Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
www.tbs-sct.gc.ca
Breadcrumb Trail
Home
> Chief Information Officer Branch
> IT Project Review and Oversight
> Enhanced Management Framework
Institutional links
Versions
ARCHIVED - Management of Large Public IT Projects - Canada
This page has been archived.
Archived Content
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
They are presented roughly in chronological order as they apply during the life of an
IT project.
Business alignment
- The alignment of the objectives of a project with business goals should be expressed in
the form of a business case, which supports the investment decision. The business case
puts the investment decision in a strategic context. It provides the information necessary
to make a decision about whether a project should proceed. It provides an analysis of all
the costs, benefits and risks associated with a proposed investment, and with the
reasonable alternatives to the proposed investment.
Senior management commitment and involvement
- Involvement and commitment of senior program/business management to a large IT
initiative at an early stage is essential;
- A "project sponsor" should be identified, who is typically a senior official
responsible for the business function the project will support. An effective project
sponsor ensures that the organization understands the value and importance of the project,
and is ultimately responsible for realising the expected benefits of the project.
- Solid senior management support is demonstrated through the provision of adequate
financial and human resources, and active participation in project governance.
Project governance
- Project governance should reflect the complexity of the challenge, and change as the
project commences. Typically it will start with a senior management committee. From then
on governance should shift structure and focus to meet the program's evolving needs,
from consultation, inclusiveness and dialogue, to the practicalities of implementation.
Project Management Office (PMO)
- The creation and use of a Project Management Office (PMO) significantly improves chances
of success in the project endeavour. The PMO's role is to facilitate co-ordinate and
monitor on-going activities.
- A central PMO in an organization can manage portfolios of projects, provide effective
project oversight, and act as a source of expertise and support to individual projects.
Project planning
- A Project Charter should be the first step in project planning, once the business case
has been developed and the investment decision taken. The Project Charter is an agreement
between the technical groups providing the product or service, and the business
organization requesting and receiving the project deliverable.
- The Project Charter is a tool to obtain commitment from all affected groups and
individuals within a specific project, and also a communication vehicle that can be
referenced throughout the project. It acts as a quick reference and overview of what the
project is about, why it is being conducted, who is involved and in what capacity, and the
general approach and timeline that exists for the project.
- Project planning should include top down and bottom up schedule and cost estimation,
based on a detailed work breakdown structure. Detailed project planning will provide clear
definition and documentation of the project. It will encompass management structures,
monitoring mechanisms, comprehensive and timely procurement plans, logistics and
communications planning.
- Careful scope planning, analysis and resolution are necessary to meet project schedules
and deliver cost-beneficial user functionality while avoiding "scope creep".
Project resources
- The responsibility for day-to-day management of a project can effectively be shared
between in-house and contracted resources. Core project management responsibilities and
functions should not be outsourced. An internal manager provides essential knowledge about
the organization, its key players and management processes, program functions and
requirements, while outside consultants offer technical and functional expertise in
developing and implementing systems.
- To be successful a project requires adequate resources of funding, trained staff and
facilities available as identified in the project schedule. This requires considerable
attention to resource acquisition and planning early in the project life.
- The right mix of resources will involve program and information systems staff. The team
should ideally include experienced and knowledgeable departmental staff from both the
program and systems disciplines. If outside technical resources are needed, they should be
used strategically to supplement staff skills. A requirement for technology transfer from
contractors to in-house staff should be agreed from the start.
- Including systems management, design and architecture staff very early in the analysis
of business processes and development of user requirements gives them a better
understanding of business needs.
Risk management approach
- A risk-based process has been found very effective for determining departmental
priorities and identifying mission critical functions.
- The chances of project success are measurably improved if risk management techniques are
performed on a continuous basis throughout the project. Formal risk assessments at key
points during the development life cycle can identify potential problem areas and suggest
corrective action to be taken before the problems occur.
- Risk management for a project can start at the business case stage, with a review of the
options for achieving the required business objective, including an assessment of the
risks associated with each option.
- A risk assessment performed early in the development process can identify exposures
against which contingency plans can be prepared, including "off-ramps" and
alternative delivery strategies.
Phased approach
- The recommended approach to the implementation of long-term information technology
strategies is through small, manageable components, each of which provides an improved
capability (efficiency and/or effectiveness) to the organization. Such an approach
provides certain key benefits:
- it is easier to define requirements more clearly for a smaller component;
- requirements are less likely to be affected by changes in business environment;
- more complete and accurate estimates of costs and schedules can be developed;
- it is easier to obtain project resources with appropriate levels of experience.
- Systems development should be done in well-scoped phases. The use of Function Point
Analysis can eliminate guesswork in managing the scope of work that can reasonably be
completed within the established time frame.
- Careful selection of achievable objectives for each phase, with diligent adherence to
these objectives, keeps the development package stable; scope creep can be minimized.
Co-location
- Wherever possible, all project staff should be co-located to ensure rapid and accurate
communication and information exchange. This includes program and information systems
staff, in-house and consultant resources.
Involvement of users
- Project management and communications should involve functional and end users from as
early as possible. Close consultation with client groups and representatives helps build
ownership and commitment. Extensive user participation in systems development and testing
is essential for a viable end product.
Performance measurement and reporting
- Achievement of project deliverables and schedules should be measured by a precise,
pre-defined, and regular monitoring and reporting process. This should be established at
the earliest possible stage in project start-up.
- Open and visible tabling of project status information at senior management committees
on a regular basis focuses everyone's attention, and ensures continued management
support.
Scope management
- A formal change management process, together with effective quality assurance and
control of deliverables and documentation at all stages of a project can help avoid
"scope creep".
- Involvement of business and user staff, leading to a thorough understanding of the links
between project quality, schedule and cost, can also reduce pressures to expand the scope
of a project. Careful selection of achievable objectives for each phase, agreed to by all
parties, with diligent adherence to these objectives, enables a stable development
environment to be maintained.
Communications and training
- Establish appropriate logs to document and communicate decisions, changes, issues and
problems etc. to all project team members.
- IT initiatives must recognize their potential impact on people and their jobs. A
comprehensive strategy for managing change should be part of project planning. This will
include targeted communications, training and user support plans.
- All opportunities and possible vehicles for communicating, both internally and
externally, must be utilised in prepare the user community and other stakeholders for
change. Ideally the project team should include one or more communications specialists.
- Project planning should reflect the need for effective and appropriately timed education
and training for users, and technical training for technical and support staff. All means
of training should be investigated as appropriate, including computer-based or internet
"distance education" where staff are geographically dispersed, for reduced costs
and greater flexibility.
Independent reviews
The use of independent reviews at key stages of a project's life cycle can provide
an extremely valuable snapshot of the "health" of the initiative. Experienced
but independent observers with no stake in the project can identify issues that need to be
addressed, but which might not be visible to project staff in the heat of the action.