ARCHIVED - Transport Canada - Supplementary Tables

User Fee: Aviation Safety Regulatory Fees

Fee Type: Regulatory Service

Fee-setting Authority:

Aeronautics Act
Canadian Aviation Regulations (CARs) — CARs fees
Fees in Part I, subpart 4

Date Last Modified: July 15, 2000
Subsequent amendments to regulations and/or fee reductions, if any, did not trigger the User Fees Act.

Performance Standards:

Civil Aviation’s Service Standards
Service Charter

Performance Results:

• Available for Ontario Region: results for Services with Fees
• Other performance results are under development; implementation is being phased in. Training has been completed in the Ontario and Atlantic regions. The Atlantic Region formally began using the performance tracking system in April 2011. Plans for implementation in two other regions in 2011-2012 include the Prairie and Northern Region, and the Pacific Region

2010-11 ($ thousands)			Planning Years ($ thousands)
Forecast Revenue	Actual Revenue	Full Cost	Fiscal Year	Forecast Revenue	Estimated Full Cost
8,158	7,613	69,046	2011-12	8,138	61,687
			2012-13	8,133	61,019
			2013-14	8,133	61,046

Other Information:

Documentation on service standards was published in April 2010. A communication strategy has been activated to raise awareness among stakeholders and Transport Canada Civil Aviation employees.

A complaint mechanism has been developed and implemented for service standards related to the Canadian Aviation Regulations CAR 104 Charges (i.e., Civil Aviation Issues Reporting System [CAIRS]).

As of 2010-2011, revised costing and reporting approaches were developed as a result of more detailed financial information available within Civil Aviation. The new reporting Program Activity Architecture that was introduced in 2009-2010 allows a further segregation of costs, including those related to CARS user charges. In prior years, Full Civil Aviation Costs were reported due to insufficient validation of the 1999 percentage (27.4 percent) to establish costs of services related to CARS user charges.

Consistent with public consultations conducted in the past, full or partial costs of services such as monitoring compliance, enforcing safety operational standards, establishing legislation, regulations and standards, etc., were considered to benefit the general taxpayer. Only the costs associated with issuing Transport Canada safety documents (certificate, licence, permit, etc.) were considered a private benefit attributable to the document recipient.

User Fee: Marine Safety Regulatory Fees (inspections, surveys, services, etc.)

Fee Type: Regulatory Service

Fee-setting Authority:

• Canada Shipping Act, 2001
• Various regulations such as the Board of Steamship Inspection Scale of Fees; Vessels Registry Fees Tariff; etc.

Date Last Modified: May 1, 2002
Subsequent amendments to regulations and/or fee reductions did not trigger the User Fees Act.

Performance Standards: Service Standards for Marine Safety’s Fees

Performance Results:

• Large Ship Registry Tariff: Performance results are available for the Vessels Registry Fees Tariff and measures are being taken to post them on the Transport Canada (Marine Safety) website. Performance for each of the 10 large vessel standards is over 90 percent.
• Other performance results are under development: Work continued to advance in 2010-2011 with regard to establishing electronic tracking for service standard performance. Marine Safety program has 32 information technology (IT) systems/databases that manage program data, and a number of them require modifications to integrate service management data. A new IT framework, which will provide a common technical platform and the capability to share data among systems, will facilitate this effort. Further, a working group was established to review existing service standards with a view to improving their measurability. Proposals have been developed and will be presented to the Marine Safety Executive in the fall of 2011. Public consultations will follow as appropriate.

2010-11 ($ thousands)			Planning Years ($ thousands)
Forecast Revenue	Actual Revenue	Full Cost	Fiscal Year	Forecast Revenue	Estimated Full Cost
7,325	7,129	81,056	2011-12	7,088	74,533
			2012-13	6,987	72,430
			2013-14	6,889	72,302

Other Information:

A complaint mechanism policy, "Handling of complaints related to Marine Safety User Fees and applicable service standards," is available on Transport Canada’s website.

As of 2010-2011, revised costing and reporting approaches were developed as a result of more specific financial information available within Marine Safety as a result of the new reporting Program Activity Architecture introduced in 2009-2010 that allowed a further segregation of costs related to the Marine Safety Regulatory Fees.

Consistent with public consultations conducted in the past, full or partial costs of services such as monitoring compliance, enforcing safety operational standards, establishing legislation, regulations and standards, pollution prevention, etc. were considered to benefit the general taxpayer.

User Fee: Marine Safety — Ship Radio Inspection Program

Fee Type: Regulatory Service

Fee-setting Authority:

• Canada Shipping Act, 2001
• Ship Radio Inspection Fees Regulations

Date Last Modified: 1978
Subsequent amendments to regulations and/or fee reductions did not trigger the User Fees Act.

Performance Standards: Consistent with the Fisheries and Oceans Canada publication, Part IV of Radio Aids to Marine Navigation, a ship radio inspection service will be provided within three working days following a request from a client.

Performance Results: Radio inspection services are provided more than 90 percent of the time within three working days following such a request. As some clients’ ships operate on a fixed schedule, such a request may be made a week or more in advance of the requested inspection date.

2010-11 ($ thousands)			Planning Years ($ thousands)
Forecast Revenue	Actual Revenue	Full Cost	Fiscal Year	Forecast Revenue	Estimated Full Cost
48	83	970	2011-12	48	970
			2012-13	48	970
			2013-14	48	970

Other Information:

A complaint mechanism policy, "Handling of complaints related to Marine Safety User Fees and applicable service standards," is available on Transport Canada’s website.

Funding of the Ship Radio Inspection Program is covered by a memorandum of understanding between Transport Canada, and Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Revenues from user fees represent the full cost recovery of overtime and travel costs. Full Costs include also the costs for the program manager, a share of internal services costs and amortization costs of the ship radio inspection equipment.

User Fee: Airport Fees — Air Services Charges Regulations

(General Terminal Fees, Landing Fees, Aircraft Parking Charges, Emergency Response Services Charges)

Fee Type: Other Products and Services

Fee-setting Authority:

• Paragraph 4.4(2) of the Aeronautics Act
• Section 2 of the Ministerial Regulations Authorization Order — Air Services Charges Regulations

Date Last Modified: January 1, 2003
Subsequent amendments to regulations and/or fee reductions, if any, did not trigger the User Fees Act.

Performance Standards: Airports National Service Standards are available on the Transport Canada website.

Performance Results: Performance met the standards more than 90 percent of the time. Refer to Airports Performance Measurements for 2010-2011

2010-11 ($ thousands)			Planning Years ($ thousands)
Forecast Revenue	Actual Revenue	Full Cost	Fiscal Year	Forecast Revenue	Estimated Full Cost
5,246	5,352	15,869	2011-12	5,359	12,568
			2012-13	5,400	12,568
			2013-14	5,450	12,568

Other Information:

Data exclude revenues and costs from divested and leased airports. Consistent with public consultations conducted in the past, Full Costs reported do not reflect annualized capital costs ($2 million) in recognition of the fact that smaller airports may not have the necessary critical mass of traffic to fully pay for these large up-front infrastructure costs, i.e., start-up costs.

A complaint mechanism has been implemented through feedback and, more specific procedures within each standard, on the Transport Canada website for service standards related to airports operated by Transport Canada or on its behalf.

User Fee: Airport Fees — Annual Registration of Mobile Equipment

Fee Type: Other Products and Services

Fee-setting Authority:

• Government Property Traffic Act
• Airport Traffic Regulations — Part III, section 57 to 60

Date Last Modified: February 24, 2004
Subsequent amendments to regulations and/or fee reductions, if any, did not trigger the User Fees Act.

Performance Standards: Airports National Service Standards are available on the Transport Canada website.

Performance Results: Performance met the standards more than 90 percent of the time. Refer to Airports Performance Measurements for 2010-2011

2010-11 ($ thousands)			Planning Years ($ thousands)
Forecast Revenue	Actual Revenue	Full Cost	Fiscal Year	Forecast Revenue	Estimated Full Cost
1	0.2	0.6	2011-12	0.2	0.6
			2012-13	0.2	0.6
			2013-14	0.2	0.6

Other Information:

A complaint mechanism has been implemented through feedback and, more specific procedures within each standard, on the Transport Canada website for service standards related to airports operated by Transport Canada or on its behalf and are also built as part of each service standard.

User Fee: Airport Vehicle Parking Charges

Fee Type: Other Products and Services

Fee-setting Authority:

• paragraph 4.4(2) of the Aeronautics Act
• section 2 of the Ministerial Regulations Authorization Order, Airport Vehicle Parking Charges Regulations

Date Last Modified: November 19, 1998
Subsequent amendments to regulations and/or fee reductions, if any, did not trigger the User Fees Act.

Performance Standards: Airports National Service Standards are available on the Transport Canada website.

Performance Results: Performance met the standards more than 90 percent of the time. Refer to Airports Performance Measurements for 2010-2011

2010-11 ($ thousands)			Planning Years ($ thousands)
Forecast Revenue	Actual Revenue	Full Cost	Fiscal Year	Forecast Revenue	Estimated Full Cost
275	370	1,628	2011-12	267	1,289
			2012-13	274	1,289
			2013-14	281	1,289

Other Information:

Data exclude revenues and costs from divested and leased airports. Consistent with public consultations conducted in the past, Full Costs reported do not reflect annualized capital costs in recognition of the fact that smaller airports may not have the necessary critical mass of traffic to fully pay for up-front infrastructure costs, i.e., start-up costs.

A complaint mechanism has been implemented through feedback and, more specific procedures within each standard, on the Transport Canada website for service standards related to airports operated by Transport Canada or on its behalf and are also built as part of each service standard.

User Fee: Public Port Fees (Wharfage & Transfers, Berthage, Storage, Harbour Dues, Utilities and Other Services)

Fee Type: Other Products and Services

Fee-setting Authority:

Canada Marine Act
Public Port Fees

Date Last Modified: January 1, 2004

Performance Standards: Public Ports and Public Port Facilities National Service Standards are posted on Transport Canada’s website

Performance Results: Performance met the standards more than 90 percent of the time. Refer to Public Port and Public Port Facilities Performance Measurements for 2010-2011.

2010-11 ($ thousands)			Planning Years ($ thousands)
Forecast Revenue	Actual Revenue	Full Cost	Fiscal Year	Forecast Revenue	Estimated Full Cost
7,659	8,238	33,603	2011-12	8,065	27,336
			2012-13	8,149	27,100
			2013-14	8,171	27,344

Other Information:

A complaint mechanism has been implemented through feedback on Transport Canada’s website for service standards related to public ports and public port facilities. Other dispute mechanisms are in place and built into each service standard.

User Fee: Access to Information Requests — Fees

Fee Type: Other Products and Services

Fee-setting Authority: Access to Information Act and related regulations

Date Last Modified: 1992
Subsequent amendments to the Act and regulations did not trigger the User Fees Act.

Performance Standards: Service Standards are included in the Access to information Act, section 7. Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request; the response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the act. Notice of extension is to be sent within 30 days after receipt of request.

Performance Results: Statutory deadlines have been met for 40 percent of requests. One hundred percent of extension notices were sent within 30 days following the receipt of the request. One hundred percent of transfer notices were sent within 15 days.

2010-11 ($ thousands)			Planning Years ($ thousands)
Forecast Revenue	Actual Revenue	Full Cost	Fiscal Year	Forecast Revenue	Estimated Full Cost
5	7	2,516	2011-12	5	2,455
			2012-13	5	2,455
			2013-14	5	2,455

Other Information:

The Access to Information Act has provisions to waive fees where the total owing per request amounts to less than $25.00, or when the request has not been answered within the legislated time frames and additional costs would apply, or where there is a public interest in the disclosure.

The complaint mechanism is described under section 30 of the Act.

Cost information is based on the Statistical Reports on the Access to Information Act. User Fee financial information includes adjustments to a full cost base in accordance with the Treasury Board Secretariat’s Guide to Costing.

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Transportation Infrastructure Fund

Start Date: October 20, 2006

End Date: March 31, 2014

Description: The Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Transportation Infrastructure Fund is intended to establish the best transportation network, facilitating global supply chains between Asia and North America. The transportation infrastructure investments address near-term capacity problems and build strategically for the future.

Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system

Results Achieved:

Asia-Pacific Gateway Corridor and Initiative Investments Map

Significant progress has been made over the past year, including the following:

• Six projects were completed:
  • Pitt River Bridge and Mary Hill Interchange;
  • Highway 97 — Wright Station Curves;
  • River Road Improvements — Foley Crescent to CN Fraser River Bridge;
  • Derwent Way left turn lanes;
  • Chester Road Centre left turn lane; and
  • Rail Barge Ramp.
• Two contribution agreements were signed:
  • Port Metro Vancouver; and
  • Corporation of Delta 80th Street.
• Four projects began construction:
  • RBRC #3 152nd Street Overpass;
  • RBRC #8 80th St. Overpass;
  • NSTA : Brooksbank Avenue Underpass; and
  • the CentrePort Canada Way Project.

Transport Canada has conducted research on industry best practices in the innovation and development of reliability indicators and performance metrics. These indicators are intended to measure the reliability of transit times for containers originating from Asian ports through Asia-Pacific Gateway ports. The indicators will quantify Canada’s international trade supply chain performance and will provide the starting point for targeting bottlenecks.

Program Activity: Gateways and Corridors
($ millions)

	2008-09 Actual Spending	2009-10 Actual Spending	2010-11 Planned Spending	2010-11 Total Authorities	2010-11 Actual Spending	Variance(s)
Total Grants	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Total Contributions	$56.6	$73.6	$241.9	$220.0	$122.3	$119.67
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Total Program Activity(ies)	$56.6	$73.6	$241.9	$220.0	$122.3	$119.67

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The variance under the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Transportation Infrastructure Fund program resulted from delays in project design, approval the start of construction and finalizing the contribution agreements; the need to secure additional funding partners; and, finally, the need to undertake due diligence.

Audit Completed or Planned: Not at the present time

Evaluation Completed or Planned: Transport Canada’s Departmental Evaluation Services will complete an evaluation of the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Transportation Infrastructure Fund in 2013-2014. The evaluation will examine a number of issues to determine the relevance, success and cost-effectiveness of the program.

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Gateways and Border Crossings Fund

Start Date: February 7, 2008

End Date: March 31, 2014

Description: The Gateways and Border Crossings Fund is a merit-based program that funds transportation infrastructure and other related initiatives to develop and exploit Canada’s strategic gateways, trade corridors and border crossings, and to better integrate the national transportation system.

Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system

Results Achieved: The majority of the $2.1 billion fund has been committed to projects in each of Canada’s gateways. Recent commitments have included investments in core National Highway System infrastructure, strategic border crossings, as well as major ports and airports. These projects are intended to enhance the flow of people and goods between Canada and the rest of the world by improving and integrating Canada’s transportation system.

In 2010-2011, a total of 16 new commitments were announced under the Gateways and Border Crossings Fund, including 13 new projects in support of the Atlantic Gateway. Four contribution agreements were signed between Canada and its infrastructure project partners.

In 2010-2011, Transport Canada has also continued to progress on studies and research projects financially supported by the Gateways and Border Crossings Fund that seek to identify challenges and opportunities in Canada’s transportation network.

Program Activity: Gateways and Corridors
($ millions)

	2008-09 Actual Spending	2009-10 Actual Spending	2010-11 Planned Spending	2010-11 Total Authorities	2010-11 Actual Spending	Variance(s)
Total Grants	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Total Contributions	$4.2	$36.9	$425.9	$431.6	$100.0	$325.9
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Total Program Activity(ies)	$4.2	$36.9	$425.9	$431.6	$100.0	$325.9

Comment(s) on Variance(s): In 2010-2011, construction schedules and forecasts for several planned and ongoing infrastructure projects under the Gateways and Border Crossings Fund changed during the fiscal year. This is the main cause of the reported variance. Unforeseen changes in circumstances relating to provincial priorities, as well as construction, administrative and other logistical issues resulted in some approved projects being delayed. For certain announced projects, business cases were not received when expected, which delayed the federal due diligence process.

Audit Completed or Planned: In May 2009, Transport Canada undertook a risk and control assessment of Canada’s Economic Action Plan initiatives specific to the department. The Gateways and Border Crossings Fund was included in this assessment. This fund was also included in Transport Canada’s audit of selected departmental Economic Action Plan initiatives presented to the Departmental Audit Committee in June 2010, which indicated that the department reasonably and appropriately distributed Economic Action Plan funding to eligible recipients and projects, and that suitable monitoring measures were in place.

The Gateways and Border Crossings Fund will be the subject of an audit in 2012-2013 as a part of the department’s Internal Audit Plan.

Evaluation Completed or Planned: An interim evaluation is planned for 2012-2013.

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Northumberland Strait Crossing Subsidy Payment under the Northumberland Strait Crossing Act (Statutory)

Start Date: May 31, 1997

End Date: April 1, 2032

Description: The Northumberland Strait Crossing subsidy payments are made to the bridge operator to honour a constitutional obligation to provide a transportation link between Prince Edward Island and the mainland.

Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system

Results Achieved: Federal funding is provided for continuous and efficient year-round transportation of people and goods between Prince Edward Island and the mainland to support an efficient, integrated and accessible transportation system.

Program Activity: Transportation Infrastructure
($ millions)

	2008-09 Actual Spending	2009-10 Actual Spending	2010-11 Planned Spending	2010-11 Total Authorities	2010-11 Actual Spending	Variance(s)
Total Grants	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Total Contributions	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments	$56.1	$56.7	$57.8	$57.7	$57.7	$0.1
Total Program Activity(ies)	$56.1	$56.7	$57.8	$57.7	$57.7	$0.1

Comment(s) on Variance(s): N/A

Audit Completed or Planned: N/A

Evaluation Completed or Planned: N/A

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Port Divestiture Fund

Start Date: April 18, 1996

End Date: March 31, 2012

Description: The Port Divestiture Fund was created to facilitate the divestiture process by providing new owners/operators with the resources to continue port operations for the foreseeable future.

Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system

Results Achieved: Ports have been successfully transferred to local communities and users, and are more responsive to local needs. In 2010-2011, Transport Canada transferred one regional/local port (Port Stanley, Ontario) and partially transferred one remote port (Bamfield West, British Columbia).

Program Activity: Marine Security
($ millions)

	2008-09 Actual Spending	2009-10 Actual Spending	2010-11 Planned Spending	2010-11 Total Authorities	2010-11 Actual Spending	Variance(s)
Total Grants	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Total Contributions	$0.4	$23.8	$27.0	$21.1	$14.5	$12.5
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Total Program Activity(ies)	$0.4	$23.8	$27.0	$21.1	$14.5	$12.5

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Port divestitures are subject to negotiation with local entities and there were unexpected delays in reaching agreements on expected divestitures in 2010-2011. This resulted in actual spending being less than planned.

Audit Completed or Planned: Transport Canada conducted an internal audit on the Port Divestiture Fund in 2009.

Evaluation Completed or Planned: The program will be evaluated in 2011-2012 as part of the Marine Infrastructure evaluation.

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Contribution program for the operating, capital and start-up funding requirement for regional and remote passenger rail services

Start Date: June 1, 2004

End Date: March 31, 2012

Description: The Regional and Remote Passenger Rail Services Class Contribution Program supports operating, capital and start-up funding requirements for regional and remote passenger rail services by ensuring the continuation of non-via remote and regional passenger rail services.

Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system

Results Achieved: Continuation of safe, viable and reliable regional and remote passenger rail services

Program Activity: Transportation Infrastructure
($ millions)

	2008-09 Actual Spending	2009-10 Actual Spending	2010-11 Planned Spending	2010-11 Total Authorities	2010-11 Actual Spending	Variance(s)
Total Grants	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Total Contributions	$16.5	$20.0	$3.4	$18.3	$17.9	($14.5)
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Total Program Activity(ies)	$16.5	$20.0	$3.4	$18.3	$17.9	($14.5)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Budget 2010 provided additional funding of $14.1 million to the program for 2010-2011. The planned spending of $3.4 million represents the 2010-2011 Economic Action Plan funding from Budget 2009.

Audit Completed or Planned: The Economic Action Plan portion of the program was audited in 2010.

Evaluation Completed or Planned: Evaluation of sub-subactivity 1.3.3.1 (Rail Passenger Stewardship and Support), under which the program falls, was completed in 2010.

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Grant to the Province of British Columbia for ferry and coastal freight and passenger services

Start Date: April 18, 1977

End Date: Grant in perpetuity

Description: The grant provides financial assistance to the Province of British Columbia to provide ferry services in the waters of the province as part of a federal obligation to provide transportation links to the national transportation system from various regions and isolated areas of British Columbia.

Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system

Results Achieved: The grant helps maintain transportation links to the national surface transportation system from various regions and isolated areas of British Columbia.

Program Activity: Transportation Infrastructure
($ millions)

	2008-09 Actual Spending	2009-10 Actual Spending	2010-11 Planned Spending	2010-11 Total Authorities	2010-11 Actual Spending	Variance(s)
Total Grants	$26.3	$26.9	$27.4	$27.4	$26.9	$0.5
Total Contributions	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Total Program Activity(ies)	$26.3	$26.9	$27.4	$27.4	$26.9	$0.5

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The grant amount is indexed annually to the Consumer Price Index, which was lower than expected in 2010-2011.

Audit Completed or Planned: Transport Canada did not conduct an internal audit of this grant in 2010-2011. The department will determine whether an internal audit will be conducted, based on its risk-based audit planning process.

Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation was completed in 2010-2011. The final report is not yet available.

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Ferry Services Contribution Program

Start Date: 1941

End Date: March 31, 2011

Description: The Ferry Services Contribution Program provided financial assistance to maintain interprovincial ferry transportation in Atlantic Canada and Eastern Quebec, more specifically for the service across the Northumberland Strait, between Wood Islands, Prince Edward Island, and Caribou, Nova Scotia, operated by Northumberland Ferries Ltd.; the service between Cap-aux-Meules, Îles de la Madeleine, Quebec, and Souris, Prince Edward Island, operated by CTMA Traversier Ltée; and the service between Saint John, New Brunswick, and Digby, Nova Scotia, operated by Bay Ferries Ltd.

Strategic Outcome: An efficient transportation system

Results Achieved:

• Ferry services are operated more efficiently.
• Certain remote communities have access to national transportation options.
• Canadians in Atlantic Canada and Eastern Quebec benefit from more reliable ferry services.

Program Activity: Transportation Infrastructure
($ millions)

	2008-09 Actual Spending	2009-10 Actual Spending	2010-11 Planned Spending	2010-11 Total Authorities	2010-11 Actual Spending	Variance(s)
Total Grants	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Total Contributions	$16.1	$23.0	$20.3	$25.2	$24.5	$(4.2)
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Total Program Activity(ies)	$16.1	$23.0	$20.3	$25.2	$24.5	$(4.2)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Additional funding was received from Budget 2010 for safety-related projects.

Audit Completed or Planned: Recipient audits were undertaken in 2010-2011 for the 2009-2010 fiscal years. The final reports are not yet available.

Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation of the program was completed in 2009-2010. The evaluation will be posted online in the near future.

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Airports Capital Assistance Program

Start Date: April 1, 1995

End Date: No sunset clause

Description: The Airports Capital Assistance Program assists eligible applicants in financing capital projects related to safety, while contributing to asset protection and operating cost reduction.

Strategic Outcome: A safe transportation system

Results Achieved: The program maintained or increased safety, contributed to asset protection, reduced operating costs and increased the use of environmentally sustainable practices at non-federal airports, where possible.

Program Activity: Aviation Safety
($ millions)

	2008-09 Actual Spending	2009-10 Actual Spending	2010-11 Planned Spending	2010-11 Total Authorities	2010-11 Actual Spending	Variance(s)
Total Grants	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Total Contributions	$ 51.1	$26.3	$38.0	$38.0	$9.6	$28.4
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Total Program Activity(ies)	$51.1	$26.3	$38.0	$38.0	$9.6	$28.4

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The renewal of the Airports Capital Assistance Program was delayed until June 2010 and as a result the completion of many of the projects originally scheduled for 2010-2011 were delayed to 2011-2012. In some cases, entire projects were postponed by a year. The majority of the funds were re-profiled to allow for the completion of these projects.

Audit Completed or Planned: Audits are conducted periodically; some projects will be audited in 2012-2013.

Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation was completed in 2009.

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Outaouais Road Development Agreement

Start Date: January 7, 1972

End Date: The agreement will end once all projects have been completed.

Description: To improve the highway system in the Outaouais region, as per a 50-50 cost sharing agreement concluded on January 7, 1972, between the National Capital Commission and the Ministère des Transports du Québec (subsequently amended September 15, 1972, and again December 4, 1978). Transport Canada has been responsible for administering the agreement since 1996, when Cabinet authorized the transfer of the agreement from the National Capital Commission to Transport Canada. There were no resources provided with the transfer. Ongoing resources of $2.6 million were subsequently obtained; further resources are sought through the Treasury Board submissions for specific projects. Over the past 38 years, the federal government has contributed $263 million to the Outaouais Roads Agreement, of which $85 million has been spent since the administration of the agreement was transferred to Transport Canada in 1996.

Strategic Outcome: An Efficient Transportation System

Results Achieved: Construction of Phase 1 of Highway 5 to extend the divided highway was completed in 2009-2010, and this segment is open to traffic. Construction of Phase 2 of the project started in 2010-2011 and is expected to be complete in 2013-2014. This project will enhance the safety and efficiency of the Outaouais road network.

Program Activity: Highway and Border Infrastructure Support
($ millions)

	2008-09 Actual Spending	2009-10 Actual Spending	2010-11 Planned Spending	2010-11 Total Authorities	2010-11 Actual Spending	Variance(s)
Total Grants	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Total Contributions	$7.3	$3.3	$15.0	$15.0	$1.8	$13.2
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Total Program Activity(ies)	$7.3	$3.3	$15.0	$15.0	$1.8	$13.2

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The environmental assessment for Phase 2 of the Highway 5 project was scheduled to be complete in 2009-2010. However, the completion of the environmental assessment was delayed due to extensive environmental analysis required by the Crown corporation owner of adjacent federal parklands. The additional analysis was needed to properly assess the impacts of the project on these parklands that are ecologically sensitive. The environmental assessment was completed in January 2011 and construction started in February 2011. Initially, the Ministère des Transports du Québec planned a full construction season for 2010-2011 (with planned spending of $15 million). Unfortunately, delays in completing the environmental assessment did not permit construction to start until late in 2010-2011 (resulting in actual spending of $1.8 million).

Audit Completed or Planned: An audit was completed in 2005.

Evaluation Completed or Planned: Evaluations were performed in 2005 and 2009. A new evaluation is planned in 2012-2013.

Name of Transfer Payment Program: Grade Crossing Improvement and Closure Program (approved under the Railway Safety Act)

Start Date: January 1, 1989

End Date: March 31, 2011

Description: Payments made to railway companies and municipalities to improve the safety at public road-railway grade crossings.

Strategic Outcome: A safe transportation system

Results Achieved: Safety improvements at grade crossings that result in accident and incident reductions.

Program Activity: Rail Safety
($ millions)

	2008-09 Actual Spending	2009-10 Actual Spending	2010-11 Planned Spending	2010-11 Total Authorities	2010-11 Actual Spending	Variance(s)
Total Grants	$0.1	$0.1	$0.3	$0.3	$0.2	$0.1
Total Contributions	$7.3	$13.7	$11.1	$8.6	$7.4	$3.7
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Total Program Activity(ies)	$7.4	$13.8	$11.4	$8.9	$7.6	$3.8

Comment(s) on Variance(s): Some Grade Crossing Improvement and Closure Program projects were not completed in time and these delays were reported late in the fiscal year to Transport Canada, which did not allow the department time to move other projects forward. For the Grade Crossing Improvement and Closure Program, not enough requests were received to spend the entire $300,000, and one project was delayed to 2011-2012.

Audit Completed or Planned: No audit is planned in the near future.

Evaluation Completed or Planned: The evaluation was completed in 2010.

Name of Transfer Payment Program: National Safety Code Contribution Program

Start Date: 1987

End Date: March 31, 2015

Description: The purpose of this program is to provide federal support in the form of contributions to projects and recipients that support the national transportation policy to improve the safety of roadways, road users and motor vehicles in Canada. The National Safety Code is intended to ensure commercial motor carrier safety. The National Safety Code is a comprehensive set of 15 standards that provides the minimum performance requirements for all aspects of commercial vehicle, driver and motor carrier safety. The standards address key safety aspects of commercial vehicle operations as set out in the Motor Vehicle Transport Act, such as the Motor Carrier Safety Fitness Certificate Regulations and the Commercial Vehicle Drivers Hours of Service Regulations.

Strategic Outcome: A safe transportation system

Results Achieved:

• Provinces and territories enforce and maintain the safety fitness framework and associated National Safety Code standards for extra-provincial motor carriers, as per the Motor Vehicle Transport Act, including the development and provision of a national Canadian-based training program for commercial drivers and inspectors.
• Motor carriers in all jurisdictions comply with uniform safety standards and operate safely.
• Uniform and quality inspections are undertaken on federal motor carriers.
• The ultimate outcome of this program is the improved safety of our Canadian roads and a reduction in deaths, injuries, collisions and the associated social costs. This supports Transport Canada’s strategic objective of a safe transportation system.

Program Activity: Road Safety
($ millions)

	2008-09 Actual Spending	2009-10 Actual Spending	2010-11 Planned Spending	2010-11 Total Authorities	2010-11 Actual Spending	Variance(s)
Total Grants	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Total Contributions	$4.3	$0	$4.4	$8.8	$8.8	($4.4)
Total Other Types of Transfer Payments	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Total Program Activity(ies)	$4.3	$0	$4.4	$8.8	$8.8	($4.4)

Comment(s) on Variance(s): The funding for 2009-2010 was received late in the year and could not be used by year end. For that reason, the 2009-2010 funding was fully re-profiled to 2010-2011. The 2010-2011 Planned Spending, Authorities and Actual Spending cover the fiscal years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 under Treasury Board submission number 835944.

Audit Completed or Planned: There is no requirement for an audit of the program.

Evaluation Completed or Planned: An evaluation of the program was completed in 2009. There is an evaluation planned for 2013.

Name of Horizontal Initiative: ecotransport Strategy

Name of Lead Department(s): Transport Canada

Lead Department Program Activity: Clean Air from Transportation

Start Date: 2007-2008

End Date: 2010-2011*
*The ecomobility and Marine Shore Power programs were extended to 2011-2012.

Total Federal Funding Allocation (from start date to end date): *As of 2012, total allocation will be $463 million due to a $1.4-million allocation for a one-year extension of the ecomobility ($1.1 million) and Marine Shore Power ($0.3 million) programs.

Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement): The ecotransport strategy involves a series of initiatives designed to reduce the amount of fuel consumed, improve transportation efficiency and introduce cleaner transportation technologies. Launched as part of the Government’s Clean Air Agenda, this strategy features the ecomobility Program; the ecotechnology for Vehicles program; the ecoenergy for Personal Vehicles program (Natural Resources Canada); and the ecofreight programs, which include Natural Resources Canada’s ecoenergy for Fleets program. The ecoauto Rebate Program and Environment Canada’s National Vehicle Scrappage Program were introduced separately but are complementary to the programs for personal vehicles.

(See the ecoaction website.)

• The ecomobility Program is a $9.3-million initiative that seeks to work with municipalities to help cut urban passenger transportation emissions by encouraging commuters to choose public transit or other sustainable transportation options. Working with cities across Canada, this initiative results in programs, services and products that improve sustainable transportation options in urban areas. This program was extended by one year to 2012.
• The ecotechnology for Vehicles program ($14.1 million) includes in-depth testing and showcasing of advanced technologies for vehicles in order to raise awareness, foster important new partnerships with the automotive industry and encourage the introduction of a broader range of environmental technologies in Canada. The ecoenergy for Personal Vehicles program ($21 million), delivered by Natural Resources Canada, will provide fuel consumption information and decision-making tools to encourage consumers to purchase fuel-efficient vehicles that are currently available in the market.
• The ecofreight programs, with $58.7 million in funding, feature new steps to reduce the environmental and health effects of freight transportation through technology and will be delivered by Transport Canada ($36.7 million) and Natural Resources Canada ($22 million). These programs include:
  • the Freight Technology Demonstration Fund ($9.3 million) that has provided cost-shared funding of demonstrations to test and measure new freight transportation technologies in real-world conditions; the Freight Technology Incentives Program ($9.4 million) that has provided cost-shared funding to help recipients purchase and install proven emission-reducing technologies; the ecofreight Partnerships program ($6.6 million) that has built industry partnerships; the Marine Shore Power Program, extended by one year to 2012 ($6 million) that demonstrates the installation and use of shore-based power for marine vessels in Canadian ports; the National Harmonization Initiative for the Trucking Industry ($5.4 million) that identifies regulatory barriers and solutions in collaboration with provinces and territories, so that the Canadian trucking industry can embrace emission-reducing technologies; and the ecoenergy for Fleets program ($22 million), aiming to reduce fuel use and emissions in commercial and institutional fleets via training, sharing of best practices, anti-idling campaigns, technical analysis to look for potential improvements and other technology opportunities.
• The $264-million ecoauto Rebate Program ended in March 2009. The program provided performance-based rebates to consumers who purchased fuel-efficient vehicles.
• Environment Canada’s National Vehicle Scrappage Program is a national program of $92 million over four years, intended to promote the accelerated scrappage of older vehicles.

Shared Outcome(s): The overall objective of the ecotransport Strategy is to reduce energy use and emissions in the transportation sector. All the specific measures envisioned in the strategy are expected to contribute to reduced fuel consumption. As a result, the personal vehicle fleet, as well as the freight sector, will use less energy. Other measures will help reduce the demand for personal transportation and encourage modal shifts to more sustainable transportation options. The strategy will lead to reduced emissions of greenhouse gases and other air pollutants that contribute to smog, thus protecting the environment and the health of Canadians.

Governance Structure(s): Under the ecotransport Strategy, each of the three departments implicated (Transport Canada, Natural Resources Canada and Environment Canada) will manage its respective programs in accordance with defined governance structures for the individual programs concerned. Each program is subject to a results-based management accountability framework that includes committee structures, risk management strategies, as well as provisions for performance measurement, information management, auditing, evaluation and reporting. In addition, a broader horizontal management accountability and reporting framework for the Clean Air Agenda was developed and encompasses, among others, all regulatory and program initiatives for clean transportation, including those of the ecotransport Strategy. The horizontal management accountability and reporting framework includes governance structures; financial, measurement, risk and information management strategies; and lines of reporting.

Performance Highlights: During their fourth and final year of operation, the ecotransport Strategy programs continued to address the challenges of pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from the movement of people and goods in Canada. Regulations have been developed or are being developed to reduce emissions from road vehicles, as well as rail, air and marine transportation. Programs provide information essential to the development of informed regulations and to the coordination and harmonization of regulations across different jurisdictions. Programs also supplement regulations and help ensure their success by tackling two key barriers to reducing pollution from transportation: the lack of information, knowledge and engagement on the part of consumers and industry; and the costs and risks associated with uptake of new technologies. In 2010-2011, the focus was on completing the projects and program activities funded, measuring their impact and gathering information about results and cases to make this available to industry and other stakeholders.

To help inform the regulatory process, the ecotechnology for Vehicles program worked in partnership with vehicle manufacturers, industry associations, government departments and other stakeholders to test and evaluate emerging vehicle technologies in accordance with the test procedures developed by standard testing bodies and important regulatory agencies like the Society of Automotive Engineers. Under the National Harmonization Initiative for the Trucking Industry, two studies were commissioned examining the performance and potential safety implications of emerging add-on aerodynamic devices in the trucking industry. This includes the "Truck Trailer Side Skirts" study that reports on commercially available designs, their construction materials and mounting methods; cost; potential side effects for vehicle safety such as effects on brake cooling; and the ability of side skirts to provide side underrun protection to vulnerable road users such as cyclists.

Addressing the lack of information and improving knowledge is essential to change the behaviour of consumers and industry. A number of programs address this objective. The ecoenergy for Personal Vehicles program helped lower emissions from personal vehicles by providing training on fuel-efficient driving practices to over 580,000 new drivers. The ecoenergy for Fleets program helped reduce emissions from trucking by providing training in fuel-efficient driving practices to over 8000 drivers. To elicit the engagement of stakeholders, the ecoenergy for Fleets program concluded agreements with the trucking industry under which over 500 tractors and trailers were retrofitted with fuel-efficient components. Under the ecoenergy Partnerships program, memoranda of understanding continue to be implemented with the aviation and rail industries. In the aviation industry, annual average fuel efficiency improvements between 1990 and 2009 were 1.9 percent, surpassing the memorandum of understanding-established target of 1.1 percent. The intensity of greenhouse gas emissions from the rail industry similarly decreased by 23 percent by 2008 compared with the 1990 baseline. Finally, under the Freight Technology Demonstration Fund and the Freight Technology Incentives Program, over 30 different information-sharing products were developed, including webinars, technology case studies, greenhouse gas calculators and success stories. These products are available on the program’s website to inform stakeholders of the benefits of green freight technologies. In addition, one newsletter was developed and directly distributed to over 800 freight industry stakeholders to further stimulate technology adoption.

The costs and risks associated with new technologies are important barriers to capital turnover, particularly during a period of economic recession. To address this, the National Vehicle Scrappage Program provided incentives that led to the retirement of over 70,000 old, high-polluting vehicles. The Freight Technology Demonstration Fund and Freight Technology Incentives Program are completing their sponsorship of 40 projects valued at $25 million, covering a wide range of best practices and technology applications such as aerodynamics, electrification, engine innovation and best operating practices. The Marine Shore Power Program completed its second tranche of funding with the provision of $645,000 to the Prince Rupert Port Authority to demonstrate shore power technology for container ships at Fairview Terminal. The ecomobility Program continued to provide funding to 13 projects in 12 communities across Canada, and developed several information and social marketing tools needed to support the implementation of transportation demand management projects across Canada.

Finally, international harmonization and cooperation are essential to emissions reduction. To ensure that Canada’s voice is heard, under the ecofreight programs Transport Canada has contributed to the development of international environmental standards, practices and guidelines under the auspices of the International Civil Aviation Organization, the International Maritime Organization, and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Transport Canada	2.1 — Clean Air from Transportation	eco-MOBILITY	$8.2	$2.8	$2.3	Expected Results for 2010-2011 for ecomobility	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for ecomobility are listed below.

Expected Results for 2010-2011 for ecomobility

Increased use of transportation demand management measures can help reduce urban transportation greenhouse gas emissions. The ecomobility Program responds to two major findings from the Urban Transportation Showcase Program regarding barriers to the use of transportation demand management: a lack of knowledge on the part of Canadian practitioners and decision makers about transportation demand management measures; and a lack of resources to implement initiatives.

Immediate Outcomes:

• Informed positions on policies and programs influencing transportation technologies and practices.
• Increased participation of the target audience in emission-reducing activities through partnerships and other program activities.
• Increased capacity of the target audience to undertake initiatives that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants, or the release of toxic substances.

In 2010-2011, the 14 pilot projects that were announced for funding under the ecomobility Program will enter their second year of implementation. These 12 municipalities (one municipality is delivering two projects) will increase the use of transit, carpooling, and active transportation and pilot initiatives in workplaces and schools to encourage Canadians to use more sustainable modes of transportation, while advancing their understanding of how transportation demand management can work in their community to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by increasing the use of alternatives to single occupancy vehicles. A qualitative and quantitative results measurement and reporting strategy will continue to be implemented in each of the 12 municipalities with respect to the demonstration projects. The project baseline information will be completed in 2009-2010; the first follow-up measurement will occur in 2010-2011; and the final measurement will be completed in 2011-2012. Information on the success factors in implementing various transportation demand management approaches will be shared with other Canadian communities during targeted workshops and Web-based information products in 2010-2011 and 2011-2012, thus increasing the knowledge and use of transportation demand management measures in a broader number of Canadian communities.

In order to further increase the capacity of Canadian municipalities to implement effective transportation demand management strategies to reduce energy consumption, as well as emissions of greenhouse gases and criteria air contaminants, a number of tools will be developed and disseminated under the program in addition to the funded pilot projects. Tools that have already been created and that will be shared more broadly in 2010-2011, will increase the capacity of municipalities to measure the impacts of transportation demand management strategies underway in their communities, and to develop and implement a range of options for small and rural communities; launch community bike-sharing programs/services; establish employee transit discount programs, as well as community-based social marketing approaches to support mode shift away from personal vehicle use; and telework programs and supporting services. New tools that will be developed and disseminated to municipalities in 2010-2011 will include guidelines (with hands-on professional development events) for identifying the business case for successful transportation demand management strategies; and case studies (approximately 10 to 15) on specific topics, including university and school-based transportation demand management initiatives, transit marketing strategies and recent trends in carpooling. The program will deliver/support approximately 20 learning events in 2010-2011.

In 2010-2011, program staff will monitor and track the number of participating municipalities in the above activities, the number of strategies and information products developed, and the size of the target audience reached with the information, so as to link the 2010-2011 program activities with the above immediate outcomes.

Intermediate Outcome:

• Use of transportation best practices that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants.

The program will not report intermediate outcomes until the final year of the program in 2011-2012. The program measurement strategy will be initiated in 2010-2011 to begin to collect information on the outcomes of the program. Indicators have been developed to measure changes in the Canadian capacity to implement the transportation demand management initiatives addressed by this program. These indicators will seek to identify where transportation demand management has been incorporated into municipal plans and operations, and the number of municipalities that add or enhance commitments in their plans and operations. Transportation demand management professionals will be asked to identify the extent to which they increased their knowledge and their ability to implement and measure their initiatives due to program activities. The usefulness of the tools developed by the program will also be measured. The feedback from participants will also be gathered from ecomobility learning activities and information dissemination activities.

Final Outcome:

• Reductions in energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants from transportation.

The program is forecasting a greenhouse gas reduction of 0.11 megatonnes in 2012. This final outcome will be measured in 2011-2012.

Results Achieved in 2010-2011

The ecomobility Program continued to provide funding to 13 projects (one project withdrew) in 13 communities across Canada. Two were completed by the end of March 2011 and the remaining 11 are well underway and are gearing up for their final year as projects are to be completed by December 31, 2011. In 2010-2011, the program also continued to develop tools and resources needed to support the implementation of transportation demand management projects and build national capacity. Some of the new resources published include Changing Transportation Behaviours: A Social Marketing Planning Guide; Bicycle End-of-Trip Facilities: A guide for Canadian municipalities and employers; and the Compendium of Canadian survey research on consumer attitudes and behavioural influences affecting sustainable transportation options, all of which can be found on Transport Canada’s Urban Information Network along with the dozen case studies and issue papers published this year. Learning events such as conferences are another forum for disseminating information resources; the ecomobility Program was represented at seven conferences through conference sessions, workshops, speakers and/or an ecomobility booth. In addition, the program hosted six webinars that attracted approximately 500 participants.

The 13 projects funded under the program are subject to an extensive measurement approach based on reductions in distance travelled and fuel used. In 2010-2011 ecomobility completed the development of its measurement strategy. The strategy includes gathering and analyzing data, and estimating the increased penetration of relevant urban transportation practices. The program is planning on deploying a questionnaire to collect feedback from key stakeholders to help evaluate the intermediate outcomes of the program. Based on this, greenhouse gas and criteria air contaminant reductions will be estimated. Actual greenhouse gas emission reductions will be known in 2012, after the funded projects have provided their final report and after the results measurement strategy has been fully implemented.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Transport Canada	2.1 — Clean Air from Transportation	ecotechnology for Vehicles	$14.1	$2.7	$2.6	Expected Results for 2010-2011 ecotechnology for Vehicles	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for ecotechnology for Vehicles are listed below.

Expected Results for 2010-2011 for ecotechnology for Vehicles

Immediate Outcome:

• Informed positions on policies and programs influencing transportation technologies and practices.
• Increased uptake of technologies that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gases or criteria air contaminants.
• Increased participation of the target audience in emission-reducing activities through partnerships and other program activities.
• Increased capacity of the target audience to undertake initiatives that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants, or the release of toxic substances.

Informed positions on policies and programs influencing transportation technologies and practices will be supported in 2010-2011 by the program’s extensive testing and evaluation of advanced vehicle technologies in Canada. The program will work in collaboration with vehicle manufacturers to acquire and test eight to 10 advanced light-duty vehicles in 2010-2011 — including clean diesel, hybrid, plug-in hybrid, full electric and fuel cell vehicles. These key technologies range from near-term availability in the market (clean diesel, advanced gasoline technologies) to medium-term introduction (electric and plug-in electric hybrid technologies) to longer-term introduction (hydrogen and fuel cell technologies). Test results will evaluate the safety and environmental performance of a range of emerging technologies. This will be used to inform policies, programs, emergent codes and standards, and the program’s outreach activities to reduce barriers to the uptake of these technologies.

The program will also work in collaboration with industry to identify and help address barriers to the adoption of promising technologies for use in Canada, including consumers’ awareness and acceptance of advanced technologies. This will increase the participation of vehicle manufacturers and technology suppliers in educating the Canadian public on emerging emission-reducing vehicle technologies.

The program will continue to draw upon the results of its testing and industry partnerships to disseminate the results of vehicle technology testing and evaluation to Canadians, to promote acceptance and adoption of technology. This will include technical information provided at over 15 public events across Canada; an updated and interactive website with over 60 advanced technology articles and 10 videos; a quarterly public newsletter; and an "edukit"/virtual program that provides resources to secondary school teachers to help them add clean vehicle technology information to the curriculum. The selected program audience targets Canadian men and women who will purchase a vehicle in one to 10 years’ time and who fit pre-determined psychographics. Activity outcomes will be measured using Web metrics, newsletter subscriptions, event attendance and event exit evaluations. Through increased exposure to performance information from a credible, neutral government source, it is anticipated that the targeted Canadian audience will increase its capacity to understand and adopt vehicles with targeted advanced technologies over the near and medium term.

Intermediate Outcome:

• Use of transportation technologies that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants.

The program measurement strategy will be implemented in 2010-2011 to collect information on the immediate and intermediate outcomes of the program. This will include an assessment of the increased penetration of specific advanced vehicle technologies in the Canadian fleet of light-duty vehicles, using the department’s Vehicle Fuel Economy Information System in 2011.

Final Outcome:

• Reductions in energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants from transportation.

The program is forecasting a greenhouse gas reduction of 0.15 megatonnes in 2011. This final outcome will be measured in 2011-2012 using a methodology that includes analyzing market sales data and estimating the increased penetration of relevant advanced vehicle technologies. Based on this, greenhouse gas and criteria air contaminant reductions will be estimated using fuel efficiency data provided by the Fuel Consumption Guide and driving profiles available from the Canadian Transportation Survey.

Results Achieved in 2010-2011

In 2010-2011, the program worked in partnership with industry to acquire, test and evaluate 25 advanced low rolling resistance tires; a Ford Fiesta clean diesel vehicle; a Zero S Electric motorcycle; and a Roush Liquid Propane Gas Retrofit Module installed in a Ford E-150 Econoline van. In addition, the program also developed an extensive electric vehicle strategy, in collaboration with industry, to test and evaluate the performance of several electric vehicles in unique Canadian conditions, including two Mitsubishi iMiEVs, a Tesla Roadster and an A123Systems Hymotion L5 plug-in conversion module installed in a Toyota Prius. Test results for ecotechnology for Vehicles are among the first sets of data detailing the environmental performance of electric vehicles in cold weather conditions.

The program shared these test results with, and participated in, standards development committees and working groups to support the development of new energy consumption and efficiency testing procedures for plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles. In addition, the program supported Canadian efforts to modernize the Canadian Electrical Code to reduce regulatory barriers to the introduction of electric vehicles in Canada. New test procedures for plug-in hybrids were published in 2011, and test procedures for electric vehicles was published in July 2011. In addition, the Canadian Electrical Code will be amended to include electric vehicles in 2011.

By sharing test results, ecotechnology for Vehicles has helped inform and support the development of non-regulatory codes and standards that industry requires to commercialize new technologies in Canada, facilitating the uptake of technologies that reduce energy consumption, and emissions of greenhouse gases and criteria air contaminants. In addition, testing results have helped develop government consumer information programs for these technologies by ensuring that decision makers have access to accurate and independent data.

In 2010-2011, the program undertook a number of educational partnership and outreach activities to enhance Canadians’ knowledge about the environmental and performance benefits of advanced technologies. These activities helped the program’s target audience engage in emission-reducing activities, specifically by helping increase their adoption of advanced vehicle technologies. For example:

• The program’s public website (www.tc.gc.ca/eTV) was updated with new educational and interactive features, including five videos on key program test results, seven interactive animations, a technical photo gallery and seven new technology articles.
• The program worked in partnership with industry to produce the video "The Life Electric" and an electric vehicles primer booklet, both of which provide a high-level overview of electric vehicles, and how government, industry and power utilities are working to prepare for their introduction in Canada.
• The ecotechnology for Vehicles program expanded its media outreach strategy by hosting several technical information sessions and demonstration events for members of the automotive press. As a result, over 25 technical articles about advanced technologies were published in major daily newspapers, websites and blogs across Canada, reaching several hundred thousand Canadians.
• The ecotechnology for Vehicles program completed its project with the Canada Science and Technology Museum to develop educational tools in 2010-2011, including an "edukit" / virtual program, to help secondary school teachers integrate lessons about advanced vehicles and the environment into their curricula.

On March 24, 2011, the program hosted the first Government of Canada Advanced Vehicle Technology Forum. The forum gathered representatives from several federal government departments and provided an opportunity for ecotechnology for Vehicles to present program test results to federal stakeholders in order to support program, policy and regulatory developments.

In 2010-2011 ecotechnology for Vehicles also completed the development of its measurement strategy. The strategy includes gathering and analyzing market sales data and estimating the increased penetration of relevant advanced vehicle technologies. In 2011-2012, the program is planning on deploying a questionnaire to collect feedback from key stakeholders to help evaluate the intermediate outcomes of the program. Based on this, greenhouse gas and criteria air contaminant reductions will be estimated using fuel efficiency data provided by the Fuel Consumption Guide and driving profiles available from the Canadian Transportation Survey. Actual results of the program will be known once the program results measurement strategy has been completed.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Transport Canada	2.1 — Clean Air from Transportation	National harmonization for the trucking industry	$5.4	$1.9	$0.8	Expected Results for 2010-2011 for the National Harmonization Initiative for the Trucking Industry	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for the National Harmonization Initiative for the Trucking Industry are listed below.

Expected Results for 2010-2011 for the National Harmonization Initiative for the Trucking Industry

The National Harmonization Initiative for the Trucking Industry was established to identify and promote solutions to barriers currently slowing the uptake of emission-reduction technologies in the Canadian trucking industry. It was designed to support provinces and territories in their efforts towards regulatory harmonization supporting emission-reduction technologies in the trucking sector.

Immediate Outcome:

• Informed positions on policies and programs influencing transportation technologies and practices.
• Increased uptake of technologies that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants.
• Increased participation of the target audience in emission-reducing activities through partnerships and other program activities.
• Increased capacity of the target audience to undertake initiatives that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants, or the release of toxic substances.

The program has successfully supported the move by Ontario and Quebec to mandate the use of speed limiters for heavy trucks. Although other provinces have also expressed an interest in heavy truck speed limiters, and information will continue to be provided, further regulatory activity on speed limiters is not anticipated within the 2010-2011 time frame.

In 2010-2011, information will be shared with provinces and governments from the ongoing testing of emerging environmental technologies to verify their environmental performance and compliance with regulatory requirements for on-road operation. For example, the program will assess the fuel efficiency improvements and regulatory compliance with safety standards of rear trailer fairings (boat tails) for on-road use in all jurisdictions by Canadian fleets. This is expected to remove barriers to the increased uptake of technologies that reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in the trucking industry.

Intermediate Outcome / Final Outcome:

• Use of transportation technologies and alternative modes that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants.
• Reductions in energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants from transportation.

Increases in the use of specific technologies that reduce energy consumption, greenhouse gas and criteria air contaminants in the trucking sector will be evaluated through the ecofreight demonstration and incentive programs. The National Harmonization Initiative for the Trucking Industry is one of six initiatives under the ecofreight Program that are expected to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by a total of 1.25 megatonnes in 2011. This final outcome will be measured in 2010-2011.

Results Achieved in 2010-2011

Consistent with previous studies assessing the fuel efficiency improvements and regulatory compliance with safety standards of truck environmental technologies, two additional studies were completed. The results are currently being reviewed.

• Winter traction performance of low rolling resistance tires for heavy-duty tractor trailers: Transport Canada investigated the effects that low rolling resistance tires certified by SmartWay (California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board regulations) [have on winter traction performance of tractor trailers that also operate in cold weather climates such as Canada’s by conducting controlled dynamic performance track testing of a loaded heavy-duty tractor trailer in winter conditions. Two full sets of low rolling resistance tires were evaluated against one full set of control tires.
• Side skirts: The department reviewed the aerodynamic performance of commercially available side skirts and wheel covers, including any side effects on both drum and disc brake cooling of redistributed airflow. The ability of side skirts to provide side under run protection to vulnerable road users such as cyclists was also assessed by controlled impact testing of bicycles colliding into side skirts.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Transport Canada	2.1 — Clean Air from Transportation	Freight Technology Demonstration Fund	$9.3	$2.1	$2.0	Expected Results for 2010-2011 Freight Technology Demonstration Fund	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for the Freight Technology Demonstration Fund are listed below.

Expected Results for 2010-2011 for the Freight Technology Demonstration Fund

The Freight Technology Demonstration Fund has supported the purchase, installation and demonstration of the effectiveness of new and underused emission-reducing technologies in the freight industry.

Immediate Outcome:

• Informed positions on policies and programs influencing transportation technologies and practices.
• Increased uptake of technologies that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants.
• Increased participation of the target audience in emission-reducing activities through partnerships and other program activities.
• Increased capacity of the target audience to undertake initiatives that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants, or the release of toxic substances.

The Freight Technology Demonstration Fund has supported industry projects to purchase, install and demonstrate new and underused emission-reducing technologies in the freight industry. These projects will demonstrate technology such as common rail fuel injection, variable-speed gantry container cranes at a port; ultra low-emitting Genset locomotives for yard and road switching; multiple truck technologies (aerodynamic trailer skirts, base flaps, auxiliary power units and single wide-base tires); truck on-board computers and hybrid reefer technology; and an engineless (non-petroleum) auxiliary power unit. These technologies offer promise to contribute to both economic and environmental objectives, as reducing fuel use is vital to the productivity and competitiveness of the transportation industry, as well as to reducing emissions. As of December 2009, 12 demonstration projects are proceeding with total committed funding of $4.1 million.

In 2010-2011, the program will receive information from completed technology projects and disseminate the results to industry through events, case studies and other products that explain the business case for the tested technologies and increase the capacity of industry to take advantage of successful technologies. The ecofreight program will participate in at least four events in Canada to enable the transfer of knowledge acquired from demonstration projects to the broader industry. Events will consist of freight industry conferences, annual general meetings and trade shows where ecofreight program staff will participate along with industry partners. The ecofreight Web-based Information Network will be a key outreach tool and will be enhanced in 2010-2011 with published demonstration results achieved by specific companies and other information enabling the transfer of knowledge to industry. This will broaden the participation of members of the freight industry in emission-reducing activities and technology uptake beyond the initial funding recipients.

Intermediate Outcome:

• Use of transportation technologies and alternative modes that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants.
• Use of transportation best practices that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants.

The final stage of the program measurement strategy will be initiated in 2010-2011 to collect information on the outcomes of the program. Indicators have been developed to measure changes in the uptake, awareness and acceptance of new and underused energy-efficient freight technologies supported by the program. Freight transportation professionals and technology suppliers/users will identify the extent to which they increased their knowledge, and their ability to implement and use energy-efficient technologies due to program activities. The usefulness of case studies developed by the program will also be measured.

Final Outcome:

• Reductions in energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants from transportation.

The Freight Technology Demonstration Fund is one of six initiatives under the ecofreight programs that are expected to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 1.25 megatonnes in 2011. This final outcome will be measured in 2010-2011.

Results Achieved in 2010-2011

In 2010-2011, the Freight Technology Demonstration Fund helped mitigate barriers to a broader adoption of technologies in the freight industry by finalizing the establishment of 12 cost-shared demonstration projects to test and measure new and underused freight transportation technologies in real-world conditions. These projects took place across Canada, in each transportation mode.

The Freight Technology Demonstration Fund activities focused on completing and measuring the emissions results of the projects funded under the program, and disseminating those project results to industry. In conjunction with the Freight Technology Incentives Program, the Freight Technology Demonstration Fund developed over 30 different information-sharing products, including webinars, technology case studies, greenhouse gas calculators and success stories. These products are available on the program’s website to inform stakeholders of the benefits of green freight technologies. In addition, a newsletter was developed and directly distributed to over 800 freight industry stakeholders to further stimulate technology adoption.

The 12 projects funded under the Freight Technology Demonstration Fund programs are subject to extensive greenhouse gas emission measurement approaches based on reductions in fuel consumption through the use of clean technology. The impact of the program will be assessed through a series of information-gathering exercises for which measurement strategies were developed. These include project results analysis and approaches to collect the information such as questionnaires to stakeholders. Actual program emissions reductions will be available once the program’s results measurement has been completed in 2011-2012.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Transport Canada	2.1 — Clean Air from Transportation	Freight Technology Incentives Program	$9.4	$1.7	$1.6	Expected Results for the 2010-2011 Freight Technology Incentives Program	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for the Freight Technology Incentives Program are listed below.

Expected Results for 2010-2011 for the Freight Technology Incentives Program

The Freight Technology Incentives Program has provided incentives for companies to purchase and install proven freight transportation technologies that reduce greenhouse gas and/or criteria air contaminants.

Immediate Outcome:

• Informed positions on policies and programs influencing transportation technologies and practices.
• Increased uptake of technologies that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants.
• Increased participation of the target audience in emission-reducing activities through partnerships and other program activities.
• Increased capacity of the target audience to undertake initiatives that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants, or the release of toxic substances.

The Freight Technology Incentives Program has supported industry projects to purchase and install available freight transportation technologies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and/or criteria air contaminants. These contribution funds to industry support the purchase and installation of a mix of technologies that include: ultra low-emitting Genset locomotive technology, alternative fuel for baggage tractors, refurbishing marine engines with the latest fuel-efficient technology, bundled advanced truck technologies (e.g., aerodynamic truck technologies, advanced auxiliary power technologies for trucks, single tire technologies and long combination vehicle options for trucks). These technologies offer promise to meet both economic and environmental objectives, as reducing fuel use and emissions is vital to productivity and competitiveness of the industry.

In 2010-2011, the program will receive information from completed technology projects and disseminate the results to industry through events, case studies and other products that explain the business case for the tested technologies and increase the capacity of industry to take advantage of successful technologies. The ecofreight programs will participate in at least four events in Canada to enable the transfer of knowledge acquired from demonstration projects to the broader industry. Events will consist of freight industry conferences, annual general meetings and trade shows where ecofreight program staff will participate along with industry partners. The ecofreight Web-based Information Network will be a key outreach tool and will be enhanced in 2010-2011 with published demonstration results achieved by specific companies and other information enabling the transfer of knowledge to industry. This will broaden the participation of members of the freight industry in emission-reducing activities and technology uptake beyond the initial funding recipients.

Intermediate Outcome:

• Use of transportation technologies and alternative modes that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants.

The final stage of the program measurement strategy will be initiated in 2010-2011 to collect information on the outcomes of the program, including uptake in the industry of technology addressed by this program. Indicators have been developed to measure changes in the uptake, awareness and acceptance of energy-efficient freight technologies supported by the program. Freight transportation professionals and technology suppliers/users will provide information on the extent to which they increased their knowledge and their ability to implement and use energy-efficient technologies due to program activities. The usefulness of case studies developed by the program will also be measured.

Final Outcome:

• Reductions in energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants from transportation.

The Freight Technology Incentives Program is one of six initiatives under the ecofreight Program that are expected to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 1.25 megatonnes in 2011. This final outcome will be measured in 2010-2011.

Results Achieved in 2010-2011

In 2010-2011, the Freight Technology Incentives Program helped mitigate barriers to broader adoption of technologies in the freight industry by finalizing the establishment of 26 cost-shared projects to purchase and install proven freight transportation technologies. These projects took place across Canada, in each transportation mode.

Freight Technology Incentives Program activities focused on completing and measuring the emissions results of the projects funded under the program and disseminating those project results to industry. In conjunction with the Freight Technology Demonstration Fund, over 30 different information-sharing products were developed, including webinars, technology case studies, greenhouse gas calculators and success stories. These products are available on the program’s website to inform stakeholders of the benefits of green freight technologies. In addition, one newsletter was developed and directly distributed to over 800 freight industry stakeholders to further stimulate technology adoption.

The 26 projects funded under the Freight Technology Demonstration Fund programs are subject to extensive greenhouse gas emission measurement approaches, based on reductions in fuel consumption through the use of clean technology. The impact of the program will be assessed through a series of information-gathering exercises for which measurement strategies were developed. These include project results analysis and approaches to collect the information, such as questionnaires to stakeholders. Actual program emission reductions will be available once the program’s results measurement has been completed in 2011-2012.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Transport Canada	2.1 — Clean Air from Transportation	Marine Shore Power Program	$5.7	$1.7	$1.1	Expected Results for the Marine Shore Power Program	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for the Marine Shore Power Program are listed below.

Expected Results for 2010-2011 for the Marine Shore Power Program

The Marine Shore Power Program will complete the funding of the project selected in September 2008 as part of the Round 1 selection process.

Immediate Outcome:

• Informed positions on policies and programs influencing transportation technologies and practices.
• Increased uptake of technologies that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants.
• Increased participation of the target audience in emission-reducing activities through partnerships and other program activities.
• Increased capacity of the target audience to undertake initiatives that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants, or the release of toxic substances.

In 2010-2011, the Marine Shore Power Program will complete its $2.0-million investment in a marine shore power facility at Port Metro Vancouver. This $9-million project demonstrates the use of shore-based power for marine vessels in Canadian ports to reduce air pollution from idling ship engines and will be in operation for a second cruise season in 2010-2011. The emissions impact and business case will continue to be measured as part of the demonstration project. The Marine Shore Power Program will support an additional demonstration project for completion in 2011-2012.

Information collected through these demonstration projects will improve the industry’s knowledge of the funding required to build this type of infrastructure, as well as the emissions reduction that can be expected, and the partnerships necessary to deliver shore power (e.g., with an electricity provider). It will also document the business case for this technology at Canadian ports. These are necessary resources if Canadian ports are to develop the capacity to implement shore power on a wider scale.

Intermediate Outcome:

• Use of transportation technologies and alternative modes that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants.

The program’s measurement strategy will be initiated in 2010-2011 to collect information on the outcomes of the program with respect to increased take-up and capacity for marine shore power in Canada. Indicators have been developed to measure changes in the uptake, awareness and acceptance of technology approaches supported by the program. These indicators will measure the extent to which port professionals and technology suppliers/users increased their knowledge and their ability to implement shore power technologies. The usefulness of case studies developed by the program will also be measured.

Final Outcome:

• Reductions in energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants from transportation.

The Marine Shore Power Program is expected to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by .008 megatonnes in 2012. This final outcome will be measured in 2011-2012.

Results Achieved in 2010-2011

The main barriers to implementing marine shore power in Canadian ports include the initial cost of these installations for port and terminal operators, the lack of experience in Canada with this technology and the lack of a proven business case for shore power in the freight industry.

The Marine Shore Power Program helped overcome barriers to implementing marine shore power by providing financial contributions for two selected projects. The Vancouver Fraser Port Authority was selected to build a marine shore power installation for cruise ships at the east and west berth at its Canada Place facility. The second project was announced in September 2010. The Prince Rupert Port Authority project is eligible to receive up to $1.8 million from Transport Canada for the demonstration of shore power technology for container ships at its Fairview Terminal.

In 2010-2011, Marine Shore Power Program activities focused on initiating the Prince Rupert project and developing information-sharing products, including a video that shows how shore power works for cruise ships and provides the project partners’ perspective through insightful interviews. This video will be uploaded to the Transport Canada website, and will be available for showing at trade shows and conferences to disseminate information.

In its final year, the program’s activities will focus on completing the monitoring of the Prince Rupert Project, disseminating project results to industry to mitigate the information barriers to the adoption of marine shore technology and initiating the program’s performance assessment. The program’s final report will be available in 2012-2013 once the program is complete and its results have been measured.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Transport Canada	2.1 — Clean Air from Transportation	ecofreight Partnerships	$6.6	$1.5	$1.0	Expected Results for 2010-2011 ecofreight Partnerships	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for ecofreight Partnerships are listed below.

Expected Results for 2010-2011 for ecofreight Partnerships

Immediate Outcomes:

• Informed positions on policies and programs influencing transportation technologies and practices.
• Increased uptake of technologies that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants.
• Increased participation of the target audience in emission-reducing activities through partnerships and other program activities.
• Increased capacity of the target audience to undertake initiatives that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants, or the release of toxic substances.

In 2010-2011, the ecofreight Partnerships program will contribute to the 2010 Canadian Industrial Transportation Association’s annual survey of Canadian industry to better understand the Association’s environmental practices and decision making with respect to transportation. This annual survey, which will have generated five years of consecutive information and trends by 2010-2011, helps understand the drivers for industry decision making, as well as industry’s knowledge of the environmental impacts of its decisions and the mitigating options that it can take.

The program will support at least three events with the freight transportation industry and/or industry shippers to transfer knowledge and information on emission-reducing technologies and best practices. With this knowledge, users will be better able to include environmental impacts in the decision-making process when selecting between modes and carriers during their freight transportation decisions. The program will sponsor at least one industry award to recognize industry environmental leaders with respect to transportation and to promote their best practices to their peers.

Overall, the program will develop and disseminate information and tools to stakeholders, including freight shippers and forwarders, to increase awareness of sustainable transportation options. This program will support several outcomes, including increased knowledge and opportunities for uptake of technologies that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas and criteria air contaminants, as well as increased capacity of the target audience to undertake initiatives that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminant emissions and increased participation of the freight industry in emission-reduction activities.

In 2010-2011, Transport Canada will continue to provide an increased presence in international committees, working groups and other international transportation fora with a dedicated focus on emission reduction (e.g., the International Civil Aviation Organization, International Maritime Organization, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, International Transport Forum and Commission for Environmental Cooperation). Transport Canada will also continue to provide support to the international development of environmental standards, practices and guidelines, contributing to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and air pollutants, and the improved efficiency of the aviation and marine sectors under the auspices of the International Maritime Organization and the International Civil Aviation Organization.

These initiatives will contribute to more informed positions on policies and programs influencing transportation technologies and practices; and to the dissemination and use of transportation best practices that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas and criteria air contaminants.

Transport Canada will continue to support implementing the voluntary memorandum of understanding with the Railway Association of Canada, in effect until 2010, that identifies commitments by the Canadian railway companies to reduce greenhouse gas and criteria air contaminant emissions on a voluntary basis.

Transport Canada will continue to collaborate with domestic aviation industry organizations, including the Air Transport Association of Canada and National Airlines Council of Canada. This initiative supports the industry’s efforts to reduce emissions and improve fleet and fuel efficiency, and the uptake of new technologies and best practices with the goal of reducing greenhouse gas and criteria air contaminants.

Final Outcome:

• Reductions in energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants from transportation.

The ecofreight Partnerships program is one of six initiatives under the ecofreight Program that is expected to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 1.25 megatonnes in total in 2011. This final outcome will be measured in 2010-2011.

Results Achieved in 2010-2011

The Canadian freight transportation sector faces a considerable challenge in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and air pollutants. The ecofreight Partnerships program has established a partnership with the freight industry and the international community to address this challenge in order to:

• contribute to more informed positions on policies and programs influencing transportation technologies and practices that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas and criteria air contaminants;
• increase uptake of technologies that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants;
• increase participation of the target audience in emission-reducing activities through partnerships and other program activities; and
• increase the capacity of the target audience to undertake initiatives that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants, or the release of toxic substances.

The ecofreight Partnerships program has an overarching role in the suite of ecofreight programs in contributing to mitigate the barriers to adopting new and proven technologies and practices in the freight transportation sector by engaging freight industry leaders to improve fleet and fuel efficiency, and increase their uptake of new technologies and best practices, with the goal of reducing emissions of greenhouse gases and criteria air contaminants.

More specifically, the program had an opportunity to create greater awareness and seek support within the Canadian freight transportation industry by distributing the information gained from the funded projects of the Freight Technology Demonstration Fund and the Freight Technology Incentives Program. It achieved this by distributing its newsletter to 950 freight industry stakeholders; by sharing the success stories of the industry in reducing its environmental footprint; and by supporting events such as the Low Carbon Shipping panel at the globe 2010 event in Vancouver, the Sustainable Rail Initiatives and Research panel at the Rail Association of Canada’s North American Rail Summit 2010 in Montreal and a webinar on ecofreight intermodal freight initiatives in Canada.

The program recognized the industry’s effort to reduce emissions by sponsoring the Green Supply Chain Award (awarded annually at the Supply Chain & Logistics Association Canada and Canadian Industrial Transportation Association’s Annual Conference) that was awarded to Bison Transport.

The ecofreight programs also added four more tools to their website to support the freight transportation industry’s efforts to reduce emissions, including a link to the jointly developed Checklist for Green Transportation Options for Shippers and Freight Forwarders (hosted on the Supply Chain and Logistics Association Canada website).

The program also built and maintained partnerships within the transportation sector to reduce emissions from transportation through voluntary actions that can support the regulatory framework through the memoranda of understanding with the Railway Association of Canada and with the aviation sector. Both reported encouraging results.

The intensity of rail industry greenhouse gas emissions decreased by 23.3 percent in 2008 compared with the 1990 baseline. The 2009 locomotive emissions monitoring report will be released in 2011. This memorandum of understanding expired December 31, 2010.

In the air industry, between 1990 and 2009, the average annual fuel efficiency improvement in litres per total revenue-tonne-kilometre was 1.9 percent, surpassing the target of 1.1 percent improvement per year that was established by the aviation memorandum of understanding. Fuel intensity per revenue-tonne-kilometre also fell by 30 percent between 1990 and 2009, compared to the memorandum of understanding target of 24 percent cumulative improvement to be achieved by 2012.

Through the ecofreight Partnerships program, Transport Canada continued its presence at international fora and on international committees, resulting in more informed positions on policies and programs influencing transportation decision making in Canada; fostering of key relationships with other nations; and the sharing of information and best practices related to the reduction of emissions. Transport Canada had integral input into the development of negotiating positions, measures, standards, regulations, action plans, declarations and outcome statements.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Transport Canada	2.1 — Clean Air from Transportation	ecoauto	$252.7	$0	$0	Expected Results for 2010-2011 ecoauto	The program has now ended; there are no expected results for 2010-2011.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Transport Canada	2.1 — Clean Air from Transportation	Analytical and Policy support	$4.0	$1.0	$0.8	Expected Results for 2010-2011 Analytical and Policy support	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for Analytical and Policy support are listed below.

Expected Results for 2010-2011 for Analytical and Policy support

Transport Canada will work with the provinces and territories, and other federal departments and agencies to improve data and analytical capacity. Work will include the development of a data strategy, and pilot projects in collaboration with some jurisdictions. The goal of this initiative is to update Transport Canada’s core knowledge and data to contribute to more informed positions on policies and programs related to energy consumption, and the reduction of emissions of greenhouse gas and criteria air contaminants.

Policy support will also be provided for the evaluation of Transport Canada’s ecotransport programs and reporting on the Kyoto Protocol Implementation Act reporting.

Results Achieved in 2010-2011

The department collaborated with Environment Canada, Statistics Canada, and all provincial and territorial jurisdictions to implement four high-priority projects (creating a national road transportation fuel consumption database; improving Statistics Canada’s New Motor Vehicle Sales Survey to include vehicle sales by class and improving the distinction between light-duty vehicle versus heavy duty vehicle sales; improving Statistics Canada’s Monthly Refined Petroleum Products Survey; and implementing findings of the Canadian Vehicle Use Study).

Transport Canada provided analytical support for the evaluation of the ecotransport programs and reporting on the Kyoto Protocol Implementation Act.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Natural Resources Canada	2.1 — Clean Energy	ecoenergy for Fleets	$22.0	$6.0	$4.9	Expected Results for 2010-2011 ecoenergy for Fleets	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 ecoenergy for Fleets are listed below.

Expected Results for 2010-2011 for ecoenergy for Fleets

Output targets for 2010-2011

• Financial support: The department expects to receive 10 proposals under the ecoenergy for Fleets funding opportunity for 2010-2011 with funding of up to $1 million.
• Partnerships and networks: The ecoenergy for Fleets program is expected to develop partnerships and networks through participation in 15 trade shows and 30 meetings with industry.
• Training and education: The department expects to train 2,200 transportation professionals, including drivers, driving instructors, mechanics and fleet managers, in fuel-efficient driving, maintenance and business practices during 2010-2011.
• Research studies: Transport Canada expects to complete two research studies to support the development of an energy-efficient tire consumer information program that will steer purchasers to low rolling resistant and energy-efficient tires. The studies will examine the performance elements of energy-efficient tires and tire-purchasing decisions.

Immediate Outcome targets for 2010-2011

Informed positions on policies and programs influencing transportation technologies and practices.

• The program team will use knowledge gained through research studies related to energy-efficient tires and tire-purchasing decisions to plan outreach initiatives and more comprehensive messaging for the trucking sector.

Increased participation in emission-reducing activities through partnerships and other program activities.

• Increased participation in emission-reducing activities will be achieved through delivery of up to 10 collaborative agreements.

Increased capacity to undertake initiatives that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants, or the release of toxic substances.

• The capacity of transportation professionals (drivers, driver trainers, mechanics and managers) to address emissions through their decision making will be enhanced through training and through the provision of decision-support tools and information materials, including workshops. These knowledge transfer opportunities encompass training 2,200 transportation professionals; mounting 45 workshops; and receiving 25,000 web hits. Additionally, capacity to undertake emissions-reducing projects will be increased through the provision of up to $1 million in funding, which will enable fleets to gain valuable on-road experience with energy-efficient fleet vehicle technologies.

Intermediate Outcome targets for 2010-2011

Use of transportation best practices that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants.

• The department expects that 2,200 professional drivers and fleet managers trained in fuel efficiency best practices will apply these practices on the road and within fleets to secure fuel savings and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Natural Resources Canada	2.1 — Clean Energy	ecoenergy for Personal Vehicles	$21.0	$5.7	$4.7	Expected Results for 2010-2011 ecoenergy for Personal Vehicles	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for ecoenergy for Personal Vehicles results are listed below.

Expected Results for 2010-2011 for ecoenergy for Personal Vehicles

Output targets for 2010-2011

• Financial support: Transport Canada expects to receive 20 proposals under the ecoenergy for Personal Vehicles funding opportunity, for funding of up to $1 million.
• Partnerships and networks: The department expects to hold two meetings with the auto industry.
• Training and education: The department expects 125,000 new drivers will be trained in fuel-efficient driving practices.
• Information and decision support/analysis: The department expects to target purchasers of new vehicles through the production of the 2011 EnerGuide for Vehicles fuel consumption guide and the most fuel-efficient vehicles list.

Immediate Outcome targets for 2010-2011

Increased participation in emission-reducing activities through partnerships and other program activities.

• Increased participation in emission-reducing activities will be achieved through delivery of at least five collaborative agreements.

Increased capacity to undertake initiatives that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants, or the release of toxic substances.

• Capacity to address emissions from personal vehicles through better driving practices and purchases of more fuel-efficient vehicles will be enhanced through the training of 125,000 new drivers and through the national distribution of information materials such as the 2011 Fuel Consumption Guide with a targeted circulation of 350,000 units. Additionally, funding of up to $1 million for emission-reducing projects will enable proponents to deliver targeted outreach activities aimed at increasing consumer awareness and adoption of energy-efficient buying, driving and maintenance practices for personal vehicles.

Intermediate Outcome targets for 2010-2011

• Use of transportation best practices that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants.
• The department expects that 31,250 new drivers will employ fuel-efficient driver behaviours as a result of the fuel-efficient driving techniques learned through training.

Results Achieved in 2010-2011

Outputs

• Financial support: A total of 37 proposals were received and five proposals were funded at a cost of $488,000.
• Partnerships and networks: The department held three meetings with the auto industry to discuss vehicle labelling and the Fuel Consumption Guide.
• Training and education: Over 500,000 new drivers were trained in fuel-efficient driving best practices.
• Information and decision support/analysis: The program produced and released the 2011 EnerGuide for Vehicles fuel consumption guide and the most fuel-efficient vehicles list.

Immediate Outcomes:

Increased participation in emission-reducing activities through partnerships and other program activities: Five new agreements were funded in 2010-2011 that will enable proponents to deliver training in fuel-efficient driving practices.

Increased capacity to undertake initiatives that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants, or the release of toxic substances: Approximately 580,000 new drivers were exposed to fuel-efficient driving information and have been equipped with the information required to reduce their energy consumption while driving. Additionally, $488,000 in funding provided to proponents made it possible to deliver targeted fuel-efficient driving instruction to 10,500 experienced drivers. An online version of the 2011 Fuel Consumption Guide, as well as 300,000 print copies, were made available to Canadians to enable them to make more energy-conscious vehicle-purchasing decisions.

Intermediate Outcomes:

Use of transportation best practices that reduce energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants: As a result of 580,000 new drivers receiving training in better driving practices, over 290,000 Canadians are expected to actively use fuel-efficient driving techniques, based on program surveys that consider adoption and retention rates.

Final Outcome:

Reductions in energy consumption, or greenhouse gas or criteria air contaminants from transportation: As a result of activities undertaken by the ecoenergy for Personal Vehicles program since its launch in 2007, including the exposure of approximately 1.9 million new drivers to fuel-efficient driving materials, Canadians have reduced their annual consumption of energy by 3.19 petajoules (PJ), which yields a greenhouse gas reduction of 0.21 megatonnes. Additionally, a memorandum of understanding with automobile manufacturers achieved a greenhouse gas reduction of between 3.10 and 3.40 megatonnes upon its termination in 2007-2008.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Human Resources and Skills Development Canada	Policy, Program and Service delivery support	ecoauto	$11.3	$0	$0	Expected Results for 2010-2011 ecoauto	The program has now ended; there are no expected results for 2010-2011.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Environment Canada	3C. Risks to Canadians, their health and their environment from air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions are reduced.	National Vehicle Scrappage Program	$92.0	$42.6	$30.2	Expected Results for 2010-2011 for the National Vehicle Scrappage Program	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for the National Vehicle Scrappage Program are listed below.

Expected Results for 2010-2011 for the National Vehicle Scrappage Program

Financial support

• The "Retire Your Ride" program will continue to run in every province, delivered by a network of not-for-profit organizations coordinated by Summerhill Impact (formerly Clean Air Foundation). The goal is to retire at least 50,000 old vehicles annually, representing a smog reduction of about 2,250 tonnes.
• Canadians who own older vehicles (1995 and earlier models) will be encouraged to retire them and to choose from a range of attractive rewards such as free transit passes; rebates on bicycles; memberships in car-sharing programs; and rebates on the purchase of a new vehicle offered by vehicle manufacturers.
• Real-time program results are tracked using a national database.

Outreach

• Regional program delivery agents will promote Retire Your Ride through local outreach activities.
• The second wave of a public awareness campaign will be implemented by the Canadian Urban Transit Association, with contribution funding from Environment Canada. Posters will be displayed on buses and bus shelters across the country.

Partnership and network

• An exhibit on vehicle recycling and sustainable transportation will be on display at the Biosphere, and smaller, travelling versions of the exhibit will be displayed in one or two other Canadian museums.

Guidelines and agreements

• To ensure responsible recycling of vehicles, all vehicle recyclers participating in the Retire Your Ride program will adhere to the National Code of Practice that outlines the legal requirements and best environmental management practices before, during and after vehicle recycling.
• Up to 350 audits will be conducted through on-site visits to participating vehicle recyclers to verify their compliance with the code of practice.

Results Achieved in 2010-2011

The Retire Your Ride program achieved or surpassed its expected achievements in 2010-2011. Just over 70,000 vehicles were retired, resulting in an estimated reduction of 2,550 tonnes of smog-forming emissions. Canadians in every province were offered one of a selection of rewards for retiring their older vehicles, including $300 cash, free transit passes, bicycle rebates and car-sharing memberships. The cash reward is the most popular reward, selected by 92 percent of participants. In addition, vehicle manufacturers continued to offer vehicle rebates ranging in value from $500 to $3,000 on the purchase of one of their new vehicles.

The program was successfully promoted through outreach activities, national advertising, public relations initiatives, and a public awareness campaign on buses and bus shelters.

The department audited 348 vehicle recyclers for adherence to the code of practice for vehicle recycling and only 3 percent of these recyclers failed this audit and had to leave the program.

Total Allocation For All Federal Partners (from Start to End Date) ($000s)	Total Planned Spending for All Federal Partners for 2010-2011 ($000s)
$463,000	$69,529

Comments on Variances: There was a surplus in ecotransport Strategy initiative activity as a result of delays in negotiating a contribution agreement for the Marine Shore Power Program that affected project implementation and associated staff costs; industry proponents re-scoping some freight technology projects to reduce costs as a result of the economic downturn; lack of uptake of funding available to provinces under the National Harmonization Initiative for the Trucking Industry Program; and a contribution to the National Vehicle Scrappage Program that was re-profiled to 2011-2012 to wrap up activities, and was allocated to other priorities.

Contact information: Alain Paquet, Manager, Performance Measurement Unit, Environmental Program, Transport Canada, 613-990-5394, alain.paquet@tc.gc.ca

Name of Horizontal Initiative: Marine Security

Name of Lead Department(s): Transport Canada

Lead Department Program Activity: Marine Security

Start Date: 2001

End Date: Ongoing

Total Federal Funding Allocation (from start date to end date): N/A

Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement): Marine Security is a horizontal initiative that is linked to the government’s key priority of A Safe and Secure Canada. Its aim is to improve the security of Canada’s marine domain, including territorial waters, inland waterways and ports. Elements of this initiative include:

• increased domain awareness, surveillance and tracking of marine traffic;
• improved coordination of and cooperation on marine security, including the development of Marine Security Operations centres;
• a security clearance program for marine-sector employees;
• new detection equipment at Canadian ports to monitor containers;
• additional resources for emergency and law enforcement response capacity in the marine domain; and
• international initiatives that will ensure Canada meets current international standards and obligations, including those being developed by the International Maritime Organization.

Shared Outcome(s): The following are planned shared outcomes and activities. Key areas include:

• domain awareness: Canada’s surveillance and awareness efforts within marine areas;
• responsiveness: enforcement efforts in cooperation with all relevant police forces and security agencies;
• safeguarding: efforts to enhance the physical security of marine infrastructure of other critical infrastructure in or around marine areas; and
• collaboration: efforts in support of all other activities to ensure the various federal and provincial departments, agencies and police forces, and other groups with a responsibility for marine security work together.

Immediate Outcomes:

Immediate outcomes of the Marine Security initiative are:

• increased surveillance and awareness of the marine security environment;
• increased on-water presence;
• enhanced security measures at ports and marine facilities;
• increased capability to respond to marine threats;
• increased stakeholder awareness and understanding;
• increased stakeholder ability to meet marine security requirements; and
• increased cooperation between government departments and agencies involved with marine security.

Intermediate Outcomes:

Immediate outcomes will be:

• effective domain awareness;
• rapid and effective response to marine threats and incidents;
• a security-conscious culture among stakeholders;
• stakeholder compliance with security regulations; and
• increased collaboration: internationally, with industry partners, multilateral organizations, provinces and municipalities.

Ultimate Outcomes:

The final outcomes of this initiative are expected to be:

• an effective and efficient marine security system;
• high public confidence in Canada’s marine security system; and
• a marine security system that facilitates the efficient and legitimate flow of people and goods.

Strategic Outcome:

• The expected strategic outcome will be a marine system that contributes to the security, safety and prosperity of Canadians, and of our allies.

Governance Structure(s): The Government of Canada created the Interdepartmental Marine Security Working Group, chaired by Transport Canada, to identify and coordinate federal actions in support of Canada’s objectives with regard to public security and anti-terrorism in the marine domain, as well as its international marine security obligations. Under the guidance of the Interdepartmental Marine Security Working Group, key departments are responsible for the following:

Transport Canada

The department leads the government’s initiatives in marine security enhancements, including:

• policy coordination;
• chairing of the Interdepartmental Marine Security Working Group;
• regulatory development in support of marine security initiatives;
• the Marine Security Oversight and Enforcement Program;
• the Marine Transportation Security Clearance Program; and
• participation in the Marine Security Operations centres.

Fisheries and Oceans Canada, and the Canadian Coast Guard

These organizations contributed to the enhancement of domain awareness within the Canadian Exclusive Economic Zone through increased surveillance activities and the implementation of shore-based automatic identification system infrastructure and the development of a long-range vessel tracking capability. In addition, they increased their level of on-water capability for providing platform support to respond to marine security incidents. The organizations also participate in the Marine Security Operations centres.

Public Safety Canada

Public Safety Canada is the country’s lead department for public safety. The department coordinates efforts with portfolio agencies, federal partners, other levels of government (including international allies) and stakeholders in building national policies and programs dealing with national security, emergency management, law enforcement, corrections, crime prevention and border integrity. This includes, for example, the development and implementation of marine-based counter-terrorism exercises.

Canada Border Services Agency

The Canada Border Services Agency’s mandate is to manage the nation’s borders at ports of entry by administering and enforcing the domestic laws that govern trade and travel, as well as international agreements and conventions. The work of the Canada Border Services Agency includes identifying and interdicting high-risk individuals and goods, working with law enforcement agencies to maintain border integrity and engaging in enforcement activities, including seizure of goods, arrests, detentions, investigations, hearings and removals.

Royal Canadian Mounted Police

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police is responsible for enforcing federal statutes, leading national security and organized crime investigations across Canada on both land and water, and for maintaining border integrity between ports of entry.

National Defence

The department contributes to enhanced domain awareness of the strategic high-traffic coastal area. It leads the Marine Security Operations centres on the coasts and participates in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Marine Security Operations centres. It works with partner departments and agencies to improve interdepartmental tactical operations. Lastly, it leads the IMIC3 project (approved January 10, 2011) that will improve tactical communications between the various departmental/agency vessels at sea.

Performance Highlights:

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Transport Canada	Marine Security	a) Marine Security Coordination Fund	$16.2	$2.0	$1.9	Expected Results for the Marine Security Coordination Fund	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for the Marine Security Coordination Fund are listed below.

Funding was provided for the following projects:

• Commercial Marine Examination Mapping Process (Canada Border Services Agency);
• Arctic Security and Foreign Marine Research in Canada (Canada Border Services Agency);
• Enhanced Marine Order Coordination (Canadian Space Agency);
• Prince Rupert Coordinated Port Surveillance Platform (Royal Canadian Mounted Police);
• Waterside Security: Review of Roles and Responsibilities (Transport Canada);
• Operational Tool Kit Project (Royal Canadian Mounted Police);
• Small Vessel and Facility Stakeholder Outreach (Transport Canada);
• Commercial Marine Examination Framework (Canada Border Services Agency); and
• the amendment to Secure Tactical Communications for funding to purchase secure hand-held radios (Canadian Coast Guard).

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Transport Canada	Marine Security	b) Oversight and Enforcement	$54.1	$6.9	$11.7	Expected Results for Oversight and Enforcement	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for Oversight and Enforcement are listed below.

Significant progress continues to be made in revising the Marine Transportation Security Regulations. Phase I series of amendments to the existing Marine Transportation Security Regulations will:

• meet international requirements (vessel personnel certification under the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), 1974) and seafarer access to marine facilities;
• address interpretation issues and regulatory gaps;
• harmonize with the U.S. regulatory regime ; and
• contribute to the reduction of red tape for industry.

Security measures were developed for a tall ships event at the Redpath Toronto Waterfront Festival in May 2010, as well as for the G-20 summit to help secure the waterfront in downtown Toronto in May 2010.

Significant support and coordination were provided during the G-8/G-20 summits in Toronto. This included developing the Marine Security Concept of Operations and Contingency Plan, as well as carrying out several periodic inspections and security assessments of ports, facilities and vessels in the Ontario Region.

Nationally, more than 155 marine facility and vessel certifications (including domestic ferry vessels and facilities) were also issued in 2010-2011.

Several Marine Security operations bulletins and Marine Security operations policies were issued to provide awareness to stakeholders, regional inspectors and other government departments.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Transport Canada	Marine Security	c) Marine Security Policy and Interdepartmental Coordination	$5.0	$0.8	$1.0	Expected Results for Marine Security Policy and Interdepartmental Coordination	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for Marine Security Policy and Interdepartmental Coordination are listed below.

• The Maritime Security Strategic Framework and the Maritime Domain Awareness Strategy are near final approval.
• The quick and organized resumption of commercial activities at Canada’s ports in the event of a disruption to maritime commerce resulting from a security incident, emergency or natural disaster is paramount for Canada’s economy. As such, Transport Canada’s Marine Security Program has worked closely with maritime stakeholders to develop the National Maritime Commerce Resumption Strategy. Maritime commerce resumption activities took place at the ports of Halifax, Hamilton and Montreal, as did the integrated Maritime Commerce Resumption workshop between these ports and Port Metro Vancouver.
• A Transport Canada- / Royal Canadian Mounted Police-led study on waterside security roles and responsibilities is ongoing.
• Following the approval of small vessel and facility security recommendations, security awareness brochures were published and have been distributed to stakeholders at national and regional Canadian Marine Advisory Council and Recreational Boating Advisory Council meetings. In addition, regional small vessel security workshops were held in British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec and Atlantic Canada.
• On July 1, 2010, the memorandum of understanding on offshore facility security between the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board and Transport Canada came into effect. The memorandum of understanding on offshore facility security between the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board and Transport Canada was prepared.
• In partnership with the Organization of American States / Inter-American Committee against Terrorism, Transport Canada Marine Security participated in international marine security capacity-building activities in the Americas and the Caribbean.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Transport Canada	Marine Security	d) Marine Transportation Security Clearance Program	$11.8	$1.6	$0.7	Expected Results for the Marine Transportation Security Clearance Program	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for the Marine Transportation Security Clearance program are listed below.

• All ports captured under this program are fully compliant.
• To date, over 15,587 port workers have been processed across Canada under this program.
• In 2009, Transport Canada and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police signed a new memorandum of understanding to provide expanded criminal background checks on individuals working in restricted areas or performing certain duties at Canadian marine ports. This means transport security clearance decisions are based on more complete data from a broader range of intelligence sources than previously.
• Guidance tools for existing inspection forms were developed to assist inspectors in their day-to-day compliance and enforcement duties.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Transport Canada	Marine Security	e) Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Marine Security Operations Centre (design team)	$9.1	$1.9	$0.7	Expected Results for the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Marine Security Operations Centre (design team)	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Marine Security Operations Centre (design team) are listed below.

Implementation of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Marine Security Operations centres project continues. Transport Canada staffed three positions in 2010-2011 at the interim Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Marine Security Operations centres, and is collaborating on the continued design and development for final project approval and delivery, which is forecast for 2016.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Fisheries and Oceans Canada	Safe and Accessible Waterways	a) Increased On-Water Patrols	$10.0 (annually and ongoing)	$ 10.0	$ 10.0	Expected Results for Increased On-Water Patrols	Due to the transition of data systems within the fleet, results (with respect to operational days) will not be available until Fall 2011.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Fisheries and Oceans Canada	Safe and Accessible Waterways	b) Automatic Identification System and Long Range Identification and Tracking	$27.5	$4.0	$2.5	Expected Results for the Automatic Identification System and Long-Range Identification and Tracking	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for the Automatic Identification System and Long-Range Identification and Tracking are listed below.

• To date, 100 percent of the Automatic Identification System’s base stations are installed and an interim software contract solution is currently in place. Automatic Identification System shore infrastructure has been integrated within Marine Communications and Traffic Services centres and, to date, 19 Marine Communications and Traffic Services centres and 113 radio sites across Canada (excluding the Arctic) have been fitted with Automatic Identification systems.
• As there have been several delays in implementing the full Automatic Identification System solution, factory acceptance (full operational capacity) is not scheduled until the end of 2011-2012. An interim solution has been installed and National Defence is being fed raw Automatic Identification System positional data. This interim solution will continue to be maintained until the final contracted version has been completed, tested and installed.
• The department completed full national implementation of the Long-Range Identification and Tracking System.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Fisheries and Oceans Canada	Safe and Accessible Waterways	c) Great Lakes/ St. Lawrence Seaway Marine Security Operations Centre	$3.2 (annual and ongoing)	$3.2	$2.0	Expected Results for the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Marine Security Operations Centre	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Marine Security Operations Centre are listed below.

• Reliability of Canadian Coast Guard maritime vessel traffic information for use at Marine Security Operations centres (proportion of year information is fully available):
  • target: 99.7 percent
  • results: 99.7 percent
• The system has been available and reliable. No major equipment/system breakdown occurred that affected the availability of service to Marine Security Operations centres.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Fisheries and Oceans Canada	Safe and Accessible Waterways	d) Marine Security Enforcement Teams	$18.0	$5.0	$6.2	Expected Results for Marine Security Enforcement Teams	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for Marine Security Enforcement Teams are listed below.

• The Marine Security Enforcement Teams supported G-8/G-20 meetings held in the Greater Toronto Area.
• The teams also supported ad hoc law enforcement requests in all areas of Canadian waters (e.g., requests relating to the MV Sun Sea, MV Ocean Lady, drug interdictions, etc.).
• Due to the transition of data systems within the fleet, quantitative results regarding operational days will not be available until late Fall 2011.
• Interdepartmental Marine Security Working Group-funded secure tactical radios are included in actual spending figures.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Fisheries and Oceans Canada	Safe and Accessible Waterways	e) Construction of Mid-Shore Patrol Vessels	$68.5	$8.0	$27.0	Expected Results for Construction of Mid-Shore Patrol Vessels	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for Construction of Mid-Shore Patrol Vessels are listed below.

A contract was awarded for the mid-shore patrol vessels, and construction commenced in September 2010. Marine Security Enforcement Team vessels will come into service by 2012 and early 2013; all vessels will be delivered by 2014.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Fisheries and Oceans Canada	Safe and Accessible Waterways	f) Increased Surveillance Flights	$7.0 (annually and ongoing)	$7.0	$7.0	Expected Results for Increased Surveillance Flights	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for Increased Surveillance Flights are listed below.

The department provided aerial surveillance coverage for the migrant vessel on the West Coast and other operations over this period. All operations were successful and Fisheries and Oceans Canada flew approximately 4,486 hours in 2010-2011.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Canada Border Services Agency	Risk Assessment	a) Radiation Detection Equipment Initiative	$42.1	$0.3	$0.4	Increased security measures at ports and marine facilities	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for the Radiation Detection Equipment Initiative are listed below.
	Enforcement			$4.5	$4.9
	Internal Services			$0.3	$0
		Total	$42.1	$5.1	$5.3

The Canada Border Services Agency performed 2.5 million scans under its radiation screening program. Of these, 28,973 resulted in an alarm, as a result of which additional radiation screening was performed. All risks were mitigated. Personal radiation detectors have begun to be distributed in the field. Marine officers operating at all major marine ports (Halifax, Montreal, Vancouver, Prince Rupert) have received and are using the units; further deployment will be initiated shortly for the air cargo mode.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Canada Border Services Agency	Risk Assessment	b) Passenger and Crew Screening Initiative	$52.9	$0.8	$2.2	Increased security measures at ports and marine facilities	CBSA increased security measures at ports and marine facilities. The Agency screened 100 percent of all vessels entering Canadian waters and boarded selected vessels identified as high risk.
	Enforcement			$1.3	$1.4
	Facilitated Border			$0.8	$0.4
	Conventional Border			$3.1	$3.0
	Internal Services			$0.9	$0
		Total	$52.9	$6.9	$7.0

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Canada Border Services Agency	Risk Assessment	c) Cruise Ship Inspections	$35.3	$0	$0	Increased security measures at ports and marine facilities.	Increased security measures at ports and marine facilities. Screened 100% of all vessels entering Canadian waters. Boarded selected vessels identified as high-risk.
	Enforcement			$0	$0.5
	Facilitated Border			$0.1	$0.5
	Conventional Border			$4.3	$3.8
	Internal Services			$0.2	$0
		Total	$35.3	$4.6	$4.8

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Public Safety	Conventional Border	a) Marine-Based Counterterrorism Exercises (sometimes referred to as “scenario-based training”)	$1.2	$0.2	$5.0	Results Achieved for Marine-Based Counter Terrorism Exercises	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for Marine-Based Counter Terrorism Exercises are listed below.

For Charlottetown, P.E.I., a building block approach has been established to prepare the region for a full-scale exercise involving a security incident and with maritime implications affecting the Confederation Bridge. The full-scale exercise will be followed by a tabletop exercise dealing with consequence management due to closure of the bridge for more than a month. To date (June 2011) the following activities have been completed:

• An information session was held to introduce the exercise and identify all partners.
• A workshop on roles and responsibilities was held during which each organization presented what it would do during the incident and explained what type of information can be shared during a security incident, as well as how and with whom.
• A tabletop exercise on roles and responsibilities was conducted to demonstrate the linkage between each player and prepare the group for the full-scale exercise planned for September 21-22, 2011.
• Two planning conferences were held to plan the full-scale exercise.

Forthcoming activities:

• Writing board and final planning conference: writing of injects for both the tabletop exercise (consequence) and full-scale exercise (security); preparation of manuals for players and evaluators/controllers; and synchronization of the master sequence event list
• Full-scale exercise (security) September 21, 2011
• Tabletop exercise (consequence management) September 22, 2011

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Public Safety	Conventional Border	b) Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Marine Security Operations Centre (Design Team)	$1.6	$0.3	$0.2	Results Achieved for the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Marine Security Operations Centre	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Marine Security Operations Centre are listed below.

• The department participated in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Marine Security Operations Centres National Representatives Working Group [and provided overall policy coordination and support in developing the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Marine Security Operations Centre’s Concept of Operations and the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Marine Security Operations Centre’s legal analysis.
• Transport Canada participated in a Maritime Domain Awareness and Counter-Piracy working group and provided policy support towards developing a Treasury Board submission on establishing a permanent facility for the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Marine Security Operations Centre.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
National Defence	Generate and Sustain Integrated Forces — Generate and Sustain Forces Capable of Maritime Effects — Operational Units	a) Coastal Marine Security Operations Centres	$165.0	$22.5	$9.8	Expected Results for Coastal Marine Security Operations Centres	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for the Coastal Marine Security Operations Centres are listed below.

• The Marine Security Operations Centres Project received effective project approval on March 24, 2011.
• Transport Canada prepared for project management and engineering support contracts to be used during the project’s implementation phase.
• The department initiated the development of the Marine Security Operations Centres Capability Management Organization to support the Marine Security Operations centres capability upon project close-out.
• The project increased cooperation between departments and agencies.
• It provided effective domain awareness and support to the core partner departments and agencies.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
National Defence	Generate and Sustain Integrated Forces — Generate and Sustain Forces Capable of Maritime Effects — Operational Units	b) Interdepartmental Maritime Integrated Command Control and Communication	$10.0 +7.0 recurring O&M yearly commencing 2013	$0.1 (for definition phase)	$0.1	Expected Results for Interdepartmental Maritime Integrated Command Control and Communication	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for Interdepartmental Maritime Integrated Command Control and Communication are listed below.

• A contract was awarded on January 14, 2011 ($11 million).
• A contractor kick-off meeting was held.
• The department performed a system requirement review with the contractor.
• The department met with various working groups to address the training, security and ILS components of the project.
• The department completed and authorized the preliminary design review.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
National Defence	Conduct Operations — Domestic and Continental Operations — Conduct Ongoing Operations and Services to Canadians	c) Increased On-Water Presence/Coordination (Marlant and Joint Task Force)	$5.0 annual recurring amount	$5.0	$5.7	Expected Results for Increased On-Water Presence/ Coordination	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for Increased On-Water Presence / Coordination are listed below.

The department provided additional sea day funding to Maritime Canada to enable the Canadian Forces to further contribute to maritime surveillance / Maritime Domain Awareness within Canada’s coastal approaches.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Royal Canadian Mounted Police	Conduct Operations — Domestic and Continental Operations — Conduct Ongoing Operations and Services to Canadians Marine Security	a) National Ports Project	$1.0	$1.0	Included in the actual for 6 (b). See below.	Expected Results for the National Ports Project	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for the National Ports Project are listed below.
		b) National Port Enforcement Teams	$4.4	$4.4	$5.7	Expected Results for National Port Enforcement Teams	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for National Port Enforcement Teams are listed below.

• The National Port Enforcement Teams continue to have very strong relationships with core partners such as the Canada Border Services Agency and local law enforcement agencies.
• National Port Enforcement Teams recovered 698 stolen vehicles that were being exported mainly from the Port of Montreal and the Port of Halifax. This is a sharp increase compared to the 300 vehicles seized in the previous year. The approximate value of the recovered stolen vehicles is $15 million. The seizures led to a number of charges in the Montreal, Toronto and Calgary areas involving organized crime groups.
• National Port Enforcement Teams also seized a total of 668 kg of cocaine and 27 tonnes of hashish during this period. Investigations are being pursued, with court proceedings expected to follow.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Royal Canadian Mounted Police	Conduct Operations — Domestic and Continental Operations — Conduct Ongoing Operations and Services to Canadians	c) Marine Security Emergency Response Team Training	$0.6	$0.6	$0.3	Expected Results for Marine Security Emergency Response Team training	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for Marine Security Emergency Response Team training are listed below.

• The Emergency Response Team Marine Intervention training course is delivered once a year. Emphasis is placed on tactical proficiency while operating safely in a marine environment.
• "O" Division and "C" Division Marine Security Emergency Response Teams have completed over 80 training sessions during the past fiscal year. A recruiting and in-house training program was put in place to identify and train suitable candidates to ensure human resources sustainability in both divisions. Both teams were involved in a week-long joint training exercise at Kingston in May 2010 to ensure interoperability and maintain operational standards.
• Support is being provided to the Marine Security Emergency Response teams through continuous research and tactical innovation. Required improvement and evolution of equipment remains ongoing and is necessary to ensure safe and efficient operations.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Royal Canadian Mounted Police	Conduct Operations — Domestic and Continental Operations — Conduct Ongoing Operations and Services to Canadians	d) Marine Security Emergency	$5.6	$5.6	$4.6	Expected Results for Marine Security Emergency Response Teams Re-profiled funding carried forward to 2007-2008	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for Marine Security Emergency Response Teams are listed below.

• Marine Security Emergency Response Teams were involved in several high-risk operations and assisted other units, as well as other agencies.
• While both Marine Security Emergency Response Team units participated in the G-8 and G-20 summits, the "O" Division team was also involved in two other major visits. The "C" Division team participated, for an extended period of time, in a major marine security operation. "C" Division has put in place an emergency plan in cooperation with the St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation (Corporation de gestion de la voie maritime du St-Laurent).

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Royal Canadian Mounted Police	Forensic Identification	e) Marine Transportation Clearance Program	$0.2	$0.2	$0.1	Expected Results for the Marine Transportation Clearance Program	A significant amount of fingerprint submissions from Transport Canada were processed for security clearance purposes.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Royal Canadian Mounted Police	Marine Security	f) Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Marine Security Operations Centre	$3.0	$0	$2.5	Expected Results for the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Marine Security Operations Centre	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 by the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Marine Security Operations Centre are listed below.

• Implementation of the Marine Security Operations Centre’s collection plan and the increased involvement of core partners and other law enforcement agencies within the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway are contributing to obtaining a better marine domain awareness picture within the Marine Security Operations Centre.
• The use of the Marine Security Operations Centre’s mobile radar has improved our domain awareness, but more sensor equipment is required for the monitoring of small vessels.
• Substantive units and other law enforcement agencies requested the support of the mobile radar to assist during joint operations, including operations involving the United States.
• As part of its mandate, the centre supported the G-8 and G-20 operations, and conducted two major threat and risk assessments.
• The building project is meeting its timelines with the approval of the Treasury Board submission. Consultation continues with the project management team.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Royal Canadian Mounted Police	Conduct Operations — Domestic and Continental Operations — Conduct Ongoing Operations and Services to Canadians	g) National Waterside Security Coordination Team	$0.9	$0.8	$0.9	Expected Results for the National Waterside Security Coordination Team	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for the National Waterside Security Coordination Team are listed below.

• The National Waterside Security Coordination Team is a fully integrated law enforcement team with representation from Vancouver, Niagara Falls and Halifax. The program supported an Interdepartmental Marine Security Working Group study involving clarification of on-water roles and responsibilities.
• Additional research was completed for the "Waterside Security in Canada: Phase II" study.
• The National Waterside Security Coordination Team coordinated activities associated with the Domestic Small Vessel Security Strategy and the Operational Tool Kit program in Vancouver.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Royal Canadian Mounted Police	Conduct Operations — Domestic and Continental Operations — Conduct Ongoing Operations and Services to Canadians	h) Marine Security Enforcement Teams	$6.3	$0	$4.8	Expected Results for Marine Security Enforcement Teams	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for Marine Security Enforcement Teams are listed below.

• The Marine Security Enforcement Teams held vessel open houses that were attended by approximately 1,000 visitors and participated in major boat shows to increase public awareness of the Marine Security Enforcement Teams.
• The Marine Security Enforcement Teams participated in the Marine Security Emergency Response Teams training and the delivery of the Tactical Vessel Operator course.
• The Marine Security Enforcement Teams helped improve our marine domain awareness through their partnership with the Canadian Coast Guard and with other law enforcement agencies, and by providing the Marine Security Operations centres with timely information and intelligence.
• The Marine Security Enforcement Teams increased their intelligence gathering and reporting capacity over the previous year.
• The Marine Security Enforcement Teams participated in several joint operations, national and international, involving human trafficking, drug importation and other border-related criminal activities. Overall, participation in operations and investigations with substantive units and other federal departments and/or law enforcement agencies have increased and contributed to the safety and security of Canada.

Comments on Variances:

Transport Canada

1. The Coordination Fund was not fully subscribed in 2010-2011, as the final transfers did not take place due to Parliament dissolving.
2. Due to pressures related to critical marine security projects, including the Emergency Management and Quality Management System, Transport Canada reallocated $1.2 million to cover these initiatives.
3. Costs related to the Marine Transportation Security Clearance Program were less than originally anticipated.
4. Great Lakes Marine Security Operations Centre costs were less than originally anticipated due to staffing delays.

Fisheries and Oceans Canada, and the Canadian Coast Guard

1. Additional Fleet Operations: N/A
2. Automatic Identification and Long-Range Identification and Tracking: The contractor replaced the subcontractor that formed part of the original winning bid due to technical issues with its software. This has caused a one-year delay in the delivery of the system. The delivery of the complete and compliant system will not occur until the end of 2011-2012.
3. The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Marine Security Operations Centre: One million dollars was carried forward from 2010-2011 to 2011-2012. The Great Lakes Marine Security Operations Centre was declared 24/7 by the Canadian Coast Guard in April 2011. This and relocation costs being lower than expected contributed to the carry-forward.
4. Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Marine Security Enforcement Teams: An unanticipated additional $1.19 million was spent for the Marine Security Enforcement Teams program due to fuel prices, secure tactical radios and unforeseen refit costs.
5. Acquisition of Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Mid-Shore Patrol Vessels: The variance of $2.78 million is due to an adjustment to the 2010-2011 budget to meet production milestones.
6. Enhanced Conservation and Protection Aerial Surveillance Flights: N/A

National Defence

Sections a & b

Variance:

1. Marine Security Operations Centre Vote 5: Funds were conserved as contingency for delays in receiving Environmental Protection Agency approval in case the project was adversely affected by an election.
2. Marine Security Operations Centre Vote 1: The centres are currently being staffed, and the Capability Management Organization for future capability support has not yet been formed.

Contact information: Fulvio Fracassi, Director General, Marine Security, Transport Canada, 613-991-4173, fulvio.fracassi@tc.gc.ca

Name of Horizontal Initiative: Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative

Name of Lead Department(s): Transport Canada

Lead Department Program Activity: Gateways and Corridors

Start Date: October 19, 2006

End Date: March 31, 2014

Total Federal Funding Allocation (from start date to end date): $1.045 billion

Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement): The Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative is intended to strengthen Canada’s competitive position in global commerce. It is an integrated package of investment and policy measures that will advance the capacity and efficiency of the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor into North America. It reflects the Government of Canada’s undertaking to work in partnership with provincial governments, the private sector and other stakeholders to further develop and exploit Western Canada’s geographic advantage and strong transportation system. The initiative seeks to establish Canada’s Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor as the best transportation network facilitating global supply chains between North America and Asia.

Shared Outcome(s): The following are planned shared outcomes and activities for the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative.

Key themes include:

• gateway capacity: strategic infrastructure investments and network improvements;
• competitiveness: increase Canada’s share of Asia-Pacific commerce;
• efficiency and reliability: improve the movement of goods throughout supply chains;
• security and border efficiency: establish a secure and efficient transportation network linking Canadian and North American markets; and
• regulatory framework: integrate policy frameworks and regulations that address new approaches to governance.

Ultimate Outcome:

• Boost Canada’s commerce with the Asia-Pacific region.
• Increase the Gateway’s share of North America-bound container imports from Asia.
• Improve the efficiency and reliability of the Gateway for Canadian and North American exports and imports.
• Ensure travel routes are safe, open to through traffic and minimize environmental impacts.

Governance Structure(s): The Minister for the Pacific Gateway is the champion for this initiative, with support in this effort provided by Transport Canada. The Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities is accountable for the management of resources in the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Transportation Infrastructure Fund. These two ministers are jointly responsible for the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative.

The Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative is a horizontal initiative, and its development and implementation involve a number of other key federal departments/agencies. While each is ultimately accountable for its own programs/activities and associated resources from the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative fund, the implicated federal departments/agencies are also responsible for contributing to the overarching objectives of the initiative. All federal partners are accountable for the day-to-day management of their respective component of the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative. Furthermore, each department/agency is expected to provide regular updates to the two lead ministers, through the director general-level Interdepartmental Steering Committee on the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative.

An overall horizontal performance framework has been prepared in collaboration with all the departments/agencies involved in the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative. This framework will provide a sound, coordinated and ongoing performance measurement and evaluation strategy to assess the overall process in implementing the initiative. Partner departments and their role in the initiative are as follows:

Transport Canada

Transport Canada, as the lead department, reports to the Minister for the Pacific Gateway and to the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities. Transport Canada’s Policy Group is responsible for the ongoing coordination, management, integration, and strategic development and implementation of the initiative overall. Other federal departments and agencies, the four western provinces and stakeholders from the private sector are consulted and involved in building consensus on decisions related to the initiative.

Transport Canada is also responsible for the management of the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Transportation Infrastructure Fund, whose primary objective is to address capacity challenges facing the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor. The projects funded under the fund will enhance the competitiveness, efficiency and capacity of Canada’s multimodal transportation network and will be focused specifically on the movement of international commerce between the Asia-Pacific region and North America.

While transportation infrastructure is at its core, the initiative also focuses on interconnected issues that impact on the further development and exploitation of the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor. Transport Canada has completed a number of non infrastructure / competitiveness measures and is currently engaged in many others, including:

• a policy renewal agenda to examine policy issues that directly impact the efficiency of the transportation infrastructure that defines the Gateway and Corridor, or its exploitation;
• a security review to assess issues related specifically to the Gateway’s reputation and performance;
• roundtable events across western provinces and an international conference to advance understanding of the long-term challenges and opportunities of the Gateway by tapping into Canadian and international academic expertise;
• the integration of the three major ports in British Columbia’s Lower Mainland to improve efficiency and capacity;
• support for the establishment of the Lower Mainland Trucking Forum to make recommendations, on a consensus basis, on methods for improving the efficiency of trucking operations at Vancouver ports; and
• studies directly related to the Gateway’s operations and efficiency, to better understand and improve the multimodal infrastructure network and increase the productivity of the full supply chain.

Foreign Affairs and International Trade

The Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Pacific Gateway International Marketing Group is responsible for the ongoing development and implementation of an international marketing strategy in coordination with all stakeholders. The objective is to promote greater use of the Gateway as the Asia-Pacific travel and supply chain route of choice for North American and Asia-Pacific importers, exporters, investors and transportation companies.

Key missions abroad are actively engaged in advancing Canada as the gateway and corridor of choice through dialogue with transportation companies, producers, exporters and/or importers in each of their respective regions to showcase the strengths of the Canadian transportation network. These missions encourage investment and technology transfer, play an advocacy role on key Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative issues such as security and border efficiency; provide intelligence back to Canada to support policy development; and help determine what messages resonate in their markets.

The Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade has established a core group of trade commissioners from Asia-Pacific and North American missions who understand the Gateway and the opportunities it presents for Canada’s economy and are, thereby, able to support the government’s objective of establishing Canada as the gateway and corridor of choice between North America and the Asia-Pacific region.

Canada Border Services Agency

The Canada Border Services Agency is responsible for the implementation of a marine container inspection operation located at the Port of Prince Rupert. The marine container inspection operation allows the Canada Border Services Agency to develop operations to ensure containers arriving from other countries are properly inspected by means of effective processes and state-of-the-art technology.

The Canada Border Services Agency’s marine container inspection operation plays a vital and strategic role, integrated within the overall Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative.

Parks Canada Agency

Parks Canada is responsible for the maintenance and recapitalization of highways that pass through national parks, including the Trans-Canada Highway. It is a major pan-Canadian highway that connects the West Coast and its Asia-Pacific linkages to the rest of Canada, especially markets in the western provinces.

Parks Canada is in the process of four-laning (twinning) the Trans-Canada Highway through the Banff National Park of Canada to improve capacity and efficiency. The funding provided by the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative will help ensure the timely completion of a congested 10-kilometre section of highway and hence support the initiative’s objective of improving the movement of goods through the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor.

It should be noted that funding is also being contributed from other sources for other sections of the Trans-Canada Highway twinning project.

Western Economic Diversification Canada

Western Economic Diversification Canada was responsible for two elements of the first phase of the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative: a business opportunities and awareness-raising initiative called "Seizing the Gateway Opportunity: Western Canada and the Asia-Pacific Challenge"; and funding of the dredging work on the Fraser River to maintain a competitive shipping channel.

As part of "Seizing the Gateway Opportunity," Western Economic Diversification Canada supported research on successful gateway economies and how best to capitalize on the long-term, value-added economic opportunities presented by the rise of the Asia-Pacific market; case studies of successful Canadian small and medium enterprises in the Asia-Pacific market; a Canadian presence at the China International Fair for Investment and Trade; a study tour of Western Canadian innovation capabilities by trade commissioners from Canadian posts in the Asia-Pacific region; and an assessment of community-level needs in Saskatchewan and Manitoba for doing business in and with Asia.

Western Economic Diversification Canada provided a $4-million grant over two years to the Fraser River Port Authority to support dredging activities on the Fraser River shipping channel. This funding provided the Fraser River Port Authority with the capacity to maintain its existing business and position itself to attract new business, thereby taking advantage of the Asia-Pacific Gateway opportunities. This temporary measure enabled the port to accommodate the increasingly large shipping vessels, until a long-term solution is developed that would provide for self-sustaining access to port facilities.

Human Resources and Skills Development Canada

Human Resources and Skills Development Canada is responsible for the Asia-Pacific Gateway Skills Table (Skills Table). Modelled on the Sector Council Program, the Skills Table was established in March 2008 to help address the skills and labour pressure issues related to the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative. The development of the Skills Table follows a one-year fast-track consultative and planning process designed to inform the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative’s future policy direction and investment decisions.

Human Resources and Skills Development Canada was provided with $3 million over four years through the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative to fund projects prioritized by the Skills Table. These funds will support projects in priority areas identified by the Skills Table. Human Resources and Skills Development Canada is providing an additional $2 million to support the establishment and operation of the Skills Table (total federal investment is $5 million).

The Skills Table acts as a clearinghouse, ensuring sharing of data, projects, timetables, strategies, recruitment and retention practices, and related ideas. It provides a focused forum to identify, coordinate and leverage investments to address skills issues related to the Asia-Pacific Gateway.

Performance Highlights: In 2010-2011, development of reliability indicators and performance metrics was completed. These indicators are intended to measure the reliability of transit times for containers originating from Asian ports through Asia-Pacific Gateway ports and beyond. The indicators will help quantify Canada’s international trade supply chain performance and will provide the starting point for targeting bottlenecks.

Dedicated funding under the Transportation Infrastructure Fund has been fully committed to strategic projects with six projects completed and four more under construction in 2010-2011. In addition, two contribution agreements/amendments were signed with Port Metro Vancouver and Corporation of Delta for 80th Street.

In 2010-2011, as part of the Asia-Pacific Skills Table, six projects were underway focusing on customizing and updating industry-certified programs in response to workplace skills requirements, workplace training, support and skills development, as well as comparative analysis of international best practices in gateway industries. This helps foster a stronger understanding and articulation of labour requirements in the Gateway.

In addition, promotion of Canada’s tax and duty advantages for international trade (including foreign trade zone-type programs) to public- and private-sector stakeholders continued, and a waiver of the 25-per-cent duty on imports of all general cargo vessels and tankers was announced.

International and domestic outreach continued with the second International Conference on Gateways and Corridors in November 2010, attracting renowned experts and practitioners from Canada and abroad, as well as the Chinese Minister of Transport. The conference was funded by Transport Canada and discussions provided new perspectives on key issues that will inform the further development of Canada’s Gateway strategies.

Several ministerial missions to Asia have helped build momentum and raise Canada’s profile internationally, further leveraging Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative international outreach efforts.

To better promote the advantages of the Asia-Pacific Gateway abroad, Transport Canada:

• launched a re-vamped Asia-Pacific Gateway website and interactive map to provide updates on the projects and initiative;
• launched a series of Pacific Gateway video vignettes ;
• updated Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative background materials and distributed Gateway Corridor News, Spring 2010 edition, an e-news update from the Minister on the Asia-Pacific Gateway to multiple domestic and international stakeholders; and
• released a report to Canadians on the progress of the initiative entitled Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative Reaches a Milestone.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Transport Canada	1.2 — Gateway and Corridors Transport Canada	Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Transportation Infrastructure Fund	$944.2	$243.9	$123.5	Expected Results for the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Transportation Infrastructure Fund	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Transportation Infrastructure Fund are listed below.

Data Collection

• Transport Canada conducted research on industry best practices in the innovation and development of reliability indicators and performance metrics. These indicators are intended to measure the reliability of transit times for containers originating from Asian ports through Asia-Pacific Gateway ports. The indicators will quantify Canada’s international trade supply chain performance and will provide the starting point for targeting bottlenecks.

Infrastructure Projects

• The dedicated Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative Transportation Infrastructure Fund has been fully committed to strategic projects.

  Two agreements were signed:

  1. Port Metro Vancouver; and
  2. Corporation of Delta for 80th Street.

  Six projects were completed in 2010-2011:

  1. Pitt River Bridge and Mary Hill Interchange;
  2. Highway 97 — Wright Station Curves;
  3. River Road Improvements — Foley Crescent to CN Fraser River Bridge;
  4. Derwent Way left turn lanes;
  5. Chester Road Centre left turn lane; and
  6. Southern Railway of BC - Rail Barge Ramp.

  Four projects are under construction:

  1. RBRC #3 152nd Street Overpass;
  2. RBRC #8 80th St. Overpass;
  3. NSTA: Brooksbank Avenue Underpass; and
  4. CentrePort Canada Way Project.

Regional Transportation Management Centre and Smart Corridors

• The department concluded the project design work for the Regional Transportation Management Centre. It also negotiated a funding agreement with stakeholders, including the British Columbia Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, and the South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority (TransLink).
• The department also completed the development and design work, including negotiating the funding agreement for the Regional Traffic Data Systems project as part of a Smart Corridors component.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Transport Canada	1.2 — Gateway and Corridors Transport Canada	Competitiveness Investment	$12.3	$2.0 [1]	$1.7	Expected Results for Competitiveness Investment	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for Competitiveness Investment are listed below.

Research and Studies

• Five analytical studies were conducted. This analytical work included the development of a consistent Graphical Information System database for the Metro Vancouver area, as well as an international shipping line database. Other analytical work looked at the movement of freight across the Canada-U.S. border in British Columbia, third-party logistics providers and their supply chains, and environmental initiatives currently being undertaken by stakeholders operating in the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor.
• A technical study of the New Westminster Rail Bridge was completed to evaluate the useful life of the existing bridge, and estimate the rail demand and capacity of the bridge by 2030.

Performance Measures

• The department initiated the next phase of the Asia-Pacific Gateway Performance Table to focus on improved efficiency of the supply chains for both containers and bulk commodities, particularly through development of performance indicators.

Value Added

• The department promoted Canada’s tax and duty advantages for international trade (including foreign trade zone-type programs) to public- and private-sector stakeholders, and announced the waiver of the 25 percent duty on imports of all general cargo vessels and tankers.

Expert Outreach through a Contribution Agreement to the Sauder School of Business, British Columbia

• The department funded the second International Conference on Gateways and Corridors in November 2010, attracting renowned experts and practitioners from Canada and abroad. Conference discussions provided new perspectives on key issues that will inform the further development of Canada’s Gateway strategies, such as green supply chains; innovation; changing global shipping routes; building international relationships; and developing export opportunities.

Canada-China Collaboration on Transportation and Trade Logistics:

• Two missions to China by the Minister for the Asia-Pacific Gateway in 2010:
  1. Beijing, Shanghai (May 2010); and
  2. Guangzhou, Hong Kong (November 2010)
• The Policy Dialogue on Trade Logistics in Suzhou, China (June 2010)
• The Joint Research Program on Advanced Technology Applications and Supply Chain Management (Terms of Reference for the container tracking study, an individual project under the Joint Research Program, January 2011); and
• A contribution agreement with the Supply Chain & Logistics Association Canada, for an exchange of trade logistics professionals (supported the incoming Chinese delegation in May 2010 and the Supply Chain & Logistics Association Canada-led delegation to China in November 2010).

APEC Port Services Network

• Transport Canada’s continued leadership of the APEC Port Services Network, including:
  1. the third annual APEC Port Services Network meeting in Shanghai in September 2010, where Canada was again re-elected to the presidency of the APEC Port Services Network; and
  2. a one-day workshop on free trade zones at ports, providing Canada with the opportunity to highlight Canada’s gateways and how Canada’s highly competitive tax and duty deferral regimes allowed companies engaged in export-oriented activities to enjoy free trade zone-type advantages from any location in Canada.

International Outreach and Engagement

• Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative business mission to Vietnam (November 2010); and
• Joint Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative ministerial events with British Columbia in Guangzhou and Hong Kong (November 2010)

Public Engagement and Awareness

The department:

• launched a re-vamped Asia-Pacific Gateway website and interactive map to provide updates on the projects and initiative (October 2010);
• launched a series of Pacific Gateway video vignettes ;
• updated Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative background materials and distributed Gateway Corridor News, Spring 2010 edition, an e-news update from the minister on the Asia-Pacific Gateway to multiple domestic and international stakeholders; and
• released a report to Canadians on the progress of the initiative entitled Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative Reaches a Milestone (October 2010).

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Transport Canada	1.2 — Gateway and Corridors	Coordination and Management	$6.5	$1.3	$1.0	Continued interdepartmental coordination and management of the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative	Transport Canada coordinated and integrated policy within Transport Canada and across federal departments through the internal and interdepartmental steering committees.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Transport Canada	1.2 — Gateway and Corridors	Fast-Track Process	$2.3	$0		N/A (Completed in 2007-2008)	N/A

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada	International Commerce — Managing and delivering commerce services and advice to Canadian business	Marketing the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative	$7.0	$1.0	$0.7	Expected Results for International Commerce	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for Marketing the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative are listed below.

Business-to-Business Outreach

• Transport Canada facilitated four business-to-business missions:
  1. Memphis, Atlanta, Nashville (June 2010);
  2. Chicago (November 2010);
  3. New York/New Jersey (February 2011); and
  4. Chicago and Minneapolis (March 2011).

Participation at Key Industry Events

• The department promoted the Gateway and Corridor at four key industry events:
  1. Eye for Transport (Atlanta, June 2010);
  2. TIACA Air Cargo Forum (Amsterdam, November 2010);
  3. World Route Development Forum (Vancouver, September 2010); and
  4. Retail Industry Leaders Association (February 2011).

International Media Programs

• The department hosted three media missions from:
  1. Japan;
  2. China; and
  3. the U.S.

Outgoing Missions

• The department supported two outgoing missions for the Honourable Stockwell Day, Minister responsible for the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor:
  1. China and Japan (May 2010); and
  2. Hong Kong, China and Vietnam (November 2010).

Transport Canada supported the outgoing mission to Asia of Minister Shirley Bond, B.C. Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, in November 2010.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Canada Border Services Agency	Canadian Importing and Exporting Community	Marine Container Inspection Operation at the Port of Prince Rupert	$28.0	$0	$0	N/A (Completed in 2009-2010)	N/A

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Parks Canada	Throughway management	Banff Trans-Canada Highway Twinning	$37.0	$0	$0	N/A (Completed in 2009-2010)	N/A

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Western Economic Diversification	Business development and entrepreneurship	Seizing the Gateway Opportunity	$0.4	$0	$0	N/A (Completed in 2008-2009)	N/A
		Dredging the Fraser River	$4.0	$0	$0	N/A (Completed in 2007-2008)	N/A

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Human Resources and Skills Development Canada	Skills and Labour Pressure	Asia-Pacific Gateway Skills Table	$3.0	$0.6	$1.1	Expected Results for the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Skills Table	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for the Asia-Pacific Gateway Skills Table are listed below.

Six projects are underway to date. Project activities include:

• customizing and updating industry-certified programs in response to workplace skills requirements;
• establishing skills/competencies profiles and workplace training to support incorporation of the skills;
• developing skills and competency models for supervisors/forepersons;
• customizing an human resources guide and tool kit, and delivering workshops to small and medium enterprises;
• developing industry and project-based labour market information; and
• comparative analysis of international best practices in gateway industries.

The department continued to foster partnerships with National Sector Councils (e.g., Supply Chain, Trucking) that help develop projects to support the aboriginal labour market and coordinate labour demand forecasts with influence from regional labour market information data.

The department experienced continued provincial support, at the government and private level, to coordinate and support delivery of provincial workforce training initiatives targeting gateways sectors.

The department fostered a stronger understanding of labour requirements through creation of an online industry human resources clearinghouse and inventory of Asia-Pacific Gateway labour market information and industry-based training resources.

Total Allocation For All Federal Partners (from Start to End Date) ($000s)	Total Planned Spending for All Federal Partners for 2010-2011 ($000s)
$1,045,000*	$250,007

*Includes $1,001 million of core Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative funding, as well as a transfer of $44 million from the Mountain Pine Beetle Fund to the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative Transportation Infrastructure Fund.

Comments on Variances: The variance under the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative program resulted from delays in project design, approval and the start of construction; the need to secure additional funding partners; delays in finalizing the contribution agreements; and, finally, the need to undertake due diligence.

Results to be achieved by non-federal partners (if applicable): N/A

Contact information: Paul Sandhar-Cruz, Director, Pacific Gateway Coordination, Transport Canada, 613-949-0654, paul.sandhar-cruz@tc.gc.ca

---

[1] An error has been identified in the 2010-2011 Report on Plans and Priorities under the Horizontal Initiatives table for the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative. Transport Canada reports on planned spending for 2010-2011 as $3,200. This amount includes the figures already disclosed under the sections for Foreign Affairs and International Trade, and Human Resources and Skills Development Canada. Federal Department: Transport Canada should report Transport Canada numbers only and therefore planned spending for 2010-2011 is $1,995. Additionally, total allocation from start to end date should be reported as $12,348 and not $12,650.

Name of Horizontal Initiative: Security and Public Safety for the 2010 G-8 and G-20 Summits

Start Date: April 1, 2009

End Date: March 31, 2011

Total Departmental Funding Allocation (from start date to end date): Approximately $1 million

Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement): The Royal Canadian Mounted Police was the federal government lead for G-8/G-20 security planning. Transport Canada worked with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police-led G-8/G-20 Integrated Security Unit, and other federal government departments and agencies, to ensure transportation at the summits was safe and secure. The department coordinated with the RCMP/Integrated Security Unit, and other federal organizations to develop integrated security plans and modify existing transportation plans to enhance transportation safety and security during the summits.

Surface, aviation and marine transportation were key components of the safety and security planning for the G-8/G-20 meetings. Prior to and during the summits, Transport Canada provided services in three key areas:

• Planning: Support to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police planning initiatives for the G-8 and G-20 summits (including risk assessments, regulatory development, establishment of restricted airspace and participation in Royal Canadian Mounted Police operations centres).
• Oversight and Security Promotion: Oversight and compliance verification of modal-specific G-8 and G-20 security enhancements requested by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (including air passenger screening, as well as rail, aviation, marine or surface G-8- and G-20-specific enhancements as requested by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police) and industry outreach to promote voluntary compliance and build industry capacity to enhance security.
• Drills and Exercises: Emergency preparedness development, planning and implementation of exercises (including preparation for and participation in the Royal Canadian Mounted Police symposiums, Trillium Sentry and Guardian).

Governance Structure(s): There were a number of interdepartmental and intradepartmental committees and working groups, for example the Deputy Ministers Working Group that was comprised of the respective security departments and agencies to facilitate an integrated federal approach to security.

Within Transport Canada, there was the Vancouver 2010 Olympic and Summits Steering Committee that was established to provide guidance for and approval of the overall planning efforts of the safety and security functions. The steering committee was responsible for approving all Transport Canada plans (including contributions to Royal Canadian Mounted Police plans), budgetary strategy, defining and realizing benefits, and monitoring risks, quality and timeliness.

There was also the National Events Transportation Working Group that was responsible for coordinating, sponsoring and promoting transportation safety and security strategies and activities intended to reduce — to as low a level as reasonably practicable — the multimodal transportation safety and security risks associated with the G-8 and G-20 summits.

Finally, Transport Canada put in place the Special Events Secretariat that provided departmental coordination and represented the department throughout the planning process with various stakeholders.

Federal Partners	Federal Partner Program Activity	Names of Programs for Federal Partners	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date)	2010-11 ($ millions)
				Planned Spending	Actual Spending	Expected Results	Results Achieved
Transport Canada	Surface and Intermodal Security	a) Safe and Secure G-8 and G-20 Summits c) Effective Land Security d) Effective Air Security e) Effective Marine Security f) Effective Intelligence h) Effective Operational Support i) Effective Information Technology	$1.1	$0.6	$0.4	New program	Results Achieved in 2010-2011 for G-8 and G-20 Events are listed below.
	Internal Services		$0.1	$0.1	$0.1
Total					$1.2	$0.7	$0.5

a) Transport Canada worked closely with other federal departments and agencies involved in safety and security during the G-8 summit and the G-20 summit. Transport Canada contributed to Safe and Secure Summits by exercising its leadership and its legislative/regulatory powers relating to the transportation system.

c, d, e) A very high level of compliance in all modes was experienced during the summits. Any non-compliance was minor and was easily resolved with no impact on the security and/or safety of the summits.

f) No issues were reported that affected the flow of information between the Joint Intelligence Group and Transport Canada.

h) Operations and Coordination centres were staffed with embedded personnel as required.
Timely and accurate information flowed between Transport Canada and the Integrated Security Unit.

i) Information technology service calls were resolved in a timely manner.

Comments on Variances: There was a reduction in the level of some services provided (determined as not required), resulting in lower labour costs.

Contact information: Luc Brisebois, Director, Emergency Preparedness, Safety and Security, Transport Canada, 613-947-5076, luc.brisebois@tc.gc.ca