This page has been archived.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
The Honourable Tony Clement, M.P.
Minister of Health
SECTION II – ANALYSIS BY STRATEGIC OUTCOME AND KEY PROGRAM
SECTION III – SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
SECTION IV – OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST
I am pleased to present the Public Health Agency of Canada’s Performance Report for 2006-07. Health and access to a strong and effective health care system continue to be among the highest priorities for Canadians. These priorities are shared by Canada’s New Government, and they continue to be my paramount concerns as Minister of Health.
I recognize the key contributions of the Agency and its deputy, the Chief Public Health Officer, in improving public health in Canada. This is why my first piece of federal legislation was the introduction of The Public Health Agency of Canada Act. I was proud to see the Act approved by Parliament and entered into force in December 2006, as it reaffirmed the Government of Canada’s commitment to public health. The Agency enhances the federal government’s ability to plan for and respond to public health emergencies, such as SARS or pandemic influenza; works to reduce disease and injury; and provides ongoing leadership in strengthening the public health infrastructure in Canada. This Performance Report shows the significant achievements made by the Agency during 2006-07, its second full year of operation.
Guaranteeing patient wait times remains one of our government’s highest priorities. Reducing the burden on the health care system by improving overall public health continues to be one of the most effective ways of achieving this goal. Because major chronic diseases share common risk factors, Canada’s New Government, with the support of the Public Health Agency and in collaboration with the provinces, territories and key stakeholders, continued its work to address health promotion and the prevention and control of chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes and cardiovascular disease, through a combination of integrated and disease specific strategies and programs. Budget 2007 provided $300 million over three years to support provinces and territories to launch human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programs targeting cervical cancer. For this the Agency took the leadership role in coordinating Canada’s first collaborative planning exercise for immunization programs.
In February 2007 the Prime Minister’s announcement of the Canadian HIV Vaccine Initiative reflected the Agency’s contribution to worldwide efforts to develop safe and effective HIV vaccines. The Agency’s partners in the Initiative include Health Canada, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Canadian International Development Agency, Industry Canada, and
the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Work towards HIV vaccines complements the Agency’s other HIV initiatives such as the AIDS Community Action Program which supported 148 beneficial projects across Canada.
The Agency helped our government provide Canadians with safe and secure communities by effectively reducing the threat of infectious diseases. In particular, the Public Health Agency took a leadership role in updating and publishing the updated Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan for the Health Sector in December 2006, in collaboration with federal partners and the provinces and
territories. This plan provides guidance on the measures and systems that will be needed to respond to a pandemic. Drawing on an investment of $1 billion from the 2006 Budget, the Agency and its partner federal departments continued to strengthen the plan and to enhance important initiatives including prevention, early warning, vaccines, antivirals, and critical science.
In collaboration with a number of countries and international organizations, the Agency assisted the Kenyan Ministry of Health in containing an outbreak of Rift Valley Fever that was responsible for a large number of human and animal deaths. In January 2007 five scientists and a mobile lab from the Agency were deployed on a mission which helped Kenya manage this deadly disease. Experiences like this one will be beneficial in preparing for possible public health emergencies in Canada.
While the Agency led federal efforts to prevent disease and injury and to promote and protect national and international public health, it also continued to support this government’s vision and direction on accountability and efficiency in all government operations and initiatives.
In support of a stronger public health system in Canada and around the world, and in moving forward on fulfilling our government’s priority of improving health and access to health care for Canadians, I am proud to report on the performance of the Public Health Agency of Canada during 2006-07.
The Honourable Tony Clement
Minister of Health
The Public Health Agency of Canada exists to strengthen the Government of Canada’s ability to protect the health and safety of Canadians, and to provide a national focal point to lead efforts in the advancement of public health both nationally and internationally. I am pleased to take part in this accounting to Parliament and the Canadian public of the Agency’s work over 2006-07.
It is the role of the Chief Public Health Officer of Canada to report on matters relating to public health and to share information and best practices with governments, public health authorities and others in the health field, both within Canada and internationally. It is also the Chief Public Health Officer’s responsibility to speak to Canadians as a credible and trusted voice on public health issues, and to advise the Minister of Health on matters of public health and on the operations of the Public Health Agency.
Because public health is complex, success requires a comprehensive team approach that brings in partners from across all sectors of society. The Agency actively engages many partners, including Health Canada and the rest of the health portfolio, other federal departments, the provinces and territories, stakeholders, and non-governmental organizations to promote and protect the health of Canadians.
Public health often receives its greatest attention during times of crisis, and one of the Agency’s highest priorities is to prepare and plan for such events, including a potential influenza pandemic. The money provided to the Public Health Agency from the $1 billion investment in pandemic preparedness initiated in Budget 2006 enabled the Agency to increase collaboration with its partners and to take additional steps to protect Canadians from public health emergencies. In co-operation with Public Safety Canada, the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, the Public Health Agency co-developed the North American Avian and Pandemic Influenza Plan with the United States and Mexico which outlines how the three countries will work together if needed. The Agency also played a key role in the development of a proposed Federal, Provincial, and Territorial Memorandum of Understanding on the Provision of Mutual Aid in Relation to Health Resources during an Emergency. In addition, the Agency continued collaboratively building an effective national emergency stockpile system of critical supplies including anti-viral drugs in the event of an influenza pandemic.
Public health is about keeping people healthy, which helps to ensure a solid foundation for a prosperous society. The Agency helps strengthen this foundation by ensuring that we, as a society, take steps to address health disparities. During 2006-07 the Agency provided financial support for initiatives across the country that increased community capacity to address factors affecting the health of vulnerable groups. Also, during 2006-07 the Agency contributed to and disseminated learnings from the World Health Organization’s Commission on Social Determinants of Health. In particular the Agency led the Commission’s Canadian Reference Group, a partnership involving federal government departments such as the Canadian International Development Agency, Health Canada and the International Development Research Centre, as well as provinces, territories, and non-governmental organizations.
The Agency also took concrete steps to improve the overall health and quality of life of Canadians through programs focused on healthy eating and physical activity, thereby addressing the health, social and economic burden of chronic disease in Canada.
To anticipate and respond to the immediate and future health needs of Canadians, the Agency developed Strategic Plan 2007-2012. This comprehensive plan promises to enhance the management and effective delivery of the Agency’s programs.
Through these and other measures, the Agency lived up to its mandate. It anticipated and prepared for threats to public health, carried out health surveillance, reported on diseases and preventable health risks, and used the best available tools to inform and advise Canadians on improving and protecting their health.
This Performance Report shows that the Agency, through its dedicated staff across the country, continued to move forward on fulfilling the vision of healthy Canadians and communities in a healthier world.
Dr. David Butler-Jones, M.D.
Chief Public Health Officer
I submit for tabling in Parliament the 2006-07 Departmental Performance Report (DPR) for the Public Health Agency of Canada. This document has been prepared based on the reporting principles contained in the Guide for the Preparation of Part III of the 2006-07 Estimates: Reports on Plans and Priorities and Departmental Performance Reports:
It reports finances based on approved numbers from the Estimates and the Public Accounts of Canada. Dr. David Butler-Jones, M.D. |
The 2006-07 Departmental Performance Report of the Public Health Agency of Canada (the Agency) is structured as follows:
After the messages from the Minister and the Chief Public Health Officer, and a statement confirming the validity of the information in this document, Section I discusses performance information, and presents a brief overview of the Agency’s reason for existence, including its mission, vision, mandate, role, structure, geographic locations and key collaborations and partnerships.
Section I then reports the overall financial and human resources utilized during the fiscal year, and presents a table summarizing resources used and progress on the six priorities set out in the Agency’s 2006-07 Report on Plans and Priorities.
An assessment is then provided of the Agency’s performance in the context of the operating environment - the key factors that have an impact on the way programs are delivered. How the Agency’s work links to Government of Canada outcome areas is then reviewed. Section I concludes by explaining the Agency’s progress against each of the six priorities for the year.
Section II, Analysis by Strategic Outcome and Key Program, provides more detailed information on resources used, activities undertaken and progress made.
Section III, Supplementary Information, provides detailed financial and operational information in the sequence and format specified by the Treasury Board Secretariat.
Section IV provides more organizational information, including information on strategic, business, and sustainable development planning, a detailed organization chart, a risk communications framework, and the new Program Activity Architecture adopted for 2007-08.
Included throughout the report are links to the Agency's website and to websites of external partners and other organizations. Readers are encouraged to visit these sites for additional information about the work of the Agency and our partners.
The Agency gathers and uses both financial and non-financial information for operational and reporting purposes. Financial performance information is carefully monitored to ensure financial commitments are met and expenditures accounted for. Performance information is used for making operational decisions and for communicating with stakeholders. When appropriate, evaluations are used to generate and/or confirm performance information; they are also used to create or amend policies and/or procedures and to renew or change program design.
The financial information at the heart of this report has been generated by the Finance and Administration Directorate, using the Agency’s financial management systems. These numbers are verified internally, and may be validated from time to time through external reviews and audits.
The non-financial performance information used in this report was gathered from multiple internal sources including the senior managers responsible for carrying out the commitments set out in the 2006-07 Report on Plans and Priorities. These managers report back on the actions taken and the results they have achieved. Through the departmental performance reporting process senior managers are held accountable to report back on the commitments made by the Agency for the previous year.
Canadians are among the healthiest people in the world. Two factors which contribute to Canadians’ high quality of life are their access to a modern and sustainable publicly-funded health care system and the existence of a strong public health system. The actions of the public health community are often not as apparent as those in the conventional health care system, because public health targets the entire population, working upstream to avoid potential problems and to deal with them as they occur. Public Health works to identify threats and risks to the health of Canadians at large, as opposed to health care, which focuses on individuals. While they are both part of the continuum of health, the emphasis in public health is prevention. By helping keep Canadians healthy, the Agency, in partnership with the public health community, not only improves health and quality of life, but can also relieve some of the pressure on the health care system, helping to constrain costs and lessen patient wait times.
Public health involves a range of players and partners engaging in initiatives that promote health, prevent and control both infectious and chronic diseases, support public health research and surveillance activities, and protect people from the consequences of health emergencies. In Canada, public health is a responsibility shared by the three levels of government, the private sector, the not-for-profit sector and health professionals such as family physicians. The Agency works closely with other federal departments and agencies, provinces and territories, and other stakeholders to keep Canadians healthy.
Events like the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003 demonstrated the need for Canada to have a national point of focus for public health issues. In response, the Public Health Agency of Canada was established on September 24, 2004, and Dr. David Butler-Jones was appointed as the country’s first Chief Public Health Officer. The creation of the Agency marked the beginning of a new approach to federal leadership, and to collaboration with the provinces and territories in the Government’s efforts to renew the public health system in Canada. On December 15, 2006, the Public Health Agency of Canada Act came into force, providing a statutory basis for the Agency. The Act formally establishes the position of the Chief Public Health Officer (CPHO) and recognizes his unique dual role as deputy head of the Agency and as Canada’s lead public health professional:
The CPHO is also Canada’s lead public health professional, with demonstrated expertise and leadership in this field. For this reason, the CPHO has the legislated authority to communicate directly with Canadians and to prepare and publish reports on any public health issue. He is also required to submit to the Minister of Health, for tabling in Parliament, an annual report on the state of public health in Canada. By providing the CPHO with authority to speak out on public health matters and ensuring that he or she has strong qualifications in the field of public health, the Public Health Agency of Canada Act protects the CPHO’s credibility.
The role of the Agency can be summed up as follows:
The Agency is mandated to work in collaboration with its partners to lead federal efforts and to mobilize pan-Canadian action in preventing disease and injury, and to promote and protect national and international public health by:
The Agency at a Glance |
|
Type of Organization |
Federal Agency, funded by Parliament |
Mission |
To promote and protect the health of Canadians through leadership, partnership, innovation and action in public health |
Vision |
Healthy Canadians and communities in a healthier world |
Strategic Outcome for reporting period |
Healthier Population by Promoting Health and Preventing Disease and Injury |
Strategic Outcome for 2007-08 |
Healthier Canadians and a stronger public health capacity |
Government of Canada Outcome Directly Supported |
Healthy Canadians |
Enabling legislation |
Public Health Agency of Canada Act |
Acts and Regulations Administered |
The Quarantine Act |
Key Activities |
|
Reporting to Parliament |
The Agency reports to Parliament through the Minister of Health |
The following organization chart depicts how the Agency is structured within the Federal Health Portfolio.
To maintain the knowledge and skills needed to develop and deliver the public health advice and tools required by Canadians, the Agency calls upon the efforts of public health professionals, scientists, technicians, communicators, administrators, and policy analysts and planners. These employees work across Canada in a wide range of operational, scientific, technical and administrative positions.
The largest concentration of employees is in the National Capital Region. The head office in Winnipeg forms a second pillar of expertise. In times of a national health emergency, the Emergency Operations Centre based in both in Ottawa and Winnipeg can be utilized to manage the crisis.
The Public Health Agency of Canada recognizes the need to have a strong presence throughout the country to connect with provincial and territorial governments, federal departments, academia, voluntary organizations and citizens. Outside of Winnipeg and the National Capital Region, the Agency’s Canada-wide infrastructure consists of 16 locations in six Regions: British Columbia & Yukon, Alberta & Northwest Territories, Manitoba & Saskatchewan, Ontario & Nunavut, Quebec, and AtlanticSome Agency programs are delivered to the Yukon, Nunavut and the Northwest Territories through Health Canada’s Northern Region office under an interdepartmental agreement. The Agency’s Regional Offices promote integrated action on public health throughout the country. Working in partnerships that cross sectors and jurisdictions, staff in these offices facilitate collaboration on national priorities, building on resources at the regional, provincial and district levels.
The Agency operates specialized research laboratories in several locations across Canada. The Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health in Winnipeg houses the Agency's state-of-the-art National Microbiology Laboratory which is one of the world’s high containment research laboratories. The Agency's Laboratory for Foodborne Zoonoses, which studies the risks to human health from diseases arising from the interface between animals, humans and the environment, is headquartered in Guelph, Ontario and maintains units in St. Hyacinthe, Quebec and Lethbridge, Alberta.
The following map shows where the Agency’s staff, offices and laboratories are located (employee numbers are as of March 31, 2007):
Most public health activities, including those performed by the Agency, involve collaboration and partnership with the provinces and territories, other federal departments, health organizations, professional organizations, academia, the private and not-for-profit sectors and/or other stakeholders. This creates challenges for performance measurement, as positive health outcomes and trends usually reflect the success of joint efforts by multiple partners.
The Government of Canada’s Health Portfolio consists of approximately 11,700 employees and an annual budget of $4.6 billion. The Agency works closely with the other members of the Health Portfolio, as well as other federal departments and agencies whose work has an impact on public health. Key federal departments and agencies that the Agency works with include:
The Government of Canada’s Health Portfolio
For more information see: |
|
Other Government of Canada Partners
|
Planned Spending | Total Authorities | Actual Spending |
$629.7 million | $536.2 million* | $510.8 million** |
* The $93.5 million difference between planned spending and authorities is mainly due to the deferment of $44 million in funding for Avian and Pandemic Influenza Preparedness to subsequent fiscal years, and expected funding of $51 million for Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control not flowing through the Agency.
** Actual spending was $25.4 million lower than total authorities primarily due to capacity and technical constraints which impeded the full utilization of approved resources. Of the 25.4 million, operating expenditure accounted for $20.5 million and transfer payments $4.9 million.
Planned | Actual | Difference |
2,119 | 2,050 | 69 |
*To properly include persons employed for part of the year and/or employed part time in a measure showing average employment over the year, 'full-time equivalent' is calculated based on days worked . The Agency began the fiscal year with approximately 1,968 employees and ended it with approximately 2,157.
The following table provides a “report card” of progress on each priority for 2006-07, and shows the financial resources planned and spent.
Performance and spending by priority 2006-07 | ||||
Strategic Outcome: Healthier Population by Promoting Health and Preventing Disease and Injury Program Activity: Population and Public Health |
||||
Priority | Expected Results | Performance Status | Planned Spending ($ millions) |
Actual Spending ($ millions) |
#1: |
Enhanced strategies and programs for the prevention and control of infectious disease |
Successfully met |
169.6 |
124.2* * Actual spending was $45.4 million less than plan primarily due to deferment of $44.1 million Avian and Pandemic Influenza Preparedness funding to subsequent fiscal years. |
#2: |
Enhanced strategies and programs for to promote health and prevent and control chronic disease and injury |
Successfully met |
179.9 |
127.4 * * Actual spending was $52.5 million less than planned mainly due to expected funding of $51 million for Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control not flowing through the Agency. |
#3 : |
Increased preparedness for and ability to respond to public health emergencies, including pandemic influenza |
Successfully met |
55.9 |
55.1
|
#4: |
Stronger public health capacity |
Successfully met |
83.8 |
84.0
|
#5: |
Advanced action on the determinants of health |
Successfully met |
70.6 |
51.2 **
|
#6: |
Increased Agency internal capacity and ability to meet mandate. |
Successfully met |
56.0 |
68.9* * Actual spending exceeded plan by $12.9 million due primarily to use of $11.0 million to address IM\IT infrastructure requirements, comply with mandatory government-wide IT security policy, and respond to a computer malware infection. |
** Actual spending was less than plan by $19.4 million. Some of this was due to delays and timing changes such as the review of program strategy for the Integrated Healthy Living and Chronic Disease Strategy as well as the requirement to allocate funding for new priorities. In addition, $2.2 million could not be used as expected for vaccine readiness and surveillance tools, and $1.2 million stemmed from an uncontrollable delay in contracting for work on a Winnipeg laboratory expansion project.
Note: The Agency’s total planned spending of $629.7 million included $13.9 million not allocated to the six priorities. The main unallocated item was $10.4 million for Hepatitis C, as the program was sunsetting. The program was subsequently extended, and has been allocated to the ‘actual spending’ for the priorities, as has all other Agency spending for 2007-08.
The expanding global economy, the convergence of people in large urban areas and the ease with which people and goods travel around the world are but some of the factors challenging Canada’s public health system.
External factors which influenced the Agency’s activities during 2006-07 included the emergence of infectious diseases, such as avian influenza and other potential pandemics, both nationally and internationally; natural disasters; Canada’s gradually aging population; social trends affecting the risk of chronic diseases; the changing nature of our environment; and the continued rapid evolution of science and technology.
The number of Canadians dying from or living with infectious diseases has been climbing since the 1980s. Worldwide, infectious diseases are the second leading cause of death and the leading killer of infants and children. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that in 2002, the most recent year for which statistics are available, approximately 11 million of the 57 million deaths that occurred worldwide were caused by infectious and parasitic diseases. While the impact of this phenomenon is being felt most profoundly in developing countries, Canada has not been immune. The increase in the speed and volume of global travel places Canadians within 24 hours of almost any other place in the world – which is less than the incubation period for most communicable diseases transported by individuals or products. The threat of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases and the potential for bioterrorism has made the ability to rapidly identify infectious agents and clusters of disease vitally important.
There were two major infectious disease threats that Canada faced in 2006-07. Each could have had a significant impact on Canada’s economic and social stability as well as on collective and individual health and safety. The first was the potential for the highly contagious and deadly H5N1 (Asian) sub-type of avian influenza to spread to domestic birds in Canada. The second was the growing potential for the appearance of a new strain of this (or another) virus that has adapted to humans, resulting in human-to-human transmission and the possible setting off of a human influenza pandemic. According to WHO, the occurrence of the next pandemic influenza is “a question of when, not if.”
The H5N1 (Asian) avian influenza virus has demonstrated the ability to infect and cause fatal illness in humans. During the period from December 2003 to April 2007, 291 human cases, resulting in 172 deaths, were laboratory-confirmed in 12 countries.
Natural disasters such as the Asian Tsunami and Hurricane Katrina vividly underscore the importance of emergency preparedness and capacity building in order to enable the quick and effective responses necessary to minimize suffering and loss. Recent natural disasters have provided many lessons and highlighted the need for integrated and coordinated emergency management and effective emergency communications at all levels of government, among federal departments and agencies, and with other stakeholders including individual citizens.
Changing demographics are an important factor in Canada. While Canada has the highest rate of population growth among the ‘G8’ (group of eight economically leading countries), the majority of this comes from immigration. Due to a combination of low birth rates and longer life spans, there is an upward trend in the proportion of seniors in the Canadian population. It is projected that by 2016, those 65 years of age and older will represent approximately 16% of the country’s population. This change will have an impact on the incidence and distribution of many diseases, and is likely to place increasing pressures on health services in Canada.
Changes in Canadian society have resulted in shifts in nutrition patterns and in living and working conditions. These changes are key factors in the development of the leading chronic diseases in Canada. They have the potential to trigger significant increases in these diseases at substantial cost to the country’s economy and society. Unhealthy eating, lack of physical activity and obesity continue to be critical public health issues that have a significant bearing on health outcomes for Canadians and the health care system.
Canadians are increasingly recognizing the linkages between health and the environment, not only in areas like the effects of toxins and pollutants, but also in the impacts of climate change and the trade-offs involved in sustainable development. Growing populations are placing an increased pressure on the environment globally while, in Canada, greater urbanization brings with it increased demands for energy, land and other resources, as well as increased concentrations of toxins and pollutants. A strong and comprehensive public health policy is needed to identify and address linkages between health and the environment and to assist affected communities.
The rate of scientific discovery and technological innovation has increased dramatically in the past decade, but the impact on the health sector has been mixed. On the one hand, advances in treatment and care offer new opportunities to address illness and improve health. On the other hand, these advances have placed increased cost pressures on Canada’s already stressed health system. By providing new approaches for improving health and preventing disease, advances in public health can help mitigate these costs. For example, there have been rapid advances in public health genomics - an emerging field that assesses the impact of the interaction between genes and the environment (i.e., physical environment, diet, behaviour, drugs, and agents of infectious diseases) on population health. There is a potential that the knowledge from advances in biotechnology and genome-based research can be applied to prevent disease and improve the health of populations.
The Agency’s focus on public health allows it to contribute directly to a key Government of Canada Outcome: Healthy Canadians
The Agency’s work also supports achievement of other Government of Canada outcomes, including:
Safe and secure communities - The Agency plays an important role in reducing the threat of infectious diseases and chemical and biological agents, and accordingly contributes to the safety of Canadian communities;
A safe and secure world through international cooperation - The Agency is committed to strengthening global health security in collaboration with its international partners. To support Canada’s participation in the Global Health Security Initiative, the Agency advances pandemic influenza preparedness, moves forward to prepare against chemical and biological threats, and leads the Global Health Security Action Group Laboratory Network. The Agency’s efforts contribute to Canada’s effective participation in the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America;
An innovative and knowledge-based economy - The Agency, in its own laboratories and working with partners, conducts and provides financial support for applied research on health technologies. For example, it facilitates the translation of research to develop and test newer, faster, and more productive technologies that can deliver safe and effective vaccine products to Canadians and thus advance broader socio-economic interests. This leading-edge work has the potential to generate ‘spin off’ economic development while it significantly boosts public confidence in Canada's ability to deal with emerging health threats.
(For more information about Government of Canada Outcomes see http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/report/govrev/06/cp-rc_e.asp ).
The following section provides an explanation of the progress summarized in the ‘report card’ above. It identifies each commitment, indicates whether the Agency successfully met, partially met, or exceeded expectations, and then elaborates on what was accomplished.
1. Develop, enhance and implement integrated and disease-specific strategies and programs for the prevention and control of infectious disease - Successfully met
In 2006-07 the Agency delivered a number of key initiatives in collaboration with its partners and stakeholders. It reviewed, revised, and expanded the scope of its widely used Infection Control Guideline Series; published the Canadian National Report on Immunization; provided surveillance for diseases including Lyme disease, West Nile virus and health-care acquired infections;collaborated with provinces and territories as well as internationally on issues related to immunization and vaccine-preventable infectious diseases; took the leadership role in coordinating Canada’s first collaborative immunization program planning exercise, focussing on a vaccine for the human papillomavirus; and helped to organizethe Canadian Immunization Conference. The Agency’s street-youth surveillance pilot project, undertaken in collaboration with external stakeholders, has led to the development of more effective mechanisms to reach street youth and provide testing and care for HIV, sexually transmitted infections and related infections.
Through this and other work the Agency developed proposals to achieve a more integrated and coordinated approach to managing infectious disease and improving the health status of those who become infected. This included developing, enhancing and implementing integrated and disease-specific strategies and programs. Overall, the Agency was successful in strengthening multisectoral, multijurisdictional, and multidisciplinary approaches to infectious disease prevention.
2. Develop, enhance and implement integrated and disease- or condition-specific strategies and programs within the health portfolio to promote health and prevent and control chronic disease and injury - Successfully met
In 2006-07, the Agency worked closely with its partners and stakeholders to implement components of the Healthy Living and Chronic Disease initiative. This included:
Additionally, the Agency was a key stakeholder in the development of the Canadian Strategy on Cancer Control (CSCC) by supporting and facilitating the transition of responsibility for the implementation of the CSCC to the new Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, an arms length, not-for-profit entity.
3. Increase Canada's preparedness for and ability to respond to public health emergencies, including pandemic influenza - Successfully met
The Agency continued to take an all-hazards approach encompassing emergency medical response to infectious disease outbreaks, natural disasters, explosions or chemical, biological or radiological/nuclear incidents in 2006-07. As a member of the Global Health Security Initiative, the Agency supported an effective national emergency management system and advanced work, globally and within Canada, on infectious disease outbreaks and pandemic influenza preparedness.
To increase Canada's preparedness for and ability to respond to public health emergencies, including pandemic influenza, the Agency engaged in extensive emergency preparedness and response planning with provincial and territorial governments, other federal departments and agencies, and non governmental organizations to identify emerging priorities, establish work plans and coordinate activities. Work was done to put in place arrangements with provincial and territorial governments to facilitate mutual assistance and information exchanges during public health emergencies. The Agency played a key role in the development of the Federal, Provincial, and Territorial Memorandum of Understanding on the Provision of Mutual Aid in Relation to Health Resources during an Emergency, which was received by the Conference of Deputy Ministers of Health.
The Agency, in co-operation with Public Safety Canada, the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade and the Canadian Food inspection Agency, the Public Health Agency of Canada co-developed the North American Avian and Pandemic Influenza Plan with the United States and Mexico to 1) detect, contain and control an avian influenza outbreak and prevent transmission to humans; 2) prevent or slow the entry of a novel strain of human influenza to North America; 3) coordinate emergency management and communications; 4) minimize unwarranted disruptions to the flow of people, goods and services at the borders and 5) sustain critical infrastructure.
Guided by the Council of the Pan-Canadian Public Health Network (PHN), the Agency led robust citizen and stakeholder dialogues as one part of a multi-faceted decision making process in the development of a national policy recommendation on the use of antivirals for prevention during an influenza pandemic.
Also, the Agency continued to build an effective stockpile of critical supplies including anti-viral drugs in order to respond to a pandemic and other public health emergencies.
4. Strengthen public health within Canada and internationally by facilitating public health collaboration and enhancing public health capacity - Successfully met
In 2006-07 the Agency built on initial successes such as the establishment of the Pan-Canadian Public Health Network. For example, the Agency provided secretariat, policy, technical, and financial support to the Network’s following groups:
The Agency also continued to work closely and cooperatively with all of its partners toward a seamless and comprehensive pan-Canadian public health system by addressing cross-jurisdictional human resources capacity, collaborative information systems and tools, knowledge dissemination, and the public health law and policy system.
Further, through partnerships and initiatives at the local, regional, national and international levels, and with the help of the National Collaborating Centres for Public Health, the Agency supported public health professionals and stakeholders in their efforts to keep pace with rapidly evolving conditions, knowledge and practices.
5. Lead several government-wide efforts to advance action on the determinants of health - Successfully met
During the fiscal year, the Agency, while recognizing the many influences that lie within the purview of other departments, jurisdictions and sectors, continued to strengthen its partnerships to help address the factors that lead to disparities in health status. In the process the Agency advocated for healthy public policy and led efforts to advance action on the determinants-of-health approach to health policy. In particular, the Agency contributed to and helped disseminate learnings from the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health through its partnerships with other countries and through its leadership of the Canadian Reference Group (CRG), a partnership involving federal departments, provinces, non-government organizations and academia. The CRG held dialogue sessions with non governmental organizations to determine common agendas. It also organized numerous presentations and dialogues on the social determinants of health. Further, the Agency held an exploratory meeting with leading health economists from across Canada to consider the feasibility of developing an economic case for investment in the determinants of health.
The Agency’s funding programs used grants and contributions to support initiatives across the country to increase community capacity and promote intersectoral action on the determinants of health. In the Atlantic Region, the Population Health Fund supported projects which built community capacity to promote healthy public policies, particularly as they affect inequity and chronic disease. In Quebec, this Fund supported projects to promote healthy, sustainable communities and to address the links between environment and health. The Manitoba/Saskatchewan Region used the Population Health Fund to support projects that address issues such as food security and healthy aging, with a focus on aboriginal populations. Further, programs like the Diabetes Prevention and Promotion Contribution Program, the AIDS Community Action Program and the Hepatitis C Prevention, Support and Research Program also fund projects which consider linkages between health determinants, risk behaviour and disease incidence and support approaches which address the root causes of these conditions.
6. Develop and enhance the Agency's internal capacity to meet its mandate - Successfully met
The Agency developed and enhanced its internal capacity. This included reviewing its Program Activity Architecture, developing risk mitigation and management strategies, and initiating strategic and business planning processes that addressed capacity issues including expansion of laboratories as well as further development of the Winnipeg headquarters and the Agency’s regional offices.
During 2006-07 the Agency had a single strategic outcome and a single program activity. Work done during the year including updating the strategic outcome and creating an enhanced Program Activity Architecture for fiscal year 2007-08, to better reflect the Agency’s responsibilities and to enable a more detailed reporting on accomplishments and resource use.
The Strategic Risk Communications Framework and Handbook was launched, a new and unique tool designed to enable the Agency to integrate strategic risk communications into effective risk management, using a science-based process to support effective decision-making. The tools and techniques better enable the Agency to plan and conduct effective risk communications as an integral component of good decision-making with stakeholders and ultimately the Canadian public.
An Agency Corporate Risk Assessment and Profile was developed during 2006-07 with extensive participation from management at all levels, and elements of an integrated risk management strategy were put in place. For example, Senior Management met on a regular basis to review risk areas and take action, when needed, to mitigate risk. The Agency's planning was informed by risk, and risk mitigation processes were implemented in a number of Agency programs. The Agency has committed to further develop and operationalize the corporate risk profile as the first step in incorporating an integrated risk-management framework into the Agency's daily operational practices.
During 2006-07 the Agency embarked on its first ever strategic planning process, to set the broad directions and establish the priorities to guide Agency efforts over the next five years. The Agency’s Strategic Plan will become the core of an integrated approach to planning, providing a policy overlay to ensure that annual business plans are well-integrated, resources are aligned accordingly, and the entire effort is supported by clear accountabilities. The strategic plan is available at http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/.
In 2006-07, the Agency made progress with its initial Corporate Business Plan. The Agency’s program and support areas identified their objectives, challenges, and strategies in developing the Agency's initial business plan, and laid the foundation for an effective annual business planning process.
Other notable internal capacity development achievements by the Agency during 2006-07:
Further information on the Agency’s Strategic Plan, Program Activity Architecture, and other internal capacity building initiatives is available in Section IV of this document.
Strategic Outcome:
A Healthier Population by Promoting Health and Preventing Disease and Injury
Program Activity Name: Population and Public Health
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
$629.7 million |
$536.2 million* |
$510.8 million** |
* The $93.5 million difference between planned spending and authorities is mainly due to the deferment of $44 million in funding for Avian and Pandemic Influenza Preparedness to subsequent fiscal years, and expected funding of $51 million for Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control not flowing through the Agency.
** Actual spending was $25.4 million lower than total authorities primarily due to capacity and technical constraints which impeded the full utilization of approved resources. Of the $25.4 million figure, operating expenditure totalled $20.5 million and transfer payments totalled $4.9 million.
Planned |
Actual |
Difference |
2,119 |
2,050 |
69 |
*To properly include persons employed for part of the year and/or employed part time in a measure showing average employment over the year, 'full-time equivalent' is calculated based on days worked . The Agency began the fiscal year with approximately 1,968 employees and ended it with approximately 2,157.
In collaboration with partners, the Agency leads federal efforts and mobilizes pan-Canadian actions to promote and protect national and international public health. These actions include anticipating, preparing for, responding to and recovering from threats to public health; and monitoring, researching and reporting on diseases, injuries, other preventable health risks and their determinants, and the general state of public health in Canada and internationally. These activities are designed to support effective disease prevention and health promotion, and building and sustaining a public health network with stakeholders. The Agency uses the best available knowledge and evidence to inform and engage Canadian and international public health stakeholders on various aspects of public health activities and to provide public health information, advice and leadership.
This Program Activity supports all six Priorities in the 2006-07 Report on Plans and Priorities.
Canada must be prepared to respond to the public health risks posed by all natural and human-caused disasters, such as infectious disease outbreaks, natural disasters and criminal or terrorist acts such as explosions and the release of toxins or biological agents. Major preparedness challenges include planning to effectively deal with all possible hazards, providing training to health responders, coordinating among all levels of government, and holding sufficient emergency supplies across the country.
Planned ($M) |
Authorities ($M) |
Actual ($M) |
13.9 |
13.7 |
12.9* |
* Actual spending was $0.8 million lower than authorities due to capacity and technical constraints.
What was planned
In 2006-07, the Agency planned to:
What was achieved
The Agency completed these plans, other than developing regulations for the updated Quarantine act, with some achievements going beyond expectations.
The Global Public Health Intelligence Network (GPHIN) anticipates and tracks infectious disease outbreaks using software which monitors large volumes of worldwide news reports. During 2006-07 GPHIN added the capability of monitoring in Portuguese, and provided a team of analysts to cover the evening and night shift to provide 24/7 analytical coverage to meet the needs of stakeholders such as WHO and other users worldwide for accurate and timely information.
Using GPHIN, the Agency provided support to mass gathering events by monitoring for potential public health threats during the entire event. GPHIN worked closely with the Caribbean Epidemiology Centre (CAREC) to provide support during the Cricket World Cup games held in Trinidad and Tobago and its neighbouring Caribbean countries in March 2007.
A new Quarantine Act came into force on December 12th, 2006. It replaced the existing Quarantine Act and Quarantine Regulations with new and modern authorities to better protect Canadians from the introduction and spread of foreign communicable diseases. The Agency developed necessary implementation tools, which included: training key federal officials including Quarantine and Environmental Health Officers; developing standard operating procedures; and educating federal, provincial, and territorial partners on the new legislation.
The Quarantine Act contains authority to make regulations on a variety of topics. Work began on the assessment of needs so that the Agency will be able to develop regulations in accordance with their priority.
The development of a National Marine Quarantine Protocol was undertaken to strengthen the delivery of quarantine services to marine ports. This Agency-led initiative provided guidance for departments and agencies with responsibilities related to quarantine issues at sea and in Canadian ports.
The Agency delayed development of new regulations for the new Quarantine Act owing to a major policy issue that was eventually resolved through Bill C42, but was otherwise able to complete all other plans, with some achievements going beyond expectations. Development of new regulations was rescheduled.
Working collaboratively with partners and stakeholders under the Treasury Board’s Public Safety and Anti-Terrorism initiative , the Agency developed and delivered Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) training courses such as Tier 1 Laboratory Bioterrorism Recognition and the five-partner CBRN First Responder training led by Public Safety Canada. Additionally, the Agency coordinated development and pilot implementation of Emergency Social Services, Emergency Health Services, and Disaster Behavioural Health for Health Care Professionals courses. The Agency will be putting both new and existing programs on-line in order to facilitate effective delivery of the courses for Canadians who require or desire this training.
The 2006 National Forum on Emergency Preparedness and Response, held in Vancouver in December, brought more than 250 emergency management stakeholders from around Canada to address the issue of building more disaster-resilient communities in Canada. This has laid the foundation for the development of a more comprehensive vulnerability/resiliency framework to reduce the risks of emergencies to Canadians. The Agency and PSC co-hosted and funded the forum.
The Agency developed and conducted the first of a series of monthly tabletop exercises to more clearly define processes, operating concepts and procedures, and roles & responsibilities for each of the functional groups within the newly redeveloped Emergency Response Structure.
In 2006-07, the Agency led the development of a pandemic influenza exercise named Coherence Trecedim II, a Tabletop Exercise for the 2006 National Forum on Emergency Preparedness and Response. Over two hundred stakeholders from the provinces, territories, non-governmental organizations and the federal government took part. The exercise provided insight into the Agency’s capacity to communicate with our partners and stakeholders, and with the general public, during a pandemic. This exercise focused, in part, on gaps identified during the 2005 National Forum exercise.
A series of consultations and workshops were held on emergency preparedness and at-risk groups, such as seniors, persons with disabilities, and children, to develop a more coordinated mechanism to address their needs in emergencies. This included collaboration with the World Health Organization on the organization of two international workshops focusing on older persons in disasters. Additionally, the Agency and the Canadian Psychological Association co-hosted a roundtable of key psychosocial and disaster mental health planning to identify key issues and priorities for preparing to manage the emotional and behavioural impacts of emergencies.
The Agency supported the development of the Voluntary Sector Framework for Health Emergencies and the formation of the Council of Emergency Voluntary Sector Directors comprised mainly of the major NGOs and voluntary organizations. This is intended to enhance coordination of preparedness, response and recovery activities across the non-government and voluntary health sector.
Planned ($M) |
Authorities ($M) |
Actual ($M) |
9.1 |
14.0 |
12.0* |
* Actual spending was $2.0 million lower than authorities due to capacity and technical constraints.
What was planned
In 2006-07, the Agency committed to:
What was achieved
The Agency maintained its 24/7 response capability and 24-hour delivery commitment for its National Emergency Stockpile System (NESS). To remain able to respond to new and emerging threats, the Agency completely reviewed NESS holdings using an up-to-date Risk and Threat Assessment. The Agency, in collaboration with the provinces and territories, continued to build an effective stockpile of critical supplies including anti-viral drugs in order to respond to pandemic and other public health emergencies. By modernizing NESS, and by supporting and facilitating the national dialogue on emergency measures under an all-hazardous approach, the Agency continued to improve its pandemic influenza preparedness in 2006-07.
In support of Canada’s participation in the Global Health Security Initiative’s Global Health Security Action Group Laboratory Network, the Agency started developing an Environmental Sampling Framework for use after a bioterrorist event.
The Agency provided training to the Health Portfolio for the Transportation of Dangerous Goods, including infectious substances, hazardous chemical and radioactive substances. The Agency also developed and offered train-the-trainer courses on this topic.
The Agency assisted the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade with the Canadian implementation of the Biological Toxins and Weapons Convention. The Agency was a member of the Canadian delegation to the United Nations where significant progress was made to improve international participation in the annual Confidence Building Measures report process.
Canada chaired a lab network (GHSAG-LN) of the G7 countries plus Mexico. In this forum the Agency contributed to significant progress, including exchange of critical testing protocols for situations of suspected bioterrorism.
Public health security was enhanced by the Agency through the provision of essential up-to-date information on international public health to Canadian travellers and front-line health care workers. To be effective, the program utilized tools such as the Global Public Health Intelligence Network (GPHIN), which anticipates and tracks infectious diseases using software to monitor large volumes of worldwide news related to infectious and chronic disease, natural disasters, environmental and agricultural concerns that might affect the health of Canadian travellers.
Canadian traveller health was further protected as the Agency’s Travel Medicine Program dispensed yellow fever vaccine in accordance with national standards in 2006-07. A review of the program, initiated to ensure that the program would meet Canada's yellow fever vaccination obligations under the revised International Health Regulations (2005), highlighted the need for further collaboration with the provinces and territories to modernize vaccine delivery.
The Agency continued to provide the official federal representation as well as secretariat, policy, technical, and financial support to the Emergency Preparedness and Response Expert Group of the Pan-Canadian Public Health Network. This Expert Group’s role is to enhance emergency preparedness and response capacity across Canada through the development of evidence-based frameworks and practices that encompass the full spectrum of emergency management including mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery from a federal, provincial and territorial context.
The Agency played a key role in the development of the Federal, Provincial, and Territorial Memorandum of Understanding on the Provision of Mutual Aid in Relation to Health Resources during an Emergency. This work, which was tasked to the Expert Group on Emergency Preparedness and Response by the Pan-Canadian Public Health Network, was completed and the agreement was ready for sign off by the Federal, Provincial, and Territorial Ministers of Health.
The Agency was not able to field the first Health Emergency Response Team (HERT) as had been planned. The National Office of Health Emergency Response Teams continued to address all aspects of establishing these teams of health professionals from outside the federal government who will provide medical surge capacity. A draft operational framework was developed, and the Agency completed 80% of the procurement of equipment for the first HERT Unit. Work was initiated with Central Agencies on mechanisms to engage HERT volunteers, and with the Federation of Medical Regulatory Authorities of Canada on cross-border Provincial, and Territorial licensure. Revised timelines for HERT include commissioning an Ottawa team in 2007, Vancouver and Halifax teams during 2008 and a Winnipeg team by 2009.
Plans to establish a permanent executive liaison function to Public Safety Canada (PSC) were held in abeyance while the Agency worked to establish the necessary conditions. However, the Agency continued working with PSC and other federal departments within the Government of Canada’s National Emergency Management framework.
With its work on the National Health Emergency Management System, the Agency made significant progress toward completing the main mapping document of the System’s federal, provincial and territorial components, and this work will continue.
The Agency continued to maintain the Emergency Operations Centre (EOC) system for the federal Health Portfolio. The EOC provides the platform from which the Agency and Health Canada will respond to any public health emergency. Development of new emergency management software that integrates geo-spatial technology continued during the year. The Agency also participated in an interdepartmental pilot project to enable easier, more efficient sharing of information and data among federal, provincial, and territorial partners and stakeholders in routine and emergency situations.
The Agency hosted, in Ottawa, the first international meeting of Regulators of the Contained Use of Human Pathogens. This saw the participation of representatives from the US (the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention), Switzerland, UK, Australia, Japan, and Singapore as well as the World Health Organization.
In summary, the Agency accomplished all emergency response capacity activities planned in the 2006-07 Report on Plans and Priorities, with the exception of establishing the complete Health Emergency Response Team (HERT) and creating a permanent executive liaison function with the National Emergency Response System.
Despite recent advancements in prevention, treatment and control, the number of Canadians dying from or living with infectious diseases has been climbing since the 1980s, due in part to HIV/AIDS. An estimated 58,000 Canadian residents are living with HIV, and approximately one quarter of them are unaware of their condition.
The unpredictability and dynamic evolution of disease causing biological agents (pathogens), the animal origins of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases and the spread of antimicrobial-resistant organisms and hospital acquired infections are creating formidable challenges for the prevention and control of infectious diseases.
In addition, the potential for co-infection by multiple micro-organisms with common risk factors, vulnerable populations and modes of transmission increases the need for comprehensive national approaches across groups of infectious diseases.
Communicable Disease Control Expert Group
The Agency continued to provide the official federal representation as well as secretariat, policy, technical, and financial support to the Communicable Disease Control Expert Group of the Public Health Network. The Expert Group’s role is to provide strong leadership in communicable disease prevention and control through the development, recommendation and implementation of national policies, practices, guidelines and standards from a federal, provincial and territorial context. |
Planned Spending ($M) |
Total Authorities ($M) |
Actual Spending ($M) |
92.6 |
36.7* |
30.9** |
* The $55.9 million difference between the planned spending and total authorities is due mainly to funding being reprofiled to subsequent fiscal years and distributed to other programs to support their pandemic related initiatives.
** Actual spending was $5.8 million lower than authorities due to capacity and technical constraints. $2.2 million occurred because reprofiling was denied for vaccine readiness and surveillance tools, and $1.2 million stemmed from an uncontrollable delay in contracting for work on a Winnipeg laboratory expansion project.
What was planned
Recognizing that an influenza pandemic has the potential to be the largest public health infectious disease emergency in Canadian history, the Agency planned to take a leadership role in the publication of the updated Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan for the Health Sector, and in promoting implementation of the update by all levels of government.
The Plan includes ensuring that there is an adequate domestic capacity to produce appropriate pandemic influenza vaccine. The Agency also made it a priority to appropriately increase and diversify the stock of antivirals for treatment.
What was achieved
The Agency took a leadership role in updating and publishing the updated Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan for the Health Sector in December 2006, in collaboration with the provinces and territories. The Agency also promoted that the updated plan be adopted by all levels of government.
The Agency took steps to strengthen Canada’s capacity to prepare for and respond to the threat of avian and pandemic influenza in seven major areas:
Effective and timely surveillance is critical to the ability of the government to accurately detect, monitor and respond to an emerging infectious disease. The Agency continued to support the integrated public health information system (iPHIS) and undertook necessary enhancements such as the improved capability to extract pertinent data thereby ensuring that the system is ready if called upon for responding to potential outbreaks and health emergencies.
Immunization is an important element of an effective response to pandemic influenza. Canada is now better prepared to develop and deliver a pandemic influenza vaccine. The Agency continued to administer a 10-year contract between ID Biomedical Corporation (operating as GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals North America) and the Government of Canada to develop and maintain domestic pandemic vaccine production capacity. The Agency also continued to administer a 2005 amendment to that contract for production and testing of a prototype pandemic vaccine, including conducting clinical trials, which will build upon current, company sponsored, trials and which will address issues of specific concern to Canada.
The Agency continued discussions with the vaccine manufacturer, GlaxoSmithKline, concerning enhanced pandemic readiness through access to expanded production capacity, potential regional projects for adverse event reporting, and strengthening adverse event surveillance and reporting.
A component of the preparation for an influenza pandemic is establishing a reserve of antiviral medication. During 2006-07 the National Antiviral Stockpile (NAS) for early treatment of pandemic influenza was expanded to 51 million doses, as approximately 21 million additional doses were delivered to provinces and territories. This initiative was funded through a cost sharing arrangement between the Agency and provincial & territorial governments. Also during 2006-07, in collaboration with the provinces and territories, the Agency led the development of a national policy recommendation on the advisability of stockpiling antivirals for prevention during a pandemic; this is to be submitted to federal, provincial, and territorial Ministers of Health later during 2007.
With the increasing profile of pandemic influenza issues, there was an urgent need to strengthen the Agency’s capacity for strategic policy to support federal, provincial, and territorial relations, executive support and corporate correspondence. A Pandemic Preparedness Secretariat, led by a Director General, was established and began to provide a focal point for Agency participation in federal, provincial, territorial, cross-sectoral and international work to improve Canada’s avian and pandemic influenza preparedness.
Emergency preparedness activities are critical in order to adequately prepare for, respond to, and recover from the public health implications of avian or pandemic influenza.
The Agency worked with Public Safety Canada (PSC) on establishing an interdepartmental protocol for early notification and liaison and also continued developing the National Health Incident Management System (NHIMS) with provinces and territories to facilitate the coordination of planning and response mechanisms both within and across jurisdictions during emergencies.
The Agency, with Public Safety Canada, the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, co-developed a North American Avian and Pandemic Influenza Plan with the United States and Mexico to 1) detect, contain and control an avian influenza outbreak and prevent transmission to humans; 2) prevent or slow the entry of a novel strain of human influenza to North America; 3) coordinate emergency management and communications; 4) minimize unwarranted disruptions to the flow of people, goods and services at the borders and 5)sustain critical infrastructure.
Agency Success Across Canada: Pandemic and Avian Influenza Planning In 2006-07 the Agency collaborated with partners from federal and provincial governments, as well as essential partners from the non-government and private sectors, in planning for pandemic influenza and avian influenza emergencies. The Agency’s Manitoba/Saskatchewan Office was instrumental in building strategic partnerships with the development of the Joint Federal – Provincial H5N1 Avian Influenza Planning Group, whose members represent several federal and provincial departments, non government organizations and the poultry industry. This group is now developing an intersectoral plan for coordinated management of an avian influenza emergency in Manitoba, and the Agency led federal participation during preparatory exercises testing the Groups operational effectiveness. Also, the Agency provided essential training in emergency management and pandemic influenza planning to participants. In Atlantic Canada the Agency and Public Safety Canada (PSC) co-sponsored a meeting on June 8, 2006 of representatives of key provincial and federal departments and agencies to discuss emergency pandemic influenza planning. Representatives from the four Atlantic provinces’ Departments of Health, Emergency Measures Organizations, and Health Emergency Management organizations attended along with regional representatives of the Agency, Health Canada and PSC. The meeting provided an opportunity to share information, clarify roles and responsibilities and identify common issues and themes with the objective of facilitating ongoing collaboration and coordination in the region - an important first step in emergency pandemic influenza preparedness. |
The Agency’s National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) conducts scientific research and development in a wide range of areas related to viral, bacterial and prion infectious agents. As Canada’s leading laboratory with high-containment facilities (Levels 3 and 4), NML is uniquely positioned to rapidly isolate, identify and characterize novel agents (e.g., new strains of influenza virus) as they arise periodically, using a variety of advanced technology applications built on genomics, proteomics and biocomputing. NML is also in the forefront in development of these modern public health technologies, applying them to diagnostics, vaccines, and molecular epidemiology.
On a less specialized level, NML’s scientists work continuously to collect laboratory data on infectious agents and diseases of importance both in Canada and internationally. These data are translated by regulators (e.g., Health Canada, Canadian Food Inspection Agency) and federal, provincial, and territorial public-health stakeholders into risk assessments, decisions, policies and guidelines for disease prevention, treatment, control and management. Internationally as well, NML’s contribution is increasingly valued by collaborating organizations such as the World Health Organization. Through NML, the Agency’s reach has been extended globally through its capacity to transfer and deploy its expertise to other countries, and through its support for professional interchange.
Examples of active areas for structured public health intervention based on laboratory data are food safety (enteric pathogens, BSE); blood safety (hepatitis viruses, variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease); zoonotic diseases (West Nile Virus, influenza virus); hospital infection control (antimicrobial-resistant bacteria); and travel and quarantine (drug-resistant tuberculosis). In a less direct way, safer community environments are also promoted, by using laboratory data to reduce the impact of community-acquired diseases such as pneumonia, tuberculosis and sexually transmitted infections, particularly in vulnerable populations such as those in day-care centres and long-term care facilities.
NML operated at full capacity during the year. To help keep laboratory capacity and scientific activity commensurate with public health needs, during 2006-07 the Agency successfully brought forward a plan for the purchase of a provincially-owned laboratory facility (the Logan Lab); purchased necessary equipment and began migration of selected administrative services which had been housed at NML to an office building in the downtown area.
Risk communications has been recognized as a vitally important public health intervention. The Agency conducted public consultations and public opinion research on key issues related to pandemic influenza that will inform both the Agency’s policy development and communications planning. Public information materials, including two posters and a brochure, were produced, translated into multiple languages and distributed to key stakeholders. Public service announcements that would offer Canadians information about pandemic influenza and how they can protect themselves were produced for radio, Web and print media, in preparation for a pandemic.
The Agency also continued to strengthen its networks with provincial and territorial counterparts, as well as with international partners, in the area of communications.
To address the shortages which limit the ability of provinces and territories and local public health authorities to meet the Agency's priorities for surveillance and response, the Agency established the Public Health Service Program. The Agency engaged core staff and undertook initial consultation for internal collaboration among field staff programs and completed the first round of consultations with provincial and territorial governments. This formed the basis for a second round of talks with provinces and territories and the establishment of official agreements to deploy Public Health Officers in the next fiscal year.
The Agency provided a $1 million grant to support the implementation of the WHO Global Action Plan to increase global pandemic influenza vaccine supply.
Planned ($M) |
Authorities ($M) |
Actual ($M) |
10.0 |
9.9 |
8.6* |
* Actual spending was $1.3 million lower than authorities due to capacity and technical constraints.
What was planned
Immunization has proven to be one of the most effective types of public health intervention. Consistent with the National Immunization Strategy, which was accepted by the Conference of Federal, Provincial and Territorial Deputy Ministers of Health in 2003, the Agency planned to provide scientific, program, policy, information dissemination, coordination and administrative support to the federal, provincial and territorial Canadian Immunization Committee (CIC), and the National Advisory Committee on Immunization under the auspices of the Pan-Canadian Public Health Network, and to collaborate internationally on issues related to immunization and vaccine-preventable infectious diseases.
What was achieved
The planned initiatives were met and in some cases exceeded.
The Agency provided scientific, program, policy, information dissemination, coordination and administrative support to the federal, provincial and territorial Canadian Immunization Committee (NACI), and the National Advisory Committee on Immunization under the auspices of the Pan-Canadian Public Health Network.
With Agency participation and administrative support, NACI published the 7th edition of the Canadian Immunization Guide and distributed approximately 40,000 copies nationally. Also with Agency participation and administrative support NACI released its public health recommendations for the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, the first vaccine approved for use in Canada to protect women and girls against cervical cancer. In order to facilitate timely and equitable access across Canada, Budget 2007 provided $300 million over three years to provinces and territories to launch HPV vaccine programs. The Agency took the leadership role in coordinating Canada’s first collaborative immunization program planning exercise. Both national committees, CIC and NACI, formed a joint task force to evaluate options and provide evidence to inform immunization programming planning decisions focussing on this vaccine.
The CIC approved the national cold chain guidelines for publications, received approval from the Pan-Canadian Public Health Network, to adopt the national goal for eliminating rubella and congenital rubella syndrome, and approved national goals and recommendations for five vaccine preventable diseases: influenza, invasive pneumococcal disease, invasive menningococcal disease, varicella and rubella. Under the guidance of the CIC an external consultant evaluated the National Immunization Strategy three years into its mandate.
The Agency published the Canadian National Report on Immunization, including information on vaccine preventable disease epidemiology, vaccine coverage, vaccine safety/adverse events, and progress with the National Immunization Strategy. Also published were:
To collaborate internationally on issues related to immunization and vaccine-preventable infectious diseases, the Agency worked with international agencies such as the World Health Organization and the Pan American Health Organization, continuing to provide technical leadership and advice for vaccine-preventable disease elimination and eradication globally. The Agency also participated in the International Circumpolar Surveillance Initiative in order to better understand the epidemiology of a variety of invasive bacterial diseases above the 60th parallel.
In collaboration with the Canadian Paediatric Society and the Canadian Association for Immunization Research and Evaluation, the Agency organized a Canadian Immunization Conference, which took place December 3-6, 2006, in Winnipeg, Manitoba, and drew more than 1,000 participants. The exchange of ideas and expertise at this conference is expected to help stimulate both the development and application of new scientific and technological advances.
Planned ($M) |
Authorities ($M) |
Actual ($M) |
52.8 |
52.8 |
52.8 |
There has been a steep increase in sexually transmitted infections over the last decade, and rising co-infections of HIV with diseases such as tuberculosis,hepatitis C and syphilis.
What was planned
In 2006-07 the Agency planned:
What was achieved
All these plans were accomplished during 2006-07.
The Agency continued to lead the Federal Initiative to Address HIV/AIDS in Canada. The Federal Initiative is a partnership among the Agency, Health Canada, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Correctional Service Canada. Its aim is to prevent new infections, slow the progression of HIV/AIDS, improve the quality of life for affected people, reduce the social and economic impact of the disease, and contribute to the global efforts against the epidemic. Through this initiative, the Agency continued its efforts to strengthen the knowledge of HIV/AIDS to provide better information on prevention, care, treatment and support programs; increase public awareness of HIV/AIDS and factors that fuel the epidemic, such as stigma and discrimination; integrate, when appropriate, HIV/AIDS programs and services with those addressing other related diseases, such as STIs; engage federal departments in addressing factors that influence health, such as housing and poverty; increase Canadian participation in the global response to HIV/AIDS; and support partners to implement effective interventions to address HIV/AIDS.
During 2006-07, the Agency worked with national and international partners to update the estimates of national HIV incidence and prevalence in Canada for 2005. The new estimates were released prior to the International AIDS Conference in Toronto in August 2006 and are now being used to guide program and policy actions. The Agency also continued to develop Canada’s second-generation HIV surveillance program for monitoring HIV and related risk behaviours among groups at high risk for HIV infection. The monitoring program for people who use injection drugs now has sites from Quebec to British Columbia, while the program for men who have sex with men completed its first round of surveys in Montreal and in Ontario. A similar pilot study for people from countries where HIV is endemic was started in the Montreal Haitian community.
As part of its efforts to contribute to the global response, the Agency supported the Canadian HIV Vaccine Initiative, announced by the Prime Minister in February 2007, to develop safe and effective HIV vaccines. The Agency’s partners in this Initiative include Health Canada, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), Industry Canada, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Also, the Agency supported the establishment of an effective second-generation HIV/AIDS surveillance system in Pakistan, which is being funded by CIDA. The information acquired through this system will be used by the Government of Pakistan to monitor the epidemic and to plan, implement and evaluate an expanded response.
The HIV Genetics Research Program continued its work in the field of molecular epidemiology, allowing researchers to use the genetic code of HIV sub-types to assist public health efforts by identifying clusters of infections, supporting outbreak investigations and informing prevention efforts for specific target groups.
The Agency worked with EKOS Research Associates to produce the HIV/AIDS Attitudinal Tracking Survey of 2006, and in partnership with Health Canada, First Nations and Inuit Health Branch (FNIHB), to produce the first HIV/AIDS Aboriginal Attitudinal Survey 2006. These surveys offered an overall picture of knowledge, attitudes and behaviours related to HIV/AIDS in Canada, and insight into the extent and causes of HIV/AIDS related stigma and discrimination, providing the foundation towards the development of the first national Agency-led HIV/AIDS social marketing campaign.
The Agency participated in a multi-stakeholder project to create a Canadian HIV Vaccines Plan which outlines a wide range of recommended actions for researchers, government, community and international organizations. This plan has been recognized internationally as one of the first country wide HIV vaccine plans that promotes a comprehensive strategy for vaccine, advocacy and funding. The Canadian HIV Vaccines Plan can be found at: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/aids-sida/pdf/publications/vaccplan_e.pdf.
Through the AIDS Community Action Program, the Agency continued to fund community-based organizations to support the delivery of HIV/AIDS prevention education, to create supportive environments for those infected with and affected by HIV/AIDS, and to increase the capacity of people living with HIV/AIDS to manage their condition through 148 projects across Canada.
During 2006-07, steps were taken to address the shared needs of discrete populations at risk of HIV infection by launching the new Specific Populations HIV/AIDS Initiative Fund. Experts and stakeholders were engaged to assist the development of Population-Specific HIV/AIDS Status Reports for gay men, for women, for Aboriginal people, and for people from countries where HIV is endemic.
Success Stories In 2006-07, the Agency’s Quebec Region provided financial support for the Refugee Project (Projet pour les réfugiées), to develop mechanisms for collaborative action adapted to refugees’ particular health needs. With partners including Royal Victoria Hospital, St Justine’s Hospital, the Centre Social d'Aide aux Immigrants, the Service d'Aide aux Réfugiés et Immigrants, and Maison Plein Coeur the project is designed to provide people living with HIV/AIDS who have applied for, or been granted refugee status, access to health services and support to develop social and community networks that will further their integration into society. Reducing social isolation is viewed as key to improving the health status of this population, and project benefits have already been noted at the local, regional and national levels. The Agency’s Ontario/Nunavut Region developed and distributed the first annual Ontario Community HIV/AIDS Reporting Tool (OCHART) reporttitled The View from the Front Lines. This report provides a summary and analysis of data collected by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-term Care and from four years of Agency-funded projects using a tool jointly developed by both levels of government. The analysis was designed to provide a general picture of HIV/AIDS prevention, care and support activity in Ontario. The report provides invaluable intelligence to the AIDS Bureau, the Agency and the funded agencies helping to understand the demand for services, identify any shifts and changes in trends and provides an evidence base for future research and prevention projects. The OCHART report may be viewed at the following link: https://www.ochart.ca/OCHART Report March (Final 2006-03-19).PDF. The Agency’s Ontario/Nunavut Region commissioned the Youth Engagement Research Unit at the University of Toronto Centre for Health Promotion to carry out an environmental scan of youth engagement activities in Ontario. Interviews were conducted with youth organizations in urban, rural and remote communities to identify existing activities and networks, with a focus on hepatitis C, HIV and sexually-transmitted infections and the determinants of health. A final report identified gaps, opportunities, successes and challenges of youth engagement activities, and provided recommendations for the development of a regional youth network. For more information see: http://www.youthvoices.ca. |
The 2006 Canadian Guidelines on Sexually Transmitted Infections, which represents the most current available knowledge on the management of sexually transmitted infections, was made available to health care professionals on the Agency website. Agency officials participated in the expert working group which developed these guidelines.
The Agency continued to monitor the infection rates of a wide range of sexually transmitted and bloodborne infections, and to undertake blood safety surveillance including building the necessary leadership, scientific expertise and infrastructure to support its ongoing core surveillance projects directed towards the collection of detailed information on:
The Agency has also undertaken efforts to broaden networks and increase knowledge transfer activity to better manage public health risks across Canada. As examples, the Agency is in the process of assessing data from Canadian hospitals related to accurate and ongoing neonatal/ paediatric transfusions as well as blood conservation for transfusion purposes. The aim is to develop better approaches, relevant risk evaluations and equations, and the development of options to better protect Canadians from existing, emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases.
The Agency used the Enhanced Surveillance of Canadian Street Youth (E-SYS) system to provide a comprehensive picture of the health of Canadian street youth. Based on data from the Enhanced Surveillance of Canadian Street Youth system, several reports were released on rates of sexually transmitted infections and blood-borne infections, risk behaviours and health determinants in this population. This surveillance pilot project, undertaken in collaboration with external stakeholders, led to the development of more effective mechanisms to reach street youth and provide testing and care for HIV, sexually transmitted infections and related infections.
Work was also conducted towards the development of data standards for sexually transmitted and bloodborne infections in order to improve national data quality and timeliness.
"Best practice" models of school-based sexual health promotion were identified so that future initiatives could be more effective.
Planned ($M) |
Authorities ($M) |
Actual ($M) |
3.7 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
What was planned
It is estimated that about 5% to 10% of all patients who enter a Canadian health care facility will develop a health care acquired (Nosocomial) infection. To address this, the Agency’s plans for 2006-07 were to:
What was achieved
The Agency reviewed, revised, and expanded the scope of its the Infection Control Guideline Series, which are widely used by health care providers, governments and other institutions to provide best-practice information on the prevention and control of infections. These guidelines now have been adapted for the entire spectrum of Canadian health care providers, such as acute care and long-term care institutions, office and outpatient care, and home care. The Guidelines can be found at: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/dpg_e.html#infection.
Revision of the Infection Control Guidelines was accomplished in collaboration with a national and multi-disciplinary steering committee, reporting to the Communicable Disease Control Expert Group (CDCEG) of the Pan-Canadian Public Health Network. The steering committee was established as an advisory and directing body to facilitate the development and maintenance of the Public Health Agency of Canada’s Infection Control Guideline Series.
The Agency advanced its work reviewing and revising, as part of the Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan (CPIP), Annex F: the Infection Control and Occupation Health Guidelines during Pandemic Influenza in Traditional and Non-Traditional Health Care Settings. The work was accomplished in collaboration with a multi-disciplinary team from across Canada.
Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is the most common cause of infectious diarrhea in hospitals in the industrialized world. During 2006-07, the Agency also completed its analysis of a previously conducted C. difficile survey, designed to identify the infection prevention and control practices that are in place in all Canadian acute care and long term care facilities. This study also determined if there were differences between infection control practices in larger or smaller hospitals as well as differences between acute care hospitals and long term care facilities. Results from the survey will allow inter-provincial/territorial comparisons of routine infection control practices and added precautions related to C. difficileassociated diarrhoea. Results will also enable single institutions to compare their infection control practices to those of similar institutions.
The Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program (CNISP) represents a collaborative effort of the Agency and of the Canadian Hospital Epidemiology Committee (CHEC), a subcommittee of the Association of Medical Microbiologists and Infectious Diseases-Canada. The objectives of CNISP are to provide rates and trends on nosocomial infections at Canadian health care facilities thus enabling comparison of rates (benchmarks), and providing evidence-based data that can be used in the development of national guidelines. CNISP network expansion in major teaching hospitals is critical towards reaching community care and long-term care facilities, in order to develop a complete national health care-acquired infection surveillance program. During 2006-07, CNISP network of sentinel hospitals expanded to 49, so that the Agency’s plan was achieved.
In summary, the Agency accomplished all activities planned for Health Care Acquired Infections in the 2006-07 Report on Plans and Priorities with the exception of revising the Guideline on Routine Practices and Additional Precautions for Preventing the Transmission of Infection in Health Care.
Planned ($M) |
Authorities ($M) |
Actual ($M) |
20.7 |
20.4 |
18.7* |
* Actual spending was $1.7 million lower than authorities due to capacity and technical constraints.
What was planned
The economic effects of diseases that can be transmitted between animals and humans (zoonotic diseases) range from lost productivity to restrictions on international trade and travel. With its specialized laboratories, the Agency is taking national leadership in addressing such diseases. During 2006-07 the Agency planned to:
What was achieved
Through the Foodborne, Waterborne and Zoonotics Infections Division and the National Microbiology Laboratory, the Agency continued research on and surveillance of the West Nile virus. Through the National West Nile Virus Surveillance Program, the Agency continued to lead the federal government's response to West Nile virus. The program coordinates overall federal, provincial and territorial West Nile virus-related activities, including surveillance, public education and awareness, and research into the ecology, spread and risk factors of the disease. This work was done in collaboration with Canada’s blood agencies.
The Agency hosted a national conference on Lyme disease, as a first step toward providing recommendations for updating existing Lyme disease guidelines.
The Agency continued its collaboration with regional health authorities across Canada in the implementation of the Canadian Network of Public Health Intelligence (CNPHI) which was expanded to provide additional Web-based resources, including outbreak summaries of foodborne and waterborne disease, web-NESP (National Enteric Surveillance Program), syndromic surveillance data, infectious disease modelling tools and West Nile virus surveillance. A special data-extraction method was used to integrate CNPHI information with existing federal, provincial, and regional public health databases while maintaining the confidentiality of personal data and respecting jurisdictional responsibilities. CNPHI was also made available to other government departments with public health links, creating broader intergovernmental integration, to facilitate the necessary collection and processing of surveillance data, dissemination of strategic information, and coordination of responses necessary to meaningfully address these public health threats.
Performing expert microbiological reference testing and carry out innovative research to improve Canada's capacity for identifying viruses, prions, and bacteria relied on Agency expertise in laboratory biosafety, which is recognized worldwide, and on the high-level containment capacity of the Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health in Winnipeg, which houses both the Agency's National Microbiology Laboratory (http://www.nml.ca/english/index.html) and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency's National Centre for Foreign Animal Disease.
Agency laboratories continued to perform such reference testing and research, which is often used to support surveillance and outbreak investigation. For example, the Agency provides routine and reference diagnostics for a wide range of zoonotic disease agents, many of which are not tested for at the provincial level. Laboratory-based surveillance documents the circulation within Canada of diseases such as Lyme disease, Q fever and hantavirus pulmonary syndrome.
Innovative research using genome-based tools was undertaken to develop methods for the rapid identification of disease agents (pathogens), for example, the use of microarrays for typing Salmonella.
Through the National Enteric Surveillance Program (NESP), the Agency continued to collect, and disseminate weekly, laboratory-based data on human gastrointestinal pathogens.
The Agency continued to study the incidence, burden, cost and risk factors, and the phenomenon of under-reporting, of infectious gastrointestinal illness in Canada.
The Agency also continued to generate, synthesize and communicate science-based information related to the prevention and control of public health risks associated with gastrointestinal infectious diseases at the human, animal and environmental interface. Significant advances were made in the Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CIPARS). Changes in data management allowed direct access to the most current data available for reporting purposes and global analysis for the stakeholders (CIPARS managers, Provincial Public Health Laboratories and Animal Health Laboratories participating in CIPARS). CIPARS surveillance findings were used as a successful policy lever whereby Quebec chicken industry groups banned the use of a specific antibiotic (ceftiofur) on hatching and day-old chicks; thus reducing drug resistance and retaining a treatment option for humans.
The Agency also continued to provide national coordination and support to the investigation and control of outbreaks of foodborne and waterborne diseases such as identification of outbreaks due to fresh produce (e.g. spinach) and their recall from retail sales.
In summary, the Agency accomplished all activities planned for Animal-to-Human (Zoonotic) Diseases in the 2006-07 Report on Plans and Priorities with the exception of leading the development of a national contingency plan for raccoon rabies and publishing fully updated guidelines on Lyme disease.
Success Story: Rift Valley Fever in Kenya In December 2006, Kenya experienced an outbreak of Rift Valley Fever (RVF) which affects humans and animals. Kenya’s Ministry of Health requested assistance from the World Health Organization (WHO), which in turn solicited diagnostic support in the form of a mobile laboratory from the Agency’s National Microbiology Laboratory. In January 2007, five scientists from the Agency were selected to participate in the mission and were deployed to Kenyas’s Garissa District - the epicentre of the outbreak. The Agency team provided guidance in carrying out health care facility-based, laboratory-based, and community-based surveillance for RVF. Support was also provided with surveillance data management, analysis, interpretation and dissemination. This work is part of the Agency's commitment to assist in public health emergencies anywhere in the world, and will help prepare Canada for similar national public health emergencies. |
Canadian Public Health Laboratories Expert Group The Agency continued to provide the official federal representation as well as secretariat, policy, technical, and financial support to the Canadian Public Health Laboratories Expert Group of the Public Health Network. This Expert Group’s role is to provide strong leadership in public health laboratory functions through the development of a proactive Federal and Provincial network of public health laboratories, as well as strategic direction in public health laboratory science and diagnostics to protect the health of Canadians. |
The Agency took steps to enhance programs in biotechnology, genomics and population health, through expanding capacity, base knowledge and technical expertise aimed at increasing response and action related to national public health threats.
Planned ($M) |
Authorities ($M) |
Actual ($M) |
284.7 |
222.6* |
211.3** |
* The difference between planned spending and authorities represents the provision of $51 million in funding to Health Canada instead the Agency for the Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control, and other funding reallocations totalling $11.1 million.
** The $11.3 million difference between authorities and actual, approximately $8.0 million was due to constraints in accommodations, staffing, and contracting which impeded reaching budgeted staff and operating levels. (Of this, approximately $2.6 million was associated with the Integrated Strategy on Healthy Living and Chronic Disease.) Also, the Agency’s regional organization was unable to use $2.3 million as planned for supporting demonstration projects. Additionally $1.0 million in resources earmarked for launch of ParticipACTION could not be utilized for this purpose.
The Agency’s comprehensive approach to health promotion and chronic disease brings together non-governmental organizations, experts, provinces and territories, and communities to improve the health of Canadians, prevent injury, and reduce the incidence of major chronic diseases such as heart disease and stroke, cancer, diabetes, and respiratory disease.
The burden of preventable death and disease in Canada has been growing, reducing quality of life, increasing wait times for care, and challenging the sustainability of the health system. And while chronic disease remains the leading cause of death and disability in Canada, up to two-thirds of the death and disability that occur prematurely could be avoided. Health promotion and risk reduction initiatives can play an important role in reducing the impact of chronic disease.
Each person has factors that determine their risk of chronic disease. Some of these, such as genetics, age and gender, cannot be changed. However, up to 80 per cent of Canadians have at least one modifiable risk factor such as unhealthy eating, unhealthy weight, physical inactivity, or smoking which could be changed to improve their health and reduce their risk of chronic disease. Obesity is of particular concern: about 65 per cent of men and 53 per cent of women did not have healthy weights in 2004 and an estimated 26 per cent of children and youth between the ages of 2 and 17 were either overweight or obese.
As the Canadian population ages and if obesity rates continue to rise, increased rates of diabetes, cancer, and cardiovascular disease can be expected. Without focused and integrated action, these and other chronic diseases will continue to place extraordinary burdens on individual Canadians and on the Canadian health care system.
The Agency supports the development of tools and resources used by communities and professionals to improve health and prevent and control chronic disease. It facilitates collaboration, networking, capacity building, and leadership in government-wide efforts to advance action, with a view to building a healthier nation, decreasing health disparities, and contributing to the sustainability of the health care system in Canada. Since its inception in 2004, the Agency has had a positive impact on the growth of chronic disease knowledge in Canada, and has influenced a more cohesive and coordinated approach to health promotion and chronic disease control by decision-makers and health professionals.
A. Chronic Disease
What was planned
The Agency planned to implement the Integrated Strategy on Healthy Living and Chronic Disease, using the $300 million over five years announced in September 2005, in collaboration with other members of the Health Portfolio, federal departments and agencies, and a range of stakeholders. To do so, the Agency planned to continue to develop and promote policies and programs which would improve the health of Canadians, reduce the impact of chronic disease, and address the key determinants of health. This included general and disease-specific approaches to address conditions that lead to unhealthy eating, physical inactivity and unhealthy weight; prevent chronic disease through concerted action on major chronic diseases and their risk factors; and support early detection and management of chronic disease.
As part of this process, the Agency planned to:
What was achieved
All items planned in the 2006-07 were successfully achieved.
The Agency launched the Canadian Best Practices Portal for Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in November 2006. Finding and using best practices is a key part of delivering effective initiatives. The Canadian Best Practices Portal (http://cbpp-pcpe.phac-aspc.gc.ca) provides an array of evidence-based best practices in health promotion and chronic disease prevention. The Portal supports decision-makers in practice, policy and research working at all levels across the country. Currently, the Portal focuses on community interventions addressing cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes and their key risk factors as well as the promotion of healthy living. Feedback from Portal users and participants at Portal awareness sessions and live demos has been very positive. The Portal received 12,200 unique visitors from its launch on November 16, 2006 to July 17, 2007. Users regularly submit nominations for best practices and suggestions regarding other resources for posting on the portal.
Tracking trends and statistics related to chronic disease in Canada supports policy makers and researchers in making more informed and more effective decisions about chronic disease prevention, control, and management. The Agency expanded its activities around the development of a national approach to chronic disease surveillance, including:
The Agency provided grants for research on risk factors for diabetes, including the numbers of Canadians exposed to different types of risk factors. By enhancing knowledge of the impact of dietary factors, physical activity, and obesity not just on diabetes, but also on cancer and cardiovascular disease, such studies enable public health officials to plan effective interventions.
Agency scientific expertise supported federal efforts related to eating disorders and obesity, policy directions and priorities on food, health claims on food, the development of nutritional indicators, and the revision of Canadian growth monitoring standards. Together, these efforts ensured that policies, programs, information, and services related to monitoring and assessment of risk factors were informed by domestic and international policy and practices, and were responsive to the needs and concerns of Canadians. Also, the Agency collaborated with Health Canada on the revised Canada’s Food Guide, which identified the connection between healthy eating behaviours (portion size, healthy choices) and decreased risk for chronic disease.
The Agency published the report How Healthy are Rural Canadians; An Assessment of their Health Status and Health Determinants (http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/rural06/index.html) examined differences in health between rural and urban Canadians, and explored disadvantages and disparities facing rural communities in Canada. The Agency also released The Human Face of Mental Health and Mental Illness in Canada 2006 (http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/human-humain06/index.html) raising awareness and increasing knowledge and understanding about mental health and mental illness in Canada. This is an update to a 2002 report, with new chapters on mental health, problematic substance use, gambling, and hospitalization.
The Agency continued the development of an enhanced mental illness surveillance system. Pilot projects were completed in five centres across the country to develop case definitions for mental illness to be used with provincial and territorial administrative databases. Work was undertaken with the Canadian Psychological Association to develop an Internet-based surveillance method to collect data from psychologists in various clinical settings. Contacts were made with companies that manage disability programs and supplementary health benefits to provide data on prescriptions for mental illness, short and long-term disability claims for mental illness, and services to psychologists.
Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention and Control Expert Group The Agency continued to provide the official federal representation as well as secretariat, policy, technical, and financial support to the Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention and Control Expert Group of the Public Health Network. This Expert Group is responsible for providing strong leadership in chronic disease and injury prevention and control through the development, recommendation and implementation of national policies, practices, guidelines and standards from a federal, provincial and territorial context. |
Cardiovascular Disease
Eight in ten Canadians have at least one risk factor (hypertension, smoking, stress, obesity, diabetes) for cardiovascular disease, and one in ten have three or more risk factors.
What was planned
In collaboration with other members of the Health Portfolio, and with provinces, territories, and key stakeholders, the Agency planned to work toward the establishment of a pan-Canadian Cardiovascular Disease Strategy and Action Plan.
What was achieved
In October, 2006, the Minister of Health announced funding to develop a heart health framework, and to address hypertension and cardiovascular disease surveillance in Canada. Development of the Canadian Heart Health Strategy and Action Plan was initiated, and common interest areas such as strengthening information systems, prevention and detection of major risk factors, timely access to care, knowledge development and translation into practice, intervention impacts and outcomes, and Aboriginal/indigenous cardiovascular health were identified. The Agency entered into a funding agreement that enabled the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada to provide administrative support to the Expert Group developing the Strategy and Action Plan.
An Expert Advisory Committee on Hypertension was established to provide scientific and expert advice to the Chief Public Health Officer. Funding was provided for a number of hypertension prevention and control projects endorsed by the Committee as making important contributions to heart health. To contribute to better consistency in the reporting of hypertension, the Agency completed several surveillance pilot projects designed to further develop and clarify case definitions.
Diabetes
Approximately 2 million Canadians live with diabetes, although as many as one third may not know they have it. Rates of type 2 diabetes, which account for approximately 90 per cent of all cases, increased by 27 per cent between 1994 and 2000. Evidence shows that type 2 diabetes can be prevented or delayed through lifestyle modification efforts to reduce weight, eat healthy food, and be physically active.
What was planned
The Agency planned to advance action on the non-aboriginal elements of the renewed Canadian Diabetes Strategy (http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/ccdpc-cpcmc/diabetes-diabete/english/strategy/index.html)by working with the Canadian Diabetes Association, provinces, territories and other national and international partners to maintain a coordinated approach to diabetes which maximizes impact and reduces duplication.
What was achieved
Ongoing commitments were made in the areas of partnership development, diabetes prevention and control, surveillance, research, community-based programming, and national coordination. Activities included:
Success Story: Primer to Action An ongoing challenge in the field of health promotion is to develop programs which address the needs of marginalised populations and which consider barriers such as poverty and social isolation. With funding from the Agency’s Canadian Diabetes Strategy program, the Ontario Chronic Disease Prevention Alliance developed a document which will help public health stakeholders develop more effective programs and policies to address chronic disease. Primer to Action: Social Determinants of Health is a resource to help health professionals, lay workers, volunteers and activists explore how the social determinants of health impact on chronic disease and how they need to be considered in the design of programs and policies. |
Cancer
Cancer is the leading cause of premature death in Canada In 2007, the number of new cases is estimated to be 159,900 and the number of deaths to be 72,700. This is an additional 6,800 new cases over the estimate for 2006.
What was planned
The Agency planned to lead the implementation of the Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control (CSCC) (http://www.cancer.ca/ccs/internet/standard/0,3182,3172_335265__langId-en,00.html) to help improve cancer screening, prevention and research activities, and to help coordinate efforts with provinces, territories and cancer care advocacy groups. The CSCC’s main objectives are to: reduce the number of new cases of cancer among Canadians; enhance the quality of life of those living with the disease; and lessen the likelihood of Canadians dying from cancer.
Other planned cancer activities included collaborating with stakeholders to address breast cancer issues ranging from prevention to palliative care through the Canadian Breast Cancer Initiative examining the implications of childhood cancer on Canada’s health care system, and addressing knowledge gaps through the Canadian Childhood Cancer Surveillance and Control Program.
What was achieved
The Agency was a key stakeholder in the development of the Canadian Strategy on Cancer Control (CSCC) and provided secretariat support to the CSCC’s Action Groups. In November 2006, the Prime Minister announced the creation of the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (CPAC), an arms length, not-for-profit entity that would be responsible for implementation of the CSCC. The Agency continued to support the work of the Action Groups and facilitated the transition of responsibility for the CSCC to the new entity. As part of this transition the Agency provided funding to enable the National Aboriginal Organizations to develop their capacity to participate in the CSCC.
The Agency contributed substantially to the publication of Canadian Cancer Statistics 2007 in collaboration with the Canadian Cancer Society and Statistics Canada. It provides current information on cancer incidence and mortality, and monitors cancer trends. Cancer in Young Adults, published jointly by Cancer Care Ontario and the Agency, reported on issues related to the exposure of young adults to carcinogens. These knowledge-building reports were developed to stimulate research, assist decision-making, and contribute to health care planning.
The Agency developed and delivered provincial training modules related to the collection of cancer stage information for breast, prostate, colorectal, lung, head and neck cancers in provincial/territorial cancer registries. The training helped to increase reporting consistency across the country, led to a more accurate national picture regarding the stages of cancer, and contributed to increased provincial cancer registry staging capacity.
Wait times, quality of life, and use of health care services are priorities in Canadian health care planning. With collaborators, the Agency initiated and completed studies examining these topics in relation to children and adolescents with cancer.
While continuing to fund breast cancer projects, the Agency consulted with key stakeholders in the breast cancer community to ensure the ongoing relevancy, timeliness, and effectiveness of its community capacity-building activities. This process was integral to understanding the needs of the community-based organizations which provide breast cancer detection and management services to Canadians. To determine programming needs, the Agency gathered and assessed information on community needs and priorities for outreach support for diverse populations, developed sustaining partnerships for networks and coalitions, and coordinated information needs for those with advanced breast cancer.
The Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance (CBCRA), the largest portion of the Canadian Breast Cancer Initiative, successfully undertook an independent evaluation. The study, which was supplemented by an External Review Panel, was very positive about CBCRA's achievements.
International Non-Communicable Disease Policy
On the international front, the Agency houses the WHO Collaborating Centre on Non-Communicable (Chronic) Disease Policy (WHOCC), under the scientific leadership of the Deputy Chief Public Health Officer. As the only collaborating centre on non-communicable disease (NCD) policy in the Americas and Europe, the Agency’s WHO Collaborating Centre has become a global centre of excellence in the analysis of chronic disease policy development and implementation.
The WHOCC was also co-leading, with the Pan American Health Organization, in the development of the Chronic Non-Communicable Disease Policy Observatory. The purpose of the observatory is to support more effective NCD related policy formulation and implementation and to create strong international and multisectoral collaboration in NCD prevention on policy development and implementation. Over the past year, the observatory boosted the technical capacity of policy analysis in a number of countries of the Americas such as Costa Rica and Brazil, and in European countries such as Russia, Slovenia and Spain.
The WHOCC, through the Deputy Chief Public Health Officer, coordinates an international policy working group on non-communicable disease policy. In this regard, over the last year, it has provided technical support to the development of the European Regional Strategy and action plan on chronic disease as well as the PAHO regional action plan on chronic disease. It has also supported the development of policy consultations and case studies on chronic disease in a number of countries in Europe and in the Americas that are participating in the WHO regional network for chronic diseases such as the Conjunto do Acciones para la Reduccion Multifactorial de las Enfermedades No Tranmisibles (CARMEN) and the Countrywide Integrated Non-communicable Disease Intervention (CINDI).
WHOCC has played an integral role in the development and signing of a Framework for Cooperation on Chronic Diseases between the WHO and Canada, the objective being to promote joint actions aimed at strengthening the global response to chronic disease. The areas of cooperation were: policy development and evaluation, development and dissemination of best practices; implementation of the Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health; Cancer prevention and control.
B. Healthy Living Strategies
Research has demonstrated that physical activity and healthy eating play a key role in improving health and preventing disease, disability and premature death. However, physical inactivity and unhealthy eating among Canadians have continued to rise, as have rates of obesity. Obesity exacerbates nearly all physical chronic conditions, significantly contributes to the incidence of chronic disease complications and can adversely affect mental health. By working collaboratively with partners and other levels of government, the Agency is committed to policies to improve the opportunities in physical activity and healthy eating and to help make healthy choices easier for all Canadians.
What was planned
In 2006-07, the Agency planned to work across the Health Portfolio, with other federal departments and agencies and in collaboration with a range of stakeholders to promote the health of Canadians by addressing the conditions that lead to unhealthy eating, physical inactivity and unhealthy weight by means of the following activities:
What was achieved
In 2006-07, the Agency continued to advance its health promotion agenda in the area of healthy living through a range of initiatives:
The Agency is responsible for co-chairing and providing secretariat support to the Healthy Living Issue Group (HLIG) which reports to the Council of the Public Health Network (Federal/Provincial/Territorial) through the Population Health Promotion Expert Group (to which the Agency also provides policy and secretariat support). The HLIG is tasked with reporting on progress in meeting the targets and outcomes contained in the Pan-Canadian Healthy Living Strategy. Both an Evaluation Working Group and a Disparities Working Group were struck in 2006 to support the work of the Issue Group.
The Issue Group continues to provide leadership for the Intersectoral Healthy Living Network and ensures that the purpose and guiding principles of the Pan-Canadian Healthy Living Strategy are upheld. The Intersectoral Healthy Living Network acts as a virtual network to bring together key players across sectors and jurisdictions on activities related to healthy living in order to advance the Pan-Canadian Healthy Living Strategy.
Through its association with the Joint Consortium for School Health (JCSH), the Agency continued to promote healthy eating and physical activity in the school setting. The JCSH provides leadership and facilitates a coordinated approach to school health by encouraging collaboration between the health and education sectors. In 2006-07, the JCSH developed draft knowledge summaries and quick scans on physical activity and nutrition to share with member provinces and territories. In addition, two national events took place: a National Conference on School Health and a national meeting on data and monitoring to discuss the need for regular, reliable and timely information for schools relating to programs, policies and the health of school-aged children.
Success Stories - Partnership Initiatives Promoting Public Health and Prevention One of the ways the Agency supports prevention program across the country is to facilitate effective evaluation and research processes with partner organizations. Some successful examples of these include the following: Supporting Evaluation of Nutrition Programs The Agency’s Alberta/Northwest Territories Region provided funding to Dieticians of Canada to review and compile a collection of reliable nutrition assessment and knowledge assessment instruments. This project will increase community practitioners’ access to high quality data collection instruments that can be used in measuring the impact of projects on nutrition knowledge and behaviours (e.g. food intake). The results of this project will be disseminated to evaluation networks in the Agency, other chronic disease related networks and to the Agency-funded projects. Affiliation of Multicultural Societies and Service Agencies The Promoting Healthy Living in BC's Multicultural Communities project was initiated and funded by the Agency to identify the public health needs and health status of multicultural communities. The project created tools, resources and directories to facilitate access to health information and services for these communities. Multicultural health fairs were held to bring professionals and members of public together to share and benefit from each other's resources and information on multicultural health. The project has partnerships with Provincial Ministries and health authorities; municipal governments; the private sector and numerous Non-Governmental Organizations. As a result of this project, Agencies in British Columbia will be better able to understand the health issues of the various cultural communities in this province and to develop more effective programs and policies. www.amssa.org/multiculturalhealthyliving/ |
Children and Adolescents
What was planned
The Agency planned to continue to provide leadership, contribute to knowledge development and exchange, and implement community-based programs through the following activities:
What was achieved
In 2006-07, the Public Health Agency of Canada continued to successfully deliver health promotion programming to pregnant women, children and families at risk for poor health outcomes through three community-based programs:
On behalf of the Minister of Health, the Agency continued to co-lead with the Department of Justice, federal government work on matters concerning the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Through its collaboration with the Inter-American Children's Institute - a special institute of the Organization of American States – the Agency contributed to the implementation of the Convention throughout the Americas.
Through the Centres of Excellence for Children's Well-Being initiative, the Agency continued to generate and disseminate the latest knowledge on children's well-being to a broad network of target audiences, including families, service providers, community groups and policy-makers. The Agency developed practical health promotion tools and provided advice to all levels of government and international organizations on the issues of early childhood development, special needs, youth engagement and child welfare to strengthen child-related policies and programs in Canada and abroad.
The Agency’s Health Behaviours of School-aged Children (HBSC) survey continued to contribute to the development of knowledge concerning the health and health behaviours of Canada’s youth. It is the only national health promotion database for this age range in Canada.
In addition, the Agency’s Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) initiative continued to develop and provide access to culturally appropriate knowledge for decision-making, as well as tools, resources, and expertise across the country. The program focuses on the prevention of future births affected by alcohol, and the improvement of outcomes for those individuals and families already affected, through: increasing public and professional capacity; developing capacities; creating effective screening, diagnosis and data reporting; expanding the knowledge base and information exchange; and increasing commitment to FASD reduction.
Success Stories: Projects Promoting the Health of Children In 2006-07, the Agency’s Quebec Region developed a bilingual online training module to promote child health and help prevent Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD). Designed as accredited training, this professional development module provides physicians with resources to assist them in addressing the issue of alcohol use among women of childbearing age. Module objectives are to facilitate participants’ understanding of the consequences of fetal alcohol exposure and develop skill in assessing alcohol consumption in women before and during pregnancy. Memorial University in Newfoundland has established a partnership with Laval University in Quebec City for category 1 accreditation to encourage Quebec physicians to take part in the program. The Quebec Heart and Stroke Foundation’s En route, en coeur (On the Road to a Happy Heart) project, which receives financial support from the Agency’s Quebec Region office, targets school aged children. In 2006-07, the project developed an Internet education program for primary and secondary level pupils on healthy living habits and diabetes. The project also developed and produced materials for a large media campaign addressing Quebec’s English-speaking minority language communities, including the Aboriginal communities, most of whom lie in rural, remote or northern settings. All of the tools developed by the project have been tested, assessed and translated for the three cycles of primary school. The project is receiving special attention from education and health circles in connection with the Écoles en santé (healthy schools) program under the Quebec Department of Education. |
Aging and Seniors
What was planned
The Agency planned to continue providing leadership on healthy aging through policy development, health promotion, research and education, partnerships and dissemination of information.
What was achieved
Canadian and global events have demonstrated the special risks faced by seniors as a vulnerable population during catastrophic events. The Agency organized the Winnipeg International Workshop on Seniors and Emergency Preparedness on February 6-9, 2007. More than 100 gerontology, emergency preparedness and health promotion experts from nine countries participated and planned future collaborative action. The workshop served to integrate seniors more fully into emergency preparedness policies and practices, and opened an important dialogue among experts, including seniors, to achieve a common understanding of the impacts of disasters on older people and the actions required to take their needs and potential contributions to the recovery of their communities into account. The Agency was presented with an international award for related efforts by Queen Elizabeth II in May 2006.
At this conference the Minister of Health announced financial support for a project from the World Health Organization titled Seniors in Emergencies: Engaging in Humanitarian Action. The funding will help further support international readiness in meeting the needs of seniors in emergency situations.
Also in collaboration with WHO, the Agency supported research on Age Friendly Cities in 32 cities around the world, four of which are in Canada (Saanich, British Columbia; Portage La Prairie, Manitoba; Sherbrooke, Québec; and Halifax, Nova Scotia). The Agency also initiated similar research with eight provinces in ten small rural communities (Alert Bay, British Columbia, Lumby, British Columbia, High Prairie, Alberta, Turtleford, Saskatchewan, Gimli, Manitoba, Township of Bonnechere Valley, Ontario, Town of Guysborough, Nova Scotia, Alberton, Prince Edward Island, Clarenville, Newfoundland and Labrador, Port Hope Simpson, Newfoundland and Labrador.
Mental Health
What was planned
The Agency planned to continue advancing mental health issues across government.
What was achieved
In 2006-07, the Agency supported the work of the Interdepartmental Task Force on Mental Health to identify ways to improve the mental health status of those populations that fall within federal jurisdiction. The Agency also responded to the Kirby Senate Committee’s final report Out of the Shadows at Last: Transforming Mental Health, Mental Illness, and Addiction Services in Canadapublished in May 2006. In addition, the Agency continued to provide secretariat support to the Federal/Provincial-Territorial Advisory Network on Mental Health (ANMH) which provides an inter-governmental forum for national collaboration and intersectoral action on mental health and mental illness.
Family Violence
What was planned
In 2006-07, the Agency planned to continue playing a central role in increasing awareness and advancing knowledge in the area of family violence.
What was achieved
The Agency was responsible for leading and coordinating the Family Violence Initiative and for managing the National Clearinghouse on Family Violence on behalf of 15 federal departments, Crown corporations and agencies (http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/ncfv-cnivf/familyviolence). The Initiative strengthens the criminal justice, housing and health systems’ response to family violence; promotes public awareness of the risk factors of family violence and the need for public involvement; and supports data collection, research and evaluation efforts.
Canadian Health Network
What was planned
The Agency planned to continue to providing the Canadian Health Network - a key information service which supports the Agency’s work in helping to build healthy communities.
What was achieved
The Agency continued to fund 20 major Canadian health organizations to deliver the Canadian Health Network (CHN) program, resulting in sustained growth in reach and network size. As of March 31, 2007, there were more than 69,000 subscribers to the newsletter (HealthLink / Bulletin santé) compared to less than 27,000 one year prior. A total number of 3,106,870 visitors accessed the CHN website in 2006-07.
Additional Health Promotion Activities
Other examples of the Agency’s health promotion activities during 2006-07 include:
A strong public health system requires a deep, cross-jurisdictional human resources capacity, effective dissemination of knowledge and information systems, and a public health law and policy system that evolves in response to changes in public needs and expectations. The Agency’s contributes to all these areas through the following key initiatives:
Planned ($M) |
Authorities ($M) |
Actual ($M) |
10.9 |
10.8 |
10.4 |
What was planned
In 2006-07 the Agency intended to:
What was achieved
In 2006-07, the Agency continued to support the Public Health Human Resource Task Group of the Pan-Canadian Public Health Network. An Enumeration Working Group was formed to address the limitations of public health workforce data reported at the regional, provincial, and national levels. Stakeholders including jurisdictions, disciplines, national data agencies, and federal partners agreed in principle to jointly work with the Agency and the Task Group to address these limitations.
Clear statements of core competencies for public health will enable Canadian jurisdictions to strengthen the public health workforce. In 2006-07, the Agency began to conduct consultations on these core competencies. Activities included an online survey, which had 1,606 respondents from across Canada. Regional consultations held with the public health community in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba helped to identify opportunities, challenges, and strategies for implementation; and identify roles and responsibilities. Work with public health discipline groups including nurses, health inspectors/environmental health officers, epidemiologists, medical officers, dentists/ dental hygienists, nutritionists/dieticians and health promoters/educators helped to focus on discipline-specific competencies.
In addition to expanding the intake from 13 in 2005-06 to 15 in 2006-07 the Canadian Field Epidemiology Program (CFEP) (http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/cfep-pcet/index.html) increased its offering of external seats for public health practitioners in its training modules. The program also successfully piloted a new module on Rapid Assessment for Complex Emergencies.
To address the learning needs of front-line public health practitioners the Agency launched two modules - Introduction to Public Health Surveillance and Applied Epidemiology: Injuries - bringing the number of modules in the Skills Enhancement for Public Health program to seven. Other new modules including Communicating Data Effectively, Basic Biostatistics, and Principles & Practices of Public Health, were piloted. Registration increased as new modules were added and awareness of the program grew - a total of 1456 participants completed at least 1 module in 2006-07. Also, thirty additional online facilitators were trained to further build capacity.
The Agency partnered with Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) to provide grants to fifteen successful Doctoral Research and Fellowship applicants, and to fund 20 universities for Master's in Public Health programs.
To prepare a comprehensive professional development plan for its staff, a working group was formed to look at training needed to support public health practice done by the Agency. Through interviews and focus groups, training needs were identified for key professional groups. The Agency created a pilot Public Health Practice Learning Calendar offering competency based training and education to staff. An intranet site, Learning @PHAC, was launched to consolidate learning and training resources at the Agency.
In summary, the Agency accomplished all activities planned for Building Public Health Human Resource Capacity in the 2006-07 Report on Plans and Priorities with the exception of developing databases on public health human resources.
Planned ($M) |
Authorities ($M) |
Actual ($M) |
6.1 |
15.1* |
15.1 |
* The difference between planned and authorities reflects the funding received for the National Collaborating Centres Contribution Program.
What was planned
The Agency planned to:
What was achieved
All these plans were fulfilled as the Agency develop information about public health knowledge and information systems, to increase and exchange knowledge in this area, and to leverage the information and knowledge into effective action.
The Agency continued to maintain and support the iPHIS product, and made the Outbreak Management module available to jurisdictions across Canada. The Agency also worked to investigate a data migration strategy for iPHIS-deployed jurisdictions to the planned successor (Infoway Panorama) solution.
Throughout 2006-07 the Agency provided expert resources to the Infoway Electronic Public Health System (now known as Panorama) project. By participating in forums including Design working groups, Pan-Canadian Standards Group, Implementation Working Group, Steering Committee, Product Management Committee, Joint Implementation Leads, the Agency transferred the knowledge gained by past work in the development of case management tools usage by Federal, Provincial, and territorial officials.
As of March 2007, the Agency’s GIS Infrastructure (http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/php-psp/gis_e.html) tools, data, services and training supported 361 public health professionals ("clients") from 141 public health organizations across Canada. All 361 clients were members of the online GIS community known as the Map and Data Exchange. The Agency continued to support a variety of initiatives across Canada through the provision of data and spatial services.
Surveillance and Information Expert Group
The Agency continued to provide the official federal representation as well as secretariat, policy, technical, and financial support to the Surveillance and Information Expert Group of the Public Health Network. This Expert Group is responsible for providing coordination and leadership for public health surveillance, information collection, analysis and sharing, and knowledge dissemination across Canada from a federal, provincial and territorial context. |
The Public Health Agency of Canada Act mandates the Chief Public Health Officer to submit a report to parliament on the State of Public Health in Canada, with the first Report to be tabled by or before January 2008. During 2006-07, the Agency established working groups responsible for consultations, compilation of information for the Report, and provision of technical advice. The Agency hosted consultative meetings on Storyline Development, Lessons Learned and Health Inequalities, with internal and external stakeholders. Background research, framing exercises and content development were initiated and extensive stakeholder consultations were undertaken
All six of the Agency-funded National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health were in place:
NCC focus |
Location |
Environmental health |
BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver |
Aboriginal health |
University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George |
Infectious diseases |
International Centre for Infectious Diseases, Winnipeg |
Public health methods and tools |
McMaster University, Hamilton |
Healthy public policy |
Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Montréal |
Determinants of health |
St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish |
The NCCs connected with public health policy-makers, researchers and practitioners through environmental scans of stakeholders in their respective priority areas, and participated in educational and research fora to determine the knowledge needs of frontline public health practitioners, identify knowledge gaps, and develop knowledge communities. The NCCs collaborated with each other and external partners to synthesize existing research, develop reports and tools for their user groups, and develop knowledge transfer approaches through participation in events such as Annual Canadian Public Health Conference and the 5th Annual Cochrane Symposium. As part of their mandate of transferring knowledge among public health stakeholders, the NCCs will hold their 2nd Annual Summer Institute in Nova Scotia, August 2007.
Planned ($M) |
Authorities ($M) |
Actual ($M) |
3.3 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
What was planned
Expert reports from the Naylor Commission (Learning from SARS: Renewal of Public Health in Canada) and the Kirby Commission (Reforming Health Protection and Promotion in Canada: Time to Act) urged federal, provincial and territorial stakeholders to collaborate on the development of agreements that would provide for effective surveillance through common standards and practices for information sharing and public health responses.
During 2006-07 the Agency planned to continue to take an active role with its provincial and territorial partners in harmonizing legislation and developing and implementing policies, practices and mechanisms that comply with privacy rights yet allow better collection, use and sharing of key health information for the prevention and control of communicable diseases and health emergencies.
The International Health Regulations, adopted in 2005, outlined the need for a strong legal foundation for public health practice at all levels of government. Having this in place is crucial for Canada's capacity to respond to new and re-emerging public health threats. To address this, the Agency planned to undertake activities such as specialized workshops and discussions for the dissemination of targeted research and analysis in public health law.
What was achieved
These plans were completed. The Agency developed information about public health law, and information policies, increased and exchanged knowledge in this area, and leveraged the information and knowledge into effective action.
In November 2006, the Agency played a major role in delivering the first Canadian Conference on the Public’s Health and the Law, which brought together some of the most respected Canadian and international public health law expertise to review progress and consider future challenges including planning for Pandemics. The conference strengthened public health capacity by promoting an enhanced understanding of the application of various legal and policy instruments in public health, and by fostering professional and linkages across disciplines.
The Agency held specialized workshops and discussions with key provincial, territorial and international agencies and stakeholders to collaborate on common challenges, identify common problems and disseminate the results of targeted research and analysis in public health law. The Agency also collaborated with leading researchers in public health law and shared the results of this research through the Public Health Law Improvement Network.
The Agency took an active role in enhancing the integration of ethical considerations into public health decision-making by collaborating and taking the first steps to facilitate a National Roundtable on Public Health and Ethics.
Planned ($M) |
Authorities ($M) |
Actual ($M) |
12.9 |
12.8 |
12.3* |
* Actual spending was $0.5 million lower than authorities due to capacity and technical constraints.
The Public Health Agency of Canada recognizes that strategic and developmental initiatives are required to support the achievement of its priorities and advance the work of improving public health.
What was planned
The Agency intended:
What was achieved
All the planned initiatives were undertaken.
Health surveillance supports disease prevention, and enables public health professionals to manage outbreaks and threats. Public Health Surveillance – the ongoing, systematic use of routinely-collected health data to guide public health actions - has been identified as a priority area for the Agency in its Strategic Plan, and a senior multidisciplinary task group was launched during March 2007 to begin the review of the Agency’s surveillance infrastructure components.
The Agency continued to provide key surveillance programs during 2006-07. In collaboration with the Canadian Institute for Health Information and the Canadian Public Health Initiative and many other organizations, the Agency delivered surveillance programs including:
The Agency continued to represent the Federal government in the Pan-Canadian Public Health Network and to provide secretariat, policy, technical, and financial support to it. The Network, whose creation was announced by the Federal-Provincial-Territorial Ministers of Health in April, 2005, was established to provide a new, more collaborative approach to public health. Improved communication and collaboration, particularly critical during public health emergencies such as SARS or pandemic influenza, will also assist Canada in addressing serious public health issues such as obesity and non-communicable disease.
The Agency’s Chief Public Health Officer is the federal co-chair of the Public Health Network’s governing Council. In addition, Agency personnel represent the federal government on each of the groups reporting to the Network.
In 2006-07 the Public Health Network focussed on three key areas:
The Public Health Network has proven to be a key mechanism for collaboration between federal, provincial and territorial governments, and an effective vehicle for advancing a Canadian public health agenda. Progress made during 2006-07 included:
In addition, significant progress was made on development of joint agreements respecting roles and responsibilities in pandemic preparedness and response, information sharing, and the sharing of resources, facilities and personnel.
Actions to create a foundation for the development of a Pan-Canadian Public Health Strategy, to be overseen by the Pan-Canadian Public Health Network, included strengthening the policy base in the Agency’s regions to contribute to the intelligence cycle. The expanded regional work of gathering, analyzing and providing advice on public health information within the provincial and territorial jurisdictions allowed the Agency to develop an emerging profile and understanding of the public health environment in Canada, and contributed to the Agency's ability to identify current initiatives, gaps, and vulnerabilities.
The Agency strengthened its partnership with the World Health Organization (WHO) Commission on Social Determinants of Health through contributing knowledge and expertise that helped to shape the direction and recommendations to be contained in its Interim Statement and Final Report, and also by funding two Knowledge Networks to synthesize global evidence for policy and action. Further, the Agency collaborated with the Commission on the planning of the 8th WHO Commission meeting (to be held in Canada). The Agency contributed to Canada’s leadership role with WHO and member states on intersectoral action, reporting on cross-government and cross-sectoral approaches to advance policy and action on health inequalities, and also in engaging other countries and WHO in an initiative to examine the economic benefits of investing in the determinants of health.
The Agency supported the work of the Canadian Reference Group (CRG) to contribute to the WHO Commission’s plan of work and to advance related initiatives here in Canada. During 2006-07, the CRG has initiated work on Canadian case studies of effective intersectoral action, led the development of case studies in 23 other countries, and engaged with Civil Society on how to best address the social determinants of health.
As a step towards the establishment of a Health Portfolio Plan, the Agency developed a draft action framework to outline its leadership role in advancing federal action on the social determinants of health and the beginning of an integrated approach within the Health Portfolio. This work, when enhanced through the knowledge to be gained from the WHO Commission and Canadian Reference Group work, will lead to further interdepartmental collaboration. The Agency initiated working relationships and knowledge sharing with other departments, private sector partners and other levels of government through its participation in the Conference Board of Canada’s Roundtable on the Socio-Economic Determinants of Health.
The Agency supported preparations for the World Conference on Health Promotion and Education (to be held in Vancouver in June 2007). During 2006-07, the Agency coordinated the Health Portfolio’s lead role in this event and organized sessions and speakers to profile Canadian experiences with a global audience and learn from other countries.
The Agency continued developing an international strategic framework to support internationally focused initiatives to strengthen public health security, strengthen international efforts to build capacity in public health systems, and reduce the global burdens of disease and health disparity.
Planned ($M) |
Authorities ($M) |
Actual ($M) |
109.0 |
120.5* |
119.0 |
* The $11.5 million difference between planned and authorities represents primarily operating budget carry forward received in the Supplementary Estimates (A). The Agency was able to use of $11.0 million of this to address IM/IT infrastructure requirements, comply with mandatory government-wide IT security policy, and respond to a computer malware infection.
Other Agency programs and services consisted primarily of corporate support and administration in the National Capital Region, Winnipeg and the Agency’s regional offices (Atlantic, Quebec, Ontario & Nunavut, Manitoba & Saskatchewan, Alberta & Northwest Territories, British Columbia & Yukon). Under an interdepartmental agreement, Health Canada’s Northern Region office was also responsible for administering some of the Agency’s programs in Canada’s territories. Planned expenditures included $28.0 million for the facility services and the support of the National Microbiology Laboratory; $48.4 million for the corporate support in Human Resources, Communications, Legal, Finance, Real Property and Administration Services, Information Technology and Management; $4.3 million for support in Strategic Policy and Development and $17.9 million for regional support operations across Canada. Planned funding also included $10.4 million held in a frozen allotment pending approval for a one-year extension.
Actual expenditures included $37.1 million for the facility services and the support of the National Microbiology Laboratory; $69.3 million for the corporate support in Human Resources, Communications, Legal, Finance, Real Property and Administration Services, Information Technology and Management; and $11.1 million for regional support operations across Canada.
(in millions of dollars)
This table offers a comparison of the Main estimates, Planned Spending, Total Authorities and Actual Spending for the recently completed fiscal year, as well as historical figures for Actual Spending.
|
2004–05 |
2005–06 |
2006–07 |
|||
Main |
Planned |
Total |
Total Actuals |
|||
Population and Public Health |
586.7 |
477.2 |
506.6 |
629.7 |
536.2 |
510.8 |
Total |
586.7 |
477.2 |
506.6 |
629.7** |
536.2*** |
510.8**** |
Less: Non‑respendable revenue |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
Plus: Cost of services received without charge |
11.4 |
17.6 |
0.0 |
20.2 |
20.2 |
21.0 |
Total Departmental Spending |
598.1 |
494.6 |
506.6 |
649.9 |
556.4 |
531.5 |
Full-time Equivalents * |
1,666 |
1,801 |
2,119 |
2,119 |
2,119 |
2,050 |
* Full-time equivalents (FTE) are a measure of human resource consumption based on average levels of employment. FTEs are not subject to Treasury Board control but are disclosed in Part III of the Estimates in support of personnel expenditure requirements specified in the Estimates.
** The $123.1 million increase from Main Estimates to Planned Spending is due to increased funding for initiatives announced in Federal budgets such as: Avian and Pandemic Influenza Preparedness ($66.3 million); Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control ($52 million); Strengthening Canada’s Public Health Systems ($4.2 million); one year extension for the Centre of Excellence for Children’s Well Being ($1.8 million); offset by savings in procurement resulting from the ERC exercise ($1.2 million).
*** The $93.5 million decrease from Planned Spending to Total Authorities is mainly due to funding for Avian and Pandemic Influenza Preparedness deferred to subsequent fiscal years ($44 million); and funding for Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control provided to Health Canada instead of the Agency ($51 million).
**** The $25.4 million difference between Total Authorities and Actual Spending is mainly the result of lapses in operating expenditure of $20.5 million and transfer payments of $4.9 million.
This table reflects how resources were used within the Public Health Agency of Canada by appropriation and by program activity.
(in millions of dollars)
2006–07 Budgetary | ||||||
|
Operating |
Grants |
Contributions |
Total: Gross Budgetary Expenditures |
Less: |
Total: Net Budgetary |
Population and Public Health |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Main Estimates |
327.4 |
33.1 |
146.2 |
506.7 |
(0.1) |
506.6 |
Planned Spending |
392.7 |
89.1 |
148.0 |
629.8 |
(0.1) |
629.7 |
Total Authorities |
349.3 |
22.6 |
164.4 |
536.3 |
(0.1) |
536.2 |
Actual Spending |
328.7 |
21.0 |
161.2 |
510.9 |
(0.1) |
510.8 |
(in millions of dollars)
Vote or Statutory Item |
Truncated Vote or Statutory Wording |
2006–07 |
|||
Main |
Planned |
Total |
Total Actuals |
||
35 |
Operating expenditures |
299.3 |
363.4 |
326.0 |
305.4 |
40 |
Grants and contributions |
179.3 |
237.1 |
187.0 |
182.2 |
(S) |
Contributions to employee benefit plans |
28.0 |
29.2 |
23.2 |
23.2 |
(S) |
Spending of proceeds from the disposal of surplus Crown assets Actual = $1,286.81 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
506.6 |
629.7 |
536.2 |
510.8 |
(in millions of dollars)
|
2006–07 |
Accommodation provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada |
9,4 |
Contributions covering the employer’s share of employees’ insurance premiums and expenditures paid by the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. |
11.5 |
Salary and associated expenditures of legal services provided by the Department of Justice Canada |
0.1 |
Total 2006–07 Services received without charge |
21.0 |
Respendable Revenue (in millions of dollars)
|
Actual |
Actual |
2006–07 |
|||
Main |
Planned |
Total |
Actual |
|||
Population and Public Health Sale to federal and provincial/territorial departments and agencies, airports and other federally regulated organizations of first aid kits to be used in disaster and emergency situations |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Spending of proceeds from the disposal of surplus Crown assets |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Total Respendable Revenue |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Non-respendable Revenue (in million of dollars)
|
Actual |
Actual |
2006–07 |
|||
Main |
Planned |
Total |
Actual |
|||
Population and Public Health Sale of first aid kits / net vote revenue surplus |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Royalties and other miscellaneous revenues |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
Sundries – credit cards rebate |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
Total Non-respendable Revenue |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
(in millions of dollars)
|
Population and Public Health |
Agency Executive, Chief Public Health Officer* |
|
Planned Spending |
8.8 |
Actual Spending |
4.8 |
Infectious Disease and Emergency Preparedness Branch** |
|
Planned Spending |
219.1 |
Actual Spending |
161.8 |
Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch*** |
|
Planned Spending |
153.7 |
Actual Spending |
81.9 |
Strategic Policy, Communications and Corporate Services Branch**** |
|
Planned Spending |
64.5 |
Actual Spending |
81.0 |
Public Health Practice and Regional Operations Branch |
|
Planned Spending |
183.6 |
Actual Spending |
181.3 |
Agency Total |
|
Planned Spending |
629.7 |
Actual Spending |
510.8 |
The major differences between Planned and Actual spending are:
* Agency Executive, Chief Public Health Officer: The $4.0 million lapse was due to capacity and technical constraints in staffing coupled with deferment of Pandemic initiatives to future years.
** Infectious Disease and Emergency Preparedness Branch: Funding for Avian and Pandemic Influenza Preparedness deferred to subsequent fiscal years of $44 million; and funding reallocated to other branches $6.6 million leaving a small lapse of $6.7 million.
*** Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch: $51 million of funding for the Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control was approved under Health Canada as opposed to the Agency as originally envisioned; $15.4 million was allocated to other branches for new unplanned priorities; $5.4 million lapsed due to delays and timing changes; and uncertainty of funding by Governor General Special Warrants earlier in the fiscal year included the need to cash manage close to $3 million to operate the Centre of Excellence for Children which was not funded.
**** Strategic Policy, Communications and Corporate Services Branch: Operating Budget carry forward from 2005-06 provided $11.7 million, and funding transferred from other branches provided $4.8 million to cover new emerging pressures.
|
|
|
|
2006–07 |
Planning Years |
||||||
A. User Fee |
Fee Type |
Fee-setting |
Date Last |
Forecast Revenue |
Actual Revenue |
Full Cost |
Performance |
Performance Results |
Fiscal Year |
Forecast Revenue |
Estimated Full Cost |
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA) |
Other products and services (O) |
Access to Information Act |
1992 |
See Section C – Other Information Note 1 |
See Section C – Other Information Note 1 |
See Section C – Other Information Note 1 |
Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request: response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days of receipt of request. |
See Section C – Other Information Note 1 |
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 |
0.7 0.8 0.9 |
580 580 580 |
B. Date Last Modified |
|||||||||||
C. Other Information 1. Access to Information requests filed for the Public Health Agency of Canada in 2006-07 were processed by Health Canada. Accordingly, associated revenues and costs are reported under Health Canada for 2006-07. |
Information on Service Standards for External Fees can be found at: http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp
The following is a summary of the transfer payment programs for the Agency that are in excess of $5 million. All the transfer payments shown below are voted programs.
Supplementary information on these Transfer Payment Programs can be found at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp.
Canada Health Infoway Inc. (Infoway) is an independent not-for-profit corporation with a mandate to foster and accelerate the development and adoption of electronic health information systems and compatible standards and communications technologies across Canada. Infoway is also a collaborative mechanism in which the federal, provincial and territorial governments participate as equals, toward a common goal of modernizing Canada’s health information systems. The Public Health Agency of Canada’s portion under this collaboration is the Health Surveillance Program. Health Canada has provided the Supplementary Information on their and the Public Health Agency of Canada’s conditional grants to Infoway.
Further information on this Conditional Grant can be found at: http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp .
The following Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accrual accounting principles. The information presented in the other financial tables of this Performance Report were prepared on a modified cash basis of accounting in order to be consistent with appropriations-based reporting. Note 3 of the financial statements reconciles these two accounting methods.
PUBLIC HEALTH AGENCY OF CANADA
For the year ended March 31 |
2007 |
2006 |
(in dollars) |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
183,791,847 |
170,341,797 |
Transfer payments |
181,361,341 |
175,244,575 |
Professional and special services |
70,287,779 |
55,138,587 |
Utilities, material and supplies |
37,356,355 |
41,351,299 |
Travel and relocation |
17,485,034 |
15,793,168 |
Accommodation |
12,884,158 |
11,961,621 |
Purchased repair and maintenance |
8,887,103 |
6,019,930 |
Information |
8,623,347 |
4,599,372 |
Amortization of tangible capital assets |
6,920,987 |
6,263,550 |
Communication |
5,287,798 |
4,748,297 |
Rentals |
1,428,167 |
1,307,661 |
Other |
1,784,117 |
1,180,989 |
|
536,098,033 |
493,950,846 |
Revenues |
|
|
Sales of goods and services |
|
|
Rights and Privileges |
28,377 |
25,376 |
Services of a Non-Regulatory Nature |
88,871 |
125,742 |
Interest |
7,948 |
11,890 |
Other |
216,299 |
105,106 |
|
341,495 |
268,114 |
Net cost of operations |
535,756,538 |
493,682,732 |
The accompanying notes form an integral part of the financial statements
PUBLIC HEALTH AGENCY OF CANADA
At March 31 |
2007 |
2006 |
(in dollars) |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Financial assets |
|
|
Accounts receivable and advances (Note 4) |
8,067,818 |
5,884,928 |
Total financial assets |
8,067,818 |
5,884,928 |
Non-financial assets |
|
|
Tangible capital assets (Note 5) |
63,517,725 |
65,742,171 |
Total non-financial assets |
63,517,725 |
65,742,171 |
TOTAL |
71,585,543 |
71,627,099 |
Liabilities and Equity of Canada |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
94,035,266 |
79,975,372 |
Vacation pay and compensatory leave |
8,432,076 |
7,387,369 |
Employee severance benefits (Note 6) |
28,512,678 |
24,109,715 |
Other liabilities |
2,763,581 |
2,402,497 |
|
133,743,602 |
113,874,953 |
Equity of Canada |
(62,158,058) |
(42,247,854) |
TOTAL |
71,585,543 |
71,627,099 |
Contractual Obligations (Note 7)
The accompanying notes form an integral part of the financial statements
PUBLIC HEALTH AGENCY OF CANADA
For the year ended at March 31 (in dollars) |
2007 |
2006 |
Equity of Canada, beginning of year |
(42,247,854) |
(10,242,764) |
Net cost of operations |
(535,756,538) |
(493,682,732) |
Current year appropriations used (Note 3) |
510,812,401 |
477,166,397 |
Refund of previous year expenditures |
(3,259,280) |
(6,413,953) |
Revenue not available for spending (Note 3) |
(296,270) |
(193,247) |
Change in net position in the Consolidated Revenue Fund (Note 3) |
(10,828,711) |
(26,481,555) |
Services provided without charge by other government departments (Note 8) |
19,418,194 |
17,600,000 |
Equity of Canada, end of year |
(62,158,058) |
(42,247,854) |
The accompanying notes form an integral part of the financial statements
PUBLIC HEALTH AGENCY OF CANADA
For the year ended March 31 (in dollars) |
2007 |
2006 |
Operating activities |
|
|
Net cost of operations |
535,756,538 |
493,682,732 |
Non-cash items: |
|
|
Amortization of tangible capital assets (Note 5) |
(6,920,987) |
(6,263,550) |
Gain (loss) on disposal of tangible capital assets |
(14,112) |
12,367 |
Services provided without charge by other government departments (Note 8) |
(19,418,194) |
(17,600,000) |
Variations in Statement of Financial Position: |
|
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts receivable and advances |
2,182,890 |
5,052,368 |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(14,059,894) |
(31,934,371) |
Decrease (increase) in other liabilities |
(361,084) |
(397,025) |
Decrease (increase) in vacation pay and compensatory leave |
(1,044,707) |
(763,019) |
Decrease (increase) in employee severance benefits |
(4,402,963) |
(4,374,271) |
Cash used by operating activities |
491,717,487 |
437,415,231 |
Capital investment activities |
|
|
Acquisitions of tangible capital assets (Note 5) |
4,711,940 |
6,674,778 |
Proceeds on disposal of tangible capital assets |
(1,287) |
(12,367) |
Cash used by investment activities |
4,710,653 |
6,662,411 |
Financing activities |
|
|
Net cash provided by Government of Canada |
(496,428,140) |
(444,077,642) |
The accompanying notes form an integral part of the financial statements
The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) was created as a new agency by orders in council on September 24, 2004 in response to growing concerns about the capacity of Canada's public health system to anticipate and respond effectively to public health threats. Its creation is the result of wide consultation with the provinces, territories, stakeholders and Canadians. It also follows recommendations from leading public health experts - including Dr. David Naylor's report, Learning from SARS: Renewal of Public Health in Canada, as well as other Canadian and international reports - for clear federal leadership on issues concerning public health and improved collaboration within and between jurisdictions. The Public Health Agency of Canada Act, assented to December 12, 2006, provides a statutory foundation for the new agency.
The agency is mandated to work in collaboration with its partners, to lead federal efforts and to mobilize pan-Canadian action in preventing disease and injury, and to promote and protect national and international public health through the following:
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Treasury Board accounting policies which are consistent with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles for the public sector.
Significant accounting policies are as follows:
(a) Parliamentary appropriations
The agency is financed by the Government of Canada through Parliamentary appropriations. Appropriations provided to the agency do not parallel financial reporting according to Canadian generally accepted accounting principles since appropriations are primarily based on cash flow requirements. Consequently, items recognized in the statement of operations and the statement of financial
position are not necessarily the same as those provided through appropriations from Parliament. Note 3 provides a high-level reconciliation between the two bases of reporting.
(b) Net Cash Provided by Government
The agency operates within the Consolidated Revenue Fund (CRF), which is administered by the Receiver General for Canada. All cash received by the agency is deposited to the CRF and all cash disbursements made by the agency are paid from the CRF. The net cash provided by Government is the difference between all cash receipts and all cash disbursements including transactions between
departments of the federal government.
(c) Change in net position in the Consolidated Revenue Fund
The change in net position in the Consolidated Revenue Fund is the difference between the net cash provided by Government and appropriations used in a year, excluding the amount of non respendable revenue recorded by the agency. It results from timing differences between when a transaction affects appropriations and when it is processed through the CRF.
(d) Revenues
Revenues are accounted for in the period in which the underlying transaction or event occurred that gave rise to the revenues.
(e) Expenses
Expenses are recorded on an accrual basis:
(f) Employee future benefits
(g) Accounts receivable
Accounts receivable are stated at amounts expected to be ultimately realized. They are mainly comprised of amounts to be recovered from other government departments and the recovery is considered certain. As a result, no provision has been recorded as an offset against these amounts.
(h) Contingent liabilities
Contingent liabilities are potential liabilities which may become actual liabilities when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. To the extent that the future event is likely to occur or fail to occur, and a reasonable estimate of the loss can be made, an estimated liability is accrued and an expense recorded. If the likelihood is not determinable or an amount cannot be
reasonably estimated, the contingency is disclosed in the notes to the financial statements.
(i) Tangible Capital Assets
All tangible capital assets having an initial cost of $10,000 or more are recorded at their acquisition cost. The agency does not capitalize intangibles, works of art and historical treasures that have cultural, aesthetic or historical value, assets located on Indian Reserves and museum collections.
Amortization of tangible capital assets is done on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset as follows:
Asset Class |
|
Buildings |
25 years |
Works and infrastructure |
25 years |
Machinery and equipment |
8-12 years |
Computer equipment |
3-5 years |
Computer software |
3 years |
Other Equipment |
10-12 years |
Motor Vehicles |
4-7 years |
Other Vehicles |
10 years |
(j) Measurement uncertainty
The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with Treasury Board accounting policies which are consistent with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles for the public sector requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses reported in the financial statements. At the time of preparation of these statements, management believes the estimates and assumptions to be reasonable. The most significant items where estimates are used are the liability for employee severance benefits and the useful life of tangible capital assets. Actual results could significantly differ from those estimated.
Management's estimates are reviewed periodically and, as adjustments become necessary, they are recorded in the financial statements in the year they become known.
The agency receives most of its funding through annual Parliamentary appropriations. Items recognized in the statement of operations and the statement of financial position in one year may be funded through Parliamentary appropriations in prior, current or future years. Accordingly, the agency has different net cost of operations for the year on a government funding basis than on an accrual accounting basis. The differences are reconciled in the following tables:
(in dollars) |
2007 |
2006 |
Net cost of operations |
535,756,538 |
493,682,732 |
Adjustments for items affecting net cost of operations but not affecting appropriations: |
|
|
Add (Less): |
|
|
Amortization of tangible capital assets |
(6,920,987) |
(6,263,550) |
Services provided without charge by other government departments |
(19,418,194) |
(17,600,000) |
Revenues not available for spending |
296,270 |
193,247 |
Refund/Adjustment of previous years expenses |
3,259,280 |
6,413,953 |
Gain (loss) on disposal of tangible capital assets |
(14,112) |
12,367 |
Proceeds on disposal of tangible capital assets |
(1,287) |
(12,367) |
Allowance for Contingent Liabilities |
(350,000) |
0 |
Vacation pay and compensatory leave |
(1,044,707) |
(763,019) |
Decrease (increase) in severance benefits |
(4,402,963) |
(4,374,270) |
Justice Canada legal fees |
(1,022,689) |
(808,786) |
Other non appropriated amounts |
(36,688) |
11,312 |
|
(29,656,077) |
(23,191,113) |
Adjustments for items not affecting net cost of operations but affecting appropriations: |
|
|
Add (Less): |
|
|
Acquisitions of tangible capital assets |
4,711,940 |
6,674,778 |
|
4,711,940 |
6,674,778 |
Current year appropriations used |
510,812,401 |
477,166,397 |
(in dollars) |
2007 |
2006 |
Operating expenditures - Vote 35 (2006 Vote 30) |
299,278,000 |
234,719,000 |
Supplementary Vote 35a |
30,730,105 |
0 |
Supplementary Vote 35b |
0 |
0 |
Governor General's Special Warrants |
0 |
59,164,660 |
Grants and contributions - Vote 40 (2006 Vote 35) |
179,306,000 |
164,009,000 |
Supplementary Vote 40a |
6,018,366 |
0 |
Supplementary Vote 40b |
0 |
0 |
Governor General's Special Warrants |
0 |
645,000 |
Transfer from Treasury Board - Vote 5 |
293,605 |
15,415,000 |
Transfer from TB - Vote 10 |
(62,500) |
0 |
Transfer from TB - Vote 15 |
(1,635,000) |
0 |
Total Voted Parliamentary Appropriations |
513,928,576 |
473,952,660 |
Lapsed appropriations: |
(26,306,443) |
(19,842,269) |
Total Voted Parliamentary Appropriations Used |
487,622,133 |
454,110,391 |
Contributions to employee benefit plans |
23,188,745 |
23,043,639 |
Spending of proceeds from the disposal of surplus Crown assets |
1,287 |
12,367 |
Collection Agency Fees |
236 |
0 |
Current year appropriations used |
510,812,401 |
477,166,397 |
(in dollars) |
2007 |
2006 |
Net cash provided by Government |
496,428,140 |
444,077,642 |
Revenue not available for spending |
296,270 |
193,247 |
Refund/Adjustment of previous years expenses |
3,259,280 |
6,413,953 |
Change in net position in the Consolidated Revenue Fund |
|
|
Variation in accounts receivable and advances |
(2,182,890) |
(5,052,368) |
Variation in accounts payables and accrued liabilities |
13,709,894 |
31,934,371 |
Variation in other liabilities |
361,084 |
397,025 |
Justice Canada legal fees |
(1,022,689) |
(808,786) |
Other adjustments |
(36,688) |
11,313 |
Change in net position in the Consolidated Revenue Fund |
10,828,711 |
26,481,555 |
Current year appropriations used |
510,812,401 |
477,166,397 |
(in dollars) |
2007 |
2006 |
Receivables from other Federal Government departments and agencies |
6,667,560 |
4,724,495 |
Receivables from external parties |
1,376,712 |
1,142,623 |
Employee advances |
23,546 |
17,810 |
|
8,067,818 |
5,884,928 |
Cost |
Opening Balance |
Acquisitions |
Disposals |
Closing balance |
(in dollars) |
|
|
|
|
Land |
604,137 |
0 |
0 |
604,137 |
Buildings |
71,681,239 |
60,000 |
0 |
71,741,239 |
Works and Infrastructure |
564,425 |
0 |
0 |
564,425 |
Machinery and Equipment |
35,725,663 |
3,838,279 |
(439,289) |
39,124,653 |
Computer Equipment |
2,957,453 |
116,879 |
0 |
3,074,332 |
Computer Software |
896,107 |
145,954 |
0 |
1,042,061 |
Other Equipment |
1,749,379 |
550,828 |
0 |
2,300,207 |
Motor Vehicles |
129,190 |
0 |
0 |
129,190 |
Other Vehicles |
84,253 |
0 |
0 |
84,253 |
|
114,391,846 |
4,711,940 |
(439,289) |
118,664,497 |
Accumulated Amortization |
Opening Balance |
Acquisitions |
Disposals |
Closing balance |
(in dollars) |
|
|
|
|
Buildings |
25,795,047 |
2,866,990 |
0 |
28,662,037 |
Works and Infrastructure |
24,479 |
22,577 |
0 |
47,056 |
Machinery and Equipment |
20,312,096 |
3,069,295 |
(423,890) |
22,957,501 |
Computer Equipment |
1,524,612 |
543,163 |
0 |
2,067,775 |
Computer Software |
571,080 |
182,238 |
0 |
753,318 |
Other Equipment |
296,249 |
219,823 |
0 |
516,072 |
Motor Vehicles |
41,859 |
16,901 |
0 |
58,760 |
Other Vehicles |
84,253 |
0 |
0 |
84,253 |
|
48,649,675 |
6,920,987 |
(423,890) |
55,146,772 |
Net Tangible Capital Assets |
Opening Balance |
|
|
Closing balance |
(in dollars) |
|
|
|
|
Land |
604,137 |
|
|
604,137 |
Buildings |
45,886,192 |
|
|
43,079,202 |
Works and Infrastructure |
539,946 |
|
|
517,369 |
Machinery and Equipment |
15,413,567 |
|
|
16,167,152 |
Computer Equipment |
1,432,841 |
|
|
1,006,557 |
Computer Software |
325,027 |
|
|
288,743 |
Other Equipment |
1,453,130 |
|
|
1,784,135 |
Motor Vehicles |
87,331 |
|
|
70,430 |
Other Vehicles |
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
65,742,171 |
|
|
63,517,725 |
Amortization expense for the year ended March 31,2007 is $6,920,987 (2006: $6,263,550)
The agency's employees participate in the Public Service Pension Plan, which is sponsored and administered by the Government of Canada. Pension benefits accrue up to a maximum period of 35 years at a rate of 2 percent per year of pensionable service, times the average of the best five consecutive years of earnings. The benefits are integrated with Canada/Québec Pension Plans benefits and they are indexed to inflation.
Both the employees and the agency contribute to the cost of the Plan. The expense presented below represents approximately 2.2 times the contributions by employees.
(in dollars) |
2007 |
2006 |
Expense for the year |
17,090,105 |
17,052,293 |
The agency's responsibility with regard to the Plan is limited to its contributions. Actuarial surpluses or deficiencies are recognized in the financial statements of the Government of Canada, as the Plan's sponsor.
The agency provides severance benefits to its employees based on eligibility, years of service and final salary. These severance benefits are not pre-funded. Benefits will be paid from future appropriations. Information about the severance benefits, measured as at March 31, is as follows:
(in dollars) |
2007 |
2006 |
Accrued benefit obligation, beginning of year |
24,109,715 |
19,735,444 |
Expense for the year | 5,019,311 | 5,268,011 |
Benefits paid during the year | (616,348) | (893,740) |
Accrued benefit obligation, end of year |
28,512,678 |
24,109,715 |
The nature of the agency's activity results in multi-year contracts and obligations whereby the agency will be committed to make some future payments when the services/goods are received. Contractual obligations that can be reasonably estimated are as follows:
(in dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 and |
Total |
Transfer payments |
25,800,000 |
4,700,000 |
50,650,000 |
4,750,000 |
45,900,000 |
131,800,000 |
The agency is related as a result of common ownership to all Government of Canada departments, agencies, and Crown corporations. The agency enters into transactions with these entities in the normal course of business and on normal trade terms. Also, during the year, the agency received services which were obtained without charge from other Government departments as presented in part (a).
During the year the agency received services without charge from other departments. These services without charge have been recognized in the agency's Statement of Operations as follows:
(in dollars) |
2007 |
2006 |
Accommodation |
7,800,000 |
7,000,000 |
Employer's contribution to the health and dental insurance plans |
11,547,800 |
10,600,000 |
Legal services |
70,394 |
0 |
|
19,418,194 |
17,600,000 |
The Government has structured some of its administrative activities for efficiency and cost-effectiveness purposes so that one department performs these on behalf of all without charge. The costs of these services, which include payroll and cheque issuance services provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada, are not included as an expense in the agency's Statement of Operations.
(in dollars) |
2007 |
2006 |
Accounts receivable with other government departments and agencies |
6,667,560 |
4,724,495 |
Accounts payable to other government departments and agencies |
6,555,838 |
5,484,462 |
Comparative figures have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.
Response to Parliamentary Committees The Standing Committee on Health tabled a report on September 18, 2006 entitled, Even One is too Many: A call for a comprehensive action plan for Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder. The four recommendations in the report focus on: 1) the development of a comprehensive federal and national FASD action plan; 2) addressing issues around leadership, coordination and implementation of an FASD plan; 3) improving data collection and incidence and prevalence reporting; and, 4) putting in place a mechanism for evaluating and reporting to Parliament on FASD activities. For more details: http://cmte.parl.gc.ca/cmte/CommitteePublication.aspx?COM=10481&Lang=1&SourceId=169974 On March 27, 2007, the Standing Committee on Health (HESA) tabled a report on childhood obesity, entitled Healthy Weights for Healthy Kids. Calling childhood obesity an “epidemic”, HESA seeks immediate federal action to halt and reverse the increasing number of overweight/obese children in Canada. The Report recognizes that underlying determinants of health affect children and their parents and their ability to make healthy choices. HESA calls upon all stakeholders to collaborate on comprehensive, coordinated, multi-sectoral measures to promote healthy weights for children through increased access to healthy food choices and quality physical activity. Throughout the Report, HESA encourages the Government of Canada (GoC) to collaborate with First Nations and Inuit people (FN/I) to prevent childhood obesity. For more details: http://cmte.parl.gc.ca/cmte/CommitteePublication.aspx?COM=10481&Lang=1&SourceId=199309 |
Response to the Auditor General including to the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development (CESD) |
The May 2006 status report of the Auditor General included one Chapter which referred to the Public Health Agency of Canada. Chapter 6, Management of Voted Grants and Contributions. The objective of this audit was to determine the extent to which the government has ensured effective government-wide management and control of the spending of public money through grants and contributions. In terms of coverage for the Agency, the Community Action Program for Children was audited. Overall, Canadian Heritage, SSHRC and the Agency met the OAG audit criteria, and found their processes for assessing applicant’s eligibility to be satisfactory. The OAG concluded that the Agency’s progress in terms of monitoring was satisfactory. The February 2007 status report of the Auditor General included one Chapter implicating Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada. Chapter 1: Advertising and Public Opinion Research. The audit looked at a sample of advertising and public opinion research campaigns to see whether the departments administering them were exercising adequate management and control and whether changes made in response to the 2003 audit recommendations were effective. The OAG found that in all but one case the departments had obtained the necessary approval from Cabinet before initiating the campaign. With the Public Health Agency of Canada pandemic influenza campaign, there was no Cabinet decision for the campaign. The Agency explained that a proposal was not submitted for PCO approval and that an advertising agency was hired to develop a campaign that would only be launched in case of a pandemic. The Government Advertising Committee was informed of this and acknowledged this course of action in the Committee’s records of proceedings. Due to the nature of the campaign, the OAG was satisfied with the explanation provided by the department. There was one recommendation: Departments should ensure that the required notification of planned research is provided to PWGSC prior to contacting research firms. Agency management agrees with the recommendation and the Agency’s processes have been amended to ensure that we comply with the requirement. |
External Audits (conducted by the Public Service Commission of Canada or the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages.) |
There was no external audit performed by the Public Service Commission or the Commissioner of Official Languages in 2006-07. |
Internal Audits |
While a number of projects were started, no Internal Audits were completed in 2006-07. The Agency’s Chief Audit Executive was hired in December 2006 and most efforts in the last quarter of 2006-07 were devoted to the infrastructure of the newly created Audit Services Division. |
Evaluations |
The following evaluations were completed in 2005-06:
Evaluations Completed in 2006-07:
The status of the remaining evaluation reports are as follows:
(Note: some evaluation reports' due dates have changed from those planned in the 2006-07 Report on Plans and Priorities) |
Topic |
Departmental Input |
1. What are the key goals, objectives, and/or long-term targets of the SDS? |
During 2006-07, the Agency was still contributing to the Health Canada Sustainable Development Strategy 2004-2007. Health Canada will be reporting on those goals and objectives. Under that Strategy, the Agency had one target, which was completed in 2005-2006. Also during 2006-07, as part of its planning process and to support the federal government’s sustainable development (SD) initiative, the Agency developed and tabled in Parliament two Sustainable Development Strategies: the first in August, to meet legislative obligations; and the second, in December to offer a more robust plan and to coordinate with some 30 other departments. During the development of the SDS, the Agency assessed how best to further incorporate SD principles and values into its policy and operations. The following SDS goals were identified:
|
2. How do your key goals, objectives, and/or long-term targets help achieve your department’s strategic outcomes? |
The focus for 2006-07 was on exploring the link between sustainable development and public health. The Agency’s SD Strategy 2007-2010 states that SD cannot be achieved without a healthy population, and the health of the population cannot be maintained without a healthy environment. The SD Strategy, therefore, supports the Agency’s 2006-07 strategic outcome: ‘Healthier population by promoting health and preventing disease and injury’. The following objectives support the SDS goals: 1.1 Contribute to building healthy and sustainable communities 1.2 Improve the health status of Canadians by fostering preventive and collaborative approaches to SD among the Agency and its partners 2.1 Maximize the use of green procurement 2.2 Minimize the generation of hazardous waste in Agency-occupied facilities 2.3 Increase resource efficiencies in the operations of Agency buildings 3.1 Develop knowledge, commitment and action to implement SD approaches to health public policy 3.2 Develop and use the tools to support the achievement of Goal 1 and 2. 3.3. Establish management systems, roles and responsibilities, authorities and accountabilities to support SDS. |
3. What were your targets for the reporting period? |
The target for the reporting period was to meet the legislated requirement to table an SDS within two years of the establishment of the Public Health Agency of Canada. This target was met on August 16. |
4. What is your progress to date? |
The focus for 2006-07 was on establishing targets for the Agency’s first SD Strategy. In its full strategy, the Agency published 23 SD targets for the 2007-2010 reporting period. |
5. What adjustments have you made, if any? |
Development of the Agency’s first Strategy involved analysis of past targets from the former Population and Public Health Branch and of audit findings and expectations provided by the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development. The Agency’s second Strategy built upon the first Strategy by presenting a more comprehensive set of targets and by providing a management framework with performance indicators. |
Information on Procurement and Contracting can be found at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp.
The Public Health Agency of Canada participates in the following horizontal initiatives:
Supplementary information on these horizontal initiatives can be found at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp.
Information on the Agency’s travel policies can be found at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/estime.asp.
The Agency developed its first ever Strategic Plan in 2006-07. The Strategic Plan will guide the Agency's directions over the next five years by establishing its policy and programming priorities, and defining the areas where it needs to align its efforts and resources to support these priorities. Clear strategic directions and priorities will provide the policy overlay to ensure that annual business plans are well-integrated, resources are aligned accordingly, and the entire effort is supported by integrated human resources planning and clear accountabilities. The Plan also provides the foundation for the Agency to critically review all of its programs and make decisions concerning rationalization, reallocation, adjustment and re-engineering, with a view to enhance the management and effective delivery of the Agency’s programs.
In its Strategic Plan, the Agency has set out three objectives:
In meeting these objectives, the Agency will strive to reach new levels of engagement of its many partners, including Health Canada and the rest of the Health Portfolio, other federal departments, the provinces and territories, stakeholders, and non-governmental organizations. By working collaboratively to deliver on the priorities outlined in the Strategic Plan, the Agency will be well-positioned to make an effective contribution to achieving the unified vision of the Minister of Health and the Government of Canada of healthier Canadians and communities in a healthier world.
In 2006-07, the Agency made progress with its initial Corporate Business Plan, an important initiative designed to assist in moving forward the five-year Strategic Plan. The Agency’s program and support areas identified their objectives, challenges, and strategies in developing the Agency's initial business plan, and laid the foundation for an effective annual business planning process.
In addition, an integrated human resources and business planning methodology was developed to aid the Agency in addressing current and future human resource needs through review of the current workforce, forecasting work requirements and the use of gap analysis to assess the Agency’s capacity to deliver on plans and priorities. The planning approach stimulated considerable analysis and strategic thinking within organizational units inside the Agency. When the integrated business and human resources planning methodology was developed the Agency was in an organizational review and restructuring phase, and was still in the process of finalizing its five-year Strategic Plan. Generation of a cohesive and comprehensive integrated business and human resources plan for the Agency is planned for 2007-08.
The Agency developed an infrastructure to support effective labour-management consultation and communication so that by the end of the 2006-07 it had two consultation fora for labour and employee issues: the National Labour-Management Consultation Committee (NLMCC) and the Human Resources Labour Consultation Committee (HRLCC). The NLMCC met once in 2006-07 following its creation and the HRLCC also met to discuss various matters and was able to address and advance several key issues.
Since the establishment of the two committees there was clear evidence of a change in management’s position vis-à-vis consultation and communication with bargaining agents. In the past, managers had been hesitant to consult with and inform bargaining agents on issues affecting their members. However, after committee establishment, there was a steady transition towards transparency and openness, not only in dialogue, but also in better acceptance of the bargaining agent’s involvement in decision-making and co-development of policies and procedures.
The Agency made considerable progress in training managers on the new staffing regime established through the Public Service Modernization Act as a requirement for delegation of staffing authorities. Subsequent to this training an openness was seen on the part of managers to be more closely engaged in the appointment process, to take greater accountability for staffing decisions, and to receive training and information on new trends and approaches
Also in connection with staffing, departmental policies developed to govern the application of the new Public Service Employment Act in the Agency were reviewed for their applicability and effectiveness. As a consequence, a policy related to acting appointments was introduced and related staffing policies were amended to maintain internal consistency.
As part of building its internal capacity to meet its mandate, during 2006-07, a comprehensive review of the human resources services provided by Health Canada under the Memorandum of Understanding between the Agency and Health Canada was undertaken. This was the first review since the creation of the Public Health Agency of Canada in September 2004 and included the National Capital Region, the Winnipeg pillar and the regional offices across Canada. Its purpose was to ensure that the services provided made good business sense for both organizations under the Health Portfolio in terms of effectiveness, accountability and cost efficiency. As a result of this review, the Agency made further progress in establishing its own infrastructure to deliver human resources services from within the Agency so that, by end of year, corporate human resources policies, labour relations, and human resources planning became the sole responsibility of the Agency and were managed independently of Health Canada.
The Auditor General of Canada has called for better leadership and management in relation to horizontal issues. The Agency’s first comprehensive sustainable development (SD) strategy responds to federal leadership on Sustainable Development matters by aligning its commitments with federal SD goals, objectives and guidelines. Within SD Strategy 2007-2010, the Agency incorporates recommendations by the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development for demonstrated progress in sustainable development and a result-based approach to the management of sustainable development initiatives. In addition, the strategy furthers the concept of horizontality by demonstrating the integration of economic, social and environmental considerations within a public health context. In its sustainable development strategy, the Agency commits to coordinating and collaborating with other departments such as Health Canada, Transport Canada’s Active Transportation Initiatives and with the partners in the Northern Antibiotic Resistance Partnership.
Completion of the SD strategy contributed to the Agency’s risk management activities by identifying opportunities for risk mitigation through sustainable development commitments.
The Strategic Risk Communications Framework and Handbook was launched by the Chief Public Health Officer, and is a new and unique tool designed to enable the Agency to integrate strategic risk communications into effective risk management.
The Framework and Handbook gives Agency employees involved in risk management and risk communications a science-based process to support effective decision-making. It provides the essential tools and techniques needed to enable us to plan and conduct effective risk communication as an integral component of good decision-making with stakeholders and ultimately the Canadian public.
Work on the Framework and Handbook had been underway for three years. A pilot project was successfully conducted at Health Canada in 2005 and subsequently the Agency’s Executive Committee approved the Framework and its implementation at the Agency.
As the group responsible for promoting the Agency-wide adoption and implementation of strategic risk communications, the Communications Directorate began providing support and guidance on how to apply the Framework. Risk communications training began for communications, policy and program employees working together on risk issues. Plans for full implementation through training and application were put in place with the intention of integrating risk communications into the Agency approach to effective decision-making and communications.
In 2006-07, the Agency’s Centre for Excellence in Evaluation and Program Design established an Agency Evaluation Advisory Committee. The Committee has a chair at the Deputy Chief Public Health Officer level, and is composed of five additional voting members. The Chief Audit Executive also participates as a non-voting member. Members’ key responsibilities include reviewing and recommending evaluation reports for Chief Public Health Officer (CPHO) approval, reviewing the accompanying management response and action plans and recommending them for CPHO acceptance, overseeing the development and implementation of an Agency evaluation policy, reviewing the effectiveness of the Agency’s evaluation function, and reviewing the Agency's risk-based evaluation plan and recommending it for CPHO approval. In 2006-07, the Committee reviewed five Agency program evaluation reports and recommended them for approval by the Chief Public Health Officer and subsequent submittal to the Treasury Board Secretariat.
The Centre for Excellence in Evaluation and Program Design also initiated significant development work on a five-year risk based evaluation plan which is a requirement of the Treasury Board Secretariat. The evaluation plan will also ensure Agency programs will be provided with appropriate levels of advice and guidance based on the timing of their upcoming evaluations and the estimated level of risk associated with the program.
The implementation of the ES Development program continued. It is a career development and recruitment program targeting the Agency’s ES workforce. The first external recruitment was completed and qualified candidates were scheduled to start their ESDP placements in the new fiscal year.
During 2005-06 the Agency had a single strategic outcome and a single program activity. An enhanced Program Activity Architecture, to take effect during fiscal year 2007-08, was developed to reflect the Agency’s responsibilities, and to enable a more detailed reporting on accomplishments and resource use. Plans to develop additional components of the Agency's Management Results and Reporting Structure were rescheduled to align with a government-wide process to be completed during 2007-08.
CROSSWALK |
||
|
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
Strategic Outcome |
Healthier Population by promoting health and preventing disease and injury |
Healthier Canadians and a stronger public health capacity |
Program Activity(ies) |
Population and Public Health |
Health Promotion |
Disease Prevention and Control |
||
Emergency Preparedness and Response |
||
Strengthen Public Health Capacity |
||
Program Management and Support |
Program Activities for 2007-08 |
Program Activity Descriptions |
Health promotion |
In collaboration with partners, the Public Health Agency of Canada supports effective actions to promote healthy living and address the key determinants of health and major risk factors for chronic disease, by contributing to knowledge development, fostering collaboration, and improving information exchange among sectors and across jurisdictions. |
Disease prevention and control |
In collaboration with its partners, the Agency leads federal efforts and mobilizes domestic efforts to protect national and international public health. These include:
|
Emergency Preparedness and Response |
The Public Health Agency of Canada provides a national focal point for anticipating, preparing for, responding to and facilitating recovery from threats to public health, and/or the public health complications of natural disasters or human caused emergencies. The Agency applies the legislative and regulatory provisions of The Quarantine Act. It collaborates with international partners to identify emerging disease outbreaks around the globe. Providing leadership in identifying and addressing emerging threats to the health and safety of Canadians through surveillance, risk analysis and risk management activities, the Agency partners with Health Canada, other federal departments, the provinces and territories, international organizations and the voluntary sector to identify, develop and implement preparedness priorities. The Public Health Agency of Canada manages and supports the development of health-related emergency response plans for natural and human caused disasters including the National Influenza Response Plan. The Agency is actively engaged in developing and sponsoring training in emergency preparedness, and coordinates counter-terrorism preparations to respond to accidents or suspected terrorist activities involving hazardous substances. The Agency is a leader on biosafety related issues. It stands ready to provide emergency health and social services, and manages the National Emergency Stockpile System with holdings ranging from trauma kits to complete 200 bed emergency hospitals. |
Strengthen Public Health Capacity |
Working with national and international partners, the Agency develops and provides tools, applications, practices, programs and understandings that support and develop the capabilities of front-line public health practitioners across Canada. The Agency facilitates and sustains networks with provinces, territories, and other partners and stakeholders to achieve public health objectives. The Agency’s work improves public health practice, increases cross-jurisdictional human resources capacity, contributes to effective knowledge and information systems, and supports a public health law and policy system that evolves in response to changes in public needs and expectations. |
Abbreviations |
Meaning |
AHSUNC |
Aboriginal Head Start in Urban and Northern Communities program |
APEC |
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation |
C. difficile |
Clostridium difficile |
CAREID |
Canada-Asia Regional Emerging Infectious Diseases |
CARMEN |
Conjunto do Acciones para la Reduccion Multifactorial de las Enfermedades No Tranmisibles (PAHO initiative) |
CBCI |
Canadian Breast Cancer Initiative |
CBCRA |
Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance |
CCDPC |
Centre For Chronic Disease Prevention And Control |
CDCEG |
Communicable Disease Control Expert Group |
CDS |
Canadian Diabetes Strategy |
CEPR |
Centre For Emergency Preparedness And Response (Agency sub unit) |
CFLRI |
Canadian Fitness And Lifestyle Research Institute |
CFTC |
Child Fitness Tax Credit |
CHIRPP |
Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program |
CHN |
Canadian Health Network |
CHP |
Centre For Health Promotion (Agency sub unit) |
CIDA |
Canadian International Development Agency |
CIDPC |
Centre For Infectious Disease Prevention And Control (Agency sub unit) |
CIHI |
Canadian Institute for Health Information |
CINDI |
Countrywide Integrated Non-communicable Disease Intervention |
CIPARS |
Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance |
CNCD |
Chronic non-communicable disease |
CNISP |
Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program |
CPAC |
Canadian Partnership Against Cancer |
CPHN |
Canadian Public Health Network |
CPHO |
Chief Public Health Officer |
CRG |
Canadian Reference Group |
CSCC |
Canadian Strategy on Cancer Control |
EOC |
Emergency Operations Centre |
EURO |
Regional Office for WHO for Europe |
FASD |
Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder |
GPHIN |
Global Public Health Intelligence Network |
HBSC |
Health Behaviours of School-aged Children |
HERT |
Health Emergency Response Team |
HLIG |
Healthy Living Issue Group |
HPV |
Human Papillomavirus |
IDEP |
Infectious Disease And Emergency Preparedness Branch (Agency sub unit) |
iPHIS |
Integrated Public Health Information System |
JCSH |
Joint Consortium for School Health |
LFZ |
Laboratory For Foodborne Zoonoses (Agency sub unit) |
NACI |
National Advisory Committee on Immunization |
NAS |
National Antiviral Stockpile |
NCC |
National Collaborating Centres |
NCD |
Non-communicable Disease |
NDSS |
National Diabetes Surveillance System |
NESP |
National Enteric Surveillance Program |
NESS |
National Emergency Stockpile System |
NGO |
Non-government Organization |
NML |
National Microbiology Laboratory (Agency sub unit) |
NVHO |
Financial Assistance to National Voluntary Health Organizations |
PACP |
Physical Activity Contribution Program |
PAHO |
Pan-American Health Organization (Regional Offices for WHO for the Americas) |
PHAC |
Public Health Agency of Canada |
PHMG |
Public Health Map Generator |
PHPRO |
Public Health Practice and Regional Operations Branch (Agency sub unit during 2006-07) |
PPS |
Pandemic Preparedness Secretariat (Agency sub unit) |
PSC |
Public Safety Canada |
SARS |
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome |
SDOH |
Social Determinants of Health |
STI |
Sexually Transmitted Infection |
TBS |
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat |
TPSAD |
Transfer Payment Services and Accountability Division (Agency sub unit) |
WHO |
World Health Organization |
WNV |
West Nile virus |
A. External Fee |
Service Standard |
Performance Result |
Stakeholder Consultation |
Fees charged for the processing of access requests filed under the Access to Information Act (ATIA) |
Response provided within 30 days following receipt of request: response time may be extended pursuant to section 9 of the ATIA. Notice of extension to be sent within 30 days of receipt of request. |
See Section B – Other Information Note 1 |
The service standard is established by the ATIA and the Access to Information Regulations. Consultations with stakeholders were undertaken by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Board Secretariat for amendments done in 1986 and 1992. |
B. Other Information 1. Access to Information requests filed for the Agency in 2006-07 were processed by Health Canada. Accordingly, associated revenues and costs are reported under Health Canada for 2006-07. |
The following is a summary of the transfer payment programs for the Public Health Agency of Canada that are in excess of $5 million. All the transfer payments shown below are voted programs.
Department |
|
Points to Address |
Organization’s Input |
1. Role played by procurement and contracting in delivering programs |
Procurement and contracting are integral to program delivery and support at the Agency. They are essential in terms of providing goods and services to the department by contracting for services and procuring goods, particularly in the scientific and research disciplines. Collaboration, sharing of expertise and related information as well as providing operational support are key to ongoing policy and program delivery. |
2. Overview of how the department manages its contracting function |
The Materiel Management Directorate of Health Canada provides procurement and contracting services as part of the Memorandum of Understanding between Health Canada and the Agency for the provision of shared corporate services. Senior contract specialists from Health Canada have been co-located within the Agency to promote procurement planning and develop procurement strategies with the cooperation of program managers. As of July 1, 2005, the Agency used the Health Canada Contract Requisition and Reporting System (CRRS) as the official system of record for contracts and departmental call-ups valued at $10,000 or more. The Agency also uses the same model as Health Canada for its Contract and Requisition Control Committee (CRCC) which reviews and approves most agreements including all service contracts and call-ups of more than $10,000. |
3. Progress and new initiatives enabling effective and efficient procurement practices |
Effective July 1, 2005, the Contract Requisition and Reporting System (CRRS) was implemented as a contract tracking, workflow and approval system. It provides improved capacity to report on contract activity, respond to Access to Information (ATI) and ministerial enquiries and incorporates a review and approval workflow for long form contracts and call-ups against standing offers. This system continues to be expanded and will eventually capture other types of agreements along with enhanced reporting capabilities. The Agency continued to strengthen its Contract and Requisition Control Committee (CRCC) function through continuous improvement of its review and documentation processes. Health Canada procurement resources were deployed to the Agency to develop procurement strategies for program managers and liaise with all parties regarding the processing and administration of contracts. |
The Public Health Agency of Canada participates in the following horizontal initiatives:
Horizontal Initiative |
|||||||||||||
1. Name of Horizontal Initiative: |
2. Name of Lead Department(s): |
||||||||||||
3. Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative: |
4. End Date of the Horizontal Initiative: |
5. Total Federal Funding Allocation: |
|||||||||||
6. Description of the Horizontal Initiative: The Federal Initiative to Address HIV/AIDS in Canada is an evolution from the Canadian Strategy on HIV/AIDS (1998-2004). The Federal Initiative to Address HIV/AIDS in Canada introduces a refocused approach for the federal role in HIV/AIDS, building on the lessons learned over the previous five years, accomplishments, and the evidence for change. It focuses on those populations most vulnerable to HIV/AIDS epidemic - people living with HIV/AIDS, gay men, Aboriginal people, injection drug users, inmates, youth and women at-risk, and people from countries where HIV is endemic. Gender-based analysis and human rights are fundamental to the approach. An integrated approach to program development encompasses issues related to the determinants of health, sexual health and issues related to sexually transmitted infections, co-infections with hepatitis C and tuberculosis. People living with and vulnerable to HIV/AIDS are active partners in shaping policies and practices affecting their lives. |
|||||||||||||
7. Shared Outcome(s): Immediate Outcomes:
Intermediate Outcomes:
Long Term Outcomes:
|
|||||||||||||
8. Governance Structure(s): The Agency (http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/new_e.html) is the federal lead for issues related to HIV/AIDS in Canada. The Public Health Agency is responsible for overall coordination, communications, national/regional programs, policy development, evaluation, surveillance and laboratory science. Health Canada (http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/english/index.html) provides community-based HIV/AIDS education, capacity-building, prevention and related health services to First Nations on-reserve and Inuit communities; leadership on international health policy and program issues; and assistance and guidance on evaluation. As the Government of Canada’s agency for health research, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/193.html) sets priorities for and administers the extramural research program. Correctional Service Canada, (http://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text/home_e.shtml) which is an agency of the Ministry of Public Safety Canada (http://www.ps-sp.gc.ca/index-en.asp), provides health services, including services related to the prevention, care and treatment of HIV/AIDS, to offenders sentenced to imprisonment for two years or more. A new interdepartmental coordinating committee has been established by the Public Health Agency to promote policy and program coherence among the participating departments and agencies, and to maximize the use of available resources. The Ministerial Council on HIV/AIDS (http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/aids-sida/fi-if/minister_e.html) provides independent advice to the Minister of Health on pan-Canadian aspects of HIV/AIDS. The Federal/ Provincial/ Territorial Advisory Committee on AIDS (http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/aids-sida/fi-if/ftp_e.html), a liaison committee of the Public Health Network, serves as a forum to promote a coordinated governmental response to the HIV/AIDS epidemic. The National Aboriginal Council on HIV/AIDS (http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/aids-sida/fi-if/national_e.html) provides advice to the Public Health Agency of Canada and Health Canada on issues relating to HIV/AIDS and Aboriginal populations. The Federal/Provincial/Territorial (FPT) Heads of Corrections Working Group on Health is a sub-committee of the FPT Heads of Corrections. The Working Group on Health promotes policy and program development that is informed and sensitive to the complex issues surrounding the health of inmates, and provides advice to the FPT Heads of Corrections on trends and best practices as they relate to health in a correctional setting. Other federal departments have mandates to address broader social determinants that affect people living with HIV/AIDS or their vulnerability to acquiring the infection, as well as to address the global epidemic. A Government of Canada Assistant Deputy Ministers’ Committee on HIV/AIDS has been struck to establish appropriate links and assist with the development of a broader Government of Canada approach to HIV/AIDS. |
|||||||||||||
9. Federal Partners Involved in each Program |
10. Names of Programs |
11. Total Allocation |
12. Forecasted Spending for 2006‑07 (in millions) |
13. Actual Spending in 2006‑07 (in millions) |
|||||||||
I Public Health Agency of Canada |
Infectious Disease Prevention and Control |
Ongoing |
$27.1 |
$25.6 |
|||||||||
14. Planned Results for 2006‑07 |
15. Achieved Results in 2006‑07 |
||||||||||||
|
The Agency is engaged in: (i) augmented HIV surveillance and risk behaviour surveillance; (ii) targeted epidemiologic studies (i.e., expansion of I-TRACK and M-TRACK for injection drug users and gay men) and the development of programs for at-risk populations; and (iii) improved knowledge and characterization of HIV strains and the transmission of drug-resistant HIV in Canada. During 2005-2006, the Agency worked with national and international partners to update the estimates of national HIV incidence and prevalence in Canada for 2005. The new estimates were released prior to the International AIDS Conference in Toronto in August 2006 and are now being used to guide program and policy actions to address HIV/AIDS in Canada. The Agency also continued to develop Canada’s second-generation HIV surveillance program for monitoring HIV and related risk behaviours among groups at high risk for HIV infection. The monitoring program for people who inject drugs (I-Track) now extends from Quebec to British Columbia, and the program for men who have sex with men (M-Track) completed its first
round of surveys in Montreal and was piloted in Ontario. A pilot study for E-Track (persons from HIV-endemic countries) was started in the Montreal Haitian community and discussions are underway with the Africa-Caribbean Council for HIV in Ontario regarding similar studies. As well, a working committee has been struck involving the National Aboriginal Council on HIV/AIDS
to provide guidance on developing second-generation HIV surveillance studies in the Aboriginal community. The Agency’s domestic Quality Assurance Program delivered by the HIV/AIDS laboratories has been expanded to include HIV resistance (in addition to CD4 T cell counting, serology and viral load testing). Among other research initiatives, the program is exploring how to quality assure HIV rapid testing, which generally does not occur in a controlled laboratory setting. The HIV Genetics Research Program has expanded into the field of molecular epidemiology, which allows researchers to use the genetic code of HIV sub-types to understand how the virus is transmitted among certain groups. For example, based on HIV sub-types in newly diagnosed infections from 2004 (collected by the Canadian HIV Strain and Drug Resistance Surveillance Program), it was determined that 45 per cent of newly diagnosed infections were related to at least one other new infection. Results such as these can better inform prevention efforts for specific target groups. Molecular epidemiology can also assist public health efforts by identifying clusters of infections and supporting outbreak investigations. The Agency’s HIV/AIDS laboratories are also: In 2006-07, the Public Health Agency continued to work with EKOS Research Associates on the HIV/AIDS Attitudinal Tracking Survey 2006, and in partnership with Health Canada, First Nations and Inuit Health Branch (FNIHB), on the HIV/AIDS Aboriginal Attitudinal Survey 2006. The Agency also worked with D-Code and Environics to conduct focus groups to explore tactical approaches for the national HIV/AIDS social marketing campaign on stigma and discrimination. These research components, in addition to a literature review on the demographic and psychographic characteristics of our initial target audience, provided the foundation for the development of preliminary creative concepts and a media strategy for the campaign. In these ways, the Agency made significant headway towards the development of an Agency-led social marketing campaign. In 2006-07, experts and stakeholders were engaged by the Agency to assist the development of Population-Specific HIV/AIDS Status Reports for people from countries where HIV/AIDS is endemic, for gay men, for women and Aboriginal people. The first Status Report for people from countries where HIV/AIDS is endemic is expected to be completed by Fall 2007 with subsequent reports for gay men, women, Aboriginal people, people living with HIV/AIDS, prisoners, people who use injection drugs and youth at risk to be completed in 2008 and 2009. The status reports will significantly advance the evidence base for HIV program planning, policy-making and interventions. In July 2006, the stakeholder-led Canadian HIV Vaccines Plan entitled the Canadian HIV Vaccines Plan: Towards a World Without AIDS was published. The Plan was acknowledged internationally as one of the first country-wide HIV vaccines plans that promotes a comprehensive strategy for vaccine research, advocacy and funding. The committee review has been deferred to 2007-08, so that it can be incorporated into Federal Initiative evaluation commitments. A Responsibility Centre Committee was established in 2006 to serve as an oversight body to ensure that the Federal Initiative is implemented as planned, that programs are aligned and that accountability commitments (as described in the Results-Based Management and Accountability Framework and the Risk-Based Audit Framework) are met. The Committee subsequently set up an Accountability Working Group, comprising representatives of each of the 11 responsibility centres engaged in delivering the Federal Initiative, to carry out the ongoing performance measurement, evaluation and reporting work and to bring results forward for approval. As initial steps to strengthen the performance measurement system, the Accountability Working Group reviewed and simplified the logic model for the Federal Initiative and began to revise the performance indicators. In addition, the Agency is providing HIV surveillance and laboratory services in support of CIDA-funded projects abroad. For example, the Agency is supporting the establishment of an effective second-generation HIV/AIDS surveillance system in Pakistan, which is being financed by CIDA. The information acquired through this system will be used by the Government of Pakistan to monitor the epidemic and to plan, implement and evaluate an expanded response. Similarly, the Public Health Agency and CIDA have supported the Government of Bulgaria in strengthening its HIV/AIDS surveillance system. Following the establishment of both routine and second-generation surveillance among vulnerable populations, the Government of Bulgaria requested and is receiving continued technical support from the Agency for HIV/AIDS surveillance. Similarly, the Agency has provided technical support to the WHO and UNAIDS for a number of expert committees and working groups, such as the UNAIDS/WHO Reference Group on HIV Estimates, Modeling and Projections and the WHO’s Global HIV Resistance Surveillance Network (WHO HIV ResNet). The Public Health Agency also expanded its International Quality Assurance Program in 2005-2006. Ensuring accurate CD4 T cell counting and other testing is critical for antiretroviral drugs to be successfully introduced into resource-limited countries. The International Quality Assurance Program aims to ensure a reasonable level of testing in participating countries, and is the only such network that offers services and training in both English and French (French is a common language in sub-Saharan Africa, the region hardest hit by HIV/AIDS). PHAC also manages training for some U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention programs that target French-speaking countries. In 2006-07, the Public Health Agency undertook preliminary discussions to identify potential Interdepartmental Pilot Projects to address, through horizontal partnerships between the Agency and other federal departments, determinants of health affecting people vulnerable to HIV and people living with HIV/AIDS. Time-limited pilot projects will carry out activities
that: The 2006 Canadian Guidelines on Sexually Transmitted Infections, which represents the most current available knowledge on the management of sexually transmitted infections, was distributed to health care professionals and made available on the Agency website. The Agency's national guidelines on sexual health education have been reviewed to identify "best practice" models of school-based sexual health promotion. The above activities were partially supported by the Federal Initiative on HIV/AIDS. Small amounts of Federal Initiative funding were found beneficial in the leveraging of cooperative cost-shared projects such as the 4 Health 4 Wellness National Youth Retreat in Banff, Alberta, in February 2006. The retreat attracted youth aged 13 to 29 from across Canada who are active in their communities around infectious diseases, social determinants of health and related health and wellness issues. The retreat focussed on peer education and awareness, harm reduction and prevention, care and quality of life, and health and social determinants. Similarly Federal Initiative funding allowed support to be provided to M-Track in order to achieve a better understanding of the risk behaviours involved in acquiring HIV co-infection with viral hepatitis and/or sexually transmitted infections. As a second generation surveillance system, M-Track goes beyond disease reporting to try to understand changes in the epidemic and the behaviours that precede infection. This information can be translated into public health and community interventions to prevent infection or plan for care and support initiatives. |
||||||||||||
9. Federal Partners Involved in each Program |
10. Names of Programs |
11. Total Allocation |
12. Forecasted Spending for 2006‑07 (in millions) |
13. Actual Spending in 2006‑07 (in millions) |
|||||||||
|
Regional HIV/AIDS Program |
$12.3 |
$12.3 |
$10.9 |
|||||||||
14. Planned Results for 2006‑07 |
15. Achieved Results in 2006‑07 |
||||||||||||
|
The Public Health Agency’s regional offices are responsible for administering the AIDS Community Action Program (ACAP), which supports community-based organizations in delivering HIV/AIDS prevention education, creating supportive environments for those infected with and affected by HIV/AIDS, and increasing the capacity of people living with HIV/AIDS to manage their condition (health promotion). ACAP supported a total of 148 projects in 2005-2006, with total grants and contributions funding of $10.3 million. Examples include:
The ACAP Evaluation Working Group is contributing to greater coherence in the federal response by developing a common data collection, evaluation and analysis system that will strengthen the Agency’s ability to systematically collect and assess evidence on the results of ACAP projects. In 2005, the Working Group developed common indicators for outputs and immediate outcomes that will allow for systematic collection across Canada of project-level evidence about ACAP’s effectiveness. Evaluation questions to address these common indicators – which have been aligned with the Federal Initiative – are currently being piloted in a new program evaluation and analysis tool. |
||||||||||||
9. Federal Partners Involved in each Program |
10. Names of Programs |
11. Total Allocation |
12. Forecasted Spending for 2006‑07 (in millions) |
13. Actual Spending in 2006‑07 (in millions) |
|||||||||
II. Health Canada |
First Nations on-reserve and Inuit Community Health |
$2.7 |
$2.7 |
$2.5 |
|||||||||
14. Planned Results for 2006‑07 |
15. Achieved Results in 2006‑07 |
||||||||||||
|
First Nations and Inuit Health Branch (FNIHB)’s HIV/AIDS program supported an International Indigenous Peoples’ Committee, charged to develop a one day conference held the day before the official opening of the XVI International AIDS Conference in Toronto August 12-18, 2006. The Branch provided funding to support the participation of 50 on-reserve First Nations and Northern Labrador Inuit people living with HIV. In 2006-07, new resources allocated under the Federal Initiative were provided to the regions to support their efforts in developing and delivering targeted prevention, education and awareness programs. Manitoba Region provided a"101 HIV Training" course to community-based workers in 06/07. In Atlantic region, a contest was held for junior high/high school students to develop posters with safe sex and protection from STIs and pregnancy (Sheshatshiu). There was also a school based education program (education and awareness) in 2 Innu communities (Natuashish and Sheshatshiu). Awareness of condom use and distribution of same (youth and at community health centers). A Crystal Meth and Youth program focused on Youth has been developed by Healing Our Nations. 13 First Nations community based workshops were held in the first half of the fiscal year. There were 4 STI community based workshops held for youth. Promotion of AIDS Walk at all Healing Our Nations events. New guidelines or policy changes by provincial public health are disseminated to community health nurses as required. An HIV Skills Building workshop, March 2007 was held in Goose Bay, Labrador. There were 32 participants (including youth, community health staff). "Advanced Training" for Healing Our Nations staff took place. This training covered family-training support model, step by step model, community response, rumour protocol, harm reduction, cross cultural training. In Alberta, in November/06 and January/07 Community Health Nurses and treatment nurses from all treaty areas and most communities were provided HIV/AIDS and Hepatitis C in-servicing during two FNIHB Nursing Conferences. Other nurses and Community Health Representatives (CHR) were given similar training in their communities and at the CHR Refresher Program site. Study notes were provided to all groups, and PowerPoint presentation CDs were provided to all nurses and CHRs who requested them. The funding was both at the Regional and National level. Saskatchewan Region had enhanced targeted special projects in 3 First Nations communities this last year. On October 24, 2006 FNIHB Nurses and South-Central transferred nurses - about 70 - 75 people attended training in Saskatoon where issues on HIV surveillance, hepatitis C and needle exchange as well as STIs were discussed. The feedback was very positive The HIV/AIDS and hepatitis C nursing guidelines for nurses working on reserve were completed. However, the translation along with the development and implementation of a train the trainer workshop and a dissemination plan will be completed in 2007-08. FNIHB participates actively in the Federal, Provincial and Territorial HIV/AIDS Advisory Committee. Through a 3 year letter of agreement with the Public Health Agency, FHIHB continues to provide support for Aboriginal AIDS Awareness Week and Pauktuutit. FNIHB also continues to provide support to the Assembly of First Nation (AFN)’s HIV/AIDS activities and to support the National Aboriginal Council on HIV/AIDS (NACHA) for improved programming. Work on the Federal Initiative’s Performance Measurement Strategy started in 2005-06, under the Public Health Agency’s lead, and FNIHB continues to implement evaluation tools and mechanisms at regional levels. |
||||||||||||
9. Federal Partners Involved in each Program |
10. Names of Programs |
11. Total Allocation |
12. Forecasted Spending for 2006‑07 (in millions) |
13. Actual Spending in 2006‑07 (in millions) |
|||||||||
|
International Health |
$1.6 |
$1.6 |
$1.5 |
|||||||||
14. Planned Results for 2006-07 |
15. Achieved Results in 2006‑07 |
||||||||||||
|
The International Affairs Directorate, Health Canada, increased policy coherence through the effective coordination of the Federal presence at the XVI International AIDS Conference in Toronto, August 13-18, 2006. IAD co-ordinated the Federal AIDS 2006 Secretariat, an interdepartmental committee involving 14 departments and agencies. Government of Canada officials were involved in over 15 Satellite sessions, 30 oral/poster presentations and some 20 other events. Canadian engagement in the global response was enhanced through the provision of 7 Global Engagement Grants to Non-government organizations (NGOs) and academic institutions. Activities supported include an international workshop on best practices related to the Prevention of Mother-to-Child-Transmission of HIV; an exchange between Canadian and Malawian clinicians on responding to the rehabilitation needs of people living with HIV/AIDS; and a consultation contributing to the development of model legislation designed to protect the rights of women living with, vulnerable to and affected by HIV/AIDS. |
||||||||||||
9. Federal Partners Involved in each Program |
10. Names of Programs |
11. Total Allocation |
12. Forecasted Spending for 2006‑07 (in millions) |
13. Actual Spending in 2006‑07 (in millions) |
|||||||||
|
Program Evaluation |
$0.1 |
$0.1 |
$0.1 |
|||||||||
14. Planned Results for 2006‑07 |
15. Achieved Results in 2006‑07 |
||||||||||||
|
The Departmental Performance Measurement and Evaluation Directorate at Health Canada, supported the development of the Federal Initiative’s performance management system and evaluation planning. |
||||||||||||
9. Federal Partners Involved in each Program |
10. Names of Programs |
11. Total Allocation |
12. Forecasted Spending for 2006‑07 (in millions) |
13. Actual Spending in 2006‑07 (in millions) |
|||||||||
III. Canadian Institutes of Health Research |
HIV/AIDS Research Projects and Personnel Support |
$17.0 |
$ 17.0 |
$ 16.6 |
|||||||||
14. Planned Results for 2006‑07 |
15. Achieved Results in 2006‑07 |
||||||||||||
|
CIHR, with the assistance of the CIHR HIV/AIDS Research Advisory Committee (CHARAC), and following consultation with a wide range of stakeholders, finalized the priorities for CIHR-funded HIV/AIDS research. The priorities are guiding the development of strategic funding opportunities and investment of Federal Initiative funding in extramural HIV/AIDS Research. The priorities encourage research focusing on high-risk populations within Canada and include a broad range of topics in HIV/AIDS research; the priorities are as follows: Health Systems, Services and Policy; Resilience, Vulnerability and Determinants of Health; Prevention technologies and interventions; Drug development, toxicities and resistance; Pathogenesis; and Issues of co-infection. In response to the priorities, the HIV Prevention Operating Grant Request for Applications (RFA) was launched in December 2006. The RFA was developed to enhance research on the prevention of HIV and to build future Canadian research capacity in this area. The RFA promotes biomedical as well as social/behavioural approaches to prevention and was developed with the assistance of an expert working group which included stakeholders from multiple sectors. A second expert working group was also established in 2006-07 to provide recommendations to CHARAC on RFAs and other activities to address the priorities of Health Systems, Services and Policy; and Resilience, Vulnerability and Determinants of Health. The work of this group will continue in 2007-08. CIHR continued to sustain and enhance Canada’s HIV research activities by funding grants and awards in priority areas through Priority Announcement competitions. Priority Announcements provide funding for meritorious research grants and awards submitted to CIHR open competitions that would not otherwise be funded. In the Priority Announcement competitions, 10 Operating Grants (1 Health Services/Population Health Stream; 9 Biomedical/Clinical Stream), 12 Doctoral Research Awards (3 Health Services/Population Health Stream; 9 Biomedical/Clinical Stream), 12 Fellowship Awards (2 Health Services/Population Health Stream; 10 Biomedical/Clinical Stream), and 2 New Investigator Awards (1 Health Services/Population Health Stream; 1 Biomedical/Clinical Stream) were approved through the HIV/AIDS Initiative and Federal Initiative Funding. Six RFAs were launched under the HIV/AIDS Community-Based Research (CBR) program in June 2006. The RFAs included key research and capacity-building components. Through these RFAs, 7 new CBR grants (2 Aboriginal Stream; 5 General Stream) and 11 capacity-building grants and awards (3 Aboriginal Stream; 8 General Stream) were approved in 2006-07. In addition to the funding provided by the Federal Initiative, CIHR contributes further funding to HIV/AIDS research from its base budget. In total in 2006-07, with combined CIHR and Federal Initiative funding, CIHR funded 299 research grants and awards directly related to HIV/AIDS: 149 Research Grants; 7 Group/Team Grants; 122 Salary and Training Awards; 8 Workshop Grants; 8 CBR Capacity-building Grants; and 5 Other Grants. CIHR also administered 17 Canada Research Chairs in the area of HIV/AIDS. CIHR invested a total of $37.5 million in HIV/AIDS research in 2006-07 ($25.8 million in the 299 grants and awards directly related to HIV/AIDS; $2.6 million in Canada Research Chairs in HIV/AIDS; and an additional $9.2 million in research that is related and important for HIV/AIDS but where HIV/AIDS is not the primary focus of the research). In 2006-07, CIHR established the HIV/AIDS Community-Based Research Steering Committee and the first meeting of the Committee was held on June 13, 2006. The mandate of the Committee is to help guide the future development of the HIV/AIDS CBR Program and make recommendations to CHARAC and CIHR regarding future CBR Requests for Applications. This Committee will help to guide the program and ensure the goals of the HIV/AIDS CBR program are supported by appropriate policies and programs. The Canadian HIV Trials Network (CTN) continued to receive funding from CIHR in 2006-07 in support of research infrastructure. Examples of CTN activities in 2006-07: CTN became involved with a national cohort investigating HIV/HCV co-infection and examining the effect of HAART on liver disease; continued efforts to improve access to clinical trials with the initiation of a new project focused on Aboriginal peoples. |
||||||||||||
9. Federal Partners Involved in each Program |
10. Names of Programs |
11. Total Allocation |
12. Forecasted Spending for 2006‑07 (in millions) |
13. Actual Spending in 2006‑07 (in millions) |
|||||||||
IV. Correctional Service Canada |
Health Services |
$2.4 |
$2.4 |
$ 2.0 |
|||||||||
14. Planned Results for 2006‑07 |
15. Achieved Results in 2006‑07 |
||||||||||||
|
In the summer-fall of 2005, CSC initiated a pilot program on safer tattooing practices in an effort to enhance infectious disease management and control activities in prisons. The pilot concluded in the fall of 2006 and was cancelled by the Minister of Public Safety in December 2006. CSC requested advice from the Agency with respect to the usefulness of needle exchange as a means of preventing infectious disease transmissions/acquisition in correctional facilities. The Agency report is under review by CSC. Draft Discharge Planning Guidelines have been developed that will enhance current efforts to provide support for inmates with ongoing care and treatment needs for infectious diseases while under the community supervision portion of their sentence. Inmates with chronic health conditions who require support in transition to the community will be identified during the reception process and will be monitored through their sentence. Health care in the community will be facilitated for low functioning offenders with ongoing health needs and counselling and support in the community will promote compliance with ongoing treatment requirements. The Guidelines will be finalized by March 2008. CSC continued to offer the Special Initiatives Program, which provides inmates with the opportunity to develop educational materials and/or organize activities dealing with HIV (and other infectious diseases) prevention, for other inmates. |
||||||||||||
|
|
Total $84.4 in 2008-09 |
Total $63.2 |
Total $59.2 |
|||||||||
18. Contact Information: Marsha Hay Snyder |
1. Name of Horizontal Initiative: |
2. Name of Lead Department(s): |
||||||||
3. Start Date of the Horizontal Initiative: late 2006 |
4. End Date of the Horizontal Initiative: Ongoing |
5. Total Federal Funding Allocation (first 5 years): $617M Cash basis |
|||||||
6. Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement): Canada is facing 2 major, inter-related animal and public health threats: the potential spread of avian influenza virus (H5N1) to wild birds and domestic fowl in Canada and the potential for a human adapted strain to arise, resulting in human-to-human transmission, potentially triggering a human influenza pandemic. A coordinated and comprehensive plan to address both avian and pandemic influenza is required. In 2006 the Health Portfolio received $422M over 5 years to improve preparedness for avian and pandemic influenza. The bulk of the initiatives are ongoing. Initiatives are being launched in the areas of vaccines and antivirals, surge capacity, prevention and early warning, emergency preparedness, critical science and regulation, risk communication, and inter-jurisdictional collaboration. Efforts also will be undertaken to fill gaps in on-reserve planning and preparedness and enhance federal capacity to deal with an on-reserve pandemic. Under the umbrella of “Preparing for Emergencies”, in 2006 the CFIA obtained $195M to be spent over 5 years to enhance Canada’s state of AI preparedness. Canada’s Avian Influenza Working Group was established in 2006 to update policies, protocols, operating procedures, and systems to enhance Canada’s state of preparedness—through collaborations and partnership— in 5 pillars of strategies and processes for prevention and early warning, emergency preparedness, emergency response, recovery, and communications. |
|||||||||
7. Shared Outcome(s): These initiatives will allow the federal government to strengthen Canada’s capacity to prevent and respond to immediate animal health and economic impacts of avian influenza while increasing preparedness for a potential pandemic. Greater Protection for Canadians will come about with improved vaccines and antivirals, improved emergency preparedness, and increased surge capacity to better address peak periods, as well as through critical science and regulation processes in the area. There will be enhanced on-reserve planning and preparedness and improved federal capacity to deal with an on-reserve pandemic. Response Speed and Understanding will be enhanced through prevention and early warning measures, risk communication and inter-jurisdictional collaboration. |
|||||||||
8. Governance Structure(s): At time of writing the governance structure is under development. Current thinking is that under the auspices of the Deputy Minister’s Committee on Avian and Pandemic Influenza Planning (CAPIP) a series of committees and working groups would be established focussing on each of the key horizontal areas coordinated by a DG committee with leadership provided by an ADM committee with a representative from each of the funded departments or agencies. |
|||||||||
9. Federal Partner(s) |
10. Names of Programs for the Federal Partner(s) |
11. Total Allocation From Start to End Date |
12. Planned Spending for 2006–07 |
13. Actual Spending in 2006–07 |
14. Planned Results for 2006–07 |
15. Results Achieved in 2006–07 |
|||
1. Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) |
(a) Vaccine |
ongoing |
$10.7M |
$0.3M |
Revised GSK contract reflecting readiness fee, facility upgrade as well mock vaccine(s) production costs and clinical trials. Staff hired & trained and have begun designing clinical trials and regional projects for adverse event reporting and strengthened adverse event surveillance and reporting. |
Increase knowledge of influenza vaccine safety monitoring A change in ownership of the Contractor (now wholly owned by GSK) led to a number of incidental benefits to Canada. GSK upgraded their commercial manufacturing facility to required bio-security levels .This reduced the need for a separate pilot plant, however, its continued value to Canada for future work is still being investigated. GSK has produced a mock vaccine and done preliminary clinical trials. The results of these trials are still being assessed and will be used to design new trials to answer additional questions of specific interest to Canada. As a result, the funding allocated for Cdn. trials was re-profiled to a future fiscal year |
|||
|
(b) Rapid Vaccine development and testing |
ongoing |
$.1M |
$0.0M |
Lead scientist recruited. |
Work Description for Lead Scientist is being prepared; however, recruiting for this specialized expertise is expected to be difficult. |
|||
|
(c) Contribution |
ongoing |
$29.9M |
$15.1M |
A mix of antivirals is procured to bring the national stockpile to its 55.7 million doses target. |
The national antiviral stockpile was increased to approximately 50 M doses through new purchases and an agreement in principle that P/Ts with existing stocks would absorb them into the national stockpile – subject to the funding arrangement previously agreed to by FPT Ministers. Funding allocated in 2006/07 went to new procurement (approx. 6.3 M doses). |
|||
|
(d) Additional antivirals in NESS |
$12.5M |
$0 |
$0 |
Nothing in 2006-07. |
Nothing in 2006-07. |
|||
|
(e) Capacity for Pandemic Preparedness |
ongoing |
$5.1M |
$2.4M |
Pandemic Preparedness Secretariat in place; establishment of a grants and contributions fund/program; and investments in strategic policy, executive briefing and support, risk assessment, correspondence and support to the Communicable Disease Control Expert Group and regional policy/communications liaison. |
Pandemic Preparedness Secretariat has been established. |
|||
|
(f) Surveillance Program |
ongoing |
$5.6M |
$1.9M |
New staff engaged and expanded access to alert system
Infection control guidelines revised
Improved early detection in wildfowl
Training designed for early detection and response for health professionals
Options assessed for monitoring disease severity and for placing surveillance officers
Developed options to address gaps in readiness for electronic health record and continued development/support for existing systems |
Hiring process ongoing. All 5 CNPHI FTE’s have been staffed and additional funds from the Salary envelope were used to staff a sixth and seventh position (on term/casual basis). An Expert Working Group was established, which met on April 26-27 2007, to initiate a comprehensive review and revision of Annex F of the Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan (CPIP), Infection Control and Occupation Health Guidelines during Pandemic Influenza in Traditional and Non-Traditional Health Care Settings. This process will include an independent review of the modes of transmission of influenza as well as an examination of the risk-benefit considerations in the use of N-95 respirators. The revision will be ongoing over the next 6-8 months. Implementation of Migratory Waterfowl and Wild Bird Surveillance in Canada – Canada’s Interagency Wild Bird Survey to sample species of wild birds to better understand the wildlife reservoirs of influenza A viruses in Canada. Initiated the development of an accredited course for front-line and public health physicians across Canada for early detection and reporting of emerging or re-emerging infectious diseases of public health significance (contract signed with the Canadian Public Health Association). Implementation of the Public Health Network Issue Group: National Non-Enteric Zoonotic Diseases Committee (monthly teleconference from April/May 2006 to November 2006 and inaugural face-to-face meeting on March 23, 2007). Support the integrated public health information system (iPHIS) and undertook necessary enhancements such as the improved capability to extract pertinent data thereby enhancing its robustness ensuring that jurisdictions using it are ready for its optimal usage while responding to any outbreaks and health emergencies. |
|||
|
(g) Emergency Preparedness |
ongoing |
$5.9M |
$5.5M |
Regional networks for the collaboration and coordination of plans across jurisdictions, including an interface with FN/I community plans.
Plans for expanding Vancouver, Montreal and Halifax maritime ports.
National coordinator hired to focus on emergency social services that includes the development of a framework for enhancing community preparedness. Office established to support the development of a national incident command system.
NESS will have acquired critical supplies and hired staff to manage the additional materials. Hired an engineer to provide improved capacity to review and assess laboratory certification plans. Development of exercises to test pandemic plans.
Upgraded video capacity of the Emergency Operations Centre. |
Networks developed with FNIHP, provinces/territories, INAC to support First Nation communities in the development of Pandemic Plans. Discussions with provinces and territories to develop procedures operationalzing the Quarantine Act. A plan was developed to hire a Coordinator to oversee federal, provincial and territorial emergency social services. A federal, provincial and territorial government secretariat and coordination mechanism were established with our Office of Program and Business Coordination. Collaboration was established with the Council of Emergency Social Services Directors, the Directors of Voluntary Organizations Council. Worked with Canadian Red Cross and Public Safety Canada to develop a vulnerability/resiliency framework. Formed and supported the Inter-agency Psychosocial Working Group. The Agency coordinated and supported a federal, provincial and territorial government working group to establish a national framework for the development and implementation of the National Health Incident Management System. Mechanisms were established for communication and coordination with other jurisdictions. NESS continues to build a robust stockpile to respond to modern day risks. In 2006/07, NESS hired one store person and invested $2.6 million in the procurement of critical supplies to enhance its capacity to respond to an avian flu type incident. An engineering position was created, support staff was brought in on secondment in the interim.
A federal, provincial and territorial government table top exercise was held in December 2006 in conjunction with the National Forum to test communications among partners and stakeholders. Planning was started to develop and present detailed exercises for federal, provincial and territorial government partners. The Emergency Operations Centre purchased video equipment required for the upgrade of the video capacity of the centre. |
|||
|
(h) Emergency human resources |
ongoing |
$0.2M
|
$0.1M |
Health Crisis Response Plan completed and provided logistical support for a comprehensive consultation process. |
HRD Health Crisis Response Plan and BCP completed following extensive consultative processes. |
|||
|
(i) Winnipeg lab & space optimization |
ongoing |
$1.5M
|
$0.2M |
Effective Project Approval (EPF) for the purchase of the Logan Lab obtained. |
A property for the Offsite Storage facility was identified and a lease entered into via PWGSC. |
|||
|
(j)Strengthening the public health lab network |
ongoing |
$3.0M
|
$1.3M |
Team leader and technicians in place and procurement of sensors and analyzers started. |
One Surveillance Officer position was staffed. |
|||
|
(k) Influenza research network |
ongoing |
$1.1M |
$0 |
Membership established and planning for the first meeting completed. |
As funding was reprofiled to 2007-08, these activities were not initiated. |
|||
|
(l) Pandemic influenza risk assessment & modelling |
ongoing |
$0.6M
|
$0.2M |
New positions staffed and three workshops held. |
One new position (ES-5) has been staffed, as per the HR commitments for FY2006/7; and the staffing of three other positions (REM-2, MA-5 and ES-3) is currently underway, for FY2007/8. National/international workshops were held, on transmission dynamics of infectious diseases with a special focus on pandemic influenza, the interface between modeling and public health practice, and operations research and public health. The Synchrony, waves and spatial spread of influenza in Canada project was initiated, and work will continue throughout Y2007/8. |
|||
|
(m) Performance & evaluation |
ongoing |
$0.4M
|
$0.3M |
Evaluation positions filled and an integrated RMAF-RBAF for the new Terms and Conditions relating to the new grants and contributions programs completed. |
An Integrated Result-based Management and Accountability Framework and Risk-based Audit Framework for the Public Health Grants and Contributions Programs was approved by TBS. An Interdepartmental Evaluation Plan is near completion and is scheduled to be submitted to TBS in September 2007. This document includes a performance measurement framework, an evaluation framework (including a plan for the summative evaluation in 2011/12), and a logic model. Work is underway to fill evaluation positions at the Centre for Excellence in Evaluation and Program Design (CEEPD). A Senior Evaluation Analyst has been hired, and a staffing consortium is underway and will be used to recruit Evaluation Analysts to work on the pandemic file. |
|||
|
(n) Pandemic influenza risk communications strategy |
ongoing |
$1.2M
|
$1.8M |
Research updated and initial plans around citizen readiness/public information and media relations outreach are developed. Advanced the public involvement strategy. |
Technical briefings with media on antivirals strategy done across the country. |
|||
|
(o) Skilled national public health workforce |
ongoing |
$0.3M
|
$0.2M |
Core staff to be engaged for planning and design of the Canadian Public Health Service. Agreements on selection and deployment to be established with the provinces and territories. Instruments for administering grants developed. |
Core staff engaged; Regional Lens process to outline activities and create budget for Agency Regional involvement completed; initial consultations for internal collaboration among Agency field staff programs held. Plans for internal/external advisory group for staff selection and deployment completed. First round of consultations with Provinces completed; initial identification of key occupational and location gaps received. Public Health Terms and Conditions for use of grant money completed. |
|||
2. Health Canada (HC) |
(a) Regulatory activities related to Pandemic Influenza Vaccine |
ongoing |
$0.6M |
$0.3M |
Prepared for the WHO assessment of Canada’s national vaccine regulatory system as part of its program to pre-qualify vaccines that will be purchased by UN agencies. |
Completed the WHO pre-inspection visit of the National Regulatory Authority for vaccines (Pre-inspection completed Oct 06). Prepared for the WHO Assessment of the National Regulatory Authority for Vaccines (BGTD/HC). The assessment was completed in Jan/07. Pending recommendations resulting from the assessment, compliance activities may require further action in 07-08. Over the course of the fiscal year, several activities were completed that supported the review capacity in the lot release area: •reviewed guidance document for submission content requirements •developed reagents for the evaluation of pandemic vaccines •developed alternative assays for conserved regions of flu virus (to facilitate a more rapid development of vaccine against a new strain) •transfer of knowledge, methods and techniques for quantification of contaminants in vaccines •coordinated validation of assays with other Centres within BGTD (this included collaboration with the Centre for Biologics Research in developing tests for a pandemic influenza vaccine) •trained technical and review staff in high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and capillary electrophoresis (CE) methods for testing. |
|||
|
(b) Resources for approval of antiviral drug submissions for treatment of pandemic influenza |
ongoing |
$0.1M |
$0.0M
|
Identify scenarios under which Interim Orders for the approval of a pandemic influenza vaccine can be applied. Drafting of instructions for the various interim orders. |
A new Assessment Officer was hired in March, 2007. Assigned the task of developing a guidance document for the submission and Expedited Review of pandemic drugs. Since joining TPD he initiated the project of drafting of the review guidance document entitled Expedited Pandemic Influenza Drug Review (EPIDR). Consultations within Health Canada are currently ongoing to ensure the EPIDR process would be the best path to rapidly and efficiently review drug submissions in the event of an influenza pandemic. It is expected that the draft will be available in the coming year for internal management comments / input. Some acquisitions for office set-up were made. |
|||
|
(c) Establishment of a crisis risk management unit for monitoring and post market assessment of therapeutic products |
ongoing |
$0.1M |
$0.0M |
Training of technical and review staff in methods for testing and development of reagents and assays for the evaluation of pandemic vaccines. |
MHPD completed acquisitions required for the establishment of the Crisis Management Unit. |
|||
|
(d) FN/I Surge Capacity |
$1.48M |
$0 |
$0 |
No deliverables expected in this period. |
In advance of 07/08 funding, FNIHB began preparatory work using existing resources to initiate discussions with national and provincial Aboriginal organizations, the Agency and the provinces. |
|||
|
(e) Strengthening Federal Public health capacity |
ongoing |
$0.1M |
$0.1M |
The devlopment of recommendations on how health emergency preparedness and response teams will best support the needs of the pandemic program. |
With respect to addressing gaps in pandemic-related medical supplies in FNIHB on-reserve health facilities, consultations took place with key stakeholders and experts in FN/I and/or infection control, resulting in a survey that will be conducted in May 2007. A paper recommending how to establish the health emergency preparedness and response teams can be specifially attributed to this initiative. These recommendations will be presented to senior management in 07/08 and will form the basis upon which the teams will be established. |
|||
|
(f) First Nations & Inuit emergency preparedness, planning, training and integration |
ongoing |
$0.4M |
$0.4M |
To enhance FNIHB’s ongoing work with Aboriginal organizations and First Nations and Inuit communities to support development of community level pandemic influenza preparedness plans and to integrate with provincial planning. facilities. |
As an enhancement to existing resources, it is difficult to attribute specific outcomes to this initiative. In terms of the emergency preparedness/ planning component, this initiative has resulted in the development by the Assembly of First Nations (AFN) of a common, culturally appropriate approach to pandemic planning on reserve. This approach was pilot tested in three on-reserve communities in 2006/07. |
|||
|
(g) Public health on passenger conveyances |
ongoing |
$0.1M |
$0.1M |
1. Training materials: a better understanding of the Quarantine Act, roles and responsibilities. 2. Purchase of and training on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): preparedness and competance in use. 3. Development of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs): clear direction to staff and transparency in process. 4. Establish network contacts/agreements/MOUs: efficient and effective emergency response due to pre-existing protocls and agreements. 5. Participate in Interdepartmental Preparedness planning: a better capacity to respond to emergencies. 6. Provide advice, consultation and routine inspections at designated sites: meeting national and international obligations. 7. Training of staff: increased competance. 8. Development of contigency planning: program resiliance and capacity. 9. Designation of EHOs: empowered to enforce the Quarantine Act. 10. Develop Surge Capacity: increased capacity to respond |
1. Training materials created and presented. 2. Purchase of and training on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). 3. Development of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). 4. Establish network contacts/agreements/MOUs. 5. Participate in Interdepartmental Preparedness planning. 6. Provide advice, consultation and routine inspections at designated sites. 7. Trained staff and increased competence. 8. Development of contigency planning. 9. Designation of EHOs. 10. Develop and tested use of surge capacity. |
|||
3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) |
(a) Influenza research priorities |
$21.5M |
$2.5M |
$1.8M |
Create Pandemic Preparedness Strategic Research Initiative Task Group and identify research prioritites
|
Task Group was created and meetings were held to develop draft priorities. Key stakeholders were consulted and priorities were finalized. |
|||
Establish partnerships with stakeholder organizations |
Partnerships were established with the Agency, CFIA, Health Canada, the International Development Research Centre, Canada's Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies (Rx&D)/Health Research Foundation, Canadian Foundation for Infectious Diseases and Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada. |
||||||||
Develop and launch new targeted funding programs |
Developed and launched the first request for applications (RFA). Peer reviewed and funded applications (34 grants funded). Developed and launched second round of three RFAs |
||||||||
Hire staff |
Position role profile developed, posted and interviews completed. |
||||||||
Develop reporting strategy |
Working with other departments and agencies on reporting strategy. |
||||||||
4. Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) |
(a) Animal vaccine bank |
ongoing |
$0.5M |
$.08M |
|
|
|||
|
(b) Access to antivirals |
ongoing |
$0.1M |
$0.2M |
|
|
|||
|
(c) Specialized equipment |
$33.73M |
$5.5M |
$1.1M |
|
|
|||
|
(d) Laboratory surge capacity & capability |
ongoing |
$2.7M |
$0.8M |
|
|
|||
|
(e) Field surge capacity |
ongoing |
$1.0M |
$0.8M |
|
|
|||
|
(f) National veterinary reserve |
ongoing |
$0.8M |
$0.0 |
|
|
|||
|
(g) Enhanced enforcement measures |
ongoing |
$0.8M |
$0.7M |
|
|
|||
|
(h) Avian biosecurity on farms |
ongoing |
$3.8M |
$2.7M |
|
|
|||
|
(i) Real property requirements |
$4.04M |
$2.7M |
$1.8M |
|
|
|||
|
(j) Domestic and wildlife surveillance program |
ongoing |
$2.5M |
$4.7M |
|
|
|||
|
(k) Field training |
ongoing |
$1.0M |
$0.9M |
|
|
|||
|
(l) AI enhanced management capacity |
ongoing |
$0.2M |
$0.9M |
|
|
|||
|
(m) Updated emergency response plans |
ongoing |
$1.6M |
$0.6M |
|
|
|||
|
(n) Risk assessment and modelling |
ongoing |
$2.5M |
$0.9M |
|
|
|||
|
(o) AI research |
ongoing |
$0.5M |
$0.9M |
|
|
|||
|
(p) Strengthened economic & regulatory framework |
ongoing |
$0.9M |
$0.0 |
|
|
|||
|
(q) Performance & evaluation |
ongoing |
$0.6M |
$0.5M |
|
|
|||
|
(r) Risk communications |
ongoing |
$2.5M |
$0.0 |
|
|
|||
|
(s) International collaboration |
ongoing |
$0.9M |
$0.02 |
|
|
|||
|
|
Total $ |
Total $100.6M |
Total $49.6M |
|
|
|||
16. Comments on Variance(s): |
|||||||||
17. Results Achieved by Non-federal Partners: NA |
|||||||||
18. Contact Information: Dr. Arlene King |
Comparison to the TBS Special Travel Authorities
Travel Policy of the Public Health Agency of Canada: |
The Agency follows and uses the TBS Special Travel Authority parameters. |
Comparison to the TBS Travel Directive, Rates and Allowances
Travel Policy of the Public Health Agency of Canada: |
The Agency follows and uses the TBS Travel Directive, Rates and Allowances. |