengthening of established networks and working groups to consider sustainability in the provision of legal services.
  • Conduct research and analysis of sustainability principles and current issues and identify case law and best practices on the application of these principles and practices in the provision of legal services.
  • Develop a departmental guide for LSUs to assist in their response to environmental petitions
  • Guidelines are developed to support staff in offering additional advice and services.
  • Learning and practical tools are developed to assist employees.
  • Training is offered and conducted to build additional expertise in the Department, when appropriate.
  • Host and promote the sustainable development training course offered by the Canada School of Public Service.
  • Legal risk management is linked to sustainable development.

Objective 2: Incorporate sustainable development principles and practices into the Department’s policy and program operations.


OBJECTIVES/TARGETS COMMITMENTS
Target 2.1:
Sustainable development principles and practices are incorporated in the Department’s policies and programs, when appropriate.
  • Ensure and monitor compliance with Cabinet Directive on Strategic Environmental Assessments
  • Operationalize best practices such as the consideration of sustainable development principles into program and policy development
  • Develop and provide appropriate guidelines and learning tool
  • Policy Branch participation in DOJ’s 2009 Sustainable Development conference
  • Policy Branch to analyse survey of policy staff and partners as part of on-going policy and program research and analysis
Target 2.2:
Sustainable development activities and principles are integrated in the Department’s management and accountability structure.
  • Integrate sustainable development into Departmental business planning
  • Increase the understanding of SD and its relevance to the work of the Department within its managerial community
  • Develop specific targets for inclusion and monitoring of sustainable development commitments into selective senior managers’ performance agreements.

Objective 3: Improve the environmental sustainability of the Department’s physical operations.


OBJECTIVES/TARGETS COMMITMENTS
Target 3.1:
Conservation and waste-management practices are significantly improved.
  • Intensify activities to raise staff awareness of conservation practices
  • Implementing default double-sided printing
  • Introduce battery recovery program
  • Adherence to Government of Canada accommodation standards
  • On-going transfer of select IT assets to the Computer-for-Schools program
  • Enforcement of water policy which supports tap water over bottled water
  • Introduce and encourage measures to reduce energy consumption
Target 3.2:
Government Green Procurement Policy is implemented.
  • On-going training of all appropriate managers and staff to be maintained
  • Implementation of GPP is monitored and enforced
  • IT investment criteria to consider environmental benefits/costs



Horizontal Initiatives

Name of Horizontal Initiative: National Anti-drug Strategy

Name of lead department(s): Department of Justice

Lead department program activity: Justice policies, laws and programs

Start date of the Horizontal Initiative: 2007-08

End date of the Horizontal Initiative: 2011-12 and ongoing

Total federal funding allocation (start to end date): $578.1 millions[1]

Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement):

The National Anti-Drug Strategy is built on the former Canada’s Drug Strategy, with a clear focus on illicit drugs and a particular emphasis on youth. Its goal is to contribute to safer and healthier communities through coordinated efforts to prevent use, treat dependency and reduce production and distribution of illicit drugs. It encompasses three action plans: prevention, treatment and enforcement.

 The prevention action plan supports efforts to prevent youth from using illicit drugs by enhancing their awareness and understanding of the harmful social and health effects of illicit drug use and to develop and implement community-based interventions & initiatives to prevent illicit drug use. The treatment action plan supports effective treatment and rehabilitation systems and services by developing and implementing innovative and collaborative approaches. The enforcement action plan aims to contribute to the disruption of illicit drug operations in a safe manner, particularly targeting criminal organizations.

Shared outcome(s):

  • Reduced demand for illicit drugs in targeted populations and areas;
  • Reduced impacts of illicit drug use through prevention and treatment efforts; and
  • Reduced supply of illicit drugs.

Governance structure(s):

The governance structure of the Strategy consists of an Assistant Deputy Minister Steering Committee and working groups on policy and performance, prevention and treatment, enforcement, and communications. The governance structure is supported by the Strategic Initiative Unit of the Department of Justice Canada.

The Assistant Deputy Minister Steering Committee (ADMSC), which is chaired by the Department of Justice Canada, oversees the implementation of the Strategy, making decisions necessary to advance the initiative, where required, and ensuring appropriate and timely outcomes for the initiative and accountability in the expenditure of initiative resources.  The ADMSC prepares questions for the consideration of Deputy Ministers, where appropriate.

The Prevention and Treatment Working Group, chaired by Health Canada, oversees the development and implementation of the Prevention and Treatment Action Plans. The Enforcement Working Group, chaired by the Department of Public Safety Canada, oversees the development and implementation of the Enforcement Action Plan. The Policy and Performance Working Group, chaired by the Department of Justice Canada, oversees the development and articulation of policy directions and outcomes for the Strategy and the work of the Sub-Committee on Evaluation and Reporting. The communications Working Group, chaired by the Department of Justice Canada, oversees communication of the Strategy including, making decisions necessary to advance communication of the initiative and ensuring coordination of communication.


($ millions)
Federal Partners Federal Partner Program Activity (PA) Names of Programs for Federal Partners Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) Planned Spending for
2009-10
Expected Results for
2009-10
Department of Justice A1 - Justice policies, laws and programs a. Drug Treatment Courts $16.23M $3.63M Reduced drug substances relapse among drug treatment court clients.
b. Youth Justice Fund - Youth Justice Anti-drug Treatment Component

(Treatment Action Plan)
$6.8M $1.58M Overall results:
  • To work collaboratively with interested provinces and territories as well as other stakeholders in order to identify gaps in drug treatment programs for youth in the justice system.
  • To introduce, pilot and evaluate a number of drug treatment options for youth involved in the youth justice system in communities.
  • To share knowledge of the piloted drug treatment programs and promising practices with provinces and territories as well as other interested stakeholders.

Immediate Outcomes:

  • Projects on Treatment Services & Program Enhancements
  • Enhanced capacity to plan/ deliver a range of treatment services & programs to targeted populations
c. Justice Canada Lead Role for the National Anti-Drug Strategy $1.34M $0.25M Effective leadership of the federal response to concerns around illicit drug prevention, treatment and enforcement through:
  • exercising overarching responsibility for policy and coordination;
  • maintaining the NADS Governance Structure;
C1 - Internal Services a. Justice Canada Lead Role for the National Anti-Drug Strategy $1.53M $0.33M Effective leadership of the federal response to concerns around illicit drug prevention, treatment and enforcement through:
  • leading and coordinating all NADS communi-cations activities;
  • taking lead responsibility for accountability – evaluation and performance reporting.
b. National Anti-drug Strategy $0.25M $0.05M  
Health Canada N/A a. Mass Media Campaign

(Prevention Action Plan)

$29.8M $6M Increased awareness & understanding of illicit drugs & their negative consequences
3.4.3 Controlled Substances b. Drug Strategy Community Initiatives Fund (DSCIF)

(Prevention Action Plan)

$59.0M $11.8M Increased awareness & understanding of illicit drugs & their negative consequences

Enhanced uptake of knowledge in communities to address illicit drug use & its negative consequences

3.4 Substance Use and Abuse c. Drug Treatment Funding Program (DTFP)

(Treatment Action Plan)

$124.7 M $30.77M Improved collaboration on responses & knowledge of treatment issues

Enhanced capacity to plan/ deliver a range of treatment services & programs to targeted populations

Enhanced F/PT commitments to improve treatment systems in targeted areas of need

4.1.1.2 First Nations and Inuit Mental Health and Addictions d. National Native Alcohol and Drug Abuse Program (NNADAP)

(Treatment Action Plan)

$36 M $7.9M Enhanced capacity to plan/ deliver a range of treatment services & programs to targeted populations
3.4.3 Controlled Substances e. Office of Controlled Substances

(Enforcement Action Plan)

$12.8 M $2.66M Increased capacity to control & monitor controlled substances & precursor chemicals
f. Drug Analysis Services

(Enforcement Action Plan)

$ 49.2 M[2]

$ 3.4 M[3]

$9.44M Increased capacity to gather, analyze/share intelligence & analyse evidence

Increased awareness of illicit drug & precursor chemical issues for enforcement officials

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 1.2 Strategic Priority Research Research on Drug Treatment Model

(Treatment Action Plan)

$4.0M $0.97M Improved collaboration on responses & knowledge of treatment issues
Department of Public Safety Canada 5 a. Crime Prevention Funding and Programming:  (Crime Prevention Action Fund & Research and Knowledge Development Fund)

(Prevention Action Plan)

$20.0M $5.0M Enhanced support for targeted at-risk populations.

Enhanced knowledge in communities to address illicit drug use and its negative consequences.

3.1 Law enforcement policy b. National Coordination of Efforts to Improve Intelligence, Knowledge, Management, Research, Evaluation

 (Enforcement Action Plan)

$4.0M $0.8M Safer communities and more effective policing through strategic national law enforcement policies
Royal Canadian Mounted Police 1.1.2.7 a. Drugs and Organized Crime Awareness Service (DOCAS)

(Prevention Action Plan)

$15.1M $3M Increased awareness & understanding of illicit drugs & their negative consequences by youth targeted through DOCAS programming.
3.5.2 Community and Youth Programs b. National Youth Intervention and Diversion Program

(Treatment Action Plan)

$3.6M $0.745M Implementation sites underway in participating RCMP Divisions.

RCMP Divisional representatives selected to assist in local program delivery and data collection.

1.1.2.9 c. The RCMP Drug Enforcement Program

(Enforcement Action Plan)

$91.4 M $17.3M Increased capacity for the enforcement of illicit drug producers & distributors, in particular, through the dismantling of marihuana and synthetic drug operations.

Increased capacity to gather, analyze and/or share intelligence & analyse evidence, through additional resources in Criminal Intelligence.

Change in the level of MGO or Clan Labs investigated and/or disrupted.

Continue to maintain the integration, collaboration and capacity between sectors, law enforcement agencies, governments, communities and international partners to address the illicit importation and/or exportation, production and distribution related to MGOs or SDOs.

Increase awareness of illicit drug & precursor chemical issues among enforcement officials and first responders.

Correctional Service Canada 3.0 Community Supervision Case Preparation and Supervision
of Provincial Offenders

(Enforcement Action Plan)

$23.3 M [4] $6.8M Timely case preparation; rate of
offenders successfully reintegrated into the community

(if legislation regarding mandatory minimum penalties for serious drug offenders is passed)

National Parole Board of Canada   Conditional Release

(Enforcement Action Plan)

$7.2 M [5] $2.2M Preparation for implementation of Mandatory Minimum Penalties for serious drug offences.

Following Royal Assent for Mandatory Minimum Penalties for serious drug offences, completion of conditional release reviews for those offenders incarcerated for offences subject to the Mandatory Minimum Penalties.

Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions 1 - Drug, Criminal Code and Terrorism Prosecution Program a. Prosecution and prosecution -related services

(Enforcement Action Plan)

$8.6M $1.6M Provision of pre-charge legal advice and litigation support, as well as prosecution of drug offences under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA) in response to the workload generated by the enhanced RCMP dedicated anti-drug teams and criminal intelligence and technical operations support staff.
b. Prosecution of serious drug offences under the CDSA

(Enforcement Action Plan)

$33.5 M [6] $0 Provision of prosecution-related advice and litigation support during police investigations, and prosecution of drug charges under the CDSA resulting from the Minimum Mandatory Penalties, subject to the proposed legislation receiving Royal Assent.
3 - Internal Services Enforcement Action Plan $1.3M $0.2 M  
Canada Border Services Agency 1 Border Intelligence, Precursor Chemical Diversion, Analysis and Scientific Services

(Enforcement Action Plan)

$12.7M $2.35M The resources will be focused on intelligence gathering, information sharing, enforcement activities, assessment capabilities and laboratory support and services.
Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade 1.2 International Operations and Programs Annual Contributions to UNODC and CICAD

(Enforcement Action Plan)

$4.5M $0.9M Improved capacity of UNODC to fulfill its mandate in the fight against drugs and international crime at the global level.

Improved capacity of CICAD to fulfill its mandate in the fight against drugs in the Americas.

Canada Revenue Agency 4 Reporting Compliance Special Enforcement Program

(Enforcement Action Plan)

$4.2 M $0.8M 15 audits of targets involved in marijuana grow operations or illicit drugs generating approximately

$750,000 in federal tax

Public Works and Government Services Canada 1.7 Specialized Programs and Services Forensic Accounting Management Group (FAMG)

(Enforcement Action Plan)

$1.6 M $0.2M To remove financial incentive for engaging in criminal activity
Financial Transactions and analysis Centre of Canada 4881

Collection, Analysis and Dissemination of Financial Information

Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada

(Enforcement Action Plan)

$2.5 M $512,000 Enhanced support to Law enforcement

Development of financial intelligence

Ensuring compliance in high-risk reporting sectors
Total $573 M $117.8M  

Results to be achieved by non-federal partners (if applicable): N/A

Contact information:

Catherine Latimer 
General Counsel and Director General
Strategic Initiative Unit
(613) 957-9623

clatimer@justice.gc.ca

[1] It includes funding to implement MMPs for serious drug offences, which is held in a frozen allotment, to be released subject to the proposed legislation receiving Royal Assent.

[2] Original allocation as per RMAF is $62.4M. Variance is a result of internal reallocation to support DAS activities (research, policy, regulatory development).

[3] This funding to implement MMPs for serious drug offences is held in a frozen allotment, to be released subject to the proposed legislation receiving Royal Assent.

[4] This funding to implement MMPs for serious drug offences is held in a frozen allotment, to be released subject to the proposed legislation receiving Royal Assent. No funding was available for 2007/08.

[5] This funding to implement MMPs for serious drug offences is held in a frozen allotment, to be released subject to the proposed legislation receiving Royal Assent.

[6] This funding to implement MMPs for serious drug offences is held in a frozen allotment, to be released subject to the proposed legislation receiving Royal Assent.



Upcoming Internal Audits (Next three fiscal years)



Name of Internal Audit Internal Audit Type Status Expected Completion Date
Public Law Sector Audit In-progress March 2009
ATIP Audit In-progress March 2009
SMS Audit In-progress March 2009
CIDA LSU Audit In-progress March 2009
DFAIT LSU Audit In-progress March 2009
Contribution Auditing Audit In-progress March 2009
Cost Recovery (Framework) Audit In-progress March 2009
RDIMS Audit In-progress March 2009
Immigration Law Regional Offices Audit Planned October 2009
Barrister's Briefcase Audit In-progress February 2009
National Defence LSU Audit Planned January 2010
Natural Resources Canada LSU Audit Planned January 2010
PSC LSU Audit Planned January 2010
Treasury Board LSU Audit Planned January 2010
Tax Law Services (Ottawa & Edmonton) Audit Planned March 2010
Regulatory Law (Ontario & Quebec) Audit Planned March 2010
Budgetary Forecasting & Allocation Audit Planned January 2010
PeopleSoft Audit Planned January 2010
Canada Border Services Agency LSU Audit Planned January 2011
Industry Canada LSU Audit Planned January 2011
Tax Law Services (Toronto & Montreal) Audit Planned March 2011
PAYE/RAYE Process Audit Planned January 2011
Contracting (Regional Offices) Audit Planned March 2011
Legal Agent Account Verification Process (Civil) Audit Planned March 2011
Values & Ethics Audit Planned January 2011
Cost Recovery (Transactions) Audit Planned March 2011
Resourcing (Staffing) Audit Planned January 2011
Professional Development Audit Planned March 2011
Compensation & Labour Relations Audit Planned January 2011
Canadian Food Inspection Agency LSU Audit Planned January 2012
Canadian Heritage/Parks Canada LSU Audit Planned January 2012
Official Languages Audit Planned March 2012
Technology Services Audit Planned March 2012
Business & Regulatory Law (BC RO) Audit Planned March 2012
Corporate Secretariat Audit Planned March 2012
Inventory Mgt System (Basset Pro) Audit Planned January 2012
Contracting (HQ) Audit Planned March 2011
Business Continuity PlanningBusiness Continuity Planning Audit Planned January 2012

Electronic Link to Index of Completed Internal Audits: http://www.justice.gc.ca/en/dept/pub/audit_reports/index.html



Upcoming Evaluations (Next three fiscal years)



Name of Evaluation Program Type Status Expected Completion Date
Aboriginal Justice Strategy Transfer payment Complete Formative Evaluation

Planned Summative Evaluation

2009-2010

2011-2012

Youth Justice Initiative Transfer payment Planned Summative Evaluation of the Youth Justice Fund,

Youth Justice Services Funding Program and Intensive Rehabilitation and Custody Supervision (IRCS)

2009-2010
Federal Victims Strategy Transfer payment Planned Summative Evaluation 2010-2011
Canada’s Action Plan against Racism Transfer payment Planned Interdepartmental Summative Evaluation 2009-2010
Contraventions Act Fund Transfer payment Planned Formative Evaluation

Planned Summative Evaluation

2010-2011

2012-2013

Access to Justice in Both Official Languages Transfer payment Planned Summative Evaluation 2012-2013
Justice Partnership & Innovation Program (JPIP) Transfer payment Planned Summative Evaluation 2010-2011
Aboriginal Courtwork Program Transfer payment Planned Summative Evaluation 2012-2013
Unified Family Court (UFC) Joint FPT initiative (PTs create / administer the UFC structure, and the Federal Government appoints and pays the judges of these courts). Complete Summative Evaluation 2009-2010
Family Violence Initiative Transfer payment Complete Interdepartmental Evaluation 2009-2010
Office for Integrity and Conflict Management in the Workplace Government operations Planned Formative Evaluation

Planned Summative Evaluation

2009-2010

2011-2012

Federal Elder Abuse Initiative Transfer payment Planned Interdepartmental Evaluation 2010-2011
Legal Excellence Government operations Complete Evaluation 2009-2010
Legal Aid Program Transfer payment Planned Summative Evaluation 2011-2012
National Anti-Drug Strategy (NADS) Government operations and Transfer payment Complete NADS Interdepartmental Implementation Evaluation

Planned NADS Interdepartmental Impact Evaluation

2009-2010

2011-2012

Security Certificates Transfer payment Planned Interdepartmental Evaluation 2009-2010
Integrated Market Enforcement Teams (IMETs) Transfer payment Planned Interdepartmental Summative Evaluation 2009-2010
Justice Policies, Laws and Programs (planning for full evaluation coverage) Government operations Planned Evaluation(s) 2011-2012
Legal Services to Government (planning for full evaluation coverage) Government operations Planned Evaluation(s) 2011-2012

Electronic Link Evaluation Plan: http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/pi/eval/index.html



Sources of Respendable and Non-Respendable Revenue



Respendable Revenue
($ millions)
Program Activity Respendable revenue Forecast Revenue
2008-09
Planned Revenue
2009-10
Planned Revenue
2010-11
Planned Revenue
2011-12
B.1 Services to government Cost recoverable legal services to departments 191.4 205.0 205.0 205.0
Subtotal 191.4 205.0 205.0 205.0
           
Total Respendable Revenue 191.4 205.0 205.0 205.0



Non-Respendable Revenue
($ millions)
Program Activity Non-respendable revenue Forecast Revenue
2008-09
Planned Revenue
2009-10
Planned Revenue
2010-11
Planned Revenue
2011-12
A.1 Justice policies, laws and programs Family Order and Agreements Enforcement Assistance Program 7.0 7.2 7.2 7.2
Central Registry of Divorce Proceedings 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
Miscellaneous Revenues 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Subtotal 7.8 8.0 8.0 8.0
B.1 Services to government EBP - Legal Services 32.2 34.4 34.4 34.4
Court costs 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9
Central Registry of Divorce Proceedings 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Miscellaneous Revenues 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5
Total Non-respendable Revenue 41.2 43.6 43.7 43.9
Total Respendable and Non-respendable Revenue 232.6 248.6 248.7 248.9

Note 1: EBP portion (20%) for legal services is deemed non-respendable since it is appropriated in the Main Estimates