This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
Supplementary Information (Tables)
By virtue of its mandate, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) is responsible for collecting tax revenue as described earlier in the Audited Financial Statements – Administered Activities. Similar to other government departments and agencies, the CRA also collects non-tax revenue that includes interest, penalties and other charges applied under the Customs, Excise/GST and Taxation laws as well as revenues from the refund of previous years’ expenditures and from the provision of goods and non-tax services. As detailed below, non-tax revenues are further divided between respendable and non-respendable. Respendable non-tax revenues are received by the CRA for services provided to individuals or organisations that have not been funded by Parliament, e.g., costs recovered under Tax Collection Agreements with the provinces. Non-respendable non-tax revenues are those received by the CRA for which the Agency does not have the authority to re-spend, e.g., recovery of employee benefits.
Table 1.1 Respendable Non-Tax Revenue
Ruling Fees[Footnote 1]
|
|||||||
Administration of Provincial Programs[Footnote
2]
|
|||||||
Services to Other Government Departments (OGD)[Footnote 3]
|
|||||||
Less: Amounts Recovered on behalf of
OGDs[Footnote 4]
|
|||||||
Table 1.2 Non-Respendable Non-Tax Revenue1
Table 2.1 a) User Fees Act (UFA) – Advance Income Tax Ruling Fee |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance Standard[Footnote 1]
|
The key service standard target is to issue advance income tax rulings
to taxpayers within an average of 60 calendar days of receipt of all essential information. The Income Tax
Rulings Directorate’s ( ITRD’s) Quality Management
System requires a telephone acknowledgement of receipt of the request within 24 business hours. Within 14
days, a review of the file for completeness is conducted and an acknowledgement letter, complete with a
contact name and request for any missing information (if required) is sent to the client. The client is
again contacted by telephone when the file is assigned for processing. Where a delay is unavoidable, clients
are contacted and delays are discussed with them.
|
||||
Performance Results[Footnote
1]
|
|||||
For the past few years,
ITRD has been unable to meet its published service
standard for advance income tax rulings. Contributing factors were the increased complexity of files, diminished
resources, and staff attrition. ITRD has recently
compiled a framework to perform a comprehensive study of its performance in this area with a view towards
taking the necessary steps in gradually moving back towards its published service standard.
|
Table 2.1 b) Policy on Service Standards for External Fees – Advance Income Tax Ruling Fee |
|
---|---|
Service Standard[Footnote 1]
|
The key service standard target is to issue advance income tax rulings
to taxpayers within an average of 60 calendar days of receipt of all essential information. The Income Tax
Rulings Directorate’s ( ITRD’s) Quality Management
System requires a telephone acknowledgement of receipt of the request within 24 business hours. Within 14
days, a review of the file for completeness is conducted and an acknowledgement letter, complete with a
contact name and request for any missing information (if required) is sent to the client. The client is
again contacted by telephone when the file is assigned for processing. Where a delay is unavoidable, clients
are contacted and delays are discussed with them.
|
Performance Results[Footnote
1]
|
|
Client satisfaction questionnaires were sent out to all advance income
tax ruling clients for a two-year period from October 2002 through October 2004. At that time, responding
clients from this group indicated a satisfaction rate in excess of 95%. More recently, client feedback has
been received informally during ITRD’s attendance
at major tax conferences. Generally, there is a very high degree of satisfaction with the quality of advance
income tax rulings although the clients would like to receive them faster.
|
|
For the past few years,
ITRD has been unable to meet its published service
standard for advance income tax rulings. Contributing factors were the increased complexity of files, diminished
resources, and staff attrition. ITRD has recently
compiled a framework to perform a comprehensive study of its performance in this area with a view towards
taking the necessary steps in gradually moving back towards its published service standard.
|
Table 2.2 a) User Fees Act (UFA) – Taxation Statistical Analyses and Data Processing Fee |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance Standard[Footnote 1]
|
|||||
Performance Results[Footnote
1]
|
|||||
Table 2.2 b) Policy on Service Standards for External Fees – Taxation Statistical Analyses and Data Processing Fee |
|
---|---|
Service Standard[Footnote 1]
|
|
Performance Results[Footnote
1]
|
|
Table 2.3 a) User Fees Act (UFA) – Access to Information Processing Fee |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance Standard[Footnote 1]
|
|||||
Performance Results[Footnote
1]
|
|||||
Table 2.3 b) Policy on Service Standards for External Fees – Access to Information Processing Fee |
|
---|---|
Service Standard[Footnote 1]
|
|
Performance Results[Footnote
1]
|
|
GOL – My Business Account[Footnote 1]
|
||||||
GST/HST Redesign[Footnote 1]
|
||||||
Compliance Systems Redesign[Footnote 2]
|
||||||
Taxpayer Relief Registry Redesign project[Footnote 1]
|
||||||
Agency Classification Standard[Footnote 1]
|
||||||
Two transfer payment programs with payments in excess of $5M were administered by the Agency in 2008-2009:
Table 5.1 Children’s Special Allowance Payments (CSA) (Statutory) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Start Date: Aug. 28, 1995[Footnote 1]
|
||||||
Tax-free monthly payments made to agencies and foster parents who
are licensed by provincial or federal governments to provide for the care and education of children under
the age of 18 who physically reside in Canada and who are not in the care of their parents.
CSA payments are equivalent to Canada Child Tax
Benefit payments. CSA payments are governed by the
Children’s Special Allowances Act which provides that this allowance be paid out of the Consolidated
Revenue Fund.
|
||||||
2008-2009[Footnote 2]
|
||||||
Table 5.2 Payments to Provinces under the Softwood Lumber Products Export Charge Act, 2006 (Statutory) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The export charge, to be levied by Canada on exports of softwood
lumber products to the United States, is collected and administered by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) with support from the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade
(DFAIT) on behalf of the
provinces. Under the Softwood Lumber Products Export Charge Act, 2006 (Act), the
CRA is responsible for making disbursements to the provinces
of a portion of the charge collected over the course of the application of the Softwood Lumber Agreement,
2006. These payments are reduced by several factors: refunds paid to the industry, costs for the administration
and implementation of the Agreement and the Act as well as the costs incurred for certain litigation resulting
from the Agreement or Act. The Act applies to the following regions: BC
Interior, BC Coastal, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario
and Quebec. Exports from the remaining provinces and territories are excluded.
|
||||||
The first payment covering revenues collected, minus costs for the
period between the entry into force on October 12, 2006 and September 30, 2007, was made to the provinces
on January 11, 2008. A second payment was made on March 31, 2008 covering the calendar quarter from October
1, 2007 to December 31, 2007. Payments will continue on a quarterly basis until the termination of the Agreement,
unless lumber market prices increase to the point where no export charge is applicable for that period.
|
||||||
2008-2009[Footnote 1]
|
||||||
Activities scheduled for completion in 2008-2009 that contributed
to the Federal SD Goal(s) and/or Green Government Operations
(GGO) Government-wide Target(s)[Footnote 1] below are noted explicitly in the “Department’s Expected Results”
column.
|
||||
|
||||
The CRA developed
a methodology to convert solid waste diversion rates into GHG
emissions. Based on the 2007 solid waste audit results, the CRA
avoided the generation of approximately 2,000 tonnes of Co2 equivalents by diverting 2,700 tonnes of solid
waste from landfill. Further analysis determined that the general methodology was suitable for application
to the next round of solid waste audits that is scheduled in 2009-2010.
|
||||
Within CRA facilities,
reduction and reuse programs include the Second Life Paper program, recycling centres for office supplies,
reusable mugs, green meetings, and green office moves. In order to formalize these activities, the
CRA developed a Reduction & Reuse toolkit. The toolkit,
which will be completed in 2009-2010, will assist employees to measure results from reduction and reuse
programs. In the meantime, the Agency continued to provide employees with information to implement these
initiatives.
|
||||
The draft management plan to green the procurement of Information
Technology (IT) equipment was finalized during the period. The Agency incorporated environmental criteria
into the CRA national contract for end-user devices (laptops,
desktops, servers and monitors). The environmental criteria include the requirement that end-user devices
meet an internationally recognized green certification program for IT equipment. The management program
for green procurement for 2009-2010 also included the greening of IT hardware equipment.
|
||||
The Agency introduced a new electronic-procurement tool, Synergy.
The tool is an integrated suite of software applications specifically designed to automate the purchasing
process. It enables the Agency to eliminate duplication, reduce administrative and paper burdens, increase
process efficiencies; and allows for better tracking of green procurement performance.
Internal collaboration ensured that green products that are available
within Synergy are identified and labelled; and that its reporting capacity meets the Agency's green procurement
reporting requirements. An added benefit is Synergy's improved accessibility to timely reporting. Analysis
is ongoing to estimate paper savings resulting from these efficiencies.
|
||||
The Agency conducted a scan of
CRA, industry, and other government departmental practices
related to the procurement of services. A standard definition for green services was developed, along with
criteria for identifying and procuring green services. The report is being used as a tool to green
CRA service contracts.
|
||||
1. General communications on sustainable business travel:
The CRA updated the Transportation section within the
SD Website to include information on videoconferencing,
teleconferencing, and the sustainable travel provisions contained in the
CRA Travel Policy.
2. Promotion of the Sustainable Business Travel (SBT) course: The
SBT course was finalized, and an implementation plan
drafted. The plan outlines a structured approach for delivering the course to frequent travellers within
the Agency.
There were 1,361 hits on the Business Travel Web page and 2,977 hits
on the main Transportation Web page on the SD Website
by CRA employees during 2008-2009.
|
||||
During the period, the CRA
acquired ten vehicles. Five were alternative transportation fuel (ATF) capable, and the other five were
conventional fuel vehicles due to operational requirements. On March 31, 2009, the
CRA owned/leased 94 vehicles - 13 (14%) were hybrids and
27 (29%) were ATF capable.
|
||||
The Agency finalized the draft
CRA Fleet Manager's Handbook, and
CRA Fleet Directives and Procedures. Both policy instruments
promote the use of Ethanol-10 fuel in CRA fleet vehicles,
where feasible.
|
||||
The Agency selected six facilities to implement energy conservation
initiatives. To establish a baseline measure of energy use for each facility, the Agency conducted equipment
inventories in five of the six facilities. The remaining inventory will be completed in early 2009. Further
analysis of the inventories is required to establish the energy use baselines.
|
||||
The CRA liaised
with PWGSC's Office of Greening
of Government Operations (OGGO),
as they lead the interdepartmental effort to streamline the environmentally responsible disposal of electronic
waste. The plans include enhancements to federal programs for recycling and disposal of electronic waste
such as Computers for Schools, and Crown Assets disposal centres. The Agency will conduct a more detailed
review of its IT disposal practices in 2009-2010 to better inform its management plan for IT hardware and
software disposal.
|
||||
2. Summary of initiatives to incorporate environmental performance
considerations in procurement decision-making processes:
The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) continues to implement concrete measures to incorporate environmental performance
considerations in procurement decision-making processes. These measures, which include policy support, technology
enhancements, and training, support the Government of Canada's Green Procurement Policy. This is realised
through the framework established in the CRA Sustainable
Development (SD) Strategy 2007-2010, and the annual Environmental
Management Program (EMP) for Green Procurement.
The CRA established
its own in-house Green Procurement Guidelines. These guidelines, which support the Government of Canada's
Green Procurement Policy, apply to the procurement of goods and services and are intended to help reduce
the environmental impacts of CRA operations. They also
promote environmental stewardship by integrating environmental performance considerations in the procurement
process. The guidelines apply to all CRA employees.
The Agency continues to include sustainable development clauses and
environmental specifications in all new strategic sourcing contracts. These national procurement instruments
establish long-term agreements with vendors to supply goods and/or services on a best value basis. They
are used by all CRA employees and they support the purchase
of greener products and services.
The Agency continues to improve the efficiency of its procurement
processes by integrating SD and environmental considerations
into existing procurement tools. The CRA online purchasing
systems (WBRO/Synergy), for example, reduce paperwork requirements, identify environmentally friendly product
options, and enable accurate tracking of CRA green procurement
performance.
|
Overall, CRA senior
management continued to demonstrate strong support for sustainable development and green procurement. Within
the Executive Cadre (EC), 97% of its members included SD
measures in their performance agreements. Managers and functional heads also include
SD measurement criteria in their core performance expectations.
SD measurement criteria for managers include green procurement.
In 2008-2009, all five, or 100%, of strategic sourcing contracts
issued contained environmental specifications/criteria. These included:
|
The CRA's
SD Strategy for 2007-2010 has established the following
targets related to green procurement:
Under the framework outlined in the Agency's
SD Strategy for 2007-2010 and annual
EMP for Green Procurement, the
CRA continues to explore new ways to improve efficiency,
conserve resources, and implement environmentally responsible procurement practices. The activities included
in the CRA's SD
National Action Plan (2007-2010) that support green procurement are as follows:
Activity 1.1.2.1: Include
SD clauses and environmental specifications in all new
strategic sourcing contracts.
Activity 1.1.2.2: Develop a management plan to expand the scope of
green procurement to include IT hardware and software.
Activity 1.1.2.3: Review and improve the efficiency of the
CRA procurement process, such as the bidding process, ordering
systems, e-capabilities, green procurement tracking, and any new contracting tools, when working with suppliers.
Activity 1.1.2.5: Implement a Printer Consolidation Strategy that
will establish appropriate user-to-printer ratios and update acquisition, renewal, and disposal policies
and procedures to achieve these ratios.
Activity 1.1.2 6: Provide green procurement training to 100% of procurement
officers and their managers.
Through the successful completion of the above activities, the
CRA anticipates it will meet its green procurement targets,
increase SD and green procurement awareness and knowledge
among employees, ensure the systematic inclusion of sustainable development and environmental consideration
in procurement decision-making processes, and contribute to more efficient resource use.
|
In 2008-2009, 27.5% ($9,407,187) of products purchased through
CRA's online purchasing systems (WBRO/Synergy) were green
.[Footnote 1]
The CRA augmented
the proportion of the CRA fleet vehicles that is considered
green (hybrids and alternative fuel vehicles) to 42.6% - an increase of 10% over 2007-2008.
The Agency continued to reduce the amount of office paper bought.
By leveraging technology and communicating to employees, in 2008-2009, each
CRA employee used an average of 5,385 sheets of office
paper in their job. This is down from a recorded high of 7,399 sheets of office paper used per employee
in 2003-2004.
|
(a) It is important to note, however, that in fiscal year 2007-2008*,
the House of Commons' Standing Committee on Public Accounts (referred to in Parliament as "PACP") undertook initiatives related to the
practice of seeking "follow-up" information (referred to herein as 'status reports') further to Auditor
General Reports previously tabled in Parliament. Within this framework, on an exceptional basis, the
PACP Chair contacted
the CRA via written correspondence in order to obtain current
status reports to GRs previously tabled with
PACP. These status reports
are not GRs per se, but as they stem from previous GRs they have been included below.
(* NB: As the committee's letter was issued during fiscal year 2007-2008,
this information was previously included in the 2007-2008 Canada Revenue Agency Annual Report to Parliament.)
On March 5, 2009, the Chair of
PACP presented the Fifth
Report from the Subcommittee on Agenda and
PACP agreed to the following
recommendation:
"That all departments and agencies of the federal government that
have been subject to a performance audit by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada provide a detailed
action plan to address the audit findings and recommendations - including specific actions, timelines for
their completion and responsible individuals - to the Public Accounts Committee and the Office of the Auditor
General of Canada within six months of the audit being tabled in the House of Commons; and that departments
and agencies that are invited to appear before the Public Accounts Committee to discuss the findings of
an audit should, when feasible, provide an action plan to the Committee prior to the hearing."
|
In 2008-2009, various Parliamentary Committees did table reports
wherein the CRA is mentioned. These include:
The Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology (INDU),
Second Report: Study of a Crisis in the Auto Sector in Canada (presented to the House on March 31, 2009).
|
Recommendation 2: "The Canada Revenue Agency modify its tax revenue
estimation methodology by 30 September 2008. If this cannot be done by this date, the Canada Revenue Agency
should explain to the Public Accounts Committee the reasons for the inability to meet this deadline and
provide the Committee with a date by which this modification will be done."
http://www2.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?DocId=3320946&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=39&Ses=2
|